Arthroscopic treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome

Ulnar impaction syndrome occurs in the setting of a central traumatic or degenerative defect in the triangular fibrocartilage complex in patients with ulnar positive variance. Chondral and subchondral edema, mechanical impingement of the articular disc, and chondromalacia of the distal ulna, proximal lunate, and proximal triquetrum produce symptoms with activity that do not improve with rest. Decreasing ulnocarpal load-sharing across the wrist with recession of the distal ulna is necessary to relieve symptoms in the majority of patients. Arthroscopic treatment with triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and arthroscopic ulnar wafer resection is an effective treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. It affords a single-stage, minimally invasive approach, with similar efficacy and fewer complications than open wafer resection or ulnar shortening osteotomy.     

Treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome with the wafer procedure

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of wafer resection of the distal ulna (the wafer procedure) as treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. Between 1995 and 1997, 26 patients were surgically treated for refractory wrist pain secondary to ulnar impaction syndrome. The diagnosis was based on physical examination, radiologic imaging, and wrist arthroscopy, and confirmatory pathoanatomy was identified at the time of surgery in all cases. The study population consisted of 18 women and 8 men, and patient age averaged 42 years. Follow-up averaged 27 months (range, 17-41 months). Twenty-three patients were completely satisfied with pain relief and the functional status of their wrists at final follow-up. Range of motion returned to baseline in the majority of cases, usually by 3 months, and grip strength increased an average of 11 kg (P < or = .005). The wafer procedure is an effective treatment alternative to ulnar-shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome and avoids the risk of nonunion and hardware-related complications.     

The treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review of the literature

Ulnar impaction syndrome is a common cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain that is thought to be a result of abutment between the ulna and the ulnar carpus. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the effectiveness of different treatment options in managing ulnar impaction syndrome. PubMed, the Cochrane database, and secondary references were reviewed to identify all English-language articles with reported results on the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome. A total of 16 articles met the criteria for review. Three procedures were identified as the most commonly used in treating this syndrome: ulnar shortening osteotomy, the wafer procedure, and the arthroscopic wafer procedure. Mean time to union and percentage nonunion for the osteotomy group was 10.3 weeks and 1.7%, respectively. The overall complication rate for patients in the ulnar shortening osteotomy group, the wafer procedure group, and the arthroscopic wafer group was 30%, 8.8%, and 21%, respectively. The authors were unable to determine a single best treatment option based on the available studies, mainly due to the variability in the reporting of subjective outcome measures. Ulnar shortening osteotomy was associated with a higher complication rate than other procedures.     

The ulnar impaction syndrome

The ulnar impaction syndrome can be defined as the impaction of the ulnar head against the triangular fibrocartilage complex and ulnar carpus resulting in progressive degeneration of those structures. The differential diagnosis in patients who present with ulnar wrist pain and limitation of motion can also include ulnar impingement syndrome and arthrosis or incongruity of the distal radioulnar joint. Structural abnormalities involving the distal radioulnar joint, distal radius, and ulnar carpus must be carefully elucidated prior to developing a treatment plan. When such abnormalities are identified and appropriately addressed, surgical treatment can be expected to be effective in the majority of cases. It is important to remember that in the absence of obvious structural abnormalities, the ulnar impaction syndrome may result from daily activities that result in excessive intermittent loading of the ulnar carpus. In this group of patients, treatment is directed at decreasing ulnar load by shortening the distal ulna in any of several ways. If relative instability of the ulnar ligamentous complex is a factor, then ulnar shortening by recession is the treatment of choice. Malunion of the distal radius resulting in ulnar impaction syndrome is best treated by addressing the deformity; that is, corrective radial osteotomy. Patients who present with a combination of ulnar impaction syndrome along with distal radioulnar joint, abnormalities must have both of these abnormalities addressed at the time of surgery. The matched ulnar resection and the hemiresection interposition arthroplasty are both effective procedures; however, the Suave-Kapandji procedure also can be used to address relative ligamentous laxity at the ulnar aspect of the wrist. The Darrach procedure is presently not recommended as a first-line treatment in these cases; however, when used as a salvage procedure, satisfactory results can be obtained in properly selected patients. Careful preoperative evaluation and planning are therefore the key to successful treatment of the ulnar impaction syndrome.     

