腹腔镜全腹膜外与经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的临床对比研究

目的比较腹腔镜全腹膜外（TEP）与经腹腹膜前（TAPP）腹股沟疝修补术的可行性、安全性及有效性。方法回顾性分析2010年3月至2013年10月期间于笔者所在医院行腹腔镜TEP疝修补术（TEP组）和腹腔镜TAPP疝修补术（TAPP组）的95例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料和手术资料,比较TEP组和TAPP组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、手术费用、术后并发症发生情况等。结果所有患者的手术均获成功,无中转开放手术病例。TEP组与TAPP组患者的手术时间[（65±16）min比（68±17）mini、术中出血量[（7．0±1．2）mL比（8．0±1．4）mL3、术后疼痛分数[（2．0±1．1）分比（1．8±1．1）分]、术后住院时间（（3．1±1．4）d比（3．3±1．2）d]及恢复正常活动时间[（4．2±1．0）d比（4．5±1．2）d]比较差异均无统计学意义∽〉0．05）;TEP组和TAPP组的手术费用分别为（8033＋536）元和（9632＋643）元,TAPP组较高（P=O．007）。术后发生并发症6例（6．3％,6／95）,2组各3例,包括阴囊血（清）肿3例、暂时性感觉神经障碍1例,尿潴留2例,2组并发症发生率比较差异也无统计学意义（P=1．000）。所有患者均获访,随访时间为1～35个月、（20．0±10．2）个月,无复发及慢性疼痛发生。结论TEP与TAPP疝修补术均是可行、安全及有效的术式,各有其优缺点,两者在手术并发症方面无明显差别。     

经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝

目的：探讨经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术（ transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy ,TAPP）在治疗腹股沟复发疝中的效果。方法回顾性分析我院2010年6月～2013年12月TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝28例的临床资料。单侧疝25例,双侧疝3例（2例为术中发现）。斜疝13例,直疝15例。结果28例均获成功,无中转手术。手术时间（60＆#177;15） min,术中出血量（30＆#177;5）ml,术后住院时间（4＆#177;1）d。3例术后腹股沟区轻微疼痛不适,口服非甾体止疼药后缓解;4例血清肿,2例自行吸收,2例经多次穿刺抽液后治愈。随访时间1～24个月,平均17个月,其中20例＞12个月,均未见复发。结论 TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝避免了传统前入路的解剖复杂性,手术安全、有效。     

3D高清腹腔镜在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的应用

目的 探讨3D高清腹腔镜下行经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)治疗成人原发性单侧腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法 选择2021年1月至2022年2月在我院行TAPP术的腹股沟疝患者,按随机数字表法随机分为两组：3D组45例,年龄22～81岁,左侧13例,右侧32例;斜疝37例,直疝3例,股疝3例,单侧直、斜复合疝2例;腹股沟疝分型：Ⅰ型9例,Ⅱ型30例,Ⅲ型6例;均采用3D腹腔镜系统行TAPP术。2D组49例,年龄23～88岁,左侧17例,右侧32例;斜疝42例,直疝3例,股疝2例,单侧直、斜复合疝2例;腹股沟疝分型：Ⅰ型12例,Ⅱ型32例,Ⅲ型5例;均采用2D腹腔镜系统行TAPP术。结果 两组患者性别、年龄、疝分型及类型等基线资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。围手术期相关指标比较,3D组手术时间、补片放置时间、腹膜缝合时间均少于2D组(P<0.05),而两组术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院总费用比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3D组出现血清肿2例,切口感染1例,肺部感染2例,2D组出现血清肿2例,切口感染及肺部感染各1例,两组并发症发生率比较无统计...     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝

目的：评价腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法：回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月,我院收治手术的嵌顿性腹股沟疝44例临床资料。24例腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术为研究组,20例Lichtenstein术为对照组。比较两组手术时间、术后首次下床时间、术后住院时间、术后第1天疼痛评分、住院总费用等资料。术后随访12个月,比较两组术后血清肿、切口感染、补片感染、复发等术后情况。结果：与对照组比较,研究组手术时间较长[（80.96±13.25） min比（64.90±18.80） min,P<0.05],住院总费用较高[（16 389.07±2 034.72）元比（12 516.52±2 545.90）元,P<0.05]。研究组术后首次下床时间[（8.42±3.60） h比（11.00±3.52） h,P<0.05]及术后住院时间较短[（3.88±0.90） d比（4.80±1.32） d,P<0.05]。研究组术后第1天疼痛评分较对照组低[（2.25±0.74）分比（2.80±0.70）分,P<0.05]。研究组术后血清肿、切口感染,...     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝35例分析

