Long-term clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in Chinese geriatric patients

Background & Objective Little is known about the relative efficacies of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome for geriatric patients who received either DES or BMS. Methods From January 2002 to October 2005, 199 consecutive Chinese geriatric patients (≥ 75 years old) underwent PCI with coronary DES or BMS implantation at our institution. We analyzed the major clinical end points that included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis, and bleeding complications. Results The three-year cumulative rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and myocardial infarction were significantly lower in the DES group (6.3%, 3.6%, 5.4%) compared with the BMS group (16.2%, 11.5%, 14.9%; P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the three-year cumulative rate for target lesion revascularization (6.3% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.61) or stent thrombosis (3.6% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.70). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in the cumulative rate for intracranial hemorrhage, or major and minor hemorrhage at three years. Conclusions DES-based PCI was associated with a significant reduction in the three-year cumulative rate of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and myocardial infarction compared with BMS, without increased risk of TLR, stent thrombosis, or bleeding complications at three years in this group of Chinese geriatric patients.     

Percutaneous revascularization strategies in small-vessel disease

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of small coronary vessels represents a real challenge for myocardial revascularization because of the high risk of stent-restenosis and increased risk of adverse clinical events. Moreover, small coronary arteries supply small myocardial territories therefore questioning the clinical significance of small-vessel stenoses. The definition of small-vessel disease and PCI-strategies used are very heterogeneous across studies. The present review will focus on percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease.     

Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents during Extended Follow-up

Background

Several observational reports have documented both increased and decreased cardiac mortality or Q-wave myocardial infarction with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents.

Methods

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents early after intervention (<1 year) and late (>1 year) among a broad population of patients, using a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Results

We identified 28 trials with a total of 10,727 patients and a mean follow-up of 29.6 months. For early outcomes (<1 year), all-cause mortality for drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents was 2.1% versus 2.4% (risk ratio [RR] 0.91, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-1.18]; P = .47), non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was 3.3% versus 4.4% (RR 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-1.00]; P = .055), target lesion revascularization was 5.8% versus 18.4% (RR 0.28 [95% CI, 0.21-0.38]; P <.001), and stent thrombosis was 1.1% versus 1.3% (RR 0.87 [95% CI, 0.60-1.26]; P = .47). For late outcomes (>1 year), all-cause mortality for drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents was 5.9% versus 5.7% (RR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.83-1.28]; P = .79), target lesion revascularization was 4.0% versus 3.3% (RR 1.22 [95% CI, 0.92-1.60]; P = .16), non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was 1.6% versus 1.2% (RR 1.36 [95% CI, 0.74-2.53]; P = .32) and stent thrombosis was 0.7% versus 0.1% (RR 4.57 [95% CI, 1.54-13.57]; P = .006).

Conclusions

There was no excess mortality with drug-eluting stents. Within 1 year, drug-eluting stents appear to be safe and efficacious with possibly decreased non-Q-wave myocardial infarction compared with bare-metal stents. After 1 year, drug-eluting stents still have similar mortality, despite increased stent thrombosis. The reduction in target lesion revascularization with drug-eluting stents mainly happens within 1 year, but is sustained thereafter.     

Long-term Outcomes of Drug-eluting versus Bare-metal stent for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background

Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remain uncertain.

Objective

To investigate long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

We performed search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and ISI Web of Science (until February 2013) for randomized trials comparing more than 12-month efficacy or safety of DES with BMS in patients with STEMI. Pooled estimate was presented with risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects model.

Results

Ten trials with 7,592 participants with STEMI were included. The overall results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death and definite/probable stent thrombosis between DES and BMS at long-term follow-up. Patients receiving DES implantation appeared to have a lower 1-year incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction than those receiving BMS (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.00, p= 0.05). Moreover, the risk of target vessel revascularization (TVR) after receiving DES was consistently lowered during long-term observation (all p< 0.01). In subgroup analysis, the use of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) was associated with reduced risk of stent thrombosis in STEMI patients (RR = 0.37, p=0.02).

Conclusions

DES did not increase the risk of stent thrombosis in patients with STEMI compared with BMS. Moreover, the use of DES did lower long-term risk of repeat revascularization and might decrease the occurrence of reinfarction.     

Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in acute coronary syndrome

Compared with medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention has been shown to reduce the rates of death and recurrent ischemia in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In the current interventional era, both drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) have been widely used, despite the fact that the use of DES in the context of ACS was initially an “off-label” indication and that ACS has been associated with stent thrombosis (ST). In contrast to the wealth of data available for the use of DES in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, data regarding the performance of DES in non–ST-elevation ACS is restricted to a handful of registries with conflicting data. The aim of this review was to summarize the safety and efficacy of DES in the entire spectrum of ACS.     

Clinical outcomes of patients treated with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent: Meta-analysis of randomized trials

Backgrounds

The Nobori is a new-generation, biodegradable-polymer coated, biolimus-eluting stent (BES) that has recently been investigated in several randomized trials with inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Nobori BES versus other drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

We undertook a meta-analysis of randomized trials investigating Nobori BES versus other DES. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), respectively. Secondary outcomes were the composite of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI)/target vessel revascularization (TVR), MI and death.

Results

A total of 9114 PCI-patients randomly received Nobori BES (n = 5080) or other DES (n = 4034). This latter group comprised patients receiving everolimus- (n = 2533), sirolimus- (n = 1376) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (n = 125). Median follow-up was 11 months [interquartile range 9–12]. The Nobori BES versus other DES showed comparable risk of TLR (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.91 [0.57–1.46], p = 0.71). There was significant heterogeneity across trials due to significant lower TLR risk with Nobori BES versus paclitaxel-eluting stent (0.32 [0.10–0.98], p = 0.046; p for interaction = 0.009). Nobori BES versus other DES showed comparable risk of definite/probable ST (1.40 [0.66–2.97], p = 0.39), cardiac death/MI/TVR (1.05 [0.88–1.25], p = 0.59), MI (1.13 [0.87–1.48], p = 0.37) and death (1.09 [0.81–1.48], p = 0.56).

Conclusions

Nobori BES has comparable efficacy with other limus-eluting stents at 1-year follow-up. There is no difference in terms of safety profile between these stent platforms.     

Stent thrombosis is not increased following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus taking metformin

Objective

Recent studies have suggested that metformin may inhibit endothelialization following limus-eluting stent (LES) placement and may increase the risk of stent thrombosis. Therefore, we assessed the impact of metformin on stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients who receive drug-eluting stents (DES).

Methods

We assessed the impact of metformin and stent type on stent thrombosis, MACE, and death in NIDDM patients following DES placement. Of the 1201 patients included, 74.8% received LES, 25.2% received paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), and 55% were taking metformin.

Results

There was no difference in stent thrombosis, regardless of stent type or metformin use. While Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated reduced MACE (p = 0.007) and death (p = 0.006) with metformin use, multivariate analysis demonstrated that stent type and metformin use were not associated with outcome.

Conclusion

In NIDDM patients, metformin use or stent type following DES placement did not increase stent thrombosis and MACE rates.     

Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention using rotational atherectomy and new-generation drug-eluting stents for calcified coronary artery lesions in patients with chronic kidney disease

AimCoronary artery calcification is an important factor influencing revascularisation outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Lesion preparation using rotational atherectomy (RA) may help adequately modify calcified plaques and facilitate the achievement of optimal clinical outcomes in these patients. In this study, we assessed the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using RA followed by new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with CKD and calcified coronary artery disease (CAD).Methods and resultsFrom November 2014 to October 2019, a total of 203 patients with calcified CAD who underwent RA followed by second- or third-generation DES implantation at our centre were included in the study. Mild, moderate, and severe CKD was present in 38%, 55.5%, and 6.5% of the patients, respectively. Diffused coronary calcifications were present in 85%. Procedural success was 97.5% with minimal periprocedural complications. In-stent restenosis occurred in one patient (0.5%); major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were reported in 22 patients (10.8%); cardiac death occurred in eight patients during follow-up.ConclusionPercutaneous coronary intervention using RA followed by second- or third-generation DES implantation is feasible and safe with high procedural success and low in-stent restenosis in CKD patients with calcified coronary lesions.     

Simultaneous late stent thrombosis in two coronary arteries following drug-eluting stent implantation

Late stent thrombosis has emerged as an infrequent but serious complication of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Premature cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy is the most common risk factor for its occurrence. In the era of multivessel stenting with DES, there is a potential for multivessel late stent thrombosis following cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy. We present a rare case of a patient who sustained simultaneous late stent thromboses in DESs implanted in two coronary arteries as a result of premature cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy.     

