Patients' decision-making strategies for managing postoperative pain.

Despite technological advances, many postoperative patients continue to suffer unrelieved pain. The aim of this study was to identify the strategies used by postoperative patients to bring about pain management decisions. A single-group noncomparative study design was chosen using observations as the means of examining pain activities in 2 surgical units of a metropolitan teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. A total of 52 nurses and 312 patients participated in the study, and 316 pain activities were observed. The most common strategy used was patients acting as a passive recipient for pain relief (60%), whereas problem solving (23%) and active negotiation (17%) were less commonly used. Patients in this study were admitted for surgical treatment of a particular condition, and their subsequent pain was specifically related to this acute event. Therefore, the lack of familiarity of the situation and the severity of pain experienced may have encouraged passivity. Patients may have also felt uncertain about how to approach the pain decision, preferring to defer to nurses. Because increased pain levels can be associated with fear, patients could have been unwilling to speak with nurses to discuss their need for pain relief. PERSPECTIVE: This paper shows that patient decision making for postoperative pain relief largely involves the use of passive requests, compared with problem solving and active negotiation. Effective communication must be supported between health professionals and patients if shared understandings about treatment options are to become a reality.     

Psychiatric Patients: How Can We Decide if You Are in Pain?

How do psychiatric nurses make decisions about pain management for hospitalized psychiatric patients? This is the question addressed by this research. Using an exploratory, naturalistic interview approach, 20 nurses and managers in varied settings described their decision making when providing pain relief. Analysis of these narratives indicates that decision making about pain, in this unique context, is influenced by a number of intrapersonal and interpersonal factors such as the patients' needs, history, and diagnosis; nurses' beliefs about pain tolerance and drug addiction; collegial pressure; and unit safety. For example, diagnosis and patient history impact pain relief negatively, while the responsibility to maintain a safe environment imposes pressure to administer medication. Although, in a psychiatric unit, the nurse-patient relationship is essential to the healing process, nurses often face a dilemma as to whether the pain medication will contribute to healing or exacerbate the patient's issues. In psychiatric wards, the means of recovery are far less clear, tangible, and immediate than in other clinical settings. Recommendations are made for better preparing and supporting nurses to work effectively in these practice settings where pain relief is confounded by addiction and psychiatric diagnoses.     

Nurses' involvement in end-of-life decisions

In Dutch healthcare, patients and physicians are responsible for medical end-of-life decisions. These include nontreatment decisions, withholding or withdrawing parenteral hydration and nutrition where the patient can no longer drink or eat, relieving pain and other symptoms with drugs that might shorten life, euthanasia, and physician-assisted suicide. The objective of this study is to investigate the views of nurses on their role with regard to discussing these kinds of decisions, as well as their actual role in the decision-making process. Nurses (n = 489) involved in palliative terminal care answered questions about their preferred and actual role in end-of-life decision-making processes. Nurses want to be involved in making end-of-life decisions, but this depends partly on the kind of decision that has to be taken. When caring for terminal patients, 62% of the nurses usually talk about such decisions with patients or their families. Three-quarters of the nurses had been involved in an end-of-life decision-making process in the previous 2 years, mostly by talking with the physician and the patient's family. It is concluded that physicians should discuss these decisions with nurses more often. The finding that characteristics of the nurses influence their role in end-of-life decision-making processes emphasizes the importance of developing mechanisms to ensure that end-of-life decisions are made in a consistent manner and do not depend on the demographic characteristics of nurses.     