目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)治疗复发性腹股沟疝的临床应用价值。方法:回顾分析2012年6月至2015年6月为35例复发性腹股沟疝患者行TAPP的临床资料。结果:35例手术均获成功,无一例中转开放手术。手术时间30~90 min,平均(45.2±5.3)min,术后住院1~7 d,平均(2.4±0.6)d;术后发生阴囊血清肿3例,无切口感染、异物反应、顽固性疼痛等其他并发症发生。术后随访3~39个月,无一例复发。结论:腹腔镜TAPP是治疗复发性腹股沟疝安全、有效的手段,具有创伤小、并发症少、效果可靠、复发率低等优点,可同时处理对侧疝,值得临床推广应用。     

腹横筋膜阻滞在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的应用价值

目的探讨腹横筋膜阻滞在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)的应用价值。方法随机将接受全麻下TAPP的82例腹股沟疝患者分为2组,每组41例。麻醉诱导完成后,在超声引导下观察组给予0.25%罗哌卡因行腹横筋膜阻滞,对照组给予0.9%氯化钠液行腹横筋膜浸润。比较2组患者不同时点的MAP、HR、VAS评分及不良反应。结果 2组患者切皮前的MAP及HR差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。切皮后,观察组患者的MAP、HR无明显变化,对照组MAP、HR明显较切皮前高,2组差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术后2 h、4 h、8 h、24 h的静息VAS评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。2组术后48 h的静息VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术后不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 TAPP术中应用腹横筋膜阻滞,可有效减轻患者术后疼痛,生命体征波动小,无不良反应,安全性高。     

腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前间隙疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝685例体会

腹股沟疝是常见病、多发病,随着医学技术的发展,腹股沟疝修补术不断改进,经腹腹膜前间隙疝修补术(TAPP)是当前临床上开展最广的、最成熟的腹腔镜微创手术.我们对685例腹股沟疝病人行TAPP治疗.现报道如下.     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的学习曲线

目的:探讨具有熟练腹腔镜基础操作技术的医师开展腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的学习曲线。方法:回顾分析2016年1月至2017年9月由同一术者完成的60例腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床资料,不包括双侧及复发性腹股沟疝。根据开展手术的顺序分为6组,每组10例,比较各组手术时间、中转开腹情况、术中出血量、术中术后并发症、术后住院时间等指标。结果:6组患者年龄、中转开腹率、术中出血量、术中术后并发症及术后住院时间差异无统计学意义,从第1组到第6组手术时间逐渐缩短:(120.7±21.4)min、(110.5±16.5)min、(101.2±10.3)min、(93.5±10.2)min、(79.9±9.3)min、(69.7±8.5)min。前4组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05),第5组手术时间短于前四组,与第4组相比差异有统计学意义(P0.01),与第6组相比差异无统计学意义(P=0.07)。结论:对于有熟练腹腔镜基本操作技术的医师而言,腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的学习曲线约为40例。     

经腹腔腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用效果

目的 探讨经腹腔腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析内黄县第二人民医院普外科2019-01—2020-10行疝修补术治疗的120例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。依据手术方法分为TAPP组和开放无张力疝修补术组(OTFH组),每组60例。比较2组患者的基线资料、术中情况,以及术后临床指标。统计术后随访12个月期间的并发症发生率和复发病例。结果 2组患者的基线资料和手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TAPP组的术中出血量少于OTFH组,术后第1天的VAS评分低于OTFH组,术后肛门恢复排气时间和住院时间短于OTFH组,住院费用高于OTFH组。以上差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后随访12个月期间,TAPP组并发症发生率低于OTFH组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),2组均未出现复发病例。结论 OTFH和TAPP治疗腹股沟疝均有良好的效果,其中TAPP具有创伤小,以及患者术后疼痛程度轻、恢复快、并发症发生率低等优势;而OTFH的治疗费用相对较低。临床可根据医院的条件、术者的经验、患者的意愿等因素权衡,依据个体化原则选择术式。     

腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前网片植入术治疗腹股沟疝

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前网片植入术(transabdominalpreperitonealpatchrepair,TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的手术特点及疗效。方法回顾性分析1998年3月~2005年11月82例TAPP的临床资料。结果82例TAPP均获成功,无一例中转开腹手术。手术时间(57.5±16.7)min(34~126min)。手术后阴囊血肿1例,无其他并发症。术后不用镇痛剂。下床活动时间(1.8±0.5)d(1~3d),术后住院(6.6±0.8)d(3~9d)。随访时间>1年者58例,无一例复发。结论腹腔镜TAPP采用后入路途径,遵循疝修补无张力原则,复发率低,是诊治腹股沟疝的有效手段。     

Resident training experience with robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

BackgroundGeneral surgery is the fastest growing field in the adoption of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. Here, we present the results of one institution’s experience in training surgical residents in robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs.MethodsData were prospectively collected on patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with residents. Data points included patient age, gender, complications, hernia difficulty, resident technical competency as measured by GEARS, Zwisch scores, operative time, and the number of robotic console cases reported by residents as primary surgeon.ResultsResidents who performed >30 robotic cases had significantly higher mean modified GEARS scores (p ≤ .002). Residents who completed 10 or fewer robotic cases achieved significantly lower mean modified GEARS and Zwisch scores than those who completed 11 or more (p < .001).ConclusionsResident competency and autonomy improve with increasing total robotic case load. Attending surgeons grant more autonomy to residents with higher competency scores.     

成人腹股沟复发疝行腹腔镜经腹膜前间隙修补术疗效分析

目的探讨并分析腹腔镜经腹膜前间隙疝修补术（TAPP）治疗成人腹股沟复发疝的临床效果及手术技巧。 方法回顾性分析2016年5月至2019年4月于徐州市中心医院血甲疝微创外科行TAPP手术的52例复发性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。统计并分析患者手术时间、住院时间及术后并发症发生情况等数据。 结果所有患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开放。手术用时35～110 min,平均（61.7±13.8）min;术中出血量5～40 ml,平均（13.1±4.7）ml;术后住院时间为1～7 d,平均（2.5±0.9）d;术中误伤腹壁下血管者1例（1.9%）,经缝扎止血后好转。术后出现阴囊血清肿者5例（9.6%）,3例经保守治疗后治愈,2例经穿刺抽吸后治愈。阴囊及腹股沟区气肿者2例,自行吸收好转。尿潴留者3例（5.8%）,经留置导尿管2 d过渡后恢复自行排尿。术区异物感者2例（3.8%）,经口服神经营养及止痛药后好转。术后随访6～41个月,无再次复发、补片感染、持续性疼痛、肠梗阻等严重并发症发生。 结论TAPP治疗成人腹股沟复发疝具有疗效确切、安全性高、术后恢复好、复发率低的优势,但要求术者必须在熟练掌握腹腔镜技巧、腹股沟区解剖及复发疝的治疗要点的前提下,才能充分发挥TAPP的优势,取得临床最佳疗效。     

Clinical value of the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique in recurrent inguinal hernia repair

ObjectiveTo assess the clinical value of the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique in recurrent inguinal hernia repair.MethodsThe clinical data of 354 patients with recurrent inguinal hernia who underwent TAPP surgery from June 2010 to June 2016 at the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsLaparoscopic surgery was successfully completed in all 360 patients. Among them TAPP were finished in 354 patients, while TAPP repair were attempted but finally converted to open or TAPE repair in 6 patients. The mean operation time was 54.7 ± 19.4 min (range 30–90 min), mean duration of hospitalization was 4.7 ± 2.1 days (range 2–14 days), and mean duration of follow-up was 37.7 ± 12.4 months (range 12–60 months). The rate of intraoperative injury was 4.5% (16/354), and the rate of postoperative complications was 13.6% (48/354). No patient developed a foreign body sensation, wound infection, intestinal obstruction, mesh infection, or chronic pain. Two patients (0.6%) developed re-recurrence requiring reoperation, with no further recurrence.ConclusionWhen performed by an experienced surgeon with excellent technique, the TAPP technique is safe and effective for recurrent hernia after surgical treatment via the anterior repair, and maybe a good alternative for recurrent hernia after surgical treatment via the posterior repair.     

