全直肠系膜切除术安全远切端距离的临床研究

目的 探讨全直肠系膜切除术(TME)原则下直肠癌低位前切除术的安全远切端距离.方法 回顾性分析5年间412例TME原则下直肠癌低位前切除术患者的临床资料,比较不同远切端距离(DML)分组间并发症发生率、远处转移率、复发率和生存率的差异.结果 DML＜2 cm组,2～3 cm(含2 cm和3 cm)组,＞3 cm组患者术后并发症发生率和远处转移率差异均无统计学意义(P=0.494和P=0.906).DML＜2 cm组局部复发率(19.30%)显著高于DML2～3 cm组(8.37%,P=0.015)和DML＞3 cm组(7.69%,P=0.029),后两组局部复发率差异无统计学意义(P=0.833).DML＜2 cm组,2～3 cm组,＞3 cm组3年生存率依次为69.4%,86.5%,89.9%;5年生存率依次为63.0%,70.7%,71.1%.DML＜2 cm组总生存率显著低于2～3 cm组和＞3 cm组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.030和P=0.040).DML2～3 cm组和＞3 cm组总生存率之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.707).结论 遵循TME原则下的直肠癌低位前切除术,＜2 cm的远切端距离是不足够的;对于分化较好的直肠腺癌,≥2 cm是可接受的远切端安全距离.     

Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection as an option to combine local treatment of early stage rectal cancer with partial mesorectal lymphadenectomy

Background and aims Low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection with total mesorectal excision are the standard treatment in patients with low rectal cancer. Rectal resection remains a surgical intervention with considerable morbidity and long-term impairment of quality of life. Local excision of low rectal cancer is regarded as an alternative to radical surgery; however, occurrence of lymph node metastasis even in patients with highly differentiated early-stage rectal cancer may be underestimated. Patients and results In two patients with T1 rectal cancer, minimal-invasive partial excision of the mesorectum was performed after transanal excision of the tumor. The postoperative course was uneventful in both patients. Patients left the hospital on the fourth and fifth postoperative day without any complaints. In one patient, histo-pathological workup revealed a lymph node metastasis in the specimen. Discussion The technique of “Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection” represents an interesting option in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer, as it allows for the first time an organ preserving resection of local lymph nodes in the small pelvis. It may evolve as an efficient new staging procedure to identify patients with metastatic disease who may benefit from multimodal treatment or extended surgery.     

腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术

腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术已在临床上受到广泛认可。术中手术层面的识别与游离、盆腔自主神经的保护对于手术成功与否以及患者术后生活质量尤为重要。腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术中需注意：(1)直肠系膜与神经前筋膜之间游离;(2)紧贴直肠系膜游离间隙;(3)保证直肠系膜后方、两侧方和前方的完整;(4)TME手术直肠系膜终止线位于肛门直肠环,游离应到位,不能残留直肠系膜。实践证实,基于膜解剖的直肠癌全系膜切除有助于盆腔自主神经保护以及实现肿瘤的根治性切除。     

Neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum: a 10-year review of management

Neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum constitute approximately 19 per cent of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The histologic characteristics of the tumor seem to be an indicative prognostic factor. Optimal treatment of NETS of the rectum has been widely debated, but more recent studies suggest that treatment depends upon the size. The medical records of 37 patients with NETS of the rectum were retrospectively reviewed. We reviewed their presentation, surgical treatment, pathology, and outcome. All pathological specimens were reviewed. Neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum were classified as either well-differentiated tumors, well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Evaluating tumor size, we found 35/37 patients had tumors less than 1 cm, 1 patient had a tumor between 1 and 2 cm, and one had a tumor greater than 2 cm. Pathologic evaluation of the tumors revealed that 35 of the tumors invaded the submucosa only, one invaded the muscularis propria, and one invaded the perirectal adipose tissue. The histopathologic features of the tumors revealed that 34 of the tumors were well-differentiated NETS with benign features, one tumor had invaded the submucosa, with angioinvasion, and two tumors were neuroendocrine carcinoma. Thirty-five patients underwent local excision. Eleven had reexcisions for positive margins. Two patients had local excision for recurrence, and one patient underwent low anterior resection (4 cm). Twelve patients had negative margins, 25 had positive margins. Eleven patients underwent reexcision. Six had no evidence of residual disease, and five had persistent positive margins and were offered no further treatment. Nineteen patients had positive margins and did not have reexcision. They all had tumors < 1 cm. Despite half of the lesions being resected with final pathologic positive margins, we have seen no significant influence on recurrence or overall survival. This raises the question of margin clearance in early lesions.     

