Effect of single‐dose DPP‐4 inhibitor sitagliptin on β‐cell function and incretin hormone secretion after meal ingestion in healthy volunteers and drug‐naïve,well‐controlled type 2 diabetes subjects

To explore the effects of a single dose of the DPP‐4 inhibitor sitagliptin on glucose‐standardized insulin secretion and β‐cell glucose sensitivity after meal ingestion, 12 healthy and 12 drug‐naïve, well‐controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) subjects (mean HbA1c 43 mmol/mol, 6.2%) received sitagliptin (100 mg) or placebo before a meal (525 kcal). β‐cell function was measured as the insulin secretory rate at a standardized glucose concentration and the β‐cell glucose sensitivity (the slope between glucose and insulin secretory rate). Incretin levels were also monitored. Sitagliptin increased standardized insulin secretion, in both healthy and T2D subjects, compared to placebo, but without increasing β‐cell glucose sensitivity. Sitagliptin also increased active glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) and reduced total (reflecting the secretion) GIP, but not total GLP‐1 levels. We conclude that a single dose of DPP‐4 inhibition induces dissociated effects on different aspects of β‐cell function and incretin hormones after meal ingestion in both healthy and well‐controlled T2D subjects.     

Effects of glucose and meal ingestion on incretin secretion in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance

Aims/Introduction: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are the major incretins; their secretion after various nutrient loads are well‐evaluated in Caucasians. However, little is known of the relationship between incretin secretion and differing nutritional loading in Japanese subjects. In the present study, we evaluated GIP and GLP‐1 secretion in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) after glucose loading (75 g glucose and 17 g glucose) and meal ingestion. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 Japanese NGT subjects participated in 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 17 g OGTT and meal tolerance test (MTT). Plasma glucose (PG), serum insulin (IRI), serum C‐peptide (CPR), plasma total GIP, and plasma total GLP‐1 levels during OGTT and MTT were determined. Results: Area under the curve (AUC)‐GIP was increased in proportion to the amount of glucose, and was highest in MTT, showing that GIP secretion is also stimulated by nutrients other than glucose, such as lipid. In contrast, although the larger glucose load tended to induce a larger GLP‐1 release, AUC‐GLP‐1 was not significantly different among the three loading tests (75 g OGTT, 17 g OGTT, MTT) irrespective of the kind or amount of nutrition load. Conclusions: Our results suggest that nutritional composition might have a greater effect on GIP secretion than that on GLP‐1 secretion in Japanese NGT subjects . (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2011.00143.x, 2012)     

Diabetes and obesity treatment based on dual incretin receptor activation: ‘twincretins’

The gut incretin hormones glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are secreted after meal ingestion and work in concert to promote postprandial insulin secretion and regulate glucagon secretion. GLP‐1 also slows gastric emptying and suppresses appetite, whereas GIP seems to affect lipid metabolism. The introduction of selective GLP‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R) agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity has increased the scientific and clinical interest in incretins. Combining the body weight‐lowering and glucose‐lowering effects of GLP‐1 with a more potent improvement of β cell function through additional GIP action could potentially offer a more effective treatment of diabetes and obesity, with fewer adverse effects than selective GLP‐1R agonists; therefore, new drugs designed to co‐activate both the GIP receptor (GIPR) and the GLP‐1R simultaneously are under development. In the present review, we address advances in the field of GIPR and GLP‐1R co‐agonism and review in vitro studies, animal studies and human trials involving co‐administration of the two incretins, as well as results from a recently developed GIPR/GLP‐1R co‐agonist, and highlight promising areas and challenges within the field of incretin dual agonists.     

