Famotidine relieves symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and heals erosions and ulcerations. Results of a multicenter, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. USA Merck Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group.

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy of famotidine 40 mg administered at bedtime (HS), 20 mg given twice daily (BID), and placebo to relieve heartburn and to heal endoscopically documented esophageal erosions or ulcerations. A total of 338 patients were randomized: 135 to receive famotidine 40 mg HS, 137 to receive famotidine 20 mg BID, and 66 to receive placebo. In the group given famotidine 20 mg BID, there was a significantly greater proportion of patients with complete relief of daytime heartburn, and both famotidine groups demonstrated statistically significant advantages over placebo in global scores or by successful outcome. Antacid consumption was significantly reduced in the group given famotidine 20 mg BID as compared with placebo. Both famotidine regimens resulted in a significantly greater proportion of patients with complete endoscopic healing than placebo, with the BID dosing being numerically superior to the 40-mg HS dose.     

Two doses of omeprazole versus placebo in symptomatic erosive esophagitis: the U.S. Multicenter Study.

Two hundred thirty patients with reflux symptoms and endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis were enrolled from 15 U.S. centers into a randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study comparing placebo with omeprazole, 20 or 40 mg given once daily in the morning. Esophagitis grade 2 was present in 44% of patients, grade 3 in 37% of patients, and grade 4 in 19% of patients. Endpoints, defined as complete relief of heartburn and complete esophageal mucosal healing, were assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Both omeprazole doses were significantly superior to placebo in complete endoscopic healing. After 8 weeks of treatment, 73.5% of patients in the 20-mg omeprazole group and 74.7% in the 40-mg omeprazole group, compared with 14.0% in the placebo group, had complete healing of the esophageal mucosa. At the end of the study, complete relief of daytime heartburn was obtained in 79.5% of patients in the 20-mg omeprazole group, 81.6% in the 40-mg omeprazole group, and 37.2% in the placebo group (P less than or equal to 0.05). Complete relief of nighttime heartburn was noted by 79.5% of patients in the 20-mg omeprazole group, 85.1% in the 40-mg omeprazole group, and 34.9% in the placebo group (P less than or equal to 0.05). The median time to complete relief of daytime and nighttime heartburn occurred earlier in the 40-mg group than in the 20-mg group (9 vs. 17 days and 9 vs. 20 days, respectively); however, these differences were not statistically significant. Relief of acid regurgitation and dysphagia also occurred earlier in the 40-mg group. Omeprazole was well tolerated in this group of patients. No unexpected adverse experiences occurred. The results of this study confirm those of six multicenter, international trials in which omeprazole in doses of 20-60 mg provided a degree of esophageal mucosal healing and complete relief of reflux symptoms superior to any other medical treatment.     

Lansoprazole compared with ranitidine for the treatment of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, proton pump inhibitors are used primarily for patients with esophagitis. However, patients with nonerosive reflux disease may also benefit from these powerful medications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and symptom relief efficacy of lansoprazole with ranitidine therapy and with placebo. METHODS: In 2 randomized, double-blind, multicenter trials of 901 patients with symptomatic reflux disease, which was confirmed by endoscopy to be nonerosive, received lansoprazole, 15 or 30 mg once daily; ranitidine, 150 mg twice daily; or placebo for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Analysis of daily diary data during the first 4 weeks and for the entire 8 weeks of treatment revealed that patients who were treated with either dosage of lansoprazole reported significantly (P<.05) lower percentages of days and nights with heartburn, less pain severity of both day and night heartburn, fewer days of antacid use, and smaller amounts of antacid use compared with patients who were treated with ranitidine or placebo. The incidence of possible or probable treatment-related adverse reactions was comparable among the treatment groups; abdominal pain and diarrhea were the most commonly reported adverse events. No statistically significant differences were noted between treatment groups in laboratory analyses. CONCLUSION: Lansoprazole therapy is more effective than standard dosages of ranitidine or placebo in relieving symptoms in patients with endoscopically confirmed non-erosive reflux esophagitis.     

