Mutations of BRAF are associated with extensive hMLH1 promoter methylation in sporadic colorectal carcinomas

Activating mutations of BRAF have been frequently observed in microsatellite unstable (MSI+) colorectal carcinomas (CRCs), in which mutations of BRAF and KRAS are mutually exclusive. Previously, we reported that hypermethylation of hMLH1 might play an important role in the tumorigenesis of right-sided sporadic CRCs with MSI showing less frequency of KRAS/TP53 alteration. Therefore, we have assumed that BRAF mutations might be highly associated with hMLH1 methylation status rather than MSI status. In this study, mutations of BRAF and KRAS and their relationship with MSI and hMLH1 methylation status were examined in 140 resected specimens of CRC. The methylation status was classified into 3 types: full methylation (FM), partial methylation (PM) and nonmethylation (NM). Only FM closely linked to reduced expression of hMLH1 protein. BRAF mutations were found in 16 cases (11%), all leading to the production of BRAF(V599E). As for MSI status, BRAF mutations were found in 43% of MSI+ and 4% of MSI- cases (p < 0.0001). Among the MSI+ individuals, BRAF mutations were more frequent in cases with hMLH1 deficiency (58%) than those with hMSH2 deficiency (0%; p=0.02). Moreover, they were found in 69% of FM, 4% of PM and 4% of NM, revealing a striking difference between FM and the other 2 groups (FM vs. PM or NM; p < 0.0001). These findings suggest that BRAF activation may participate in the carcinogenesis of sporadic CRCs with hMLH1 hypermethylation in the proximal colon, independently of KRAS activation.     

Microsatellite instability caused by hMLH1 promoter methylation increases with tumor progression in right-sided sporadic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE: A subset of sporadic colorectal cancers (SCRCs) exhibits microsatellite instability (MSI). Most MSI in SCRCs is caused by hMLH1 inactivation due to promoter methylation. However, the role of MSI in the progression of SCRCs remains unclear. METHODS: Thirty-two intramucosal cancers and 63 cancers with submucosal invasion were assigned to group 1 (early-stage cancer), and 30 Dukes' B and 26 Dukes' C cancers to group 2 (advanced-stage cancer). hMLH1 promoter methylation status was determined by methylation-specific PCR. MSI was determined using five markers. hMLH1 expression was determined immunohistochemically. RESULTS: MSI was found in 1 of 95 (1.1%) tumors in group 1, compared with 4 of 56 (7.1%) tumors in group 2. In right-sided tumors, the overall frequency of hMLH1-methylation-positive tumors in group 1 was not significantly different from that in group 2 (17 of 43, 39.5%, vs. 9 of 23, 39.1%). In right-sided tumors with hMLH1 promoter methylation, the frequency of MSI-positive tumors in group 1 was significantly lower than that in group 2 (1 of 17, 5.9%, vs. 4 of 9, 44.4%, p=0.0081). CONCLUSION: The frequency of MSI caused by hMLH1 promoter methylation increases with tumor progression in right-sided SCRCs.     

Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter but no hMLH1 mutations in sporadic gastric carcinomas with high-level microsatellite instability

Microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumors from patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, principally hMSH2 and hMLH1. In contrast, somatic mutations in MMR genes are relatively rare in sporadic MSI(+) colon cancers. Rather, the majority of mutation-negative, MSI(+) cases involve hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter and subsequent lack of expression of hMLH1. The details of the mechanisms of this epigenetic gene silencing remain to be elucidated. In some colon cancer cell lines, hMLH1 promoter methylation is accompanied by mutation of 1 of the 2 alleles, whereas in other cell lines and tumors, such combinations have not been reported. To contribute to the characterization of MSI in gastric cancer and to directly investigate whether hMLH1 promoter methylation is accompanied by gene mutation in these cancers, we have analyzed 42 gastric tumors and corresponding normal tissue for MSI, hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter, and mutations in hMLH1 as well as hMSH2. We found that 10 (23.8%) of 42 cases of sporadic gastric cancer were MSI(+) and that 8 had at least 2 of 12 altered microsatellite loci. All samples with at least 2 altered loci exhibited methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region, but none had detectable mutations in hMLH1 or hMSH2. Our results confirm the importance of methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region in MSI(+) gastric tumors and suggest that methylation takes place in the absence of hMLH1 mutations in these tumors.     

