Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil after liver transplantation

Since the approval of sirolimus (SRL) as an immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation, several liver transplant centres have introduced this agent to the immunosuppression regimen. We present here a retrospective follow-up study of late conversion to sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as immunosuppressive agents after liver transplantation (LTX). From July 2001 to March 2002, seven liver transplant recipients (three female, 59 (41-66) years old) were enrolled in this study. Indications for liver transplantation were hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C (three), alcohol-induced cirrhosis (three) and Wilson's syndrome (hepatolenticular degeneration) (one). LTX was performed by standard (four) or piggy-back (three) technique. The switch to SRL was performed 62 (37-118) months after LTX; the reasons for the switch from cyclosporine or tacrolimus to SRL were renal (six) or neurological (one) impairment. As immunosuppressive therapy, SRL at trough levels of 4-10 ng/ml and MMF at trough levels of approximately 1 micro g/ml were administered. Mean follow-up time under SRL per patient was 137 (26-258 days). Patient and graft survival was 100% during SRL therapy, and there were neither rejection episodes nor infections. Renal function improved in five of the six patients (83.3%) whom we had switched to SRL due to renal impairment. In the patient whom we switched to SRL due to neurological impairment, the neurological symptoms abated, and renal function improved. Side effects (hypertriglyceridaemia, hypercholesterolaemia, exanthema) became manifest in three patients (42.8%). Cessation of therapy due to side effects was necessary in two patients (exanthema: one, hypertriglyceridaemia: one). One patient refused to continue the therapy with SRL because he wanted tablets, and we only had SRL in fluid form. The data of our study suggest that SRL is a potent immunosuppressive agent of potential benefit in clinical LTX. SRL in combination with MMF provided sufficient immunosuppression of liver allografts in the late course after LTX. Side effects were reversible with dose reduction or cessation of therapy. We can thus conclude that SRL might offer an immunosuppressive therapy for patients with renal or neurological impairment after LTX.     

Increased Risk of Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Patients Receiving a Cyclosporin–Sirolimus Combination

A single-center cohort study of kidney and kidney-pancreas recipients was conducted to evaluate the association between new immunosuppressive regimens and risk of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). From January 1st,1996 to December 31, 2002, 368 patients received a kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant at our center. Four immunosuppressive regimens were evaluated as potential risk factors of TMA: cyclosporin + mycophenolate mofetil (CsA + MMF), cyclosporin + sirolimus (CsA + SRL), tacrolimus + myophenolate mofetil (FK + MMF), and tacrolimus + sirolimus (FK + SRL). Thirteen patients developed biopsy-proven TMA in the absence of vascular rejection. The incidence of TMA was significantly different in the four immunosuppressive regimens studied (p < 0.001). The incidence of TMA was highest in the CsA + SRL group (20.7%). The relative risk of TMA was 16.1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.3-60.8] for patients in the CsA + SRL group as compared with those in the FK + MMF group. We also investigated in vitro the pathophysiological basis of this association. The CsA-SRL combination was found to be the only regimen that concomitantly displayed pro-necrotic and anti-angiogenic activities on arterial endothelial cells. We propose that this combination concurs to development of TMA through dual activities on endothelial cell death and repair.     

Long-term renal allograft function on a tacrolimus-based, pred-free maintenance immunosuppression comparing sirolimus vs. MMF.

It is not known how different steroid-free immunosuppressive combinations affect renal graft survival and long-term kidney transplant function. Here we sought to compare the impact on graft survival and long-term graft function of two tacrolimus (Tac)-based, prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocols: Tac/Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) vs. Tac/Sirolimus (SRL). Renal transplant patients given induction therapy with IL2-RA and methylprednisolone on days 0, 1 and 2 post-transplant were prospectively randomized to two maintenance immunosuppressive regimens with Tac/MMF (n = 45) or Tac/SRL (n = 37). During the 3-year follow-up the following data were collected: patient survival, renal allograft survival, incidence of acute rejection and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at different time-points post-transplant. Cumulative graft survival was significantly different in the two groups: one kidney loss in the Tac/MMF vs. six kidney losses in the Tac/SRL (log-rank test p = 0.04). GFR at different time-points post-transplant was consistently and statistically better in the Tac/MMF than in the Tac/SRL group. The slope of GFR decline per month was flatter in the Tac/MMF than in the Tac/SRL group. This study showed that renal graft survival and graft function were significantly lower in the combination of Tac/SRL than Tac/MMF.     