Efficacy of Rabeprazole in the Treatment of Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The purpose of this study was to assess the rapidity of symptom relief and 4-week efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg in patients with moderately severe nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Data were analyzed from 2 similarly designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, U.S. trials. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients (N = 261) were randomized to 4 weeks of rabeprazole 20 mg once daily or placebo. Patients kept symptom diaries and scored symptom severity. Median time to first 24-hour heartburn-free interval was 3.5 days for the rabeprazole group compared with 19.5 days for the placebo group (P ≤ .0002). Complete heartburn relief at week 4 was 32% with rabeprazole and 3.8% with placebo (P ≤ .001). Rabeprazole also significantly improved other GERD-associated symptoms (e.g., regurgitation, belching, early satiety) by week 4 compared with placebo (P ≤ .05). Rabeprazole provides fast and potent relief from heartburn and other symptoms of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Supported by Eisai Inc., Teaneck, New Jersey, and Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Titusville, New Jersey.     

法莫替丁治疗反流性食管炎多中心临床观察

目的　探讨不同剂量法莫替丁 (商品名 :高舒达 )对反流性食管炎 (RE)的疗效。方法　上海地区 4家医院将 89例经内镜证实的 (洛杉矶分级A级和B级 )RE患者随机分为两组 ,A组 4 6例予以法莫替丁 2 0mg ,每日 2次 ;B组 4 3例予以双倍剂量 ,即 4 0mg ,每日 2次。分别于治疗后 2、4、6、8及 12周观察烧心、反酸、胸痛等症状疗效 ,并于 12周后复查胃镜 ,观察镜下愈合率 ,A组中 9例、B组中 10例患者分别与治疗前及治疗后进行食管 2 4hpH监测。 结果　法莫替丁治疗 2周 ,即可见症状明显改善 ,症状记分较治疗前明显下降 (P <0 .0 1) ,继续用药至第 12周 ,症状记分较第 2周亦显著下降 (P <0 .0 1) ,两组在治疗前及治疗后不同时间症状积分下降值均差异无显著性。治疗 12周时 ,A组症状消失率为 5 2 .17% ,总有效率为 84 .78% ;B组症状消失率为 4 8.83% ,总有效率为 88.37%。两组在症状消失率及有效率方面均差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。A组食管炎内镜下愈合率为 4 7.83% ,有效率为 82 .6 1% ;B组愈合率为 4 6 .5 1% ,有效率为 86 .0 5 %。两组在内镜下食管炎愈合率及有效率方面均差异无显著性(P >0 .0 5 )。食管 2 4hpH监测显示 ,法莫替丁 4 0mg ,每日 2次患者食管酸暴露次数较治疗前明显减少(P <0 .0 5 )。结论　法莫     

Oral pantoprazole for erosive esophagitis: a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Pantoprazole US GERD Study Group

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this dose-response study was to compare the effectiveness of 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg of pantoprazole with that of placebo tablets in the healing and symptom relief of gastroesophageal reflux disease associated with erosive esophagitis, and to determine the optimal dose. METHODS: A total of 603 patients with endoscopically confirmed (Hetzel-Dent scale) erosive esophagitis of grade 2 (64.5%) or grades 3 or 4 (35.3%) were enrolled in a double-blind, multicenter study and randomly assigned to receive pantoprazole (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) or placebo, administered once daily in the morning, for 4 or 8 wk depending on healing. RESULTS: The healing rates after 4 wk for placebo and pantoprazole 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg/day were 14%, 42%, 55%, and 72%, respectively (p < 0.001 for all doses of pantoprazole vs placebo). Cumulative healing rates after 8 wk for placebo and pantoprazole 10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg/day were 33%, 59%, 78%, and 88%, respectively (p < 0.001 for all doses of pantoprazole vs placebo). The 40-mg pantoprazole dose produced greater rates of healing and earlier healing of esophagitis than either the 10- or 20-mg dose, regardless of severity. Pantoprazole, at any dose, was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving reflux symptoms. Patients on pantoprazole 40 mg experienced relief of symptoms on day 1 of treatment. No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole was safe and effective for healing erosive esophagitis and provided rapid symptomatic relief. These results indicate that pantoprazole offers a new option for treatment of erosive esophagitis. Among the three doses studied, the 40-mg dose was the most effective.     

