Timing of sentinel lymphadenectomy in cutaneous melanoma

PURPOSE: The conduct of sentinel lymphadenectomy for cutaneous melanoma varies substantially among the medical disciplines. The authors sought to characterize the number of hot spots identified during preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for cutaneous melanoma and to determine its relation to the harvesting of sentinel lymph nodes. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with cutaneous melanoma underwent lymphoscintigraphy with filtered Tc-99m sulfur colloid before sentinel lymphadenectomy. The lymphoscintigrams were reviewed and the number of hot spots visualized over time and the number of sentinel nodes harvested were determined. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy identified 79 patients with 87 lymphatic basins at risk for metastatic disease. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in a mean time of 30 minutes (range, 15 to 40 minutes). The mean number of hot spots increased from 0.2 to 2.0 hot spots 40 minutes after the initial static image, but the number of hot spots stabilized between 20 and 40 minutes. The same number of sentinel nodes as hot spots visualized were harvested in 58% of patients. Fewer sentinel nodes were identified at the time of surgery than were visualized by lymphoscintigrams in 39% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: More hot spots were identified up to 40 minutes after the initiation of lymphoscintigraphy. Sentinel lymphadenectomy can be performed as near to 40 minutes after the initiation of lymphoscintigraphy as is logistically reasonable. However, there may be substantial latitude in delayed performance of sentinel lymphadenectomy.     

Revolutionary impact of lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative sentinel node mapping in the clinical practice of oncology

Intraoperative lymphatic mapping is a rapidly emerging diagnostic approach that is revolutionizing the management of patients who have solid malignant tumors. The procedure is being performed for the most part with radiopharmaceuticals and vital blue dyes. It is widely believed that passive trapping of radioactive particles determines the sentinel lymph node (SLN) for intraoperative delineation of potential draining sites. In this article, we show that dendritic cells within the SLN actively take up and trap radioactive particles and thus define the SLN immunologically. The role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and the selection of the site of placement of mapping reagents for intraoperative lymphatic mapping are established for patients with melanoma. For patients with breast cancer, the role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is controversial. We have shown that this procedure can be performed with success in identifying SLN as hot spots 87% of the time, with 20% of the cases showing draining nodes to other basins in addition to or independent of the axilla. The use of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for patients with breast cancer can therefore be justified. The selection of the site for placement of radiotracer and blue dye can vary for patients with breast cancer depending on the primary site of the lesion. However, based on data from our institution and others, the delivery of the mapping reagents (both radioactive tracers and blue dye) to the subareolar space may help to standardize breast cancer SLN mapping.     

Patterns of lymphatic drainage from the skin in patients with melanoma.

An essential prerequisite for a successful sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure is an accurate map of the pattern of lymphatic drainage from the primary tumor site in each patient. In melanoma patients, mapping requires high-quality lymphoscintigraphy, which can identify the actual lymphatic collecting vessels as they drain into the sentinel lymph nodes. Small-particle radiocolloids are needed to achieve this goal, and imaging protocols must be adapted to ensure that all true sentinel nodes, including those in unexpected locations, are found in every patient. Clinical prediction of lymphatic drainage from the skin is not possible. The old clinical guidelines based on Sappey's lines therefore should be abandoned. Patterns of lymphatic drainage from the skin are highly variable from patient to patient, even from the same area of the skin. Unexpected lymphatic drainage from the skin of the back to sentinel nodes in the triangular intermuscular space and, in some patients, through the posterior body wall to sentinel nodes in the para-aortic, paravertebral, and retroperitoneal areas has been found. Lymphatic drainage from the head and neck frequently involves sentinel nodes in multiple node fields and can occur from the base of the neck up to nodes in the occipital or upper cervical areas or from the scalp down to nodes at the neck base, bypassing many node groups. The sentinel node is not always found in the nearest node field and is best defined as "any lymph node receiving direct lymphatic drainage from a primary tumor site." Lymphatic drainage can occur from the upper limb to sentinel nodes above the axilla. Drainage to the epitrochlear region from the hand and arm as well as to the popliteal region from the foot and leg is more common than was previously thought. Interval nodes, which lie along the course of a lymphatic vessel between a lesion site and a recognized node field, are not uncommon, especially in the trunk. Drainage across the midline of the body is quite common in the trunk and in the head and neck. Micrometastatic disease can be present in any sentinel node regardless of its location, and for the SLNB technique to be accurate, all true sentinel nodes must be biopsied in every patient.     

Lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative lymphatic mapping of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma patients

Identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) using lymphoscintigraphy, the blue dye technique and intraoperative lymphatic mapping with a gamma-detecting probe has become the standard of care in diagnosing and treating melanoma. Numerous clinical studies have proven the reliability of predicting the histology of remaining lymph nodes in the lymphatic basin from the histologic evaluation of the SLNs. Technical and clinical factors presented in this paper have been shown to increase the accuracy of localization of SLNs. The nuclear medicine technologist shares a vital role in the radiopharmaceutical preparation and administration for preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative lymphatic mapping in patients with melanoma.     

Temporary shielding of hot spots in the drainage areas of cutaneous melanoma improves accuracy of lymphoscintigraphic sentinel lymph node diagnostics

Detection of the "true" sentinel lymph nodes, permitting correct staging of regional lymph nodes, is essential for management and prognostic assessment in malignant melanoma. In this study, it was prospectively evaluated whether simple temporary shielding of hot spots in lymphatic drainage areas could improve the accuracy of sentinel lymph node diagnostics. In 100 consecutive malignant melanoma patients (45 women, 55 men; age 11-91 years), dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy in various views was performed after strict intracutaneous application of technetium-99m nanocolloid (40-150 MBq; 0.05 ml/deposit) around the tumour (31 patients) or the biopsy scar (69 patients, safety distance 1 cm). The images were acquired with and without temporary lead shielding of the most prominent hot spots in the drainage area. In 33/100 patients, one or two additional sentinel lymph nodes that showed less tracer accumulation or were smaller (<1.5 cm) were detected after shielding. Four of these patients had metastases in the sentinel lymph nodes; the non-sentinel lymph nodes were tumour negative. In 3/100 patients, hot spots in the drainage area proved to be lymph vessels, lymph vessel intersections or lymph vessel ectasias after temporary shielding; hence, a node interpreted as a non-sentinel lymph node at first glance proved to be the real sentinel lymph node. In two of these patients, lymph node metastasis was histologically confirmed; the non-sentinel lymph nodes were tumour free. In 7/100 patients the exact course of lymph vessels could be mapped after shielding. In one of these patients, two additional sentinel lymph nodes (with metastasis) were detected. Overall, in 43/100 patients the temporary shielding yielded additional information, with sentinel lymph node metastases in 7%. In conclusion, when used in combination with dynamic acquisition in various views, temporary shielding of prominent hot spots in the drainage area of a malignant melanoma of the skin leads to an improvement in the accuracy of identification and localisation of sentinel lymph nodes by lymphoscintigraphy.     

Heterogeneous patterns of lymphatic drainage to sentinel lymph nodes by primary melanoma from different anatomic sites

We want to define the patterns of lymphatic drainage for primary melanoma to sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) based on a large lymphoscintigraphic database. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was used to identify and classify SLN drainage basins and patterns of drainage. METHODS: Lymphoscintigraphy using intradermally administered technetium-99m labeled sulfur colloid was performed on 400 consecutive patients with malignant melanoma to define lymphatic drainage channels and draining SLN basins before surgery. Primary tumor sites consisted of head and neck, upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity. Different types of drainage patterns were classified and correlated with different anatomic sites. RESULTS: SLN(s) were identified in over 98% of the patients, whereas lymphatic drainage channels were successfully identified in 90% of the patients. Drainage from the primary site to a single SLN through a single lymphatic channel (type IA) was seen in 186 of 400 patients (47%) as the most common type. In patients with a single SLN within a single basin (type I-V), the percentage of patients with primary lesions in the head and neck, upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity regions were 61%, 79%, 55%, and 78%, respectively. In cases of multiple lymphatic channels (type VI-VII), the percentages of patients with primary lesions in the head and neck, upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity regions were 24%, 8%, 36%, and 19%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Various drainage patterns were noted from primary melanomas in different anatomic sites. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is important in establishing the SLN basins for harvesting the SLN(s).     

