Effect of cumulative bortezomib dose on survival in multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib‐melphalan‐prednisone in the phase III VISTA study

This analysis, using data from the bortezomib‐melphalan‐prednisone (VMP) arm of the Phase III VISTA study, investigated whether increased cumulative bortezomib dose could improve overall survival (OS) in transplant‐ineligible patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. Median cumulative bortezomib dose received by the 340 patients was 39 mg/m²; this was selected as the cut‐off for defining the dose groups to be compared for OS. Patient characteristics were well balanced between dose groups except for age. OS was significantly longer in the higher (≥39 mg/m²) versus lower (<39 mg/m²) cumulative bortezomib dose group (median 66.3 vs. 46.2 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.533, P < 0.0001; age‐adjusted HR 0.561, P = 0.0002). To overcome confounding effects of early discontinuations/deaths, which were more common in the lower cumulative dose group (27 vs. 4% of patients discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) in the lower and higher cumulative dose groups, respectively), a landmark analysis was conducted at 180 days, eliminating patients who died or discontinued before this time from the analysis. OS from this landmark remained significantly longer in the higher dose group (median 60.4 vs. 50.3 months; HR 0.709, P = 0.0372). Thus, higher cumulative bortezomib dose, reflecting prolonged treatment duration and/or dose intensity, appears associated with improved OS. Approaches to achieve higher cumulative doses could include subcutaneous bortezomib administration, dose/schedule modifications, continuing therapy in responding patients, and proactive AE management. Am. J. Hematol. 90:314–319, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Multiple myeloma: chemotherapy or transplantation in the era of new drugs

Objective: To review the current results of studies incorporating novel agents in multiple myeloma (MM) and discuss the role of autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT) in the era of new active drugs for the treatment of this disease. The outlook for patients with symptomatic MM is changing with the introduction of bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide into the repertoire of available chemotherapeutic agents. Compared with standard chemotherapy, a survival benefit has been reported for the first time in 30 yrs. Methods: Articles published in English between 1969 and 2008 were identified by searching PubMed for ‘myeloma’, ‘diagnosis’, ‘thalidomide’, ‘bortezomib’, ‘lenalidomide’, ‘dexamethasone’, ‘prednisone’, ‘doxorubicin’, ‘cyclophosphamide’, ‘melphalan’, ‘combination chemotherapy’, and ‘autologous transplantation’. Results: In randomized studies, bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide have each been combined with dexamethasone, alkylating agents, or doxorubicin, and such combinations resulted in significant improvement in progression‐free survival. Conclusions: The incorporation of new drugs as induction therapy along with ASCT appears to produce very good partial response rates, slightly superior to those achieved by conventional chemotherapy with new drugs. How to best optimize induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy and how to best select and prepare patients for ASCT are still to be determined. Randomized trials are needed to directly compare the current best chemotherapeutic approach with best ASCT strategies and to guide clinical practice for patients with MM.     

Bortezomib,melphalan, prednisone (VMP) versus melphalan,prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective case‐matched study

Novel agents in combination with melphalan and prednisone (MP) significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM). Randomized trials comparing MP plus bortezomib (VMP) versus MP plus thalidomide (MPT) are lacking. Nine hundred and fifty‐six elderly (>65 years) newly diagnosed MM patients from six European randomized trials were retrospectively analyzed and matched for age, albumin, and beta2‐microglobulin at diagnosis, 296 patients were selected from the VMP groups, and 294 from MPT. Complete response rate was 21% in the VMP patients and 13% in the MPT patients (P = 0.007). After a median follow‐up of 34 months (range, 1–92), VMP significantly prolonged both PFS (median 32.5 vs. 22.9 months, HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52–0.82; P < 0.001) and OS (median 79.7 vs. 45.1 months, HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.32–0.59; P < 0.001) in comparison with MPT. The benefit in terms of OS of the VMP group was quite similar among patients with different risk factors defined by sex, ISS, ECOG performance status, or serum creatinine but not among patients ≥75 years. Multivariate analysis confirmed that VMP was an independent predictor of longer PFS and OS. In a control‐case matched analysis, PFS and OS were prolonged in patients who received VMP in comparison with those treated with MPT. Am. J. Hematol. 89:355–362, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Comprehensive evaluation of the revised international staging system in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents as a primary therapy