腹腔镜腹膜前补片修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝24例经验

目的分析总结腹股沟疝术后复发的原因,探讨腹腔镜腹膜前补片修补术(transabdominal approach with stapled preperitoned mesh repair,TAPP)治疗复发性腹股沟疝的临床应用价值.方法回顾性分析我院1998年6月～2003年10月收治24例腹股沟复发疝进行TAPP的临床资料,其中直疝11例,斜疝13例.结果24例手术全部成功,无中转开放手术.手术时间47～128 min,平均69 min,术后住院2～5 d,平均3 d.术后6例出现尿潴留,留置尿管1～3 d后拔除,无切口感染、阴囊血肿、积气等并发症.24例随访2个月～5年6个月,平均2年3个月,无一例复发.结论腹腔镜行复发性腹股沟疝TAPP修补术创伤小,并发症少,是治疗复发性腹股沟疝安全、可靠的手术方法.     

腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿影响的前瞻性研究

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)术中残端疝囊处理方式对术后血清肿的影响。方法采用前瞻性研究方法。选取2017年10月至2019年3月福建医科大学附属协和医院收治的128例男性原发性腹股沟斜疝患者的临床资料。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组,患者行TAPP,术中疝囊剥离及横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘,设为试验组;患者行TAPP,术中疝囊剥离及横断后将残端游离于腹腔,设为对照组。观察指标:(1)手术情况。(2)随访情况。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解患者术后血清肿、切口感染、慢性疼痛、疝复发情况。随访时间截至2019年6月。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用t检验。偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。结果筛选出符合条件的男性患者128例;平均年龄为61岁,年龄范围为47~74岁。128例患者中,试验组60例,对照组68例。(1)手术情况:试验组和对照组患者手术时间分别为(102±34)min和(97±30)min,住院费用分别为(12813±2390)元和(12125±2205)元,两组患者上述指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.907,1.685,P>0.05)。(2)随访情况:128例患者均获得随访。试验组和对照组术后发生血清肿分别为8例和8例,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.072,P>0.05)。试验组术后发生血清肿患者抽液量为20 mL(4~31 mL),对照组术后发生血清肿患者抽液量为43 mL(23~98 mL),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.013,P<0.05)。试验组和对照组发生血清肿患者术后3个月均无切口感染、慢性疼痛、疝复发。结论TAPP术中疝囊横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘和将残端游离于腹腔均能有效修补腹股沟斜疝。疝囊横断后将残端缝合固定于腹直肌下缘可减少术后血清肿抽液量。     

加速康复外科模式在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的应用

目的探讨加速康复外科（ERAS）模式在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术（TAPP）围手术期中的应用。 方法选取2017年11月至2018年11月中山大学附属第六医院收治并行腹腔镜经腹腹膜TAPP术的240例患者为研究对象,按照随机分配原则分为ERAS模式组120例和传统模式组120例,记录并比较两组患者术后恶心呕吐发生率、切口疼痛发生率、尿潴留发生率、血清肿发生率、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、正常进食时间、住院天数、住院总费用、患者满意度以及远期随访指标包括疝复发、慢性疼痛、补片感染等。 结果ERAS模式组患者术后恶心呕吐、切口疼痛、尿潴留的发生率分别为5.00%、3.33%、4.17%,低于传统模式组的15.00%、10.83%、11.67%,两者差异有统计学意义（χ²=6.667、5.128、4.630,P=0.010、0.024、0.031）;两组患者血清肿、疝复发、腹股沟区慢性疼痛、补片感染发生率比较,差异无统计学意义（χ²=0.095、0.338、0.204、0.338,P=0.758、0.561、0.651、0.561）。ERAS模式组患者肛门排气时间（6.45±2.12）h、下床活动时间（8.12±2.62）h、正常饮食时间（8.38±2.64）h、住院天数（2.44±0.89）d、住院费用（1.58±0.26）万元均低于传统模式组的（7.28±2.34）h、（12.17±4.35）h、（10.12±2.23）h、（3.78±1.19）d、（1.67±0.25）万元,差异有统计学意义（t=2.880、8.737、5.516、9.878、2.733,均P<0.01）。ERAS组患者满意度（71.67%）高于传统模式组（47.50%）,差异有统计学意义（z=4.427, P=0.002）。 结论ERAS应用于腹腔镜TAPP术中,患者恢复快、并发症少、住院费用低、满意度高,值得临床推广应用。     