Evaluation and localization of lymphatic drainage and sentinel lymph nodes in patients with head and neck melanomas by hybrid SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphic imaging

In patients with head and neck tumors, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can be used to map lymphatic drainage patterns and identify sentinel lymph nodes. However, it is very difficult to determine the exact locations of head and neck sentinel nodes on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy without the use of anatomic landmarks. Lymph nodes in the head and neck are grouped into 7 regions, or levels, on the basis of anatomic landmarks. In patients undergoing standard lymphoscintigraphy, obtaining lateral marker images that show important anatomic landmarks can help with the localization of sentinel nodes. However, technical problems often render marker images of little or no use. Hybrid SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphic imaging facilitates the localization of sentinel nodes by reliably showing the relationships between sentinel nodes and important anatomic structures. After reading this article, the reader should understand the lymph node level classification system for head and neck melanomas, be able to describe the technique used for the imaging of sentinel nodes in the head and neck region, and be able to demonstrate how SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphic imaging can enable precise sentinel node localization and thus help to ensure minimal dissection.     

Prepubic sentinel node location in penile carcinoma

An unusual sentinel node location in a patient with penile carcinoma is described. The preoperative lymphoscintigram showed a prepubic sentinel node. The node could be harvested during surgery. This case illustrates one of the advantages of lymphatic mapping in penile carcinoma: preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can identify lymph nodes outside the usual nodal basins.     

Sentinel node detection and definition may depend on the imaging agent and timing.

PURPOSE: Two cases of sentinel lymph node imaging are presented in which the results are exceptions to what the literature generally defines as sentinel lymph nodes. In one case, Tc-99m antimony trisulfide colloid produced significantly different results than did Tc-99m tin colloid. In the second case, the results bring into question the definition of a sentinel node as the first in a lymphatic drainage pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In one patient, lymphoscintigraphy was performed initially using Tc-99m antimony trisulfide colloid injected intradermally around a melanoma excision site. Repeated lymphoscintigraphy 1 month later, 1 hour before sentinel node excision, was done using Tc-99m tin colloid, a larger particle than antimony trisulfide colloid. The second patient, with a melanoma biopsied only, had sentinel node imaging performed using Tc-99m sulfide colloid, a particulate also larger than antimony trisulfide colloid and also 1 hour before sentinel node excision. RESULTS: In the first patient, imaging with the smaller antimony trisulfide colloid showed more lymphatic pathways and more sentinel nodes than with tin colloid. In the second patient, the first focus of retention of the imaging agent in the lymphatic pathway seen showed less intense accumulation than the next focus in the pathway, contrary to published reports that the sentinel node shows more intense accumulation than do nodes further downstream in a lymphatic pathway. CONCLUSIONS: There are exceptions to published characteristics of sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy, so care must be exercised in localizing sentinel nodes.     

Identification of bilateral breast sentinel lymph nodes draining primary melanoma of the back by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative mapping.

A 30-year-old white woman with a primary malignant melanoma of her right back at the Sappey line, 4 cm from the midline at the L2 level, underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative mapping of the sentinel lymph node using lymphazurin injection at the primary site and a hand-held gamma probe. Lymphoscintigraphy showed one sentinel lymph node in each breast and another one in the right axilla. These three sentinel lymph nodes were accurately identified using a hand-held gamma probe during operation. An additional sentinel and one nonsentinel lymph node from the right axilla were harvested. All four sentinel lymph nodes were blue and showed significantly elevated radioactivity compared with background. Histologic analysis showed that all these lymph nodes were negative for metastatic melanoma. She has been followed for a period of 26.7 months since her selective sentinel lymphadenectomy and has been free of disease to date. This case illustrates the importance of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in identifying in-transit sentinel lymph nodes in both breasts in addition to the clinically predictable sentinel lymph node(s) in the right axilla.     

