Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in Recipients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection negatively impacts patient and graft survival following nonhepatic solid organ transplantation. Most data, however, are in kidney transplant, where despite modest impact on outcomes, transplantation is recommended for those with mild to moderate hepatic fibrosis given overall benefit compared to remaining on dialysis. In lung transplantation (LuTx), there is little data on outcomes and international guidelines are vague on the criteria under which transplant should be considered. The University of Alberta Lung Transplant Program routinely considers patients with HCV for lung transplant based on criteria extrapolated from the kidney transplant literature. Here we describe the outcomes of 27 HCV‐positive, compared to 443 HCV‐negative LuTx recipients. Prior to transplant, five patients were treated for HCV and cured. At the time of transplant, 14 patients remained HCV RNA positive. The 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year survival were similar in HCV RNA–positive versus ‐negative recipients at 93%, 77%, and 77% versus 86%, 75%, and 66% (p = 0.93), respectively. Long‐term follow‐up in eight patients demonstrated no significant progression of fibrosis. In our cohort, HCV did not impact LuTx outcomes and in the era of interferon‐free HCV therapies this should not be a barrier to LuTx.     

IRS-1 serine phosphorylation and insulin resistance in skeletal muscle from pancreas transplant recipients

Insulin-dependent diabetic recipients of successful pancreas allografts achieve self-regulatory insulin secretion and discontinue exogenous insulin therapy; however, chronic hyperinsulinemia and impaired insulin sensitivity generally develop. To determine whether insulin resistance is accompanied by altered signal transduction, skeletal muscle biopsies were obtained from pancreas-kidney transplant recipients (n = 4), nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients (receiving the same immunosuppressive drugs; n = 5), and healthy subjects (n = 6) before and during a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Basal insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 Ser (312) and Ser (616) phosphorylation, IRS-1-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-1/2 phosphorylation were elevated in pancreas-kidney transplant recipients, coincident with fasting hyperinsulinemia. Basal IRS-1 Ser (312) and Ser (616) phosphorylation was also increased in nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients. Insulin increased phosphorylation of IRS-1 at Ser (312) but not Ser (616) in healthy subjects, with impairments noted in nondiabetic kidney and pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. Insulin action on ERK-1/2 and Akt phosphorylation was impaired in pancreas-kidney transplant recipients and was preserved in nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients. Importantly, insulin stimulation of the Akt substrate AS160 was impaired in nondiabetic kidney and pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. In conclusion, peripheral insulin resistance in pancreas-kidney transplant recipients may arise from a negative feedback regulation of the canonical insulin-signaling cascade from excessive serine phosphorylation of IRS-1, possibly as a consequence of immunosuppressive therapy and hyperinsulinemia.     

Minimal model analysis in nondiabetic renal transplant recipients with hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological data suggest that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may contribute to the development of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM). METHODS: We investigated the glucose metabolism in 19 renal transplant recipients with antiHCV antibodies and without DM according to World Health Organization criteria before or after transplantation. We measured insulin sensitivity (SI), glucose effectiveness (SG), and pancreatic insulin response using the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT). SI and SG were estimated using the Bergman minimal model method and pancreatic insulin response was expressed as the area under insulin curve (AUIC) between 0 and 19 minutes. RESULTS: Impaired glucose tolerance was shown in 42% of patients, some (31.5%) in the range of glucose intolerance (KG: 1-1.5) and others (10.5%) in the diabetes range (KG < 1). SI and SG were decreased in 39% and 63% of patients, respectively. Pancreatic insulin response revealed high variation among patients although showing a tendency to be enhanced. CONCLUSIONS: A high number of HCV-positive renal transplant recipients without clinically manifest PTDM have impaired glucose tolerance, which suggests the future development of diabetes in these patients.     

