Preoperative chemotherapy and pelvic radiation for tethered or fixed rectal cancer: a phase II dose escalation study

PURPOSE: To study the impact of preoperative radiation dose escalation and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the outcome of tethered and fixed rectal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We have treated 156 patients with 3 consecutive preoperative chemoradiation protocols with escalating treatment intensity. Schedule 1 consisted of 40 Gy radiation with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion and mitomycin C. Schedule 2 used a sandwich design with preoperative (40 Gy) and postoperative (18 Gy) radiation with concomitant 5-FU infusion, leucovorin, and mitomycin C. In schedule 3, the preoperative radiation dose was increased to 50 Gy and adjuvant 5-FU/leucovorin chemotherapy was added following surgery. There were 54, 27, and 75 patients treated in schedules 1, 2, and 3, respectively. RESULTS: The resectability was 91% for schedule 1 and 100% for both schedules 2 and 3. A dose-response relationship was observed between the radiation dose and the tumor downstaging and local control. The pathological complete response (T0N0M0) rates for schedules 1, 2, and 3 were 4%, 15%, and 25%, respectively. The respective rates of tumor downstaging were 41%, 33%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year local relapse-free rates were 67% for schedule 1 (40 Gy), 96% for schedule 2 (58 Gy), and 92% for schedule 3 (50 Gy) (p = 0.0011). The addition of postoperative chemotherapy appeared to improve both the survival and the relapse-free survival. The 5-year survival was increased from 52% to 84% (p = 0.0004) and the 5-year progression-free survival was improved from 48% to 74% (p = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: Preoperative 5-FU infusion, leucovorin, mitomycin C, and 50-Gy pelvic radiation, followed by postoperative bolus 5-FU/leucovorin chemotherapy, appeared to be an effective treatment for tethered/fixed rectal cancers. However, its therapeutic efficacy could only be validated in randomized studies.     

Have the changes in treatment of rectal cancer made a significant difference to our patients?

The treatment for patients with locally advanced, resectable rectal cancer has evolved over the years. Various combinations and sequences of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and total mesorectal excision (TME)-based surgery are the mainstay of current therapy. Preoperative combined chemoradiation, followed by surgery, is now the preferred treatment strategy, with the majority of patients receiving either infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine (Xeloda) with radiation. Clinical trials with oxaliplatin (Eloxatin)-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation have not shown improvement in the pathologic complete response rate (pCR) compared with 5-FU; however, final data addressing local recurrence rates and disease-free survival are pending.The use of adjuvant chemotherapy following preoperative chemoradiation and surgery has not been optimally defined. Some studies have shown that patients who obtained significant pathologic downstaging after chemoradiation and surgery have improved survival with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Since FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin) is the preferred adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage III colon cancer based on randomized clinical trial results, FOLFOX is also recommended for rectal cancer patients as an adjuvant therapy approach.     

A phase I/II trial of three-dimensionally planned concurrent boost radiotherapy and protracted venous infusion of 5-FU chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Improving the response to preoperative therapy may increase the likelihood of successful resection of locally advanced rectal cancers. Historically, the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate has been < approximately 10% with preoperative radiation therapy alone and < approximately 20% with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled on a prospective Phase I/II protocol conducted jointly at Washington University, St. Louis and the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome evaluating a three-dimensionally (3D) planned boost as part of the preoperative treatment of patients with unresectable or recurrent rectal cancer. Preoperative treatment consisted of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to the pelvis, with a 3D planned 90 cGy per fraction boost delivered once or twice a week concurrently (no time delay) with the pelvic radiation. Thus, on days when the boost was treated, the tumor received a dose of 270 cGy in one fraction while the remainder of the pelvis received 180 cGy. When indicated, nonaxial beams were used for the boost. The boost treatment was twice a week (total boost dose 900 cGy) if small bowel could be excluded from the boost volume, otherwise the boost was delivered once a week (total boost dose 450 cGy). Patients also received continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1500 mg/m(2)-week) concurrently with the radiation as well as postoperative 5-FU/leucovorin. RESULTS: All 37 patients completed preoperative radiotherapy as planned within 32--39 elapsed days. Twenty-seven underwent proctectomy; reasons for unresectability included persistent locally advanced disease (6 cases) and progressive distant metastatic disease with stable or smaller local disease (4 cases). Actuarial 3-year survival was 82% for the group as a whole. Among resected cases the 3-year local control and freedom from disease relapse were 86% and 69%, respectively.Twenty-four of the lesions (65%) achieved an objective clinical response by size criteria, including 9 (24%) with pCR at the primary site (documented T0 at surgery). The most important factor for pCR was tumor volume: small lesions with planning target volume (PTV) < 200 cc showed a 50% pCR rate (p = 0.02).There were no treatment associated fatalities. Nine of the 37 patients (24%) experienced Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (usually proctitis) during preoperative treatment. There were an additional 7 perioperative and 2 late toxicities. The most important factors for small bowel toxicity (acute or late) were small bowel volume (> or = 150 cc at doses exceeding 4000 cGy) and large tumor (PTV > or = 800 cc). For rectal toxicity the threshold is PTV > or = 500 cc. CONCLUSION: 3D planned boost therapy is feasible. In addition to permitting the use of nonaxial beams for improved dose distributions, 3D planning provides tumor and normal tissue dose-volume information that is important in interpreting outcome. Every effort should be made to limit the treated small bowel to less than 150 cc. Tumor size is the most important predictor of response, with small lesions of PTV < 200 cc most likely to develop complete responses.     

Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control--final report of intergroup 0114.

PURPOSE: The gastrointestinal Intergroup studied postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with T3/4 and N+ rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery to try to improve chemotherapy and to determine the risk of systemic and local failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had a potentially curative surgical resection and were treated with two cycles of chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation therapy and two additional cycles of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens were bolus fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-FU and leucovorin, 5-FU and levamisole, and 5-FU, leucovorin, and levamisole. Pelvic irradiation was given to a dose of 45 Gy to the whole pelvis and a boost to 50.4 to 54 Gy. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred ninety-five patients were entered and fully assessable, with a median follow-up of 7.4 years. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) by drug regimen. DFS and OS decreased between years 5 and 7 (from 54% to 50% and 64% to 56%, respectively), although recurrence-free rates had only a small decrease. The local recurrence rate was 14% (9% in low-risk [T1 to N2+] and 18% in high-risk patients [T3N+, T4N]). Overall, 7-year survival rates were 70% and 45% for the low-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Males had a poorer overall survival rate than females. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage to leucovorin- or levamisole-containing regimens over bolus 5-FU alone in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer when combined with irradiation. Local and distant recurrence rates are still high, especially in T3N+ and T4 patients, even with full adjuvant chemoradiation therapy.     

Chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

The aim of this study was to demonstrate a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of at least 10% with an acceptable toxicity achieved by preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients were treated by radiotherapy targeting 50 Gy and 5-FU/leucovorin intravenously during the 1st, 4th and 7th week after start of radiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. In 71 evaluable patients, the pCR rate was 14.1% (95% CI, 6.0-22.2); the local relapse rate, 6.1%; the 5-year disease-free survival, 54% and the overall 5-year survival, 68%. The most severe adverse events were neutropenia (17%), diarrhoea (17%), infection (8%) and fatal cardiovascular function (1%). This therapy yielded a high rate of pCR, a low rate of local relapse and a long disease-free and overall survival. To increase its feasibility, radiation dose reduction to 45 Gy and administration of only two preoperative cycles of chemotherapy is recommended.     

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for primary colorectal cancer

The management of rectal cancer presents substantial challenges. Patients with T3 and/or node-positive rectal cancers are at high risk for local failure and distant metastases (DM). Adjuvant radiation has been shown to decrease local recurrence (LR) rates; however, this local therapy has not been demonstrated to improve survival when compared to surgery alone. In several prospective randomized trials adjuvant chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil-(5-FU)-based chemotherapy improved LR rates, DM rates, and overall survival (OS). The optimal chemotherapeutic regimen has not been determined; however, studies comparing standard IV bolus 5-FU administration with continuous infusion (CI) 5-FU demonstrated that CI administration was superior. Preoperative therapy has potential advantages over adjuvant therapy such as less acute bowel toxicity and improved sphincter preservation. Preoperative chemoradiation has been shown in several studies to improve LR rates and OS when compared to surgery alone. Our current approach to patients with resectable T3 or N1 cancer in the distal two-thirds of the rectum on preoperative staging is preoperative chemoradiation with planned postoperative chemotherapy. This regimen offers the best chance for local control and disease-free survival while potentially downstaging the tumor and improving sphincter preservation.     

Investigation of the comparative toxicity of 5-FU bolus versus 5-FU continuous infusion circadian chemotherapy with concurrent radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To compare the relative toxicities of bolus versus infusional 5-FU chemotherapy administrated concurrently during external beam irradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following surgical extirpation. METHODS: A total of 26 eligible patients were retrospectively identified as having been treated for rectal adenocarcinoma at the Stratton VAMC between 1989 and 1997. A comparative analysis of treatment dose intensities, treatment delays and toxicities in these patients was performed. RESULTS: Significantly less WBC toxicity was observed in the patients receiving infusional 5-FU chemotherapy. The other toxicities, with the exception of skin toxicity, were generally less frequent in the 5-FU infusional group. When the toxicities were corrected for 5-FU dose intensity, to yield toxicity per mg of 5-FU, statistically significant differences were found for hematological toxicity (WBC and platelets), and for gastrointestinal toxicity (frequency and severity of diarrhea and weight loss). The majority of patients receiving infusional 5-FU therapy were treated using a circadian pattern of treatment peaking around the time of the radiation therapy. Patients receiving infusional 5-FU were able to tolerate over twice the dose intensity as those receiving bolus administration. Local recurrence rate in all patients was 3.8% comparing favorably to other reported studies. Distant recurrence frequency was also acceptable at 34.6% for the group. CONCLUSION: Infusional 5-FU chemotherapy compared with bolus therapy during pelvic radiation minimizes toxicity to the patient while maximizing the dose of 5-FU that can be delivered. As infusional 5-FU therapy during radiation has previously been shown to increase disease free duration and survival, infusional 5-FU should be considered as an acceptable standard of care to prevent local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma following its resection. Shaping this infusional 5-FU chemotherapy within the day so that most of the daily dose is delivered around the time of the radiation therapy may further modify the toxic therapeutic ratio of combined modality therapy.     