The revised International Staging System (R‐ISS) has recently been developed to improve the risk stratification of multiple myeloma (MM) patients over the ISS. We assessed the R‐ISS in MM patients who were treated with novel agents as a primary therapy and evaluated its discriminative power and ability to reclassify patients from the ISS. A total of 514 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with novel agents including thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide as a primary therapy were included in this retrospective analysis. With a median follow‐up duration of 42.3 months (range, 40.5–44.1), the median overall survival (OS) was 61.0 months. There was a significant difference in median OS (not reached, 60.9, and 50.1 months for stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively, P < 0.001) among the three stages of R‐ISS. The C‐statistic was significantly greater for R‐ISS than for ISS (0.769 vs. 0.696, P < 0.001). The event NRI was ?0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], ?0.18–0.01) and the non‐event NRI was 0.05 (95% CI, ?0.03–0.10), resulting in a total NRI of ?0.03 (95% CI, ?0.14–0.08, P = 0.602). The R‐ISS performs well and has significantly better discriminative power than the ISS in MM patients treated with novel agents as a primary therapy. However, it does not better reclassify patients from the ISS, suggesting that there is still room to improve the staging system. Moreover, new statistical measures for assessing and quantifying the risk prediction of new prognostic models are necessary in future studies.     

Overall survival of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients after adjusting for crossover in the MM‐003 trial for pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone

In the phase III MM‐003 trial, pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone (POM+LoDEX) improved overall survival (OS) versus high‐dose dexamethasone (HiDEX) in 455 patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide. Here, a two‐stage Weibull method was used to adjust for the crossover of patients in the HiDEX arm to pomalidomide‐based therapy. The adjusted difference in median OS between patients in the POM+LoDEX and HiDEX arms was 7·0 months (12·7 vs. 5·7 months, respectively). These findings provide important evidence for understanding the clinical efficacy of pomalidomide on OS benefits seen in RRMM patients.     

Total therapy 2 without thalidomide in comparison with total therapy 1: role of intensified induction and posttransplantation consolidation therapies

Patients with myeloma, treated on the thalidomide arm of total therapy 2 (TT2), had a higher complete response (CR) rate and improved event-free survival (EFS) but not overall survival (OS). To evaluate the benefit of TT2's posttandem autotransplant consolidation chemotherapy and dexamethasone maintenance, outcomes were compared on TT2 without thalidomide (n = 345; median follow-up, 3.5 years) and on predecessor trial TT1 (n = 231; median follow-up, 11.5 years). CR rates were similar (43% vs 41%); however, 5-year estimates of continuous CR (45% vs 32%, P < .001) and 5-year EFS (43% vs 28%, P < .001) were superior with TT2, with a trend for improved OS (62% vs 57%; P = .11). OS was also superior among patients achieving CR and receiving the second transplantation early after the first transplantation. Superior EFS and OS with TT2 versus TT1 was noted in the two thirds presenting without cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs); 4-year posttandem transplantation OS for patients with CAs was 47% with TT1 and 76% with TT2 when combination chemotherapy rather than DEX was applied for consolidation (P = .040). Thus, TT2 (without thalidomide) improved OS of patients without CAs; those with CAs benefited from posttransplantation consolidation chemotherapy. The favorable effects of CR and rapidly sequenced second transplantation attest to the validity of a melphalan dose-response effect in myeloma.     