Lymphoscintigraphic sentinel node identification in patients with breast cancer: the role of SPECT-CT

Purpose Lymph node status is a major factor in determining the stage, appropriate therapy and outcome in patients with breast cancer. It is therefore of clinical importance to accurately identify all sentinel nodes (SNs) for each individual tumour before surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of SPECT-CT lymphoscintigraphy in SN identification in patients with breast cancer.Methods Lymphoscintigraphy comprising planar and SPECT-CT acquisition was performed in 157 consecutive patients with breast cancer (mean age 54.7±10.6, range 27–81 years) with a palpable mass (n=100), with a non-palpable mass (n=52) or post lumpectomy (n=5). Planar and SPECT-CT images were interpreted separately and the two imaging techniques were compared with respect to their ability to identify hot nodes.Results Planar imaging alone was negative for identification of hot nodes in 15% of the patients. SPECT-CT alone was negative in 10% and both techniques were negative in 9% of the patients. Forty-six of the total of 361 (13%) hot nodes identified by lymphoscintigraphy were detected only on SPECT-CT, including 21 nodes obscured by the scattered radiation from the injection site, nine adjacent nodes misinterpreted on planar images as a single node and 16 nodes which were missed on planar images and detected on SPECT data. SPECT-CT detected additional sites of drainage unexpected on planar images, including axillary (n=23 patients), internal mammary (n=5 patients), interpectoral (n=3 patients) and intramammary (n=2 patients) lymph node sites. Fourteen of the 329 (4%) hot lesions seen on planar images were false positive non-nodal sites of uptake that were accurately assessed by SPECT-CT and further validated by surgery. In a single patient, SPECT-CT was negative while planar images identified the SN.Conclusion SPECT-CT may improve the preoperative localisation of draining nodes in patients with breast cancer. It may detect hot nodes missed by planar imaging, exclude non-nodal false positive sites of uptake and accurately localise axillary and extra-axillary nodes.     

Influence of fast lymphatic drainage on metastatic spread in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a prospective feasibility study

The concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous malignant melanoma is widely established. Preoperative cutaneous lymphoscintigraphic mapping is a reliable method for identifying the nodal basins at risk of metastases in melanomas. In this prospective study we investigated the correlation between the scintigraphic appearance time and the metastatic involvement of sentinel lymph nodes. In 276 malignant melanoma patients (137 women, 139 men; age 16-93 years), dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy was performed after strict intracutaneous application of technetium-99m nanocolloid (40-150 MBq; 0.05 ml/deposit) around the tumour or biopsy scar. Analysis of dynamic scans primarily focussed on the appearance time of sentinel lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node visualisation 20 min as slow drainage. Fast lymphatic drainage was found in 236 patients, of whom 34 (14.4%) had sentinel lymph node metastases. Twenty-two patients showed hybrid (fast and slow) lymphatic drainage, and eight (36.4%) of them had sentinel lymph node metastases. Seven of the latter demonstrated fast lymphatic drainage, while one showed one positive sentinel lymph node with fast and another with slow drainage. The melanomas of 18 patients demonstrated exclusively slow lymphatic drainage, in all cases without sentinel lymph node metastases. This prospective study indicates that the scintigraphic appearance time of sentinel lymph nodes seems to be a clinically relevant factor for prediction of metastatic spread of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Larger numbers of patients need to be examined to truly assess the benefit of the scintigraphic appearance time compared with other predictors of sentinel lymph node tumour positivity.     

Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomographyfor sentinel node mapping in breast cancer

Accurate lymph node staging is essential for the prognosis and treatment in patients with cancer. The sentinel lymph node is the first node to which lymphatic drainage and metastasis from the primary tumor occurs. In malignant melanoma and breast cancer, the sentinel lymph node detection and biopsy already have been implemented into clinical practice. Currently, 2 techniques are used to identify the sentinel lymph nodes: technetium-99m-labeled colloid and blue dye. After peritumoral injection, the material migrates through the lymphatics to the first lymph nodes draining the tumor. The precise anatomic localization of the sentinel lymph nodes is important for minimal invasive surgery and to avoid incomplete removal of the sentinel lymph nodes. All sentinel lymph nodes should be resected to achieve a complete nodal staging. In the inguinal or low-axillary nodal stations, planar scintigraphic images mostly are adequate for the localization of the sentinel lymph nodes. However, in the regions of the head and neck, the chest, and the pelvis, an imaging method for the more precise anatomic localization of the sentinel lymph nodes preoperatively is highly desired. Recently, integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography (SPECT/CT) scanners have become available. Initial reports suggest that integrated SPECT/CT might have an additional value in sentinel lymph node scintigraphy in head and neck tumors and tumors draining to the pelvic lymph nodes. We evaluated the clinical use of integrated SPECT/CT in the identification of the sentinel lymph nodes in patients with operable breast cancer. In our experience, localization and identification of sentinel lymph nodes was more accurate by integrated SPECT/CT imaging in comparison with planar images and SPECT images, respectively. In this report, the experiences of sentinel lymph node imaging with SPECT/CT are summarized.     