Modest promoter methylation of E-cadherin gene in sporadic colorectal cancers: a quantitative analysis

Although E-cadherin expression is frequently reduced in colorectal cancers (CRCs), this does not appear to be due to gene mutation or allele loss. We investigated the hypothesis that promoter methylation could be responsible for suppression of E-cadherin expression in 142 pairs of sporadic CRCs and respective normal mucosae. E-cadherin expression was examined by Western blot. E-cadherin methylation at two promoter regions was quantitatively measured by methylation specific real time PCR (MethyLight). We found that E-cadherin protein levels were significantly lower in CRCs, even in Dukes' A tumors, compared to normal mucosae. Decreased E-cadherin protein expression in CRCs was an independent poor prognostic factor in multivariate disease-free survival analysis. However, the extent of DNA methylation was extremely modest at both regions of the E-cadherin promoter. There was no correlation between DNA methylation and E-cadherin protein levels in either tumors or matched normal tissues. These findings suggested that suppression of E-cadherin expression in CRCs is a significant event and is possibly involved in both carcinoma development and progression. However, our data did not support a crucial role of promoter methylation of the E-cadherin gene in the remarkable downregulation of E-cadherin expression in CRCs. Methylated E-cadherin gene as a CRC biomarker therefore needs further validation.     

散发性子宫内膜癌组织中错配修复基因hMLH1表达与微卫星不稳定性的相关性分析

目的：分析散发性子宫内膜癌组织中微卫星不稳定性（microsatellites instability,MSI）与错配修复基因hMLH1表达之间是否存在相关性。方法：应用免疫组化SP法检测40例子宫内膜癌、22例子宫内膜不典型增生、23例正常子宫内膜组织中错配修复基因hMLH1的表达;应用PCR方法检测子宫内膜癌中5个微卫星位点（D2S123、D10S197、D13S175、D10S215和D10S541）的微卫星不稳定性。结果：错配修复基因hMLH1在正常子宫内膜、子宫内膜不典型增生、子宫内膜癌组织中的表达逐渐下降,差异有统计学意义,χ^2=33.34,P=0.00;错配修复基因hMLH1蛋白的表达与内膜癌组织分化程度有关,χ^=7.98,P=0.02;hMLH1蛋白在内膜癌G1和G2期表达均为阳性;子宫内膜癌中微卫星不稳定性的发生与错配修复基因hMLH1的失表达密切相关,Pearson相关系数r=1,P=0.00。MSI在内膜癌组织中发生率显著高于正常子宫内膜,χ^2=5.26,P=0.02。结论：MSI是子宫内膜癌发生过程中重要的分子水平改变。hMLH1蛋白的表达有望成为筛查子宫内膜不典型增生向内膜癌发展的高危人群的一种手段,同时也可能成为判断内膜癌患者预后的指标。     

Promoter methylation and immunohistochemical expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in sporadic colorectal cancer: a study from India

To determine the etiological factors of human colorectal cancer (CRC) we assessed the frequency and prognostic significance of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes in conjunction with hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expression in 30 Indian CRC patients. The protein expression and promoter methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2; Mismatch Repair genes (MMR) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and methylation-specific PCR (MSP), respectively. A loss of hMLH1 expression was recognized in 4(13.3 %) and loss of hMSH2 expression was recognized in 2(6.6 %) of 30 CRC cases whereas 50 % tumors showed reduced expression of hMLH1 and 33.3 % showed reduced expression of hMSH2 protein. One tumor showed a loss of both hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression. Normal nuclear staining pattern of hMLH1 and hMSH2 was observed in almost all the adjoining and normal mucosa. Promoter hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene was detected in 15 of 30 CRC cases (50 %) and of hMSH2 gene was only in 3 of 30 CRC cases (10 %). No promoter methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes was observed in adjoining and normal mucosa. Combination of methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 gene was observed in two tumors (6.6 %). A significant correlation between histological grade of the tumor, methylation and expression of hMLH1 gene (p?<?0.05) was observed. Normal expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 was seen in all of the unmethylated tumors (100 %). Nuclear staining and promoter methylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 did not significantly influence survival. hMLH1 methylation was common and was significantly correlated with loss of hMLH1 protein expression. In contrast, hMSH2 methylation was infrequent. These findings suggest that the inactivation of MMR gene expression probably via hypermethylation may lead to inactivation of their functions which finally leads to tumor aggressiveness and the immunostaining of hMLH1 protein can be used as a prognostic factor for determining the grade of the tumor.     

