Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

PURPOSE: To revise the staging system for cutaneous melanoma under the auspices of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prognostic factors analysis described in the companion publication (this issue), as well as evidence from the published literature, was used to assemble the tumor-node-metastasis criteria and stage grouping for the melanoma staging system. RESULTS: Major changes include (1) melanoma thickness and ulceration but not level of invasion to be used in the T category (except for T1 melanomas); (2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes rather than their gross dimensions and the delineation of clinically occult (ie, microscopic) versus clinically apparent (ie, macroscopic) nodal metastases to be used in the N category; (3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum lactic dehydrogenase to be used in the M category; (4) an upstaging of all patients with stage I, II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; (5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into stage III disease; and (6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy. CONCLUSION: This revision will become official with publication of the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual in the year 2002.     

Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system.

PURPOSE: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recently proposed major revisions of the tumor-node-metastases (TNM) categories and stage groupings for cutaneous melanoma. Thirteen cancer centers and cancer cooperative groups contributed staging and survival data from a total of 30,450 melanoma patients from their databases in order to validate this staging proposal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 17,600 melanoma patients with complete clinical, pathologic, and follow-up information. Factors predicting melanoma-specific survival rates were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Follow-up survival data for 5 years or longer were available for 73% of the patients. RESULTS: This analysis demonstrated that (1) in the T category, tumor thickness and ulceration were the most powerful predictors of survival, and the level of invasion had a significant impact only within the subgroup of thin (< or = 1 mm) melanomas; (2) in the N category, the following three independent factors were identified: the number of metastatic nodes, whether nodal metastases were clinically occult or clinically apparent, and the presence or absence of primary tumor ulceration; and (3) in the M category, nonvisceral metastases was associated with a better survival compared with visceral metastases. A marked diversity in the natural history of pathologic stage III melanoma was demonstrated by five-fold differences in 5-year survival rates for defined subgroups. This analysis also demonstrated that large and complex data sets could be used effectively to examine prognosis and survival outcome in melanoma patients. CONCLUSION: The results of this evidence-based methodology were incorporated into the AJCC melanoma staging as described in the companion publication.     

An evidence-based staging system for cutaneous melanoma

A completely revised staging system for cutaneous melanoma was implemented in 2003. The changes were validated with a prognostic factors analysis involving 17,600 melanoma patients from prospective databases. This major collaborative study of predicting melanoma outcome was conducted specifically for this project, and the results were used to finalize the criteria for this evidence-based staging system. In fact, this was the largest prognostic factors analysis of prospectively followed melanoma patients ever conducted. Important results that shaped the staging criteria involved both the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) criteria and stage grouping for all four stages of melanoma. Major changes in the staging include: (1) melanoma thickness and ulceration are the dominant predictors of survival in patients with localized melanoma (Stages I and II); deeper level of invasion (ie, IV and V) was independently associated with reduced survival only in patients with thin or T1 melanomas. (2) The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the tumor burden were the most dominant predictors of survival in patients with Stage III melanoma; patients with metastatic nodes detected by palpation had a shorter survival compared with patients whose nodal metastases were first detected by sentinel node excision of clinically occult or "microscopic" metastases. (3) The site of distant metastases (nonvisceral versus lung versus all other visceral metastatic sites) and the presence of elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were the dominant predictors of outcome in patients with Stage IV or distant metastases. (4) An upstaging was implemented for all patients with Stage I, II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated by histopathological criteria. (5) Satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases were merged into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease. (6) A new convention was implemented for defining clinical and pathological staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy.     

A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma

The Melanoma Staging Committee of the AJCC has proposed major revisions of the melanoma TNM and stage grouping criteria. The committee members represent most of the major cooperative groups and cancer centers worldwide with a special interest in melanoma; the committee also collectively has had clinical experience with over 40,000 patients. The new staging system better reflects independent prognostic factors that are used in clinical trials and in reporting the outcomes of various melanoma treatment modalities. Major revisions include 1) melanoma thickness and ulceration, but not level of invasion, to be used in the T classification; 2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes, rather than their gross dimensions, the delineation of microscopic versus macroscopic lymph node metastases, and presence of ulceration of the primary melanoma to be used in the N classification; 3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum LDH, to be used in the M classification; 4) an upstaging of all patients with Stage I,II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; 5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease; and 6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The AJC Melanoma Staging Committee invites comments and suggestions regarding this proposed staging system before a final recommendation is made.     

