Reproducibility of viscoelastic property and intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the Ocular Response Analyzer

Purpose: To analyse the reproducibility of corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann‐correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal‐compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) obtained with the ocular response analyzer (ORA). Methods: This is a prospective study, nonmasked, of eight successive examinations with the ORA device in 60 normal eyes. Using 30 eyes (one eye per subject), the reproducibility was assessed by comparing the first series of four examinations to the second four and by calculating the within‐subject coefficient of variation. The correlation and difference with the fellow eye were analysed, respectively. Results: The mean values were 10.7 ± 1.8 mmHg, CRF; 10.6 ± 1.6 mmHg, CH; 15.9 ± 3.9 mmHg, IOPg and 16.2 ± 3.7 mmHg, IOPcc. The reproducibility was significantly different for CRF (5.2 ± 5.9%), CH (7.3 ± 8.6%), IOPg (7.7 ± 6.7%) and IOPcc (10.1 ± 8.0%); p < 0.001. Considering the reproducibility, CRF correlated with CH (rs = 0.55; p < 0.001) and showed to be independent of IOPg and IOPcc. The score spread was best for CRF (2.6 ± 1.5 mmHg; 24.0%) compared to IOPg (4.3 ± 1.5 mmHg; 28.1%) and CH (3.1 ± 1.7 mmHg; 29.9%) and worst for IOPcc (5.5 ± 2.5 mmHg; 34.4%). The lowest difference with the fellow eye was observed for CRF (5.0%; p = 0.09). The correlation with the fellow eye was high, especially for IOPcc and CRF (rs > 0.9; p < 0.001) followed by IOPg and CH (rs > 0.8; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ORA device provides reproducible information on viscoelastic properties of the cornea in normal eyes notably CRF and CH. IOPcc was less reproducible. Four measurements per eye were necessary to reach a 10% precision and six for 5%.     

Are There Any Changes in Corneal Biomechanics and Central Corneal Thickness in Fuchs’ Uveitis?

Purpose: To compare corneal biomechanics, intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) of 38 patients with unilateral Fuchs’ uveitis (FU) with 42 healthy controls.

Methods: Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated and corneal-compensated IOP (IOPg and IOPcc, respectively) and CCT were measured.

Results: The mean CH, CRF, and IOPg of the involved FU eyes were significantly lower (9.5?±?1.6, 9.0?±?1.9 and 13.1?±?4.3?mmHg) than contralateral eyes (10.1?±?1.7, 9.9?±?1.7 and 14.6?±?3.4?mmHg), and controls (10.5?±?1.5, 10.3?±?1.5 and 14.8?±?2.5?mmHg), respectively. There was no significant difference for mean IOPcc between involved FU or contralateral eyes and controls (14.8?±?4.1, 15.5?±?3.4 and 15.0?±?2.7?mmHg). The CCT values correlated with CH and CRF in the involved and contralateral eyes.

Conclusions: Involved FU eyes had lower CH, CRF, and IOPg than contralateral eyes and controls, with no difference regarding IOPcc.     

Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the hysteresis and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) eyes measured by the ocular response analyser (ORA). Methods: This is a prospective, cross‐sectional and comparative clinical trial. The setting was a teaching hospital in Birmingham, England. Patients: 216 eyes with POAG, 68 eyes with NTG and 199 eyes with OHT. Observational procedures: Goldmann applanation tonometry and intraocular pressure (IOP), hysteresis and CRF measured by ORA and central corneal thickness (CCT) by ultrasonic pachymetery. The main outcome measures were IOP, CCT, hysteresis and CRF. Results: The hysteresis in NTG, POAG and OHT eyes was 9.0 ± 1.9, 9.9 ± 2.1 and 10.2 ± 2.0 mmHg; CRF was 9.1 ± 2.2, 10.6 ± 2.0 and 12.0 ± 2.0 mmHg; IOP by Goldmann applanation tonometry and ORA was 14.7 ± 2.8 and 15.3 ± 4.2 mmHg, 16.7 ± 4.0 and 16.9 ± 4.6 mmHg and 20.5 ± 4.1 and 20.0 ± 4.5 mmHg; CCT was 526.5 ± 42.2, 537.0 ± 36.0 and 563.4 ± 35.9 µm, respectively. The difference for CRF, IOP and CCT for NTG, POAG and OHT eyes was statistically significant. Conclusion: Hysteresis and CRF were highest in OHT eyes. These factors may prove to be useful measurements of ocular rigidity and may help to understand role of the corneal rigidity in monitoring the progress of conditions such as NTG, POAG and OHT.     