hMLH1 promoter methylation is an early event in oral cancer

Promoter methylation is believed to inactivate the expression of hMLH1. This process has been implicated in the tumorigenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the profile of hMLH1 methylation and protein expression in OSCC. The matched case-control study included 50 OSCC cases and 200 controls, with a median of age 64 (Q?-Q? 54-71) years. Protein expression was determined by immunohistochemical staining, and hMLH1 gene promoter methylation was analyzed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP). A conditional logistic regression model for risk factors was built for OSCC cases and matched controls. Promoter methylation of hMLH1 was detected in 38 (76%) OSCC cases, but in none of the control samples. Of the 38 OSCC samples with promoter methylation, 12 (32%) were negative for hMLH1 protein, and corresponded to early clinical stages (10 in stage II and 2 in stage I). All 12 unmethylated samples showed positive stain for hMLH1. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed an OR of 16.54 (IC 95%: 1.69-161.68, p=0.016) for methylation of the hMLH1 gene and early stages of OSCC, adjusting by gender and tobacco use. This study showed a high frequency of hMLH1 promoter methylation that occurred in most of the early stage cases and in about half of the late stage cases. It is proposed that hMLH1 promoter methylation is an early event that is maintained during tumor progression.     

Methylation of hMLH1 in a population-based series of endometrial carcinomas.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a characteristic feature of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and is also observed in sporadic colorectal and endometrial cancers. Alterations in the mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 are important for the development of MSI. It has recently been demonstrated that hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter region is associated with MSI and appears to be a common mechanism for gene inactivation. For endometrial carcinoma, however, previous studies have been relatively small and have not been population based. We therefore wanted to assess the frequency and prognostic significance of hypermethylation of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes in conjunction with hMLH1 protein expression in a prospective and population-based series of endometrial carcinoma patients with known MSI status and complete follow-up. A total of 138 patients were studied, and methylation of hMLH1 was found in 23% of tumors with conclusive results, whereas methylation of hMSH2 was seen in only 1% of tumors. Methylation of hMLH1 was significantly correlated with MSI (P < 0.001). Loss of nuclear staining of hMLH1 protein was seen in 14% of the cases and was significantly correlated with hMLH1 methylation and MSI (P < 0.001). Normal expression of hMLH1 was seen in all of the unmethylated tumors (100%). Of the 14 MSI-positive tumors that were also methylated, all but 1 (93%) showed a loss of nuclear expression of hMLH1. None of the tumors with loss of hMLH1 expression or hMLH1 methylation were aneuploid (P for both < or = 0.05), and loss of hMLH1 expression and hMLH1 methylation was significantly correlated with lack of p53 overexpression (P for both < or = 0.05). Nuclear hMLH1 staining and hMLH1 methylation did not significantly influence survival. In conclusion, hMLH1 methylation was common and was significantly correlated with loss of hMLH1 protein expression, MSI, diploid tumors, and lack of p53 overexpression. In contrast, hMSH2 methylation was infrequent in this prospective and population-based series of endometrial carcinomas.     

A role for methylation of the hMLH1 promoter in loss of hMLH1 expression and drug resistance in ovarian cancer.

