A retrospective, comparative study on the frequency of abuse in migraine and chronic daily headache

OBJECTIVE: To assess and contrast the relative frequency of a past history of physical and/or sexual abuse in patients with chronic daily headache (CDH) versus migraine. BACKGROUND: A number of risk factors have been identified as risk factors for chronification of headache disorders. Limited data exist regarding the influence of physical and/or sexual abuse on primary headache disorders. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 183 consecutive new headache patients seen from December 2004 through August 2005 at an outpatient tertiary-care center. Patients were included in the study if they had chronic daily headache (with criteria for medication over-use headache or chronic migraine), or migraine with or without aura. A history of physical and/or sexual abuse was systematically asked of all headache patients at their first visit in the clinic. This information was then transferred to a semi-standardized form and the relative frequency of abuse in both groups contrasted. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients included in the study, 90.1% were female with a mean age of 36.4 +/- 12.0. A total of 59.0% of the patients were diagnosed with CDH and 41.0% were diagnosed with migraine. Overall, 34.8% of all patients, 40.0% of CDH patients, and 27.3% of migraine patients had a history of physical and/or sexual abuse. The relative frequency of a history of physical and/or sexual abuse was higher in the CDH group as compared to the migraine group (P = .048). CONCLUSION: The relative frequency of abuse is higher in CDH sufferers than migraineurs, suggesting that physical and sexual abuse may be risk factors for chronification.     

Botulinum toxin type a for the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache: subgroup analysis of patients not receiving other prophylactic medications: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A; BOTOX, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) for the prophylaxis of headaches in patients with chronic daily headache (CDH) without the confounding factor of concurrent prophylactic medications. BACKGROUND: Several open-label studies and an 11-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study suggest that BoNT-A may be an effective therapy for the prophylaxis of headaches in patients with CDH. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of an 11-month, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of BoNT-A for the treatment of adult patients with 16 or more headache days per 30-day periods conducted at 13 North American study centers. All patients had a history of migraine or probable migraine. This analysis involved data for patients who were not receiving concomitant prophylactic headache medication and who constituted 64% of the full study population. Following a 30-day screening period and a 30-day single-blind, placebo injection, eligible patients were injected with BoNT-A or placebo and assessed every 30 days for 9 months The following efficacy measures were analyzed per 30-day periods: change from baseline in number of headache-free days; change from baseline in headache frequency; proportion of patients with at least 30% or at least 50% decrease from baseline in headache frequency; and change from baseline in mean headache severity. Acute medication use was assessed, and adverse events were recorded at each study visit. RESULTS: Of the 355 patients randomized in the study, 228 (64%) were not taking prophylactic medication and were included in this analysis (117 received BoNT-A, 111 received placebo injections). Mean age was 42.4+/-10.90 years; the mean frequency of headaches per 30 days at baseline was 14.1 for the BoNT-A group and 12.9 for the placebo group (P=.205). After two injection sessions, the maximum change in the mean frequency of headaches per 30 days was -7.8 in the BoNT-A group compared with only -4.5 in the placebo group (P=.032), a statistically significant between-group difference of 3.3 headaches. The between-group difference favoring BoNT-A treatment continued to improve to 4.2 headaches after a third injection session (P=.023). In addition, BoNT-A treatment at least halved the frequency of baseline headaches in over 50% of patients after three injection sessions compared to baseline. Statistically significant differences between BoNT-A and placebo were evident for the change from baseline in headache frequency and headache severity for most time points from day 180 through day 270. Only 5 patients (4 patients receiving BoNT-A treatment; 1 patient receiving placebo) discontinued the study due to adverse events and most treatment-related events were transient and mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: BoNT-A is an effective and well-tolerated prophylactic treatment in migraine patients with CDH who are not using other prophylactic medications.     