Prognostic significance of plasma cell propidium iodide and annexin-V indices and their mutual ratio in multiple myeloma

The aim of this study was a contemporaneous measurement of plasma cells proliferative and apoptotic activity in patients examined at the time of multiple myeloma (MM) diagnosis before initiation of chemotherapy, focussed on the following aspects: determination of prognostic significance of plasma cell propidium iodide (PC-PI) and annexin-V FITC (PC-AI) indices; optimal cut off of PC-PI and PC-AI with regard to overall survival; calculation of summary kinetic index of plasma cells (PC-PI/AI ratio) for evaluation of its prognostic importance; determination of an index (out of PC-PI, PC-AI and PC-PI/AI) showing the closest relation to prognosis of multiple myeloma. The analyzed 122 patients fulfilling SWOG multiple myeloma criteria were treated by conventional chemotherapy. Plasma cell proliferative activity was measured by means of PC-PI examined by flow cytometry using a DNA/CD138 double staining technique. For detection of plasma cells entering apoptosis (PC-AI), flow-cytometry method with annexin-V FITC and MoAb CD138 was used. The PC-PI median in 122 patients was 2.6(0.4-4.8)%. The sequence prognostic analysis showed that the optimal PC-PI cut off was 2.9% and displayed a significant relationship with overall survival (OS) (p=0.031). The group of 94 patients had PC-AI median of 5.0(1.4-24.5)%. The best statistical significance of the rate of apoptosis related to overall survival was found at cut off value of 4.4% (p=0.022). The median of overall kinetic index of plasma cells (PC-PI/AI) examined in 94 MM patients was 0.5(0.05-2.60) and the overall kinetic index was found to display a very good relationship to OS at the cut off value of 0.71 (p=0.032). All the three indices expressing various aspects of kinetics of plasma cells allow the stratification of patients into two prognostically different groups with statistically significantly different medians of overall survival: good risk - OS still undeterminable at the time of analysis; bad risk - M: OS was for PC-PI 17 months, for PC-AI 23 months and for PC-PI/AI 16 months. The ratio of both indices, i.e. PC- PI/AI, however did not bring any further contribution to overall survival/prognosis evaluation, when compared with single PC-PI and PC-AI. Results of present study indicates that the evaluation of both proliferation and apoptotic activities of plasma cells is important for prognosis thus extending possibilities of initial stratification of MMpatients into groups with different prognostic risk.     

Clinical efficacy of a bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (Vel-CTD) regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase II study

The clinical efficacy and safety of a four-drug combination of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone was assessed for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Seventy patients received at least two cycles of treatment with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m² orally on days 1–4; thalidomide 50 mg/day orally every day; and dexamethasone 20 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. The overall best response rate was 88%, with 46% complete response, 9% very good partial response, and 33% partial response. After a median follow-up of 12.6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.6 months with a 3-year PFS of 14% and the median overall survival (OS) was 31.6 months with a 3-year OS of 47%. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (12%), neutropenia (4%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (3%), with thrombosis being very rare (<1%). Bortezomib combined with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone is a highly effective salvage therapy with manageable toxicity for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.     

Phase II study of bortezomib,cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone as induction therapy in multiple myeloma: DSMM XI trial

We assessed the safety and efficacy of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) induction therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. A total of 414 patients received three 21‐day cycles of VCD prior to autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT). Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were leucopenia (31·4%) and thrombocytopenia (6·8%). The overall response rate (ORR) by investigator‐based assessment was 85·4%. Most patients (74%) underwent successful central laboratory‐based molecular cytogenetic analysis. No clinically relevant differences in ORR post‐induction were seen between patients with or without high‐risk cytogenetic abnormalities (86·2% vs. 84·3%). Further follow‐up data are available for 113 patients receiving ASCT who were included in a prospective consolidation trial (median follow‐up, 55·5 months); median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 35·3 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. In patients with high‐risk versus standard‐risk cytogenetics, median PFS was 19·9 vs. 43·6 months (P < 0·0001), and median OS was 54·7 months versus not reached (P = 0·0022). VCD is an effective and tolerable induction regimen; results suggest that VCD induces high response rates independently of cytogenetic risk status, but after long‐term follow‐up, cytogenetic high risk is associated with markedly reduced PFS and OS post‐ASCT.     