Tacrolimus with Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) or Sirolimus vs. Cyclosporine with MMF in Cardiac Transplant Patients: 1-Year Report

The most advantageous combination of immunosuppressive agents for cardiac transplant recipients has not yet been established. Between November 2001 and June 2003, 343 de novo cardiac transplant recipients were randomized to receive steroids and either tacrolimus (TAC) + sirolimus (SRL), TAC + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclosporine (CYA) + MMF. Antilymphocyte induction therapy was allowed for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint of >/=3A rejection or hemodynamic compromise rejection requiring treatment showed no significant difference at 6 months (TAC/MMF 22.4%, TAC/SRL 24.3%, CYA/MMF 31.6%, p = 0.271) and 1 year (p = 0.056), but it was significantly lower in the TAC/MMF group when compared only to the CYA/MMF group at 1 year (23.4% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.029). Differences in the incidence of any treated rejection were significant (TAC/SRL = 35%, TAC/MMF = 42%, CYA/MMF = 59%; p < 0.001), as were median levels of serum creatinine (TAC/SRL = 1.5 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 1.3 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 1.5 mg/dL; p = 0.032) and triglycerides (TAC/SRL = 162 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 126 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 154 mg/dL; p = 0.028). The TAC/SRL group encountered fewer viral infections but more fungal infections and impaired wound healing. These secondary endpoints suggest that the TAC/MMF combination appears to offer more advantages than TAC/SRL or CYA/MMF in cardiac transplant patients, including fewer >/=3A rejections or hemodynamic compromise rejections and an improved side-effect profile.     

Comparison of Sirolimus Combined With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined With Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

The study was designed to compare the outcomes of sirolimus (SRL) combined with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with TAC in kidney transplantation recipients.

Comparison of sirolimus and everolimus in their effects on blood lipid profiles and haematological parameters in heart transplant recipients

The mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors sirolimus (SRL) and everolimus (EVL) are potent immunosuppressive agents, which allow reducing the dose of the nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin and tacrolimus (TAC) in solid organ transplant recipients. However, there is evidence that mTOR inhibitors may lead to myelosuppression and dyslipidemia/hyperlipidemia. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis in heart transplant recipients with renal insufficiency, who received 3.0 mg/d SRL (SRL group; n = 28) or 1.5 mg/d EVL (EVL group; n = 27) each in combination with a reduced TAC dose for at least one yr. Fewer cardiac rejections, but a similar rate of infections occurred in the EVL group compared with the SRL group indicating that the administered EVL dose resulted in a potent immunosuppression. Serum triglyceride and total cholesterol concentrations rose significantly in the SRL group but not in the EVL group. In the SRL group only, the frequency of statin use increased significantly during follow-up. The EVL group showed a significant rise in HDL cholesterol levels during follow-up. There was a slight transient fall in haemoglobin concentrations in the SRL group but not in the EVL group. Leucocyte counts fell significantly in both study groups. However, no cases of leucopenia and also no cases of thrombopenia occurred. In summary, we could demonstrate that in heart transplant recipients with renal insufficiency the introduction of 1.5 mg/d EVL in combination with a reduced TAC dose is effective in preventing cardiac rejections and has less adverse effects on lipid metabolism than the usually prescribed SRL dose, whereas both therapy regimens are not associated with major haematological side-effects.     

Are lipid‐dependent indicators of cardiovascular risk affected by renal transplantation?