Frequent analgesics consumption in migraineurs: comparison between chronic and episodic migraineurs

Abstract To assess the frequent consumption of symptomatic medications in migraineurs, we consecutively recruited 536 migraineurs from a headache clinic. Among them, 194 (36.2%) had chronic migraine and 342 had episodic migraine. When grouped according to duration of headache, the proportion of patients with chronic migraine increased from 25.5% to 50.9% as headache history increased from <1 to >20 years. The percentage of patients with frequent analgesics consumption also increased with the duration of headache, in patients with both chronic migraine (from 25.0% to 85.7%) and episodic migraine (from 20.0% to 59.3%). Nonetheless, patients with chronic migraine had a higher prevalence of frequent consumption of abortive medications than patients with episodic migraine regardless of duration of headache history, and the common odds ratio across strata of headache duration was 2.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.9–4.1). However, we found that a long headache history is an important risk factor for frequent consumption of symptomatic medications in migraineurs in patients with both episodic migraine and chronic migraine.     

Predictors of a negative response to topiramate therapy in patients with chronic migraine

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables predictive of a negative response to prophylactic therapy with topiramate in patients with chronic migraine. BACKGROUND: While certain of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have emerged as promising or definitely effective therapies for migraine prevention, we continue to lack biologic or clinical variables predictive of treatment response to these or other widely used prophylactic therapies. METHODS: A consecutive series of 170 patients with IHS-defined migraine who were experiencing 15 or more days of headache per month were treated with topiramate according to a uniform dosing protocol. Variables examined for their potential value in predicting treatment response included age, gender, prior experience with prophylactic therapy, prior experience with divalproex sodium specifically, headache frequency and, if present, duration of chronic daily headache (CDH). A positive treatment response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in headache days during the second treatment month relative to the patient's pretopiramate baseline. Only patients who completed the treatment phase and achieved the 50 mg BID target dose were analyzed (efficacy analysis). Each variable prospectively selected was evaluated in regards to treatment outcome via a paired t-test, and a multiple regression analysis of all variables subsequently was performed. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients completed at least 60 days of treatment and consequently were available for analysis. In the efficacy analysis, 45 (38.8%) of the 116 responded positively to topiramate. Neither age nor gender influenced treatment response. Those patients with CDH of more than 6 months duration, patients who previously had tried and failed more than three prophylactic agents and patients who previously had failed to respond to divalproex sodium were more likely to be nonresponders, but after multiple regression analysis the only statistically significant predictor of a negative treatment response was CDH of more than 6 months duration (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic migraine who are treated with topiramate may respond positively at a rate approaching that reported from placebo-controlled trials involving topiramate or other AEDs administered to less severely afflicted migraineurs. Our analysis suggests that patients with chronic migraine least likely to respond to topiramate would be those with extensive and negative previous experience with prophylactic therapy, previous failure to respond to divalproex sodium, CDH, and, most notably, CDH of more than 6 months duration.     

How many different headaches do you have?

Patients with migraine attending a specialist clinic often have more than one type of headache. One hundred and two patients attending the City of London Migraine Clinic for the first time were asked: "What type(s) of headache do you think you have?" A separate diagnosis was made by the doctor, who was blinded to the self-diagnosis. On clinic diagnosis, 27 (26.5%) patients were found to have migraine plus an additional non-migraine headache. When compared with the self-diagnosis, 15 (56%) of these had correctly self-diagnosed two types of headache. Many migraineurs can distinguish migraine from non-migraine headaches when they have both.     

Effect of withdrawal of misused medication on sleep disturbances in migraine sufferers with chronic daily headache