Improved survival in myeloma patients: starting to close in on the gap between elderly patients and a matched normal population

The outcome for multiple myeloma patients has improved since the introduction of bortezomib, thalidomide and lenalidomide. However, studies comparing new and conventional treatment include selected patient groups. We investigated consecutive patients (n = 1638) diagnosed in a defined period and compared survival with a gender‐ and age‐matched cohort Swedish population (n = 9 340 682). Median overall survival for non‐high‐dose treated patients was 2·8 years. The use of bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide in first line therapy predicted a significantly longer overall survival (median 4·9 years) compared to conventional treatment (2·3 years). Among non‐high‐dose treated patients receiving at least 2 lines with bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide, 69% and 63% have survived at 3 and 5 years as compared to 48% and 22% with conventional drugs and 88% and 79% in the matched cohort populations, respectively. The median overall survival in high‐dose treated patients was 6·9 years. Of these patients, 84% survived at 3 years and 70% at 5 years as compared to 98% and 95% in the matched cohort population. Overall survival in the best non‐high‐dose treated outcome group is closing the gap with the matched cohort. Upfront use of new drugs is clearly better than waiting until later lines of treatment.     

Lenalidomide before and after autologous stem cell transplantation for transplant-eligible patients of all ages in the randomized,phase III,Myeloma XI trial

The optimal way to use immunomodulatory drugs as components of induction and maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma is unresolved. We addressed this question in a large phase III randomized trial, Myeloma XI. Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (n=2,042) were randomized to induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) or cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRD). Additional intensification therapy with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CVD) was administered before autologous stem-cell transplantation to patients with a suboptimal response to induction therapy using a response-adapted approach. After receiving high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation, eligible patients were further randomized to receive either lenalidomide alone or observation alone. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The CRD regimen was associated with significantly longer PFS (median: 36 vs. 33 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96; P=0.0116) and OS (3-year OS: 82.9% vs. 77.0%; HR, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63-0.93; P=0.0072) compared with CTD. The PFS and OS results favored CRD over CTD across all subgroups, including patients with International Staging System stage III disease (HR for PFS, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.93; HR for OS, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.56-1.09), high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43-0.84; HR for OS, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.42-1.15) and ultra-high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.67; 95% CI: 0.41-1.11; HR for OS, 0.65; 95% CI: 0.34-1.25). Among patients randomized to lenalidomide maintenance (n=451) or observation (n=377), maintenance therapy improved PFS (median: 50 vs. 28 months; HR, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.37-0.60; P<0.0001). Optimal results for PFS and OS were achieved in the patients who received CRD induction and lenalidomide maintenance. The trial was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2009-010956-93) and ISRCTN49407852.     

Bortezomib plus intermediate‐dose dexamethasone and thalidomide in elderly untreated patients with multiple myeloma: A Chinese experience

Bortezomib has proven to be active in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), including elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib in combination with intermediate‐dose dexamethasone (Dex) and thalidomide in untreated MM patients aged ≥65 years in a Chinese single center. In this study, 18 patients were treated with bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and Dex at 20 mg/day IV on Days 1–4 and 8–11 simultaneously. Thalidomide at dose of 100 mg/day was given everyday. The mean number of cycles of bortezomib treatment was 2.06. Three patients (17%) achieved a complete response (CR), four (22%) a very good partial response (VGPR), and nine (50%) a PR, resulting in an overall response rate of 89%. The median time to response was 22 days (range 14–50 days). The duration of response was significantly longer in patients achieving a CR/VGPR with respect to those achieving only a PR (8.5 vs. 4.2 months, P = 0.03). Grade 3–4 toxicities occurring in patients comprised weakness, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, infection, and neuropathy. Only one patient suffered from deep vein thrombosis. This preliminary experience in Chinese patients indicated that bortezomib‐Dex‐thalidomide is highly effective in elderly untreated patients with MM, even in patients with poor prognostic features. Am. J. Hematol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A phase 2, randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled study of siltuximab (anti‐IL‐6 mAb) and bortezomib versus bortezomib alone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

We compared the safety and efficacy of siltuximab (S), an anti‐interleukin‐6 chimeric monoclonal antibody, plus bortezomib (B) with placebo (plc) + B in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in a randomized phase 2 study. Siltuximab was given by 6 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. On progression, B was discontinued and high‐dose dexamethasone could be added to S/plc. Response and progression‐free survival (PFS) were analyzed pre‐dexamethasone by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. For the 281 randomized patients, median PFS for S + B and plc + B was 8.0 and 7.6 months (HR 0.869, P = 0.345), overall response rate was 55 versus 47% (P = 0.213), complete response rate was 11 versus 7%, and median overall survival (OS) was 30.8 versus 36.8 months (HR 1.353, P = 0.103). Sustained suppression of C‐reactive protein, a marker reflective of inhibition of interleukin‐6 activity, was seen with S + B. Siltuximab did not affect B pharmacokinetics. Siltuximab/placebo discontinuation (75 versus 66%), grade ≥3 neutropenia (49 versus 29%), thrombocytopenia (48 versus 34%), and all‐grade infections (62 versus 49%) occurred more frequently with S + B. The addition of siltuximab to bortezomib did not appear to improve PFS or OS despite a numerical increase in response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Am. J. Hematol. 90:42–49, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Thalidomide and dexamethasone vs. bortezomib and dexamethasone for melphalan refractory myeloma: a randomized study

Objectives: Thalidomide and bortezomib have been frequently used for second‐line therapy in patients with myeloma relapsing after or refractory to initial melphalan‐based treatment, but no randomized trials have been published comparing these two treatment alternatives. Methods: Thalidomide‐ and bortezomib‐naïve patients with melphalan refractory myeloma were randomly assigned to low‐dose thalidomide + dexamethasone (Thal‐Dex) or bortezomib + dexamethasone (Bort‐Dex). At progression on either therapy, the patients were offered crossover to the alternative drug combination. An estimated 300 patients would be needed for the trial to detect a 50% difference in median PFS between the treatment arms. Results: After inclusion of 131 patients, the trial was prematurely closed because of low accrual. Sixty‐seven patients were randomized to Thal‐Dex and 64 to Bort‐Dex. Progression‐free survival was similar (median, 9.0 months for Thal‐Dex and 7.2 for Bort‐Dex). Response rate was similar (55% for Thal‐Dex and 63% for Bort‐Dex), but time to response was shorter (P < 0.05) and the VGPR rate higher (P < 0.01) for Bort‐Dex. Time‐to‐other treatment after crossover was similar (median, 13.2 months for Thal‐Dex and 11.2 months for Bort‐Dex), as was overall survival (22.8 months for Thal‐Dex and 19.0 for Bort‐Dex). Venous thromboembolism was seen in seven patients and cerebrovascular events in four patients in the Thal‐Dex group. Severe neuropathy, reactivation of herpes virus infections, and mental depression were more frequently observed in the Bort‐Dex group. In the quality‐of‐life analysis, no difference was noted for physical function, pain, and global quality of life. Fatigue and sleep disturbances were significantly more prevalent in the Bort‐Dex group. Conclusions: Thalidomide (50–100 mg daily) in combination with dexamethasone seems to have an efficacy comparable with that of bortezomib and dexamethasone in melphalan refractory myeloma. However, the statistical strength of the results in this study is limited by the low number of included patients.     

Thalidomide plus dexamethasone as a maintenance therapy after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation improves progression-free survival in multiple myeloma

Despite the good response of stem cell transplant (SCT) in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), most patients relapse or do not achieve complete remission, suggesting that additional treatment is needed. We assessed the impact of thalidomide in maintenance after SCT in untreated patients with MM. A hundred and eight patients (<70 years old) were randomized to receive maintenance with dexamethasone (arm A; n = 52) or dexamethasone with thalidomide (arm B; n = 56; 200 mg daily) for 12 months or until disease progression. After a median follow‐up of 27 months, an intention to treat analysis showed a 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) of 30% in arm A (95% CI 22–38) and 64% in arm B (95% CI 57–71; P = 0.002), with median PFS of 19 months and 36 months, respectively. In patients who did not achieve at least a very good partial response, the PFS at 2 years was significantly higher when in use of thalidomide (19 vs. 59%; P = 0.002). Overall survival at 2 years was not significantly improved (70 vs. 85% in arm A and arm B, respectively; P = 0.27). The addition of thalidomide to dexamethasone as maintenance improved the PFS mainly in patients who did not respond to treatment after SCT. Am. J. Hematol. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Thalidomide in consecutive multiple myeloma patients: single-center analysis on practical aspects, efficacy, side effects and prognostic factors with lower thalidomide doses

Purpose: In this single‐center analysis, we assessed whether lower thalidomide doses are feasible and result in favourable treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Results: Between May 2001 and October 2006, 38 consecutive MM patients received thalidomide. Their median age was 62.4 yr, all had stage II/III MM and 31.6% had deletion 13q14 (del13q14). Prior to thalidomide, patients had received a median of two treatment lines. The median thalidomide dose was 100 mg/d (range 50–800) and the median treatment duration was 34 wk. The median cumulative thalidomide dose was 24 g. Sixteen patients received thalidomide as a single agent and 22 in combination (+dexamethasone n = 18; others n = 4). The median time‐to‐treatment failure (TTF) after thalidomide initiation was 30.4 wk. Analysis of prognostic factors showed a significantly prolonged TTF without del13q14 (38.1 vs. 8.9 wk with del13q14; P = 0.006). Our analysis of TTF between thalidomide given alone vs. in combinations showed a better TTF for the combination (23.6 vs. 30.6 wk), albeit not reaching significance (P = 0.20). Other parameters, such as age, stage, and prior SCT showed no difference in TTF. Peripheral polyneuropathy (PNP) frequencies were increased with longer (>28 wk) and increased cumulative thalidomide doses (>40 g), which emphasizes (a) the need to carefully escalate thalidomide from 50 to 200 mg/d, thereby reducing side effects and increasing patient compliance, and (b) that PNP occurs more frequently with longer and higher thalidomide doses. Conclusion: The strategy to lower thalidomide doses seems a feasible and attractive approach in MM patients, this being currently tested in prospective randomized trials.     

The relationship between quality of response and clinical benefit for patients treated on the bortezomib arm of the international, randomized, phase 3 APEX trial in relapsed multiple myeloma

Quality of response is associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. This cohort study within the phase 3 Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions (APEX) trial of bortezomib versus dexamethasone in relapsed myeloma assessed the relationship between quality of response to bortezomib (n = 315) and clinical benefit. Treatment-free interval (TFI), time to alternative therapy (TTAT), time to progression (TTP) and OS were assessed in response-evaluable patients in the bortezomib arm in cohorts defined by achievement of complete response (CR; n = 27), very good partial response (VGPR; n = 31), partial response (PR; n = 77), minimal response (MR; n = 21) or non-response (NR, including stable and progressive disease; n = 159). CR was associated with significantly longer median TFI (24.1 vs. 6.9/6.4 months) and TTAT (27.1 vs. 13.6/14 months) versus VGPR/PR. Median TTP was similar in CR, VGPR and PR cohorts; median OS was not reached. Patients achieving MR appeared to have prolonged median TFI (3.8 vs. 2.3 months), TTAT (8.7 vs. 6.2 months), TTP (4.9 vs. 2.8 months) and OS (24.9 vs. 18.7 months) versus NR. In conclusion, bortezomib had substantial activity in relapsed myeloma patients; CR may be a surrogate marker for significant clinical benefit with bortezomib. MR appeared to be valid as a separate response category in this setting.     

Long‐term outcome after allogeneic stem‐cell transplantation with reduced‐intensity conditioning in patients with multiple myeloma

