Comparison of the effects of sodium pentosanpolysulfate and unfractionated heparin on venous thrombosis; an experimental study in rats.

Sodium pentosanpolysulfate (Fibrezym) and unfractionated heparin (Liquemin) had significant antithrombotic efficacy in rats. 1 mg/kg body weight (BW) FibrezymR had its maximal effect 2-4 hours after subcutaneous administration; 200 U/kg BW LiqueminR s.c. were most effective 4-6 hours after application. Both drugs caused frequent embolic break-offs of thrombi during the time periods of maximal antithrombotic efficiency.     

Effects of heparin, dermatan sulfate and of their association on the inhibition of venous thrombosis growth in the rabbit.

This study compares the ability of unfractionated heparin, of dermatan sulfate, and of their simultaneous administration delivered as continuous intravenous infusion or as a single bolus injection to inhibit the growth of a standardized venous thrombosis in the rabbit. When delivered as continuous intravenous infusion for 4 h, heparin and dermatan sulfate inhibited thrombus growth in a dose dependent manner. The maximum antithrombotic effect of heparin was achieved at the dose of 0.15 mg kg-1 h-1 (25 U kg-1 h-1) which generated a mean plasma concentration of 1.8 micrograms ml-1 (0.31 U ml-1) and a 1.8 fold prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in comparison to the pretreatment value. A comparable antithrombotic effect was obtained with dermatan sulfate at the dose of 2 mg kg-1 h-1. This dose generated a mean plasma concentration of 30 micrograms ml-1 and a 1.3 fold APTT prolongation. Increasing these doses up to 10 fold did not improve the antithrombotic effect which did not overpass 60-70% of the controls. When the compounds were delivered simultaneously, the maximum antithrombotic effect (64%) was obtained with the following association: 0.06 mg kg-1 h-1 (10 U kg-1 h-1) for heparin and 1 mg kg-1 h-1 for dermatan sulfate. Increasing these doses up to 4 to 5 fold did not improve the antithrombotic effect. Heparin, dermatan sulfate and the association of both were also delivered as single bolus injections and the resultant antithrombotic effect was determined 4 h after saline infusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin in the treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

Objective:

To compare the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), and to provide an appropriate treatment option in these patients.

Method:

This is a randomized double blind clinical trial conducted between December 2013 and December 2014. The subjects were selected among patients referred to Neurology Department, Imam Reza Hospital; affiliated to Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. Fifty-two cases of CVST were included in this study and randomly divided into 2 groups. Twenty-six cases received LMWH and the other 26 cases received UFH. The primary outcomes include hospital mortality rate and neurologic deficits as assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The secondary end point was disability as measured by the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS).

Results:

We observed the rate of mortality and neurological deficits and disability based on NIHSS, and the MRS did not differ between the 2 groups.

Conclusion:

The efficacy of LMWH and UFH in reduction of neurologic deficit and functional disability in patients with CVST are similar.Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is an uncommon stroke that, unlike arterial stroke, occurs mostly in adolescent and young children.1,2 The outcome of patients with CVST is variable from complete recovery to persistent neurological damage.3 Regardless of the fact that most patients have a complete or partial recovery, 10% are observe to have persistent neurological damage by 12 months of follow-up.3 According to information from clinical trials and observational studies, anticoagulation is advised as safe and effective treatment for cerebral venous thrombosis.3-5 Anticoagulants can also prevent pulmonary embolism, which makes sinus thrombosis is highly complicated.4-7 However, there is no agreement on what type of heparin to use: low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH).7,8 The advantage of using UFH is that it acts rapidly due to inhibition of IIa factor, and its effects are reversible by administering protamine sulfate; however, binding to plasma proteins, platelet (platelet factor 4), macrophages, and endothelial cells limit its bioavailability and account for the highly variable anticoagulant response and requires dose adjustments based on activated partial-thromboplastin time values.8,9 The clinical benefits of LMWH comprise higher bioavailability more predictable pharmacokinetic profile, dose-dependent plasma levels, a longer half-life, the lower risk of bleeding and immune-mediated thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced osteoporosis.8,9 Because of these clinical advantages, LMWHs have gradually replaced UFH for most indications. Several clinical trials, in patients with deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism indicates that LMWH is as effective as UFH and associated with the fewest hemorrhagic complications.8,10 There are already limited data directly comparing LMWH with UFH in CVST patients. It is critical for the clinician to understand which drugs are most effective and associated with the fewest adverse events. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of these 2 types of heparins in the treatment of patients with CVST to provide an appropriate treatment option in such patients.     

