An Evidence-Based Analysis of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Alone

While pancreas transplantation has evolved within two decades from a frustrating and poorly-accepted therapeutic option to a highly successful procedure, the respective benefits of the successive surgical and immunosuppressive developments have remained unclear. The aim of this study was to determine using an evidence-based methodology, which novel approaches have contributed to the current results and whether pancreas transplantation is cost-effective. Out of 2481 articles, 102 analyzed either surgical or immunosuppressive aspects of pancreas transplantation. Urological complications were more frequent in bladder over enteric drainage (range: 62-63% vs. 12-20%, p = 0.0001), but without significant difference in patient or graft survival. Portal drainage was associated with a trend toward fewer complications and better hyperinsulinemia control over systemic drainage in retrospective studies. Immunosuppression combining induction therapy, a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mophetil (MMF) and corticosteroids were associated with a 40% decreased incidence of rejection (p = 0.01) and an increase in graft survival above 90% at 1 year (p < 0.05). Pancreas transplantation is highly cost-effective compared to conservative alternatives. We conclude that despite a paucity of large studies, enteric drainage should be recommended but the benefits of portal venous drainage remain debated. Quadruple immunosuppression protocols including induction therapy should be the standard regimen.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Comparison With Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction – Long-Term Results

This study compared the effects of using two T-cell depleting antibodies, alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin), as induction immunosuppression for recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation given a prednisone-free maintenance regimen. We used a single-center, nonrandomised, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab (n = 50) or antithymocyte globulin (n = 38) induction in combination with a prednisone-free, tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression protocol. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function, incidence of infectious and malignant complications, and cost considerations. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and antithymocyte globulin. Rejection rates were also nearly equivalent at 1 and 2 years. Viral infectious complications were statistically significantly lower in the alemtuzumab group. The cost of alemtuzumab induction was lower than antithymocyte globulin. Alemtuzumab induction followed by steroid-free maintenance therapy with a tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression regimen provided an effective, safe and cost-conscious approach to SPK transplantation.     

Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Utilizing a Common Arterial Conduit: Early Experience and Potential Applications

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation has gained acceptance as a therapeutic modality for patients with end-stage renal disease secondary to diabetes mellitus. In some instances, performing the procedure as conventionally described with renal revascularization from the left iliac vessels and pancreatic arterial inflow from the right iliac vessels may be difficult or undesirable. We describe our experience with an alternate operative technique utilizing a single arterial conduit to vascularize both organs. We believe that this technique may be of use in certain patients undergoing simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.     

A Comparison of Alemtuzumab with Basiliximab Induction in Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Transplantation

Alemtuzumab is a humanized, rat monoclonal antibody directed against the CD52 antigen. After binding, alemtuzumab causes profound and durable depletion and has been successfully used as immune induction therapy for organ transplantation.
This was a single center, retrospective review of patients who underwent simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation at the University of Wisconsin using alemtuzumab induction therapy compared with historical controls that received induction with basiliximab.
There were no differences in donor or recipient demographics, rates of patient survival, renal or pancreas allograft survival, renal allograft delayed graft function, EBV infection, BKV infection, PTLD or sepsis. There was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the alemtuzumab-treated group.
Given the significantly higher incidence of CMV infections, we have since altered our induction protocol to consist of a single 30 mg dose of alemtuzumab instead of two doses. The long-term effects of this change remain to be seen. Due to the results seen in this study, the low initial cost of the drug and the absence of any severe, short-term side effects, alemtuzumab has been selected as the induction drug of choice at our center for patients undergoing SPK.     