The Influence of Race and Gender on Nursing Care Decisions: A Pain Management Intervention

Background: Understanding whether a patient's race or gender and/or the nurse's race or gender influence how nurses form care decisions can contribute to exploration of methods that can positively affect disparate treatment. Aims: This research examined how the variables of race and gender of both the nurse and the patient influence nurses' decision making about pain management. Design: A randomized four-group post-test–only experimental design was used to examine the variables and variable interactions. Settings: An investigator-developed case vignette tool hosted online was used to obtain data about nursing pain management decisions. The vignette intervention was developed to simulate four exact patient scenarios that differed only by patient race and gender. Participants/Subjects: A quota sample of 400 nurses was recruited using a self-selected face-to-face recruitment technique. Methods: A four-way between-groups analysis of variance assessed whether the gender of the nurse, race of the nurse, gender of the patient, or race of the patient made any differences in the dose intensity of pain medications selected by the nurse sample. Results: No significant interactions were noted between any combinations of the four independent variables. A significant main effect was noted in medication intensity for nurse gender (F [1,384] = 9.75, p = .002). Conclusions: Data trends suggested that gender stereotypes about how patients managed pain played a role in dose intensity decisions because female patients on average were given higher doses of pain medication than male patients were by all the nurses in the study. Further research is needed in this complex area of study.     

The decision making of heart failure specialist nurses in clinical practice

Aims and objectives. To explore decision processes and types of decisions made by heart failure specialist nurses. Background. Heart failure specialist nurses are key to the management of patients with heart failure in the community. In previous studies heart failure specialist nurses have reported difficulty in developing decision making skills. Cognitive continuum theory can be used to examine the relationship between decision tasks and the processes used by heart failure specialist nurses to make decisions. Design. A qualitative study using non‐participant observation and semi‐structured interviews. Methods.  Six heart failure specialist nurses were observed while they carried out consultations with three patients each (n = 18). Twelve heart failure specialist nurses were interviewed about their decision making in practice. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results. Two areas of decision making were identified by heart failure specialist nurses as key; pharmacological management and managing patients in the palliative phase of their condition. Pharmacological management decisions involved the trading off of risks and benefits of titrating medication, with nurses using internalised guidelines to inform their practice. In contrast, nurses relied on support from other health care professionals when making decisions about a patient’s need for palliative care. Conclusions. Medication titration decisions have a mixture of intuition and analysis inducing features making them amenable to the use of decision tools. The timing of the need for palliative care is less predictable, suggesting an intuitive approach to decision making may be more appropriate. Relevance to clinical practice. There are several strategies that could be used to improve the match between the decisions that heart failure specialist nurses take and the decision processes they use. These include the development of more tailored decision support tools for medication titration decisions and the provision of structured decision aids for assessing patients’ need for palliative care.     

Patient approaches to clinical conversations in the palliative care setting

AIM: The aim of this paper is to report a study exploring patients' understanding of their discussions about end-of-life care with nurses in a palliative care setting. BACKGROUND: It is assumed that nurses are central players in patients' major decisions about their care, yet minimal information is available about the complexity of patient-nurse interaction in palliative care, and patients' views of the impact of such interactions on decisions that are made. METHOD: A modified version of grounded theory was used to collect and analyse interview data collected in 2001-2002 with a convenience sample of 11 patients in a palliative care setting. Interviews focused on each patient's selection of two decisions they had made in the past 6 months that had involved nurses in the decision-making process. FINDINGS: Processes were identified between nurses and patients that facilitated or blocked open discussion and discernment of patients' preferences for care. Six approaches that patients used in their conversations with nurses about their care: wait and see, quiet acceptance, active acceptance, tolerating bossiness, negotiation and being adamant. These approaches are described in terms of how they assisted or impeded autonomous decision-making. CONCLUSION: Palliative care patients often adopt passive roles and tend not to engage in important decision-making, for various reasons. Professionals need to be made aware of this, and should facilitate an open, trusting relationship with patients in order to ensure that important information passes freely in both directions. Professionals should learn to prioritize patient participation and negotiation in their work. With further research, it should be possible to identify the factors that will allow patients to take a more pro-active role in making decisions about their care, where desired.     

