腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术

探讨腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术的临床应用价值。采用腹腔镜下纤维蛋白封闭剂封闭法修补溃疡穿孔３５例,全部修补成功,无１例术后并发症。腹腔镜溃疡穿孔修补术操作简单可靠,手术创伤小,术后并发症少,不但充分显示了微创手术的优越性,而且集诊断、治疗一体化,尤其适用于非典型的溃疡病穿孔,是目前最适合普及的治疗溃疡病穿孔的腹腔镜手术     

腹腔镜溃疡穿孔修补术联合药物治疗胃、十二指肠溃疡穿孔的体会

目的总结对胃、十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者实施腹腔镜穿孔修补术联合术后药物治疗的体会。方法对32例胃、十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者实施穿孔修补术联合术后规范药物治疗。回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果本组32例患者均成功完成手术,无中转开腹病例。术中及术后经病理学检查结果均排除恶性溃疡穿孔。术中出血量为(59.20±13.18)mL,手术时间为(82.75±30.40)min,术后胃肠功能恢复时间为(31.26±5.22)h,住院时间为(7.30±2.10)d。术后出现2例戳孔感染,1例皮下气肿,均经对症干预后痊愈。未发生出血等其他并发症。术后随访6个月,其间均未发生肠粘连性肠梗阻。末次随访,复查胃镜,溃疡全部愈合。结论腹腔镜胃、十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术创伤小、并发症发生率低、恢复时间短。术后规范药物治疗并保持良好生活习惯,对巩固手术效果、促进溃疡愈合具有重要意义。     

十二指肠溃疡穿孔急诊胃大部切除术的十二指肠残端处理

本就146例十二指肠球部溃疡穿孔急诊毕-Ⅱ式胃大部切除术讨论十二指精残端的处理。残端处理方法：①残端条件较好采用拈膜、笨肌层分层连续缝合，加浆肌层间断缝合；②残留部分溃癌组织时，间断全层缝合，再加浆肌层间断缝合，并覆盖大同膜片；③穿孔不能切球时，缝合穿孔，作清疡旷置式胃大部切除术；④处理遇及困难时切勿顾忌十二指肠置管造瘘术。作认为十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔行急诊胃大部切除术时，应高度重视残端的妥善处理。除结合病人全身情况及腹腔污染程度考虑外，依据穿孔溃疡的病理特点是选择安全有效的处理方法的根本。     

腹腔镜下胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔体会

目的观察比较腹腔镜下胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的临床价值。方法将胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者78例随机分为观察组(39例)和对照组(39例)。对照组患者予以传统开腹修补手术,观察组患者予以腹腔镜下胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术治疗。观察记录两组患者手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间以及术后并发症的发生情况。结果观察组的平均手术时间较对照组有明显增长,但其平均住院时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间均优于对照组。观察组患者术后并发症的发生率明显小于对照组。两者比较,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜下胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔安全有效,值得在临床上推广应用。     

腹腔镜穿孔修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔效果观察

目的探讨腹腔镜穿孔修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的效果。方法选择2015-01—2016-12间在鄢陵县中医院接受穿孔修补术的66例胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者,按照不同手术方法分为2组,各33例。观察组行腹腔镜手术,对照组行开腹手术。比较2组的治疗效果。结果观察组切口长度、手术时间、排气时间、下床活动时间及术后并发症发生率均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜穿孔修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔,创伤小、术后并发症少,有利于患者术后恢复,疗效确切。     

腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术效果观察

目的观察腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术的治疗效果。方法选取2014-02—2015-02间收治的56例胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者,按照不同治疗方法分为2组,每组28例。开腹组实施开腹胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术。腹腔镜组实施腹腔镜下胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术。观察比较2组治疗效果。结果 2组患者均成功完成手术。腹腔镜组患者的手术时间、术后肠蠕动恢复时间均短于开腹组,术后并发症发生率低于开腹组,2组差异均有统计学意义(P005)。结论腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术治疗创伤小,术后并发症低,术后恢复快。     

腹腔镜缝合修补十二指肠溃疡穿孔

目的:探讨腹腔镜缝合修补十二指肠溃疡穿孔的临床应用和手术操作要点。方法:腹腔镜缝合修补十二指肠溃疡穿孔11例,不强调必须沿纵轴缝合,只要操作方便,纵行、斜行、横行缝合均可行。缝合后先覆盖网膜,再打结,不可过紧,以免割裂十二指肠壁,或造成局部肠壁内翻影响术后肠管的通畅性。打结过松时不易固定网膜,不易使网膜紧密压迫穿孔,治疗效果不好。结果:全部病例手术均获成功,无并发症发生。结论:腹腔镜缝合修补十二指肠溃疡穿孔手术创伤小,术后并发症少,集诊断及治疗于一体,显示了微创外科的优越性,是目前适合普及的治疗十二指肠溃疡穿孔的腹腔镜手术方法。     

腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术效果观察

目的分析腹腔镜穿孔修补术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的效果。方法对48例胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者实施腹腔镜穿孔修补术。结果本组无中转开腹病例。手术时间(78.82±12.13)min,术中出血量(36.54±7.42)m L,术后下床活动时间(15.18±4.18)h,住院时间为(8.16±2.08)d。术后均未使用镇痛剂。未发生切口感染、腹腔残余脓肿、粘连性肠梗阻等并发症,患者均痊愈出院。结论对胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者实施腹腔镜穿孔修补术,创伤小、疼痛轻、术后恢复时间短、安全性高。     

腹腔镜穿孔修补术治疗急性胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔

目的总结腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术治疗急性胃、十二指肠溃疡穿孔的临床经验。方法 2005年1月至2010年6月112例急性胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者在本院施行腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术。结果 112例中十二指肠球部溃疡穿孔84例,胃窦部溃疡穿孔28例,穿孔直径0.2～1.2cm,手术时间30～80分钟,手术均获成功,无任何手术并发症。术后患者疼痛轻微,均未使用止痛剂。术后恢复顺利,术后住院5～9天,平均6.5天,切口均甲级愈合,痊愈出院。随访3～36个月,无复发。结论腹腔镜手术治疗急性胃、十二指肠溃疡穿孔,与开腹手术同样安全有效。腹腔镜溃疡穿孔修补术具有创伤小、术中出血少、恢复快、住院时间短、并发症少等优势,应作为首选。腹腔镜下手术困难时应选择开腹手术。     

腹腔镜在消化性溃疡穿孔修补术中的应用

目的探讨腹腔镜修补胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔的疗效及价值。方法回顾性分析30例胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者实施腹腔镜修补术的临床治疗资料。结果 29例顺利完成腹腔镜手术,1例中转开腹;手术时间80~100 min,平均90 min;术后次日可下床活动;术后无需使用镇痛剂;住院天数为7~10天,平均8.5天;术后无并发症发生。结论腹腔镜修补胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔因其具有创伤小、对脏器干扰小、术后并发症少等优点,在严格把握手术适应症的前提下开展腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术是可行的。     

腹腔镜治疗上消化道溃疡穿孔的应用体会

目的:探讨腹腔镜治疗上消化道溃疡穿孔的应用价值及优越性。方法:回顾分析2005年1月至2008年12月我院应用腹腔镜手术治疗上消化道穿孔30例患者的临床资料。结果:30例中胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔28例,胃癌穿孔2例。28例腹腔镜手术成功,2例胃癌穿孔患者中转开腹。手术时间60～80min,平均(68.2±15.5)min。术后住院4～10d,平均6.2d。本组无并发症发生及死亡病例。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗上消化道溃疡穿孔具有患者痛苦小、损伤轻、康复快、并发症少、住院时间短等优点,疗效满意,值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术23例

目的探讨腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术的方法和治疗效果. 方法应用腹腔镜对23例消化性溃疡穿孔(十二指肠穿孔17例,胃窦部前壁穿孔5例,胃体部小弯侧穿孔1例)行穿孔修补﹑腹腔引流术. 结果手术均获成功,无手术并发症.3个月后胃镜复查,13例使用丝线者均有缝线外露,10例使用可吸收外科缝线者无缝线外露.随访6～27个月,平均18个月,3例十二指肠球部穿孔者仍有轻度嗳气,返酸,余无明显症状,无再穿孔. 结论腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术安全可靠,术后继续正规内科治疗,效果满意.     

消化性溃疡穿孔非手术治疗28例报告

目的探讨消化性溃疡穿孔非手术治疗的适应证和治疗方法。方法回顾性分析急性消化性溃疡穿孔非手术治疗28例的临床资料。结果消化性溃疡穿孔治愈27例;1例失败,后采用手术治疗。27例中1例于2个月后作胃癌根治手术。结论选择性非手术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔是一种有效的方法,对消化性溃疡穿孔的治疗有重要的临床意义。     

Comparative study of postoperative complications after open and laparoscopic surgery of the perforated peptic ulcer: Advantages of the laparoscopic approach

BackgroundDespite the acceptance of the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers, its definitive implantation is still a matter of discussion. We performed a comparative study between the open and laparoscopic approach focused on postoperative surgical complications.MethodsRetrospective observational study in which patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcus in our center between 2001 and 2017 were analyzed. Only those in whom suture and/or omentoplasty had been performed were selected, either for open or laparoscopic approach. Demographic, clinical, and intraoperative variables, complications, mortality and length of stay were collected. Both groups, open and laparoscopic surgery patients, were compared.ResultsThe final study sample was 250 patients, 190 (76%) men and 60 (24%) women, mean age 54 years (SD ± 16.7). In 129 cases (52%), the surgical approach was open, and in 121 (48%) it was laparoscopic. Grades III-V complications of the Clavien-Dindo Classification occurred in 23 cases (9%). Operative mortality was 1.2% (3 patients). Laparoscopically operated patients had significantly fewer complications (p = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, laparoscopic approach (p = 0.025; OR:0.45–95%CI: 0.22–0.91), age (p = 0.003; OR:1.03–95%CI: 1.01–1.06), and Boey score (p = 0.024 – OR:1.71 – CI95%: 1.07–2.72), were independent prognostic factors for postoperative surgical complications.ConclusionLaparoscopic surgery should be considered the first-choice approach for patients with perforated peptic ulcer. It is significantly associated with fewer postoperative complications and a shorter hospital stay than the open approach.     

腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术的临床应用

目的:探讨腹腔镜手术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔的可行性。方法:自2006年初,对上消化道溃疡穿孔患者进行前瞻性随机对照研究,按照手术方式分为开腹手术组和腹腔镜手术组,至2010年末,有效病例160例。对比分析两组患者术后疼痛指数、住院时间及术后并发症发生率。结果:腹腔镜组术后疼痛指数、住院时间低于开腹组(P<0.05),两组术后并发症发生率无明显差异,术后随访半年均无复发。结论:腹腔镜上消化道溃疡穿孔修补术是安全有效的微创术式,在一定程度上优于传统开腹手术。     

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗上消化道溃疡穿孔的对照研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜治疗上消化道溃疡穿孔的可行性和效果。方法:回顾分析本院2005年1月至2007年3月24例腹腔镜手术以及36例开腹手术治疗上消化道溃疡穿孔患者的临床资料,并进行对照研究。结果:全部病例均手术成功。腹腔镜组与开腹组的术后使用镇痛药使用率分别为4.2%和41.7%(P<0.01);术后胃肠功能恢复时间平均为29h和62h(P<0.001);平均住院时间为7.3d和9.8d(P<0.01);术后并发症发生率分别为0和16.7%(P<0.05)。两组均治愈出院,术后3个月复查胃镜均未见溃疡复发。结论:经腹腔镜行上消化道溃疡穿孔修补术与传统开腹手术相比,具有疼痛轻,康复快,并发症少等优点,是安全、有效的治疗方法。     

Intraabdominal contamination after gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its complications

Background: Gallbladder perforation often occurs during laporoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: The frequency and causes of gallbladder perforation as well as the relevant clinical background factors were investigated in 110 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We also evaluated intraperitoneal contamination by bacteria and gallstones at the time of gallbladder perforation and investigated whether perforation caused early or late postoperative complications. Results: Intraoperative gallbladder perforation occurred in 29 of the 110 patients (26.3%). It was caused by injury with an electric knife during dissection of the gallbladder bed, injury during gallbladder retraction with grasping forceps, injury during gallbladder extraction from the abdomen, and slippage of cystic duct clips (potentially causing bile and stone spillage). Perforation was more frequent in patients with positive bile cultures and in those with pigment stones (p<0.02), but not in patients with cholecystitis or cystic duct obstruction. The peritoneal cavity was contaminated by bacteria in 11/29 patients (37.9%) and by spilled stones in 3/29 patients (10.3%). There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the patients with and without perforation either in the early postoperative period or during follow-up for 24–42 months. Only one patient developed abdominal pain and fever in the early postoperative period, and they were probably related to perforation. Conclusions: Although gallbladder perforation is sometimes unavoidable during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the risk of severe complications appears to be minimized by early closure of perforation, retrieval of as many of the spilled stones as possible, and intraperitoneal lavage.     

倒刺缝线在腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术中的应用

目的探讨单向倒刺缝线在腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术中应用的安全性及有效性。方法将2014年6月至2016年6月期间60例行腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术的患者分为两组,其中32例采用传统可吸收线缝合为传统缝线组,28例采用倒刺线缝合为倒刺线组,采用SPSS 17.0统计软件分析两组资料,缝合时间、手术时间、术中出血、术后住院时间采用均数±标准差表示,采用t检验;术后并发症计数资料采用χ~2检验;P0.05为差异具有统计学意义。结果所有患者均成功完成手术,无中转开腹,围手术期无并发症发生。两组患者术前一般资料、术中出血、术后住院时间差异均无统计学意义(均P0.05),但倒刺线组缝合时间[(6.4±2.8)min比(41.8±6.5)min]、手术时间[(18.6±4.5)min比(65.8±8.3)min]均明显少于传统缝线组(均P0.05)。60例均获得随访。随访时间3~22个月,平均随访11.5个月。所有患者出院1~3个月返院行胃镜检查,无幽门狭窄、溃疡出血等。结论倒刺缝线在腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术的应用是安全有效,能够缩短缝合时间及手术时间,降低腹腔镜下缝合难度,缩短学习曲线,值得在临床上广泛应用。     

腹腔镜手术治疗老年非典型胃、十二指肠溃疡穿孔的体会

目的:探讨腹腔镜手术治疗老年非典型胃、十二指肠溃疡穿孔的临床意义.方法:回顾分析2010年1月至2019年12月为37例老年非典型胃、十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者行腹腔镜穿孔修补术的临床资料(腹腔镜组),并选择同期41例行开腹穿孔修补术的患者作为对照组(开腹组),对比两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时...