DVd(T)方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤17例临床疗效分析

目的:观察脂质体阿霉素(PLD)联合长春新碱(VCR)、地塞米松(Dex)士沙利度胺(Thal)治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的疗效及毒副反应.方法:17例初治或复发难治MM患者接受DVd(PLD 40 mg·m-2d1、VCR 2 mg d1、Dex 40 mg d1～4)或DVdT(PLD及VCR用法用量同上,Dex:40 mg,d1～4、d9～12;Thal:100 mg,d1～21)治疗,按照EBMT标准评价疗效、WHO标准判断毒副反应.结果:①17例患者共完成了34个周期的治疗,总有效率(ORR=CR+nCR+VGPR+PR)为58.8%,与国外文献报道接近,与历史上我院采用的VAD及其类似方案相比疗效也接近.②采用DVd方案治疗的11例患者的ORR为4/11(36.4%).其中6例初治患者的ORR为2/6(33.3%).采用DVdT方案化疗的6例患者均为初治病例,其ORR为6/6(100%).对于初治患者.DVdT方案的ORR显著好于DVd方案.③多数治疗相关毒副反应为1～2级且可耐受.17例患者中有13例在接受DVd(T)化疗前心电图或心脏B超示不同程度的心律失常或左室舒张功能降低,但均未因化疗增加心脏毒性.DVd组与DVdT组的毒副反应接近.结论:DVd方案具有较好的耐受性,适当延长Dex用量并加入Thal可以在不增加化疗相关毒性的同时显著提高DVd方案疗效.     

A modified regimen of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVD) is effective and well tolerated for previously untreated multiple myeloma patients

The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), bortezomib and dexamethasone has shown efficacy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our earlier retrospective study suggested that modification of the doses, schedules and route of administration of these drugs appears to reduce toxicity without compromising anti‐MM activity. As a result, we evaluated this modified drug combination in the frontline setting in a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Thirty‐five previously untreated MM patients were enrolled. Dexamethasone IV 40 mg, bortezomib 1 mg/m² and PLD 5 mg/m² were administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 4‐week cycle. Patients were treated to their maximum response plus two additional cycles. The treatment regimen was discontinued after a maximum of eight cycles. Our modified schedule and dosing regimen achieved a high overall response rate of 86%, while showing a marked decrease in the incidence and severity of peripheral neuropathy, palmar‐plantar erythrodysesthesia and myelosuppression compared to the standard dosing on a 3‐week cycle using these drugs. This modified regimen of dexamethasone, bortezomib and PLD shows improved tolerability and safety while maintaining a high response rate when compared to standard treatment with these agents in the frontline setting.     

PAD方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤的疗效研究

目的:观察硼替佐米联合脂质体多柔比星及地塞米松(PAD)方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的疗效和不良反应。方法:初治MM患者19例,其中男11例,女8例,中位年龄66(43～77)岁。均给予PAD方案为一线治疗:硼替佐米1.3mg/m2,静脉注射,第1、4、8、11天;脂质体多柔比星20mg,静脉滴注,第1、4、8天;地塞米松20mg/d,静脉滴注,第1、4、8、11天,每4周为一个周期。采用国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)标准观察疗效,并按国际肿瘤组织毒副作用统一命名法的标准(NCICTCAE)(第3版)判断不良反应。结果:平均(3.9±1.1)(2～6)个疗程后的疗效观察,总有效率为89%,其中完全缓解(CR)8例(42%),非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)2例(11%),部分缓解(PR)6例(31%),轻微反应(MR)1例(5%),疾病稳定(SD)2例(11%)。可见初始疗效的中位时间为2.8(1～5)周,最佳疗效的中位时间为2.7(1～4)个月。骨髓瘤细胞、血清单克隆蛋白量、红细胞沉降率均较治疗前下降。中位随访期19(6～35)个月,所有患者目前均生存。最常见的不良反应为胃肠道症状,其中便秘7例(37%),腹泻1例(5%),恶心2例(11%),黏膜炎1例(5%)。其次为血液学改变,中性粒细胞减少6例(32%),贫血3例(16%),血小板减少5例(26%)。另外,周围神经病变(PN)较为多见,1～2级4例(21%),3级1例(5%)。3例(16%)患者出现手足综合征,3例(16%)患者出现乏力。结论:PAD方案治疗初治MM疗效明确,不良反应较少。     