Hyperlipoproteinemia has been reported to frequently occur in kidney transplanted patients, thus possibly explaining, at least in part, the increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in this population. To evaluate the impact of renal transplantation (Tx), and related immunosuppressive therapy, on plasma lipoprotein and Lp(a) profile, we selected a cohort of kidney transplanted patients (36 M/14 F; age 33.8 + 12.0 yr, range 13-62) lacking significant causes of hyperlipidemia. All patients received a triple immunosuppressive regimen and showed a stable renal function after Tx (plasma creatinine: 1.36 +/- 0.35 mg/dL). One year after Tx, we found a significant increase of total cholesterol (TC), LDL, HDL, ApoB and ApoA-I (p < 0.005), while plasma triglyceride levels remained unmodified. Lp(a) plasma levels after Tx were within the normal range and displayed a significant inverse relationship with apo(a) size. Noteworthy, LDL/HDL ratio and ApoB/ ApoA-I ratio in kidney transplanted patients were almost superimposable with those of normal controls. Specifically, LDL/HDL ratio significantly decreased in 64% of patients after Tx, due to a prevalent increase of HDL, and was associated with a moderate amelioration of plasma TG. In a multiple linear regression model, post-Tx HDL level was significantly related to recipient's age, gender, BMI and cyclosporine (CyA) trough levels (Adj-R2 = 0.35, p = 0.0002), with gender and CyA trough levels being the better predictors of HDL. In conclusion, immunosuppressive regimens, in themselves, do not appear to significantly increase the atherogenic risk related to lipoproteins. Rather, other factors can affect the lipoprotein profile and its vascular effects in renal transplant recipients.     

Tacrolimus-based triple-drug immunosuppression minimizes serum lipid elevations in pediatric cardiac transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression with corticosteroids and cyclosporine has been associated with hyperlipidemia, a risk factor for post-transplant coronary artery disease. The recent development of tacrolimus has created an alternative to cyclosporine-based triple drug immunotherapy. One potential benefit that has been reported in patients receiving tacrolimus is a minimization of elevation of both total and LDL cholesterol, compared to those increases observed in patients receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. It is unclear in previous studies whether this beneficial effect is related to tacrolimus directly or to its corticosteroid sparing potential. To study this relationship, we compared lipid profiles from pediatric cardiac transplant recipients treated with corticosteroids, and either cyclosporine or tacrolimus. METHODS: The study group consisted of 23 patients (mean age = 12.3 years) with pre-transplant and serial post-transplant determinations of total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides. Patients were separated into 4 study groups, defined by immunosuppressive regimen (cyclosporine vs. tacrolimus) and prednisone dose (>0.10 mg/kg/day vs. < or =0.10 mg/kg/day). RESULTS: Patients who received cyclosporine and higher doses of prednisone experienced a mean 74 mg/dl increase from baseline in total cholesterol (p = .0001). None of the other 3 treatment groups demonstrated a statistically significant elevation. Similar trends were observed in LDL and triglyceride alterations between the 4 study groups. Interestingly, patients treated with tacrolimus and higher doses of prednisone demonstrated a significant rise in HDL from baseline (p = .0001), although those who received cyclosporine and higher dose prednisone failed to exhibit this rise. CONCLUSION: The minimal degree of lipid alteration seen in patients receiving tacrolimus and higher doses of prednisone indicates that this effect was not solely based upon the steroid-sparing properties of tacrolimus therapy. The data also suggests a possible synergistic effect between cyclosporine and higher doses of prednisone on hyperlipidemia. Therefore, in pediatric patients requiring higher corticosteroid doses late after transplantation, use of tacrolimus rather than cyclosporine may lead to more favorable lipid profiles and help minimize the risk of post-transplant coronary arteriopathy.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Our clinical trial was designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants for renal transplantation. METHODS: A randomized three-arm, parallel group, open label, prospective study was performed at 15 North American centers to compare three immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus + azathioprine (AZA) versus cyclosporine (Neoral) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus tacrolimus + MMF. All patients were first cadaveric kidney transplants receiving the same maintenance corticosteroid regimen. Only patients with delayed graft function (32%) received antilymphocyte induction. A total of 223 patients were randomized, transplanted, and followed for 1 year. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline demography between the three treatment groups. At 1 year the results are as follows: acute rejection 17% (95% confidence interval 9%, 26%) in tacrolimus + AZA; 20% (confidence interval 11%, 29%) in cyclosporine + MMF; and 15% (confidence interval 7%, 24%) in tacrolimus + MMF. The incidence of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy was 12% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 11% in the cyclosporine + MMF group, and 4% in the tacrolimus + MMF group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival. Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower incidence of hyperlipidemia through 6 months posttransplant. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus requiring insulin was 14% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 7% in the cyclosporine + MMF and 7% in the tacrolimus + MMF groups. CONCLUSIONS: All regimens yielded similar acute rejection rates and graft survival, but the tacrolimus + MMF regimen was associated with the lowest rate of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy.     