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair versus anterior preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is still not the gold standard for repair although mesh implantation is unequivocally accepted as an integral part of any groin hernia repair. The aim of the study was to compare the results of anterior preperitoneal (APP) mesh repair with totally extra peritoneal (TEP) repair for inguinal hernias. The prospective study was conducted on 241 patients with 247 hernias (from January 2000 to June 2004). Anterior preperitoneal repair was done in 121 patients and 120 patients were subjected to TEP repair. Repair in both groups was done by using Prolene mesh of size 6×4 in. or 6×6 in. intraoperative and postoperative parameters and complications were recorded and the patients were followed up to 1 year post-surgery. For both unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernias, mean operative time was significantly more in patients of TEP repair as compared to APP repair (P<0.001) and significantly more patients had peritoneal tears in the TEP group (P<0.001). Patients undergoing TEP repair, however, had significantly less postoperative pain (P<0.05) and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05) and return to work was significantly earlier is this group (P<0.01 and P<0.001). There was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups. Patients with inguinal hernias undergoing laparoscopic repair recover more rapidly, and have less incidence of postoperative pain. But it takes significantly more time to perform than APP repair and also the incidence of peritoneal tear is higher.     

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017patients

BACKGROUND: This report reviews our experience with 3530 transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repairs in 3017 patients (513 bilateral) over the 7-year period from May 1992 to July 1999. We have continually audited our practice and modified the techniques in response. METHODS: Unless contraindicated, laparoscopic TAPP repair is considered the procedure of choice at our institution for all reducible inguinal hernias. We initially stapled an 11 x 6 cm polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space but now place a 15 x 10 cm mesh in the preperitoneal space with sutured peritoneal closure. RESULTS: There have been a total of 22 recurrences, of which 17 were identified in the first 325 repairs (5%) using the 11 x 6 cm mesh. Five recurrences occurred in the later 3205 repairs (0.16%) (median follow up of 45 months). There was one 30-day death unrelated to the procedure. There have been seven conversions (four due to irreducibility, two due to extensive adhesions, one due to bleeding). Bladder perforations have occurred in seven cases, of which six were recognized immediately and treated laparoscopically without sequelae. There have been seven cases of small bowel obstruction from herniation through the peritoneal closure. Sutured repair of the peritoneum has reduced the incidence of this complication. Four patients had mesh infections, of whom three were treated conservatively. The incidence of postoperative seroma and hematoma was 8%. Median operation time remains at 40 min with a mean hospitalization of 0.9 nights. Sixty percent of TAPP hernia repairs are now performed on the Day Surgical Unit with a 3% admission rate. Median return to normal activities is 7 days. Forty percent of patients require no postoperative analgesia. These figures remain the same whether the hernia is primary, recurrent, unilateral, or bilateral. Consultants performed most operations early in the series, but latterly surgical trainees have performed the majority of these procedures under supervision. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair is technically difficult, but in the hands of a well-trained surgeon, it is safe and effective with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The low recurrence rate compares favorably to other tension-free mesh hernia repairs.     

免钉合经腹腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(附104例报告)

【摘要】〓目的〓探讨腹腔镜下免钉合经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)的手术效果。方法分析2009年10月~2014年2月行TAPP手术104例。建立气腹后,于疝环边缘上方切开腹膜,于腹膜前置入聚丙烯补片,不予钉合固定。结果〓104例手术均获成功,无中转开腹,无手术及术后出血。随访1~20个月,无复发及慢性疼痛发生。结论〓免钉合TAPP手术操作方便,但需要较娴熟的腹腔镜操作技术及镜下缝合技术,腹膜前间隙的合适的解剖以及补片适当的置入是手术关键,免钉合既降低了手术的费用,也避免了手术后的疼痛的发生。