中下段直肠癌直肠系膜转移的研究

目的探讨中下段直肠癌系膜转移与临床病理特征的关系。方法对56例行直肠系膜全切除的中下段直肠癌采用病理大切片法检测直肠系膜转移情况,并分析其与临床病理特征的关系。结果中下段直肠癌直肠系膜转移率为64．3％（36／56）。直肠系膜淋巴结转移率为51．8％（29／56）;直肠系膜癌巢阳性率44．6％（25／56）。直肠系膜转移病灶距肿瘤远端最远有5cm。肿瘤直径35cm中下段直肠癌系膜转移率为83．3％（15／18）,而肿瘤直径＜5cm仅为55．3％（21／38）（P=0．041）。T1、T2和T3期直肠癌直肠系膜转移率分别为1／6、56．6％（13／23）和81．5％（22／27）（P=0．007）。高分化、中分化和低分化直肠癌直肠系膜转移率分别为1／5、63．2％（23／37）和85．7％（12／14）（P=0．028）。I期、Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期直肠癌直肠系膜转移率分别为1／5、27．3％（6／22）和100％（29／29）（P=0．000）。直肠系膜转移率与性别、年龄、肿瘤侵袭肠壁周径、Ming分型无关（P＞0．05）。结论中下段直肠癌直肠系膜转移与肿瘤直径、浸润深度、分化程度和分期密切相关。中下段直肠癌应行直肠系膜全切除或远端直肠系膜切除至少5cm。     

Multimodality management of locally advanced rectal cancer

Despite the routine use of adjuvant chemoradiation for curatively resected stage II and III rectal cancer a significant percentage of patients ultimately fail locally and/or distally; this underscores the need for continued improvement in the efficacy of combined-modality therapy and quality of rectal cancer resection. The recognition of the significance of lateral or circumferential margins of resection has paralleled the widespread use of total mesorectal excision. In addition to facilitating negative margins of resection and local control, sharp mesorectal techniques also facilitate identification and preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves thereby greatly reducing the incidence of urinary and sexual dysfunction following radical resection. Lastly, restorative options can result in excellent bowel function in carefully selected patients undergoing a "very low" anterior resection. Efforts are currently directed at identifying the subset of locally advanced rectal cancer patients who may be adequately treated with a resection alone thereby avoiding the added morbidity of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy.     

Mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum: Report of a rare case and review of the literature

INTRODUCTIONMixed large cell neuroendocrine neoplasms of the rectum are rare and aggressive neoplasms. Survival is poor due to the high rate of lymph node metastases and distant metastases at the time of diagnosis.PRESENTATION OF CASEWe report a case of a 50-year-old male patient with a mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum located 8 cm from the anal verge, treated with low anterior resection and total mesorectal excision with free surgical margins. There were lymph nodes metastases but no distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. The patient refused to receive adjuvant chemotherapy and died 6 months later due to liver failure as a result of multiple hepatic metastases.DISCUSSIONThere are not known predisposing factors for the development of neuroendocrine rectal carcinoma. A neuroendocrine carcinoma of the rectum is a rare tumor with an incidence of less than 0.1% of all colorectal malignancies. The median survival ranges from 5 to 10.4 months in several studies and there are not sufficient data in bibliography about ideal adjuvant therapy after resection of mixed squamous large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the rectum.CONCLUSIONLow anterior resection and total mesorectal excision with free surgical margins in the presence of lymph nodes metastasis is not a sufficient treatment for rectal neuroendocrine carcinoma. More studies should be done in order to determine the ideal adjuvant treatment of these rare and aggressive tumors.     