New TNM melanoma staging system: linking biology and natural history to clinical outcomes

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) implemented major revisions of the melanoma TNM and stage grouping criteria in the recently published 6th edition of the Staging Manual. The new staging system better reflects independent prognostic factors that are used in clinical trials and in reporting the outcomes of various melanoma treatment modalities. Major revisions include: 1) melanoma thickness and ulceration but not level of invasion to be used in the T classification, 2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes rather than their gross dimensions and the delineation of microscopic vs. macroscopic nodal metastases to be used in the N classification, 3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) to be used in the M classification, 4) an upstaging of all patients with Stage I, II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated, 5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease, and 6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathological staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy.     

Update on the melanoma staging system: the importance of sentinel node staging and primary tumor mitotic rate

The 7(th) Edition of the AJCC Staging Manual includes a detailed summary of melanoma staging and prognosis. The revisions are summarized in this article, along with details on two key aspects of melanoma staging: the incorporation of mitotic rate of the primary melanoma and the key role of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in determining accurate staging for clinically occult nodal metastases. Primary tumor mitotic rate was introduced as a major criterion for melanoma staging and prognosis that replaces the Clark's level of invasion, and is now proven to be an important independent adverse predictor of survival. Analysis of the AJCC melanoma staging database demonstrated a significant inverse correlation between primary tumor mitotic rate (histologically defined as mitoses/mm(2) ) and survival. The use of SLNB reliably identifies melanoma patients with nodal micrometastases, enabling clinicians to identify patients with occult nodal metastases that would otherwise take months or years to become clinically palpable The number of nodal metastases was the most significant independent predictor of survival among all patients with stage III disease, including among patients with nodal micrometastases, and continues to be a primary criterion for defining Stage III melanoma. A clinical scoring system model and multivariate predictive tool under the auspices of the AJCC has led to a first-generation web-based predictive tool (www.melanomaprognosis.org).     

Review of the 2001 AJCC staging system for cutaneous malignant melanoma

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for melanoma has recently been revised and published. The previous staging system had not been substantially modified since the late 1980s. In a series of papers, the staging system for melanoma was critically analyzed, and many shortcomings were identified. Many well-established prognostic factors were not used in the staging system. This assessment has led to a substantially modified staging system for cutaneous melanoma in 2001 that is a considerable improvement over past staging systems, albeit more complex. The following modifications are the most important: 1) The primary determinant of tumor (T) staging is tumor thickness as measured in millimeters. The Clark level of invasion is now used only for defining T1 (< or = 1mm) melanomas; 2) The cutpoints for tumor thickness are less than or equal to 1 mm, 1 to 2 mm, 2 to 4 mm, and greater than 4 mm; 3) Ulceration has been added in describing the primary tumor; 4) Local recurrence, satellite disease, and in-transit metastases have similar prognosis and are now all classified together as regional stage III disease; 5) Size of lymph node as prognostic factor has been eliminated and replaced with the number of positive nodes; 6) The presence of an elevated serum lactic dehyrogenase level is used in the metastasis (M) category. This revised staging system more precisely defines prognosis and will improve the stratification of patients in future clinical trials.     

The new staging system for cutaneous melanoma in the era of lymphatic mapping

In 2002, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) revised the staging system for cutaneous melanoma on the basis of a survival analysis of important melanoma prognostic factors. Features of the revised system include new strata for primary tumor thickness, incorporation of primary tumor ulceration as an important staging criterion in both the tumor (T) and node (N) classifications, revision of the N classification to reflect the prognostic significance of regional nodal tumor burden, and new categories for distant metastatic disease. These changes reflect evolving insight into melanoma arising from the results of numerous clinical investigations and database analyses. One of the most important recent changes in melanoma care is the establishment of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy as a highly accurate and minimally morbid technique for pathologic regional nodal staging. In this article, the salient features of the revised melanoma staging system are examined, with specific attention paid to its use in this era of lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy.     

