Renal effects of amphotericin B lipid complex

A study was conducted to compare the renal effects of amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), a lipid formulation of the widely used antifungal medication, with conventional amphotericin B (AmB) in the treatment of serious fungal infections, including invasive candidiasis, cryptococcal meningitis, and aspergillosis. The clinical experience of ABLC includes two types of open-label studies: randomized comparative (ABLC 5 mg/kg/d compared with AmB 0.6 to 1 mg/kg) and emergency use. In the comparative studies, changes in serum creatinine were evaluated three ways: doubling of the baseline value, an increase from < or = 1.5 mg/dL at baseline to > or = 1.5 mg/dL, and an increase from < or = 1.5 mg/dL at baseline to > or = 2.0 mg/dL. More patients in the AmB group reached these end points than in the ABLC group (P < or = 0.007), and the time needed to reach each of these end points was significantly shorter for the AmB group (P < or = 0.02). Increased serum creatinine was reported as an adverse event more frequently by patients receiving AmB than by patients receiving ABLC. In the emergency use study, a steady and statistically significant decrease in serum creatinine was observed among patients who started ABLC treatment with serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dL due to prior AmB treatment. ABLC offers the physician a valuable, less-nephrotoxic alternative to AmB for the treatment of patients with severe, invasive fungal infections.     

Safety of aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) may be more efficacious than conventional amphotericin B in the prevention of fungal infections in animal models, but experience with aerosolized ABLC in humans is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, noncomparative study designed to evaluate safety of aerosolized ABLC in lung or heart-lung transplant recipients. RESULTS: A total of 381 treatments were administered to 51 patients. Complete spirometry records were available for 335 treatments (69 in intubated patients, 266 in extubated patients). ABLC was subjectively well tolerated in 98% of patients. Pulmonary mechanics worsened by 20% or more posttreatment in less than 5% of all treatments. There were no significant adverse events related to study medication in any patient, and 1-year survival for all enrolled patients was 78%. CONCLUSION: Administration of nebulized ABLC is safe in the short-term and well-tolerated in lung transplant recipients. Additional prospective, randomized studies are needed to determine the efficacy of aerosolized ABLC alone or in conjunction with systemic therapies in the prevention of fungal infections in lung transplant recipients.     

Efficiency and Safety of Inhaled Amphotericin B Lipid Complex (Abelcet) in the Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections Following Lung Transplantation

Background

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LT) are associated with significant mortality. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of aerosolized amphotericin B deoxycholate and oral fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis. Evolving data show a potential advantage of prophylaxis with lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B in the prevention of IFIs. We reviewed the incidence of IFIs among patients receiving aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) in LT.

Methods

We undertook a retrospective review of the results of our antifungal protocol in a cohort of 60 LT patients. We analyzed the efficiency, safety, and tolerability of 50 mg of aerosolized ABLC administered postoperatively for IFI prophylaxis once every 2 days for 2 weeks and then once per week for at least 13 weeks. In addition, these transplanted patients received fluconazole (200 mg/d) during the first 21 days posttransplant. The prophylaxis-related efficiency and safety were quantified for IFIs and adverse events (AEs) for 6 months after study drug initiation.

Results

Prophylaxis was efficient in 59 (98.3%) patients. Only one patient developed a possible IFI, due to Aspergillus fumigatus. Four patients presented nausea and vomiting as an AE, although aerosolized amphotericin B was ongoing.

Conclusions

Nebulized ABLC was effective, safe, and well tolerated for the prophylaxis of aspergillosis in lung transplant patients during the early posttransplant period.     

