A Comparison of Ventricular Function During High Right Ventricular Septal and Apical Pacing after His-Bundle Ablation for Refractory Atrial Fibrillation

This study compares LV performance during high right ventricular septal (RVS) and apical (RVA) pacing in patients with LV dysfunction who underwent His-bundle ablation for chronic AF. We inserted a passive fixation pacing electrode into the RVA and an active fixation electrode in the RVS. A dual chamber, rate responsive pulse generator stimulated the RVA through the ventricular port and the RVS via the atrial port. Patients were randomized to initial RVA (VVIR) or RVS (AAIR) pacing for 2 months. The pacing site was reversed during the next 2 months. At the 2 and 4 month follow-up visit, each patient underwent a transthoracic echocardiographical study and a rest/exercise first pass radionuclide ventriculogram. We studied nine men and three women (mean age of 68 +/- 7 years) with congestive heart failure functional Class (NYHA Classification): I (3 patients), II (7 patients), and III (2 patients). The QRS duration was shorter during RVS stimulation (158 +/- 10 vs 170 +/- 11 ms, P < 0.001). Chronic capture threshold and lead impedance did not significantly differ. LV fractional shortening improved during RVS pacing (0.31 +/- 0.05 vs 0.26 +/- 0.07, P < 0.01). RVS activation increased the resting first pass LV ejection fraction (0.51 +/- 0.14 vs 0.43 +/- 0.10, P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed during RVS and RVA pacing in the exercise time (5.6 +/- 3.2 vs 5.4 +/- 3.1, P = 0.6) or the exercise first pass LV ejection fraction (0.58 +/- 0.15 vs 0.55 +/- 0.16, P = 0.2). The relative changes in QRS duration and LV ejection fraction at both pacing sites showed a significant correlation (P < 0.01). We conclude that RVS pacing produces shorter QRS duration and better chronic LV function than RVA pacing in patients with mild to moderate LV dysfunction and chronic AF after His-bundle ablation.     

Variability of Left Ventricular Electromechanical Activation during Right Ventricular Pacing: Implications for the Selection of the Optimal Pacing Site

Background: The right ventricular septum (RVS) and Hisian area (HA) are considered more “physiological” pacing sites than right ventricular apex (RVA). Studies comparing RVS to RVA sites have produced controversial results. There are no data about variability of electromechanical activation obtained by an approach using fluoroscopy and electrophysiological markers. This study compared the variability of left ventricular (LV) electromechanical activation in patients undergoing short‐term RVA and RVS with that measured during HA pacing based on fluoroscopy and electrophysiological markers. Methods: Tissue Doppler echocardiography was performed in 142 patients before and after RVA (54), RVS (44), and HA (44) pacing. Electromechanical activation was assessed by: (1) electromechanical latency (EML)‐interval between QRS onset and mechanical activation of basal LV; (2) intra‐LV dyssynchrony (intra‐LV)‐interval between earliest to the latest LV basal motion. The intra‐ and interpatients variability among pacing groups were assessed. Results: Pacing from RVA showed longer EML and higher degree of intra‐LV than RVS and HA pacing. RVA and RVS showed a higher variability than HA pacing with regard to intrapatient changes of EML (RVA vs RVS, P = 0.4; RVS vs HA, P = 0.01, RVA vs HA, P = 0.0002) and intra‐LV (RVA vs RVS, P = 0.2; RVS vs HA, P = 0.04; RVA vs HA, P = 0.005). Similar results were found in interpatients variability from paced‐values. Conclusions: RVA and RVS pacing produce a variable effect on LV electromechanical activation that is significantly more pronounced than HA pacing. A pacing site such as HA selected by fluoroscopic and electrophysiological markers maintains baseline and homogeneous LV activation pattern. (PACE 2010; 566–574)     

Efficacy of Ventricular Rate Stabilization by Right Ventricular Pacing During Atrial Fibrillation

To assess the effect of right ventricular pacing on rate regularity during exercise and daily life activities, 16 patients with sinoatrial disease and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied. Incremental ventricular pacing was commenced at 40 beats/min until > 95% of ventricular pacing were achieved during supine, sitting, and standing. Thirteen patients also underwent randomized paired submaximal exercise tests in either a fixed rate mode (VVI) or a ventricular rate stabilization (VRS) mode in which the pacingrate was set manually at 10 beats/min above the average AF rate duringthe last minute of each exercise stage. The pacing interval for rate regularization was shortest during standing (692 ± 26 ms) compared with either supine or sitting (757 ± 30 and 705 ± 26 ms, respectively, P < 0.05). During exercise, VRS pacing significantly increased the maximum rate (119 ± 5.2 vs 106 ± 4.2 ms, P < 0.05), percent of ventricular pacing (85%± 5% vs 23%± 7%, P < 0.05), rate regularity index (5.8%± 1.6% vs 13.4%± 1.9%, P < 0.05), and maximum level of oxygen consumption (12.4 ± 0.5 vs 11.3 ± 0.5 ml/kg, P < 0.05) compared with VVI pacing. There was no change in oxygen pulse or difference in symptom scores in this acute study between the two pacing modes. It is concluded that right ventricular pacing may significantly improve rate regularity and cardiopulmonary performance in patients with chronic AF. This may be incorporated in a pacing device for rate regularization of AF using an algorithm that is rate adaptive to postural and exercise stresses.     

Two-Year Experience with Rate-Modulated Pacing Controlled by Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation

Mixed venous oxy-hemoglobin saturation (M_VO₂) is a physiological variable with several features that might be desirable as a control parameter for rate adaptive pacing. Despite these desirable characteristics, the long-term reliability of the M_VO₂ sensor in vivo is uncertain. We, therefore, designed a study to prospectively evaluate the long-term performance of a permanently implanted M_VO₂ saturation sensor in patients requiring VVIR pacing. Under an FDA approved feasibility study, eight patients were implanted with a VVIR pulse generator and a right ventricular pacing lead incorporating an M_VO₂ sensor. In order to accurately assess long-term stability of the sensor, patients underwent submaximal treadmill exercise using the Chronotropic Assessment Exercise Protocol (CAEP) at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months following pacemaker implantation. Paired maximal exercise testing using the CAEP was also performed with the pacing system programmed to the VVI and VVIR modes in randomized sequence with measurement of expired gas exchange after 6 weeks and 12 months of follow-up. During maximal treadmill exercise the peak exercise heart rate (132 ± 9 vs 71.5 ± 5 beats/min, P < 0.00001) and maximal rate of oxygen consumption (1,704 ± 633 vs 1382 ± 407 mL/min, P = 0.01) were significantly greater in the VVIR than in the VVI pacing mode. Similarly, the duration of exercise was greater in the VVIR than the VVI pacing mode (8.9 ± 3.6 min vs 7.6 ± 3.7 min, P = 0.04). The resting M_VO₂ and the M_VO₂ at peak exercise were similar in the VVI and VVIR pacing modes (P = NS). However, the M_VO₂ at each comparable treadmill exercise stage was significantly higher in the VVIR mode than in the VVI mode (CAEP stage 1 (P = 0.005), stage 2 (P = 0.04), stage 3 (P = 0.008), and stage 4 (P = 0.04). The correlation between M_VO₂ and oxygen consumption (VO₂) was excellent (r = -0.93). Telemetry of the reflectance of red and infrared light and M_VO₂ in the right ventricle during identical exercise workloads revealed no significant change over the first 12 months of follow-up (ANOVA, P = NS). The chronotropic response to exercise remained proportional to VO₂ in all patients over the first 12 months of follow-up. The time course of change in M_VO₂ during maximal exercise was significantly faster than for VO₂. At the 18- and 24-month follow-up exercise tests, a significant deterioration of the sensor signal with attenuation of chronotropic response was noted for 4 of the 8 subjects with replacement of the pacing system required in one patient because of lack of appropriate rate modulation. Rate modulated VVIR pacing controlled by right ventricular M_VO₂ provides a chronotropic response that is highly correlated with VO₂. This parameter responds rapidly to changes in workload with kinetics that are more rapid than those of VO₂. Appropriate rate modulation provides a higher M_VO₂ at identical workloads than does VVI pacing. Although the M_VO₂ sensor remains stable and accurate over the first year following implantation, significant deterioration of the signal occurs by 18–24 months in many patients.     

Importance of Heart Rate Response During Exercise in Patients Using Atrioventricular Synchronous and Ventricular Pacemakers

Atrioventricular synchronous pacing offers advantages over fixed-rate ventricular (VVI) pacing both at rest and during exercise. This study compared the hemodynamic effects at rest and exercise of ventricular pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, ventricular pacing where the rate was increased during exercise and dual chamber pacing. Ten patients, age 63 +/- 8 years, with multiprogrammable DDD pacemakers were studied using supine bicycle radionuclide ventriculography. Radionuclide data during dual chamber pacing was acquired at rest and during a submaximal workload of 200-400 kpm/min. The pacemakers were then programmed to VVI pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, and 1 week later, studies were repeated in the VVI mode at rest, during exercise at a rate of 70 beats/min, and during exercise with the VVI pacemaker programmed to a rate adapted to the DDD pacing exercise rate. At rest, the cardiac output was lower in the VVI compared with the AV sequential mode (4.1 +/- 1.1 vs 5.7 +/- 1.1 1/min, P less than 0.01). During exercise, the cardiac output increased from resting values in the DDD and VVI pacing modes, however cardiac output in the rate-adapted VVI mode was higher than in the VVI mode with the rate maintained at 70 beats/min (8.1 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 1.1 1/min, P = 0.02). Three patients completed lower workloads with VVI pacing at 70 beats/min compared with AV synchronous pacing. At rest, AV sequential pacing was superior to VVI pacing, suggesting the importance of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling. With VVI pacing during exercise, cardiac output was improved with an increased pacemaker rate, suggesting that the heart rate response during exercise was the major determinant of the higher cardiac output.     

Rate Modulated Pacing Based on Right Ventricular dP/dt: Quantitative Analysis of Chronotropic Response

Right ventricular contractility increases in response to catecholamine stimulation and greater ventricular preload, factors that increase with exercise workload. Thus, the maximum systolic dP/dt may be a potentially useful sensor to control the pacing rate of a permanent pacing system. The present study was designed to test the long-term performance of a permanent pacemaker that modulates pacing rate based on right ventricular dP/dt and to quantitatively analyze the chronotropic response characteristics of this sensor in a group of patients with widely varying structural heart diseases and degrees of hemodynamic impairment. A permanent pacing system incorporating a high fidelity pressure sensor in the lead for measurement of right ventricular dP/dt was implanted in 13 patients with atrial arrhythmias and AV block, including individuals with coronary artery disease, hypertension, severe obstructive pulmonary disease with prior pneumonectomy, atrial septal defect, dilated cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and mitral stenosis. Patients underwent paired treadmill exercise testing in the VVI and VVIR pacing modes with measurement of expired gas exchange and quantitative analysis of chronotropic response using the concept of metabolic reserve. The peak right ventricular dP/dt ranged from 238–891 mmHg/sec with a pulse pressure that ranged from 19–41 mmHg. There was a positive correlation between the right ventricular dP/dt and pulse pressure (r = 0.70, P = 0.012). The maximum pacing rate and VO_2max were 72 ± 6 beats/min and 12.61 ± 4.0 cc O₂/kg per minute during VVI pacing and increased to 124 ± 18 beats/min and 15.89 ± 5.9 cc 0₂/kg per minute in the VVIR pacing mode (P < 0.0003 and P < 0.002, respectively). The integrated area under the normalized rate response curve was 96.7 ± 45.7% of expected during exercise and 100.1 ± 43.4% of expected during recovery. One patient demonstrated an anomalous increase in pacing rate in response to a change in posture to the left lateral decubitus position. Thus, the peak positive right ventricular dP/dt is an effective rate control parameter for permanent pacing systems. The chronotropic response was proportional to metabolic workload during treadmill exercise in this study population with widely varying forms of structural heart disease.     

Short-Term and Long-Term Changes of Left Ventricular Volumes During Rate-Adaptive and Single-Rate Pacing

To evaluate the adaptation of the heart to exercise during pacing, 15 patients with permanent endocardial pacemakers were studied; nine patients had atrioventricular universal (DDD) pacemakers (Symbios 7005) and six patients had activity detecting rate-responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacemakers (Activitrax 8403). Left ventricular function in each patient during rate variable pacing was compared to ventricular function during VVI single-rate pacing. End-systolic and end-diastolic volume changes during exercise were measured by radionuclide angiography and the amount of volume change was used to assess left ventricular function. Both short-term (within 4 hours) and long-term measurements (after at least 4 weeks) were made at rest and at 50% of the maximal exercise capacity in DDD or VVIR mode and were compared with VVI single-rate pacing. All patients, when changed from DDD or VVIR mode to VVI single-rate pacing showed a significant increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise, which increased even more after long-term VVI pacing. During long-term rate variable pacing, there was no increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise. DDD or VVIR pacing initially showed a substantial increase of the end-systolic volume during exercise combined with a decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction, suggesting a decrease of the left ventricular contractility. After 4 weeks, contractility improved both with DDD and VVIR pacing. We conclude that short-term DDD and VVIR pacing induces a temporary impairment of left ventricular function that improves after 4 weeks, whereas long-term VVI pacing is associated with left ventricular dilatation even at moderate levels of exercise.     

A Double-Blind Study of Submaximal Exercise Tolerance and Variation in Paced Rate in Atrial Synchronous Compared to Activity Sensor Modulated Ventricular Pacing

To assess the variation in paced rate during everyday activity and the importance of atrioventricular synchronization (AV synchrony) for submaximal exercise tolerance, atrial synchronous (DDD) and activity rate modulated ventricular (VVI,R) pacing were compared in 17 patients with high degree AV block. The patients were randomly assigned to either mode and evaluated by treadmill exercise to moderate exertion and by 24-hour Holter monitoring after 2 months in the DDD and VVI,R modes, respectively. At the end of the study, the patients were programmed to the pacing mode corresponding to the preferred study period. During the treadmill test, the mean exercise time to submaximal exertion (Borg 5/10), exertion ratings and respiratory rate did not differ between pacing modes despite a significantly lower ventricular rate in the VVI,R mode. The atrial rate during VVI,R pacing was significantly higher than the ventricular rate, but did not differ from the ventricular rate during DDD pacing. There was a diurnal variation in paced rate in both pacing modes. Paced ventricular rate was, however, higher and variation in paced rate greater in DDD compared to VVI,R pacing. Nine patients preferred the DDD mode, three patients preferred the VVI,R mode, while five subjects did not express any preference. The results from this study indicate that the variation in paced rate during activity sensor-driven VVI,R pacing does not match that during DDD pacing neither during everyday activities nor during submaximal treadmill exercise. Nevertheless, no differences in exercise time, Borg ratings, and respiratory rate during submaximal exercise were found. Thus, for most patients with high degree AV block, DDD and VVI,R pacing seem equally satisfactory for submaximal exercise.     

实时三维超声心动图评价右心室不同部位起搏对左心房同步性的影响

目的 采用实时三维超声心动图(RT-3DE)评价右心室心尖部(RVA)和间隔部(RVS)起搏对缓慢性心律失常患者左心房同步性的影响.方法 将51例高度或Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞患者分为RVA组(n=31)和RVS组(n=20),采用RT-3DE分别测算患者安置埋藏式心脏起搏器术前和术后1、3、6、12个月的左心房主动射血分数(LAAEF)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)及左心房16节段、12节段、6节段QRS波起点到左心房收缩最小收缩容积的时间标准差(Tmsv-16-SD、Tmsv-12-SD、Tmsv-6-SD)及最大时间差(Tmsv-16-Dif、Tmsv-12-Dif、Tmsv-6-Dif)的变化.并对以上参数进行统计学分析.结果 两组术后3、6、12个月的Tmsv-16-SD、Tmsv-12-SD及Tmsv-6-SD和两组术后各时间点的Tmsv-16-Dif、Tmsv-12-Dif、Tmsv-6-Dif均分别较各组术前增高(P均 <0.05),RVS组术后3、6、12个月Tmsv-16-SD、Tmsv-12-SD、Tmsv-6-SD和Tmsv-16-Dif、Tmsv-12-Dif、Tmsv-6-Dif均小于同时点RVA组(P <0.05).RVS组6、12个月的LAAEF、LVEF均大于同时点RVA组(P <0.05).结论 采用RT-3DE检测的左心房各节段达最小容积的最大时间差可较时间标准差更敏感地评价右心室不同部位起搏对左心房同步性的影响.持续RVA和RVS起搏均可导致缓慢性心律失常患者左心房收缩运动失同步化,但RVS起搏的不良影响较小.     

Comparative Functional Effects of Chronic Ventricular Demand and Atrial Synchronous Ventricular Inhibited Pacing

We compared the effects of chronic ventricular inhibited (VVI) and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited (VDD) pacing on functional capacity in 8 patients with complete atrioventricular heart block. Permanent VDD (Medtronic #2409, ASVIP) pacemakers were implanted in four men and four women (age range 27-76 years, mean 58.9 +/- 18.4 years), and randomly assigned to a three-month period of VDD or VVI pacing in this single blinded, crossover study. Functional capacity was assessed by questionnaire, graded treadmill exercise testing and radionuclide angiocardiography prior to pacemaker implant and following each pacing period. Following 3 months of pacing in each of VVI and VDD pacing modes, maximum heart rate (83.4 +/- 14 vs 134.9 +/- 16.4 beats/min, p less than 0.001) and double product (147.5 +/- 58.3 vs 218.9 +/- 52.7, p less than .001) were greater with VDD pacing. Although exercise duration on treadmill exercise testing (5.3 +/- 2.9 vs 6.9 +/- 3.1 minutes, p less than 0.1) was greater in the VDD mode, the difference was not significant. Similarly, there was no significant difference in functional capacity as measured by questionnaire scores (50.1 +/- 8.4 vs 46.9 +/- 8.9, p less than 0.1) or in left ventricular ejection fraction for the two pacing modes (.54 vs .55, p less than .5). Only one patient reported a subjective improvement with physiologic (VDD) pacing, whereas the remaining patients stated no preference. We conclude that VDD pacing offers improved maximal cardiac work during exercise compared to VVI pacing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Myocardial Demands of Atrial-Triggered Versus Fixed-Rate Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Complete Heart Block

Hemodynamics, myocardial oxygen consumption, and lactate concentration were determined by cardiac catheterization at rest and during exercise in eight patients treated with AV universal pacemakers (DDD) for high degree AV block. The pulse generator was alternately programmed in ventricular inhibited (VVI) or atrial synchronous (VAT) mode. During VVI pacing, the cardiac output rose between rest and exercise (4.3-7.6 L/min) due to increased stroke volume. VAT pacing gave significantly greater increase (4.5-8.8 L/min) which, as the stroke volume was unchanged, resulted from accelerated heart rate. The myocardial oxygen consumption and the coronary blood flow did not differ between VVI and VAT mode at rest or during exercise, nor did the modes make a difference in arterial systolic and pulmonary wedge pressures. These observations suggested that VAT pacing offers higher cardiac output than VVI pacing, but with similar demands on myocardial oxygen consumption.     

右室间隔部起搏与右室心尖部起搏对患者心功能的影响

目的探讨右室间隔部起搏(right ventricular septum pacing,RVS)与右室心尖部起搏(right ventricular apex pa-cing,RVA)对心功能的影响。方法 45例Ⅲ度或高度房室传导阻滞或病态窦房结综合征行永久起搏器置入患者分为RVA组(24例)与RVS组(21例)。随访术后不同时期超声心动图,监测左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末期内径(LVDd)、左室Tei指数变化。结果 RVA组术后LVEF与术前比较呈逐渐降低趋势,LVDd呈持续增大趋势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RVS组术后LVEF、LVDd与术前比较均无明显变化,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组Tei指数在术后均持续增大,术后1天、12月与24月组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论右室间隔部起搏较右室心尖部起搏对左心功能影响更小。     

The Effects of Rate-Adaptive Atrial Pacing Versus Ventricular Backup Pacing on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background: Atrial rate-adaptive pacing may improve cardiopulmonary reserve in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Methods: A randomized, blinded, single-crossover design enrolled dual-chamber implantable defibrillator recipients without pacing indications and an ejection fraction ≤40% to undergo cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill stress testing in both atrial rate-adaptive pacing (AAIR) and ventricular demand pacing (VVI) pacing modes. The primary endpoint was change in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂). Secondary endpoints were changes in anaerobic threshold, perceived exertion, exercise duration, and peak blood pressure.
Results: Ten patients, nine males, eight with New York Heart Association class I, mean ejection fraction 24 ± 7%, were analyzed. Baseline VO₂ was 3.6 ± 0.5 mL/kg/min. Heart rate at peak exercise was significantly higher during AAIR versus VVI pacing (142 ± 18 vs 130 ± 23 bpm; P = 0.05). However, there was no difference in peak VO₂ (AAIR 23.7 ± 6.1 vs VVI 23.8 ± 6.3 mL/kg/min; P = 0.8), anaerobic threshold (AAIR 1.3 ± 0.3 vs VVI 1.2 ± 0.2 L/min; P = 0.11), rate of perceived exertion (AAIR 7.3 ± 1.5 vs VVI 7.8 ± 1.2; P = 0.46), exercise duration (AAIR 15 minutes, 46 seconds ± 2 minutes, 54 seconds vs VVI 16 minutes, 3 seconds ± 2 minutes, 48 seconds; P = 0.38), or peak systolic blood pressure (AAIR 155 ± 22 vs VVI 153 ± 21; P = 0.61) between the two pacing modes.
Conclusion: In this study, AAIR pacing did not improve peak VO_2, anaerobic threshold, rate of perceived exertion, or exercise duration compared to VVI backup pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and no pacing indications.     

Altered left ventricular contraction pattern during right ventricular pacing: assessment using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography

Background: Chronic right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has been associated with increased risk of heart failure and adverse outcome. The acute effects of RVA pacing on three‐dimensional (3D) ventricular function and mechanical dyssynchrony are not well known. We performed a real‐time 3D echocardiographic (RT3DE) study to assess global and regional left ventricular function during RVA pacing. Methods: Twenty‐six patients with implanted cardiac devices and normal intrinsic atrioventricular conduction were included in the study. RT3DE was performed during intrinsic sinus rhythm and during RVA pacing. Quantification of global and regional left ventricular function was performed offline by time‐volume analysis of 16 myocardial segments. Time to reach minimum regional volume was calculated for each segment as a percentage of the cardiac cycle. The systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) was defined as the standard deviation of these time periods. Longitudinal function was assessed by time‐volume analysis of apical, midventricular, and basal segments. Results: During RVA pacing, a reversed apical‐to‐basal longitudinal contraction sequence was observed in 58% of all patients. RVA pacing was associated with increased left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony (SDI increase from 4.4 ± 2.2% to 6.3 ± 2.4%, P = 0.001) and reduced LV ejection fraction (decrease from 53 ± 13% to 47 ± 14%, P = 0.05). Conclusion: RT3DE assessment of LV function provides evidence that pacing from the RVA results in acute alterations in LV contraction sequence and increased LV dyssynchrony. Further studies are warranted to assess the potential of RT3DE to identify patients who might be at increased risk of pacing‐induced heart failure or who might benefit from alternate‐site or multisite pacing. (PACE 2011; 76–81)     

Effects of pacing rates on global and regional myocardial blood flow

Background: Information is scarce on the effects of right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing on regional and global myocardial blood flow (MBF). The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between pacing rate and both regional and global MBF. Methods: Four patients with exclusive atrial pacing and six patients with exclusive RVA pacing underwent three consecutive H₂¹⁵O positron emission tomography scans at 60, 90, and 130 pulses per minute (ppm). For each pacing rate, regional and global MBF was determined. In all patients, the left ventricular (LV) function was normal. Results: By varying the atrial pacing rate from 60 to 130 ppm, the mean global MBF increased from 0.94 to 1.40 mL/g/min, whereas the mean septal to lateral MBF ratio decreased from 1.09 to 0.83. In ventricular‐paced patients at corresponding rates, the mean global MBF also increased from 1.07 to 1.52 mL/g/min but here the mean septal to lateral MBF ratio increased from 0.83 to 1.0. Conclusions: During both acute atrial and RVA pacing, regional and global MBF increases with higher pacing rates. However, the septal to lateral MBF ratio decreases with atrial pacing and increases with RVA pacing in patients with normal LV function. In RVA pacing, these different rate‐dependent effects on regional MBF can be considered as a favorable factor that helps to understand why in some long‐term paced patients, LV function is preserved. (PACE 2011; 34:587–592)     

DDD versus VVIR Pacing in Patients,Ages 70 and Over,with Complete Heart Block

Background : Dual‐chamber pacing is believed to have an advantage over single‐chamber ventricular pacing. The aim of the study was to determine whether elderly patients with implanted pacemaker for complete atrioventricular block gain significant benefit from dual‐chamber (DDD) compared with single‐chamber ventricular demand (VVIR). Methods : The study was designed as a double‐blind randomized two‐period crossover study—each pacing mode was maintained for 3 months. Thirty patients (eight men, mean age 76.5 ± 4.3 years) with implanted PM were submitted to a standard protocol, which included an interview, functional class assessment, quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, 6‐minute walk test, and transthoracic echocardiographic examinations. QoL was measured by the SF‐36. All these parameters were obtained on DDD mode pacing and VVIR mode pacing. Paired data were compared. Results : QoL was significantly different between the two groups and showed the best values in DDD. Overall, no patient preferred VVIR mode, 18 preferred DDD mode, and 12 expressed no preference. No differences in mean walking distances were observed between patients with single‐chamber and dual‐chamber pacing. VVI pacing elicited marked decrease in left ventricle ejection fraction and significant enlargement of the left atrium. DDD pacing resulted in significant increase of the peak systolic velocities in lateral mitral annulus and septal mitral annulus. Early diastolic velocities on both sides of mitral annulus did not change. Conclusion : In active elderly patients with complete heart block, DDD pacing is associated with improved quality of life and systolic ventricular function compared with VVI pacing. (PACE 2010; 583–589)     

Left ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from right ventricular apical pacing: relevance of baseline assessment

Objectives: Evaluation of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony in patients undergoing short‐term right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing and correlation with baseline echocardiographic and clinical characteristics. Background: RVA pacing causes abnormal ventricular depolarization that may lead to mechanical LV dyssynchrony. The relationships between pacing‐induced LV dyssynchrony and baseline echocardiographic and clinical variables have not been fully clarified. Methods: Tissue Doppler echocardiography was performed in 153 patients before and after RVA pacing. LV dyssynchrony was measured by the time between the shortest and longest electromechanical delays in the five basal LV segments (intra‐LV). The prevalence and degree of LV dyssynchrony after RVA pacing was evaluated in three groups: baseline LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%, 35–55%, and ≥55%. The intrapatient effect of RVA pacing was determined as the percent increase in intra‐LV value (Δintra‐LV%). The pacing‐induced intra‐LV was correlated with baseline variables. Results: The prevalence and degree of LV dyssynchrony after RVA pacing was significantly higher in patients with lower LVEF (P < 0.001). ΔIntra‐LV% was inversely correlated with baseline intra‐LV and LVEF (B =?2.6, B =?4.2, P < 0.001). Baseline intra‐LV and LV end‐systolic volume correlated positively with intra‐LV after RVA pacing (B = 0.49, B = 0.6, P < 0.001), whereas LVEF showed an inverse correlation. Conclusions: The degree of LV dyssynchrony induced by RVA is variable. Patients with higher baseline LV dyssynchrony, more dilated LV, and more depressed LVEF showed a higher degree of LV dyssynchrony during pacing. These findings may assume importance in predicting the risk of heart failure in pacemaker patients.     

Assessment of the Work Capacity and Relationship Between Rate Response and Exercise Tolerance Associated With Activity-Sensing Rate-Responsive Ventricular Pacing

The relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance was studied by measuring the symptom-limited maximum treadmill time (MTT)both during fixed rate VVI pacing and during VVI + activity mode pacing (RRP) in 15 patients (mean age, 73 years) who had received rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers. Their indications were atrioventricular block, sino-atrial block, and atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response. Basic rate was programmed to 60 ppm in both pacing modes; rate response and activity threshold were programmed to 5 and medium, respectively. The order in which the two pacing modes were tested was randomly determined. The MTT was, on average, 29% longer in RRP than in VVI mode with a mean of 12 minutes in VVI and 14.8 minutes in RRP (p less than 0.001). For the subgroup of eight patients with paced-only rhythm the average increase in MTT was 38% with a mean of 9.5 minutes in VVI and 12.8 minutes in RRP (p less than 0.01). Seven patients who showed episodes of spontaneous rhythm, increased their average MTT by 17% (mean in VVI, 14.9 minutes; in RRP, 17.1 minutes; p less than 0.02). During RRP, a significant positive correlation existed between MTT and the increase in heart rate (N = 15; r = 0.83; p less than 0.001). In 12 patients with paced-only rhythm, the pacing rate remained at the programmed basic rate when the patients were lying, sitting, and standing and increased to 86 +/- 4 ppm during casual walking, and to 101 +/- 4 ppm during jumping up and down with the pacemaker programmed to the above-mentioned parameters. The maximum pacing rate during jumping corresponded with the maximum pacing rates measured from Holter recordings during normal daily activities.     

Adequacy of Pacing Rate During Exercise in Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing

Our objective was to determint; the adequate pacing rate during exercise in ventricular pacing by measuring exercise capacity, cardiac output, and sinus node activity. Eighteen patients with complete AV block and an implanted pacemaker underwent cardiopulmonary exercise tests under three randomized pacing rates: fixed rate pacing (VVJ) at 60 beats/min and ventricular rate-responsive pacing (VVIR) programmed to attain a heart rate of about 110 beats/min ar 130 beats/min (VVIR 110 and VVIR 130, respectively) at the end of exercise. Compared with VVI and VVIR 130, VVIR 110 was associated with an increased peak oxygen uptake(VVIR 110:20.3 ± 4.5 vs VVI: 16.9 ± 3.1; P < 0.01; and VVIR 130: 19.0 ± 4.1 mL/min per kg, respectively; P < 0.05) and a higher oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (15.3 ± 2.7, 12.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.01, and 14.6 ± 2.6 mL/min per kg; P < 0.05). The atrial rate during exercise expressed as a percentage of the expected maximal heart rate was lower in VVIR 110 than in VVI or VVIR 130 (VVIR 110: 75.9%± 14.6% vs VVI: 90.6%± 12.8%; P < 0.01; VVIR 110 vs VVIR 130: 89.1%± 23.1%; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at peak exercise between VVIR 110 and VVIR 130. We conclude that a pacing rate for submaximal exercise of 110 beats/min may be preferable to that of 130 beats/min in respect to exercise capacity and sympathetic nerve activity.     

Atrial Synchronized Ventricular Pacing: Contribution of the Chronotropic Response to Improved Exercise Performance

In contrast to asynchronous ventricular pacing (VOO, VVI), alrial synchronized ventricular pacing (VAT, VDD, DDD) maintains the normal sequence of cardiac chamber activation and permits a chronotropic response to exercise. thereby improving exercise performance. To assess the separate contributions of these two factors to improved work capacity. 14 patients with implanted programmable VAT pacemakers were exercised according to the Bruce protocol, in three different pacing modes, selected in a random orderand on a double blind basis: (a) VAT: (b) chest wall stimulation triggered ventricular (V-CWS-T) pacing, during which the pacemaker was programmed to VAT mode but driven externally using chest wall stimulation at rates fractionally above the patients'atrial rate, thereby providing a chronotropic response to exercise without atrioventricular synchronization; and (c) VOO mode at 70 beats per minute. There was a significant improvement in exercise performance in all patients during both VAT and V-CWS-T pacing as compared to VOO mode; the average increase in work capacity being similar: VAT: 44 ± 31, (range, 12 to 140) percent and V-CWS-T; 40 ± 24 (range, 5 to 85) percent. It is concluded that in patients with adaptive pacing systems, the chronotropic response is the major determinant of any improvement in exercise performance.