Twelve weeks treatment with the DPP‐4 inhibitor,sitagliptin, prevents degradation of peptide YY and improves glucose and non‐glucose induced insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim: To examine the effects of 12 weeks of treatment with the DPP‐4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, on gastrointestinal hormone responses to a standardized mixed meal and beta cell secretory capacity, measured as glucose and non‐glucose induced insulin secretion during a hyperglycaemic clamp, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Method: A double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study over 12 weeks in which 24 patients with T2DM were randomized to receive either sitagliptin (Januvia) 100 mg qd or placebo as an add‐on therapy to metformin. In week 0, 1 and 12 patients underwent a meal test and a 90‐min 20 mM hyperglycaemic clamp with 5 g of l ‐arginine infusion. Main outcome measure was postprandial total glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) concentration. Additional measures were insulin and C‐peptide, glycaemic control, intact and total peptide YY (PYY) and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and intact glucagon‐like peptide 2 (GLP‐2) and GLP‐1. Results: All patients [sitagliptin n = 12, age: 59.5 (39–64) years, HbA1c: 8.0 (7.3–10.0)%, BMI: 33.2 (29.3–39.4); placebo n = 12, age: 60 (31–72) years, HbA1c: 7.7 (7.1–9.8)%, BMI: 30.7 (25.7–40.5)] [median (range)] completed the trial. Sitagliptin treatment improved glycaemic control, had no effect on total GLP‐1, GIP or intact GLP‐2, but reduced total PYY and PYY_{3‐ 36}, and increased PYY_{1‐ 36} and intact incretin hormones. Sitagliptin improved first and second phases of beta cell secretion and maximal secretory capacity. All effects were achieved after 1 week. No significant changes occurred in the placebo group. Conclusion: The postprandial responses of total GLP‐1 and GIP and intact GLP‐2 were unaltered. PYY degradation was prevented. Glucose and non‐glucose induced beta cell secretion was improved. There was no difference in responses to sitagliptin between 1 and 12 weeks of treatment.     

Plasma gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 levels after glucose loading are associated with different factors in Japanese subjects

Aims/Introduction: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are major incretins that potentiate insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells. The factors responsible for incretin secretion have been reported in Caucasian subjects, but have not been thoroughly evaluated in Japanese subjects. We evaluated the factors associated with incretin secretion during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Materials and Methods: We measured plasma GIP and GLP‐1 levels during OGTT in 17 Japanese NGT subjects and evaluated the factors associated with GIP and GLP‐1 secretion using simple and multiple regression analyses. Results: GIP secretion (AUC‐GIP) was positively associated with body mass index (P < 0.05), and area under the curve (AUC) of C‐peptide (P < 0.05) and glucagon (P < 0.01), whereas GLP‐1 secretion (AUC‐GLP‐1) was negatively associated with AUC of plasma glucose (P < 0.05). The insulinogenic index was most strongly associated with GIP secretion (P < 0.05); homeostasis model assessment β‐cell was the most the strongly associated factor in GLP‐1 secretion (P < 0.05) among the four indices of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. Conclusions: Several distinct factors might be associated with GIP and GLP‐1 secretion during OGTT in Japanese subjects. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00078.x, 2011)     

Incretin concept revised: The origin of the insulinotropic function of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 – the gut,the islets or both?

Incretins comprise a pair of gut hormones, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1), which are secreted in response to food ingestion and enhance glucose‐dependent insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells. Immediately after secretion, GLP‐1 is degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 more rapidly than GIP, and circulating levels of biologically intact GLP‐1 are substantially lower than those of biologically intact GIP. Therefore, there has been a debate on how the gut‐derived GLP‐1 exerts insulinotropic actions. Recent publications have revealed two novel mechanisms by which GLP‐1 exerts insulinotropic actions: (i) the gut‐derived GLP‐1 activates receptors expressed in nodose ganglions, thereby potentiating glucose‐dependent insulin secretion through the vagus nerves; and (ii) the pancreatic α‐cell‐derived GLP‐1 activates receptors expressed in β‐cells in a paracrine manner. While the relative contributions of the two mechanisms under normal and pathological conditions remain unknown and mechanisms regulating GLP‐1 secretion from α‐cells need to be investigated, the available data strongly indicate that the effects of GLP‐1 on insulin secretion are far more complex than previously believed, and the classical incretin concept regarding GLP‐1 should be revised.     