Results of the wafer procedure for ulnar impaction syndrome in the ulnar negative and neutral wrist

Thirteen wrists with ulnar neutral or negative variance were treated by open distal ulna excision (the wafer procedure). The mean follow-up was 25 months (range, 12-38). At final follow-up grip strength had increased a mean of 14 kgf and 12 of the 13 patients were very satisfied with the functional outcome and pain relief. In treatment of the ulnar impaction syndrome, the wafer procedure provides excellent pain relief and functional restoration particularly in patients with ulnar neutral or negative wrists in whom triangular fibrocartilage tears have not yet developed.     

Ulnar shortening osteotomy in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome can be defined as a degenerative condition of the ulnar aspect of the wrist in patients with congenital or dynamic positive ulnar variance without a history of fracture or premature physeal arrest. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome and the outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy for this group of patients. METHODS: Thirty-one wrists in twenty-nine patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome were treated with an ulnar shortening osteotomy. Ulnar variance was measured on an anteroposterior radiograph of the wrist, and radioulnar distance was measured on a lateral radiograph, with the forearm in neutral rotation, to evaluate any displacement of the ulnar head from the distal aspect of the radius. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of thirty-two months. RESULTS: An average preoperative ulnar variance of +4.6 mm (range, 2 to 7.5 mm) was reduced to an average of -0.7 mm (range, -4 to +1 mm) postoperatively. Preoperatively, the modified Gartland and Werley score was an average (and standard deviation) of 69.5 +/- 7.6, with twenty-four wrists rated poor and seven rated fair. Postoperatively, the score improved to an average of 92.5 +/- 8.0, with twenty-four wrists rated excellent; five, good; one, fair; and one, poor. Dorsal subluxation of the distal aspect of the ulna was found concomitantly in nine wrists, and it was found to be reduced by the shortening osteotomy. Seven patients had cystic changes in the carpal bones preoperatively, but these were not evident one to two years after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnar shortening osteotomy improved wrist function in patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome and reduced the subluxation of the distal radioulnar joint, which is commonly found in these patients. Degenerative cystic changes of the ulnar carpal bones appear to resolve following the shortening osteotomy.     

Results of ulnar shortening osteotomy with a new plate compression system

Purpose

The gold standard for treatment of ulnar impaction has become ulnar shortening osteotomy. Previous reports in the literature have shown not only good results with relief of ulnar-sided wrist pain but also significant nonunion rates and painful hardware necessitating further surgery and potentially, metal removal. The purpose of this paper is to review the success rate of ulnar shortening osteotomy utilizing a low profile compression plate designed specifically for ulnar shortening osteotomy.

Methods

Ninety-three patients with ulnar abutment syndrome underwent ulnar shortening osteotomy with the low profile osteotomy plate. There were 47 males and 46 females. The Acumed’s ulnar shortening system was utilized in all cases. The patients were evaluated for pain, range of motion, grip strength, return to work, time to union, and hardware removal. The patients’ results were validated using the Mayo Wrist Score.

Results

There was a 100 % union rate in the 93 patients. There were no nonunions or delayed unions, or any hardware removal. All patients noted an improvement in their ulnar-sided wrist pain. Utilizing the Mayo wrist classification, the average postoperative score was 84.5. The average preoperative Mayo score was 49.4, for an average increase of 35.1 points.

Conclusion

The Acumed’s low-contact plate designed specifically for ulnar shortening osteotomy demonstrated 100 % union rate and no implant removal in our series. This is the largest study to our knowledge of a series of ulnar shortening osteotomies and successful healing without the removal of any implants. Furthermore, the specifically designed ulnar shortening osteotomy plate significantly simplifies the procedure for the surgeon and improves patient outcomes with relief of ulnar-sided wrist pain.     