Testing a new staging system for cutaneous melanoma proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recently proposed a new staging system for cutaneous melanoma. We tested its practicability and its prognostic value was compared with the currently used TNM classification. The data of 1976 melanoma patients were used for the testing. 1218 patients (61.6%) could be assigned to the proposed pT classification, 136 patients (90.1%) with lymph node metastases and/or in-transit metastases to the proposed pN classification and all 14 patients with distant metastases to the proposed pM classification. Proposed pathological staging was possible for 971 patients (49%). The number of pT1 patients (399 versus 230) and stage I patients (544 versus 393) was distinctly higher in the proposed classification. In proposed stage II and III groups, subgroups with different prognosis could be identified. The new staging system includes more detailed information on clinical and pathohistological findings. Nevertheless, it is practicable and enables more patients with excellent prognosis to be identified.     

Melanoma of unknown primary origin: A population-based study in the Netherlands

AimFew population-based studies have been published on melanoma of unknown primary origin (MUP). This study’s aim is to describe characteristics and survival of MUP patients in the Netherlands, based on nationwide data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR).MethodsPatient and tumour characteristics of MUP patients were retrieved from the NCR. Subgroups were made according to metastatic site: nodal or distant. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. To obtain a better insight in the composition and prognosis of the MUP group, the survival was compared to that of patients with melanoma of a known primary origin (MKP), tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage III and IV.ResultsOf all 33,181 melanoma patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2009, 2.6% (n = 857) were diagnosed with MUP. MUP patients with nodal metastases had a similar survival as MKP stage III with macroscopic nodal involvement. After stratification according to the number of involved lymph nodes, the survival of patients with nodal metastases with one involved lymph node was not significantly different between MUP and MKP. The survival of MUP patients with two or more involved lymph nodes was slightly worse than that of MKP stage III patients with macroscopic nodal involvement with two or more involved lymph nodes. MUP patients with distant metastases had a similar survival as MKP stage IV. After stratification according to number of metastatic sites and metastatic site category, the survival in MKP stage IV patients with (sub)cutaneous metastases was slightly worse than MUP distant patients with (sub)cutaneous metastases.ConclusionsThe results of this study imply that MUP patients form a heterogeneous group, and that MUP patients with nodal metastases could be classified as stage III melanoma with macroscopic nodal involvement, and MUP patients with distant metastases as stage IV melanoma.     

Clinical and biological aspects of sentinel node biopsy in malignant melanoma — an update

The diagnostic usefulness of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been well established, but its therapeutic value remains unproven. First introduced by Morton and colleagues, the SLNB procedure is now widely available, and markedly enhances our ability to pathologically stage the regional nodes. Although the SLN status is acknowledged as the most powerful indicator of prognosis in melanoma, there is no evidence to-date, of survival advantage for complete lymphadenectomy in SLN-positive patients. Also, there is no effective adjuvant therapy that could benefit these sentinel node-positive patients, as yet. Additionally, new data have emerged indicating a possible increase in local/in-transit recurrence following complete lymphadenectomy in sentinel node-positive patients. To understand fully and to evaluate these observations we need information from randomized controlled trials. Major changes have occurred following the latest revision of melanoma staging system (AJCC, 6th edition). Concerning N category, these include the incorporation of the number of metastatic lymph nodes, the tumour burden of nodal metastases, and the ulceration of the primary tumour. The data obtained from the new staging system will reflect differences in prognosis that were not previously emphasized and which, we hope, will serve as a guide to more accurate analysis of metastatic pathways in cutaneous melanoma as well as a rationale for new forms of treatment.     

Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of pathologic sentinel lymph node (SLN) status with that of other known prognostic factors on recurrence and survival in patients with stage I or II cutaneous melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 612 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy between January 1991 and May 1995 to determine the effects of tumor thickness, ulceration, Clark level, location, sex, and SLN pathologic status on disease-free and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: In the 580 patients in whom lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy were successful, the SLN was positive by conventional histology in 85 patients (15%) but negative in 495 patients (85%). SLN status was the most significant prognostic factor with respect to disease-free and disease-specific survival by univariate and multiple covariate analyses. Although tumor thickness and ulceration influenced survival in SLN-negative patients, they provided no additional prognostic information in SLN-positive patients. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy is highly accurate in staging nodal basins at risk for regional metastases in primary melanoma patients and identifies those who may benefit from earlier lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, pathologic status of the SLN in these patients with clinically negative nodes is the most important prognostic factor for recurrence. The information from SLN biopsy is particularly helpful in establishing stratification criteria for future adjuvant trials.     

The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of brain metastases in the staging of cutaneous melanoma

AimsTo retrospectively evaluate the use of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the initial staging of patients with cutaneous melanoma in our melanoma unit.Materials and methodsThe radiology request forms for brain MRI for melanoma staging for 193 consecutive patients were reviewed. Patient hospital records were also retrospectively reviewed. Patients with no histological confirmation of a cutaneous primary or patients whose scan was to primarily investigate their neurological symptoms were excluded. Records were also searched for incidental symptoms that may have been associated with brain metastases.ResultsOne hundred patients were eligible. No patients were upstaged by MRI. Of a total of 33 patients already graded as stage IV by prior staging, 11 (33%) were found to have brain metastases. No patients graded less than stage IV were found to have brain metastases on MRI. Six out of 12 patients with incidental symptoms had metastases. Five patients graded as stage IV had asymptomatic brain metastases.ConclusionWe recommend brain MRI only for patients with stage IV disease and for other patients with melanoma contemplating further adjuvant therapy where brain metastases would change management.     

Predictive value of FIGO and AJCC staging systems in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma

BackgroundCancer staging systems aim to identify patient cohorts with different outcomes based on clinically relevant prognostic factors. Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is classified using the FIGO staging system developed for epithelial malignancies; other sarcomas use the AJCC staging system. Neither has been validated in ULMS. We critically evaluated both systems to determine if either identified patient groups with distinct outcomes.MethodsWe staged 230 ULMS patients by the FIGO and AJCC systems. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated; statistical pairwise comparisons were performed.ResultsThe number of stages I and III patients varied by staging system. There were few stage II patients by either system. Using the FIGO system, PFS was better in stage I patients versus stage III or IV patients, and OS was better in stage I patients versus stage IV patients. Using the AJCC system, PFS and OS were better in stage I patients (low grade) versus stage II, III or IV patients, and OS was better in stage III patients versus stage IV patients. Prognosis of patients with serosal involvement (FIGO III) was similar to that of patients with metastases (FIGO IV).ConclusionNeither system classifies ULMS patients into four clinically meaningful, non-overlapping stages predictive of PFS and OS. This analysis highlights the relevance of certain factors (low grade, serosal involvement) and rarity of others (FIGO stage II, cervical invasion). Once identified, prognostic factors relevant to this malignancy should be incorporated into a new staging system in an effort to identify appropriate cohorts for different treatments.     

Revisiting determinants of prognosis in cutaneous melanoma

The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma is based on primary tumor thickness and the presence of ulceration, mitoses, lymph node spread, and distant metastases as determinants of prognosis. Although this cutaneous melanoma staging system has evolved over time to more accurately reflect patient prognosis, improvements are still needed, because current understanding of the particular factors (genetic mutation, expression alteration, host response, etc) that are critical for predicting patient outcomes is incomplete. Given the clinical and biologic heterogeneity of primary melanomas, new prognostic tools are needed to more precisely identify patients who are most likely to develop advanced disease. Such tools would affect clinical surveillance strategies and aid in patient selection for adjuvant therapy. The authors reviewed the literature on prognostic molecular and immunologic markers in primary cutaneous melanoma, their associations with clinicopathologic and survival outcomes, and their potential for incorporation into current staging models. Overall, the studies considered in this review did not define prognostic markers that could be readily incorporated into the current staging system. Therefore, efforts should be continued in these and other directions to maximize the likelihood of identifying clinically useful prognostic biomarkers for cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 2015;121:4108–4123. © 2015 American Cancer Society.     

Management of Stage MB Breast Cancer

Systemic treatments with hormones and/or chemotherapy attained outstanding success in producing objective regressions of local and distant metastases of breast cancer. With these demonstrations, similar therapies were employed in the adjuvant setting for stage II patients resulting in improved disease-free and overall survival (1,2). For locally advanced disease, systemic treatments caused substantial shrinkage of unresectable primary tumors (3,4). Because of the poor prognosis of stage III breast cancer, a positive approach to its management has been neglected or at least variable. This has been associated, in part, with the changing of staging systems of breast cancer. Further confusion occurred with clinical trials that incorporated stages IIB and III breast cancer. For clarification in this report, reference will be made to stage IIIB breast cancer (5,6). Stage IIIB breast cancer consists of tumors of any size with direct extension to the chest wall or skin (T4) with axillary node involvement (N1 and N2), but not including internal mammary chain or supraclavicular nodes. Inflammatory carcinoma (T4d) is also included. Distant metastases are not present (5,6). Data for the staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer in 1992 reported the 5-year survival of stage IIIB breast cancer was approximately 48% (6).     