全直肠系膜切除+经肛门内括约肌切除术治疗超低位直肠癌和直肠肛管癌的近期疗效

目的探讨全直肠系膜切除(TME)+经肛门内括约肌切除术(ISR)治疗超低位直肠癌和直肠肛管癌保肛手术的安全性及可行性,并评价近期肿瘤根治效果及术后肛门功能。方法回顾性分析2009年1月至2010年12月期间四川大学华西医院胃肠外科中心行TME+ISR治疗的超低位直肠癌和直肠肛管癌86例患者的临床及随访资料。结果 86例患者均成功完成手术,肿瘤下缘距肛门1～5 cm(平均1.63 cm);肿瘤直径2～7 cm,平均3.4 cm。肿瘤系高分化4例,中分化60例,低分化22例;pTNM分期为Ⅰ期12例,ⅡA期11例,ⅡB期15例,ⅢA期2例,ⅢB期23例,ⅢC期16例,Ⅳ期7例。术后发生吻合口漏3例,肛周感染2例(其中1例因肛周严重感染引起盆腔、腹膜感染再次手术行永久性造口),吻合口出血及吻合口狭窄各2例,直肠阴道瘘、炎性肠梗阻、尿潴留和腹腔感染各1例。86例患者均获随访,平均随访时间为18个月(12～24个月)。1例于术后7个月发现肝转移,2例分别于术后7个月和12个月因肿瘤广泛浸润、转移死亡;术后1年局部复发3例(3.5%),1年生存率为97.7%(84/86),排便次数1～5次/d,控便功能按Kirwan评分标准可达1～2级。结论 TME+ISR治疗超低位直肠癌和直肠肛管癌是一种可行的、安全的、能达到根治的保肛术式,近期疗效满意。     

Local Recurrence following Total Mesorectal Excision with Double-stapling Anastomosis for Rectal Cancers: Analysis of Risk Factors

This study reviewed the local recurrence rate in patients who had undergone total mesorectal excision and double-stapling low anterior resection for mid and distal rectal cancers. It also aimed to identify risk factors for local recurrence through univariate and multivariate analyses. Consecutive patients with rectal cancers within 12 cm of the anal verge treated with total mesorectal excision and double-stapling low anterior resection from August 1993 to December 2000 were studied. The demographic data, operative details, tumor characteristics, and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Factors that might affect the local recurrence rate were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 270 patients were included in the study (156 men, 114 women). The mean +/- SD age was 64.83 +/- 11.27 years. The mean +/- SD level of the tumor was 7.17 +/- 1.90 cm. All anastomoses were performed within 5 cm of the anal verge. During the mean follow-up of 35.5 months, 12 patients developed local recurrence. The 5-year actuarial local recurrence rate was 7.3%. The presence of lymphovascular invasion and the resection margin of < or = 1 cm were found to be risk factors for local recurrence in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of lymphovascular invasion was the only independent factor for local recurrence. In the group of patients with lymphovascular invasion, proximal tumors (6-12 cm from the anal verge) were shown to have a significantly lower local recurrence than those within 6.1 cm from the anal verge (4.2% vs. 37.8%; p <0.001). Low anterior resection performed with double stapling and total mesorectal excision achieved a local recurrence rate of 7.3%. The presence of lymphovascular invasion was the only independent risk factor for local recurrence. A high local recurrence rate was associated with distal cancers (? 6 cm from the anal verge) with lymphovascular invasion. Adjuvant therapy for local control should be considered for this subgroup of patients.     

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of laparoscopic rectal resection in patients with mid or low rectal cancer was studied prospectively with regard to quality of mesorectal excision, autonomic pelvic nerve preservation and anal sphincter preservation. METHODS: Laparoscopic rectal excision was performed in 32 patients (21 men) with rectal carcinoma located 5 cm from the anal verge. Most patients had T3 disease and received preoperative radiotherapy. The surgical procedure was performed 6 weeks after radiotherapy and included total mesorectal excision, intersphincteric resection, transanal coloanal anastomosis with coloplasty and loop ileostomy. RESULTS: Three patients needed conversion to a laparotomy. Postoperative morbidity occurred in ten patients, related mainly to coloplasty. Macroscopic evaluation showed an intact mesorectal excision in 29 of 32 excised specimens; microscopically, 30 of the 32 resections were R0. Sphincter preservation was achieved in 31 patients. The hypogastric nerves and pelvic plexuses were identified and preserved in 24 of the 32 patients. Sexual function was preserved in ten of 18 evaluable men. CONCLUSION: A laparoscopic approach can be considered in most patients with mid or low rectal cancer.     