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level in plasma and kidney tissue in HCV antibody‐positive donors: Quantitative comparison

Kidney transplant from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody has been limited to HCV viremic recipients only, due to concern of the HCV transmission. However, the new antiviral medications provide an opportunity to expand the utilization of these donors. To study the risk of HCV transmission in kidney transplantation, we used discarded donor kidneys and determined HCV RNA levels by quantitative real‐time PCR in bilateral (right and left) kidney biopsies and plasma from 14 HCV antibody‐positive donors (sensitivity: 15 international unit (IU)/mL plasma; 1.8 IU/50 nL kidney). In three NAT‐negative donors, HCV RNA was negative in plasma and kidney. In all 11 NAT‐positive donors, HCV RNA was positive in plasma (range: 5807‐19 134 177 IU/mL) but negative in six kidneys from four donors with plasma HCV RNA <1.5 million IU/μL. HCV RNA correlated between right and left kidneys (P = 0.75) and between kidney and plasma (r = 0.86). When normalized by volume, HCV RNA median (range) was 49 (0‐957) IU/50 nL plasma and 1.0 (0‐103) IU/50 nL kidney, significantly lower in kidney (P = 0.005) than in plasma (14‐fold). Plasma HCV RNA can be used to predict the kidney HCV load. Future studies are needed if plasma/kidney HCV levels can be used to stratify donors for transmission risk and recipients for post‐transplant management in extended utilization of HCV antibody‐positive donors.     

Transplantation of kidneys from hepatitis C‐positive donors into hepatitis C virus‐infected recipients followed by early initiation of direct acting antiviral therapy: a single‐center retrospective study

The availability of direct acting antiviral agents (DAA) has transformed the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The current study is a case series that reports the outcomes from a cohort of twenty‐five HCV‐infected ESRD patients who received a kidney from an anti‐HCV‐positive deceased organ donor followed by treatment with DAAs in the early post‐transplant period. Time to transplantation and the efficacy of DAA therapy as measured by sustained viral response at 12 weeks were assessed. The median waiting time from original date of activation on the United Network Organ Sharing (UNOS) waiting list until transplantation was 427 days; however, the median time from entering the patient into UNet^sm for a HCV‐positive offer until transplantation was only 58 days. The 25 patients were started on antiviral treatment early post‐transplant (median 125 days) and 24 of 25 (96%) achieved a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks. Tacrolimus dose adjustments were required during antiviral treatment in 13 patients to maintain therapeutic levels. Accepting a kidney from an anti‐HCV‐positive deceased donor shortened the waiting time for HCV‐infected kidney transplant candidates. We recommend that kidneys from anti‐HCV‐positive donors should be considered for transplant into HCV‐infected recipients followed by early post‐transplant treatment with DAA agents.     

Use of HCV Ab+/NAT− donors in HCV naïve renal transplant recipients to expand the kidney donor pool

Hepatitis C (HCV) disease transmission from the use of HCV antibody‐positive and HCV nucleic acid test‐negative (HCV Ab+/NAT?) kidneys have been anecdotally reported to be absent. We prospectively analyzed kidney transplant (KT) outcomes from HCV Ab+/NAT? donors to HCV naïve recipients under T‐cell depleting early steroid withdrawal immunosuppression. Allografts from 40 HCV Ab+/NAT? donors were transplanted to 52 HCV Ab? recipients between July 2016 and February 2018. Thirty‐three (82.5%) of donors met Public Health Service (PHS) increased risk criteria. De novo HCV infection was detected at 3 months post‐KT in one recipient (1.9%). This was a case of transmission from a HCV Ab+ NAT+ donor with an initial false‐negative NAT completed using sample collected on donor hospital admission (day 2). At the time of HCV diagnosis, a stored donor sample collected during procurement (day 4) was tested and resulted NAT‐positive. Subsequently, sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved with 12 weeks of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. One death with functioning graft at 261 days post‐KT was determined not related to HCV or donor factors. This experience provides evidence of a low transmission rate of HCV from HCV Ab+/ NAT? kidney donors, thereby arguing for increasing utilization.     

Identification of Optimal Donor–Recipient Combinations Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)–Positive Kidney Transplant Recipients