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sleep pattern of migraineurs with chronic daily headache and to determine whether and to what degree it is improved by withdrawal of medication, and to reconfirm relief of headache by withdrawal of medications in migraineurs with chronic daily headache due to medication misuse. BACKGROUND: Misuse of ergotamine and analgesics by migraineurs is one of the causes of chronic daily headache. The latter is alleviated or abolished in these patients by abrupt withdrawal of the misused medication. In common with patients with chronic daily headache, migraineurs frequently complain of insomnia, usually verifiable by polysomnography. METHODS: Twenty-six women with migraine, aged 18 to 49 years, with chronic daily headache due to medication misuse, voluntarily discontinued ergotamine and analgesics, and were followed at monthly intervals for 3 months. In 25 subjects, polysomnography was performed before withdrawal of medication and 3 months after withdrawal. All subjects filled out a standard sleep questionnaire on those two occasions and a daily self-assessment questionnaire focused on headaches. RESULTS: After 3 months, a significant decrease in mean headache frequency (P<.001) and intensity (P<.001) was demonstrated. Polysomnography performed 3 months after medication withdrawal showed significant improvement in total sleep time (P<.05), sleep efficiency (P<.05), and number of arousals (P<.001). The score of the sleep questionnaire was also significantly improved (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: In migraineurs with chronic daily headache due to medication misuse, withdrawal of the misused medications alleviates the associated sleep disturbance along with diminution in frequency and intensity of chronic daily headache.     

The impact of intensive patient education on clinical outcome in a clinic-based migraine population

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of patient education to routine medical management improves the clinical status of migraine patients and reduces their utilization of healthcare resources. BACKGROUND: Optimal migraine management typically requires effective patient education. Such education often is difficult to accomplish in the busy clinic setting. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with migraine presenting to an university-based headache clinic were randomized to receive or not receive a standardized course of didactic instruction regarding migraine biogenesis and management. The course consisted of 3 classes taught by lay migraineurs who themselves previously had undergone intensive training. All patients were evaluated initially and at 1, 3, and 6 months by a neurologist blinded as to the results of randomization. Clinical variables examined included headache frequency/severity, migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) scores, patient compliance, presence versus absence of analgesic use/overuse, and headache-related unscheduled visits or phone calls. Comparisons were made between baseline findings and findings at the 6-month follow-up visit, with the change in mean MIDAS score serving as the primary outcome variable. RESULTS: At 6 months the group randomized to receive intensive education exhibited a significantly greater reduction in mean MIDAS score than the group randomized to routine medical management only (24 vs. 14 points; P < .05). Those patients also experienced a reduction in mean headache days per month and a greater reduction in functionally incapacitating headache days per month, exhibited less analgesic overuse and need for abortive therapy, were more compliant with prophylactic therapy prescribed, and made fewer headache-related calls to the clinic or unscheduled visits. CONCLUSION: Intensive education of migraine patients by trained lay instructors may convey significant benefit to those patients and reduce their utilization of healthcare resources.     

Transformed or Evolutive Migraine

SYNOPSIS
630 (39%) of 1600 patients seen in a Headache Clinic over a three year period had chronic daily headaches (CDH). In 78% of these CDH patients, the daily headaches evolved out of a prior history of episodic migraine; these patients we designate as having "transformed" or "evolutive" migraine. The other 12% had migraine headaches which were daily from the start.
Patients with transformed migraine, in contrast to those with daily headaches from the start, have a significantly higher incidence of positive family history of migraine, menstrual aggravation of migraine, identifiable trigger factors, associated G.I. and neurological symptoms, and early morning awakening with headache.
The CDH group in general over-used symptomatic medication and exhibited abnormalities on behavioral scale testing. Withdrawal of daily symptomatic medication, institution of a low tyramine low caffeine diet, initiation of prophylactic anti-migraine therapy, and biofeedback and behavioral therapy, gave worthwhile improvement in 76% of chronic daily headache patients.
Factors which promote "evolution" of migraine from intermittent to chronic daily occurrence are not well-defined but may include medication abuse, medication withdrawal, and psychiatric disturbances.     