A structured literature review of pain assessment and management of patients with chronic kidney disease

Aims and objectives. This paper reviews the literature concerning nurses’ assessment and management of pain in adult patients with chronic kidney disease, and proposes implications for clinical practice to support the control of pain in these patients. Background. Chronic kidney disease is a worldwide public health concern with increasing incidence and prevalence, poor patient outcomes and high cost. Patients with kidney disease often experience pain. Optimal pain assessment and management are key clinical activities; however, inadequate pain control by health professionals persists. Renal failure compounds this problem because of the small margin between pain relief and toxicity, and the patient's concomitant health problems. Conclusions. The literature review uses 93 articles that were published in medical‐ and other health‐related journals, including 12 medical and pharmaceutical studies specifically relating to pain control in adults with kidney disease. Very little research has been conducted on pain in patients with kidney disease prior to requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation for survival. However, past research showed pain is common and analgesics are underprescribed in patients on dialysis in end‐stage kidney disease. The review indicates that an interest in nephrotoxicity and analgesic‐induced morbidity dominates over an interest in pain relief in patients with kidney disease. Most analgesics are excreted renally or by the liver, and the use of simple analgesics such as paracetamol is cautioned. Relevance to clinical practice. Findings from the literature review highlight specific difficulties relating to effective pain control in patients with chronic kidney disease. Research is required to identify and overcome barriers to effective pain management, including the development of specific tools to facilitate interventions that optimize analgesic outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease.     

Postsurgical pain relief: Patients' status and nurses' medication choices

This study consisted of two interrelated parts. In the first part, the adequacy of pain relief in hospitalized post-surgical patients was assessed and described and in the second part ways in which nurses on the same units chose analgesic medications were examined and analyzed. Pain was considered a subjective experience. Patients were interviewed, and their charts reviewed on the third postoperative day. The sample included 109 patients in 5 central Illinois hospitals. After all patient interviews were completed, 121 nurses on the same units responded to a questionnaire which included clinical vignettes. Results of the patient interviews indicated that 75.2% of these patients were in moderate or marked pain distress and that a general question did not adequately assess pain. Chart review indicated that these patients were actually receiving less narcotic analgesics than they could receive. Nurses were overly concerned about the possibility of addiction; choices of analgesic medications seemed irrational; and knowledge of the drugs was inadequate. Moreover, these nurses indicated that complete pain relief after surgery was not their major goal. In 2 sets of identical vignettes where the only difference was the sex of the patient, nurses selected less medication for pain for female patients (P < 0.001 and P < 0.025 respectively). Factors that nurses consider in administering and choosing postoperative analgesia are described.     

Using nitrous oxide and oxygen to control pain in primary care

Improving pain control is an area where nurses have the clinical expertise to make a significant difference to the quality of patient care. The inhaled analgesic 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen is ideal for use when undertaking short, potentially painful procedures as it is a safe and effective method of pain relief. Many patients in the community require procedures that can be extremely painful. This article describes how this analgesic has been successfully introduced throughout a PCT, through collaborative working between acute pain nurses based in the hospital setting and community nurses.     

Nurses' assessments and management of pain in children having orthopedic surgery

The specific aims of this research project were to (a) describe selected verbal, nonverbal, and physiological arousal indicators of the child's pain; (b) describe which pain indicators were most influential to nurses in decision-making about interventions for managing the child's pain; (c) describe pain interventions used by nurses; (d) compare postoperative analgesic orders to recommended dosages for the children; and (e) explore relationships between the child's self-report of pain and medication dosages administered. Subjects included 19 children aged 5-17 years who experienced 20 orthopedic surgical procedures (one child had two surgeries one week apart). Data were collected by staff nurses for the first five days after surgery. Pain levels were reported using the Oucher Scale. Postoperative pain was reported at moderate levels and showed only a gradual decrease throughout the hospital stay. Nonverbal pain indicators included crying and tense face. The child's complaint of pain and reported Oucher scores were most influential in influencing nurses to intervene in the child's pain. Nonpharmacological comfort measures included positioning and reassurance. All children received medications for pain; 49% of the orders were within the recommended therapeutic dosage range. A small but significant correlation was found between the child's reported pain level and the morphine equivalents of pain medication received. Recommendations included development of nursing flow charts that provide space to record pain levels and nursing interventions, in-service education for nurses on nonpharmacological interventions, and further research with a larger sample and a single pain rating scale.     