Steroid Avoidance Versus Steroid Withdrawal After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Two steroid-sparing immunosuppressive regimens were prospectively compared in recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, one did not include steroids at all and the other included steroids for the first 3 months following transplantation. All patients received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine. Fifty patients were randomised in an open-label, single center and prospective study. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection during the first 12 months after transplantation was the primary endpoint of the study. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 4% in both groups. No statistically significant difference in patient (96 and 100%), kidney (96 and 100%) or pancreas (84 and 92%) survival was observed 1 year after transplantation in the steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal groups, respectively. The total number of adverse events (including severe ones), length of hospitalization and infectious episodes did not differ between groups. Blood glucose and insulin levels, lipid profile and hemoglobin A1C levels did not differ statistically between the two groups. However, the 1-year serum creatinine level was significantly higher in the steroid avoidance group (132 vs. 114 micromol/L; p = 0.02). Steroid avoidance and steroid withdrawal 3 months after transplantation are safe and effective regimens for diabetic patients with pancreas-kidney transplants.     

Ischemic Pre-conditioning in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

To assess the immediate and long-term effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in deceased donor. liver transplantation (LT), we designed a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 60 donors: control group (CTL, n = 30) or study group (IPC, n = 30). IPC was induced by 10-min hiliar clamping immediately before recovery of organs. Clinical data and blood and liver samples were obtained in the donor and in the recipient for measurements. IPC significantly improved biochemical markers of liver cell function such as uric acid, hyaluronic acid and Hypoxia-Induced Factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) levels. Moreover, the degree of apoptosis was significantly lower in the IPC group. On clinical basis, IPC significantly improved the serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels and reduced the need for reoperation in the postoperative period. Moreover, the incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF) was lower in the IPC group, but did not achieve statistical significance. We conclude that 10-min IPC protects against I/R injury in deceased donor LT.     

Prospective Randomized Trial of Maintenance Immunosuppression With Rapid Discontinuation of Prednisone in Adult Kidney Transplantation

Rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) has minimized steroid‐related complications following kidney transplant (KT). This trial compares long‐term (10‐year) outcomes with three different maintenance immunosuppressive protocols following RDP in adult KT. Recipients (n = 440; 73% living donor) from March 2001 to April 2006 were randomized into one of three arms: cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (CSA/MMF, n = 151); high‐level tacrolimus (TAC, 8–12 μg/L) and low‐level sirolimus (SIR, 3–7 μg/L) (TAC^H/SIR^L, n = 149) or low‐level TAC (3–7 μg/L) and high‐level SIR (8–12 μg/L) (TAC^L/SIR^H, n = 140). Median follow‐up was ～7 years. There were no differences between arms in 10‐year actuarial patient, graft and death‐censored graft survival or in allograft function. There were no differences in the 10‐year actuarial rates of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (30%, 26% and 20% in CSA/MMF, TAC^H/SIR^L and TAC^L/SIR^H) and chronic rejection (38%, 35% and 31% in CSA/MMF, TAC^H/SIR^L and TAC^L/SIR^H). Rates of new‐onset diabetes mellitus were higher with TAC^H/SIR^L (p = 0.04), and rates of anemia were higher with TAC^H/SIR^L and TAC^L/SIR^H (p = 0.04). No differences were found in the overall rates of 16 other post‐KT complications. These data indicate that RDP‐based protocol yield acceptable 10‐year outcomes, but side effects differ based on the maintenance regimen used and should be considered when optimizing immunosuppression following RDP.     

Impact of Medicare Coverage on Disparities in Access to Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation

In the setting of disparities in access to simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKT), Medicare coverage for this procedure was initiated July 1999. The impact of this change has not yet been studied. A national cohort of 22 190 type 1 diabetic candidates aged 18–55 for kidney transplantation (KT) alone or SPKT was analyzed. Before Medicare coverage, 57% of Caucasian, 36% of African American and 38% of Hispanic type 1 diabetics were registered for SPKT versus KT alone. After Medicare coverage, these proportions increased to 68%, 45% and 43%, respectively. The overall increase in SPKT registration rate was 27% (95% CI 1.16–1.38). As expected, the increase was more substantial in patients with Medicare primary insurance than those with private insurance (Relative Rate 1.18, 95% CI 1.09–1.28). However, racial disparities were unaffected by this policy change (African American vs. Caucasian: 0.97, 95% CI 0.87–1.09; Hispanic vs. Caucasian: 0.94, 95% CI 0.78–1.05). Even after Medicare coverage, African Americans and Hispanics had almost 30% lower SPKT registration rates than their Caucasian counterparts (95% CI 0.66–0.79 and 0.59–0.80, respectively). Medicare coverage for SPKT succeeded in increasing access for patients with Medicare, but did not affect the substantial racial disparities in access to this procedure.     