Rabeprazole in nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: Clinical results to date suggest that antisecretory therapy may be less effective in providing symptom relief for patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than for patients with erosive disease. This study was carried out to assess the efficacy and rapidity of once-daily rabeprazole (10 mg or 20 mg) in relieving symptoms in endoscopically negative patients with moderately severe GERD symptoms and to evaluate the safety of these doses over 4 wk. METHODS: This placebo-controlled, double blind study enrolled 203 men and women with moderately severe symptoms of GERD. After a 2-wk, single-blind placebo run-in phase, patients were randomized to receive 10 mg or 20 mg of rabeprazole or placebo once daily for 4 wk. RESULTS: Rabeprazole rapidly and effectively relieved heartburn, with significant improvements on day 1 of dosing. It also improved most other GERD-related symptoms, including regurgitation, belching, bloating, early satiety, and nausea. Both rabeprazole doses were significantly superior to the placebo with respect to time to the first 24-h heartburn-free interval (2.5 and 4.5 days for 10 mg and 20 mg of rabeprazole, respectively, vs 21.5 days for the placebo) and first daytime or nighttime heartburn-free interval (1.5-3 days for rabeprazole groups vs 12.5-15 days for the placebo), as well as to percentage of time patients were heartburn-free and free of antacid use. Both rabeprazole doses were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings and prior studies, rabeprazole reliably relieves GI symptoms equally well in both nonerosive GERD and erosive GERD.     

Efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of symptomatic acid reflux disease without esophagitis

BACKGROUND: Up to three quarters of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have symptoms, such as heartburn, but no macroscopic evidence of erosive esophagitis, making symptomatic GERD a common clinical problem in the primary care setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily; omeprazole, 10 mg once daily; and placebo in the treatment of symptomatic GERD without erosive esophagitis. METHODS: Patients with a history of heartburn (> or =12 months) and episodes of moderate to severe heartburn on 4 or more of the 7 days before endoscopy were eligible to participate in this 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The absence of erosive esophagitis was established through endoscopy. Eligible patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: omeprazole, 20 mg once daily; omeprazole, 10 mg once daily; or placebo. Patients were assessed at weeks 2 and 4. The efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of heartburn was determined mainly through the following diary card data: daily resolution of heartburn and complete resolution of heartburn every day during 1 week of treatment. The efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of acid regurgitation, dysphagia, epigastric pain, and nausea was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 359 randomized patients, 355 were included in the statistical analysis (intention-to-treat population). Daily proportions of patients with no heartburn were consistently greater in the 20-mg omeprazole group (62%, day 7; 74%, day 27) than in the 10-mg omeprazole group (41%, day 7; 49%, day 27) or the placebo group (14%, day 7; 23%; day 27). Complete resolution of heartburn every day during the last treatment week was significantly (P< or =.002) higher in the 20-mg omeprazole group (48%) than in the 10-mg omeprazole (27%) or placebo (5%) group. Omeprazole was significantly (P< or =.003) more effective than placebo for the treatment of acid regurgitation, dysphagia, epigastric pain, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptomatic GERD require profound acid suppression to achieve symptomatic relief. Omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, was superior to omeprazole, 10 mg once daily, and to placebo in providing early and sustained resolution of heartburn, as well as treatment of other troublesome GERD symptoms.     

Symptom-relieving effect of esomeprazole 40 mg daily in patients with heartburn

BACKGROUND: To assess symptom relief in patients with heartburn following treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg daily. METHODS: Patients with heartburn (for > or = 6 months) were assessed in this double-blind, multicenter study. After a 3-day single-blind placebo run-in, 440 patients were randomized to esomeprazole 40 mg o.d., esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 14 days. Heartburn symptoms were recorded daily; as insufficient patients had data available from days 13 and 14, analyses included data up to day 12. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was diagnosed by upper GI endoscopy and 24-h pH-monitoring. The primary end-point was total heartburn relief defined as no heartburn symptoms during the preceding 24-h period. RESULTS: 240 patients had erosive esophagitis (EO) and 114 patients had GERD defined by pH-monitoring. Proportions of patients with total heartburn relief increased during the first days of treatment and stabilized after Day 4. Total heartburn relief occurred in 67%-73%, 62%-70%, and 21%-32% of patients in the esomeprazole 40 mg o.d., esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., and placebo groups, respectively, between days 6 and 12. Proportions of patients with total heartburn relief were higher in patients with EO (71%-80% of patients from Day 4 onwards) compared to those without EO (52%-67% of patients from Day 4 onwards). Figures for patients diagnosed by pH-monitoring were 65%-73% of those with a positive diagnosis and 51%-58% with a negative diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole 40 mg o.d. treatment produces total heartburn relief in a high proportion of patients with GERD. Once-daily esomeprazole 40 mg dosing is recommended as no advantage was gained by splitting the dose.     