Preemptive prophylaxis with a lipid preparation of amphotericin B for invasive fungal infections in liver transplant recipients requiring renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant renal replacement therapy has been shown to be an independently significant risk factor for invasive fungal infections after liver transplantation. We assessed the efficacy of a lipid preparation of amphotericin B as prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections, directed toward liver transplant recipients requiring renal replacement therapy. METHODS: A total of 148 patients transplanted between 1990 and 1997 received no antifungal prophylaxis. Since 1997, 38 patients underwent liver transplantation; antifungal prophylaxis with a lipid preparation of amphotericin B was used in patients requiring renal replacement therapy. RESULTS: Fifteen percent (22 of 148) of the patients transplanted before 1997 required renal replacement therapy. In this cohort, the incidence of invasive fungal infections (36% vs. 7%, P=0.0007) and invasive aspergillosis (14% vs. 2%, P=0.02) was significantly higher in patients who required renal replacement therapy compared with those who did not. Since 1997, 29% (11 of 38) of the patients required renal replacement therapy and received antifungal prophylaxis. Invasive fungal infections occurred in 36% (8 of 22) of the patients who received no prophylaxis (patients before 1997), and 0% (0 of 11, P=0.03) in those who received antifungal prophylaxis (since 1997). Antifungal prophylaxis was independently associated with protection from fungal infection (P=0.017). No reduction in mortality with antifungal prophylaxis was documented. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis with a lipid preparation of amphotericin B was associated with a significant reduction in invasive fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients, i.e., those requiring renal replacement therapy. However, no beneficial effect on survival could be documented.     

Prospective interventional study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B as prophylaxis of fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION: Invasive fungal infections are a life-threatening complication in transplant recipients. The prevalence of fungal infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is 5% to 42%. The most common isolated pathogens are Candida and Aspergillus species. High-risk liver transplant recipients are more susceptible to the development of invasive fungal infections, with prevalence >40% and mortality rates of 78% to 100%. The strategy for fungal prophylaxis in this population has not been defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 100 consecutive OLT followed for 28 months, 21 recipients (15 men, overall mean age of 48.5 years, range 23-65 years) were considered to be high risk for the development of fungal infections when they presented at least one of the following criteria: acute liver failure, assisted ventilation >7 days, retransplantation, relaparotomy, antibiotic therapy >14 days, transfusion requirements >20 red blood cells units, and/or biliary leakage. This group received intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (1 mg/kg/d for 7-10 days). RESULTS: One-year survival in the high-risk group was 80%. Prevalence of invasive fungal infection was 9.5%. No Candida infection was observed. Two patients developed Aspergillus infection: an abdominal aspergillosis treated with percutaneous drainage and liposomal amphotericin B (5 mg/kg/d) showed a favorable clinical outcome. The other patient who developed brain aspergillosis died 25 days after OLT. Adverse events related to the drug were hypokalemia (n = 2), back pain (n = 3), and renal dysfunction (n = 2). None of these events required withdrawal of the prophylaxis regimen. CONCLUSION: In our series, prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B in high-risk liver graft recipients showed a low rate of severe fungal infections. More studies are needed in order to determine the highest risk population and the best drug dosage.     

Influence of albumin dialysis on pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion and amphotericin B lipid complex

Albumin dialysis (AD) is a therapeutic option in severe cholestatic liver failure. However, it can significantly enhance drug elimination. Pharmacokinetic data on antimicrobial agents--in particular on antimycotics--administered under this clinical condition are very sparse. Therefore, amphotericin B (AMB) plasma concentrations were measured in two critically ill patients who were treated with AD because of severe cholestatic liver failure and were prescribed lipid formulated AMB--either AMB colloidal dispersion (ABCD) or AMB lipid complex (ABLC)--for suspected invasive fungal infection. AD was performed with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS). Lipid-associated and liberated AMB were separately quantified on and off AD. The clearance of the liberated AMB fraction was not essentially affected (ABLC) or moderately enhanced during AD by a factor of 2.5 (ABCD). The clearance of the lipid-formulated fraction was increased by a factor of 4 during AD (ABCD) or was similar (ABLC) on and off AD. Despite the fact that there was a four-fold higher clearance of the lipid-formulated fraction of ABCD, the clinically relevant area under the concentration time curve of the liberated AMB fraction was only moderately changed (by 37% in ABCD, 70% in ABLC) during AD. Thus, the effect of AD on lipid formulated AMB appears to be moderate. A daily dose of 5 mg/kg will probably lead to adequate plasma levels in patients on AD.     