Lymphoscintigraphy in cutaneous melanoma: a total body atlas of sentinel node mapping.

Lymphoscintigraphy of malignant melanoma has been a reliable method of identifying regional lymph nodes at risk for metastases and is now considered part of the standard of care in patients with melanoma. The status of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is predictive of the metastatic status of the corresponding regional lymph node group. Lymphatic channel mapping allows identification of the SLN, thereby making selective lymph node sampling possible. Consequently, SLN identification with lymphoscintigraphy results in both less extensive surgery and more efficient pathologic examination of the lymph node specimens. Therefore, it is imperative that radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians know which radiopharmaceuticals to use, recognize different lymphatic drainage patterns from various primary tumor sites throughout the body, use proper imaging techniques, and recognize potential pitfalls in image interpretation.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in oral cancer: validation of technique and clinical implications of added oblique planar lymphoscintigraphy and/or tomography

Purpose: To validate lymphatic mapping combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging procedure, and to evaluate the possible clinical implications of added oblique lymphoscintigraphy and/or tomography and test the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of lymphoscintigraphy.

Material and Methods: Forty patients (17 F and 23 M, aged 32-90) with 24 T1 and 16 T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Planar lymphoscintigraphy, emission and transmission tomography were performed. Detection and excision of the sentinel nodes were guided by a gamma probe. The sentinel nodes were step-sectioning and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and cytokeratin (CK 1). Histology and follow-up were used as “gold standard”. Tumor location, number of sentinel lymph nodes, metastasis, and recurrences were registered. Two observers evaluated the lymphoscintigraphic images to assess the inter-rater agreement.

Results: Eleven (28%) patients were upstaged. The sentinel lymph node identification rate was 97.5%. Sentinel lymph node biopsy significantly differentiated between patients with or without lymph node metastasis (P = 0.001). Lymphatic mapping revealed 124 hotspots and 144 hot lymph nodes were removed by sentinel lymph node biopsy. Three patients developed a lymph node recurrence close to the primary tumor site during follow-up. Added oblique lymphoscintigraphic images and/or tomography revealed extra hotspots in 15/40 (38%) patients. In 4/40 (10%), extra contralateral hotspots were detected.

Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy upstaged 28% of the patients. Sentinel lymph nodes close to the primary tumor were difficult to find. Added oblique planar images and/or tomographic images revealed extra clinical relevant hotspots in 38% of patients. Reproducibility proved excellent.     

Correlation between theoretical anatomical patterns of lymphatic drainage and lymphoscintigraphy findings during sentinel node detection in head and neck melanomas

Purpose

In the diagnosis of head and neck melanoma, lymphatic drainage is complex and highly variable. As regional lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors, lymphoscintigraphy can help map individual drainage patterns. The aim of this study was to compare the results of lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection with theoretical anatomical patterns of lymphatic drainage based on the location of the primary tumour lesion in patients with head and neck melanoma. We also determined the percentage of discrepancies between our lymphoscintigraphy and the theoretical location of nodal drainage predicted by a large lymphoscintigraphic database, in order to explain recurrence and false-negative SLN biopsies.

Methods

In this retrospective study of 152 patients with head and neck melanoma, the locations of the SLNs on lymphoscintigraphy and detected intraoperatively were compared with the lymphatic drainage predicted by on-line software based on a large melanoma database.