Weight loss and incretin responsiveness improve glucose control independently after gastric bypass surgery

Background: The aim of the present study was to determine the mechanisms underlying Type 2 diabetes remission after gastric bypass (GBP) surgery by characterizing the short‐ and long‐term changes in hormonal determinants of blood glucose. Methods: Eleven morbidly obese women with diabetes were studied before and 1, 6, and 12 months after GBP; eight non‐diabetic morbidly obese women were used as controls. The incretin effect was measured as the difference in insulin levels in response to oral glucose and to an isoglycemic intravenous challenge. Outcome measures were glucose, insulin, C‐peptide, proinsulin, amylin, glucagon, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) levels and the incretin effect on insulin secretion. Results: The decrease in fasting glucose (r = 0.724) and insulin (r = 0.576) was associated with weight loss up to 12 months after GBP. In contrast, the blunted incretin effect (calculated at 22%) that improved at 1 month remained unchanged with further weight loss at 6 (52%) and 12 (52%) months. The blunted incretin (GLP‐1 and GIP) levels, early phase insulin secretion, and other parameters of β‐cell function (amylin, proinsulin/insulin) followed the same pattern, with rapid improvement at 1 month that remained unchanged at 1 year. Conclusions: The data suggest that weight loss and incretins may contribute independently to improved glucose levels in the first year after GBP surgery.     

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon‐like peptide‐1: Incretin actions beyond the pancreas

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are the two primary incretin hormones secreted from the intestine on ingestion of various nutrients to stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells glucose‐dependently. GIP and GLP‐1 undergo degradation by dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4), and rapidly lose their biological activities. The actions of GIP and GLP‐1 are mediated by their specific receptors, the GIP receptor (GIPR) and the GLP‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R), which are expressed in pancreatic β‐cells, as well as in various tissues and organs. A series of investigations using mice lacking GIPR and/or GLP‐1R, as well as mice lacking DPP‐4, showed involvement of GIP and GLP‐1 in divergent biological activities, some of which could have implications for preventing diabetes‐related microvascular complications (e.g., retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy) and macrovascular complications (e.g., coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease and cerebrovascular disease), as well as diabetes‐related comorbidity (e.g., obesity, non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, bone fracture and cognitive dysfunction). Furthermore, recent studies using incretin‐based drugs, such as GLP‐1 receptor agonists, which stably activate GLP‐1R signaling, and DPP‐4 inhibitors, which enhance both GLP‐1R and GIPR signaling, showed that GLP‐1 and GIP exert effects possibly linked to prevention or treatment of diabetes‐related complications and comorbidities independently of hyperglycemia. We review recent findings on the extrapancreatic effects of GIP and GLP‐1 on the heart, brain, kidney, eye and nerves, as well as in the liver, fat and several organs from the perspective of diabetes‐related complications and comorbidities.     

Incretin secretion in relation to meal size and body weight in healthy subjects and people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are incretin hormones secreted in response to meal ingestion, thereby enhancing postprandial insulin secretion. Therefore, an attenuated incretin response could contribute to the impaired insulin responses in patients with diabetes mellitus. The aim of the present investigation was to investigate incretin secretion, in obesity and type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and its dependence on the magnitude of the meal stimulus. Plasma concentrations of incretin hormones (total, reflecting secretion and intact, reflecting potential action) were measured during two meal tests (260 kcal and 520 kcal) in eight type 1 diabetic patients, eight lean healthy subjects, eight obese type 2 diabetic patients, and eight obese healthy subjects. Both in diabetic patients and in healthy subjects, significant increases in GLP-1 and GIP concentrations were seen after ingestion of both meals. The incretin responses were significantly higher in all groups after the large meal, compared with the small meal, with correspondingly higher C-peptide responses. Both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients had normal GIP responses, compared with healthy subjects, whereas decreased GLP-1 responses were seen in type 2 diabetic patients, compared with matched obese healthy subjects. Incremental GLP-1 responses were normal in type 1 diabetic patients. Increased fasting concentrations of GIP and an early enhanced postprandial GIP response were seen in obese, compared with lean healthy subjects, whereas GLP-1 responses were the same in the two groups. beta-cell sensitivity to glucose, evaluated as the slope of insulin secretion rates vs. plasma glucose concentration, tended to increase in both type 2 diabetic patients (29%, P = 0.19) and obese healthy subjects (22% P = 0.04) during the large meal, compared with the small meal, perhaps reflecting the increased incretin response. We conclude: 1) that a decreased GLP-1 secretion may contribute to impaired insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes mellitus, whereas GIP and GLP-1 secretion is normal in type 1 diabetic patients; and 2) that it is possible to modulate the beta-cell sensitivity to glucose in obese healthy subjects, and possibly also in type 2 diabetic patients, by giving them a large meal, compared with a small meal.     