Occipital Nerve Blocks: Effect of Symptomatic Medication

Objective.— To explore the effect of symptomatic medication overuse (SMO) and headache type on occipital nerve block (ONB) efficacy.
Methods.— We conducted a chart review of all of the ONBs performed in our clinic over a 2-year period.
Results.— Of 108 ONBs with follow-up data, ONB failed in 22% of injections overall. Of the other 78%, the mean decrease in head pain was 83%, and the benefit lasted a mean of 6.6 weeks. Failure rate without SMO was 16% overall, and with SMO was 44% overall ( P  < .000). In those who did respond, overall magnitude and duration of response did not differ between those with and those without SMO. Without SMO, ONB failure rate was 0% for postconcussive syndrome, 14% for occipital neuralgia, 11% for non-intractable migraine, and 39% for intractable migraine. With SMO, failure rate increased by 24% ( P  = .14) in occipital neuralgia, by 36% ( P  = .08) for all migraine, and by 52% ( P  = .04) for non-intractable migraine.
Conclusions.— SMO tripled the risk of ONB failure, possibly because medication overuse headache does not respond to ONB. SMO increased ONB failure rate more in migraineurs than in those with occipital neuralgia, possibly because migraineurs are particularly susceptible to medication overuse headache. This effect was much more pronounced in non-intractable migraineurs than in intractable migraineurs.     

The International Headache Society (IHS) Headache Classification as applied to a headache clinic population

Four hundred patients attending a headache clinic were classified using the IHS criteria. The majority required more than two, often three or four, diagnoses. Even though migraine was the most common diagnosis, only 1/4 of those with a migraine diagnosis had it as the only diagnosis. Seventy-five percent of migraine patients had coexistent chronic tension-type headache (CTTH), drug-induced headache or both. Ninety-six percent of patients diagnosed as having migraine with aura also suffered from migraine without aura. More than 1/3 of patients (37.7%) attending the clinic suffered from chronic daily headache (CDH) (chronic cluster headache excluded), which is not included as a separate entity in the IHS classification. Pure CTTH formed only a small minority of CDH, whereas 86.6% of CDH had migraine as one of the diagnoses. Drug-induced headache was a prominent second or third diagnosis. The advantages and disadvantages of multiple verses single diagnosis in CDH and the need to recognize the natural history of headache disorders in the classification are discussed.     

The prophylactic treatment of chronic daily headache

Chronic daily headache (CDH), a heterogeneous group of headache disorders occurring on at least 15 days per month, affects up to 4% to 5% of the general population. CDH disorders include transformed (or chronic) migraine, chronic tension-type headache, new daily persistent headache, and hemicrania continua. Patients with CDH have greater disability and lower quality of life than episodic migraine patients and often overuse headache pain medications. To date, only topiramate, gabapentin, tizanidine, fluoxetine, amitriptyline, and botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) have been evaluated as prophylactic treatment of CDH in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, or active comparator-controlled trials. The evidence supporting the use of BoNTA as prophylaxis of CDH is composed of larger and longer trials, as over 1000 patients were evaluated for up to 11 months duration. Compared with placebo BoNTA has significantly reduced the frequency of headache episodes, a recommended efficacy measure for headache trials and has been demonstrated to be safe and very well tolerated with few discontinuations due to adverse events. Side effects are generally transient, mild to moderate, and nonsystemic. The results of clinical trials using traditional oral pharmacotherapy, while supportive of their use as prophylactic treatment of CDH, are limited by several factors, including small numbers of patients, the choice of efficacy measures, and short treatment periods. The use of oral agents was associated with systemic side effects, which may limit their effectiveness as prophylactic treatment of CDH.     