Results

All patients showed lymphatic drainage and in all patients at least one SLN was identified by lymphoscintigraphy. Of the 152 patients, 4 had a primary lesion in areas that were not described in the Sydney Melanoma Unit database, so agreement could only be evaluated in 148 patients. Agreement between lymphoscintigraphic findings and the theoretical lymphatic drainage predicted by the software was completely concordant in 119 of the 148 patients (80.4 %, 95 % CI 73.3 – 86 %). However, this concordance was partial (some concordant nodes and others not) in 18 patients (12.2 %, 95 % CI 7.8 – 18.4 %). Discordance was complete in 11 patients (7.4 %, 95 % CI 4.2 – 12.8 %).

Conclusion

In melanoma of the head and neck there is a high correlation between lymphatic drainage found by lymphoscintigraphy and the predicted drainage pattern and basins provided by a large reference database. Due to unpredictable drainage, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is essential to accurately detect the SLNs in head and neck melanoma.

     

99mTc-human serum albumin: an effective radiotracer for identifying sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has emerged as a novel approach for identifying patients with melanoma and regional nodal micrometastasis who may benefit from full nodal basin resection. To identify the pattern of tumor lymphatic drainage and the SLN, lymphoscintigraphy has been performed using primarily 99mTc-sulfur colloid (SC). In this study, we compare the efficacy of SLN biopsy using 99mTc-human serum albumin (HSA) with SLN biopsy after SC-based lymphoscintigraphy. METHODS: One hundred and six patients with localized cutaneous melanoma were studied. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed after intradermal injection of HSA in 85 patients and SC in 21 patients. Four patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy twice, once with SC and once with HSA. Dynamic images were acquired for up to 1 h, followed by high-count images of the SLN in various projections so that the most likely site was marked on the skin for biopsy. Intraoperatively, blue dye was injected around the primary site. Twenty-four patients underwent SLN dissection directed by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and vital blue dye mapping; in the remaining 80 patients, a gamma probe was added intraoperatively to the localization procedure. Two patients underwent mapping with gamma probe alone. RESULTS: Draining lymphatic basins and nodes were identified by lymphoscintigraphy in all patients. The SLN was identified in 95% of patients when both blue dye and intraoperative gamma probe were used. When 99mTc-HSA was used for imaging, 98% of the SLNs ultimately identified were radiolabeled, and 82% were both hot and blue. Of the SLN recovered with SC, all the nodes were radiolabeled; however, there was only 58% hot and blue concordance. Greater numbers of SLNs were removed in the SC group (median 2.0 versus 1.0, P = 0.02); however, the incidence of micrometastasis was statistically similar in both HSA and SC cohorts. In the 4 patients examined with both tracers, SLN mapping was similar. CONCLUSION: Although SC has been the radiotracer of choice for SLN mapping in melanoma, HSA appears to be a suitable alternative, with identical success rates. In fact, the higher concordance between hot and blue nodes using HSA suggests superiority of this tracer for this purpose.     

Alternative lymphatic pathway after previous axillary node dissection in recurrent/primary breast cancer

OBJECTIVES: The sentinel lymph node approach has almost become the standard procedure of choice in the management of patients with early breast cancer. The status of sentinel nodes, whether or not pathologically involved by cancer cells, represents those of the axillary nodes with a negative predictive value of almost 100%. If the axillary lymphatic nodal drainage is altered, alternative lymphatic pathways and accordingly sentinel node location will be changed. METHODS: In this article, 4 patients are presented, 3 with recurrent breast cancer who had already undergone lumpectomy, axillary node dissection, and radiotherapy in the past and 1 with primary breast cancer after surgical removal of a malignant melanoma on her back and had axillary node dissection on the same side as the breast cancer. These patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy followed by sentinel node localization using the gamma probe and also blue dye injection during surgery. RESULTS: All patients showed alternate lymphatic pathways, 1 had an ipsilateral internal mammary node and crossed lymphatics to a contralateral axillary node, 2 had intramammary sentinel nodes, and 1 had an internal mammary on the same side. Pathologic examination of the intramammary and contralateral sentinel nodes were negative for metastases. Internal mammary sentinel nodes were not biopsied. CONCLUSION: We feel that sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy should be done even in patients who have altered lymphatic pathways resulting from previous axillary node dissection. It allows identifying and biopsy of the sentinel node at its new unpredicted location.     

Evaluation of the sentinel lymph node combining SPECT/CT with the planar image and its importance for the surgical act

The sentinel node biopsy procedure is based on the hypothesis of the existence of an orderly and predictable pattern of lymphatic drainage to a regional lymph node basin. This results in the consideration of all lymph nodes with direct drainage from the primary tumor as sentinel nodes. The sentinel node is not necessarily the hottest or the most nearby node, although this is often the case. Lymphoscintigraphy has been an essential component for preoperative sentinel node identification. With the new generation of multimodality gamma cameras, SPECT/CT has been incorporated into the sentinel node procedure. The resulting SPECT/CT fused images depict sentinel nodes in an anatomical landscape providing a helpful roadmap for surgeons. Therefore, it is necessary to define the role of SPECT/CT in relation to the classical planar lymphoscintigraphy for the identification of sentinel nodes. To understand the combined use of lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT, the criteria for sentinel node identification on preoperative images must be specified. The authors, based on their experience in this field, present tentative criteria to identify lymph nodes as sentinel nodes both in planar and SPECT/CT images and classify them into different categories. The use of these scintigraphic categories to characterize radioactive lymph nodes is also helpful for surgical decision making.     

Radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant cutaneous melanoma.

The procedure of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with malignant cutaneous melanoma has evolved from the notion that the tumor drains in a logical way through the lymphatic system, from the first to subsequent levels. As a consequence, the first lymph node encountered (the sentinel node) will most likely be the first affected by metastasis; therefore, a negative sentinel node makes it highly unlikely that other nodes in the same lymphatic basin are affected. Although the long-term therapeutic benefit of the sentinel lymph node biopsy per se has not yet been ascertained, this procedure distinguishes patients without nodal metastases, who can avoid nodal basin dissection with its associated risk of lymphedema, from those with metastatic involvement, who may benefit from additional therapy. Sentinel lymph node biopsy would represent a significant advantage as a minimally invasive procedure, considering that an average of only 20% of melanoma patients with a Breslow thickness between 1.5 and 4 mm harbor metastasis in their sentinel node and are therefore candidates for elective lymph node dissection. Furthermore, histologic sampling errors (amounting to approximately 12% of lymph nodes in the conventional routine) can be reduced if one assesses a single (sentinel) node extensively rather than assessing the standard few histologic sections in a high number of lymph nodes per patient. The cells from which cutaneous melanomas originate are located between the dermis and the epidermis, a zone that drains to the inner lymphatic network in the reticular dermis and, in turn, to larger collecting lymphatics in the subcutis. Therefore, the optimal route for interstitial administration of radiocolloids for lymphoscintigraphy and subsequent radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy is intradermal or subdermal injection. (99m)Tc-Labeled colloids in various size ranges are equally adequate for radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with cutaneous melanoma, depending on local experience and availability. For melanomas along the midline of the head, neck, and trunk, particular consideration should be given to ambiguous lymphatic drainage, which frequently requires interstitial administration virtually all around the tumor or surgical scar from prior excision of the melanoma. Lymphoscintigraphy is an essential part of radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy because images are used to direct the surgeon to the sites of the nodes. The sentinel lymph node should have a significantly higher count than that of the background (at least 10:1 intraoperatively). After removal of the sentinel node, the surgical bed must be reexamined to ensure that all radioactive sites are identified and removed for analysis. Virtually the entire sentinel lymph node should be processed for histopathology, including both conventional hematoxylin-eosin staining and immune staining with antibodies to the S-100 and HMB-45 antigens. The success rate of radioguidance in localizing the sentinel lymph node in melanoma patients is approximately 98% in institutions that perform a high number of procedures and approaches 99% when combined with the vital blue-dye technique. Growing evidence of the high correlation between a sentinel lymph node biopsy negative for cancer and a negative status for the lymphatic basin-evidence, therefore, of the high prognostic value of sentinel node biopsy-has led to the procedure's being included in the most recent version of the TNM staging system and starting to become the standard of care for patients with cutaneous melanoma.