RD Lawrence Lecture 2017 Incretins: the intelligent hormones in diabetes

The incretin hormones glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) have attracted considerable scientific and clinical interest due largely to their insulin‐releasing and glucose‐lowering properties. Indeed, GLP‐1‐based therapies are now key treatment options for many people with diabetes worldwide. In contrast, GIP‐based agents have yet to reach the clinic based primarily on the impaired insulinotropic action of GIP observed in people with diabetes. Nevertheless, GIP is a key physiological regulator of insulin secretion and stable forms of GIP show much promise in rodent models to alleviate diabetes–obesity. Recent studies suggest that GIP may have an important role to play in a combination therapeutic approach or bioengineered with other gut peptides. Moreover, recent experimental studies indicate that incretins also exert pleiotropic effects in regions of the brain associated with learning and memory, thereby supporting preclinical data demonstrating that incretin‐based drugs improve cognitive function. This review article, based on the RD Lawrence Lecture presented at Diabetes UK Annual Professional Conference (2017), provides a brief overview of incretins with a major focus on GIP, the development of designer GIP analogues, and how these molecules can improve cognition. Thus, incretins can be considered as ‘the intelligent hormones’ and may hold the key to successfully treating the alarming rise in neurodegenerative disorders.     

Response of truncated glucagon-like peptide-1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide to glucose ingestion in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and truncated glucagon like peptide-1 (tGLP-1) are potent gastrointestinal insulinotropic factors (incretin), mostly released after a meal or ingestion of glucose in man and animals. To investigate whether sulfonylurea (SU) affects the secretion of incretin, the modulation of plasma GIP and tGLP-1 levels following glucose ingestion in non-insulin-dependent diabetic type 2 patients with or without SU therapy was studied. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was carried out on 9 healthy subjects (controls) and 18 patients with non-obese type 2, 9 of whom were treated by diet alone (NIDDM-diet) and the other 9 with SU (glibenclamide 2.5 mg or gliclazide 40 mg) once a day (NIDDM-SU). Plasma GIP was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) with R65 antibody, and GLP-1 was measured by RIA with N-terminal-directed antiserum R1043 (GLP-1NT) and C-terminal-directed antiserum R2337 (GLP-1CT). Following OGTT, plasma glucose, GIP, GLP-1NT, and GLP-1CT in type 2 patients increased more markedly than in controls, despite the lower response of insulin. However, there were no significant differences in plasma levels of these peptides between the NIDDM-diet and NIDDM-SU groups. Therefore, it is unlikely that SU is involved in the high response of GIP and GLP-1s to OGTT in type 2 patients.     

Incretin hormone secretion in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: roles of obesity, insulin sensitivity, and treatment with metformin

In normal subjects, the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are responsible for 70% of the insulin response during a meal; but in diabetic subjects and other insulin-resistant conditions, the incretin effect is impaired. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with insulin resistance, and the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind PCOS resemble those of type 2 diabetes mellitus; therefore, women with PCOS may have alterations in the incretin hormone response. Metformin is widely used in the treatment of both type 2 diabetes mellitus and PCOS. Metformin may exert some of its effect on glucose metabolism by increasing GLP-1 biosynthesis and secretion and thereby increasing the incretin effect. The objective of the study was to measure incretin hormone secretion in women with PCOS and to evaluate the effect of metformin treatment. Cross-sectional comparison of 40 women with PCOS (19 lean and 21 obese) and 26 healthy control women (9 lean and 17 obese) and longitudinal evaluation of the effects of 8 months of metformin 1000 mg twice daily in women with PCOS were performed. Plasma concentrations of GIP and GLP-1 were determined frequently during a 75-g glucose tolerance test, and insulin sensitivity was evaluated by the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. The incretin hormone response did not differ between subjects with and without PCOS. Subgroup analysis showed lower GIP (area under the curve [AUC]) levels in obese women with PCOS compared with obese control women (P < .05) and compared with lean women with PCOS (P < .05). Metformin increased GIP (AUC) and GLP-1 (AUC) in lean women with PCOS (P < .05), and a similar trend was seen in the obese women (P = .07). The GIP secretion is attenuated in obese women with PCOS, whereas treatment with metformin increases the levels of both GIP and GLP-1 in women with PCOS.     