Experimental evidence from several sources has identified a link between mismatch repair deficiency and cytotoxic drug resistance. Selection for cisplatin resistance in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, results in loss of expression of the mismatch repair protein hMLH1 in most (90%) of the resultant cisplatin-resistant cell lines. Here we demonstrate that the cisplatin sensitive parental cell line displays methylation of the promoter of only one hMLH1 allele, but that the resistant cell lines all exhibit hyper-methylation of the promoters of both hMLH1 alleles. Full methylation of all sites tested was found to be invariably associated with loss of hMLH1 expression, whereas a partial increase in methylation appears compatible with either loss or maintenance of expression. In addition treatment of two of the resistant cell lines with 5-azacytidine, a known inhibitor of methylation, results in re-expression of hMLH1. Clonogenic assays demonstrate that the 5-azacytidine treated cells show increased sensitivity to cisplatin. Furthermore, 12.5% (3/ 24) of ovarian tumours show hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. Expression of hMLH1 is absent in the tumours that are hypermethylated, while all the unmethylated tumours still express the protein. This analysis suggests that methylation of the hMLH1 promoter may be a common mechanism for loss of hMLH1 expression, and possibly for cisplatin-resistance, in ovarian cancer.     

Microsatellite instability,MLH1 promoter methylation,and BRAF mutation analysis in sporadic colorectal cancers of different ethnic groups in Israel

BACKGROUND:

The molecular mechanisms that underlie colorectal cancer (CRC) include microsatellite instability (MSI), chromosomal instability, and the CpG island methylator phenotype. There is evidence to suggest that CRC incidence varies among different ethnic populations worldwide. The authors of this report hypothesized that environmental factors and lifestyle differences among various ethnic groups may differentially influence the epigenetic regulation of tumor suppressor genes in CRC.

METHODS:

In the current study, microdissection and DNA extraction were performed on 128 samples of CRC from Israeli patients (85 Jews and 43 Arabs). MSI analysis, mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) and mutS homolog 2 (MSH2) protein expression levels, and MLH1 promoter methylation were investigated by combined bisulfite restriction analysis. The v‐raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) valine‐to‐glutamic acid mutation at residue 600 was investigated by direct DNA sequencing.

RESULTS:

High MSI (MSI‐H), MLH1 methylation, and BRAF mutations were observed in 11.6%, 9.4%, and 23.5% of Jews, respectively, and in 16.2%, 17.6%, and 20.9% of Arabs, respectively (P value nonsignificant). MLH1 promoter methylation was observed in 22.6% of microsatellite‐stable (MSS) tumors and in 53.8% of MSI‐H tumors (P < .015). Extensive methylation (covering both 5′ and 3′ promoter regions) was present in all MSI‐H tumors with loss of MLH1 expression. BRAF mutation was observed in 15.6% and 46.1% of MSS tumors and MSI‐H tumors, respectively (P < .007). BRAF mutation was observed in 66%, 22.2%, and 14.7% of patients who had tumors with extensive MLH1 promoter methylation, methylation of the 5′ region alone, or without methylation, respectively (P < .006).

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no difference in molecular signatures examined between Jewish and Arab patients with CRC in Israel. Extensive promoter methylation was associated with MLH1 inactivation, MSI, and BRAF mutation. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

胃癌组织hMLH1启动子甲基化是造成其蛋白表达降低的主要原因

目的：通过研究胃癌中错配修复基因hMLH1启动子区5CpG岛甲基化及蛋白表达情况，探讨hMLH1启动子Ⅸ甲基化对蛋白表达的影响及在胃癌发病中的作用。方法：收集诊断明确且未经放化疗的胃癌手术切除标本41例及同病例癌旁黏膜。应用免疫组化SP法检测标本hMLH1蛋白表达情况。应用甲基化特异性PCR（MSP）榆测标本hMLH1启动子区甲基化情况。结果：胃癌组与癌旁组，hMLH1蛋白阳性表达率分别为58．54％（24／41）和80．49％（33／41）（P〈0．05）；启动子甲基化率分别为80．49％（33／41）和24．39％（10／41）（P〈0．05）；完全甲基化率分别为41．46％（17／41）和19．51％（8／41）（P〈0．05）；部分甲基化率分别为39．02％（16／41）和4．88％（2／41）（P〈0．05）。无论胃癌组织还是癌旁组织，完全甲基化病例均出现hMLH1蛋白表达缺失，部分甲基化病例和启动子未甲基化病例均有hMLH1蛋白表达。hMLHI基因启动子甲基化率与胃癌患者性别、年龄、癌组织分化程度、浸润深度和淋巴结转移均无明显相关性（P〉0．05）。结论：hM—LH1基因启动子甲基化是导致hMLH1蛋白表达降低的主要原因；胃黏膜hMLH1蛋白表达降低有助于胃癌的预警。     