A randomized prospective trial of amphotericin B lipid emulsion versus dextrose colloidal solution in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Amphotericin B is the agent of choice for most invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients. It is associated with at least a 50% incidence of nephrotoxicity, despite prophylactic measures such as sodium loading. Newer formulations of amphotericin B are available but are costly and have unknown bioavailability in critically ill patients. Previous trials in neutropenic and critically ill patients have demonstrated that mixing amphotericin B with 20% lipid solution (Intralipid; Clintec Nutrition, Deerfield, III) may decrease nephrotoxicity. METHODS: In this randomized, prospective clinical trial, patients with positive fungal blood cultures, tracheal/sputum cultures or peritoneal cavity cultures were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg/kg per day of amphotericin B dextrose or 1.0 mg/kg per day of amphotericin B lipid emulsion. Duration of therapy was determined by the primary care team. Weekly 24-hour creatinine clearance was measured until 2 weeks after amphotericin B therapy was completed. RESULTS: The two groups were similar based on age, white blood cell count, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance at the beginning of therapy. The group receiving amphotericin B lipid emulsion had significantly less decrease in creatinine clearance compared with controls, despite receiving significantly more amphotericin B. CONCLUSION: Amphotericin B lipid emulsion can be given at a higher total cumulative dose than amphotericin B dextrose with less nephrotoxicity.     

Correlates of acute renal failure in patients receiving parenteral amphotericin B

BACKGROUND: While parenteral amphotericin B is an effective therapy for serious fungal infections, it frequently causes acute renal failure (ARF). This study identified correlates of ARF in amphotericin B therapy and used them to develop clinical prediction rules. METHODS: All 643 inpatients receiving parenteral amphotericin B therapy at one tertiary care hospital were included. Data regarding correlates were obtained both electronically and from manual chart review in a subsample of 231 patients. ARF was defined as a 50% increase in the baseline creatinine with a peak > or =2.0 mg/dL. RESULTS: Among 643 episodes, ARF developed in 175 (27%). In the larger group, the only independent correlate of ARF was male gender (OR = 2.2, 95% CI, 1.5 to 3.3). In the subsample (N = 231), independent correlates of ARF were maximum daily amphotericin dosage, location at the time of initiation of amphotericin therapy, and concomitant use of cyclosporine. These data were used to develop two clinical prediction rules. A rule using only data available at initiation of therapy stratified patients into groups with probability of ARF ranging from 15 to 54%, while a rule including data available during therapy (maximum daily dose) stratified patients into groups with probability of ARF ranging from 4 to 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Acute renal failure occurred in a quarter of the patients. Correlates of ARF at the beginning and during the course of amphotericin therapy were identified and then combined to allow stratification according to ARF risk. These data also provide evidence for guidelines for the selection of patients for alternative therapies.     

Efficacy and safety of Amphotericin B Lipid Complex Injection (ABLC) in solid-organ transplant recipients with invasive fungal infections

Background: Fungal infections following solid-organ transplantation are a major source of morbidity and mortality. This report describes the efficacy and safety of Amphotericin B Lipid Complex Injection (ABLC) in solid-organ transplant recipients.
Methods: Three open-label, second-line treatment studies evaluated ABLC as a treatment for severe, life-threatening mycoses in patients who were refractory to or intolerant to conventional antifungal (mostly amphotericin B [AmB]) therapy or had pre-existing renal disease.
Results: The 79 solid-organ transplant recipients (25 heart, 20 liver, 17 kidney, 11 lung, 5 multiple, 1 pancreas) who received ABLC in these studies had the following fungal infections: aspergillosis (n=39); candidiasis (n=20); zygomycosis (n=8); cryptococcosis and histoplasmosis (n=3 each); and blastomycosis, cladosporiosis, fusariosis, Bipolaris hawaiiensis , Dactylaria gallopava , and an unspecified fungal infection (n=1 each). The median duration of ABLC therapy was 28 d (1–178 d). The daily dose ranged between 1.6 and 7.4 mg/kg (median, 4.6 mg/kg). The clinical response rate for the patients who could be assessed was 58% (39/67). Clinical response rates for heart, liver, kidney, and lung recipients were 59, 60, 67, and 40%, respectively; response rates for aspergillosis and candidiasis were 47 and 71%, respectively. Forty-six of the 79 patients (58%) survived for more than 28 d after the last dose of ABLC. Mean baseline serum creatinine was 3.2 mg/dL; 64 patients (81%) had stable (n=37) or improved (n=27) serum creatinine at the end of treatment.
Conclusions: ABLC is safe and effective treatment for fungal infections in solid-organ transplant recipients. Its renal-sparing properties are particularly suited for this high-risk population for renal failure.     