A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Tacrolimus-Based Therapy with or without Basiliximab in Pediatric Renal Transplantation

In a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of adding basiliximab to a standard tacrolimus-based regimen in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Patients < 18 years received tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids (TAS, n = 93) or tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids/basiliximab (TAS + B, n = 99). Target tacrolimus levels were 10-20 ng/mL between days 0-21 and 5-15 ng/mL thereafter. Steroid dosing was identical in both groups. Basiliximab was administered at 10 mg (patients < 40 kg) or 20 mg (patients > or = 40 kg) within 4 h of reperfusion; the same dose was repeated on day 4. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 20.4% (TAS) and 19.2% (TAS + B); steroid-resistant acute rejection rates were 3.2% and 3.0%, respectively. Patient survival was 100%; graft survival rates were 95% in both arms. The nature and incidence of adverse events were similar in both arms except toxic nephropathy and abdominal pain, which were significantly higher in the TAS + B arm (14.1% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.03 and 11.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.02; respectively). Median serum creatinine concentrations at 6 months were 86 micromol/L in the TAS and 91 micromol/L in the TAS + B arm; glomerular filtration rate was 79.4 and 77.6 (mL/min/1.73 m2), respectively. Adding basiliximab to a tacrolimus-based regimen is safe in pediatric patients, but does not improve clinical efficacy.     

Limited Dose Monoclonal IL-2R Antibody Induction Protocol after Primary Kidney Transplantation

This study prospectively compared immunoprophylaxis with a single intraoperative dose (2 mg/kg) of monoclonal interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibody vs. noninduction in kidney transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus (FK 506), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a prednisone-based immunosuppression regimen. One hundred recipients of first-kidney transplant were enrolled into the study to receive either anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody, daclizumab (2 mg/kg intraoperatively, limited anti-IL-2R) or no induction (control). Each patient also received oral tacrolimus (dosed to target trough level 10-15 ng/mL), MMF (500 mg bid) and prednisone. The primary efficacy end-point was the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection during the first 6 months post-transplant. The patients were also followed for 12-month graft function, and graft and patient survival rates. Other than the donor's age being significantly lower in the control group, both groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, gender, race, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR mismatch, panel reactive antibody (%PRA), cold ischemic time, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, causes of renal failure, and duration and modes of renal replacement therapy (RRT). During the first 6 months, episodes of first biopsy confirmed acute rejection was 3/50 (6%) in the limited anti-IL-2R group and 8/50 (16%) in the controls (p < 0.05). Twelve-month patient 100/98 (%) and graft survival 100/96 (%) were not statistically different. The group receiving limited anti-IL-2R did not have any adverse reactions. Our study demonstrates that a limited (single) 2 mg/kg immunoprophylaxis dose with monoclonal IL-2R antibody (daclizumab) when combined with tacrolimus/MMF/steroid allows significant reduction in early renal allograft rejection to the single digit level. The therapy with anti-IL-2R antibody is simple and is well tolerated.     