Efficacy and safety of omeprazole in Japanese patients with nonerosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND: There is increasing awareness of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) as a disease requiring treatment in Japan. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of omeprazole 10 mg and 20 mg once daily in Japanese patients with NERD. METHODS: Patients with heartburn for at least 2 days a week during the month before entry into the study and no endoscopic signs of a mucosal break (grade M or N according to Hoshihara's modification of the Los Angeles classification) were randomly assigned to one of three groups (omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg, or placebo) once daily for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Overall, 355 patients were enrolled, of whom 284 were randomly assigned to one of the three groups (omeprazole 10 mg, n = 96; omeprazole 20 mg, n = 93; placebo, n = 95). The rate of complete resolution of heartburn in week 4 was significantly higher in patients treated with omeprazole 10 mg [32.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 22.9%-41.6%] or 20 mg (25.8%, 95% CI, 16.9%-34.7%) than in the placebo group (12.0%, 95% CI, 5.3%-18.6%). No significant difference between the two omeprazole groups was observed. The rate of complete resolution of heartburn by omeprazole was similar between patients with grade M and those with grade N esophagus. Omeprazole also increased the rate of sufficient relief from heartburn. Omeprazole was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg once daily is effective and well tolerated in patients with NERD regardless of their endoscopic classification.     

On-demand therapy with pantoprazole 20 mg as effective long-term management of reflux disease in patients with mild GERD: the ORION trial

AIMS: To compare safety and efficacy of on-demand pantoprazole 20 mg/40 mg versus placebo in the long-term management of patients with mild gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after heartburn relief. METHODS: A total of 634 patients with endoscopically confirmed GERD grade 0/I and heartburn were included. During the acute phase, patients were treated with pantoprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 weeks. Those patients relieved from heartburn entered the long-term phase, and were randomly assigned to either treatment group pantoprazole 20 mg, 40 mg or placebo. Over 6 months, patients took study medication on demand (antacids as rescue medication) and discontinued the drug once symptoms abated. RESULTS: After 4 weeks a total of 87.1%/90.0% of patients were free of heartburn (ITT/PP), and entered the subsequent long-term phase. The perceived average daily symptom load (placebo: 3.93, pantoprazole 20 mg: 2.91, pantoprazole 40 mg: 2.71, ITT) and the number of antacid tablets taken (average number, placebo: 0.68, pantoprazole 20 mg: 0.45, pantoprazole 40 mg: 0.33, ITT) were significantly higher in the placebo than in both pantoprazole groups (p<0.0001), with no statistically significant difference between the two pantoprazole groups. The discontinuation rate due to insufficient control of heartburn was significantly lower in both pantoprazole groups compared to placebo (placebo: 10.9, pantoprazole 20 mg: 2.8, pantoprazole 40 mg: 0.9, ITT). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings favor on-demand treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg for the long-term management of heartburn in patients with uncomplicated GERD (grade 0/I) with superiority to placebo.     

Helicobacter pylori infection influences symptomatic response to anti-secretory therapy in patients with GORD—crossover comparative study with famotidine and low-dose lansoprazole

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Helicobacter pylori infection was reported to affect gastric acid secretion. We investigated the heartburn symptoms of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease during sequential treatment with 40 mg of famotidine or 15 mg of lansoprazole to clarify whether H. pylori infection influences symptomatic response to anti-secretory therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 33 gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients, who had already been treated with a full dose of H2 receptor antagonist. First, famotidine at 20 mg b.i.d. was administered to the patients for 8 weeks. Second, famotidine was replaced with 15 mg of lansoprazole once in the morning for 8 weeks. Finally, 20 mg of famotidine was administered b.i.d. for 8 weeks instead of lansoprazole. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms were assessed using an original visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The sequential symptomatic responses to famotidine and lansoprazole administration indicated that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms of patients during low-dose lansoprazole treatment were significantly less than those during famotidine treatment. Remission of symptoms was obtained significantly more often by famotidine therapy in patients with H. pylori infection than in patients without H. pylori infection. CONCLUSION: Low-dose lansoprazole is more effective than full-dose famotidine for the control of symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and H. pylori infection influences the symptomatic response to H2 receptor antagonists.     