Sirolimus in Combination with Tacrolimus Is Associated with Worse Renal Allograft Survival Compared to Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined with Tacrolimus

Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is enhanced by sirolimus (SRL). Tacrolimus is perceived to be less nephrotoxic than CsA, and therefore, CsA has been largely replaced by tacrolimus (TAC) when calcineurin inhibitors are used with SRL. We analyzed 44 915 adult renal transplants in the Scientific Renal Transplant Registry (SRTR) from 2000 to 2004. Three thousand five hundred twenty-four (7.8%) patients received a baseline immunosuppressive regimen of TAC/SRL, with an inferior overall (log-rank p<0.001) and death-censored graft survival (p<0.001) as compared to TAC/MMF (N=27 007). This effect was confirmed in multivariate Cox models; the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for overall graft loss with TAC/SRL was 1.47 (95% CI=1.32, 1.63) and for CsA/SRL 1.38 (95% CI=1.20, 1.59) relative to TAC/MMF. These effects were most apparent in high-risk transplants. Six-month acute rejection rates were low (11.5-12.6%) and not different between groups. In summary, national data indicate that TAC/SRL as compared to TAC/MMF is associated with significantly worse renal allograft survival in all subgroups of patients and, in particular, higher-risk transplants. These results have to be interpreted in the context of the inherent limitations of any retrospective database analysis and evaluated in context with data from prospective clinical trials.     

Immunosuppressive Agents and Metabolic Factors of Cardiovascular Risk in Renal Transplant Recipients

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for 35% to 50% of deaths among renal transplant recipients. Beside the atherogenic risk factors related to hemodialysis, renal function, and use of immunosuppressive agents, other relevant risk factors for CVD include acute rejection episodes, microalbuminuria (μAlb), diabetes, arterial hypertension, lipid disorders, inflammatory triggers, hyperhomocysteinemia, anemia, erythrocytosis, obesity, and hyperuricemia. We studied the prevalence of risk factors and the impact of various drugs on CVD among 103 renal transplant recipients with measured glomerular filtration rates showing values >45 mL/min. We measured uric acid, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) LDL/HDL ratio, homocysteine (HOMO), insulin resistance, μAlb, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen. Subsequently, patients were divided into 8 groups based on the immunosuppressive protocol to evaluate its impact on CVD risk factors. Insulin resistance and hyperhomocysteinemia were present in >2/3 of patients. Considering the impact of protocols, the combination of cyclosporine (CsA) + everolimus (EVL) resulted in the most favorable profile in terms of reduction of hyperuricemia, hyperlipidemia, and hyperhomocysteinemia. Insulin resistance tended to be more frequent among patients treated with protocols including calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and steroids. The prevalence of hyperhomocyteinemia was similar among patients on CsA and on tacrolimus (Tac). Sirolimus (SRL) was associated with higher levels of HOMO. The combination of CNI and proliferative signal inhibitors (PSI) seemed to be the most promising one to reduce the impact of CVD risk factors. The reduction in CVD morbidity can improve expectancy and quality of life, as well as graft function and survival among renal transplant patients.     