Ulnar impaction

Ulnar impaction syndrome is a common source of ulnar-sided wrist pain. It is a degenerative condition that occurs secondary to excessive load across the ulnocarpal joint, resulting in a spectrum of pathologic changes and symptoms. It may occur in any wrist but is usually associated with positive ulnar variance, whether congenital or acquired. The diagnosis of ulnar impaction syndrome is made by clinical examination and is supported by radiographic studies. Surgery is indicated if nonoperative treatment fails. Although a number of alternatives exist, the 2 primary surgical options are ulnar-shortening osteotomy or partial resection of the distal dome of the ulna (wafer procedure). This article discusses the etiology of ulnar impaction syndrome, and its diagnosis and treatment.     

Oblique ulnar shortening osteotomy with a new plate and compression system

Ulnocarpal abutment or the ulnocarpal impaction syndrome occurs when excessive loads exist between the distal ulna and ulnar carpus. This overloading occurs as a result of the distal ulnar articular surface being more distal than the ulnar articular surface of the distal radius. This situation has been termed positive ulnar variance, and it can quickly lead to ulnar-sided wrist degenerative changes and functional losses. Patients often have vague, ulnar-sided complaints of chronic pain and swelling with an insidious onset that does not correlate with any specific traumatic event. Many procedures have been developed to alleviate this condition, but the gold standard for correcting positive ulnar variance is the ulnar shortening osteotomy. The goals of the shortening procedure are to relieve pain and prevent arthritis by reestablishing a neutral or slightly negative ulnar variance. We describe a new plate and compression system in which an oblique ulnar diaphyseal osteotomy is both completed and stabilized through the same jig-based system.     

Laser-assisted arthroscopic ulnar shortening

The purpose of this study is to evaluate arthroscopic ulnar shortening with the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for the treatment of ulnocarpal abutment syndrome (UAS). This is a retrospective review of the experience of a single surgeon using this technique between 1994 and 2000. Unloading the ulnocarpal joint is the recognized treatment of UAS. Ulnar shortening via a diaphyseal osteotomy and plating (USO) has been used with good results; however, nearly 50% of patients will require hardware removal. Researchers have reported similar results between open distal ulnar resection (the wafer procedure) and USO for the treatment of UAS. Researchers have also reported similar results with mechanical arthroscopic distal ulnar resections (arthroscopic wafer distal ulnar resection [AWP]) for UAS. Eleven patients who underwent Ho:YAG laser-assisted arthroscopic distal ulnar resection were retrospectively evaluated. The average follow-up time was 31 months, with a range of 7 to 61 months. Evaluation using Darrow’s criteria revealed 64% excellent (7 of 11), 18% good (2 of 11), 9% fair (1 of 11), and 9% poor (1 of 11) results. The average return to work time was 4.7 months, with a range of 1.5 to 16 months. Complications included 1 repeat surgery for ulnocarpal scar formation, 2 cases of transient tendonitis, and 1 portal site erythema without drainage that was treated with antibiotics. One patient (the one with a poor result) has not returned to work for unrelated reasons. χ- square analysis (P < .05) was unable to identify a statistical difference between the reported results of arthroscopic wafer procedures, USOs, and open wafer procedures. We concluded that Ho:YAG laser-assisted arthroscopic ulna shortening procedures show similar results to those reported for arthroscopic wafer procedures, open wafer procedures, and USOs. Return to work times are similar to those reported by other researchers, as is the return to preoperative occupation rate. There is no need for late removal of hardware, as is sometimes associated with USO. Our experience has been that the Ho:YAG laser removes hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone rapidly and with little debris, and thus facilitates the ulna shortening procedure.     