On-demand treatment of acute heartburn with the antacid hydrotalcite compared with famotidine and placebo: randomized double-blind cross-over study

BACKGROUND: Antacids are widely used in the self-treatment of gastroesophageal reflux-induced complaints, but respective studies are lacking. GOALS: To compare the efficacy and safety of hydrotalcite with the H2 receptor antagonist famotidine and placebo in the on-demand treatment of acute heartburn under daily practice conditions. STUDY: Five hundred sixty-two individuals in 4 centers were randomized in a double-blind, double-dummy, 3-fold cross-over study to single-dose treatments of 1000 mg hydrotalcite, 10 mg famotidine, or placebo. Heartburn severity and relief was measured with numerical and visual rating scales. RESULTS: A significantly better heartburn relief score was achieved 60 minutes after administration of hydrotalcite compared with placebo (primary end point, P<0.0001). Better efficacy was also observed 30 minutes and 3 hours after the intake of hydrotalcite in comparison with famotidine or placebo. A significant decrease in heartburn severity compared with placebo occurred within 10 minutes for hydrotalcite and was faster compared with both controls. CONCLUSIONS: For subjects self-administering antacids for episodic heartburn, antacid hydrotalcite provides symptom relief significantly faster and, within the first 3 hours postdosing, more effective than famotidine or placebo. These results suggest that on-demand treatment of hydrotalcite is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for heartburn.     

Suppression of nocturnal acid secretion with famotidine accelerates gastric ulcer healing

Although nocturnal acid secretion has been emphasized in the pathophysiology and treatment of duodenal ulcer, its importance in gastric ulcer disease has been questioned. To explore this area, this multicenter U.S. trial compared the effect of a once-daily nighttime dose of H2-receptor antagonist with placebo on the healing of gastric ulcer and relief of associated symptoms. One hundred fifty-seven patients with endoscopically verified benign gastric ulcers were randomized in a double-blind fashion to either famotidine (40 mg at bedtime) or placebo. Antacid tablets were allowed as needed. The healing rates for famotidine were 45%, 66%, and 78% at weeks 4, 6, and 8, respectively. In comparison, placebo healing rates were 39%, 44%, and 64%. These differences were statistically significant in favor of famotidine at weeks 6 (p less than or equal to 0.01) and 8 (p less than or equal to 0.05), as well as in a life-table analysis (p less than or equal to 0.05). Nocturnal famotidine was also significantly better than placebo with respect to time to complete relief of pain and to the percentage of patients with complete relief of pain. No concomitant factor (including ulcer size, ulcer location, smoking history, or regular alcohol use) affected healing rates in this study. Famotidine was well-tolerated and no serious clinical or laboratory adverse effects were judged to be related to this dosing regimen of famotidine. In conclusion, suppression of nocturnal acid secretion with famotidine (40 mg at bedtime) was more effective than placebo in promoting the healing of acute benign gastric ulcer and its associated symptoms. The results of this study suggest that suppression of nocturnal acid secretion alone is as effective as "around the clock" acid suppression in the healing of benign gastric ulcer.     

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of nocturnal and twice-a-day famotidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer disease

The efficacy and safety of famotidine, a potent new long-acting H2-receptor antagonist, was compared with placebo in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in the United States. A total of 384 patients with endoscopically proven acute duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled. Patients received either famotidine or a placebo. The patients receiving famotidine were treated with one of three dose regimens, 40 mg h.s., 40 mg b.i.d., or 20 mg b.i.d. Patients were reassessed by endoscopy at 2, 4, and 8 wk if ulcer healing had not occurred sooner. A diary was kept to record the duration and intensity of the day and night pain and the amount of Gelusil antacid (Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, N.J.) ingested. Three hundred sixty-three patients met the evaluation criteria. The results revealed a 4-wk healing rate of 70%, 75%, 67%, and 31% for the famotidine 40 mg h.s., 40 mg b.i.d., 20 mg b.i.d., and placebo groups, respectively. The 8-wk healing rates for the same respective groups were 83%, 82%, 82%, 45%. Ulcer pain and antacid consumption occurred less often in the famotidine groups. The clinical and laboratory safety profile of the famotidine groups was similar to that of the placebo group. Famotidine appears to be an effective and safe once-a-day therapy for the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer disease. The recommended dosage is 40 mg h.s.     

Cisapride for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study

Objectives : To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cisapride in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Methods : Patients (N = 177) were randomized to double-blind treatment with cisapride (10 or 20 mg q.i.d .) or placebo for 12 wk. Efficacy was determined by pre- and poststudy endoscopies, symptom assessments by patient and physician, and Maalox consumption. Safety evaluations included vital signs, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests, and reports of adverse events. Results : Cisapride 10 ing significantly reduced daytime and nighttime heartburn at 4 wk compared with placebo. Cisapride 20 mg reduced both daytime and nighttime heartburn at 4, 8, and 12 wk, compared with placebo, and was also significantly superior to the 10-mg dose at 12 wk. The percent of patients with endoscopic healing was significantly higher with cisapride 20 mg than with placebo [healing: 51 vs 36% ( p ≤ 0.044)1. Maalox usage declined significantly with cisapride 20 mg compared with placebo. No clinically significant changes in safety variables occurred with cisapride. The most frequently reported adverse events in the cisapride group were diarrhea, headache, and sinusitis. Conclusions : Cisapride 10 and 20 mg q.i.d . were safe and well tolerated in a population of patients with mild-to-moderate gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Both symptoms and endoscopic grade improved after 12 wk of treatment with cisapride 20 mg q.i.d .     