Thalidomide-dexamethasone plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin vs. thalidomide-dexamethasone: a case-matched study in advanced multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVES: Nearly all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapse or become refractory to front-line therapy. Several salvage therapies have been explored, but the optimal combination regimen has not been defined. We performed a case-matched study comparing patients with relapsed/refractory MM receiving thalidomide-dexamethasone alone or the combination thalidomide-dexamethasone-liposomal pegylated doxorubicin. METHODS: Forty-seven patients received thalidomide (100 mg/d), dexamethasone (40 mg p.o. on days 1-4 and 9-12), and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 28 d) (ThaDD). Their clinical outcome was compared with that of 47 pair mates selected from patients treated at relapse with thalidomide (100 mg/d) and dexamethasone (40 mg p.o. on days 1-4) (Thal-Dex) and matched for age, beta2-microglobulin and previous therapy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Overall response rate was significantly higher in ThaDD group (92% vs. 63.5%; P < 0.0001) as partial response rate (> or =PR) (75.5% vs. 59.5%; P = 0.077), very good partial response rate (> or =VGPR) (36% vs. 15%; P = 0.018) and near complete remission rate (> or =nCR) (30% vs. 10.5%; P = 0.002). Non-hematologic toxicity was similar in the two groups of patients whereas hematologic toxicity and infections were significantly higher in ThaDD patients. Median progression-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival were significantly longer in patients receiving ThaDD than in those treated with Thal-Dex. ThaDD regimen significantly improved response rate and overall survival in comparison with Thal-Dex. Although the frequency of hematologic toxicity and infections resulted higher in ThaDD group compared with control group, they were not particularly frequent after adequate prophylaxis was added and were easily managed when occurred.     

The addition of liposomal doxorubicin to bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone significantly improves clinical outcome of advanced multiple myeloma

Relapsed/refractory myeloma has a poor outcome because of multi-drug resistance, patient low-performance status and toxicity of conventional chemotherapy. To improve results, standard chemotherapeutics and drugs targeting the microenvironment are applied at the same time. Bortezomib, by inhibiting proteasome function, may enhance chemosensitivity to other drugs and overcome drug-resistance. Notably, doxorubicin and bortezomib may reciprocally increase their efficacy. Thus, to improve outcome whilst minimizing therapy-related toxicity, liposomal doxorubicin was added to a bortezomib-based combination. From January 2004, relapsed/refractory myeloma patients referred to our Institution received bortezomib 1·0 mg/m² i.v. twice weekly for 2 weeks in a 28-d cycle for up to six cycles, oral dexamethasone 24 mg with the standard scheduling and thalidomide 100 mg continuously (VTD). From January 2005, liposomal doxorubicin, 50 mg/m² (30 mg/m² for patients older than 75 years), was added on day 4 of each cycle [VTD plus Myocet (MyVTD)]. In total, 70 patients were treated: 28 received VTD and 42 MyVTD. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. Toxicity was manageable although more pronounced with MyVTD. The overall response rate (81% vs. 50%, P  = 0·009), time to progression (19 vs. 11 months, P  = 0·01) and progression-free survival (15 vs. 8 months, P  = 0·001) were significantly higher with MyVTD regimen, suggesting an improved quality of response.     