Fixed-dose,body weight-independent subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin Certoparin compared with adjusted-dose intravenous unfractionated heparin in patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis

Subcutaneous body weight-adjusted low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been proven as effective and safe as intravenous aPTT-adjusted unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of patients with acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT). In this study we evaluate the efficacy of the initial treatment of proximal DVT with a fixed-dose, body weight-independent application of the LMWH Certoparin with a six month follow-up. In a prospective, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled study 1220 patients with objectively diagnosed proximal DVT were randomly assigned to subcutaneous 8000 U anti-factor Xa of Certoparin twice daily for 10 to 14 days or intravenous aPTT-adjusted UFH for 5 to 8 days. Both regimen were followed by oral anticoagulation for 6 months. The primary end point was the rate of symptomatic and objectively confirmed thromboembolic events within 6 months. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Certoparin regimen as compared to UFH. The per-protocol analysis revealed 22 (3.8%) thromboembolic events in the Certoparin group and 24 (4.3%) in patients assigned to UFH within 6 months, thereby proving the non-inferiority (p<0.01), confirmed by intent-to-treat analysis (p<0.001). Major bleeding occurred in 6 and 7 patients started on Certoparin or UFH during the treatment period. Thromboembolic events were equally distributed in body weight categories with < 50, 50-80 and >80 kg as followed: 0, 3.6% and 4.1% of patients for the Certoparin group and 0, 4.6% and 4.2% of patients for the UFH group. The same was true for major bleeding complications with 0, 2.9% and 1.5% for Certoparin and 0, 3.5% and 4.2% for UFH. Overall mortality was 1.9% in the Certoparin group and 2.7% in the UFH group. Fixed-dose body weight-independent subcutaneous LMWH Certoparin is at least as efficacious and safe as intravenous aPTT-adjusted UFH for the initial treatment of acute proximal DVT. This effect is maintained during a 6-months follow-up of treatment with oral anticoagulation.     

Prevention of postoperative venous thrombosis: a randomized trial comparing unfractionated heparin with low molecular weight heparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement

A double blind randomized trial comparing subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) with standard unfractionated calcium heparin administered at a dose of 5,000 units every 8 hours in patients undergoing elective hip replacement has been performed. Treatment regimens began 12 hours preoperatively with enoxaparin, 2 hours preoperatively with standard unfractionated calcium heparin, and were continued for 15 days or until discharge. Venography was performed in all patients. Two hundred thirty-seven patients were included in the study: 113 received unfractionated heparin and 124 received enoxaparin. The incidence of proximal deep vein thrombosis was reduced from 18.5% in the unfractionated heparin group to 7.5% in the enoxaparin group (p = 0.014), and the incidence of total deep vein thrombosis was similarly reduced from 25% to 12.5% (p = 0.03). There were two major bleeding episodes and one minor bleed in the enoxaparin group compared to two minor bleeds in the unfractionated heparin group. Patients who received enoxaparin required fewer red blood cell transfusions and had a significantly higher hemoglobin on postoperative days 3 and 4. Thus prophylaxis with enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, is simple, safe and more effective than standard low dose unfractionated heparin in preventing deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip replacement.     

Fixed-dose, body weight-independent subcutaneous LMW heparin versus adjusted dose unfractionated intravenous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. EASTERN Investigators