Predicting the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in patients with non-erosive reflux disease before therapy using dual-channel 24-h esophageal pH monitoring

Background and Aim: We aimed to determine whether reflux‐ and symptom‐related parameters can predict the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD). Methods: Twenty‐seven NERD patients who had experienced heartburn more than once a week within the previous month were enrolled. Intraesophageal pH before therapy was measured simultaneously at 5 and 15 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) for 24 h. The PPI rabeprazole was administered at a dose of 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks. In the event that heartburn was not relieved, the dose was increased to 10 mg twice daily for an additional 2 weeks, and again to 20 mg twice daily for another 2 weeks. Results: Univariate analysis demonstrated no significant associations between any reflux‐ or symptom‐related parameters at either site and complete heartburn relief after 4 weeks, or cumulative complete heartburn relief after 8 weeks. However, post‐hoc analysis demonstrated more satisfactory heartburn relief after 4 weeks in patients with a high symptom index compared with those with a low symptom index, at 5 cm above the EGJ (P = 0.009). Cumulative satisfactory heartburn relief after 8 weeks was also greater in patients with a high total number of acid reflux episodes compared with those with a low total number of episodes, at 15 cm above the EGJ (P = 0.037). Conclusions: Pre‐therapeutic pH monitoring in the lower and mid‐esophagus is useful for predicting the efficacy of PPI in NERD patients.     

Esomeprazole 40 mg and 20 mg is efficacious in the long-term management of patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a placebo-controlled trial of on-demand therapy for 6 months

BACKGROUND: On-demand therapy may offer an effective approach to the long-term management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) without oesophagitis. AIM: To examine the efficacy of the novel proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole as on-demand therapy in endoscopy-negative GORD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Endoscopy-negative GORD patients who achieved complete resolution of heartburn after short-term esomeprazole or omeprazole treatment (n = 721) were randomized to esomeprazole 20 mg (n = 282), 40 mg (n = 293) or placebo (n = 146) on demand (maximum one dose/day) for 6 months. The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were time to study discontinuation due to (i) unwillingness to continue and (ii) inadequate control of heartburn, respectively. RESULTS: Both doses of esomeprazole were more effective than placebo. During the 6-month period, 42% of placebo recipients discontinued treatment due to unwillingness to continue, compared with 8% and 11% of esomeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg recipients, respectively. Overall, more patients treated with esomeprazole were free from gastrointestinal symptoms after 6 months of on-demand therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole 20 mg was superior to placebo for on-demand treatment of GORD; a higher dose did not confer additional clinical benefit. Over 90% of patients were willing to continue on-demand treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg over a 6-month period.     

Use of famotidine in adult patients with end-stage renal disease: assessment of dosing and mental status changes

BACKGROUND: Famotidine dosage adjustment is required in patients with chronic kidney disease. Since recommendations on the degree of famotidine dose reduction vary between references, a chart review was conducted to evaluate the tolerability of varying famotidine doses in adults with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: An assessment was made of famotidine doses prescribed to patients with ESRD over a 7-year period in a university hospital. Patient medical records were reviewed for evidence of mental status changes associated with famotidine. RESULTS: In 38 patients who met study criteria, 35 had no evidence of mental status change while receiving famotidine therapy. Among these 35 patients, the mean dose of famotidine was 24 mg/daily for 5.5 days. Three patients had mental status changes possibly associated with famotidine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most ESRD patients seemed to tolerate famotidine 20 mg daily well, but larger prospective studies need to be done before final recommendations can be made. A small percentage of patients may require further dose reduction to minimize risk of mental status change.     

A double-blind, controlled study comparing lafutidine with placebo and famotidine in Japanese patients with mild reflux esophagitis

Purpose  

This randomized, double-blind, controlled study examined whether lafutidine is superior to placebo and non-inferior to famotidine in terms of healing rates as assessed by endoscopy in Japanese patients with mild reflux esophagitis. Safety and improvement in symptoms of heartburn were also assessed.