This study examines the long‐term outcomes of a cohort of patients with myeloma who were treated with reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens after a minimum follow‐up of 5 years at our centre. A total of 53 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation (Allo‐SCT) between January 2000 and January 2007 were identified. The median follow‐up of living patients was 84 months (51–141). The median age of the MM patients was 50 (28–70) years. Fifty‐one patients (96%) received a transplant from a sibling donor. The median time between diagnosis and Allo‐SCT was 34 months (6–161), and the median time between auto‐SCT and Allo‐SCT was 10 months (1–89). Fifty‐one patients (96%) received at least one auto‐SCT; 24 patients (45%) received a tandem auto‐Allo‐SCT. At last follow‐up, 21 patients (40%) are alive > 5 years post RIC Allo‐SCT. At last follow‐up, 14 (26%) are in first complete remission (CR), and four patients (8%) in second CR after donor lymphocyte infusion or re‐induction with one of the new anti‐myeloma drugs (bortezomib or lenalidomide) after Allo‐SCT. Eight patients (38%) among these long survivors received one of these new drugs as induction or relapse treatment before Allo‐SCT. Disease status and occurrence of cGvHD were significantly associated with progression‐free survival (PFS); hazard ratio (HR) = 0.62 (0.30–1.29, P = 0.20). Acute GvHD was correlated with higher transplant‐related mortality; HR = 4.19 (1.05–16.77, P = 0.04). No variables were associated with overall survival (OS). In conclusion, we observe that long‐term disease control can be expected in a subset of MM patients undergoing RIC Allo‐SCT. After 10 years, the OS and PFS were 32% and 24%, respectively. The PFS curve after Allo‐SCT stabilizes in time with a plateau after 6 years post Allo‐SCT. Am. J. Hematol. 88:370–374, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Outcome according to cytogenetic abnormalities and DNA ploidy in myeloma patients receiving short induction with weekly bortezomib followed by maintenance

Cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) such as t(4;14), t(14;16) or del(17p), and nonhyperdiploidy are associated with poor prognosis in multiple myeloma. We evaluated the influence of CAs by FISH and DNA ploidy by flow cytometry on response and survival in 232 elderly, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving an induction with weekly bortezomib followed by maintenance therapy with bortezomib-based combinations. Response was similar in the high-risk and standard-risk CA groups, both after induction (21% vs 27% complete responses [CRs]) and maintenance (39% vs 45% CR). However, high-risk patients showed shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than standard-risk patients, both from the first (24 vs 33 months; P = .04) and second randomization (17 vs 27 months; P = .01). This also translated into shorter overall survival (OS) for high-risk patients (3-year OS: 55% vs 77%; P = .001). This adverse prognosis applied to either t(4;14) or del(17p). Concerning DNA ploidy, hyperdiploid patients showed longer OS than nonhyperdiploid patients (77% vs 63% at 3 years; P = .04), and this was more evident in patients treated with bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone (77% vs 53% at 3 years; P = .02). The present schema does not overcome the negative prognosis of high-risk CAs and nonhyperdiploidy. This trial was registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00443235.     

Reduction in C‐reactive protein indicates successful targeting of the IL‐1/IL‐6 axis resulting in improved survival in early stage multiple myeloma

We report the long‐term follow‐up results of a phase II trial of IL‐1 receptor antagonist and low‐dose dexamethasone for early stage multiple myeloma (MM). Patients were eligible if they had smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) or indolent multiple myeloma (IMM) without the need for immediate therapy. Forty seven patients were enrolled and subsequently treated with IL‐1Ra; in 25/47 low‐dose dexamethasone (20 mg weekly) was added. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). In the clinical trial, three patients achieved a minor response (MR) to IL‐1Ra alone; five patients a partial response (PR) and four patients an MR after addition of dexamethasone. Seven patients showed a decrease in the plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) which paralleled a decrease in the high sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP). The median PFS for the 47 patients was 1116 days (37.2 months). The median PFS for patients without (n = 22) and with (n = 25) a decrease in their baseline hs‐CRP was 326 days (11 months) vs. 3139 days (104 months) respectively (P <0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) for the 47 patients was 3482 days (9.5 years). The median OS for patients without and with a decrease in their baseline hs‐CRP was 2885 days (7.9 years) vs. median not reached, respectively (P = 0.001). In SMM/IMM patients at risk for progression to active myeloma, reduction in the hs‐CRP indicates successful targeting of the IL‐1/IL‐6 axis resulting in improved PFS and OS. (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00635154) Am. J. Hematol. 91:571–574, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.