Ulnar shortening osteotomy with a premounted sliding-hole plate

BACKGROUND: Ulnar shortening osteotomy represents a common procedure for various ulnar-sided wrist disorders but is still associated with complications like malrotation, angulation, or nonunion because of incomplete closure of the osteotomy gap. We describe the use of a newly developed palmarly placed sliding-hole dynamic compression plate that allows fixation of the ulna before the oblique osteotomy is carried out. METHODS: We performed ulnar shortening osteotomy on 27 consecutive patients. The indication was ulnar impaction syndrome in 25 patients and symptomatic ulnar plus variance secondary to malunited distal radial fracture in 2 patients. The mean preoperative ulnar variance was +2.1 mm (range, +1 mm to +8 mm). All patients were evaluated before and after surgery and graded with the Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (DASH) scoring system. RESULTS: All 27 osteotomies healed uneventfully over an average of 9.2 +/- 2.1 weeks. The mean postoperative ulnar variance was -2.1 mm (range, -3.1 mm to 0 mm). There were significant improvements in DASH score, pain, and grip strength at an average follow-up of 8.1 months. Six patients complained of plate irritation. CONCLUSION: Favorable results suggest that ulnar shortening osteotomy using an oblique osteotomy and a premounted sliding-hole compression plate avoids malrotation and angulation and is associated with satisfactory outcomes. This device does not require an assisting device, which minimizes the surgical exposure of the ulna. Palmar placement of the plate seems to reduce hardware irritation.     

The "wafer" procedure. Partial distal ulnar resection.

A technique of partial resection of the distal ulna ("wafer" procedure) for the treatment of patients with symptomatic tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex or mild ulnar impaction syndrome or both is described. The distal 2-4 mm of the distal ulna is resected while preserving the distal radioulnar joint and the styloid process of the ulna and the ligaments attached to it. The triangular fibrocartilage can be debrided, repaired, or partially excised. The wafer procedure has several advantages and avoids some of the potential complications of other treatment methods.     

Mar shortening osteotomy in posttraumatic ulnar impaction syndrome

Twenty-eight patients (average age 45 years) with posttraumatic ulnar impaction syndrome underwent ulnar shortening osteotomy of 3–15 mm. Contributing factors were malunited fractures of the distal radius in 20, diaphyseal fractures of the ulna and radius in 6, resection of the radial head and a traumatic tear of the triangular fibrocartilage in 1 patient each. Evaluation at an average follow-up of 20 months showed a high rate of satisfied patients (89%), but according to Chun's modification of the Gartland-Werley score there were 1 excellent (3.5%), 11 good (39.5%), 11 fair (39.5%) and 5 poor (17.5%) results. Degenerative changes of the distal radioulnar joint were associated with fair and poor results, and ulnar shortening osteotomy is only recommended in ulnocarpal impaction with an intact distal radioulnar joint. Osteotomy fixation with 3.5 mm dynamic compression plates enabled immediate postoperative mobilisation and resulted in a low complication rate. There was no advantage for the technically more demanding oblique as compared with a transverse osteotomy.     

Wafer distal ulna resection for triangular fibrocartilage tears and/or ulna impaction syndrome.

Partial resection of the distal ulna (wafer resection) has been used to treat patients with symptomatic tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex or mild ulna impaction syndrome. In this procedure, the distal 2 to 4 mm of the distal ulnar head is resected while preserving the ulnar styloid process and the ligaments attached to it. The triangular fibrocartilage is debrided, repaired, or partially excised as necessary. The procedure is contraindicated if there is more than 4 mm of positive ulnar variance. Thirteen wafer resections of the distal ulna were performed in 12 patients. All had good to excellent results after a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Wafer resection has specific advantages and avoids many of the potential complications of distal ulna recession and ulnar head resection for patients with the conditions described. The procedure is not indicated if instability or degenerative arthritis of the distal radioulnar joint is present or if there is carpal instability.     

Anatomic and biomechanical analysis of the arthroscopic wafer procedure.