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for complex chronic total occlusions

Purpose

This analysis of a consecutive series of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) implanted for complex chronic total occlusions (CTOs) was done to evaluate the potential of this device to avoid a permanent full metal jacket with drug-eluting stents.

Five-year clinical outcome of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Long-term follow-up from the TITAX AMI trial

Background

The TITAX-AMI randomized controlled trial demonstrated a better clinical outcome with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents (BAS) as compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) at 2-year follow-up, in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to present the 5-year clinical outcome of the TITAX-AMI trial.

Methods

A total of 425 patients with acute MI were randomly assigned to receive either BAS (214), or PES (211). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of cardiac death, recurrent MI or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Clinical follow-up was performed to 5 years.

Results

The 5-year cumulative incidence of MACE was significantly lower in patients assigned to BAS as compared with those assigned to PES (16.4% versus 25.1%, respectively, p = 0.03). Similarly, the 5-year rates of cardiac death and recurrent MI were significantly lower in patients assigned to BAS (1.9% versus 5.7%, and 8.4% versus 18.0%, p = 0.04 and p = 0.004, respectively). Yet, the rates of ischemia-driven TLR were similar between the two study groups (11.2% versus 10.9%, respectively, p = 0.92). The rate of definite stent thrombosis (ST) was again significantly lower in patients assigned to BAS (0.9% versus 7.1%, respectively, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

In the current prospective randomized TITAX-AMI trial, among patients presenting with acute MI who underwent early PCI, BAS achieved a better clinical outcome as compared with PES at 5-year follow-up, as reflected by lower cumulative rates of overall MACE, cardiac death, recurrent MI, and definite ST; yet, with statistically similar rates of ischemia-driven TLR.     

Real-world five-year outcomes of FlexyRap? cobalt-chromium rapamycin-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer in patients with de-novo coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND The use of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents(BP-DES) has been proven to minimize restenosis and stent thrombosis. The current post-marketing monitoring was observed at the 5-year clinical outcomes of individuals who had been treated with FlexyRap^? DES in the real world.AIM To assess the safety and effectiveness of FlexyRap^? DES at the 5-year follow-up in real-world settings.METHODS Findings from a retrospective, multi-center, observational, post-market cl...     

Coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus:Recent treatment strategies and future perspectives

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) are at a higher risk of developing coronary artery disease(CAD) than are non-T2 DM patients. Moreover, the clinical outcomes in CAD with T2 DM are poor despite improvements in medications and other interventions. Coronary artery bypass grafting is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention in treating multivessel coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. However, selecting a revascularization strategy depends not only on the lesion complexity but also on the patient’s medical history and comorbidities. Additionally, comprehensive risk management with medical and non-pharmacological therapies is important, as is confirmation regarding whether the risk-management strategies are being appropriately achieved. Furthermore, non-pharmacological interventions using exercise and diet during the earlier stages of glucose metabolism abnormalities, such as impaired glucose tolerance, might be beneficial in preventing the development or progression of T2 DM and in reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular events.     

Late stent fracture – A potential role of left ventricular dilatation

Background

Coronary stent fracture is an under-recognized event but one that has been reported frequently in the drug-eluting stent era. Most reported cases of stent fracture occurred within days to two years after implantation, and are related to stent thrombosis and restenosis.

Case report

Presentation of a 69-year-old male with a history of arterial hypertension and previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and with implantation of three overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) on proximal-to-middle left anterior descending artery (LAD). At five-year outpatient evaluation, the patient was found to have a new left bundle branch block associated with mild elevation in Troponin-I value and severe left ventricular dysfunction. The patient recovered as non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and consequently a new coronary angiography showed total occlusion of proximal LAD with multiple stent fracture. Here we discuss the role of left ventricular dilatation as a contributing factor to late drug-eluting stent fracture.

Conclusion

Different anatomical coronary settings have been described as predisposing factors to stent fracture. Consequently, the remodeling of the left ventricle, together with the rise in diastolic pressure, may have affected the shear stress of LAD stents by increasing mechanical forces produced in the diastolic phase on the epicardial vessel. In addition, left ventricular enlargement could have increased the elongation forces on the stent frames by altering the curvature of the stent. All predisposing factors of stent fracture, including coronary and left ventricular issues, need to be considered before stent implantation to avoid stent fracture and clinical sequelae.