Results of long-term follow-up for transanal excision for rectal cancer

Low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection are the surgical techniques used most frequently in the treatment of rectal cancer. It is our hypothesis that selected patients with early T stage, well or moderate grade of differentiation, and small tumor size are good candidates for transanal excision in terms of minimal morbidity, low recurrence rate, and sphincter preservation. From January 1993 until August 2001 30 patients underwent transanal excision; three patients were excluded because they had histology other than adenocarcinoma. Factors analyzed included those related to the patient [age (years), gender, race, body mass index, and anal tone], tumor [size (cm), distance from the anal verge (cm), differentiation, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage], and additional treatment. Median follow-up of the group was 40.7 months (range 0.6-99) and the primary end points were local and distant recurrence. Data are presented as mean (range). The median age of the group was 58.9 years (range 27-94); 52 per cent were female and 48 per cent were male. The mean body mass index was 25.9 (range 22.7-36.7). Preoperatively 81, 11, and 4 per cent of the patients had stage I, II, and III/IV cancer, respectively. Preoperative size of the tumor was 2.0 cm (1-3 cm), and distance from the anal verge was 5.0 cm (3-15 cm). Blood loss was 50 cm3 (5-200 cm3), and there were no operative complications. Tumor differentiation levels were well (37%) and moderate (63%). All patients had negative margins. Additional treatment consisted of radiation therapy in seven patients (six postoperative and one preoperative). Chemotherapy was given to seven patients (six postoperative and one preoperative). The local recurrence rate was 7.4 per cent (two patients), and 3.7 per cent recurred distantly (one patient). Transanal excision of low rectal cancer in selected patients is an acceptable alternative to formal resection. Important selection criteria include early T stage, well or moderate differentiation, relatively small tumor size, and negative microscopic margins. The roles of radiation and chemotherapy remain controversial.     

Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study reviewed the results of surgery for distal rectal cancer (tumours within 6 cm of the anal verge) following the introduction of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in one institution. METHODS: Two hundred and five patients who had undergone surgical resection of rectal cancer within 6 cm of the anal verge were included. The demographic, operative and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Comparisons were made between patients who had different surgical procedures. RESULTS: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in 27.8 per cent of patients, falling from 36.0 per cent in the first 3 years to 20.0 per cent in the last 3 years of the study. The overall operative mortality rate was 1.5 per cent and the morbidity rate 30.2 per cent. With a mean follow-up of 36 months, local recurrence occurred in 28 of the 185 patients who had curative resection. The 5-year actuarial local recurrence rates for double-stapled anastomosis, peranal coloanal anastomosis and APR were 11.2, 34.6 and 23.5 per cent respectively. The local recurrence rate was significantly lower for double-stapled low anterior resection than for the other types of operation. The overall 5-year survival rate in patients with low anterior resection and APR was 69.1 and 51.1 per cent respectively (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: With the practice of total mesorectal excision, APR was necessary in only 27.8 per cent of patients with rectal cancer within 6 cm of the anal verge. The local recurrence rate was much lower in patients with double-stapled low anterior resection than in those treated with APR or peranal anastomosis.     

T3N0 rectal cancer: Results following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy

Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy following resection of T3N0 rectal cancer is recommended in order to reduce the incidence of local recurrence and improve survival. However, recent experience with rectal cancer resection utilizing sharp dissection and total mesorectal excision has resulted in a reduction in local recurrence rates to as low as 5% without adjuvant treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine if rectal cancer resection utilizing sharp mesorectal excision alone is adequate treatment for local control of T3N0 rectal cancer. Between July 1986 and December 1993, 95 patients with T3N0M0 rectal cancer underwent resection with sharp mesorectal excision and did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Various prognostic factors were analyzed for their association with local recurrence and survival. Seventy-nine patients had a low anterior resection, 10 of whom had a coloanal anastomosis, and 16 had an abdominoperineal resection. The median follow-up was 53.3 months. Six patients had local recurrence, 12 had distant recurrence, and three had local and distant recurrences. The overall local recurrence rate was 9% crude and 12% 5-year actuarial. The overall crude recurrence rate was 22%. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 86.6% with an overall survival of 75%. Postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (19%). Five patients (6%) had a documented anastomotic leak. Perioperative mortality was 3%. No technical factors, including type of resection (low anterior vs. abdominoperineal), location of tumor, or extent of resection margin, were significant for determining local recurrence. The only histopathologic marker significant for determining local recurrence was lymphatic invasion (P <0.04). Sharp mesorectal excision with low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection for T3N0M0 rectal cancer results in a local recurrence rate of less than 10% without the use of adjuvant therapy. Therefore, in select patients with T3N0M0 rectal cancer, the standard use of adjuvant therapy for local control may not be justified. Presented at the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of The Society of Surgery for the Alimentary Tract, New Orleans, La., May 17–20, 1998.     

Preoperative radiotherapy improves survival for patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for stage T3 low rectal cancers

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) on patients who undergo rectal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) for stage T3 low rectal cancers. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Evidence for the value of PRT before rectal cancer surgery is weakened by variability in the use of TME. Many surgeons have concluded that PRT is unnecessary for small rectal tumors if TME is performed, but there are no prospective data to support this opinion. METHODS: Since 1980, 2,200 patients with rectal cancer have been enrolled in a prospective database. Of these, 259 underwent curative anterior or abdominoperineal resection with TME for pathologically confirmed T3 lesions within 8 cm of the anal verge. Patients were grouped by receiving PRT (n = 92) or not receiving PRT (n = 167). Five-year overall survival and 5-year local recurrence rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall survival was increased from 52% in patients not receiving PRT to 63% in those receiving PRT. PRT increased overall survival for node-negative patients from 58% to 82%, with no benefit for node-positive patients. There was no significant difference in local recurrence rates. When categorized by tumor size, there was no difference in overall survival or local recurrence for 0- to 2-cm tumors or those larger than 5 cm, but PRT increased overall survival from 50% to 72% for patients with 2- to 5-cm tumors. Similar results were observed for patients with tumors staged as T3 on preoperative endoluminal ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pT3 low rectal cancers undergoing resection with TME have an improved survival with PRT. The effect is most beneficial for patients with node-negative and 2- to 5-cm tumors, although this group may include larger and node-positive tumors that have been downstaged by PRT. PRT should be advocated for all patients with T3 rectal cancers less than 8 cm from the anal verge, even if the surgery includes a properly performed TME.     

Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: To compare a colonic J-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis after low-anterior resection for rectal cancer with regard to functional and surgical outcome. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A complication after restorative rectal surgery with a straight anastomosis is low-anterior resection syndrome with a postoperatively deteriorated anorectal function. The colonic J-reservoir is sometimes used with the purpose of reducing these symptoms. An alternative method is to use a simple side-to-end anastomosis. METHODS: One-hundred patients with rectal cancer undergoing total mesorectal excision and colo-anal anastomosis were randomized to receive either a colonic pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis using the descending colon. Surgical results and complications were recorded. Patients were followed with a functional evaluation at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty patients were randomized to each group. Patient characteristics in both groups were very similar regarding age, gender, tumor level, and Dukes' stages. A large proportion of the patients received short-term preoperative radiotherapy (78%). There was no significant difference in surgical outcome between the 2 techniques with respect to anastomotic height (4 cm), perioperative blood loss (500 ml), hospital stay (11 days), postoperative complications, reoperations or pelvic sepsis rates. Comparing functional results in the 2 study groups, only the ability to evacuate the bowel in <15 minutes at 6 months reached a significant difference in favor of the pouch procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study show that either a colonic J-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis performed on the descending colon in low-anterior resection with total mesorectal excision are methods that can be used with similar expected functional and surgical results.     