The ulnar impaction syndrome is a common clinical entity that is most often associated with positive ulnar variance and is characterized by triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), lunate, and/or distal ulnar pathology. Traditional treatment for symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome has been conservative; however, in cases refractory to nonoperative management, formal ulnar shortening has been successful in long-term clinical series. Recently, arthroscopic ulnar shortening, the "arthroscopic wafer procedure" (AWP) (debridement of the perforated TFCC margins and limited ulnar head resection using a motorized burr) has become an option to treat this clinical syndrome. In an attempt to evaluate the biomechanical efficacy of the AWP, an experimental study was undertaken using nine ulnar positive cadaver forearms. Each specimen was evaluated biomechanically using axial load cells and pressure-sensitive film to evaluate the effect of serial resection of the TFCC and distal ulna on axial load and ulnar carpal pressures. The results of this experimental study revealed a statistically significant unloading of the ulnar aspect of the wrist after excision of the centrum of the TFCC and resection of the radial two-thirds width of the ulnar head, to a depth of subchondral bone resection. Furthermore, additional bony resection tended to correlate favorably with the stage of TFCC pathology noted, i.e., the more advanced the stage, the more resection necessary to unload the ulnar aspect of the wrist. Based on this biomechanical study, a limited clinical series has been initiated with early favorable results. The AWP biomechanically unloads the ulnar carpal complex, and therefore has a theoretical potential of relieving the symptoms of the ulnar impaction syndrome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mid-Term Results Following Ulna Shortening Osteotomy

Background

Successful short-term results of diaphyseal ulna shortening osteotomy are documented in both idiopathic and post-traumatic ulnar impaction.

Questions/Purposes

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy with respect to radiographic assessment of corrected alignment and healing as well as patient satisfaction, pain, and function assessed using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective case series included follow-up of 33 patients with ulnar impaction syndrome following ulna shortening osteotomy at a minimum of 5 years. Patient-rated outcomes included satisfaction, pain assessment, and DASH score. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were reviewed to quantify ulnar variance and osteotomy union rates. Subsequent operations were also recorded.

Results

Average follow-up was 10 years (range, 5–20 years). Eighty-eight percent of patients reported they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the procedure and 91% reported they would have the same procedure again. Average pain rating was 2 out of 10 at final follow-up. The mean DASH score was 11 (range, 0–39). Removal of hardware was performed in 10 patients (30%). The overall rate of reoperation was 45%.

Conclusions

Ulna shortening osteotomy yields reliable midterm satisfaction and pain relief in patients with idiopathic and post-traumatic ulnar impaction syndrome. Reoperation is frequent. Consistent with results of short-term follow-up, plate irritation requiring removal remains the most common cause for reoperation over time.     

Subcapital ulnar shortening osteotomy

Ulnar shortening osteotomy is the standard treatment for the condition of ulnocarpal impaction. Traditionally ulnar shortening osteotomy has been performed in the diaphysis and secured with a 3.5 mm plate. Delayed union, nonunion, and symptomatic hardware have been cited as detractors of this technique. A number of alternatives have consequently been proposed that range from different hardware to different patterns of osteotomy to resection of the distal portion of the ulnar head. This article describes one method for ulnar shortening osteotomy that seeks to draw upon the advantages of several of these variations in order to minimize complications.     

Volar ligament release and distal radius dome osteotomy for correction of Madelung's deformity

PURPOSE: Madelung's deformity is usually recognized near the completion of skeletal growth and corrective osteotomy of the radius is frequently performed to treat the deformity and reduce pain. This study reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of a volar approach, ligament release, and dome osteotomy technique for treatment of this deformity. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2000, 26 wrists in 18 patients were treated with a volar ligament release and dome osteotomy of the distal radius. The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 13 years. All patients were available for review at an average of 23 months after surgery. Radiographs before surgery and at final follow-up evaluation were analyzed for the extent of correction. RESULTS: All patients treated with this corrective osteotomy reported a reduction in pain and improved appearance. Patients showed improvements in forearm supination and wrist extension, with no loss of pronation or flexion. Improvements in the radiographic parameters of radial inclination and lunate subsidence also were observed. Four wrists required concurrent ulnar-sided surgery, and 3 additional wrists required staged ulnar shortening. One patient required a Darrach resection 3 years after the index procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The results of volar dome osteotomy provide improved range of motion, improved appearance, radiographic correction, and pain relief while preserving soft-tissue support for radial rotation around the distal ulna. Long-term follow-up evaluation is ongoing.