近视人群中角膜生物力学特性的分布

目的：分析伊朗近视眼及散光人群中角膜生物力学参数的分布特征。

方法：对接受激光矫正手术的近视眼及散光患者180眼进行前后节、显然验光等效球镜度、Orbscan II和Zywave全面的术前检查。用眼反应分析仪测量角膜滞后量,角膜阻力因子,模拟Goldmann眼压值及角膜补偿后眼压值。分析所有角膜生物力学的分布特性及其与显然验光等效球镜度、性别和年龄的相关性。数据采用SPSS 17软件进行统计学分析,以P<0.05为有显著性差异。

结果：平均年龄为28.20±6.78岁。平均显然验光等效球镜为-4.21±1.19D。平均角膜滞后量,角膜阻力因子,模拟Goldmann眼压值和角膜补偿后眼压值分别为10.00±1.28mmHg,10.17±1.45mmHg,15.71±2.67mmHg和 16.68±2.41mmHg。近视人群中,28.4%角膜滞后量约为10mmHg,71%从9mmHg增长到11mmHg。25.9%的近视人群的角膜阻力因子为10mmHg,48.7%为9mmHg增长到11mmHg。显然验光等效球镜与角膜滞后量(Rs=0.001,P=0.71)和显然验光等效球镜与角膜阻力因子(Rs=0.01,P=0.18)之间正相关性不明显。

结论：研究显示了伊朗近视眼人群中角膜生物力学的分布特征(角膜滞后量,角膜阻力因子,模拟Goldmann眼压值及角膜补偿后眼压值),并证实了角膜生物力学特性参数和显然验光等效球镜,年龄及性别之间没有统计学相关性。     

Ocular response analyser measurements and central corneal thickness in ocular rosacea patients

Rosacea is a chronic cutaneous disorder which is known to cause inflammation and increased proteolytic activity on the ocular surface that might lead to corneal biomechanical alterations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties of ocular rosacea patients and compare the measurements with healthy individuals as measured with Reichert ocular response analyser (ORA). Besides full eye examination [best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP-G)], central corneal thickness (CCT), and ORA [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann correlated IOP (IOPg)] measurements of 30 eyes of 15 ocular rosacea patients (study group) and 30 eyes of 15 healthy individuals (control group) were performed. For comparisons paired t test was used. Mean age of study group was 45.26 ± 11.65 (range 25 and 63) and control group was 45.00 ± 8.91 (range 26 and 58) years (p = 0.865). No significant difference in BCVA, CCT, IOP-G, IOPcc was detected among groups. However, IOPg, CH, and CRF in the study group were significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.013, p = 0.013, p = 0.009, respectively). IOPg, CH, and CRF parameters of ocular rosacea patients were significantly lower than normal individuals. These differences and their probable clinical reflections that might effect making decisions in conditions such as glaucoma should be investigated in larger number of patients.     

Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following Femto-LASIK using Goldman applanation tonometry and ocular response analyzer