Transanal total mesorectal excision achieves equivalent oncologic resection compared to laparoscopic approach,but with functional consequences

BackgroundThis study compared transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (laTME) for the treatment of low rectal cancer. Adequacy of oncologic resection as well as postoperative outcomes were analyzed.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all proctectomy for low rectal cancer by a single surgeon at our institution from January 2014 to September 2019.ResultsThere were 20 taTME and 30 laTME patients. TaTME patients had more distal tumors with no difference in pathologic resection margins or frequency of positive distal margin. Operative times were longer for taTME, but there were no differences in short-term outcomes or complications. TaTME patients had a higher rate of postoperative fecal incontinence.ConclusionTaTME may be a good option for the most distal tumors, when distal margins may be compromised. TaTME provides equivalent oncologic resection, but there is a higher incidence of postoperative fecal incontinence.     

A prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy: implications for sphincter preservation

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to use a comprehensive whole-mount pathologic analysis to characterize microscopic patterns of residual disease, as well as circumferential and distal resection margins, in rectal cancer treated with preoperative CMT; and to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with residual disease. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have shown that preoperative combined modality therapy (CMT) for rectal cancer enhances rates of sphincter preservation. However, the efficacy of preoperative CMT in conjunction with a total mesorectal excision (TME)-based resection, in terms of resection margins using whole-mount sections, has not been reported. Furthermore, since patterns of residual disease and extent of distal spread following preoperative CMT are largely unknown, intraoperative determination of distal rectal transection remains a surgical challenge. METHODS: We prospectively accrued 109 patients with endorectal ultrasound (ERUS)-staged, locally advanced rectal cancer (T2-T4 and/or N1), located a median distance of 7 cm from the anal verge, requiring preoperative CMT, and undergoing a TME-based resection. Comprehensive whole-mount pathologic analysis was performed, with particular emphasis on extent of residual disease, margin status, and intramural tumor extension. Clinicopathologic factors associated with residual disease were identified. RESULTS: A sphincter-preserving resection was feasible in 87 patients (80%), and in all 109 patients, distal margins were negative (median, 2.1 cm; range, 0.4-10 cm). Intramural extension beyond the gross mucosal edge of residual tumor was observed in only 2 patients (1.8%), both < or =0.95 cm. There were no positive circumferential margins (median, 10 mm; range, 1-28 mm), although 6 were less than or equal to 1 mm. On multivariate analysis, residual disease was observed more frequently in distally located tumors (distance from anal verge <5 cm) (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive pathologic analysis suggests that, following preoperative CMT and a TME-based resection, distal margins of 1 cm may provide for complete removal of locally advanced rectal cancer. Although residual cancer following preoperative CMT was more likely in the setting of distally located tumors, occult tumor beneath the mucosal edge was rare and, when present, limited to less than 1 cm. Our results extend the indications for sphincter preservation, as distal resection margins of only 1 cm may be acceptable for rectal cancer treated with preoperative CMT.     

Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: functional assessment and factors affecting outcome

OBJECTIVE: Many patients experience disordered defaecation after low anterior resection of the rectum (LARR). We analysed the anorectal function of these patients to determine which factors might contribute to this problem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2002 and January 2004, 18 consecutive patients (11 males and 7 females) who underwent LARR with total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer were assessed by anorectal manometry, balloon proctometry and the Wexner continence questionnaire before operation and at 6 months and 1 year following stoma closure. Sixteen volunteers (11 males and 5 females) were evaluated for comparison. Stepwise logistic regression was performed for variables that were highly significant at univariate analysis. RESULTS: The mean daily preoperative stool frequency was 2, mean basal pressure (MBP) 43.12 cm H(2)O, maximum threshold volume (MTV) 181.8 ml, length of high-pressure zone (HPZ) 3.11 cm and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was present in all the patients. Twelve months after stoma closure, the stool frequency was 3.3, MBP 37.7 cm H(2)O, MTV 146.3 ml, length of HPZ 2.88 cm and Wexner score 4.37. Comparing patients having a good anorectal function (Wexner score > or = 5) with those having an unsatisfactory function, we found that, on multivariate analysis, the factors that independently contributed to a poor outcome at 12 months after operation were the absence of RAIR as well as an MTV and HPZ below the fifth percentile of normal individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients undergoing LARR with TME for rectal cancer experience an anterior resection syndrome that persists for at least 1 year. Those with no RAIR and subnormal MTV and HPZ lengths can be predicted to have an unsatisfactory outcome.