Elevated Incidence of Posttransplant Erythrocytosis After Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplantation

Posttransplant erythrocytosis (PTE) poses a potential risk of thrombosis in kidney transplantation. Clinical observation of our systemically drained simultaneous kidney pancreas transplant (S‐SPK) patients showed a higher incidence of PTE and need for phlebotomies. To evaluate the incidence of PTE we analyzed hematocrit (Hct) levels and frequency of phlebotomies in 94 SPK as compared to 174 living donor (LD) recipients and 53 type‐I diabetic with kidney transplant only. For study purposes we defined PTE as Hct >50% or the necessity for phlebotomies. Kaplan–Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between the transplant type and PTE. We found an increased incidence of PTE in SPK compared to LD (p < 0.001). In the multivariate model, SPK had a 5‐fold risk for the development of PTE (AHR 5.3, 95% CI 1.8, 15.9). The incidence of therapeutic phlebotomy was 13% among SPK patients and 4% in LD kidney recipients; 19 patients altogether. A total of 64 units were phlebotomized (48‐SPK and 16‐LD). Type I diabetic patients with a kidney transplant showed a 0% incidence of PTE. We observed a greater incidence of PTE and phlebotomies in S‐SPK compared to LD with kidney only transplant recipients.     

胰液膀胱引流式胰肾联合移植的远期疗效分析

目的：探讨胰液膀胱引流式胰肾联合移植的远期效果及其影响因素。方法：2001年9月～2006年1月共为14例患者行同种异体胰、十二指肠及肾联合移植术。胰腺移植于右髂窝,门静脉与髂外静脉做端侧吻合,包括腹腔动脉干和肠系膜上动脉的腹主动脉片与髂外动脉做端侧吻合,肾脏同常规肾移植于左侧髂窝。十二指肠与膀胱侧侧吻合。胰液采用膀胱外引流。术后应用他克莫司加霉酚酸酯加泼尼松三联免疫抑制方案。结果：9例患者术后胰肾功能恢复良好,早期无排斥反应发生。随访18～70个月,平均34个月。存活5年以上者4例,4年以上者5例,3年以上者6例,1年以上者9例,胰肾功能良好,血糖正常,均未使用降糖药。1例因超急性排斥反应术后第2天切除移植胰腺,随访至今2年肾功能良好。4例死亡,其中3例死于心血管事件、多器官衰竭,1例因十二指肠瘘死亡。结论：仔细完善的围手术期管理、预防和及时处理并发症、合理应用免疫抑制剂是影响胰肾联合移植患者和移植物长期存活的重要因素。     

Tacrolimus Monotherapy Without Steroids After Liver Transplantation – A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial

Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation (LT) is desirable in order to reduce steroid side effects. Between February 2000 and August 2004, 110 patients after LT were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Randomization was performed before LT. In all patients, tacrolimus was used without induction therapy. All patients received methylprednisolon for 14 days, thereafter a double-blinded medication containing either placebo (n = 56) or methylprednisolon (n = 54) for 6 months, which was completely stopped thereafter. End points were patient and graft survival, acute and chronic rejection, and incidence of steroid side effects during the first year after LT. One-year patient survival was 85.7% (placebo) and 88.8% (steroid) (p = 0.572). Twenty-seven (48.2%) and 19 (35.2%) patients experienced acute rejection (placebo versus steroid, respectively; p = 0.116). Two patients in the placebo group but none in the steroid group experienced chronic rejection (p = 0.257). The rates of side effects were (placebo versus steroid, respectively): CMV infection 25% versus 33% (p = 0.336), post-transplant diabetes 30% versus 53% (p = 0.024), hypertension 39% versus 52% (p = 0.248), hypercholesterolemia 10% versus 41% (p = 0.002) and hypertriglyceridemia 32% versus 54% (p = 0.046). In conclusion, early steroid withdrawal after LT is feasible under tacrolimus monotherapy without increased rejection rates and with a lower rate of side effects.     