Similarities and differences between chronic migraine and episodic migraine

OBJECTIVE: To quantify and characterize the similarities and the differences between chronic migraine (CM) patients with medication overuse and episodic migraine (EM) patients with only occasional analgesic use. BACKGROUND: Population-level epidemiology, characteristics, mechanisms of chronic daily headache, and medication-overuse headache have been widely studied but patient characteristics have received less attention. Methods.-We compared sociodemographic data, family history, physiological and medical history, health services utilized, drugs taken/prescribed, and outcome of 2 groups of subjects: 150 patients, suffering from CM, complicated by probable medication-overuse headache (CM group), consecutively admitted during 2005 to the inpatients' ward of the Headache Centre of the University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy, to undergo withdrawal from their overused medications; 100 patients suffering from EM, uncomplicated by medication overuse (EM group), consecutively referred to the outpatients' ward of the Headache Centre during November and December 2005. RESULTS: All sociodemographic characteristics were significantly different between the 2 groups. As a whole, the CM group began to suffer from migraine earlier than the EM group. Drug and/or alcohol abuse was significantly higher among first-degree relatives of CM (19%) than of EM (6%) patients. The most frequent comorbid disorders were psychiatric (67%) and gastrointestinal diseases (43%) in the CM group, and allergies in the EM group (31%). Seventy percent of CM patients and 42% of EM patients were taking daily at least another drug, besides those for headache treatment. Most overused medications in the CM group were triptans (43%); the EM group used above all single NSAIDs (56%). At 3-month follow-up, prophylactic treatments reduced, by at least 50%, the frequency of headache in about three-fourths of patients of both the groups; however, headache remained significantly more frequent in the CM than in EM group: only a minority (15%) of CM patients reverted to a headache frequency comparable to that of the EM group. CONCLUSIONS: CM patients present more multiple comorbid disorders, polypharmacy, and social impediments than EM patients. These associated conditions complicate CM clinical management. Even after withdrawal from medication overuse, CM could not be completely reverted by current prophylactic treatments.     

Chronic Daily Headache: Long-Term Prognosis Following Inpatient Treatment With Repetitive IV DHE

We retrospectively studied the long-term (2-year) outcome of 50 consecutive patients admitted to our inpatient headache program because of chronic daily headache (CDH) associated with the overuse of analgesics, ergotamine, or both. They had been detoxified, given repetitive intravenous dihydroergotamine (IV DHE) and prophylactic medications as part of the program, and had become headache-free on this regimen. At the time of admission, 37 of the 50 patients had transformed migraine (TM), 12 had new daily persistent headache (NDPH), and 1 had chronic tension-type headache; 29 of the patients with TM, 7 of those with NDPH, and the single patient with chronic tension-type headache had coexistent migraine. Substances abused, alone or in combination, included: caffeine in 39 patients (av. 441 mg/d), acetaminophen in 32 (av. 2187 mg/d), aspirin in 24 (av. 1807 mg/d), ibuprofen in 9 (av. 1156 mg/d), narcotics in 7 (av. 10.1 mg morphine equivalents/d) and ergotamine in 11 (av. 2.3 mg/d). Twenty patients were using preventive medication at the time of admission. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge. Forty-three patients were analyzed at 3 months. Of these, 44% had an excellent or good result and 28% a fair result; 3 were overusing analgesics. At 24 months, 39 patients were analyzed: 59% had a good or excellent result and 28% a fair result; 5 were overusing analgesics, 4 of whom were doing poorly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Migraine

Objective.— To evaluate the relative frequency of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in episodic migraine (EM) and chronic daily headache (CDH) sufferers and the impact on headache-related disability.
Background.— Approximately 8% of the population is estimated to have PTSD. Recent studies suggest a higher frequency of PTSD in headache disorders. The association of PTSD and headache-related disability has not been examined.
Methods.— A prospective study was conducted at 6 headache centers. PTSD was assessed using the life events checklist and PTSD checklist, civilian version (PCL-C). We compared data from EM to CDH, and migraine with PTSD to migraine without PTSD. The PHQ-9 was used to assess depression, and headache impact test (HIT-6) to assess disability.
Results.— Of 767 participants, 593 fulfilled criteria for EM or CDH and were used in this analysis. The mean age was 42.2 years and 92% were women. The frequency of PTSD was greater in CDH than in EM (30.3% vs 22.4%, P  = .043), but not after adjusting for demographics and depression ( P  = .87). However, participants with major depression and PTSD were more likely to have CDH than EM (24.6% vs 15.79%, P  < .002). Disability was greater in migraineurs with PTSD, even after adjustments (65.2 vs 61.7, P  = .002).
Conclusion.— The frequency of PTSD in migraineurs, whether episodic or chronic, is higher than the historically reported prevalence of PTSD in the general population. In addition, in the subset of migraineurs with depression, PTSD frequency is greater in CDH sufferers than in episodic migraineurs. Finally, the presence of PTSD is independently associated with greater headache-related disability in migraineurs.