Targeted Prophylaxis With Amphotericin B Lipid Complex in Liver Transplantation

The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate a strategy in which prophylaxis with amphotericin B lipid complex at 3 different dosages was targeted to liver transplant recipients at high risk for the development of invasive fungal infection (IFI). High risk was defined as a postoperative requirement for prolonged (≥5 days) intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. Consecutive high-risk patients were administered prophylaxis with amphotericin B lipid complex from day 5 after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) until ICU discharge or death. The first 10 eligible patients were administered 5 mg/kg/d, the next 10 patients were administered 2.5 mg/kg/d, and a final 10 patients were administered 1 mg/kg/d. Drug safety and efficacy were assessed before each dosage reduction. During the study period, 130 adult patients underwent 137 OLTs. Thirty patients fulfilled the entry criteria and were administered prophylaxis with amphotericin B lipid complex. No patient developed proven IFI during prophylaxis. Cultures from normally sterile sites (blood and abdominal drain fluid) always showed negative results. All fungal isolates were sensitive in vitro to amphotericin B. There was no significant difference in colonization scores among the groups of patients administered different dosages of amphotericin B lipid complex. No death, serious adverse reaction, or nephrotoxicity was attributed to amphotericin B lipid complex. We conclude that prophylaxis with amphotericin B lipid complex targeted to patients requiring prolonged ICU treatment after OLT appears to be well tolerated and may prevent IFI. Our current policy is to use amphotericin B lipid complex, 1 mg/kg/d, as antifungal prophylaxis in this high-risk group. (Liver Transpl 2000;6:588-595.)     

Effect of prophylaxis on fungal infection and costs for high-risk liver transplant recipients.

We sought to determine whether the prophylactic use of amphotericin B products (conventional amphotericin B and liposomal amphotericin B) reduces the incidence of fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients, and if so, whether this lowers the cost of care. The study sample comprised 232 adult orthotopic liver transplants performed from 1994 to 2005 at a single center for patients classified as being at high risk for fungal infections. High-risk patients who received transplants with a prophylaxis regimen of amphotericin B (n=58 transplants) were compared with high-risk patients who received no prophylaxis (n=174 transplants). Fungal infections occurred in 3 transplants (5.17%) of those who received amphotericin B and 28 transplants (16.09%) in those without prophylaxis (P=0.0432). Regression models were used to analyze fungal infection and costs for the 232 high-risk transplants. Failure to offer prophylaxis conferred a 4-fold greater risk of fungal infection (P=0.046) compared with those who received amphotericin B. A fungal infection in a high-risk recipient increased mean costs by 46.48%. The indirect effect of prophylaxis (operating through infection reduction) is estimated to reduce overall costs in high-risk patients by 8.73%.     