Lipid profile during azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil combinations with cyclosporine and steroids

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive therapy is the major cause of hyperlipidemia after renal transplantation. We sought to compare the effects of an azathioprine (AZA) combination (n = 26) with corticosteroid and cyclosporine (CyA; group 1) with a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination (n = 71; group 2) in the first year following renal transplantation. METHODS: Ninety-seven renal transplant patients (71 men, 26 women; aged 34.7 +/- 13.1 years; renal transplantation duration, 44.9 +/- 12.9 months) underwent serum lipid profiles--total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein (HDL); low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) at the initiation of as well as 3-month intervals after grafting for 1 year retrospectively. Serum creatinine for each patient was recorded at 12 months. We evaluated possible risk factors for hyperlipidemia. RESULTS: For all patients, the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (>200 mg/dL) was 36.1% during the pretransplant period, 60.8% at month 3, 50.5% at month 6, and 38.1% at month 12 after renal transplantation. Total cholesterol and triglyceride levels significantly increased in both groups in the first year (P = .001 and P = .02, respectively). Three-month values for total cholesterol were higher in group 2 than group 1 (P = .001). No significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to total cholesterol and triglyceride levels (P > .05). In both groups, HDL, LDL, and VLDL levels did not change during the 12-month study (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Independent of hyperlipidemia risk factors, serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels tended to increase during CyA and steroid therapy among patients undergoing renal transplantation. Combination with MMF or AZA showed no advantage over one another regarding their effects on the lipid profile.     

Cardiovascular risk factors in renal transplant patients after switch from standard tacrolimus to prolonged-release tacrolimus

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are the leading cause of death after renal transplantation. Renal transplant patients present CV risk factors that correlate with renal function and the use of immunosuppressive drugs. Noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy after organ transplantation increases the incidence of rejection, graft loss, and patient death. A simple posology regimen is the best way to promote compliance with prescribed therapy. To meet this need, a new formulation of tacrolimus that is suitable for once-daily administration, is now available on the market: prolonged-release tacrolimus (Fkpr). We analyzed changes in CV risk factors observed in renal transplant patients after transition from standard tacrolimus (Fk) to Fkpr and the rate of patients with the investigated parameters within the normal ranges before and after conversion. The study enrolled 40 Caucasian renal transplant patients (26 men and 14 women) who were being followed at our posttransplantation day hospital clinics. After a varying time interval after transplantation, patients on treatment with tacrolimus, mycophenolate + mofetil (MMF), and steroid entered a 12-month observation period. Thereafter, they were switched to Fkpr, also in association with MMF and steroid, and were observed for a further 12-month period. The following parameters were tested in all patients: creatinine, creatinine clearance, insulin resistance, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, homocysteine, and urine magnesium. The switch from Fk to Fkpr showed an improvement of the parameters investigated. Moreover, the proportion of patients with normal laboratory values after the transition from Fk to Fkpr was noted either to increase or to remain stable at the improved levels observed during therapy with Fk. Immunosuppressive treatment with Fkpr represents an even better option than Fk for renal transplant patients, because by reducing CV risk factors it favorably affects the long-term outcomes for graft and patient.     

Costimulatory blockade with mTor inhibition abrogates effector T‐cell responses allowing regulatory T‐cell survival in renal transplantation

The advent of novel immunosuppressive strategies in renal transplantation, with immunomodulatory properties, might facilitate long‐term allograft survival. T‐cell depletion, costimulation‐blockade and mTor inhibition have been shown to favour anti‐donor hyporesponsiveness. Recently, the combination of rATG, belatacept (Bela) and sirolimus (SRL) has been used in kidney transplantation, showing very low incidence of acute rejection and excellent 12‐month graft and patient survival. Herein, we have analysed the 1‐year evolution of memory/effector and regulatory T cells and assessed the donor‐specific T‐cell alloimmune response in a group of these patients and compared with others treated with a calcineurin‐inhibitor(CNI)‐based (rATG/tacrolimus/MMF), and two other Bela‐based regimens (rATG/Bela/MMF and basiliximab/Bela/MMF/steroids). During the first year after transplantation, patients receiving rATG/Bela/SRL had significantly higher percentage of Tregs upon the memory T‐cell compartment and showed a potent anti‐donor suppressive activity. In an in vitro naive and memory/effector T‐cell co‐culture, the combination of costimulation‐blockade and SRL could abrogate both antigen‐specific T‐cell responses as efficiently as using a CNI drug. The combination of T‐cell depletion, costimulation‐blockade and mTor inhibition seems to be able to allow Treg survival and inhibit donor‐specific alloreactive effector immune responses after kidney transplantation in humans.     

Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus

Maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation has been associated with proteinuria. We report long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients maintained on steroid-free regimens, either SRL with low-dose tacrolimus (SRL/L-Tac) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with high-dose tacrolimus (MMF/H-Tac). We conducted a case-matched study of 50 patients receiving MMF/H-Tac, matched 1:2 with 100 patients maintained on SRL/L-Tac. All patients were induced with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by early steroid withdrawal. Comparisons were made of patient and graft survival, graft function, acute rejection, and albuminuria. There were no significant differences between the SRL/L-Tac and MMF/H-Tac groups for patient survival, graft survival, occurrence of acute rejection, or graft function. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥300 μg/mg (19% vs. 20%), but more patients in the SRL group were receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking agents (72% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Only flushing the donor kidney with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (vs. UW solution) was predictive of albuminuria. Long-term outcomes are similar at our center for kidney transplant patients receiving either SRL/L-Tac or MMF/H-Tac. Although the occurrence of albuminuria was not different, significantly more SRL-treated patients were receiving antiproteinuric medications.     

Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression with sirolimus in renal transplantation: a randomized, controlled Spare-the-Nephron trial

As part of the Spare-the-Nephron trial, we evaluated the combination mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen for the preservation of renal function in renal allograft recipients. This 2-year, open-label, multicenter trial randomized 299 patients of which 151 were maintained on MMF and a CNI, 148 on MMF plus SRL (n=120, tacrolimus; n=31, cyclosporine). Baseline characteristics including measured (iothalamate) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups. After 1 year, the mean percentage change from baseline in the primary end point of measured GFR was significantly higher in the MMF/SRL group compared with the MMF/CNI group. After 2 years, the change was indistinguishable. Calculated creatinine clearance and GFR were significantly greater with MMF/SRL at 2 years within which biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 14 MMF/SRL-treated patients (3 graft losses) and in 17 receiving the MMF/CNI (6 graft losses). Significantly, no patients receiving MMF/SRL but five treated with MMF/CNI died. Thus, compared with MMF/CNI treatment, a 2-year regimen of MMF/SRL resulted in similar measures of renal function but with fewer deaths and a trend to less BPAR and graft loss.     

肾移植后不同免疫抑制方案的效果及不良反应的临床分析

目的 总结肾移植后使用不同免疫抑制方案的效果和不良反应,以提高人/肾的长期存活率.方法 对单中心3102例肾移植受者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,所采用的免疫抑制方案有环孢素A(CsA)+硫唑嘌呤(Aza)+泼尼松(Pred)、低剂量CsA+吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)+Pred、低剂量他克莫司(Tac)+MMF+Pred、低剂量CsA(或Tac)+西罗莫司(SRL)+Pred等方案,分析各方案的效果和不良反应.结果 低剂量CsA+MMF+Pred方案的人/肾1、5、10年存活率均高于CsA+Aza+Pred方案,而高血压、震颤、高尿酸、肝肾毒性、白细胞下降等的发生率显著低于CsA+Aza+Pred方案(P＜0.05),腹泻发生率显著高于CsA+Aza+Pred方案(P＜0.05).低剂量Tac+MMF+Pred方案的高血糖发生率显著高于低剂量CsA+MMF+Pred方案(P＜0.05),多毛症发生率显著低于低剂量CsA+MMF+Pred方案(P＜0.05);低剂量CsA(或Tac)+SRL+Pred方案的腹泻、高尿酸血症、肝肾毒性和多毛症等的发生率显著低于低剂量CsA(或Tac)+MMF+Pred方案(P＜0.05),但高血脂发生率显著高于后者(P＜0.05).以低剂量Tac为基础的方案者高血糖发生率显著应用低剂量CsA者.结论 低剂量CsA(或Tac)+MMF+Pred方案改善了肾移植受者和移植肾的存活,降低了不良反应发生率,尤以低剂量Tac+MMF+Pred方案为优;调整免疫抑制方案或剂量,改善饮食习惯,加强锻炼,优化降血压、降血脂、控制血糖的治疗措施对预防和控制不良反应尤为重要.

