Triggering Pulmonary Veins: A Paradoxical Predictor for Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After PV Isolation

Triggering Pulmonary Veins and Recurrence After Ablation . Purpose: To identify procedural parameters predicting recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after a first circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI). Methods: One hundred seventy‐one patients undergoing CARTO‐guided CPVI for recurrent AF with a left atrial (LA) diameter <45 mm were studied. Follow‐up (symptoms and 7‐day Holter) was performed at 1 and 3 months and every 3 months thereafter. Clinical and procedural characteristics between successful patients and patients undergoing repeat ablation were compared. In addition, procedural parameters of the first procedure were compared with parameters during repeat ablation. Results: After first CPVI, 80% of patients were free of AF without antiarrhythmic drugs after a follow‐up (FU) of 28 ± 11 months (N = 136). Thirty‐five patients (20%) had recurrence of AF of which 25 underwent repeat ablation (N = 25). Clinical characteristics did not differ between the successful and repeat group. A triggering vein during the index procedure was significantly more observed in the repeat group (56% vs 11%, P < 0.001). At repeat ablation, 2.6 ± 1.2 veins per patient were reconnected. Whereas there was no preferential reconnecting PV, all PVs triggering at index were reconnected (100%). Conclusions: (1) In patients with symptomatic recurrent AF, the presence of a triggering pulmonary vein during ablation is a paradoxical predictor for AF recurrence after PV isolation. (2) The consistent finding of reconnection of the triggering PV at repeat ablation, suggests that, in these patients, the triggering PV is the culprit vein and that reconnection invariably results in clinical AF recurrence. (3) The present study advocates a strategy of even more stringent PV isolation in case of a triggering PV. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 381–388, April 2010)     

Comparison of Cooled-Tip Versus 4-mm-Tip Catheter in the Efficacy of Acute Ablative Tissue Injury During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Introduction: Although several studies have reported the benefits of cooled-tip ablation for circumferential pulmonary veins isolation (CPVI), the acute change of substrate property and acute PV reconnection have not been well demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the cooled-tip with regular 4-mm-tip catheter in acute substrate change after CPVI and long-term efficacy.
Methods and Results: One hundred and fifty-six patients (115 males, age 53 ± 12 years) who underwent CPVI for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. Group A consisted of 52 patients with cooled-tip ablation, and group B consisted of 104 patients with 4-mm-tip catheter ablation. The bipolar voltage of circumferential lesions was obtained using a 3-dimensional (3D) mapping system (NavX) before and after CPVI. The electrical reconnections of 4 PVs were evaluated 30 minutes after CPVI using a circular catheter. Cooled-tip catheter caused more reduction of the electrical voltage in PV antrum, lower incidence of acute PV reconnection, inducibility of AF, and gap-related atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT). Less number of left atrial (LA) ablation line and ablation applications and less procedure time were found in cooled-tip group compared to 4-mm-tip group. No significant difference in the incidence of pain sensation and complication was observed between the 2 groups. At a 14-month follow-up, the recurrence rate in the cooled-tip group was lower than in the 4-mm group (13.5% vs 33.7%, P = 0.009).
Conclusion: Cooled-tip catheter has a superior long-term outcome than the 4-mm-tip catheter in CPVI, which may be associated with the efficacy of transmural block and electrical isolation in PV antrum.     

Utility of exit block for identifying electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins

INTRODUCTION: Electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has been described using "entry block" as an endpoint for PV isolation. We describe a new technique for guiding PV isolation, using "exit block" out of the PV after ablation as a criterion for successful isolation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A circular mapping catheter was positioned at the os of arrhythmogenic PVs and ablation was performed proximal to the mapping catheter until entry block into the vein was achieved. Pacing was performed from the mapping catheter and from the ablator inside the PV to document exit block out of the PV. In patients in whom cardioversion did not restore sinus rhythm, PV isolation was performed in AF. Entry and exit block were reassessed in ablated veins after a 20-minute waiting period. Ninety-five PVs were ablated in 41 patients. A total of 66 PVs in 34 patients were ablated in sinus rhythm. After entry block was achieved, exit block was present in only 38 (58%) of 66 PVs. A total of 29 PVs in 21 patients were ablated in AF. After cardioversion to sinus rhythm, there was evidence of entry block into the PV in 20 (69%) of 29 PVs and exit block in only 14 (48%) of 29 PVs. There was no significant difference between the total number of lesions applied per vein in sinus rhythm compared with AF (11.6 +/- 8.6 vs 10.3 +/- 6.2; P = NS). There was recovery of conduction after a 20-minute waiting period in 9 (11%) of 84 PVs. CONCLUSION: Identification of exit block after ostial PV ablation provides a clear endpoint for electrical isolation of the PVs. Isolation of the PVs can be performed during sustained AF without the need to apply excess RF lesions. Applying a 20-minute waiting period after electrical isolation will identify reconnection in approximately 10% of PVs.     

Incidence and time course of early recovery of pulmonary vein conduction after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Background: Although it is well recognized that recovery of pulmonary vein (PV) conduction is common among patients who fail atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, little is known about the precise time course of recurrence.
Objective: To determine the incidence and time course of early recurrence of conduction after PV isolation during AF ablation.
Methods: The patient population was composed of 14 consecutive patients (9 men [64%]; age 56 ± 7 years) with AF who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation via circumferential ablation with PV isolation, determined by a circular mapping catheter. After successful isolation of the PVs, repeat circular electrode recordings from each PV were obtained at 30 and 60 minutes.
Results: After complete isolation of all PVs, early PV recurrence was observed in 13 (93%) patients and 26 veins (50%). Seventeen veins (33%) showed a first recurrence at 30 minutes, while nine veins (17%) showed a first recurrence at 60 minutes.
Conclusion: The results reveal an extremely high rate of early recurrence of PV conduction following AF ablation. It is particularly notable that about one-fifth of the veins remained isolated at 30 minutes, but subsequently developed recurrence between 30 and 60 minutes. Of the veins that showed early recurrence, one-third developed a first recurrence at 60 minutes. These findings suggest that AF ablation procedures should incorporate a 60-minute waiting period after initial isolation in order to detect early recurrence of conduction.     

Ablation of superior pulmonary veins compared to ablation of all four pulmonary veins:

INTRODUCTION: Isolation of all pulmonary veins (PV) is advocated for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, the superior PVs are responsible for most AF triggers, whereas the inferior PVs carry the higher risk for ablation-induced ostial stenosis. The aim of this study was to compare a superior PV isolation approach with isolation of all PVs for treatment of PAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with PAF were randomized to either left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) isolation followed by additional isolation of the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) in case of AF recurrence (group A, n = 27) or isolation of all four PVs followed by a repeat procedure in case of recurrence (group B, n = 25). At 1-year follow-up, 11 patients (41%) in group A and 8 patients (32%) in group B had AF relapse (P = 0.55). No significant differences in AF relapse were detected between groups at 3 and 12 months (log rank = 0.36, P = 0.54) and by Cox proportional hazards model analysis (P = 0.62). Nonsignificant PV stenosis was detected in two patients from group B. Total radiofrequency energy delivery and fluoroscopy and procedure times were lower in group A: 8.9 +/- 1.4 minutes vs 25.6 +/- 3.7 minutes (P < 0.001), 22.2 +/- 6.8 minutes vs 62 +/- 10.3 minutes (P < 0.001), and 131.8 +/- 26.5 minutes vs 222.2 +/- 32.3 minutes (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: A staged superior PVs isolation approach confers equal success rates but with reduced radiofrequency energy delivery and fluoroscopy and procedure times compared to isolation of all PVs at the initial ablation attempt.     

Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation

Purpose

Arrhythmia recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) occurs predominantly due to the reconnection of previously isolated pulmonary veins (PVs). The prognostic implications of detection and treatment of acute PV reconnection are not well understood. We aim to examine the prognostic significance of acute PV reconnection on arrhythmia recurrence at 1 year following PVI.

Methods

This prospective study included 44 patients (22 men, 60?±?7 years) who underwent index PVI procedure for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Acute PV reconnection and/or dormant PV conduction were assessed sequentially in response to a 30-min waiting period, intravenous isoproterenol infusion and/or adenosine. All cases of acute PV reconnection and/or dormant conduction were successfully targeted with additional ablation.

Results

Freedom from AF at 1 year was 75 % (83.3 % in paroxysmal and 65 % in persistent AF, p?=?ns). Acute PV reconnection and/or dormant conduction were evident in 16 of 44 patients (36.3 %). AF recurrence was documented in eight of 16 patients with, but only in three of 28 patients without acute reconnection (p?=?0.009). Three patients underwent a redo procedure, all from the group of patients with acute PV reconnection. In a multivariate model, acute PV reconnection was a strong independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (hazards ratio [HR], 6.36; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.12–31.6).

Conclusion

Identification of acute PV reconnection, even when successfully targeted, is a strong predictor of arrhythmia recurrence following PVI.     

Is circumferential pulmonary vein isolation preferable to stepwise segmental pulmonary vein isolation for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

BACKGROUND: Stepwise segmental pulmonary vein isolation (SPVI) and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) have been developed to treat patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but the preferable approach for paroxysmal AF (PAF) has not been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients with symptomatic PAF were randomized into a stepwise SPVI group (n=55) or CPVI group (n=55). Systemic SPVI combined with left atrial linear ablation tailored by inducibility of AF was performed in the stepwise SPVI group. Circumferential linear ablation around the left and right-sided pulmonary veins (PVs) guided by 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping was performed in the CPVI group. The endpoints of ablation are non-induciblity of AF in the stepwise SPVI group and continuity of circular lesions combined with PV isolation in the CPVI group. After the initial procedures, atrial tachyarrhythmis (ATa) recurred within the first 3 months in 23 of the 55 patients (41.8%) who underwent stepwise SPVI and in 20 of the 55 patients (36.4%) who had CPVI (p=0.69). Repeat procedures were performed in 7 patients from the stepwise SPVI group and 5 from the CPVI group (p=0.76). During the 3-9 months after the last procedure, 46 patients (83.6%) from the CPVI group and 43 (78.2%) from the stepwise SPVI group did not have symptomatic ATa while not taking anti-arrhythmic drugs (p=0.63). Severe subcutaneous hematoma or PV stenosis occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of stepwise SPVI is comparable to that of CPVI for patients with PAF.     

Pulmonary vein isolation to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: conventional versus multi-electrode radiofrequency ablation

Purpose

For patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), a curvilinear multi-electrode ablation (MEA) catheter has been reported to be successful to achieve pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. However, this approach has not been compared prospectively with conventional PV isolation (CPVI) using a standard circular mapping catheter and 3D electro-anatomic mapping. In this prospective non-randomized study, we compared the efficacy of these two techniques.

Methods

Of 185 consecutive patients, age 54.6?±?10.1?years, with symptomatic paroxysmal AF (PAF), 96 patients underwent PV isolation by CPVI and 89 patients underwent MEA to isolate the PVs. CPVI was performed by encircling the left- and right-sided PVs. During MEA, the PV ablation catheter (Medtronic, USA) was used to isolate PVs with duty-cycled radiofrequency energy.

Results

The mean procedure time was 171.73?±?52.87?min for CPVI and 133.25?±?37.99?min for MEA, respectively (P?P?=?0.651). At 12?months, 80% of patients who underwent CPVI and 82% of patients who underwent MEA were free of symptomatic PAF off antiarrhythmic drug therapy (P?=?0.989). Among the variables of age, gender, duration and frequency of PAF, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial size, structural heart disease, and the ablation technique, only an increased left atrial size was an independent predictor of recurrent PAF. Left atrial flutter occurred after CPVI in two patients and after MEA ablation in three patients.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing catheter ablation for PAF, MEA and CPVI proved equally efficacious.     

Role of the vein of marshall in atrial fibrillation recurrences after catheter ablation: therapeutic effect of ethanol infusion

Vein of Marshall Ethanol in Recurrent AF. Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter can recur after pulmonary vein (PV) antral isolation (PVAI). The vein of Marshall (VOM) has been linked to the genesis of AF. We hypothesized that the VOM may play a role in AF recurrences and that VOM ethanol infusion may have therapeutic value in this setting. Methods and Results: Sixty-one patients with recurrent AF or flutter after PVAI were studied. The VOM was successfully cannulated in 54; VOM and PV electrograms were recorded, and differential PV-VOM pacing was performed. VOM signals were present in all patients; however, VOM triggers of AF could not be demonstrated. VOM tachycardia was present in 1 patient. Left inferior (LIPV) and left superior (LSPV) reconnection was present in 32 and 30 patients, respectively. Differential pacing in VOM and LIPV showed VOM-mediated LIPV reconnection in 5/32 patients. In others, VOM and PV connected indirectly via left atrial tissues. Up to four 1 cc infusions of 98% ethanol were delivered in the VOM. Regardless of the reconnection pattern, ethanol infusion eliminated LIPV and LSPV reconnection in 23/32 and 13/30 patients, respectively. Ethanol terminated VOM and LIPV tachycardias in 2 patients. There were no acute procedural complications. Conclusions: VOM signals are consistently present in recurrent AF. VOM may rarely play a role in PV reconnection. However, VOM ethanol infusion can be useful in patients with recurrent AF after PVAI, assisting in achieving redisconnection of reconnected left PVs.     

Pulmonary Vein Contraction Before and After Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary Vein Contraction After Ablation. Introduction: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) may provide a noninvasive method to test for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation after ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) by detecting changes in PV contraction. Methods: PV contraction (the maximal percentage change in PV cross‐sectional area [CSA] during the cardiac cycle) measured 1 month before and 2 months after PV isolation was compared in 63 PVs from 16 patients with medically refractory AF. Repeat cMRI imaging and invasive catheter mapping was performed prior to repeat PV ablation in 50 PVs from 14 additional patients with recurrent AF. Contraction in PVs with sustained isolation after the initial ablation was compared to contraction in PVs with electrical reconnection to adjacent atrium. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff PV contraction value for prediction of PV‐atrial reconnection after ablation. The cutoff value was then prospectively tested in 40 PVs from 12 additional patients. Results: PV contraction decreased after AF ablation (22.4 ± 10% variation in CSA before ablation vs 10.1 ± 8% variation in CSA after ablation, P < 0.00001). PVs with sustained isolation on invasive mapping contracted less than PVs with electrical reconnection to adjacent atrium (13.7 ± 10.6% vs 21.4 ± 9.3%, P = 0.021). PV contraction produced a c‐index of 0.74 for prediction of PV‐atrial reconnection after ablation and >17% variation in PV CSA predicted reconnection with a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 66.7%. Conclusion: PV contraction is reduced by ablation. PV contraction measurement may provide a noninvasive method to test for PV isolation after ablation procedures. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 169‐174, February 2011)     

The Permanency of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Balloon Cryoablation Catheter

Chronic PV Isolation With the Cryoballoon . Background: Because of its technical feasibility and presumed safety benefits, balloon cryoablation is being increasingly employed for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. While acute isolation has been demonstrated in most patients, little data are available on the chronic durability of cryoballoon lesions. Methods and Results: Twelve atrial fibrillation patients underwent PV isolation using either a 23‐mm or 28‐mm cryoballoon. For each vein, after electrical isolation was verified with the use of a circular mapping cathether, 2 bonus balloon ablation lesions were placed. Gaps in balloon occlusion were overcome using either a spot cryocatheter or a “pull‐down” technique. A prespecified second procedure was performed at 8–12 weeks to assess for long‐term PV isolation. Acute PV isolation was achieved in all PVs in the patient cohort (n = 48 PVs), using the cryoballoon alone in 47/48 PVs (98%); a “pull‐down” technique was employed for 5 PVs (1 right superior pulmonary vein, 2 right inferior pulmonary veins, and 2 left inferior pulmonary veins). The gap in the remaining vein was ablated with a spot cryocatheter. During the second mapping procedure, 42 of 48 PVs (88%) remained isolated. One vein had reconnected in 2 patients, while 2 veins had reconnected in another 2 patients. All PVs initially isolated with the “pull‐down” technique remained isolated at the second procedure. Conclusions: Cryoballoon ablation allows for durable PV isolation with the use of a single balloon. With maintained chronic isolation in most PVs, it may represent a significant step toward consistent and lasting ablation procedures. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 731‐737, July 2010)     

Clinical predictors and outcomes associated with acute return of pulmonary vein conduction during pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein electrical isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, recurrence of pulmonary vein (PV) conduction after ablation may limit long-term success. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the clinical predictors of acute PV reconnection during PVI and assess the long-term clinical outcomes associated with this phenomenon. METHODS: We studied all patients with AF referred for PVI between November 2000 and August 2004. Over the course of the study period, PVI of arrhythmogenic PVs was performed segmentally using a 4-mm tip (52 degrees , 40 W, up to 90 seconds) or 8-mm tip catheter (50 degrees , 70 W, up to 60 seconds). PVI was defined as entry and exit block using a multipolar Lasso catheter. All veins were resampled to confirm isolation after 20-60 minutes. AF control was defined as no AF on or off a previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drug. Follow-up data included transtelephonic monitoring and clinical data collection from patient interviews. RESULTS: There were 424 patients who underwent isolation of 1,347 PVs during the study period. Acute reconnection of at least one PV occurred in 211 (50%) of the 424 patients and 326 (24%) of 1,347 of the PVs targeted. The left superior PV was most likely to acutely recover conduction compared with the other veins (left superior 31%, right superior 26%, right inferior 22%, left inferior 24%; P = .03). Patients with acute reconnection were more likely to be older, have a larger left atrium, have a history of hypertension or obstructive sleep apnea, and demonstrate persistent AF. After a single procedure, AF control was achieved in 153 (70%) of the 213 patients who demonstrated acute PV reconnection compared with 148 (73%) of 211 patients without acute PV reconnection observed (P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: Acute return of PV conduction is common after successful PVI and is more likely to occur in older patients with nonparoxysmal AF, hypertension, a large left atrium, and sleep apnea. There was no significant difference in acute PV reconnection between the 4-mm and 8-mm tip RF catheter despite differences in power and duration of energy delivery. Furthermore, there was no effect of PV reconnection on long-term AF control after repeated disconnection was performed.     

Clinical implications of reconnection between the left atrium and isolated pulmonary veins provoked by adenosine triphosphate after extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation

Introduction: Dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction can be provoked by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) after extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation (EEPVI). However, the clinical implication of reconnection between the left atrium (LA) and isolated PVs provoked by ATP (ATP-reconnection) remains unknown.
Methods and Results: We studied the clinical consequences of ATP-reconnection during intravenous isoproterenol infusion (ISP-infusion). EEPVI severs conduction between the LA and ipsilateral PVs at their junction. Radiofrequency energy is applied at a distance from the PV ostia guided by double Lasso catheters placed within the ipsilateral superior and inferior PVs. This study comprised 82 patients (67 men, 56 ± 9 years old) with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent injection of ATP during ISP infusion after successful EEPVI (ATP(+) group). We compared clinical characteristics of 170 patients who underwent earlier EEPVI prior to our use of ATP injection after successful EEPVI (ATP(N/D) group) with those of ATP(+) group patients who underwent one session of EEPVI. ATP-reconnection occurred in 34 (41%) of 82 ATP(+) group patients. Additional radiofrequency applications were performed to eliminate ATP-reconnection in all ipsilateral PVs. Continuous ATP-reconnection of more than 20 seconds duration occurred in six (7.3%) of 82 patients. A total of 102 (60%) of 170 patients in the ATP(N/D) group had no recurrence of AF, whereas 60 (73%) of 82 ATP(+) group patients who underwent only one EEPVI session have had no recurrence of AF in a 6.1 ± 3.3-month follow-up period (P = 0.04).
Conclusion: Radiofrequency application for provoked ATP-reconnection may reduce clinical AF recurrence.     

Distribution of electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation using a duty-cycled radiofrequency circular ablation catheter

BackgroundCircular ablation catheters (PVAC) have been shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The electrophysiological characteristics of the pulmonary veins (PVs) during repeat procedures remain unknown.ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of PV isolation (PVI) using PVAC and to determine the typical sites of electrical reconnection (ER) of PVs.Methods79 patients with PAF underwent PVI using PVAC. Those who remained symptomatic underwent repeat procedure using a high-density 3D electroanatomical mapping to determine the sites of ERs.ResultsIn total, AF recurrence was documented in 33 patients (41.7%) during the mean follow-up of 1427±378 days. Twenty-two patients had a further ablation. ER of at least one PV was found in all patients. Left upper, left lower, left common, right upper and right lower PV showed ER in 15, 13, 3, 13 and 12 patients, respectively. There was no difference in the number of ERs between individual PVs. In the left upper and left lower PV, 91.7% and 87.5% of gaps, respectively, were localized on the lateral ridge or carina. Sites of ER in the right upper PV were clustered either in the posterior superior (75%) or in the anterior inferior (25%) quadrants of the vein. Reconnection sites in the right lower PV were scattered equally around its whole circumference.ConclusionTypical sites of PV ER are carina and the lateral ridge of the left PVs and superior-posterior aspect of the right upper PV, whereas right lower PV seems to have no typical “reconnection profile”.     

心房颤动初次环肺静脉隔离与再次消融的关键部位分析

目的评价心房颤动（房颤）初次环肺静脉隔离与再次消融的关键部位分布特点。方法入选48例房颤复发患者,其中男性30例,女性18例;平均年龄54.3±10.2岁;阵发性房颤24例,慢性房颤24例。初次消融采用环肺静脉隔离。再次消融距初次消融时间平均37.2±7.4d。环肺静脉隔离的关键部位为消融时引起肺静脉电位延迟、激动顺序变化或肺静脉电位频率减慢和肺静脉电隔离的部位。将环肺静脉消融线划均分为8个区域,统计初次消融和再次消融关键部位的分布异同。结果48例患者初次消融共有关键部位145个,平均每例患者3.02±1.08个;再次消融共有关键部位76个,平均每例患者1.58±1.09个（P〈0.001）。阵发性房颤7例（29.2%）左肺静脉传导未恢复,7例（29.2%）右肺静脉传导未恢复;12例（50%）左肺静脉中再次消融关键部位与初次消融相同者6例,位于初次消融关键部位的相邻节段者6例;8例（33.3%）右肺静脉中再次消融关键部位与初次消融相同者3例,位于初次消融关键部位的相邻节段者5例。慢性房颤9例（37.5%）左肺静脉传导未恢复,11例（45.8%）右肺静脉传导未恢复;10例（41.7%）左肺静脉中再次消融关键部位与初次消融相同者3例,位于初次消融关键部位的相邻节段者7例;5例（20.8%）右肺静脉中再次消融关键部位与初次消融相同者2例,位于初次消融关键部位的相邻节段者3例。结论房颤复发患者再次消融关键部位显著少于初次消融。约30%~40%一侧肺静脉传导未恢复,约20%~50%再次消融关键部位位于初次消融关键部位或其邻近节段。提示对于关键部位及其附近应巩固消融。     

Electroanatomic properties of the pulmonary veins: slowed conduction, low voltage and altered refractoriness in AF patients

Electroanatomic Properties of the Pulmonary Veins. Introduction: Rapid PV activity is critical in initiating and maintaining AF. The underlying substrate responsible for this remains uncertain. We sought to identify if patients with paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) have an abnormal substrate within the pulmonary veins (PVs). Methods and Results: Thirty‐nine patients with AF (21 PAF, 18 PeAF) were compared with 15 age‐matched controls with left‐sided accessory pathways (AVRT). High‐density 3D electroanatomic maps of the PVs were created. PV voltage, conduction, PV muscle sleeve length, effective refractory periods (ERPs) of the PVs, posterior left atrium (PLA), left atrial appendage (LAA) and distal coronary sinus (CSd), and signal complexity were assessed. Compared with controls, the PVs of AF patients had (1) lower mean‐voltage and a higher % low‐voltage; (2) shorter PV muscle sleeves; (3) slower conduction; (4) shorter ERP; and (5) more prevalent complex signals. Compared with the PAF group, the PeAF group had (1) higher % low voltage; (2) slower conduction; and (3) more complex signals. In PAF patients, the PLA and LAA ERPs were longer than controls and the PV ERP was shorter than controls; in PeAF patients PLA and LAA ERPs were reduced, but to a lesser extent than in the PVs. AF induction occurred during PV ERP testing in both AF groups, but not controls. Conclusions: PAF and PeAF patients demonstrate electrical and electroanatomic remodeling of the PVs compared to control patients without prior AF. Some of these changes were more marked in PeAF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 1083‐1091, October 2011)     

心房颤动消融术中肺静脉传导恢复的识别及再干预对疗效的影响

目的观察阵发性心房颤动(房颤)环肺静脉电隔离术(CPVI)中不同观察时间内肺静脉传导急性恢复的发生率,并评价再次电隔离术对于临床疗效的影响。方法入选阵发性房颤患者90例,其中男性51例,女性39例,平均年龄56·4±12·3(45～73)岁;随机分为三组行CPVI,组A实现肺静脉电隔离不予观察,组B电隔离后观察时间30min,组C电隔离后观察时间60min,评价肺静脉传导恢复发生率并对其再次行电隔离术。术后随访心电图和24小时动态心电图评价疗效。结果所有患者顺利完成消融术。组A平均手术时间显著短于组B和组C。肺静脉隔离时间和X线透视时间三组中每两组差异均无统计学意义。组B左肺静脉隔离后30min传导恢复8例(25%),60min电位恢复共10例(31·2%);右肺静脉隔离后30min传导恢复6例(18·8%)。组C左肺静脉隔离后30min传导恢复9例(30%),60min传导恢复共11例(36·7%);右肺静脉隔离后30min7例(23·3%)传导恢复,60min共8例(26·7%)传导恢复。平均随访6·7±2·3(4～9)个月,组A17例(60·7%)、组B27例(84·3%)、组C26例(86·7%)无房性快速性心律失常发作,P=0·04。结论环肺静脉电隔离术中肺静脉传导急性恢复率为30%左右,多数发生在肺静脉隔离后30min内,再次电隔离术有助于提高消融成功率。     

Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: the role of key target sites.

AIMS: Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) had been proved effective for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the achievement of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was sometimes challenging. PVs could not be isolated until some key target sites (KTSs) were ablated thoroughly. The aim of our study was to explore the distribution of KTSs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-two cases (271 males, mean age 62.5 +/- 12.6 years) with drug-refractory AF were enrolled for catheter ablation. CARTO-guided CPVI was performed in all cases with one circular catheter for verification of PVs isolation. Target sites where PV potentials delayed, conduction sequence changed, slowed down, or isolated were defined as KTSs. From 452 CPVI procedures, 1520 KTSs were identified; 813 of which were located at left PV antrums and 707 were at right PV antrums. KTSs at left PV antrums were most commonly situated at anterior wall (63%), while KTSs at right PV antrums were most commonly situated at posterior wall (66.2%). Additional gaps ablation was performed for left PVs in 344 cases and for right PVs in 248 cases owing to incomplete PVs isolation by a single attempt of CPVI. One thousand one hundred and fifty-eight KTSs were identified, 662 of which were located at left PV antrums and 496 were at right PV antrums. At the anterior wall, 66.1% of left PV KTSs were located, and 67.9% of right PV KTSs were located at the posterior wall. Out of 1158, 961 (82.99%) KTSs were predicted correctly by circular mapping. PV isolation could not be achieved until some KTSs were ablated by higher power, longer duration, and higher irrigation rate than usual. CONCLUSION: KTSs during CPVI were most commonly situated at the anterior wall of left PVs and at the posterior wall of right PVs. Circular mapping within ipsilateral PVs' ostia could accurately predict the location of KTSs. Some KTSs must be ablated thoroughly by applying higher power, longer duration, and higher irrigation rate than usual to achieve PV isolation.     

Optimal observation time after completion of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation to prevent chronic pulmonary vein reconnections

Purpose

To identify predictors of chronic pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection (CPVR) after successful circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF).

Materials and methods

A total of 718 PVs from 181 consecutive AF patients (141 males, median age 61 years, 92 paroxysmal AF) who underwent a second ablation procedure for recurrent AF were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

During the second procedure, a CPVR was observed in 477 PVs (66.4%) among 169 patients. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, the observation time after the final completion of the PVI (OT-final) was a significant negative predictor (odds ratio 0.980; P < 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that the greatest area under the curve was for the OT-final (0.670). At an optimal cutoff of 35 min, the sensitivity and specificity for predicting a CPVR were 66.9% and 60.6%, respectively. By Kaplan Meier analysis, CPVR was more frequent in PVs with an OT-final of < 35 min than ≥ 35 min (log-rank test, P = 0.018). In a vessel-by-vessel analysis, the OT-final at all PV sites was a significant negative predictor, while male gender in the right PVs and left-inferior PV, number of RF applications for the ipsilateral CPVI in the right PVs and left-superior PV, and major PV diameter in the left-superior PV were significant positive predictors of a CPVR (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

An optimal observation time (≥ 35 min in this study) to determine whether PVI is successfully completed during the initial CPVI for AF may be needed to prevent a CPVR and subsequent AF recurrence thereafter.     

心房颤动环肺静脉隔离术后复发左房房性心动过速的特点及消融治疗

目的探讨心房颤动(简称房颤)环肺静脉隔离术后(CPVI)复发左房房性心动过速(简称房速)再次射频消融中,房速机制的鉴别和消融策略的选择。方法18例房颤经CPVI术后复发房速患者,其中男16例,女2例,年龄61.4±6.5(50～70)岁。在持续稳定的自发/诱发房速时在Carto指导下行激动顺序标测,经电生理检测,明确房速机制并选择相应消融方式:对于局灶性房速,重新阻断原消融径线上裂隙或消融最早激动区;对于折返性房速,明确关键峡部,行线性消融,如果有肺静脉电位亦行对裂隙的消融。结果共有13例肺静脉恢复电活动(72.7%)。局灶性房速6例,折返性房速12例(包括11例左房大折返和1例肺静脉-左房折返)。相应方式消融后房速均转为窦性心律,且肺静脉电位消失。结论房颤CPVI术后复发的左房房速与肺静脉电位的恢复密切相关;与消融线和裂隙形成的折返有关。