Application of the TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina and Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome to an Unselected Emergency Department Chest Pain Population

Objectives: Patients presenting with chest pain or related symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia, without ST‐segment elevation (NSTE) on their presenting electrocardiograms, often present a diagnostic challenge in the emergency department (ED). Prompt and accurate risk stratification to identify those patients with NSTE chest pain who are at highest risk for adverse events is essential, however, to optimal management. Although validated and used frequently in patients already enrolled in acute coronary syndrome trials, the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score never has been examined for its value in risk stratification in an all‐comers, non–trial‐based ED chest pain population. Methods: An analysis of an ED‐based prospective observational cohort study was conducted in 3,929 adult patients presenting with chest pain syndrome and warranting evaluation with an electrocardiogram. These patients had TIMI risk scores determined at ED presentation. The main outcome was the composite of death, acute myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization within 30 days. Results: The TIMI risk score at ED presentation successfully risk‐stratified this unselected cohort of chest pain patients with respect to 30‐day adverse outcome, with a range from 2.1%, with a score of 0, to 100%, with a score of 7. The highest correlation of an individual TIMI risk indicator to adverse outcome was for elevated cardiac biomarker at admission. Overall, the score had similar performance characteristics to that seen when applied to other databases of patients enrolled in clinical trials and registries using a 14‐day end point. Conclusions: The TIMI risk score may be a useful tool for risk stratification of ED patients with chest pain syndrome.     

Chest pain in a young female

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a common diagnosis in the emergency department (ED), the most severe manifestation of which is ST elevation on electrocardiogram (ECG). ST elevation reflects obstruction of flow through the coronary arteries, most commonly due to coronary atherosclerotic plaque rupture. However, alternative causes of coronary obstruction causing ST elevation are possible. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an unusual cause of ST elevation in ED patients which providers may encounter in patients without traditional atherosclerosis risk factors. Patients presenting with SCAD as a cause of ST elevation require unique management from traditional ACS. Here we report a case of a 43?year old female presenting with chest pain and unusual ECG findings including accelerated idioventricular rhythm followed by subtle ST segment elevation and resolution of abnormalities. This case illustrates subtle clinical and ECG findings suggestive of SCAD which emergency physicians should consider when evaluating patients for ACS in the absence of traditional clinical presentations. Such considerations may prompt physicians to avoid therapy for coronary plaque rupture which is not indicated in patients with SCAD.     

Early CK-MB Elevations Predict Ischemic Events in Stable Chest Pain Patients

ABSTRACT Objective : To demonstrate that creatine kinase-MB fraction (CK-MB) elevations within three hours of presentation in the emergency department (ED) are associated with subsequent ischemic events in clinically stable chest pain patients. Methods : Prospective cohort study at two university-affiliated teaching hospitals. Participants were consenting ED chest pain patients 25 years old or older without evidence of rhythm or hemodynamic instability (n = 449). Exclusions included ST-segment elevation ≥0.1 mV in ≥2 electrocardiogram leads, chest wall trauma, abnormal x-ray studies, and incomplete data collection. Measurements included presenting and three-hour CK-MB levels, presenting ECG, initial clinical impression of coronary care unit need, and clinical follow up. Monitored adverse events included myocardial ischemia necessitating coronary angioplasty or cardiac bypass surgery, recurrent in-hospital myocardial infarction, bradycardia requiring pacing, emergent cardioversion, cardiogenic shock, ventricular fibrillation, and death. Results : Overall, nine (2%) of 449 patients experienced an ischemic event within the first 48 hours. All nine patients required either coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. Four (44%) of the nine patients with 48-hour ischemic events had elevated CK-MB levels. Of 23 patients who had complications within one week of ED presentation, seven (30%) had elevated ED CK-MB levels. An elevated CK-MB level was associated with an ischemic event both within 48 hours (risk ratio 9.5; 95% CI 2.7–33.7) and within one week (risk ratio 5.2; 95% CI 2.3–11.7). Conclusions : An elevated CK-MB level within three hours of ED presentation is associated with a subsequent ischemic event in the clinically stable chest pain patient without ST-segment elevation. However, the ED CK-MB identifies only a minority of otherwise low-risk patients who develop ischemic events; other markers for diagnosing myocardial ischemia in the ED are needed.     

Outcome of low-risk patients discharged home after a normal cardiac troponin I

Patients with symptoms suggestive of, but at low risk for, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), who have a negative electrocardiogram (EKG) and a single normal troponin I at 6–9 h after symptom onset are frequently discharged from our Emergency Department (ED). We sought to determine their rate of adverse cardiac events at 30 days (ACE-30), defined as cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI), by chart review, telephone interview, or county death records. Of 663 patients, data were available for 588 (89%). Mean age was 48 years; 59% were male. There were 390 patients (66%) who complained of chest pain. Previous coronary artery disease (CAD) was reported in 145 patients (25%). Two patients (0.34%) had ACE-30, both with non-ST elevation MI. There were no cases of cardiac death. None of the patients died in Hennepin County within 30 days. At our institution, low-risk patients with symptoms suggestive of ACS who are discharged home after a normal cTnI drawn 6–9 h after symptom onset have a very low incidence of cardiac events at 30 days.     

The Association Between Emergency Department Crowding and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Chest Pain

Objectives: While emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem, few studies have demonstrated associations between crowding and outcomes. The authors examined whether ED crowding was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain syndromes (chest pain or related complaints of possible cardiac origin). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients ≥30 years of age with chest pain syndrome admitted to a tertiary care academic hospital from 1999 through 2006. The authors compared rates of inpatient adverse outcomes from ED triage to hospital discharge, defined as delayed acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, hypotension, dysrhythmias, and cardiac arrest, which occurred after ED arrival using five separate crowding measures. Results: Among 4,574 patients, 251 (4%) patients developed adverse outcomes after ED arrival; 803 (18%) had documented acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and of those, 273 (34%) had AMI. Compared to less crowded times, ACS patients experienced more adverse outcomes at the highest waiting room census (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 11.0) and patient-hours (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.0 to 13.6) and trended toward more adverse outcomes during time of high ED occupancy (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.0 to 9.3). Adverse outcomes were not significantly more frequent during times with the highest number of admitted patients (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.6 to 4.1) or the highest trailing mean length of stay (LOS) for admitted patients transferred to inpatient beds within 6 hours (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.5 to 4.0). Patients with non-ACS chest pain experienced more adverse outcomes during the highest waiting room census (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.4 to 8.4) and patient-hours (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 2.6 to 7.3), but not occupancy (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 0.9 to 3.3), number of admitted patients (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.1), or trailing LOS for admitted patients (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.6 to 2.0). Conclusions: There was an association between some measures of ED crowding and a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with both ACS-related and non–ACS-related chest pain syndrome.     

Predictive Value of T-wave Abnormalities at the Time of Emergency Department Presentation in Patients with Potential Acute Coronary Syndromes

Objectives: T‐wave abnormalities on electrocardiograms (ECGs) are common, but their ability to predict 30‐day cardiovascular outcomes at the time of emergency department (ED) presentation is unknown. The authors determined the association between T‐wave abnormalities on the presenting ECG and cardiovascular outcomes within 30 days of presentation in patients with potential acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of ED patients that presented with a potential ACS. Patients were excluded if they had a prior myocardial infarction, ST‐segment elevation or depressions, right or left bundle branch block, or Q‐waves on the initial ECG. Data included demographics, medical and cardiac history, and ECG findings including the presence or absence of T‐wave flattening, inversions of 1–5 mm, and inversions >5 mm. Investigators followed the hospital course for admitted patients, and 30‐day follow‐up was performed on all patients. The main outcome was a composite of death, acute myocardial infarction, revascularization, coronary stenosis greater than 50%, or a stress test with reversible ischemia. Results: Of 8,298 patient visits, 5,582 met criteria for inclusion: 4,166 (74.6%) had no T‐wave abnormalities, 721 (12.9%) had T‐wave flattening in two or more leads, 659 (11.8%) had T‐wave inversions of 1–5 mm, and 36 (0.64%) had T‐wave inversions >5 mm. The composite endpoint was more common in patients with T‐wave flattening (8.2% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.0001; relative risk [RR] = 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 1.9), T‐wave inversions 1–5 mm (13.2% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.0001; RR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.8 to 3.1), and T‐wave inversions >5 mm (19.4% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.0001; RR = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.7 to 6.1), or any T‐wave abnormality (10.8% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.0001; RR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.6 to 2.3), even after adjustment for initial troponin. This association also existed in the subset of patients without known coronary artery disease. Conclusions: In patients with potential ACS presenting to the ED, T‐wave abnormalities are associated with higher rates of 30‐day cardiovascular events.     

Outcome of chest pain patients discharged from a French emergency department: a 60-day prospective study

Background

Chest pain (CP) is a common complaint among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Previous studies suggest that between 2% and 5% of ED patients who present with CP and are sent home develop an acute coronary syndrome within 30 days. In France, no prospective data are available concerning the outcome of CP patients discharged from the ED.

Objective

The objective of our study was to determine the rate of adverse cardiac events (ACE) within a period of 60 days after discharge from the ED.

Methods

From October 2007 to February 2008, consecutive patients aged 25 years or more who presented to the ED with CP were prospectively included. Patients discharged from the ED were contacted by phone at 60 days to determine their clinical course and the occurrence of an ACE.

Results

There were 322 CP patients enrolled, representing 3.9% of all medical admissions to the ED; 40.4% of these patients were hospitalized and 59.6% were discharged. Three patients (1.6%) could not be contacted for follow-up, leaving 189 patients eligible for the study. The rate of ACE was 3.7%: one ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and six non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions. Follow-up revealed that 39.1% of patients saw a cardiologist and that 14.2% were readmitted for CP.

Conclusion

We found that CP is a frequent complaint in patients who present to our ED, and that a small proportion (3.7%) is mistakenly discharged and presents with an ACE during the 60-day follow-up period.     

Single test rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using the limit of detection of a new high-sensitivity troponin I assay

ObjectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndromes. Specifically, we evaluated the use of a single blood test at the time of arrival in the ED, using low hs-cTnI cut-offs.MethodsIn a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study at 14 centers, we included patients presenting to the ED with suspected ACS within 12 h of symptom onset. We drew blood for hs-cTnI (Siemens ADVIA Centaur, overall 99th percentile 47 ng/L, limit of quantification [LoQ] 2.50 ng/L) on arrival. Patients underwent serial cardiac troponin testing over 3–6 h. The primary outcome was an adjudicated diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, AMI or revascularization) after 30 days. Test characteristics for hs-cTnI were calculated using previously reported cut-offs set at the LoQ and 5 ng/L.ResultsWe included 999 patients, including 131 (13.1%) with an adjudicated diagnosis of AMI. Compared to the LoQ (100.0% sensitivity [95% CI 95.9–100.0%]), 99.7% negative predictive value [NPV; 95% CI 97.6–100.0%]), a 5 ng/L cut-off had slightly lower sensitivity (99.2%; 95% CI 95.8–100.0%) and similar NPV (99.8%; 95% CI 98.6–100.0%) but would rule out more patients (28.6% at the LoQ vs 50.4% at 5 ng/L). MACE occurred in 2 (0.7%) patients with hs-cTnI below the LoQ and 7 (1.4%) patients with hs-cTnI < 5 ng/L. Accounting for time from symptom onset or ECG ischemia did not further improve sensitivity.ConclusionThe Siemens ADVIA Centaur hs-cTnI assay has high sensitivity and NPV to rule out AMI with a single blood test in the ED. At the LoQ cut-off a sensitivity > 99% can be achieved. At a 5 ng/L cut-off it may be possible to rule out AMI for over 50% patients.     

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Rapid Disposition of Low-risk Emergency Department Patients with Chest Pain Syndromes

Background Patients with recent normal cardiac catheterization are at low risk for complications of ischemic chest pain. Computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography has high correlation with cardiac catheterization for detection of coronary stenosis. Therefore, the investigators' emergency department (ED) incorporated CT coronary angiography into the evaluation of low-risk patients with chest pain. Objectives To report on the 30-day cardiovascular event rates of the first 54 patients evaluated by this strategy. Methods Low-risk chest pain patients (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] score of 2 or less) without acute ischemia on an electrocardiogram had CT coronary angiography performed in the ED. If the CT coronary angiography was negative, the patient was discharged home. The main outcomes were death and myocardial infarction within 30 days of ED discharge, as determined by telephone follow up and record review. Data are presented as percentage frequency of occurrence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Of the 54 patients evaluated, after CT coronary angiography, 46 patients (85%) were immediately released from the ED, and none had cardiovascular complications within 30 days. Eight patients were admitted after CT coronary angiography: one had >70% stenosis, five patients had 50%–69% stenosis, and two had 0–49% stenosis. Three patients had further noninvasive testing; one had reversible ischemia, and catheterization confirmed the results of CT coronary angiography. All patients were followed for 30 days, and none (0; 95% CI = 0 to 6.6%) had an adverse event during index hospitalization or at 30-day follow up. Conclusions When used in the clinical setting for the evaluation of ED patients with low-risk chest pain, CT coronary angiography may safely allow rapid discharge of patients with negative studies. Further study to conclusively determine the safety and cost effectiveness of this approach is warranted.     

EMS blood collection from patients with acute chest pain reduces emergency department length of stay

BackgroundExpediting the measurement of serum troponin by leveraging EMS blood collection could reduce the diagnostic time for patients with acute chest pain and help address Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding. However, this practice has not been examined among an ED chest pain patient population in the United States.MethodsA prospective observational cohort study of adults with non-traumatic chest pain without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was conducted in three EMS agencies between 12/2016–4/2018. During transport, paramedics obtained a patient blood sample that was sent directly to the hospital core lab for troponin measurement. On ED arrival HEART Pathway assessments were completed by ED providers as part of standard care. ED providers were blinded to troponin results from EMS blood samples. To evaluate the potential impact on length of stay (LOS), the time difference between EMS blood draw and first clinical ED draw was calculated. To determine the safety of using troponin measures from EMS blood samples, the diagnostic performance of the HEART Pathway for 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE: composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization) was determined using EMS troponin plus arrival ED troponin and EMS troponin plus a serial 3-h ED troponin.ResultsThe use of EMS blood samples for troponin measures among 401 patients presenting with acute chest pain resulted in a mean potential reduction in LOS of 72.5 ± SD 35.7 min. MACE at 30 days occurred in 21.0% (84/401), with 1 cardiac death, 78 MIs, and 5 revascularizations without MI. Use of the HEART Pathway with EMS and ED arrival troponin measures yielded a NPV of 98.0% (95% CI: 89.6–100). NPV improved to 100% (95% CI: 92.9–100) when using the EMS and 3-h ED troponin measures.ConclusionsEMS blood collection used for core lab ED troponin measures could significantly reduce ED LOS and appears safe when integrated into the HEART Pathway.     

Myeloperoxidase and C-reactive protein in patients with cocaine-associated chest pain

Background

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are markers of inflammation and elevated levels have been found in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) unrelated to cocaine. We evaluated the utility of MPO and CRP for diagnosis of ACS and the prediction of 30-day adverse cardiovascular events in patients with cocaine-related chest pain.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study of ED patients who received evaluation for ACS. Structured data collection at presentation included demographics, chest pain history, laboratory results, and electrocardiographic data. Our primary outcome was diagnosis of ACS at index visit and 30-day adverse events. As a secondary analysis, we provide data on a matched cohort without cocaine use.

Results

Baseline data and CRP were available for 95 cocaine users; 82 had MPO data also. Patients had a mean age of 46.6 (SD 8.1) years, 90% were black, and 62% were male. Acute coronary syndrome occurred in 7% of cocaine users. With respect to diagnosis of ACS, the area under the curve was poor for both MPO (0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-0.91) and CRP (0.63; 95% CI: 0.39-0.88). Similar results were found for 30-day events. With respect to prognosis of 30-day adverse cardiovascular events, the area under the curve was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.45-0.91) for MPO and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.45-0.90) for CRP.Similar results were found for 30-day events. In the matched cohort of patients who were not cocaine users, performance of MPO (n = 66) and CRP (n = 86) was also poor.

Conclusions

Myeloperoxidase and CRP are not useful for diagnosis or prognosis of patients with cocaine-associated chest pain.     

Comparison of high sensitivity troponin T and I assays in the diagnosis of non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in emergency patients with chest pain

Objectives

Concentrations of troponin measured with high sensitivity troponin assays are raised in a number of emergency department (ED) patients; however many are not diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Clinical comparisons between the early use (2 h after presentation) of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and I (hs-cTnI) assays for the diagnosis of AMI have not been reported.

Design and methods

Early (0 h and 2 h) hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assay results in 1571 ED patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without ST elevation on electrocardiograph (ECG) were evaluated. The primary outcome was diagnosis of index AMI adjudicated by cardiologists using the local cTnI assay results taken ≥ 6 h after presentation, ECGs and clinical information. Stored samples were later analysed with hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assays.

Results

The ROC analysis for AMI (204 patients; 13.0%) for hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI after 2 h was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94–0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.99) respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI for AMI after 2 h were 94.1% (95% CI: 90.0–96.6) and 95.6% (95% CI: 91.8–97.7), 79.0% (95% CI: 76.8–81.1) and 92.5% (95% CI: 90.9–93.7), 4.48 (95% CI: 4.02–5.00) and 12.86 (95% CI: 10.51–15.31), and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04–0.13) and 0.05 (95% CI:0.03–0.09) respectively.

Conclusions

Exclusion of AMI 2 h after presentation in emergency patients with possible ACS can be achieved using hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI assays. Significant differences in specificity of these assays are relevant and if using the hs-cTnT assay, further clinical assessment in a larger proportion of patients would be required.     

Comparison of radiation exposure of trauma patients from diagnostic radiology procedures before and after the introduction of a panscan protocol

Objectives: To compare the proportion of patients exposed to a radiation dose in excess of 20 mSv, and to document missed injuries before and after the introduction of a panscan protocol for blunt trauma. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from our trauma database for 6 months before and after implementation of the protocol. All radiological studies performed during the initial patient assessment were identified. Radiation doses for each patient were calculated. Subgroup analyses were age ≤30 and >30 years, injury severity score (ISS) <16 and ≥16, and patient disposition as discharged from ED or admitted. Results: There were 656 patients before and 624 after the introduction of the protocol. The proportion of patients exposed to a radiation dose >20 mSv increased by 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4–12), which equated to one extra person being exposed to >20 mSv for every 13 patients treated after the introduction of the protocol. The odds of receiving a radiation dose >20 mSv after the introduction of the protocol compared with the odds before were increased across all subgroups (≤30 years: odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% CI 1.3–5.8, P = 0.008; >30 years: OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5–3.4, P < 0.001; ISS < 16: OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5–3.9, P < 0.001; ISS ≥ 16: OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0–3.7, P = 0.04; discharged home: OR 2.1, 95% CI 0.7–6.0, P = 0.17; admitted: OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5–3.3, P < 0.001). There were six missed injuries before and four after. Conclusions: Introduction of a panscan protocol increased the proportion of trauma patients receiving a radiation dose >20 mSv. This increased risk occurred regardless of age or injury severity.     

Stress testing before discharge is not required for patients with low and intermediate risk of acute coronary syndrome after emergency department short stay assessment

Objective: To investigate the usefulness of stress testing before discharge in patients assessed low to intermediate risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: A prospective observational study was undertaken of patients presenting to the ED with suspected myocardial ischaemia. After negative initial electrocardiogram (ECG) and serum troponin testing, patients were admitted to the emergency short stay unit (ESSU) for further evaluation using a chest pain protocol that included stress testing as the final risk stratification tool. The primary outcome measure was evidence of myocardial ischaemia at stress testing. Results: Of the 300 patients enrolled and followed up, there were no deaths at 30 days and no myocardial infarcts in patients discharged from the short stay. Two patients (0.67%) had positive serum troponin levels at 6 h after the onset of chest pain and were diagnosed with non‐ST segment elevation myocardial infarctions. Three patients (1%) had abnormal stress testing and were admitted to hospital from ESSU. On review, all three patients were high risk, according to The National Heart Foundation of Australia/Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand guidelines. Conclusion: The present study showed that an ED short stay unit can effectively evaluate and manage patients with low and intermediate risk of ACS. The study suggests that patients with low and intermediate risk for ACS might safely be discharged after normal serial ECG and cardiac biomarkers, with a view to early outpatient stress testing. With strict adherence to admission criteria, there does not appear to be any benefit of stress testing before discharge.     

Emergency department diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is associated with significantly reduced mortality: A linked data population study

Objectives: We characterized patients admitted via ED with a principal hospital discharge diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) and compared mortality of those diagnosed in the ED with those diagnosed after admission. Methods: Patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis ICD 10 I26 presenting to the ED in Perth, Western Australia between 1 July 2000 and 30 December 2006 had records from the Emergency Department Information System linked to the Western Australian Hospital Morbidity Data System and the death registry. Results: Of 2250 patients (mean age 60.4), 1227 (54.5%) were female. Of 1931 patients with an ED diagnosis recorded, 1207 (62.5%) were diagnosed with PE in ED. Of these, 383 (17.0%) had presented to an ED within 28 days previously, 142 (37.1%) with either chest pain or breathing problems, with 207 (54.0%) admitted but not receiving a principal hospital discharge diagnosis of PE. There were 127 (5.6%) in‐hospital deaths. Controlling for age and comorbidity with logistic regression, patients diagnosed with PE in ED were less likely to die in hospital, within 7 and 30 days of ED arrival, than those diagnosed after admission (adjusted OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20–0.47; adjusted OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19–0.53; adjusted OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20–0.44; respectively). Conclusion: Making the diagnosis of PE in ED was associated with a substantial survival advantage that persisted after hospital discharge.     

Prosthetic hip dislocations: Is relocation in the emergency department by emergency medicine staff better?

Objective: Prosthetic hip dislocation is common. This study compares prosthetic hip relocations attempted within the ED by emergency doctors and those under orthopaedic care in the ED or operating theatre (OT). Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to Auckland City Hospital Adult Emergency Department with prosthetic hip dislocations between 1 January 2003 and 14 April 2008. Primary outcomes were proportion of successful relocation attempts and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were: time to relocation, complications, post‐procedural advice, representation rate and long‐term outcomes for first‐time dislocations. There were 410 eligible presentations during the study period. Results: Emergency medicine (EM) was successful in 254/323 attempts (79%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 74–83). Orthopaedics were successful in 25/35 reductions in the ED (71%, 95% CI 55–84) and 49/51 OT attempts (96%, 95% CI 86–100), P = 0.004 for location OT versus ED. Median times to discharge were 8.8 h for EM, 28.3 h for orthopaedics in the ED and 81 h for orthopaedics in the OT, P < 0.001 for EM versus orthopaedics. Mechanical complications of procedures and early redislocations were infrequent. Complication of sedation were more often seen in OT compared to ED (23/47 [49%, 95% CI 35–63]vs 37/318 [12%, 95% CI 9–16]). Conclusion: There was no difference between EM and orthopaedics in the proportion of hips successfully relocated or complications in the ED; however, EM patients were discharged much sooner, with important resource implications. Procedures carried out in the OT were more successful than in the ED but resulted in prolonged hospital stays and were associated with more complications.