Effects of meal size and composition on incretin, α-cell, and β-cell responses

The incretins glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) regulate postprandial insulin release from the β-cells. We investigated the effects of 3 standardized meals with different caloric and nutritional content in terms of postprandial glucose, insulin, glucagon, and incretin responses. In a randomized crossover study, 18 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 6 healthy volunteers underwent three 4-hour meal tolerance tests (small carbohydrate [CH]-rich meal, large CH-rich meal, and fat-rich meal). Non-model-based and model-based estimates of β-cell function and incremental areas under the curve of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, GLP-1, and GIP were calculated. Mixed models and Friedman tests were used to test for differences in meal responses. The large CH-rich meal and fat-rich meal resulted in a slightly larger insulin response as compared with the small CH-rich meal and led to a slightly shorter period of hyperglycemia, but only in healthy subjects. Model-based insulin secretion estimates did not show pronounced differences between meals. Both in healthy individuals and in those with diabetes, more CH resulted in higher GLP-1 release. In contrast with the other meals, GIP release was still rising 2 hours after the fat-rich meal. The initial glucagon response was stimulated by the large CH-rich meal, whereas the fat-rich meal induced a late glucagon response. Fat preferentially stimulates GIP secretion, whereas CH stimulates GLP-1 secretion. Differences in meal size and composition led to differences in insulin and incretin responses but not to differences in postprandial glucose levels of the well-controlled patients with diabetes.     

Physiopathology of postprandial hyperglycemia

Several factors are determinant for postprandial blood glucose. Knowing and analysing these factors will help to optimize diabetes management. First, meal introduces the concept of food glycemic index. Blood glucose peak following a meal is modulated by gut hormones incretin effect, essentially GIP and GLP1. At the hepatic level, 30% of absorbed glucose is extracted by the liver which reduces its endogenous production in parallel. A reduction in hepatic glucose production blockade--through an excess in glucagon or free fatty acids in portal flow--will result in postprandial hyperglycemia. Finally, insulin secretion pattern is less influent than the hepatic insulin resistant state itself in determining this hyperglycemia.     

Incretin dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: Clinical impact and future perspectives

The incretin effect refers to the augmentation of insulin secretion after oral administration of glucose compared with intravenous glucose administration at matched glucose levels. The incretin effect is largely due to the release and action on beta-cells of the gut hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). This system has in recent years had considerable interest due to the success of incretin therapy as a glucose-lowering strategy in type 2 diabetes. In non-diabetic subjects, the incretin effect is responsible for 50–70% of insulin release during oral glucose administration. In type 2 diabetes patients, the incretin effect is impaired and contributes to only 20–35% of the insulin response to oral glucose. The reason for the defective incretin effect in type 2 diabetes has been the subject of many studies. Although the reports in the literature are mixed, most studies of GIP and GLP-1 secretory responses to oral glucose or a mixed meal have shown fairly normal results in type 2 diabetes. In contrast, the insulinotropic effects of both GIP and GLP-1 are impaired in type 2 diabetes with greater suppression of insulin secretion augmentation with GIP than with GLP-1. The suggested causes of these defects are a defective beta-cell receptor expression or post-receptor defects secondary to the diabetes milieu, defective beta-cell function in general resulting in defective incretin effect and genetic factors initiating incretin hormone resistance. Identifying the mechanisms in greater detail would be important for understanding the strengths, weaknesses and efficacy of incretin therapy in individual patients to more specifically target this glucose-lowering therapy.     