BACKGROUND: Body weight-adjusted subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been proven to be at least as effective and safe as dose-adjusted intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. However, body weight-adjusted dosage of low-molecular-weight heparin may be cumbersome and could lead possibly to incorrect dosing. Therefore a fixed LMWH dose, independent of body-weight, might rationalize initial treatment for venous thromboembolism. METHODS: Patients with proven proximal deep-vein thrombosis were randomly assigned to fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH Certoparin (8,000 anti-factor Xa U b.i.d.; 265 patients) or to adjusted dose i.v. UFH (273 patients) for 12 days. Vitamin K antagonists were started between day 3 and 7 and continued for up to 6 months. The primary outcome measure was a 30 percent or greater improvement in the Marder Score, as revealed by repeated venography on day 12 (end of the initial treatment). The secondary composite outcome measure included death, recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding and was assessed at day 12 and after 6 months by a blinded adjunction committee. RESULTS: The Marder score improved by 30% or more in 30.3% and 25.0% of patients assigned to LMWH (198 paired venograms) and UFH (192 paired venograms), respectively (2p = 0.26). At the end of the initial treatment, the composite outcome was observed in 4 of the 265 patients (1.5%) randomized to LMWH, as compared with 14 of the 273 patients (5.1%) randomized to UFH (2p = 0.03). At 6 months these figures were 6.8% and 12.8%, respectively (risk reduction 0.53, confidence interval 0.31-0.90, 2p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH certoparin is at least as efficacious as UFH in resolving proximal vein thrombosis.     

Long-term clinical follow-up in 265 patients with deep venous thrombosis initially treated with either unfractionated heparin or dalteparin: a retrospective analysis.

The primary objective of this retrospective study was to describe the frequency of a post-thrombotic syndrome in 265 patients previously treated for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The secondary objectives were to document the frequency of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and mortality, especially from malignant disease. The patients were evaluated 5-14 years after inclusion in three randomized trials comparing continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH) (n = 85) with a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), dalteparin (n = 180). The median post-thrombotic score at follow-up was 2 (range 0-8). In a multiple step-wise regression analysis the postthrombotic score was significantly higher among patients with initial proximal DVT (p = 0.0001) as compared with those who had distal DVT. A recurrent venous thromboembolic event was diagnosed in 29.4% of the patients treated with dalteparin and in 23.5% of the patients treated with UFH (ns). A secondary risk factor for venous thromboembolism and a longer duration of treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAC) were significantly associated with a lower risk for recurrent VTE, whereas malignant disease diagnosed during follow-up was associated with a higher risk. During follow-up a total of 40.7% of patients had died. No difference in total mortality or mortality from malignant disease was demonstrated between the two drugs. In conclusion, a severe post-thrombotic syndrome occured relatively infrequent. considering the long observation period. Proximal DVT was significantly associated with a more severe post-thrombotic syndrome. After 14 years follow-up, no significant differences were observed in overall mortality, mortality from malignant disease or recurrent VTE between UFH- and dalteparin-treated patients. Malignant disease was a risk factor for recurrent VTE, the presence of a secondary risk factor and a longer duration of treatment with OAC decreased the risk for recurrent VTE.     

Effect on primary haemostasis of prophylactic regimens of low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, dextran and their combinations. An animal experimental study.

The aim of the study was to determine whether an impairment of the haemostasis could be observed experimentally when thromboprophylactic substances, which act differently on the haemostatic mechanism, were given single or in combination in prophylactic doses. In 36 rabbits we measured the primary haemostatic plug formation time (PHT), rebleedings and total haemostatic plug formation time (THT) after transection of venules and arterioles using an intravital microscope. We combined unfractionated heparin (UH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in low dose with either dextran 70 or polygeline (placebo volume expander) in a randomized double-dummy set up. In the placebo group (NaCl and polygeline) the median PHT was 55 and 101 seconds for arterioles and venules respectively, which are well-comparable to earlier results from our group. Most prolonged PHT and THT for arterioles were seen for dextran+NaCl, actually less prolongation was seen for UH+dextran. We did not observe any differences, except for a prolongation of THT for venules in rabbits given dextran+NaCl (p less than 0.05). Thus, in thromboprophylactic doses used, there does not seem to be an impaired or additive effect between heparins and dextran 70 in primary haemostasis in rabbits.     