AIM:To compare intraocular pressure(IOP)measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK)with a femtosecond laser for flap creation using ocular response analyzer(ORA)and Goldmann applanation tonometry,and to identify factors that may influence the preoperative and postoperative IOP.METHODS:A prospective study conducted on myopic patients who underwent LASIK using a femtosecond laser for flap fashioning.Enrolled patients were evaluated preoperatively,6 wk and 3 mo postoperatively for manifest refraction(MR),keratometric(K)readings and central corneal thickness(CCT)using a scheimpflug-based topography.Corneal resistance factor(CRF),corneal hysteresis(CH),Goldmann correlated IOP(IOPg)and corneal compensated IOP(IOPcc)were measured using ORA besides IOP assessment by Goldman applanation tonometry(GAT).RESULTS:There was a statistically significant decrease in measures of IOPg by 3.35±0.83 mm Hg,followed by GAT which decreased by 2.2±0.44 mm Hg,and the least affected by operation was IOPcc which decreased only by 0.87±0.1 mm Hg after 6 wk.After 3 mo follow up there was a statistically significant decrease in IOPcc which decreased only by 0.76±0.4 mm Hg,followed by IOP GAT by 1.6±0.5 mm Hg,and the most affected by operation was IOPg which decreased by 2.3±0.3 mm Hg.Correspondingly,there was a statistically significant decrease in CH and CRF after 6 wk and 3 mo.At 3 mo,the preoperative MR and preoperative GAT were prominent significant predictors of the postoperative GAT changes.The prediction equation was subsumed.CONCLUSION:IOP measurements and corneal biomechanical factors reduce significantly after LASIK with a femtosecond laser for flap creation.The IOPcc values are less influenced by changes in corneal properties than IOPg and GAT,indicating that IOPcc may provide the most reliable measurement of IOP after this procedure.     

眼反应分析仪与非接触眼压计眼压测量的对比观察

目的比较眼反应分析仪(ORA)与非接触眼压计(NCT)测量眼压结果的差异,分析ORA、NCT测量结果与角膜中央厚度(CCT)的关系。方法近视患者57例(114只眼),于准分子激光手术前行ORA测量,得出角膜补偿眼压(IOPcc)和Goldmann相关眼压值(IOPg)两个数值,NCT测眼压3次取平均值。结果 ORA测得IOPcc平均值16.85 mm Hg,IOPpg平均值15.26 mm Hg,NCT眼压计测得平均值15.66 mm Hg;IOPcc>NCT>IOPg。IOPcc、IOPg与NCT所测眼压值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。NCT和IOPg均与CCT呈正相关(r:分别为0.463和0.419,P<0.05);IOPcc与CCT无相关性(r:0.230,P>0.05)。结论 ORA测量屈光不正患者的眼压与NCT测量结果存在一定差异,其中IOPcc不受角膜厚度的影响,在临床运用中准确性较好。     

Der Einfluss von kornealer Hysterese und kornealem Resistenzfaktor auf die Messung des intraokularen Drucks

BACKGROUND: The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) has been discussed extensively in recent years. The problem, however, has not been solved so far. In addition to CCT there are probably further biomechanical properties that play a role in IOP measurement. We wanted to find out whether these properties are related to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), noncontact tonometry (NCT), or CCT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Biomechanical properties of the cornea such as corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) can be measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY, USA). Furthermore, a corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc) is given. We examined 156 normal eyes of 80 patients who did not show corneal pathology nor glaucoma. In each eye GAT, NCT, and ORA data as well as CCT were measured. Data were statistically analyzed with respect to agreement and the influence of CH and CRF on IOP measurement. RESULTS: In our patients the following average values were calculated: GAT 14.8+/-3.0 mmHg, NCT 16.4+/-3.9 mmHg, IOPcc 16.2+/-4.1 mmHg, CH 10.6+/-2.3 mmHg, CRF 10.9+/-2.4 mmHg, and CCT 557+/-36 microm. IOPcc was not related to CCT in normal eyes and the only IOP value related to CH (p<0.01). CRF, however, was related to GAT and NCT values (p<0.01). DISCUSSION: In our group of normal eyes IOPcc, i.e., the value that is adjusted by measurement of viscoelastic properties of the cornea, in contrast to GAT and NCT does not depend on central corneal thickness. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor provide further information about biomechanical properties of the cornea beyond central corneal thickness.     

Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open‐angle glaucoma

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure (IOP) and the role of biomechanical properties in eyes of patients with unilateral primary open‐angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: The biomechanical properties of corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured with the ocular response analyser (ORA). In an experimental setting, three human donor eyes with Schiotz‐tonometry‐controlled IOP were investigated. In addition, a series of patients with unilateral POAG were evaluated. Main outcome measures were CH, CRF, corneal‐compensated IOP (IOPcc), standard automated perimetry parameters mean defect (MD) and pattern standard deviation, central corneal thickness, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and cup‐to‐disc ratio. Results: A highly significant linear correlation between CH and the corneal‐compensated IOP (IOPcc, r = ?0.926; p < 0.001) was found. The correlation between IOP_CC and CRF was not significant (r = 0.335; p = 0.08). In total, 36 eyes of 18 patients with unilateral POAG were examined. Regarding uncorrected CH (mean 7.73 ± 1.46 mmHg glaucomatous eye and 9.28 ± 1.42 mmHg fellow eye), there was a highly significant difference between both eyes. This difference disappears, when CH was corrected for IOP (9.44 ± 3.78 mmHg and 9.97 ± 3.22 mmHg, respectively). Conclusions: Corneal hysteresis but not corneal resistance factor is dependent on IOP. In patients with unilateral POAG, IOP is higher in the affected eye. When CH is corrected for IOP, corneal biomechanical properties do not differ in both eyes of patients with unilateral POAG.     

Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese.

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained from the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) on a group of normal Chinese. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five normal subjects were recruited, with one eye randomly selected for this study. Each eye was measured first with the noncontact tonometer ORA, followed by the GAT and ultrasound pachometry, in a randomized order. Four readings were obtained from the ORA, and three measurements were taken with the GAT. The mean was used for analysis. The ORA provided a Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) and a corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc). Three central corneal thickness (CCT) values were measured using an ultrasound pachometer, and the mean was used for analysis. RESULTS: IOP obtained from the ORA was similar to that from the GAT (IOPg minus GAT: mean difference = 0.33 mm Hg, 95% limits of agreement = 4.55 to -4.44 mm Hg; IOPcc minus GAT: mean difference = 0.24 mm Hg, 95% limits of agreement = 4.83 to -5.07 mm Hg). CCT was positively associated with corneal hysteresis (CH) (r2 = 0.30, p < 0.01), corneal resistance factor (r2 = 0.38, p < 0.01), GAT (r2 = 0.09, p < 0.01) and IOPg (r2 = 0.16, p < 0.01). IOPcc was not associated with CCT (r2 = 0.01, p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Both IOPg and IOPcc have good agreement with GAT on normal subjects. The influence of CCT on IOPcc was insignificant.     

Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics in Patıents with Behçet Disease

Aim: To examine corneal biomechanical properties, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness in uveitic eyes with Behçet disease (BD) and to compare them with healthy controls. Methods: This study included 40 eyes of 34 patients with ocular BD and 20 eyes of 20 healthy controls. Eyes with ocular BD were subdivided into active and inactive groups. Ocular response analyzer (ORA) measurements were performed on the 20 eyes of 16 patients with active BD (group 1), 20 eyes of 18 patients with inactive BD (group 2), and 20 eyes of 20 healthy volunteers who served as the control group (group 3). Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), intraocular pressure (Goldmann correlated [IOPg], and corneal compensated [IOPcc]) and central corneal thickness (CCT) values were recorded. Results: Mean age of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 33.81?±?9.36, 32.38?±?9.08, and 31.05?±?5.85 years, respectively (p?=?0.76). Mean CH, CRF, IOPg, IOPcc, and CCT values in groups 1, 2, and 3 were [8.51?±?1.88, 9.72?±?2.11, 19.87?±?2.92, 16.13?±?3.29, and 592.50?±?39.95], [8.46?±?1.82, 8.45?±?1.98, 15.89?±?2.68, 15.35?±?2.91, and 528.35?±?19.18], and [8.47?±?1.48, 8.43?±?1.58, 15.59?±?2.74, 15.42?±?3.19, and 526.30?±?18.21], respectively [(p₁?=?0.040, 0.904, <0.001, 0.495 and <0.001 for CRF, CH, IOPg, IOPcc and CCT in group 1, respectively), (p₂?=?0.989, 0.904, 0.659, 0.989, and 0.989 for CRF, CH, IOPg, IOPcc and CCT in group 2, respectively), (p₃?=?0.989, 0.904, 0.660, 0.989, and 0.989 for CRF, CH, IOPg, IOPcc and CCT in group 3, respectively)]. Conclusion: CRF, IOPg, and CCT values altered in active BD group when compared with inactive BD and control group (p?相似文献   