Randomized controlled trial of oral itraconazole solution versus intravenous/oral fluconazole for prevention of fungal infections in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant recipients at high risk for serious fungal infections frequently receive fluconazole or an amphotericin B preparation for antifungal prophylaxis. Because of concerns about fungal resistance with fluconazole, safety with amphotericin B, and the cost of lipid formulations of amphotericin, alternative prophylactic regimens are needed. In this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of oral itraconazole solution with intravenous/oral fluconazole for prevention of fungal infections. METHODS: Adult liver transplant recipients were randomized to receive either oral itraconazole solution (200 mg every 12 hr) or intravenous/oral fluconazole (400 mg every 24 hr). Each study drug was started immediately before transplant surgery and continued for 10 weeks after transplantation. Patients were evaluated for fungal colonization, proven invasive or superficial fungal infection, drug-related side effects, and death. RESULTS: Fungal colonization decreased from baseline to week 8 after transplantation in both the itraconazole patients (67% to 25%, P<0.001) and the fluconazole patients (77% to 30%, P<0.001). Proven fungal infection developed in 9 (9%) of 97 itraconazole patients and in 4 (4%) of 91 fluconazole patients (P =0.25). The number of proven invasive fungal infections (seven with itraconazole [7%], three with fluconazole [3%]) and proven superficial fungal infections (two with itraconazole [2%], one with fluconazole [1%]) were also similar in both groups of patients. Organisms causing infection were (four patients), (three patients), and species (two patients) in the itraconazole group and (two patients), (one patient), and species (one patient) in the fluconazole group. Mortality from fungal infection was very low and occurred in only 1 (0.5%) of 188 patients. Except for more frequent gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) with itraconazole, both itraconazole and fluconazole were well tolerated and not associated with any hepatotoxicity. Mean trough plasma concentrations of itraconazole were greater than 250 ng/mL throughout the study and were not affected by H -receptor antagonists or antacids. CONCLUSION: Oral itraconazole solution has adequate bioavailability in liver transplant recipients for effective antifungal prophylaxis. Similar to fluconazole, prophylactic oral itraconazole decreases fungal colonization and is associated with a low incidence of serious or fatal fungal infections. Except for gastrointestinal side effects, oral itraconazole solution is well tolerated and has no significant hepatotoxicity.     

原位肝移植术后真菌感染43例次诊治体会

目的 探讨原位肝移植术后真菌感染的诊断、治疗及预防。方法 回顾总结为175位患者所施行的180次原位肝移植的临床资料，并对可能导致真菌感染的危险因素进行统计学分析。结果 全组29例患者出现43例次真菌感染，感染率为16．6％(29／175)。其中念珠菌占98％(42／43)，曲霉菌2％(1／43)。发病中位时间为术后26d(3～96d)。常见感染部位依次是肺部37％(16／43)，肠管19％(8／43)和血液16％(7／43)。26例患者接受氟康唑治疗，感染严重的8例患者改用脂质体两性霉素B治疗。病死率45％(13／29)，直接与真菌感染有关的病死率为4．0％(7／175)。全胃肠外营养时间较长、抗生素治疗超过3周或出现肝动脉并发症的患者真菌感染的发生率显著增加。结论 真菌感染是影响肝移植生存率的重要原因之一。最常见的感染部位和病原菌分别是肺部和念珠菌。减少各种危险因素将有助于降低真菌感染的发生率。早期诊断和及时治疗是治愈的关键，严重的真菌感染应及时给予两性霉素B或其脂质体治疗。     

Treatment of candidosis in severely injured adults with short-course, low-dose amphotericin B

Thirty-three (0.7%) of 4,818 trauma patients admitted between January 1, 1987, and July 1, 1989, developed invasive candidosis requiring IV antifungal therapy. All patients were seriously traumatized. Before developing candidosis, all patients had documented bacterial infections. These infections were generally polymicrobial and were treated with multiple broad-spectrum antibiotics (an average of 5.4 antibiotics for 17.2 days). Twenty-eight (85%) of 33 patients received enteral feedings for an average of 11 days +/- 1.5 (SEM) before developing candidosis and 24 (73%) received NG/oral nystatin for an average of 7.6 days +/- 0.9 before developing candidosis. All patients with candidosis were treated with intravenous amphotericin B: cumulative dose of 157.3 mg +/- 31.3 mg given over 10 days +/- 1.1. One patient developed recurrent candidosis despite NG/oral prophylaxis and enteral feedings. Six patients (18%) died due to sepsis and multiple organ failure. The patients who died did not objectively differ from the survivors. Candidosis is an infrequent infection in severely injured patients. Candidosis was invariably preceded by treatment with multiple broad-spectrum antibiotics for a variety of polymicrobial bacterial infections. NG/oral nystatin and enteral feedings did not prevent candidosis, in contrast to widely accepted beliefs. Amphotericin B therapy was safe. Recurrent candidosis was unusual. Candida infections had a high mortality rate associated with multiple blood transfusions and prolonged hospitalization. Candidosis represents a sign of severe injury and illness but can be amenable to prompt, aggressive treatment.     

Fungal infections in transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab

Recently, we have used an anti-T-cell agent, alemtuzumab, as induction or conversion therapy to achieve a calcineurin (CNI) and steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen. We identified recipients who developed systemic fungal infections after the initiation of alemtuzumab and looked at their outcomes. The study population consisted of all pancreas transplant recipients who received alemtuzumab. Only invasive fungal infections were included in the analysis (eg, fungemia, meningitis, or pneumonia; fungal urinary tract infections were excluded). The organism was confirmed by culture, histopathology, or latex antigen test. Between February 2003 and February 2004, a total of 121 pancreas transplant recipients received alemtuzumab-56 as part of induction, and 65 as part of conversion. Of these, 8 (6.6%) developed an invasive fungal infection; 2 (3.6%) recipients as part of induction therapy and 6 (9.2%) as part of conversion therapy. Mean recipient age was 42.1 years. The mean length of time from alemtuzumab administration (first dose) to the diagnosis of the fungal infection was 115.9 days (range 5 to 318). The organisms identified initially were: Cryptococcus, Histoplasma, Aspergillus, and Candida. Overall, 3 (38%) of the eight patients died during ongoing treatment of their fungal infection: two from sepsis, one due to myocardial infarction. The other five recipients were treated successfully and have functioning grafts. The initial therapeutic agents used included: amphotericin B/liposomal AMB (n = 6), voriconazole (n = 3), capsofungin (n = 2), and fluconazole (n = 1). The use of alemtuzumab as induction or conversion therapy in pancreas transplant recipients may predispose patients to the development of systemic fungal infections. It would be important to determine what the most appropriate prophylaxis regimen would be for these patients.     

Role of Liposomal Amphotericin B Prophylaxis After Liver Transplantation Compared With Fluconazole for High-Risk Patients. Impact on Infections and Mortality Within one Year

Background

Fungal infections are still one of the most important issue in liver transplant patients, contributing considerably to both morbidity and mortality. Few studies have been published comparing antifungal protocols for their impact on liver transplant (OLT) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of liposomal amphotericin B compared with fluconazole prophylaxis on morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation.

Methods

We evaluated all 44 patients undergoing OLT from January 2006 to January 2009 who were enrolled and randomized to undergo treatment with Amphotericin B (3 mg/kg/d; group A = 25 patients) or fluconazole (800 mg Loading dose and thereafter 400 mg/d according to renal parameters and immunosuppressant trough levels; group B = 18 patients) for at least 7 to 14 days with 12 months follow-up after liver transplantation. A multivariate analysis assessed factors associated with infections and mortality.

Results

Neither antifungal prophylaxis was associated with a fungal episode; however, group A patients experienced fewer bacterial infectious episodes (Mann-Whitney U test P < .05). Furthermore, no renal impairment was observed in either groups. Nonetheless, patients undergoing fluconazole prophylaxis showed significant increases in immunosuppressive trough levels requiring dose adjustment.

Conclusion

We observed comparable results of fluconazole and liposomal amphotericin B to prevent invasive fungal infections throughout 12 months after surgery. The latter drug was associated with fewer bacterial infections after liver transplantation.     

Chronic amphotericin B nephrotoxicity in the rat: protective effect of calcium channel blockade

Amphotericin B is used despite predictable nephrotoxicity because it remains the most efficacious agent currently available for systemic fungal infections. It has been previously shown that calcium channel blockade prevents renal vasoconstriction and blunts the fall in glomerular filtration rate during acute amphotericin B infusion in the rat. Therefore, the effect of cotreatment with diltiazem on nephrotoxicity during chronic daily amphotericin therapy in rats was studied. Rats were given diltiazem (45 mg/kg, 1 h before and 1 h after amphotericin) or vehicle by gastric tube; and amphotericin B (5 mg/kg/day i.p.) for 10 days. Control rats received corresponding vehicles by gastric tube and daily i.p. infection. Renal function was determined 24 h after the last dose of amphotericin or vehicle. Serum creatinine rose significantly in rats receiving amphotericin alone (initial versus final, 0.50 +/- 0.07 versus 1.09 +/- 0.20 mg/dL; P less than 0.05) but not with amphotericin plus diltiazem (0.54 +/- 0.11 versus 0.84 +/- 0.23 mg/dL; P was not significant). Amphotericin rats had a marked decrease in glomerular filtration rate (amphotericin versus control, 0.28 +/- 0.04 versus 1.23 +/- 0.08 mL/min/g kidney wt; P less than 0.05) and renal plasma flow (1.63 +/- 0.19 versus 3.50 +/- 0.40 mL/min/g kidney wt; P less than 0.05). These adverse renal hemodynamic effects were prevented by cotreatment with diltiazem (amphotericin plus diltiazem; glomerular filtration rate, 0.82 +/- 0.18 mL/min/g kidney wt; P less than 0.05 versus amphotericin; P was not significant versus control; renal plasma flow, 3.24 +/- 0.63 mL/min/g kidney wt; P less than 0.05 versus amphotericin; P was not significant versus control).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antifungal Prophylaxis with Voriconazole or Itraconazole in Lung Transplant Recipients: Hepatotoxicity and Effectiveness

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are common after lung transplantation and there are limited data for the use of antifungal prophylaxis in these patients. Our aim was to compare the safety and describe the effectiveness of universal prophylaxis with two azole regimens in lung transplant recipients.
This is a retrospective study in lung transplant recipients from July 2003 to July 2006 who received antifungal prophylaxis with itraconazole or voriconazole plus inhaled amphotericin B to compare the incidence of hepatotoxicity. Secondary outcomes include describing the incidence of IFI, clinical outcomes after IFI and mortality.
Sixty-seven consecutive lung transplants received antifungal prophylaxis, 32 itraconazole and 35 voriconazole and inhaled amphotericin B. There were no significant differences between groups in the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) score at the time of transplantation, demographic characteristics, comorbidities and concomitant use of hepatotoxic medications. Hepatotoxicity occurred in 12 patients receiving voriconazole and inhaled amphotericin B and in no patients receiving itraconazole (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups with regard to the percentage of transplants with IFI, but one case of zygomycosis occurred in a transplant treated with voriconazole. Voriconazole prophylaxis after lung transplantation was associated with a higher incidence of hepatotoxicity and similar clinical effectiveness when compared to itraconazole.     

Invasive aspergillosis in a patient with aplastic anemia receiving amphotericin B

Invasive mycotic infections are becoming more commonplace in immune-compromised hosts. Aspergillus species is the most commonly encountered fungal genus in our environment causing paranasal sinus fungal infection. Aspergillus paranasal sinus infections in the healthy host are readily treated and controlled. In the immune-compromised host this common organism can rapidly become fatal even if recognized and treated appropriately. We present a case history of a patient who died from her disease despite radical surgery and antifungicidal therapy. Recent methods for early diagnosis will be reviewed. Only one other case has been reported in the literature of a patient developing fulminant aspergillosis sinusitis while receiving amphotericin B.     

Effect of amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) in very low birth weight infants

The aim of this retrospective, case-control study was to determine the effect of the amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) on serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), sodium (Na), and potassium (K) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Medical records of all VLBW infants who were admitted to our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between May 1998 and May 2006 and had received ABLC for at least 2 weeks were reviewed for patient demographics, use of medications (ABLC, diuretics, xanthines, indomethacin, vancomycin, gentamicin, pressors, and inotropes), fluid intake, urinary output, and serum electrolytes. Thirty-five patients who received ABLC were identified and matched by gestational age (GA) to 35 patients who served as controls. Infants who received ABLC had an average GA of 25.7 +/- 2.1 weeks and a birth weight of 764 +/- 196 g. Between day 1 and 14 of ABLC treatment, the BUN decreased from 17.5 +/- 11.5 to 10.5 +/- 6.8 mg/dl (p = 0.01), the SCr varied between 0.78 +/- 0.32 and 0.69 +/- 0.32 mg/dl, Na varied between 136.6 +/- 5.8 and 137.8 +/- 3.6 mEq/l, and K varied between 4.8 +/- 0.9 and 4.9 +/- 0.6 mEq/l, respectively. Based on these results, we conclude that treatment with ABLC for 2 weeks did not increase BUN or SCr, nor decrease Na or K in VLBW infants.