Association of statin use with a pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To assess whether 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or statins, might enhance the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1996 and 2001, 358 patients with clinically resectable, nonmetastatic rectal cancer underwent surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for either locally advanced tumors or low-lying tumors that would require abdominoperineal resection. We excluded 9 patients for radiation therapy dose <45 Gy or if statin use was unknown, leaving 349 evaluable patients. Median radiation therapy dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 45-55.8 Gy), and 308 patients (88%) received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Medication use, comorbid illnesses, clinical stage as assessed by digital rectal examination and ultrasound, and type of chemotherapy were analyzed for associations with pathologic complete response (pCR), defined as no microscopic evidence of tumor. Fisher's exact test was used for categoric variables, Mantel-Haenszel test for ordered categoric variables, and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (9%) used a statin, with no differences in clinical stage according to digital rectal examination or ultrasound compared with the other 324 patients. At the time of surgery, 23 nonstatin patients (7%) were found to have metastatic disease, compared with 0% for statin patients. The unadjusted pCR rates with and without statin use were 30% and 17%, respectively (p = 0.10). Variables significant univariately at the p = 0.15 level were entered into a multivariate model, as were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which were strongly associated with statin use. The odds ratio for statin use on pCR was 4.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-12.1; p = 0.003) after adjusting for NSAID use, clinical stage, and type of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In multivariate analysis, statin use is associated with an improved pCR rate after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. The low prevalence of statin use limits the power to detect a significant difference at a type I error threshold of p = 0.05 in this analysis. Although no definitive conclusions can be drawn on the basis of this retrospective study, the unusually high incidence of pCR after chemoradiation suggests that the use of statins in the treatment of rectal cancer warrants further evaluation.     

Carcinoma of unknown primary in the inguinal lymph node region of squamous cell origin: A case series

PurposeCancer of unknown primary (CUP) of the inguinal region is a rare clinical entity that accounts for 1%-3 % of all CUPs. Of the inguinal lymph node region CUPs, about 10%-15% are of squamous cell origin. This study presents a case series of CUP of the inguinal region of squamous cell origin treated in our institution and review of the outcome.Methods and materialsWe have identified 9 patients treated during the period of 1990-2010. All patients were treated radically with chemoradiation. Regimens used were 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination (n = 8) or 5-FU/mitomycin-C (n = 1) regimen. Tumor doses were 5400 cGy (n = 7), 5500 cGy (n = 1), and 5040 cGy (n = 1).ResultsThe median duration of follow-up was 56 months (range, 10-76 months) for the whole group. There were no deaths or local or distant recurrences reported till the last recorded date of follow-up.ConclusionsOur retrospective data showed significant long-term disease control for patients with localized inguinal region CUP of squamous cell origin who received concurrent chemoradiation.     

Neoadjuvant systemic fluorouracil and mitomycin C prior to synchronous chemoradiation is an effective strategy in locally advanced rectal cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation and surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients with previously untreated primary rectal cancer, reviewed in a multidisciplinary meeting and considered to have locally advanced disease on the basis of physical examination and imaging (MRI+CT n=30, CT alone n=6), were recruited. Patients received protracted venous infusion 5-FU (300 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 12 weeks) with mitomycin C (MMC) (7 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus every 6 weeks). Starting on week 13, 5-FU was reduced to 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) and concomitant pelvic radiotherapy 45 Gy in 25 fractions was commenced followed by 5.4-9 Gy boost to tumour bed. Surgery was planned 6 weeks after chemoradiation. Postoperatively, patients received 12 weeks of MMC and 5-FU at the same preoperative doses. Between January 99 and August 01, 36 eligible patients were recruited. Median age was 63 years (range=40-85). Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiological tumour response was 27.8% (one CR and nine PRs) and no patient had progressive disease. In addition, 65% of patients had a symptomatic response including improvement in diarrhoea/constipation (59%), reduced rectal bleeding (60%) and diminished pelvic pain/tenesmus (78%). