No interaction between factor V Leiden and hyperhomocysteinemia or MTHFR 677TT genotype in venous thrombosis. Results of a meta-analysis of published studies and a large case-only study

Homocysteine may have a thrombogenic effect through inhibition of inactivation of factor Va by activated protein C. Because factor V Leiden also leads to resistance of factor V to activated protein C, it would be possible that both factors show interaction for the risk of venous thrombosis. This has been reported in some studies, but not in others. We performed a metaanalysis to investigate a possible interaction between factor V Leiden and hyperhomocysteinemia, including 825 subjects with venous thrombosis and 2,109 controls, for the risk of venous thrombosis. In addition, we assessed a possible interaction between factor V Leiden and MTHFR 677TT genotype (the most common genetic determinant of homocysteine levels), including 2,547 subjects with venous thrombosis and 4,327 controls. We also investigated the interaction effect of factor V Leiden and hyperhomocysteinemia in a large case-only study using data of the VITRO study, including 2,077 subjects with first-time venous thrombosis. The meta-analysis yielded no evidence for additive or multiplicative interaction between factor V Leiden and hyperhomocysteinemia [relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) -1.77 (95%CI -8.61 to 5.08) and multiplicative interaction term 0.86 (95%CI 0.35 to 2.14)]. The case-only study also showed no interaction effect [0.58 (95%CI 0.29 to 1.16)]. Also the metaanalysis on factor V Leiden and MTHFR 677TT yielded no evidence of interaction; RERI 0.13 (95%CI -3.60 to 3.86) and multiplicative interaction term 1.23 (95%CI 0.72 to 2.11). Both the meta-analyses of published studies and a large case-only study did not show evidence for interaction between factor V Leiden and hyperhomocysteinemia for risk of venous thrombosis.     

Thrombophilic risk factors and homocysteine levels in Behçet's disease in eastern Spain and their association with thrombotic events

Beh?et's disease (BD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder in which thrombosis occurs in about 30% of patients. The prothrombotic mechanisms are unknown. Thrombophilic defects and hyperhomocysteinaemia may be involved in the pathogenesis of thrombotic events, although results have been controversial. Moreover, no information is available on this issue for eastern Spain. We studied the prevalence of inherited and acquired thrombophilic risk factors in 79 patients with BD (43 men, 36 women) who had (n = 23) or did not have (n = 56) thrombosis, and in 84 healthy control subjects (42 men, 42 women). Risk factors examined were antithrombin, protein C and protein S levels, factor V Leiden, the prothrombin G20210A mutation, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism, and acquired thrombophilic risk factors, including anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, and serum homocysteine levels. There were no differences between patients and controls in any of the parameters studied. When we studied BD patients with and without thrombotic events, the only thrombophilic defect that differed was the prothrombin G20210A mutation: Three out of 23 patients with thrombosis were carriers, compared with none of 56 patients without thrombosis (p = 0.022). Two of the three carriers developed catastrophic or recurrent thrombotic episodes; one was a homozygous carrier of the G20210A prothrombin mutation and the other was doubly heterozygous for the G20210A prothrombin mutation and factor V Leiden. A meta-analysis demonstrated an association of factor V Leiden and prothrombin mutation with thrombosis in BD. When studies from Turkey were excluded from the meta-analysis, only the prothrombin G20210A mutation was associated with thrombosis.     

Cerebral venous thrombosis: Incidence in prothrombotic states

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare clotting event with a highly variable clinical presentation. Local and systemic infections, collagen vascular disorders, malignancies, pregnancy and puerperium, and the use of oral contraceptives (OC) have been strongly associated with CVT. It is clear that a minority of individuals with the above conditions develop CVT. Therefore, inherited or acquired prothrombotic states may play a key role in the development of this disease.In recent years, the discovery of new thrombophilic risk factors such as factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene mutation has contributed to the understanding of the environment-gene interaction in the development of thrombosis. Several studies have found factor V Leiden to be the most common coagulation abnormality in patients with CVT, with a prevalence of 20% to 25%. Immobilization, puerperium, or the use of oral contraceptives, factors considered to increase the risk of developing thromboses, were present in the majority of the cases.The odds ratio for CVT in women heterozygous for the prothrombin gene mutation taking OC was 150, with an odds ratio of 10 for carriers of the mutation and 22 for OC users, respectively. Hence, the inherited or acquired hypercoagulable states establish the conditions for thrombosis to develop when certain factors are present. Numerous cases of factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutation in patients with CVT during pregnancy and puerperium have been reported, and the prevalence of prothrombotic risk factors appears to be similar to the ones in patients with extracerebral thrombosis during the same period.CVT in neonates and young infants is a rare, but well-recognized disorder with a high morbidity rate. The prevalence of congenital and inherited prothrombotic risk factors in children with CVT is comparable or even higher than in the adult population.Although advances have been made in the characterization of prothrombotic risk factors in patients with CVT, many cases still are considered idiopathic. Larger, well-designed, prospective studies will allow practitioners to determine the population at risk for CVT. Therefore, adequate measures can be taken in order to prevent this severe thrombotic disorder.     

Increased rate of factor V Leiden mutation in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis

We investigated the association between cerebral venous thrombosis and hereditary resistance to activated protein C (APC) in 12 consecutive German patients with non-fatal cerebral venous thrombosis and in 187 controls without a history of thrombotic disorder. Three patients (25%) had a mutation in the factor V Leiden gene against only one subject in the control group. This difference was significant (P<0.05), with an odds ratio of 11.7 (1.5–87 ; 95% confidence interval). Two patients carrying the mutation had additional common risk factors for thrombosis, and 2 had a positive family history of thromboembolism. We conclude that inherited APC resistance by a mutation in factor V Leiden is an important risk factor in non-fatal cerebral venous thrombosis. We recommend testing for APC resistance and, if abnormal for factor V Leiden mutation in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis. Received: 27 February 1997 Received in revised form: 14 August 1997 Accepted: 17 November 1997     

Factor V Leiden and hemophilia

Several inherited prothrombotic risk factors have been identified so far. Among them, the factor V (FV) Leiden mutation causes a reduced ability of activated protein C to inactivate activated FV and is the most frequent genetic predisposing factor for venous thromboembolism. However, the high prevalence of FV Leiden (up to 15%) in the Caucasian population suggests that this mutation might confer an evolutionary survival advantage. Indeed, there is mounting evidence about the role of FV Leiden in modulating the clinical phenotype of some physiological and pathological conditions, including hemophilia. The existing literature on the interaction between FV Leiden and hemophilia-related factor VIII or IX mutations is analyzed in this review focusing on the clinical effects and possible pathogenic mechanisms. In summary, current evidence suggests that this prothrombotic mutation may compensate for the low factor VIII or IX levels, resulting in more efficient thrombin generation and ensuing attenuation of clinical symptoms. On the other hand, the association of this prothrombotic mutation with other acquired or inherited thrombophilic factors might overcome the congenital bleeding tendency in hemophiliacs, thereby increasing the risk of thrombotic complications.     

Prothrombotic states in retinal artery and vein occlusions

An increasing number of studies have examined the role of prothrombotic states in retinal vascular occlusions. Large case-controlled studies have revealed a cardiovascular risk profile for retinal venous occlusions. Considerable evidence implicates altered rheology, especially increased plasma viscosity and elevated hematocrit, in retinal venous thrombosis. The documented role of specific genetic thrombophilic factors in retinal vascular occlusions is limited. The majority of studies have assessed the role of factor V Leiden. These studies show that screening all patients with retinal venous occlusions for factor V Leiden is not indicated. Screening for factor V Leiden may be helpful in 2 uncommon situations: in patients with a retinal venous thrombosis and a personal or family history of thromboembolic disease, and in patients with recurrent retinal venous occlusions. The extent of the thrombophilic laboratory assessment is based on the age of the patient and the degree of vascular risk factors. Older patients with extensive vascular diseases require little investigation, whereas younger patients with no vascular risk factors require aggressive investigation.     

Interaction between hyperhomocysteinemia,mutated methylenetetrahydrofolatereductase (MTHFR) and inherited thrombophilic factors in recurrent venous thrombosis

Venous thrombosis is a multicausal disease involving acquired and genetic factors. In this study we investigated a possible interaction between hyperhomocysteinemia (fasting or postload) and factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A on the risk of recurrent venous thrombosis. We also looked at the risk due to mutations in the MTHFR-gene (C677T and A1298C). We performed a case-control study in 171 patients with a history of recurrent venous thrombosis and 461 control subjects from the general population. Hyperhomocysteinemia (fasting or 6 h after an oral methionine load) was defined as a homocysteine concentration above the 90th percentile of the distributions in the control group. The odds ratio (adjusted for age and sex) for recurrent venous thrombosis was 1.8 (95% CI: 1.1 to 3.0) for fasting hyperhomocysteinemia, 5.1 (95% CI: 3.0 to 8.6) for factor V Leiden and 1.8 (95% CI: 0.7 to 4.2) for prothrombin G20210A. We found 14 patients and 3 controls with both hyperhomocysteinemia and factor V Leiden, which yielded an odds ratio of 11.6 (95% CI: 3.2 to 42.5). We found no interaction between hyperhomocysteinemia and prothrombin G20210A. The relative risk for MTHFR 677CT was 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1 to 2.4) and for MTHFR 677TT was 1.4 (95% CI: 0.7 to 2.8). The combined risk for MTHFR 677TT and factor V Leiden was 18.7 (95% CI: 3.3 to 108). We conclude that hyperhomocysteinemia and factor V Leiden are risk factors for recurrent venous thrombosis. The risk of thrombosis appeared high for individuals who had both risk factors.     

Combined effect of factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A on the risk of venous thromboembolism--pooled analysis of 8 case-control studies including 2310 cases and 3204 controls. Study Group for Pooled-Analysis in Venous Thromboembolism

Factor V Leiden and factor II G20210A mutations are two frequent genetic risk factors involved in venous thromboembolism (VTE). The goal of this pooled analysis of 8 case-control studies, comprising a total of 2310 cases and 3204 controls, was to precisely estimate the risk of VTE in patients bearing both mutations (double heterozygotes). Odds ratios for VTE were 4.9 (95% CI; 4.1-5.9) for the factor V Leiden and 3.8 (3.0-4.9) for the factor II G20210A mutation. Fifty-one cases (2.2%) and none of the controls were double heterozygotes. The odds ratio for venous thrombosis in double heterozygotes was 20.0 (11.1-36.1). Twelve percent of patients heterozygous for factor V Leiden were also heterozygous for factor II G20210A and conversely 23% of patients heterozygous for factor II G20210A were also heterozygous for factor V Leiden. Furthermore, in this large population we analyzed the effect of oral contraceptive (OC) in women carrying one of these mutations. Odds ratio for VTE associated with OC was 2.29 (1.72-3.04). In factor V Leiden carriers using OC, the odds ratio for VTE was 10.25 (5.69-1 8.45). The odds ratio of the association of factor II mutation and OC use was 7.14 (3.39-15.04). Finally, we also confirmed that the frequency of factor V Leiden was lower in patients with pulmonary embolism than in patients with deep vein thrombosis without PE (odds ratio 0.69). Conversely, factor II G20210A mutation was equally balanced in both patient groups.     

Retinal vein occlusion: a form of venous thrombosis or a complication of atherosclerosis? A meta-analysis of thrombophilic factors

Previous studies have shown an increased risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in patients with hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus. Literature on the association between thrombophilic factors and RVO consists of small studies and case reports. The objective was to determine the relationship between thrombophilic risk factors and RVO. Thrombophilic risk factors analyzed were hyperhomocysteinemia, MTHFR gene mutation, factor V Leiden mutation, protein C and S deficiency, antithrombin deficiency, prothrombin gene mutation, anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant. For all currently known thrombophilic risk factors odds ratios for RVO were calculated as estimates of relative risk. The odds ratios were 8.9 (95% CI 5.7 - 13.7) for hyperhomocysteinemia, 3.9 (95% CI 2.3 - 6.7) for anticardiolipin antibodies, 1.2 (95% CI 0.9 - 1.6) for MTHFR, 1.5 (95% CI 1.0 - 2.2) for factor V Leiden mutation and 1.6 (95% CI 0.8 - 3.2) for prothrombin gene mutation. In conclusion, regarding thrombophilic risk factors and RVO there is only evidence for an association with hyperhomocysteinemia and anticardiolipin antibodies, factors that are known as risk factors for venous thrombosis as well as for arterial vascular disease. The minor effect of factor V Leiden mutation and the protrombin gene mutation (risk factors for venous thrombosis only) suggests that atherosclerosis might be an important factor in the development of CRVO.     

Interrelation of hyperhomocysteinemia and inherited risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Results from the E.D.I.TH. study: a hospital-based case-control study

BACKGROUND: Moderate hyperhomocysteinemia and factor V Leiden mutation are among the most prevalent risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The hypothesis of an interaction between those risks has been raised and conflicting results were reported. METHODS: We designed a hospital-based case-control study to test the interaction between Factor V Leiden and fasting serum total homocysteine (tHcy). We have also analysed the G20210A prothrombin gene variant. This study enrolled 904 hospitalised patients who had an objectively proven deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism as well as 904 hospitalised control patients matched for gender, age and major acquired risk factor for VTE. RESULTS: Our data did not detect any multiplicative interaction between hyperhomocysteinemia (>15 mumol/L) and factor V Leiden mutation or G20210A prothrombin gene variant. Odds ratios (95% CI) were 4.0 (1.5-11) and 6.0 (1.3-27) for the combined effect of hyperhomocysteinemia with either factor V Leiden mutation or G20210A prothrombin gene variant, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current data provide further knowledge in relationship between hyperhomocysteinemia and inherited risk factors, such as factor V Leiden mutation and G20210A prothrombin gene variant. As those risk factors are not so rare among Caucasians, a better estimate of the risk related to double exposure might help to optimise venous thromboembolism prevention.     

Risk of pregnancy-related venous thrombosis in carriers of severe inherited thrombophilia

Homozygous carriers of factor V Leiden have an approximately 80-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis. Also double heterozygous carriers of both the factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene mutations are at high thrombotic risk. The magnitude of the risk of venous thrombosis in pregnant women with the two severe thrombophilic conditions has not been estimated so far. We performed a multicenter retrospective family study in women with homozygous factor V Leiden, double heterozygous factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene mutation, and women with normal coagulation. Only relatives of index patients with thrombosis formed the study cohort. Fifteen homozygous and 39 double heterozygous women were compared to 182 women with normal coagulation. Venous thrombosis occurred in 3 of 19, 2 of 50 and 1 of 221 pregnancies, respectively. One thrombotic episode occurred in the third trimester, the remaining 5 in the postpartum. The prevalence of venous thrombosis was 15.8% (95% CI 3.4-39.6) for homozygotes. 4.0% (95% CI 0.5-13.7) for double heterozygotes and 0.5% for women with normal coagulation. The relative risk of pregnancy-related venous thrombosis was 41.3 (95% CI 4.1-419.7) for homozygous and 9.2 (95% CI 0.8-103.2) for double heterozygous carriers. In conclusion, homozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and, to a lesser extent, double heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and of the prothrombin mutation have an increased risk of venous thrombosis during pregnancy, particularly high during the postpartum period. On the basis of these findings we recommend that these women receive anticoagulant prophylaxis at least in the postpartum, that should perhaps be extended to the whole pregnancy in homozygous carriers.     

Case-control study of the frequency of thrombophilic disorders in couples with late foetal loss and no thrombotic antecedent--the N?mes Obstetricians and Haematologists Study5 (NOHA5).

BACKGROUND: Women with familial thrombophilia have an increased risk of still birth. We postulated that the presence of asymptomatic risk factors for venous thrombosis might be a risk factor for late foetal loss. METHODS: We performed a case-control study on the prevalence of heritable thrombophilic defects, of antiphospholipid-related markers and of the C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene in patients with at least one episode of late unexplained foetal loss and in control women with successful pregnancies. Partners of cases and controls were also studied. Written conclusions of the pathological examination of the placentas, when available, were also reviewed. RESULTS: We found at least one positive biological risk factor for venous thrombosis in 21.1% of the patients and in 3.9% of the controls (p < 10(-4)). In women, the crude odds ratio for still birth associated with any positive biological risk factor for venous thrombosis was 5.5, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) [3.4-9.0]. No difference was found between partners of cases and controls (5.2% and 4.7%). Using conditional logistic regression analysis, 4 adjusted risk factors for still birth remained: protein S deficiency, positive anti beta2 glycoprotein I IgG antibodies, positive anticardiolipin IgG antibodies and the factor V Leiden mutation. The C677T mutation in the MTHFR gene was not an individual risk factor but an homozygous genotype was strongly associated with the former 4 risk factors (16.8% of patients vs. 0.9% of controls). In women with such associations, still births always occurred in absence of folic acid supplementation during pregnancy. Available conclusions of pathological analysis of placentas were found to have a very high proportion of "maternal vascular disease of the placenta" in patients with at least one positive risk marker for thromboembolism, specially in case of association with the C677T MTHFR homozygous genotype, compared to patients with negative markers (p <10(-4)). CONCLUSIONS: Late foetal loss, through placenta thrombosis, may sometimes be the consequence of a maternal multifactorial prothrombotic state associating traditional heritable or acquired thrombosis risk factors to conditions predisposing to an acute mild hyperhomocysteinaemia (coexistence of a genetic predisposition with late pregnancy-related increased folate needs).     

Effects of hereditary and acquired risk factors of venous thrombosis on a thrombin generation-based APC resistance test

BACKGROUND: Several hereditary and acquired risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are associated with impaired down-regulation of thrombin formation via the protein C pathway. To identify individuals at risk, functional tests are needed that estimate the risk to develop venous thrombosis. METHOD: We determined the effects of hereditary and acquired risk factors of venous thrombosis on an APC resistance test that quantifies the influence of APC on the time integral of thrombin formation (the endogenous thrombin potential, ETP) initiated in plasma via the extrinsic coagulation pathway. APC sensitivity ratios (APCsr) were determined in plasma from carriers of factor V(Leiden) (n = 56) or prothrombin G20210A (n = 18), of individuals deficient in antithrombin (n = 9), protein C (n = 7) or protein S (n = 14) and of women exposed to acquired risk factors such as hormone replacement therapy (n = 49), oral contraceptive use (n = 126) or pregnancy (n = 35). We also analysed combinations of risk factors (n = 60). RESULTS: The thrombin generation-based APC resistance test was sensitive for the factor V(Leiden) and prothrombin G20210A mutation, to protein S deficiency, hormone replacement therapy, oral contraceptive use and pregnancy. The assay was not influenced by antithrombin or protein C deficiency. The presence of more than one risk factor of venous thrombosis resulted in more pronounced APC resistance. The APCsr of individuals with a single or combined risk factors of VTE correlated well with reported risk increases. INTERPRETATION: The thrombin generation-based APC resistance test identifies individuals at risk for venous thrombosis due to acquired risk factors and/or hereditary thrombophilic disorders that affect the protein C pathway.     

Factor V Leiden mutation and pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism: what is the exact risk? Results from a meta-analysis

The magnitude of the association of factor V Leiden mutation with pregnancy-related venous thrombosis remains unclear. Our objective was to undertake a systematic review and a metaanalysis of the literature to estimate precisely the association of factorV Leiden mutation with the risk of first, or recurrent, pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism. Studies published before October 2005 were identified by Medline((R)). Using both fixed and random effect models, odds ratios (OR) with accompanying 95% confidential intervals (CI) were calculated for the factor V Leiden mutation and the clinical end-point (Yusuf-Peto adaptation of the Mantel-Haenszel, DerSimonian and Laird method). We identified 13 studies including 7 cohorts and 6 casecontrol studies relating to factor V Leiden and pregnancy-related venous thrombosis. The results from the cohorts showed a pooled OR of 4.46 (95% CI, 1.82-10.94; 7,879 pooled women), with no evidence of statistical heterogeneity (p = 0.36), for the risk of a first venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or the postpartum period associated with the factor V Leiden mutation. Case-control studies revealed a higher risk (OR 8.6, 95% CI, 5.85-12.63; 1,433 [corrected] pooled women) with significant heterogeneity (p < 0.005). Because of insufficient data, an analysis for the risk of recurrence could not be performed. Our findings emphasize the fact that limited data are available on this topic. This meta-analysis provides clinicians with an estimate of the average risk of a first thrombosis occurring during pregnancy in women carrying the factor V Leiden to assist the management of such women.     

Basilar artery thrombosis in a child heterozygous for factor V Leiden mutation

Activated protein C resistance, usually because of factor V Leiden mutation, is considered to be the most common hereditary prothrombotic condition. A 9-year-old male with a basilar artery stroke and activated protein C resistance is described. The patient, found to be heterozygous for factor V Leiden mutation, is one of several recent reports that suggest that activated protein C resistance is an important risk factor for spontaneous arterial thrombosis in infancy and childhood.     

Acquired and Congenital Risk Factors associated with Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

The mechanistic paradigm underlying venous thrombosis at atypical locations stems from the observation that most events occur as a result of pathology of the organ system drained by the involved venous segment. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis stands apart as an exception to this general rule. Although brain and sinus pathology are well established causes, these combined variables account for approximately one third of cases. The marked female preponderance and strong association with gender specific risk factors including hormonal manipulation, pregnancy and the puerperium are particularly notable. Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations and hyperhomocysteinemia represent important risk factors particularly when combined with acquired variables. The association with oral contraception use and the prothrombin G20210A gene mutation may offer insights into the anatomic predilection for cerebral venous sinus involvement as compared to venous thrombosis of the lower extremities. The intent of this review is to summarize the corporate literature of both acquired and congenital risk factors associated with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in order to assist clinicians in their search for underlying mechanisms and to risk stratify patients for anticoagulation treatment duration and risk of recurrent thrombosis.     

Neuropsychological manifestations in a case of bilateral thalamic infarction.

Neuropsychological manifestation has been reported with lesions of the anterior and non-specific thalamic nuclei and mammilothalamic tract (MMT). These have been reported in the setting of arterial infarction and/or haemorrhage. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of brain infarction. It occurs in the setting of oral contraceptive administration or pregnancy. Inherited thrombophilias are documented risk factors. The most frequent being heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation. We report a single case of bilateral thalamic infarction due to cerebral vein and sinus thrombosis. Clinically the case manifested with memory impairment and dysexecutive symptoms. Predisposing factor for venous thrombosis was a homozygous factor V Leiden mutation. The patient was treated with anticoagulation and made a good recovery.     

Cerebrovascular disorders in children with the factor V Leiden mutation.

Since 1995, at least 128 children with a cerebrovascular disorder, cerebral palsy, or both and the factor V Leiden mutation have been reported. The majority of these strokes were in the first year of life, many of them in the perinatal period. Two thirds had an additional exogenous risk factor for thrombosis, and 42% had another recognized endogenous prothrombotic risk factor in combination with the mutation. We review the association of the factor V Leiden mutation and a cerebrovascular disorder in children younger than 16 years of age and describe the clinical features of 8 children with cerebral palsy and the Leiden mutation. This mutation should be considered in the evaluation of children with a stroke or its sequelae, including infants with perinatal stroke.     

Recurrent pseudotumor cerebri in childhood: a case of neuro-Behçet disease complicated with thrombotic risk factors

Pseudotumor cerebri with or without venous sinus thrombosis is a rare clinical presentation of Beh?et disease in childhood. We present here a case of childhood pseudotumor cerebri without a previous diagnosis of Beh?et disease. The detailed history and physical examination of the case led to the diagnosis of neuro-Beh?et disease. The investigation of predisposition to thrombosis revealed heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation along with the high lipoprotein(a) level. The symptoms resolved dramatically by treatment with the combination of immunosuppression and anticoagulation with regard to the detected factor V Leiden mutation and high lipoprotein(a) level. After a symptom-free period of 9 months, the cerebral vein thrombosis recurred. We present this case to draw attention to this rare cause of pseudotumor cerebri in childhood and to emphasize the importance of additional thrombotic risk factors regarding the potential recurrence of thrombotic events in Beh?et disease.     

Thrombin generation in first-degree relatives of patients with venous thromboembolism who have factor V Leiden. A pilot study

The thrombin generation test appears to be a highly sensitive and specific test in the detection of thrombophilia in patients with venous thromboembolism. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the thrombin generation test to detect factor V Leiden and/or other prothrombotic states in first-degree relatives of patients with venous thromboembolism and factor V Leiden. Sixty-two first-degree relatives of 21 index cases were tested for factor V Leiden, the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation and thrombin generation. Information about oestrogen therapy and previous VTE was also collected. The normalized Thrombomodulin sensitivity ratio (n-TMsr) was defined as the ratio of endogenous thrombin potential determined in the presence and absence of thrombomodulin which was normalized against the same ratio determined in normal control plasma. The mean n-TMsr was 1.37 (+/- 0.33) in the 45 relatives with one or more prothrombotic state (factor V Leiden, G20210A prothrombin mutation, oestrogen therapy or hormonal therapy) and 1.02 (+/- 0.34) in the 17 relatives without prothrombotic state (p = 0.001). The positive predictive value was 90.3 (95%CI, 73.1-97.4). In relatives with an abnormal n-TMsr, the adjusted odds ratio for having a prothrombotic state was 8.3 (95%CI, 1.9-36.9) and the adjusted odds ratio for having the factor V Leiden was 14.3 (95%CI, 2.9-71.2). An abnormal thrombin generation test appears highly predictive for having factor V Leiden and/or other prothrombotic states in first-degree relatives of patients with venous thromboembolism and factor V Leiden.