Prevention of central venous line-related thrombosis by continuous infusion of low-dose unfractionated heparin, in patients with haemato-oncological disease. A randomized controlled trial

We have conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the role of low-dose unfractionated heparin prophylaxis in preventing central venous line-related thrombosis in patients with haemato-oncological disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either prophylactic intravenous unfractionated heparin (continuous infusion of 100 IU/kg/daily) or 50 ml/daily of normal saline solution as a continuous infusion. CVLs were externalized, non tunneled, double lumen catheters. All CVLs were placed percutaneously by the same physician in the subclavian vein. Upper limb veins were systematically examined by ultrasonography just before, or <24 hours after, catheter removal, and in case of clinical signs of thrombosis. One hundred and twenty-eight CVLs were inserted. Catheter-related thrombosis occurred in 1.5% of the catheters inserted in patients of the heparin group, and in 12.6% in the control group (p = 0.03). No other risk factors were found for the development of catheter-related thrombosis. Two and three patients experienced severe bleeding in the heparin group, and in the control group, respectively (p = 0.18). There were no other side-effects clearly ascribable to the use of unfractionated heparin. This is the first prospective, randomized study, which shows that low-dose of unfractionated heparin is safe and effective to prevent catheter-related thrombosis in patients with haemato-oncological disease.     

Low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin in thrombosis prophylaxis: meta-analysis based on original patient data

A meta-analysis (MA) based on original patient data has been performed comparing low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in thrombosis prophylaxis after major surgical interventions. The analyses have been done for the following prespecified groups of studies: all studies, studies in orthopaedic surgery (OS) and studies in general surgery (GS, with further separation into low-dose studies [GS-LD] and high-dose studies [GS-HD]). Deep vein thrombosis (DVT, all locations) and wound haematoma were used as primary endpoints for efficacy and safety, respectively. The analysis confirms the results of previous publication-based meta-analyses. In GS there is no relevant difference between LMWH and UFH regarding efficacy; the safety results strongly depend on the dosage: under low-dose LMWH the risk of wound haematoma is significantly lower, under high-dose LMWH it is significantly higher than under UFH. However, most of the studies in the last group used regimens of LMWH that are not considered appropriate any more. In OS there is a trend towards a better efficacy and safety of LMWH. In addition, LMWHs are superior to UFH, in OS, with respect to the secondary endpoints proximal DVT and pulmonary embolism. The rates of proximal DVT and pulmonary embolism, respectively, are consistently lower under LMWH than under UFH, whereas slightly smaller rates of distal DVT are observed under UFH.     

Effect of aspirin-dipyridamole and heparin and their combination on venous thrombosis in hypercoagulable or thrombotic animals

Epsilon-amino-caproic acid (EACA) induces a clinically-useful anti-haemorrhagic, mildly thrombotic state while ellagic acid (EA) induces a severe hypercoagulable one. Reversal of these states may on occasion by necessary. The effectiveness of the antiplatelet drugs, aspirin and dipyridamole (ASA/D), in reducing thrombus weight was studied in normocoagulable animals and animals made hypercoagulable with EACA (333mg/kg) or EA (1.2mg/kg). Heparin (114iu/kg) was tested in the EACA group, both alone and in combination with ASA/D. Thrombogenicity was measured by weight formed on intravenous platinum wire in one hour. In normocoagulable animals, ASA/D reduced thrombus by 32%. Ellagic acid trebled mean thrombus weight and ASA/D reduced this by 49%, but did not restore normality. EACA increased mean thrombosis by one sixth. Treatment with heparin reduced this by 48% to a level well below that of untreated animals. Addition of a single dose of aspirin/dipyridamole to the heparin regime, reduced thrombosis by a further 31%, reaching to 21% of control thrombus. The results were statistically significant. Kaolin-activated blood clotting time was shortened by EA, but EACA had little effect on it, while ASA/D slightly and heparin markedly lengthened it.     

Prevention of experimental venous thrombosis in rabbits with low molecular weight heparin, dextran and their combinations, administered before or during induction of venous endothelial trauma

An in vivo experimental venous thrombosis model based on endothelial damage and flow reduction was used to investigate the effect of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) alone and in combination with dextran and the effect of surgical and endothelial trauma on thrombus formation, formation of occlusive thrombi and thrombus weights. Five groups with 15 rabbits in each were studied. Two groups received dalteparin (50 anti-Xa IU/kg i.v.) before surgical trauma or after, during the endothelial trauma and two groups received dalteparin (50 anti-Xa IU/kg i.v.) with dextran 70 (1 g/kg i.v.) before surgical trauma or after, during the endothelial trauma. Compared to a control group (saline) all treatment regimes reduced significantly the frequency of thrombosis and occlusive thrombi as well as thrombus weights. No significant difference was observed between the identical treatment groups when the substances were introduced before respective after surgical trauma. It is concluded from the present study that thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in this particular in vivo model, given before or after surgical trauma is equally effective. Dextran has a certain augmenting thromboprophylactic effect when added to LMWH in this model.     