手法小切口白内障摘除术后早期角膜生物力学特性的变化

目的:观察年龄相关性白内障患者手法小切口白内障摘除术(manual small incision cataract surgery,MSICS)后1d角膜滞后性(corneal hysteretic,CH)、角膜阻力因数(cornealresistance factor,CRF)、角膜补偿眼压(corneal compensa-ted IOP,IOPcc)、Goldmann相关眼压(goldmann correlatedIOP,IOPg)的变化规律,并探讨MSICS术后早期角膜生物力学特性改变的相关因素。方法:应用Reichert眼反应分析仪(ocular response analy-zer,ORA)测量50例50眼年龄相关性白内障患者术眼MSICS术前及术后1d的CH,CRF,IOPg,IOPcc。用SPSS10.0统计学软件分析各测量值的变化规律以及CH变化量与眼压变化量的相关性。结果:术后1d的CH,CRF较术前下降(P<0.01;P<0.01),IOPcc,IOPg较术前升高(P<0.01;P=0.001),CH降低量与眼压增加量呈正相关性(IOPg,r=0.492,P<0.01;IOPcc,r=0.688,P<0.01)。结论:年龄相关性白内障患者手法小切口白内障摘除术后早期角膜生物力学特性明显改变,术后角膜不同程度的水肿和眼压的升高可能是导致改变的主要原因。     

Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) with age, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature (KM), corneal volume (CV), and refractive error in naïve eyes. Methods: 105 healthy subjects (58 male and 47 female) were included in this study. The ages ranged from 19 to 82 years (mean 43.1?±?15.4 years) and refraction between ?11?D and +6?D (mean ?0.79?±?2.95?D). CH and CRF obtained with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) were correlated with age, refractive error, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT), and with CCT, KM, CV obtained with the Pentacam, and with Corneal-Compensated Intraocular Pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure measurement (IOPg) obtained with ORA. A multivariable mixed effect model was used to evaluate associations among these parameters. Results: CH ranged from 6.9 to 14.6?mmHg (mean 10.26?±?1.49?mmHg); CRF ranged from 5.8 to 17?mmHg (mean 10.38?±?1.64?mmHg). Multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between CH with CCT (p?<?0.001), and KM (p?<?0.001), and between CRF with CCT (p?<?0.001) and GAT (p?<?0.001). Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis that CH and CRF are related to the corneal shape and thickness, and show a decrease of CH with age.     

Internal limiting membrane dragging and peeling: a modified technique for macular holes closure surgery

AIM: To introduce a modified technique of internal limiting membrane (ILM) centripetal dragging and peeling to treat idiopathic macular hole (IMH) and to observe the ILM-retina adhesive forces. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with stage 3 to 4 IMH and followed up at least six months were enrolled. All patients underwent complete par plana vitrectomy, ILM dragging and peeling, fluid and gas exchange, 15% C3F8 tamponade and 2-week prone position. The best corrected visual acuity, macular hole evaluation by optical coherence tomography, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean diameter of IMH was 524±148 μm (range: 201-683 μm), with 21 cases (80.8%) greater than 400 μm. ILM dragging and peeling were successfully performed in all cases. Most of the ILM-retina adhesive forces are severe (42.3%, 11/26), followed by mild (38.5%, 10/26), and moderate (19.2%, 5/26). The mean follow-up duration was 21.2±6.1mo. The IMH was closed in 25 (96.3%) eyes. Visual acuity (logMAR) improved significantly from 1.2±0.6 preoperatively to 0.7±0.5 postoperatively (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Preexisting ILM-retina adhesive force is found in IMH patients. With assistance of this force, this modified technique may help to release the IMH edges and improve the closure rate of large IMH.     

Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of the cornea and their association with intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT) and the central corneal radius of curvature (Rc). Methods: Eighty‐three eyes were divided into two groups. The biomechanical properties of the cornea were measured in 63 normal eyes and in 20 post‐laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes. The IOP, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). The Rc and CCT were measured using the corneal topographer Medmont E‐300 and the Tomey SP‐100 Handy ultrasonic pachymeter. Other parameters measured by the ORA, such as TimeIn and TimeOut, were also studied. Results: A mean corneal hysteresis of 10.8 mmHg and CRF of 10.6 mmHg were recorded for the normal eyes. There was no significant association with central curvature. All parameters measured by the ORA showed a significant correlation with the CCT, except for the corneal‐compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). Both IOPs measured by the ORA had the same values for the mean CH and CRF. For the post‐LASIK eyes, the CH and CRF were lower than in the normal non‐operated eyes. The TimeIn and the TimeOut also presented lower values for the post‐LASIK eyes, suggesting that additional data can be obtained with the ORA measurements. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that there is no correlation between the parameters measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer and central corneal radius of curvature. Some of the biomechanical properties of the cornea studied were found to differ in the normal eyes compared to the post‐LASIK eyes.     

Effect of pathological myopia on biomechanical properties: a study by ocular response analyzer

AIM: To evaluate the ocular response analyzer (ORA) measurements of patients with pathological myopia in comparison with those of emmetropic control subjects, and to investigate the correlation between these ORA measurements and spherical equivalent (SE). METHODS: Measurements of 53 eyes of 53 subjects with pathological myopia (SE>-6.00 D) were compared with those of 60 eyes of 60 emmetropic controls. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), noncontact tonometer intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc) were obtained for each subject. The refractive error value was determined as SE via a cycloplegic refraction test. RESULTS: The mean age was 54.1±18.9y (ranging from 5 to 88) in the pathological myopic group and 56.2±19.0y (ranging from 6 to 89) in the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups concerning age and sex. CH and CRF were significantly lower in the pathological myopic group than in the control group (P<0.001, P=0.005, respectively). IOPcc and IOPg were significantly higher in the pathological myopic group than in the control group (P<0.001, P=0.009, respectively). There were significantly positive correlations between CH and SE (r=0.565, P<0.001) and between CRF and SE (r=0.364, P=0.007). There were significantly negative correlations between IOPcc and SE (r=-0.432, P=0.001) and between IOPg and SE (r=-0.401, P=0.003). CONCLUSION: The present study displayed that pathological myopia affected biomechanical properties measured by ORA. The results of corneal biomechanical properties measured by ORA may need to be appreciated by taking refraction into account. Further, pathological myopia might be related with the increased IOP.     

Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma.

PURPOSE: The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) is a newly introduced tonometer that uniquely measures and then integrates corneal biomechanical data into its intraocular pressure (IOP) estimates in an effort to improve accuracy of IOP assessment. This study was devised to investigate whether ORA-derived IOP and corneal biomechanical variables might be useful in discriminating between subjects with and without primary open-angle glaucoma (GLC). METHODS: All patients seen in the Albuquerque VAMC eye clinic over a 10-week period who demonstrated acceptable ORA signal profiles were retrospectively identified. In subjects classified as normal (NML), ocular hypertension (OH), glaucoma suspect (GS), and GLC, the following variables were compared: age, ethnicity, Goldmann IOP, central corneal thickness (CCT), and ORA-derived data: Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg), corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal hysteresis (CH), and difference between IOPcc and IOPg (DIOP; IOPcc - IOPg). RESULTS: Right eyes in 71 NML, 58 OH, 70 GS, and 99 GLC subjects were studied. Using analysis of variance, higher mean age, higher mean DIOP, and lower mean CH were found in the GLC group compared with OH, GS, and NML groups. In multivariate regression analyses, factors that independently discriminated between groups were: age, IOPcc, and DIOP (GLC vs. NML); age and IOPcc (GLC vs. GS); age and CRF (GLC vs. OH). When DIOP was left out of the models, CH replaced DIOP in the GLC vs. NML analysis with nearly equal statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ORA-generated parameters may be useful for differentiating subjects with and without GLC. Furthermore, the discriminatory power of each ORA variable seems to depend on the diagnostic groups that are being compared. Finally, our findings also suggest that measured IOP may be significantly underestimated in glaucoma patients compared with non-glaucoma patients.     

Hornhautdickenunabhängige Methoden der Messung des Augeninnendrucks

Introduction

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) has been the gold standard for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) for about 50 years. However, it depends on central corneal thickness (CCT) and is, therefore, prone to being incorrect. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) has recently been introduced to measure IOP independently of CCT; however, DCT is costly and difficult. IOP measurement using the ocular response analyzer (ORA) offers noncontact tonometry with declaration of the corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc), which takes corneal hysteresis (CH) into account and is supposed to be independent of CCT.

Patients and methods

Using the ORA instrument, IOPcc was determined in 192 glaucoma eyes and 59 nonglaucoma eyes. Subsequently, measurement by DCT and GAT was performed. IOP measurements were compared and analyzed with respect to CCT and CH.

Results

Average values were as follows: IOPcc, 18.38±6.3 mmHg; GAT, 14.69±4.5 mmHg; DCT, 15.17±3.9 mmHg; CH, 9.96±2.5 mmHg; CCT, 552±57 μm. Neither CCT nor CH differed between the two groups. There was a positive correlation between GAT and CCT that did not exist for IOPcc and DCT values. However, IOPcc and DCT differed significantly in Bland–Altman analysis (p<0.01). Furthermore, these two IOP values differed significantly with respect to CH and the level of IOP.

Conclusion

Because IOPcc is not a primarily measured variable but also takes CH into account, a direct comparison of DCT and IOPcc values is not acceptable, and a simple correction factor may not be valid.     

Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer

Purpose:

To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that has undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Data recorded included ocular response analyzer (ORA) values of normal and post-keratoplasty eyes [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc)], corneal topography, and central corneal thickness (CCT). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the difference in ORA parameter between post-PK eyes and normal eyes. Correlation between parameters was evaluated with Spearman''s rho correlation.

Results:

The ORA study of 100 eyes of 50 normal subjects and 54 post-keratoplasty eyes of 51 patients showed CH of 8.340 ± 1.85 and 9.923 ± 1.558, CRF of 8.846 ± 2.39 and 9.577 ± 1.631 in post-PK eyes and normal eyes, respectively. CH and CRF did not correlate with post-keratoplasty astigmatism (P =0.311 and 0.276, respectively) while a significant correlation was observed with IOPg (P =0.004) and IOPcc (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Biomechanical profiles were significantly decreased in post-keratoplasty eyes with significant correlation with higher IOP as compared with that in normal eyes.     

Evaluation of biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

The purpose of this study is to compare the corneal biomechanical properties in primary hyperparathyroid patients and healthy control subjects. The study consisted of 31 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (study group) and 31 healthy subjects (control group). Corneal biomechanical properties, including corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured with an ocular response analyzer (ORA). IOP was also measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter. The differences in ORA parameters and CCT between study and control group participants were analyzed. The mean CH in study and control groups was 8.7 ± 1.9 mmHg (5.3–13.7 mmHg) and 9.8 ± 1.5 mmHg (7.7–14.3 mmHg), respectively (p = 0.018). The mean CRF was 9.5 ± 1.8 (5.5–13.7) in the study group compared with 9.8 ± 1.5 (6.2–12.8) in the control group. The difference for CRF was not statistically significant (p = 0.41). In study and control group, corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc) values were 18.2 ± 4.2 and 16.9 ± 2.7 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.12). Mean IOP measurement values with GAT were 16.3 ± 3.4 mmHg for study group and 16.5 ± 2.7 mmHg for control group (p = 0.71). The mean differences of IOPcc and IOPGAT in the study group eyes were higher than that of control group eyes (1.9 vs. 0.4 mmHg). CCT was 536.5 ± 25.4 µm (490–593 µm) in study group eyes compared with 534.2 ± 31.4 µm (472–602 µm) in control eyes (p = 0.75). Hyperparathyroidism could be associated with a decrease of CH. The differences between IOPcc and IOPGAT in these patients were higher than normal subjects. Underestimation of IOP readings with GAT may be a consequence of the lower CH in patients with hyperparathyroididsm.