Abstract：

Objective To summarize the incidence and treatment experience of the effectiveness and adverse reactions of the different immunosuppressive protocols and to increase the long-term survival rate in kidney recipients. Methods Single-center retrospective analysis was performed on 3102 cases of kidney transplant recipients in effectiveness and adverse reactions of different immunosuppressive protocols. The immunosuppressive protocols were as follows: CsA + Aza + Pred,low dose CsA + MMF + Pred, low dose Tac + MMF + Pred, low dose CsA + SRL + Pred, and low dose Tac+ SRL+ Pred. Results The 1-, 5-, 10-year survival rate of patients/kidney in low dose CsA + MMF + Pred protocol was higher than that in CsA + Aza + Pred protocol. The incidence of adverse reactions, such as hypertension, hyperuricemia, kidney and liver toxicity, and leukopenia was significantly lower, but the incidence of diarrhea was significantly higher in CsA + MMF + Pred protocol than in CsA + Aza + Pred protocol (all P＜0. 01). The incidence of hyperglycemia was significantly higher (P＜0. 05), and that of hairy and gingival hyperplsia was significantly lower (P＜0. 05) in low dose Tac+ MMF+ Pred than in low dose CsA+ MMF+ Pred protocol. The incidence of hyperlipidemia in low dose CsA (or Tac)+ SRL + Pred was significantly higher than in CsA (or Tac)+ MMF+ Pred protocol (P＜0. 05). The incidence of hirsutism in low dose Tac + SRL + Pred was significantly lower than that in CsA + SRL + Pred protocol (P ＜ 0. 05). The incidence of hyperglycemia in low dose Tac + SRL + Pred was significantly higher than that in low dose CsA + SRL + Pred protocol. Conclusion The triple drug protocol with a low dose of CsA (or Tac)+ MMF+ Pred significantly improved the survival of renal transplant recipients and graft, and reduced the incidence of adverse reactions, especially Tae + MMF + Pred protocol. Adjustment of the immunosuppressant dosage and protocol, improvement of eating habits, exercise, reduction of blood pressure, reduction of blood lipid, and control of blood glucose were particularly important in preventing and controlling adverse reactions during kidney transplantation.     

Long-term results of mycophenolate mofetil as part of immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to the induction protocol resulted in a lower incidence of rejection episodes. However, the question whether MMF should be administered in combination with tacrolimus or cyclosporine has not been answered yet. In our study, we report on the long-term results of triple induction therapy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), consisting of MMF and low-dose corticosteroids, in combination with either tacrolimus or cyclosporine. METHODS: Between March 1996 and April 1997, 120 consecutive patients, who underwent OLT at our institution, were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 80 received triple induction therapy consisting of cyclosporine and MMF (40) or tacrolimus and MMF (40), in combination with low-dose corticosteroids, whereas the remaining 40 patients served as 'MMF-free' control group receiving dual induction therapy with tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Besides the eight-yr follow-up of patient and graft survival, clinical data were also reviewed for episodes of rejection and infection. Additionally, the early post-operative pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA, immunological active metabolite of MMF) were evaluated. RESULTS: Long-term results provided higher patient and graft survival after tacrolimus/MMF-based induction therapy than after cyclosporine/MMF-based induction therapy. However, the tacrolimus-based control protocol yielded similar results and, therefore, no significantly superior effect was observed when MMF was added. The same observation was made for incidence of rejection and infection episodes. AUC and C(max) of MPA increased in combination with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine. CONCLUSIONS: Although pharmacological synergy between tacrolimus and MMF was observed, MMF showed no significant beneficial effects in the immunosuppressive induction protocol, neither in combination with tacrolimus nor with cyclosporine.     

透析患者的血脂检测分析

测定３０例血液透析患者和１１例腹膜透析患者的血脂，并测定其中１１例ＨＤ患者的高密度脂蛋白亚组、脂蛋白及卵磷脂碍固醇酰基转移酶。结果透析组中仅低密度脂蛋白非常显著地升高，ＨＤＬ和载脂蛋白非常显著的下降。