Comparison of bivalirudin, enoxaparin, and unfractionated heparin in preventing cardiac catheter thrombosis. Results of an in-vitro study

Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor binds specifically and reversibly to both fibrin-bound and unbound thrombin. Bivalirudin is approved for use as an anticoagulant in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The OASIS-5 trial presented a significant increase in cardiac catheter thrombosis for the pentasaccharid fondaparinux compared to enoxaparin. Catheter thrombosis has never been reported in any trial using bivalirudin. Our study compared the development of catheter thrombosis for bivalirudin, enoxaparin, and unfractionated heparin in a controlled in-vitro environment. Ten healthy male volunteers were pretreated with aspirin 500 mg 2 hours before venesection of 50 ml of blood. The seven groups of anticoagulant combinations tested were: UFH, UFH + eptifibatide, enoxaparin, enoxaparin + eptifibatide, bivalirudin bolus, bivalirudin + eptifibatide, bivalirudin bolus + continuous infusion. The blood/anticoagulant mix continuously circulated through a cardiac guiding catheter for 60 minutes or until the catheter became blocked with thrombus. Thrombus development was assessed by weighing each catheter before and after the procedure. Electron microscopy was used to quantify the degree of erythrocyte, platelet and fibrin deposition. Following anticoagulation with bolus dose bivalirudin, the catheter was invariably occluded with thrombus after 33 minutes of circulation. However, a continuous infusion of Bivalirudin prevented the development of occlusive catheter thrombosis. In the bolus bivalirudin group the mean thrombus weight was significantly greater than in all other groups (p-value < 0.01 in all analyses). Bivalirudin given as a bolus was not sufficient to prevent cardiac catheter thrombosis in our in-vitro study. However, a continuous infusion of bivalirudin had similar anti-thrombotic efficacy compared to other treatment strategies.     

Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy

Low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparins have been shown to be at least as effective as unfractionated (UF) heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in nonpregnant subjects. LMW heparins have been shown to be safe when used during pregnancy as they do not cross the placenta. Up to now, they have been used mainly in thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and rarely in the treatment of acute DVT in pregnant women. In a prospective observational study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of the LMW heparin, dalteparin, with UF heparin in the initial treatment (first week) of DVT during pregnancy. After confirmation of DVT by ultrasonography, 10 women were treated with UF heparin (25,430 IU/day, mean) and 21 women with dalteparin (16,000 IU/day, mean) for 7 days and, thereafter, all women were given treatment doses of LMW heparin for another 2 weeks. The dose was then gradually decreased and kept at a high prophylactic dose until delivery. One patient in the dalteparin group had recurrence of DVT 2 weeks after starting the treatment. No differences were observed between the groups in symptoms or bleeding complications during pregnancy and delivery. Our results indicate that LMW heparin is as effective and safe as UF heparin for the first week of treatment, but LMW heparin has the advantage of being easily administered and few laboratory controls are required.     

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: developing an experimental model

To develop a simple experimental model for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in rat, 24 male Sprague-Dawley rats (14 experimental and 10 controls) were studied. After anesthesia, a 1.5 mm x 10 mm cranial window was made to expose superior sagittal sinus (SSS). A filter paper strip soaked in 40% ferric chloride topically applied for 5 min to induce SSS thrombosis in experimental group. Five of these rats underwent autopsy at 24 h after rota rod study, other 9 rats underwent MRI after 24 h followed by autopsy at 36-48 h. On MRI, T2 hyperintense lesions were seen in all 9 rats of study group but none in controls. On autopsy, TTC staining revealed changes in 7 out of 14 experimental rats but in none of the controls. The rota rod study results revealed an insignificant difference in the experimental and control group. There was no spontaneous death in experimental or control group during the study. The present experimental model is simple, easy to carry out and results in TTC staining changes in 50% and T2 hyperintensity on MRI in all which could be due to SSS thrombosis.