肺癌组织中错配修复基因hMLH1 启动子甲基化状态分析

目的 探讨肺癌组织中错配修复基因ｈＭＬＨ１启动子甲基化状态及其与蛋白表达的关系。方法 用ＨｐａⅡ酶切ＰＣＲ及ＳＰ免疫组织化学方法,分析５０例肺癌标本ｈＭＬＨ１启动子甲基化状态及蛋白表达。结果 ｈＭＬＨ１启动子甲基化有１６例,占３２．０％（１６／５０）。ｈＭＬＨ１启动甲基化与性别、吸烟状态及临床病理无明显的相关性。ｈＭＬＨ１蛋白表达阴性的１４例中,１１例有甲基化（７８．６％）;而３２例蛋白表达阳性者中,只有５例甲基化（１５．６％）。结论 ｈＭＬＨ１启动子区在肺癌组织中有中等频率的甲基化,是ｈＭＬＨ１蛋白表达降低的主要原因之一。     

错配修复基因hMLH1和hMSH2在散发性大肠癌中的表达及其意义

目的 探讨错配修复基因hMLH1和hMSH2在散发性大肠癌(SCC)组织中的表达及其临床意义.方法 采用免疫组化Max Vision二步法对63例SCC标本中的癌组织、距癌灶3 cm以外的癌旁组织、距癌灶10 cm以外的正常组织中hMLH1和hMSH2蛋白的表达进行检测.结果 hMLH1蛋白在63例正常大肠组织、癌旁组织和SCC组织中的阳性表达率分别为95.2%、85.7%和81.0%,hMLH1蛋白在SCC组织中的阳性表达率明显低于正常大肠组织(P＜0.05).hMSH2蛋白在63例正常大肠组织、癌旁组织和SCC组织中的阳性表达率分别为76.2%、66.7%和52.4%,hMSH2蛋白在SCC组织中的阳性表达率明显低于正常大肠组织(P＜0.01).hMLH1蛋白在＜60岁的SCC患者组织中的阳性表达率(100%)明显高于≥60岁的SCC患者组织(75.0%,P＜0.05),在有淋巴结转移的SCC组织中的阳性表达率(50.0%)明显低于无淋巴结转移的SCC组织(93.3%,P＜0.05).hMSH2蛋白在＜60岁的SCC患者组织中的阳性表达率(80.0%)明显高于≥60岁的SCC患者组织(43.8%,P＜0.05),在癌组织浸润至肠壁浆膜层SCC组织中的阳性表达率(61.5%)明显高于浸润至黏膜下层和肌层的SCC组织(37.5%,P＜0.05).SCC组织中hMLH1和hMSH2蛋白的表达呈正相关关系(r=0.254,P＜0.01).结论 hMLH1和hMSH2蛋白在SCC组织中的表达均有一定的缺失,并且与患者的年龄、淋巴结转移和癌组织浸润的范围有关.hMLH1和hMSH2基因可以作为临床预测和判断SCC发生和发展有用的实验室指标.     

K-ras mutations and RASSF1A promoter methylation in colorectal cancer

Human cancer is characterized by genetic and epigenetic alterations. In this study we provide evidence for the interruption of Ras signaling in sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) by either genetic activation of the K-ras oncogene or epigenetic silencing of the putative tumor suppressor gene RASSF1A. Paraffin embedded tumor tissue samples from 222 sporadic CRC patients were analysed for K-ras codon 12 and codon 13 activating mutations and RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation. Overall, K-ras mutations were observed in 87 of 222 (39%) and RASSF1A methylation was observed in 45 of 222 (20%) of CRCs. Mutation of K-ras alone was detected in 76 of 222 (34%) CRCs. RASSF1A promoter methylation with wild-type K-ras was observed in 34 of 222 (15%) CRCs. In 101 of 222 (46%) CRCs neither K-ras mutations nor RASSF1A methylation was observed and 11 of 222 (5%) CRCs showed both K-ras mutations and RASSF1A methylation. These data show that the majority of the studied CRCs with K-ras mutations lack RASSF1A promoter methylation, an event which occurs predominantly in K-ras wild-type CRCs (P=0.023, Chi-square test).     