Human chorionic gonadotropin and alphafetoprotein in the staging of nonseminomatous testicular cancer

Thirty patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer and no evidence of metastases outside the retroperitoneum were evaluated for discrepancy between the clinical and pathologic stages and also for frequency of elevations of the serum levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and alphafetoprotein (AFP). When marker-level data were not considered in the staging, the clinical and pathologic stages differed in 47% of the patients; the inclusion of marker data reduced the staging error to 37%. Seven of ten patients with clinical Stage I, pathologic Stage II disease had normal marker levels (false-negative results). However, there were no false-positive results: abnormal marker levels before retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy always signalled persistent tumor unless the level could be accounted for by the metabolic decay rate of marker produced by the primary tumor. Comparison of marker-level data from these patients with data from 48 patients with Stage III disease demonstrated increasing frequency of elevated marker levels with increasing stage (P less than 0.001). Serial determinations of HCG and AFP are helpful in clinical staging and are necessary in clinical management.     

Sentinel lymphadenectomy does not increase the incidence of in-transit metastases in primary melanoma.

PURPOSE: Recent reports by European investigators suggest that sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLND), a mainstay of melanoma diagnosis and treatment planning, increases the risk of in-transit metastasis (ITM) and should be abandoned. This study compared the incidence of ITM after wide local excision (WLE), WLE plus SLND (SLND), or WLE plus elective lymphadenectomy (ELND) for primary melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Review of our prospective database identified 4,412 patients who underwent WLE (n = 2,771), SLND (n = 1,016), or ELND (n = 625) for stage I/II melanoma (1971 through 2002). The incidence of ITM overall and as a first recurrence was examined before and after computerized prognostic matching of treatment groups. Intergroup statistical comparisons used chi(2) analysis and log-rank test. RESULTS: The incidence of ITM increased with Breslow depth, Clark level, and T stage. Although overall incidence of ITM was significantly higher (P = .0008) after ELND (6.56%) versus WLE (3.36%) or SLND (3.64%), the ELND group had higher risk primaries. Treatment groups matched by T stage (1,875 patients; 625 per group) or by age, sex, Breslow depth, and primary location (1,680 patients; 560 per group), showed no significant differences in ITM overall or as a first recurrence. CONCLUSION: There is no relationship between SLND and ITM. Recent reports to the contrary reflect analysis of significantly smaller cohorts not matched for confounding variables such as T stage. The phase III Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial will definitively settle the issue; until then, use of SLND, the most accurate staging procedure for early-stage melanoma, should continue.     

New developments in melanoma: utility of ultrasound imaging (initial staging, follow-up and pre-SLNB)

Melanoma incidence is still increasing, but the mortality rate has remained unchanged. Lymph node metastases are the single most important prognostic factor for stage I/II melanoma patients. Currently, the standard of care with regard to the staging of these patients is the surgical sentinel node procedure. Ultrasound is not routine for the diagnostic work-up of primary melanomas. Some may use ultrasound for the preoperative assessment of the tumor thickness and lymphatic drainage, but this has not found wide application. For the follow-up of melanoma patients, ultrasound has been proven to be superior to physical examination for the detection of lymph node metastases. A meta-analysis has shown that ultrasound is superior to computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT for the detection of lymph node metastases, whereas PET-CT was superior for the detection of distant visceral metastases. Ultrasound of regional lymph nodes has been incorporated into many national guidelines across Europe and in Australia for the follow-up of melanoma patients. A new avenue for ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the pre-sentinel node modality. Like the situation in breast and thyroid cancer, US-FNAC, a minimally invasive procedure, may decrease the need for surgical sentinel node staging. New ultrasound morphology criteria have significantly increased the sensitivity of this technique. Peripheral perfusion is an early sign of metastases (77% sensitivity, 52% positive-predictive value), whereas balloon-shaped lymph node was a late sign of metastases (30% sensitivity, 96% positive-predictive value). Together, these new ultrasound morphology criteria were able to accurately demonstrate metastases in 65% of sentinel node-positive patients. Future perspectives of ultrasound in melanoma include the start of a large multicenter, multicountry validation study - USE-FNAC - by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Melanoma Group. In light of new and promising adjuvant therapies, the need for ultrasound staging might increase rapidly.