For some patient subgroups, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been associated with worse outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT); potentially modifiable factors may be responsible. The study goal was to identify factors that predict a higher risk of graft loss among HIV‐positive KT recipients compared with a similar transplant among HIV‐negative recipients. In this study, 82 762 deceased donor KT recipients (HIV positive: 526; HIV negative: 82 236) reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) (2001–2013) were studied by interaction term analysis. Compared to HIV‐negative recipients, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) amplified risk 2.72‐fold among HIV‐positive KT recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.75–4.22, p < 0.001). Forty‐three percent of the excess risk was attributable to the interaction between HIV and HCV (attributable proportion of risk due to the interaction [AP]: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.23–0.63, p = 0.02). Among HIV‐positive recipients with more than three HLA mismatches (MMs), risk was amplified 1.80‐fold compared to HIV‐negative (aHR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.31–2.47, p < 0.001); 42% of the excess risk was attributable to the interaction between HIV and more than three HLA MMs (AP: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24–0.60, p = 0.01). High‐HIV‐risk (HIV‐positive/HCV‐positive HLAwith more than three MMs) recipients had a 3.86‐fold increased risk compared to low‐HIV‐risk (HIV‐positive/HCV‐negative HLA with three or fewer MMs)) recipients (aHR: 3.86, 95% CI: 2.37–6.30, p < 0.001). Avoidance of more than three HLA MMs in HIV‐positive KT recipients, particularly among coinfected patients, may mitigate the increased risk of graft loss associated with HIV infection.     

Risks,benefits, and ethical questions associated with transplanting kidneys from hepatitis C virus‐infected donors into hepatitis C virus‐negative patients

Utilization of kidneys from hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected deceased donors has the potential to increase the number of kidney transplants by 500‐1000 (or more) each year. This increase in the number of kidney transplants offers major opportunities to extend survival and improve quality of life for patients infected with HCV, as well as uninfected recipients. However, due to a lack of prospective safety and efficacy data on a sufficient number of HCV‐negative recipients who received a kidney from a HCV‐infected donor, as well as key logistical barriers, the practice of transplanting HCV‐infected organs into uninfected recipients is not yet ready to be considered as standard of care. Ongoing research coupled with a collaboration between insurers and transplant centers might bring positive‐into‐negative transplant into the realm of standard of care in well‐informed transplant candidates, regardless of HCV status.     

Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hepatitis C Virus From an Organ Donor to Four Transplant Recipients

In 2007, a previously uninfected kidney transplant recipient tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Clinical information of the organ donor and the recipients was collected by medical record review. Sera from recipients and donor were tested for serologic and nucleic acid‐based markers of HIV and HCV infection, and isolates were compared for genetic relatedness. Routine donor serologic screening for HIV and HCV infection was negative; the donor's only known risk factor for HIV was having sex with another man. Four organs (two kidneys, liver and heart) were transplanted to four recipients. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) of donor sera and posttransplant sera from all recipients were positive for HIV and HCV. HIV nucleotide sequences were indistinguishable between the donor and four recipients, and HCV subgenomic sequences clustered closely together. Two patients subsequently died and the transplanted organs failed in the other two patients. This is the first recognized cotransmission of HIV and HCV from an organ donor to transplant recipients. Routine posttransplant HIV and HCV serological testing and NAT of recipients of organs from donors with suspected risk factors should be considered as routine practice.     

Insulin resistance is a common denominator of post-transplant diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in renal transplant recipients

Background. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus is a known complication of steroid therapy in renal transplant recipients. Both insulin resistance and insulin deficiency have been shown to be necessary for development of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. It is not known whether recipients with impaired glucose tolerance have similar degree of insulin resistance or deficient insulin response as recipients with post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Methods. To address this question, we used an oral glucose tolerance test to categorize 46 renal transplant recipients on triple immunosuppressive medication to groups with normal glucose tolerance, impaired glucose tolerance or post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Insulin sensitivity was measured using a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. Insulin response was calculated from the increase in serum insulin concentration during the oral glucose tolerance test. Results. Twenty-five were categorized to normal glucose tolerance, 15 to impaired glucose tolerance and six to post-transplant diabetes mellitus. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding prednisolone dose, azathiprine dose, use of {beta}-blocker, age, gender, weight, waist-hip ratio, body mass index, donor source, smoking habits, or first-degree relatives with histories of diabetes mellitus. The impaired glucose tolerance and post-transplant diabetes mellitus groups showed a significant reduction in insulin-stimulated glucose disposal rate (mg/kg^.min) compared to the normal glucose tolerance group (4.6±1.6 and 3.4±1.3 respectively vs 7.1±2.4, P<0.05). The insulin response (picomol/l) was not different between the normal glucose tolerance and impaired glucose tolerance groups but was significantly reduced in the post-transplant diabetes mellitus group (448±310 and 450±291 respectively vs 170±128, P<0.05).Conclusion. Insulin resistance is a common denominator of post-transplant diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in renal transplant recipients.     