The incretin system ABCs in obesity and diabetes – novel therapeutic strategies for weight loss and beyond

Incretins are gastrointestinal‐derived hormones released in response to a meal playing a key role in the regulation of postprandial secretion of insulin (incretin effect) and glucagon by the pancreas. Both incretins, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1), have several other actions by peripheral and central mechanisms. GLP‐1 regulates body weight by inhibiting appetite and delaying gastric, emptying actions that are dependent on central nervous system GLP‐1 receptor activation. Several other hormones and gut peptides, including leptin and ghrelin, interact with GLP‐1 to modulate appetite. GLP‐1 is rapidly degraded by the multifunctional enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4). DPP‐4 is involved in adipose tissue inflammation, which is associated with insulin resistance and diabetes progression, being a common pathophysiological mechanism in obesity‐related complications. Furthermore, the incretin system appears to provide the basis for understanding the high weight loss efficacy of bariatric surgery, a widely used treatment for obesity, often in association with diabetes. The present review brings together new insights into obesity pathogenesis, integrating GLP‐1 and DPP‐4 in the complex interplay between obesity and inflammation, namely, in diabetic patients. This in turn will provide the basis for novel incretin‐based therapeutic strategies for obesity and diabetes with promising benefits in addition to weight loss. © 2016 World Obesity     

Twincretin as a potential therapeutic for the management of type 2 diabetes with obesity

Unimolecular peptide‐based dual agonists against glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R) and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) have been gaining much attention recently as novel antidiabetic agents that can potentially control glycemia and bodyweight. Although GLP‐1 and GIP both enhance insulin secretion and subsequently ameliorate postprandial glucose excursion, most research has focused on GLP‐1R as a therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes. This is partly because the effects of GIPR activation on glycemia and bodyweight have been controversial. GIPR‐deficient mice showed impaired glucose tolerance with reduced β‐cell function and resistance to high‐fat diet‐induced obesity, whereas GIPR agonists improved glycemia and prevented high‐fat diet‐induced obesity in mice. Conflicting results in mice might be explained by pharmacological levels of GIP signal in the central nervous systems decreasing food intake and overcoming the obesogenic effects of GIP at physiological levels in adipose tissues. Thus, GIPR activation at pharmacological levels might result in bodyweight reduction. Indeed, bodyweight reduction by GIPR/GLP‐1R dual agonists was greater than GLP‐1R single agonists in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Thus, GLP‐1R/GIPR dual agonists can add additional therapeutic efficacy to tailored diabetes care, especially among obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, caution should be exercised as to whether or not these drugs are appropriate for the management of Asian type 2 diabetes patients, which are primarily characterized by non‐obesity and impaired β‐cell function, as well as in that of elderly adults with type 2 diabetes, who tend to develop sarcopenia and frailty as a result of poor energy intake.     

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide secretion is induced by inflammatory stimuli in an interleukin‐1‐dependent manner in mice

Recently, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) levels have been found to be increased in response to inflammatory stimuli, leading to insulin secretion and prevention of hyperglycaemia during endotoxemia in mice. In the present study, we assess the relevance of the other incretin hormone, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), as a regulator of glucose metabolism under inflammatory conditions. We found that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) increased GIP secretion in a time‐ and dose‐dependent manner in C57BL/6J mice. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, mice were injected with inflammatory cytokines known to be released by LPS. Circulating GIP levels significantly increased in response to interleukin (IL)‐1β but not IL‐6 or tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α administration. Using respective knockout mice we found that LPS‐mediated GIP secretion was selectively dependent on IL‐1 signalling. To evaluate the functional relevance of inflammatory GIP secretion we pretreated mice with the GIP‐receptor antagonist (Pro3)GIP. This blunted LPS‐induced TNF‐α and IL‐6 secretion but did not affect LPS‐induced insulin secretion or blood glucose‐lowering. In conclusion, GIP provides a novel link between the immune system and the gut, with proinflammatory‐immune modulatory function but minor glucose regulatory relevance in the context of acute endotoxemia.     

DPP‐4 inhibition and islet function

During recent years, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibition has been included in the clinical management of type 2 diabetes, both as monotherapy and as add‐on to several other therapies. DPP‐4 inhibition prevents the inactivation of the incretin hormones, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1). This results in stimulation of insulin secretion and inhibition of glucagon secretion, and there is also a potential β‐cell preservation effect, as judged from rodent studies; that is, it might target the key islet dysfunction in the disease. In type 2 diabetes. This reduces 24‐h glucose levels and reduces HbA_1c by ≈ 0.8–1.1% from baseline levels of 7.7–8.5%. DPP‐4 inhibition is safe, with a very low risk for adverse events including hypoglycemia, and it prevents weight gain. The present review summarizes the studies on the influence of DPP‐4 inhibition on islet function. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2011.00184.x, 2012)