From hospital to home care: a randomized controlled trial of a Pain Education Programme for cancer patients with chronic pain

AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate the role of district nurses in the care of cancer patients with chronic pain at home, as well as the effects of a Pain Education Programme for patients and their district nurses. The Pain Education Programme consisted of a tailored multi-method approach in which they were educated about pain, instructed how to report pain, and how to contact health care providers. BACKGROUND: No educational programs for patients in pain have been studied in outpatients nor integrated with the home care provided. DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and four patients and their 115 district nurses were enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal, randomized controlled study. The primary outcome of interest was type of care provided by district nurses, satisfaction with the pain treatment, and agreement in estimating patients' pain intensity. RESULTS: Results showed that continuity of care was poor as only 36% of the district nurses were informed about patients' pain by hospital nurses. Pain was rarely the reason for referring the patient to district nursing after discharge. Although pain control was not a main reason for district nurses to visit a patient, pain was a subject for discussion in 76% of visits. Besides discussing the pain problem with patients, district nurses provided only a few pain-relieving interventions. District nurses randomized to the intervention group significantly better estimated patients' pain intensity, and were more satisfied about patients' pain treatment, but no differences were found in their assessment of patients' pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a significant but moderate effect of the Pain Education Programme, with district nurses only playing a minor role in the treatment of cancer pain.     

What patients with abdominal pain expect about pain relief in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal pain is the leading cause of patient visits to the emergency department. Although patients present to the emergency department in search of relief from pain, few experience complete pain relief. The purpose of this study was to describe patients' expectations for pain relief and how communication of their pain to nurses and physicians affected their overall pain relief. METHODS: Questionnaires were completed by patients who reported abdominal pain and by their primary nurse and physician. Numeric rating scales were used to rate pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) and actual and expected pain relief (0 = no pain relief, 10 = complete relief). RESULTS: Forty-four percent of patients reported that they expected complete relief of their abdominal pain. Over 98% of the patients told a provider that they were in pain, but only 33.3% asked for pain medication. No significant differences were found between the patients who asked for pain medication and those who did not in patients' expectation scores or relief scores. DISCUSSION: The results of this study showed that patients with abdominal pain have high expectations for pain relief; however, their expectations were not associated with their tendency to ask for pain medication or report actual relief of pain.     

Documentation of medication management by graduate nurses in patient progress notes: a way forward for patient safety

Nursing documentation provides evidence of nurses' management, the patient response, and evaluation of care. The aim of the study was to examine how graduate nurses document their medication management in the progress notes. A prospective clinical audit of patient medication charts and the progress notes made by 12 graduate nurses was undertaken. Graduate nurses were also individually interviewed and asked clarifying questions about their medication management. Documentation was examined based on four areas: assessment, planning care, administration of medications, and evaluating outcomes of medications. Recorded information about assessment focused on cues of a biomedical rather than a psychosocial nature. Planning care involved non-specific documentation of discharge planning needs, and little information about communication with doctors, pharmacists, nurses, patients and next of kin. Administration of medications included details about the names of medications given to patients, but no information about medication education provided to patients during this time. Evaluation of outcomes of medication administration was poorly documented. Graduate nurses tended to focus on assessing medications before their administration without considering how the patient responded to treatment. Recommendations are proposed for improving the quality of graduate nurses' progress notes. These recommendations include implementing and evaluating protocols that link nurses' decision-making to documentation processes. Adopting a supportive multidisciplinary approach to quality improvement and providing education that emphasises written documentation of verbal communication are also recommended.     