Renal transplantation from seropositive hepatitis C virus donors to seronegative recipients in Spain: a prospective study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive donors are identified in Spain by antibody detection (HCV‐Ab) techniques while a HCV nuclear acid‐testing (HCV‐NAT) is not mandatory. Since it has been shown that HCV‐Ab positive HCV‐NAT negative donors do not universally transmit the infection, we designed a protocol based on the identification of viremia in HCV‐Ab positive donors to start treatment if needed. HCV‐Ab‐positive donors were identified and we performed HCV‐NAT immediately. Donors coinfected with HIV were excluded. Recipients with a low chance to receive a transplant, with no history of liver disease and who were negative for HCV‐Ab were selected after informed consent was signed. Kidney recipients from HCV‐NAT‐positive donors received glecaprevir and pibrentasvir from 6 h before the transplant until 8 weeks after. Recipients from HCV‐NAT‐negative donors were not treated. Regular monitoring by HCV‐NAT was performed to initiate antiviral treatment. We included 11 recipients from six deceased donors Four recipients received grafts from HCV‐NAT‐positive donors and seven patients received grafts from HCV‐NAT‐negative donors. None of our recipients exhibited HCV‐NAT positivity during the minimum follow‐up period of 6 months. Recipients from HCV‐NAT‐positive donors exhibited sustained virologic response at 12 weeks. One recipient from an HCV‐NAT‐negative donor lost his graft via a process thought to be unrelated to HCV. The remaining 10 patients had a stable functioning graft at the end of the follow‐up period. Our preliminary data suggest that renal transplantation from HCV‐Ab‐ positive donors to HCV‐Ab negative recipients is safe when only the recipients of organs from HCV‐NAT‐positive donors are treated.     

A prospective multicenter observational study of cell‐mediated immunity as a predictor for cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients

T cell immunity is essential for the control of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after transplantation. We evaluated a CMV‐specific peptide‐based enzyme‐linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay to determine whether assay results could predict subsequent CMV events. Adult kidney transplant recipients at 43 centers underwent ELISPOT testing to enumerate interferon gamma (IFN‐γ) binding spot‐forming units (sfu) after stimulation of cells with an overlapping peptide pool of CMV phosphoprotein 65 (pp65) and immediate early‐1 (IE‐1) protein at the end of antiviral prophylaxis (EOP) and various time points thereafter. The primary outcome was a CMV event in the first posttransplant year. In 583 kidney transplant recipients (260 seropositive donor [D+]/seronegative recipient [R?] and 277 R+), CMV events occurred in 44 of 368 eligible patients (11.8%) at a median of 227 days (range 92‐360) posttransplant. A cutoff value of >40 sfu/2.5 × 10⁵ cells for either IE‐1 or pp65 was derived as a threshold for positivity, with a negative predictive value of >97% for CMV events. CMV events were significantly lower in assay positive vs assay negative patients (3.0% vs 19.5%, P < .0001 for pp65). Time to CMV event post‐EOP was significantly greater in those with sfu >40 at EOP (P < .0001). In this large, multicenter trial of kidney transplant recipients, we show that an assessment of CMV‐specific immunity using a novel ELISPOT assay is able to predict protection from CMV infection.     

HCV感染与肾移植后糖尿病关系的荟萃分析

目的应用荟萃分析系统评价HCV感染是否为肾移植后糖尿病(PTDM)的相关危险因素。 方法系统检索中国期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学数据库、PubMed数据库、Embase数据库、Google scholar和Web of science database截至2019年12月公开发表的相关文献。应用Stata 15.1统计软件使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,计算相对危险度(RR)。 结果共纳入22篇文献,包含129 981例肾移植受者。荟萃分析结果显示,HCV感染的肾移植受者术后发生PTDM的风险为非HCV感染者的2.5倍(RR＝2.50, 95%CI: 1.95～3.20, P<0.001)。在亚洲、高加索和美洲人种中,HCV感染均为肾移植术后PTDM的危险因素。 结论HCV感染是促进肾移植术后发生PTDM的危险因素,感染者需尽早进行清除HCV的相关治疗。     

Emerging Issues in Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health care issue in liver and kidney transplantation. Besides negatively affecting both patient and graft survival, HCV is associated with a heightened risk for new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). The mechanisms underlying the diabetogenicity of HCV are complex but are likely to involve insulin resistance caused by inhibitory actions of the virus on insulin regulatory pathways in the liver. The resultant glucose dysregulation is an important determinant of increased morbidity and mortality in liver and kidney recipients. This review highlights the concerns for outcomes in HCV-positive liver and kidney transplant patients with particular focus on the interrelationship between hepatitis C and diabetes. Data about the potential role of calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil in HCV infection and HCV-associated NODM will also be discussed.     

OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Hepatitis C

Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) have fundamentally changed the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and reduced the discard rate of HCV‐infected organs by offering a treatment option with a high likelihood of cure posttransplant. This has spurred increased interest in transplanting organs from HCV‐positive donors into recipients both with and without HCV. In this chapter, we examine data from 2007 to 2018 to determine trends in HCV (+) donor transplants across various organ types. Since 2015, willingness to accept HCV (+) organs increased for candidates waitlisted for kidney, lung, heart, and pancreas transplant, but decreased for those listed for intestine transplant. For candidates listed for liver transplant, willingness to accept HCV (+) organs decreased from 2007 to 2017, but began increasing in 2017. Willingness to accept was not concentrated in a single US geographic area, and there was substantial variation among transplant programs and donation service areas. Numbers of anti‐HCV (+) donor kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplants have increased considerably in the past few years. Short‐term allograft survival for kidney and liver transplant recipients of anti‐HCV (+) organs appears to be comparable to that for recipients of anti‐HCV (‐) organs in an unadjusted analysis. However, an unadjusted analysis indicates that long‐term allograft survival may be worse. Kidney transplant between HCV‐infected donors and uninfected recipients with posttransplant DAA treatment is an emerging area. Short‐term data are promising, with similar 1‐year allograft survival compared with HCV‐uninfected donor to HCV‐uninfected recipient kidney transplants in unadjusted analyses. However, long‐term data are lacking and close monitoring in the future is warranted.     

Immediate administration of antiviral therapy after transplantation of hepatitis C‐infected livers into uninfected recipients: Implications for therapeutic planning

The practice of transplanting hepatitis C (HCV)‐infected livers into HCV‐uninfected recipients has not previously been recommended in transplant guidelines, in part because of concerns over uncontrolled HCV infection of the allograft. Direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) provide an opportunity to treat donor‐derived HCV‐infection and should be administered early in the posttransplant period. However, evidence on the safety and efficacy of an immediate DAA treatment approach, including how to manage logistical barriers surrounding timely DAA procurement, are required prior to broader use of HCV‐positive donor organs. We report the results of a trial in which 14 HCV‐negative patients underwent successful liver transplantation from HCV‐positive donors. Nine patients received viremic (nucleic acid testing [NAT]‐positive) livers and started a 12‐week course of oral glecaprevir‐pibrentasvir within 5 days of transplant. Five patients received livers from HCV antibody‐positive nonviremic donors and were followed using a reactive approach. Survival in NAT‐positive recipients is 100% at a median follow‐up of 46 weeks. An immediate treatment approach for HCV NAT‐positive liver transplantation into uninfected recipients is safe and efficacious. Securing payer approval for DAAs early in the posttransplant course could enable need‐based allocation of HCV‐positive donor organs irrespective of candidate HCV status, while averting chronic HCV allograft infection.     

Early emergence of anti‐HCV antibody implicates donor origin in recipients of an HCV‐infected organ

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) seroconversion among HCV‐uninfected transplant recipients from HCV‐infected (NAT+/Antibody+) or HCV‐exposed (NAT?/Antibody+) donors has been reported. However, the origin of anti‐HCV antibody and the implications of seroconversion remain unknown. We longitudinally tested plasma from HCV‐uninfected kidney (n = 31) or heart transplant recipients (n = 9) of an HCV NAT+ organ for anti‐HCV antibody (both IgG and IgM isotypes). Almost half of all participants had detectable anti‐HCV antibody at any point during follow‐up. The majority of antibody‐positive individuals became positive within 1‐3 days of transplantation, and 6 recipients had detectable antibody on the first day posttransplant. Notably, all anti‐HCV antibody was IgG, even in samples collected posttransplant day 1. Late seroconversion was uncommon (≈20%‐25% of antibody+ recipients). Early antibody persisted over 30 days in kidney recipients, whereas early antibody dropped below detection in 50% of heart recipients within 2 weeks after transplant. Anti‐HCV antibody is common in HCV‐uninfected recipients of an HCV NAT+ organ. The IgG isotype of this antibody and the kinetics of its appearance and durability suggest that anti‐HCV antibody is donor derived and is likely produced by a cellular source. Our data suggest that transfer of donor humoral immunity to a recipient may be much more common than previously appreciated.     