CpG methylation of MGMT and hMLH1 promoter in hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis viral infection

Inactivations of DNA repair genes, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and hMLH1, by promoter hypermethylation have been reported in several types of primary human neoplasia. This epigenetic inactivation mechanism remains elusive in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To investigate the relation between the expression of MGMT and hMLH1 and the CpG methylation within their promoters in HCCs with or without hepatitis viral infection, we performed immunohistochemistry and urea/bisulphite sequencing on 46 HCCs, corresponding noncancerous tissues, and 20 normal liver tissues. MGMT- and hMLH1-negative HCCs were 60.9% (28 out of 46) and 21.8% (10 out of 46), respectively. HCCs lacking both proteins were 10.9% (five out of 46). The frequency and extent of CpG methylation in the MGMT promoter increased along with hepatitis viral infection and pathological progression. MGMT-negative tumours showed very frequent and widespread methylation in the promoter compared with MGMT-positive tumours. Half of the hMLH1-negative HCCs showed promoter hypermethylation. These data suggested that MGMT gene silencing in a subset of HCCs was likely caused by epigenetic alteration, such as promoter hypermethylation, and that the promoter hypermethylation silenced the hMLH1 gene in half of the hMLH1-negative tumours. A correlation between the promoter methylation status and viral infection, although it was weak, intimated that hepatitis viral infections could play a role in the CpG methylation of the MGMT promoter.     

MutL homolog 1 methylation and microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal tumors among Filipinos

BACKGROUNDColorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in terms of incidence and second in mortality worldwide. In CRC, the silencing of mismatch repair genes, including the mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) has been linked to microsatellite instability (MSI), the lengthening or shortening of microsatellite repeats. Very limited data have been presented so far on the link of hMLH1 methylation and MSI in Southeast Asia populations with sporadic CRC, and on its clinical significance.AIMTo investigate the significance of the MSI status and hMLH1 methylation in CRC Filipino patients.METHODSFifty-four sporadic CRC patients with complete clinical data were included in this study. Genomic DNA from CRC tumor biopsies and their normal tissue counterparts were profiled for MSI by high resolution melting (HRM) analysis using the Bethesda Panel of Markers (BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346, and D17S250). hMLH1 methylation screening was performed using bisulfite conversion and methylation specific polymerase chain reaction. Statistical analysis was conducted to calculate their associations to clinicopathological characteristics and survival relevance (Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test).RESULTS hMLH1 methylation was observed in 9% and 35% of CRC and normal samples, respectively. Higher incidence of consistently methylated hMLH1 found in both normal and CRC was noticed for relation to location of tumor (P < 0.05). As for MSI status, D2S123 the most common unstable microsatellite and MSI-high (MSI-H) was the most common MSI profile, counted for 46% and 50% of normal and CRC tissues, respectively. The presence of MSI-low (MSI-L) and microsatellite stable (MSS) was 43% and 11% for normal, and 31% and 19% for CRC samples. The mean month of patients’ survival was shorter in patients whose normal and tumor tissues had methylated compared to those with unmethylated hMLH1 and with MSI-H compared to those with MSI-L/MSS (P < 0.05). This was supported by significant difference in Kaplan-Meier with log-rank analysis. This data indicated that hMLH1 methylation and high MSI status have prognostic value.CONCLUSIONThis study showed the clinical significance of hMLH1 methylation and MSI status in sporadic CRC Filipino patients, especially in the normal part of the tumor.     

女性散发性基底细胞型乳腺癌ERα启动子甲基化的研究

目的:探讨ERα甲基化与基底细胞型乳腺癌发生发展的相关性。方法:用甲基化PCR研究60例散发性基底型乳腺癌ERα启动子甲基化情况,并研究其与临床病因素之间的关系。结果:女性散发性基底细胞型乳腺癌组织中ERα基因启动子甲基化发生率为80.0%(48/60)。ERα基因启动子甲基化与淋巴结转移情况、肿瘤分期、p53蛋白、BRCA-1蛋白和BRCA-2蛋白表达情况有相关性,与患者年龄及绝经状态无关。结论:ERα基因启动子甲基化在基底细胞型乳腺癌发生发展中可能起重要作用。