A Phase I/II Randomized Open-Label Multicenter Trial of Efalizumab, a Humanized Anti-CD11a, Anti-LFA-1 in Renal Transplantation

Leukocyte function associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) has a multifaceted role in the immune response, including adhesion and trafficking of leukocytes, stabilizing the immune synapse of the MHC-TCR complex and providing costimulation signals. Monoclonal antibodies to the CD11a chain of LFA-1 have been seen to result in effective immunosuppression in experimental models. Efalizumab, a humanized IgG1 anti-CD11a, is approved for use in psoriasis and may provide effective immunosuppression in organ transplantation. Thirty-eight patients undergoing their first living donor or deceased renal transplant were randomized to receive efalizumab 0.5 or 2 mg/kg weekly subcutaneously for 12 weeks. Patients were maintained on full dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids or half dose cyclosporine, sirolimus and prednisone. At 6 months following transplant patient survival was 97% and graft survival was 95%. Clinical biopsy-proven acute rejection in the first 6 months after transplantation was confirmed in 4 of 38 patients (11%). Three patients (8%) developed post transplant lymphoproliferative disease, all treated with the higher dose efalizumab and full dose cyclosporine. The two doses of efalizumab resulted in comparable saturation and modulation of CD11a. This phase II trial suggests that efalizumab may warrant further investigation in transplantation.     

Minimization of Immunosuppressive Therapy After Renal Transplantation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Modern immunosuppressive regimens reduce the acute rejection rate by combining a cornerstone immunosuppressant like tacrolimus or cyclosporine with adjunctive agents like corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine, often associated with untoward side effects. A 6-month randomized study was conducted in 47 European centers. Triple therapy with tacrolimus (trough levels 5-15 ng/mL), corticosteroids (dosage 10 mg/day) and MMF (1 g/day) was administered for 3 months. From day 92, patients either continued with triple therapy (control, n = 277), or stopped steroids (n = 279), or stopped MMF (n = 277). Surrogate markers for long-term benefits were changes in lipid profiles and occurrence of hematological, gastrointestinal and infectious complications. The 6-month acute rejection incidence (biopsy-proven) was similar in all groups (17.0% vs. 15.1% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.744), although the incidence after month 3 was higher in the steroid stop group than in the two other groups. Mean reductions in total cholesterol (18.9 mg/dL [0.49 mmol/L]) and LDL-cholesterol (8.1 mg/dL [0.21 mmol/L]) between months 4 and 6 were greater in the steroid stop group (p < 0.001). Leukopenia (p = 0.0082), serious CMV infection (p = 0.024), anemia (p = NS) and diarrhea (p = NS) were less frequent in the MMF stop group. In a study population of immunologically low-risk patients' withdrawal of corticosteroids or MMF from a tacrolimus-based therapy at 3 months was feasible. A longer follow-up will be needed to confirm the expected advantages for the long-term outcome and to assess the long-term safety of this minimization of immunosuppressive therapy.     

Impact of Portal Venous Pancreas Graft Drainage on Kidney Graft Outcome in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Recipients Reported to UNOS

Clinical data on the potential immunologic impact of portal (PD) vs. systemic (SD) venous pancreas graft drainage on outcome remains controversial. We reviewed the UNOS database to study the effect of PD vs. SD on the incidence of kidney graft rejection and survival in first cadaveric simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients transplanted 1994-2001. We studied three groups: all SPK (n=6629, 13% PD) (group I), SPK on tacrolimus (n=3563, 17% PD) (group II), and SPK on tacrolimus performed at centers with significant PD experience (n=948, 46% PD) (group III). The cumulative kidney graft rejection incidence for PD vs. SD was only significantly different in group I (for PD vs. SD, respectively: at 6 months, 31% vs. 36% [p=0.015]; at 1 year, 37% vs. 43% [p=0.006]). Kidney graft survival was similar in all groups for PD vs. SD. Multivariate analysis of group III showed only transplantation during the earlier era (1994-96), but not SD, to be an independent risk factor for kidney graft rejection. Portal venous pancreas graft drainage does not affect kidney graft rejection and survival in SPK recipients on tacrolimus. Our data suggests that the efficacy of current immunosuppressive protocols and increasing center experience are clinically much more relevant than any potential immunologic advantage of portal venous drainage in SPK recipients.