Natural killer cell function predicts severe infection in kidney transplant recipients

The aim of this study was to determine if natural killer cell number (CD3^?/CD16^±/CD56^±) and cytotoxic killing function predicts severity and frequency of infection in kidney transplant recipients. A cohort of 168 kidney transplant recipients with stable graft function underwent assessment of natural killer cell number and functional killing capacity immediately prior to entry into this prospective study. Participants were followed for 2 years for development of severe infection, defined as hospitalization for infection. Area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves were used to evaluate the accuracy of natural killer cell number and function for predicting severe infection. Adjusted odds ratios were determined by logistic regression. Fifty‐nine kidney transplant recipients (35%) developed severe infection and 7 (4%) died. Natural killer cell function was a better predictor of severe infection than natural killer cell number: AUROC 0.84 and 0.75, respectively (P = .018). Logistic regression demonstrated that after adjustment for age, transplant function, transplant duration, mycophenolate use, and increasing natural killer function (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74‐0.90; P < .0001) but not natural killer number (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93‐1.00; P = .051) remained significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of severe infection. Natural killer cell function predicts severe infection in kidney transplant recipients.     

Transplantation of kidneys from hepatitis C–infected donors to hepatitis C–negative recipients: Single center experience

Our aim was to evaluate the safety of transplanting kidneys from HCV‐infected donors in HCV‐uninfected recipients. Data collected from 53 recipients in a single center, observational study included donor and recipient characteristics, liver and kidney graft function, new infections and de novo donor‐specific antibodies and renal histology. Treatment with a direct‐acting antiviral regimen was initiated when HCV RNA was detected. The mean ± SD age of recipients was 53 ± 11 years, 34% were female, 19% and 79% of recipients were white and African American, respectively. The median and interquartile range (IQR) time between transplant and treatment initiation was 76 (IQR: 68‐88) days. All 53 recipients became viremic (genotype: 1a [N = 34], 1b [N = 1], 2 [N = 3], and 3 [N = 15]). The majority (81%) of recipients did not experience clinically significant increases (>3 times higher than upper limit of the normal value) in aminotransferase levels and their HCV RNA levels were in the 5 to 6 log range. One patient developed fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis with complete resolution. All recipients completed antiviral treatment and 100% were HCV RNA–negative and achieved 12‐week sustained virologic response. The estimated GFRs at end of treatment and 12‐week posttreatment were 67 ± 21 mL/min/1.73 m² and 67 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. Four recipients developed acute rejection. Kidney transplantation from HCV‐infected donors to HCV‐negative recipients should be considered in all eligible patients.     

Sustained response with negative serum HCV-mRNA and disappearance of antibodies after interferon-alpha therapy in a kidney transplant recipient with chronic active viral hepatitis C

BACKGROUND: The use of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) to treat viral hepatitis C (HCV) occurring in kidney transplant recipients is controversial. This study reports an HCV patient successfully treated with IFN-alpha therapy achieving sustained response, negative serum HCV-mRNA and the disappearance of HCV antibodies, without impairment of renal function. METHOD: A young kidney transplant recipient developed a proven HCV infection 70 months post-transplantation. The patient received IFN-alpha therapy, and for a 32-month follow-up period was evaluated clinically, serologically and virologically. RESULTS: IFN-alpha therapy resulted in normal transaminase activities within 2 months. Serum HCV-mRNA was negative after 4 weeks of treatment and is still negative. Ten months after IFN-alpha therapy withdrawal, the enzyme immunoassay revealed that HCV antibodies (HCVAb) were absent in the serum. IFN-alpha therapy was safe, well tolerated and renal function was not impaired.