Development and testing of the theory of collaborative decision-making in nursing practice for triads

BACKGROUND: Although nurses depend heavily on informal family caregivers to provide care to clients and to be involved in care planning and decision-making, no nursing theories that include the client, the caregiver, and the nurse were available to guide collaborative care planning and decision-making. AIM: The purpose of this paper is to describe the construction and initial testing of the theory of collaborative decision-making in nursing practice for a triad. The theory represents an extension of Kim's theory of collaborative decision-making in nursing practice. Kim's theory was developed to describe and explain collaborative decision-making in a dyad (client and nurse). The inclusion of a third person (family caregiver) in the theory required the addition of concepts about the caregiver, coalition formation, and nurse and caregiver outcomes. The expansion of Kim's dyadic theory to a triadic theory was achieved by means of a modified version of the theory derivation process described by Walker and Avant. CONCLUSIONS: The theory of collaborative decision-making in nursing practice for a triad can be used to guide further research and clinical practice. The theory provides a framework for researchers who are interested in studying the effects of collaboration regarding decision-making among nurses, family caregivers, and clients. The initial testing of the new theory in home health care nursing revealed variety in the nature of the client-caregiver-nurse relationships, the many processes used by the nurses in proceeding with the home visits, a multitude of decisions considered and different collaborative, noncollaborative, and coalition-forming interactions. The limited evidence of the empirical adequacy of the theory precludes development of definitive guidelines for clinical practice at this time. More studies are required before clinical practice guidelines can be developed.     

Nurses decision-making in clinical practice

AIM: To identify what decisions nurses make in medical, surgical and critical care areas and compare the results. METHOD: A clinical decision-making questionnaire (CDMQ) consisting of 15 statements was developed. A total of 60 nurses completed the questionnaire: 20 from each of three clinical areas. RESULTS: Most nurses, in all specialties, regularly made clinical decisions on direct patient care, which included providing basic nursing care and psychological support, and teaching patients and/or family members. Although nurses in all specialties regularly managed the work environment, they did not make decisions on the ward or unit budget, supervise junior staff or mentor student nurses. Critical care nurses regularly made decisions on their extended roles, such as acting in emergency situations and deciding to change patient medication, while medical and surgical nurses only did this occasionally. Length of clinical experience is significantly related to the frequency of decision-making. CONCLUSION: The decisions nurses make are directly related to the clinical areas in which they work. However, it would be interesting to know if nurses showed particular aptitudes for different types and levels of decision-making and if this is related to other factors such as personality, education and experience in nursing.     

Alleviation of pain and symptoms with a life-shortening intention

This article reports the findings of a study into the role of Dutch nurses in the alleviation of pain and symptoms with a life-shortening intention, conducted as part of a study into the role of nurses in medical end-of-life decisions. A questionnaire survey was carried out using a population of 1509 nurses who were employed in hospitals, home care organizations and nursing homes. The response rate was 82.0%; 78.1% (1179) were suitable for analysis. The results show that in about half of the cases (55.8%) nurses were involved in the decision making by the physician and that nurses were frequently (81.5%) involved in administering the medication. The authors' conclusion is that alleviation of pain and symptoms with a life-shortening intention represents a ;grey' area, in which physicians and nurses act on the basis of personal ethical norms rather than legal rules, professional guidelines or shared moral values.     

Evaluation of Nurses' Self-Insight Into Their Pain Assessment and Treatment Decisions

Research generally indicates that providers demonstrate modest insight into their clinical decision processes. In a previous study utilizing virtual human (VH) technology, we found that patient demographic characteristics and facial expressions of pain were statistically significant predictors of many nurses' pain-related decisions. The current study examined the correspondence between the statistically identified and self-reported influences of contextual information on pain-related decisions. Fifty-four nurses viewed vignettes containing a video of a VH patient and text describing a postsurgical context. VH sex, race, age, and facial expression varied across vignettes. Participants made pain-assessment and treatment decisions on visual analogue scales. Participants subsequently indicated the information they relied on when making decisions. None of the participants reported using VH sex, race, or age in their decision process. Statistical modeling indicated that 28 to 54% of participants (depending on the decision) used VH demographic cues. 76% of participants demonstrated concordance between their reported and actual use of the VH facial expression cue. Vital signs, text-based clinical summary, and VH movement were also reported as influential factors. These data suggest that biases may be prominent in practitioner decision-making about pain, but that providers have minimal awareness of and/or a lack of willingness to acknowledge this bias.PerspectiveThe current study highlights the complexity of provider decision-making about pain management. The VH technology could be used in future research and education applications aimed at improving the care of all persons in pain.