Safety and efficacy of pomalidomide,dexamethasone and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Immunomodulatory drugs including thalidomide, lenalidomide (LEN) and pomalidomide (POM), are effective for treating multiple myeloma (MM). POM has shown enhanced efficacy with dexamethasone (DEX). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with bortezomib is US Food and Drug Administration‐approved for treating MM. PLD with LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for MM patients. LEN with DEX, PLD and bortezomib achieves high response rates. We evaluated the combination of POM with DEX 40 mg and PLD 5 mg/m² with the latter two drugs administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 on a 28‐day cycle for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM patients. During Phase 1, the maximum tolerated dose of POM was 4 mg, and was used in Phase 2, which also required patients to be refractory to LEN. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed in 10/17 (59%) patients, and the dose was lowered to 3 mg. Median PFS was 5·4 months (range, 0·3–29·0 +  months). Overall response rates for patients in Phase 2 were 39% and 31% among subjects receiving POM at 3 mg and 4 mg, respectively, and clinical benefit rates were 51% and 44%, respectively. POM, PLD and DEX is a treatment option for relapsed/refractory MM patients including those who are refractory to LEN.     

An open‐label phase I/II study of cyclophosphamide,bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin,and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed myeloma

We conducted a phase 1/2 trial evaluating the combination of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (CVDD) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objective of the phase 1 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of maximum planned dose (MPD) and the phase 2 was to assess the overall response rate. Patients received 6–8 cycles of CVDD at four dose levels. There were no dose‐limiting toxicities. The MPD was cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² IV on day 1, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m² IV on day 4, and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on the day of and after bortezomib (21‐d cycle). Forty‐nine patients were treated at the MPD of which 22% had high‐risk myeloma. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities included myelosuppression, infection, and fatigue. Overall response and complete response rates were 91% and 26% in standard‐risk, and 100% and 58% in high‐risk cohort, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 34 months, the median progression‐free survival was 31.3 months. The 2‐yr overall survival was 91.1% in the standard‐risk and 88.9% in the high‐risk cohort, respectively. CVDD regimen was well tolerated and was highly active in newly diagnosed MM.     

Treatment of plasma cell leukemia with vincristine, liposomal doxorubicin and dexamethasone

Primary plasma cell (PCL) leukemia is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by a malignant proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow and peripheral blood. Survival with standard therapy using melphalan is very poor. Doxorubicin encapsulated with liposomes has less cardiotoxicity, is at least as efficient and has fewer side effects than conventional doxorubicin. Two female patients (69 and 54 yr old) with primary PCL are described in this study. They both received a modified form of VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone), a regimen which includes liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 for 1 d), vincristine (2 mg for 1 d) and dexamethasone 40 mg per os on days 1-4, 9-12 and 17-20. A disease evaluation of the first patient after six courses of the modified \VAD regimen showed no plasma cells in the peripheral blood, a decrease in the serum M protein level and a plasma cell infiltration in the bone marrow of less than 5%. The patient died from a cardiac episode 24 months post-diagnosis, while she was in complete hematological remission. The second patient also exhibited good tolerance to liposomal doxorubicin with no side effects, achieved complete haematological remission and remains in good condition 7 months after the last VAD administration. These results suggest that this modified form of VAD regimen also seems to work in PCL and is well tolerated with no side effects.     

PAD combination therapy (PS-341/bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma

Bortezomib (formerly PS-341) has significant activity in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), its efficacy is increased with the addition of dexamethasone and it demonstrates synergy with doxorubicin, thus providing the rationale for combination therapy with bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAD). Patients with untreated MM received four 21-d cycles of PAD, comprising bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, along with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, 8-11 and 15-18 during cycle 1 and days 1-4 during cycles 2-4. During days 1-4, patients also received 0, 4.5 or 9 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin at dose levels 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Following peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection, patients received high-dose melphalan (MEL200) with PBSC transplantation (PBSCT). After PAD induction alone, 20 of 21 patients (95%) achieved at least a partial response (PR), including complete response (CR) in five patients (24%). Twenty of 21 had PBSC mobilized, and 18 of 20 received MEL200/PBSCT. In an intention-to-treat analysis, response rates were: CR 43%, near CR 14%, very good PR 24%, PR 14% and stable disease 5%. PAD was effective, did not prejudice subsequent PBSC collection, and should be further evaluated in prospective randomized trials.     

A steroid-independent regimen of bortezomib, liposomal doxorubicin and thalidomide demonstrate high response rates in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

Novel agents have provided a new foundation for multiple myeloma therapies. When combined with other anti-myeloma agents, these compounds significantly enhance clinical efficacy. High-dose steroids are frequently used in anti-myeloma combination regimens; however, the doses employed are often poorly tolerated, especially in patients with concurrent comorbid conditions. We hypothesized that a steroid-independent combination regimen could be developed without significant compromise of efficacy. The availability of such a regimen will be important for patients whose concurrent ailments make them poor candidates for steroid containing anti-myeloma regimens. A phase II single institute, non-randomized clinical trial was conducted to investigate a novel steroid-free three-drug combination of bortezomib (V), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (D), and thalidomide (T), the VDT regimen. Forty-three newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients requiring treatment were enrolled on this study. The overall response rate and complete response (CR) + near complete response (nCR) rate was 78% and 35%, respectively. Median time to progression was 29·5 months. Fatigue, rash, neuropathy, constipation and infections were the most common side effects. We concluded that VDT is a tolerable and an effective regimen capable of inducing high response rates and can be employed in patients considered to be poor candidates for steroid-based treatment regimens.     

Bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAD) front-line treatment of multiple myeloma: updated results after long-term follow-up

Bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (PAD) was evaluated as induction before stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, using bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) (PAD1, N = 21) or 1.0 mg/m(2) (PAD2, N = 20). Complete/very good partial response rates with PAD1/PAD2 were 62%/42% postinduction and 81%/53% post-transplant. Progression-free survival (29 vs. 24 months), time to re-treatment (36 vs. 29 months) and overall survival (1 year: 100% vs. 95%; 2 years: 95% vs. 73%) were statistically similar but favoured PAD1 versus PAD2. Toxicity was lower in PAD2; bortezomib dose reduction may help manage toxicities while retaining efficacy. PAD is highly active as front-line induction in MM.     

Thalidomide in combination with vincristine, epirubicin and dexamethasone (VED) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma

The present study aimed to evaluate the side-effects and efficacy of thalidomide in combination with an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen in previously untreated myeloma patients. Thalidomide (400 mg/d) was combined with bolus injections of vincristine and epirubicin and oral dexamethasone (VED). Chemotherapy cycles were repeated every 3 wk until no further reduction in myeloma protein was observed, whereas the treatment with thalidomide was continued until disease progression. Thirty-one patients were enrolled, 12 patients were exclusively treated with thalidomide in combination with VED and 19 patients additionally received high-dose melphalan, for consolidation. Adverse events and response to therapy were assessed prior to treatment with high-dose chemotherapy. Response to thalidomide combined with VED was complete remission in six patients (19%), partial remission in 19 patients (61%), stable disease in five patients (16%), and progressive disease in one patient (3.2%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events consisted of leukocytopenia in 10 patients (32%), and thrombocytopenia and anemia in one patient each (3.2%). Neutropenic infections grade 3 and 4 occurred in seven (23%) and three patients (9.7%), respectively, including two patients (6.5%) who died from septic shock. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in eight patients (26%), constipation in 20 patients (65%), and polyneuropathy in 20 patients (65%). The probability of event-free survival and overall survival in the whole group of patients at 36 months were 26 and 62%, respectively. In conclusion, the combination of thalidomide with VED appears to be highly effective in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma, but it is associated with a high rate of thrombotic events, polyneuropathy, and neutropenic infections.     

Extended follow-up of outcome measures in multiple myeloma patients treated on a phase I study with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

A phase I study of a combination of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin showed significant anti-tumor activity against advanced multiple myeloma, with 36% of patients achieving a complete or near-complete response and 73% having a partial response or better. Given this encouraging efficacy, it was therefore of interest to update the prior experience and define parameters such as time to progression, time to retreatment, and overall survival. Additional follow-up was collected on all evaluable multiple myeloma patients and revealed a median time to progression of 9.3 months versus 3.8 months on whatever had been the patient’s prior therapy. Time to retreatment was prolonged from 5.9 months after the patient’s prior therapy to 24.2 months after bortezomib with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The median overall survival after therapy with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was 38.3 months. These findings compare favorably with results reported for bortezomib alone and support the possibility that the bortezomib/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin regimen may provide superior efficacy against relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.     

Bortezomib and thalidomide, a steroid free regimen in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma

Despite their efficacy in myeloma, corticosteroids have acute and chronic toxicities. Newer agents with significant anti-myeloma activity permit the development of steroid-free regimens. We designed a Phase II clinical trial to study the toxicity and efficacy of a steroid-free combination of bortezomib and thalidomide as a first-line treatment in patients with symptomatic myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1·3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 every 21 d and thalidomide 150 mg/d for a maximum of eight cycles. Amongst 27 evaluable patients, the overall response was 81·5% with 25·8% near complete response or greater. The response rate was comparable to most other two drug combinations for upfront therapy but lower than that obtained with the use of three drugs. The most common grade 3 toxicities were peripheral neuropathy (22%), pneumonia (15%), fatigue (7%) and anaemia (7%). Peripheral neuropathy completely resolved in 80% of the patients upon completion of therapy, but not in the remaining 20% of patients. No venous thromboembolic events were observed even in the absence of prophylactic anticoagulation. The median progression-free survival was 16·8 months (95% confidence interval 8·7-21·6 months). Median overall survival has not yet been reached at a median follow up of 39 months. The 3-year overall survival was 74%. This study demonstrates: (i) the efficacy of a steroid-free regimen; (ii) mostly reversible treatment-related peripheral neuropathy; and (iii) the absence of venous thrombotic events.     

Doxorubicin and dexamethasone followed by thalidomide and dexamethasone is an effective well tolerated initial therapy for multiple myeloma

Among the drug combinations designed for the initial treatment of multiple myeloma, none has been unequivocally shown to be superior. However, a regimen leading to a high response rate and a low incidence of adverse events is highly desirable. We report the results of a phase II clinical trial involving 45 patients with Durie-Salmon stage II and III multiple myeloma. Doxorubicin and dexamethasone were given for 2 or 3 months followed by thalidomide and dexamethasone for 2 months (AD-TD regimen) with prophylactic antibiotics and daily aspirin (81 mg/d). Among the 42 patients whose response could be assessed, 38 responded to therapy (90.5%). The intent-to-treat response rate was 84.4% with seven complete responses (CR 15.5%), nine near complete responses (nCR 20.0%), and 22 partial responses (PR 48.9%). Two patients had stable disease (4.4%), and two progression of disease (4.4%). Normalization of the free light chain ratio after one or two cycles of treatment was highly predictive of achievement of CR or nCR. Patients tolerated the treatment well although five patients developed thromboembolic complications (11%). AD-TD administered with low dose aspirin for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis was well tolerated and yielded a high response rate with minimal treatment-related morbidity.     

ThaDD plus high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation does not appear superior to ThaDD plus maintenance in elderly patients with de novo multiple myeloma

Objectives: With the aim to address the issue whether high‐dose therapy (HDT) is required after new drugs combinations to improve outcome of elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, we compared the toxicity and the outcome of ThaDD plus maintenance to those of ThaDD plus HDT‐autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods: Sixty‐two patients not eligible for HDT receiving six courses of ThaDD regimen plus maintenance with thalidomide were compared to 26 patients eligible for HDT treated with four courses of ThaDD followed by melphalan 100–200 mg/m² and ASCT. The two groups were matched for the main characteristics except for age favouring the HDT group. Results and conclusions: Complete remission (CR) obtained with ThaDD plus maintenance was 24% whereas it was 57% after ThaDD plus HDT‐ASCT (P = 0.0232). However, after a median follow‐up of 36 months, median time to progression (TTP) and progression free survival (PFS) of the group of patients undergone HDT were not significantly different to those of patients receiving ThaDD plus maintenance (32 vs. 31 months: P = 0.962; 32 vs. 29 months: P = 0.726, respectively). Five‐year overall survival (OS) was 49% in the first group and 46% in the latter one (P = 0.404). As expected, a significantly higher incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infections, mucositis and alopecia were observed in the ThaDD plus HDT group. Our results suggest that in elderly MM patients ThaDD plus HDT, albeit significantly increases CR rate, seems to be equivalent to ThaDD plus maintenance in terms of TTP, PFS and OS. These results challenge the requirement for HDT consolidation in this subset of patients.     

硼替佐米为主化疗方案治疗初治与复发难治多发性骨髓瘤近期疗效分析

目的:分析硼替佐米为主化疗方案治疗初治与复发难治多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的临床疗效和不良反应.方法:初治MM患者11例,复发、难治MM患者7例均采用VD方案化疗:硼替佐米1.0～1.3 mg/m2第1、4、8和11天快速静脉注射,地塞米松20 mg第1～4天(7例复发难治予地塞米松40 mg)静脉滴注,3周为1疗程,所...     

Long‐term remission in a case of plasmablastic lymphoma treated with COMP (cyclophosphamide,liposomal doxorubicin,vincristine, prednisone) and bortezomib

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare subtype of non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) strongly associated with HIV infection, even if cases in other immunosuppressed patients such as solid organ transplant recipients and in immunocompetent individuals have been increasingly reported. Current treatment strategy for HIV‐negative patients is similar to DLBCL as first‐line treatment, but durable remissions are seldom observed. Anthracycline‐containing regimens could be too toxic for elderly patients and/or with cardiac failure, because a non‐pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NLD) could be used in this field. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor currently approved for patients with multiple myeloma and relapsed mantle‐cell lymphoma, has recently showed clinical activity in PBL patients. Herein, we report a rapid and long‐term remission of a PBL patient with cardiac failure and that had previously received a double kidney transplant, treated front‐line with COMP (with a NLD substituted for doxorubicin) followed by subcutaneous bortezomib consolidation. We suggest first‐line treatment outcome is determinant for PBL patients. Bortezomib has a promising role and should be incorporated in future clinical trials and NLD could represent a suitable option for patients with cardiac failure or high cardiovascular risk.     

A phase 2 study of modified lenalidomide,bortezomib and dexamethasone in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma

We sought a regimen that incorporates optimal novel agents and balances efficacy with toxicity in transplant‐ineligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our study evaluated modified lenalidomide‐bortezomib‐dexamethasone (RVD lite) in this population and was administered over a 35‐day cycle. Lenalidomide 15 mg was given orally on days 1–21; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m² weekly subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally was given on the day of and day after bortezomib for 9 cycles followed by 6 cycles of consolidation with lenalidomide and bortezomib. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR); secondary objectives included safety, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Fifty‐three eligible patients were screened between April 2013 and May 2015; 50 received at least one dose of therapy. Median age at study entry was 73 years (range 65–91). The ORR was 86% and 66% of patients achieved a very good partial response or better. Median PFS was 35·1 months (95% confidence interval 30·9–not reached) and median OS was not reached at a median follow‐up of 30 months. Peripheral neuropathy was reported in 31 (62%) patients with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3 symptoms. RVD lite is a well‐tolerated and highly effective regimen, with robust PFS and OS, in the transplant‐ineligible MM population.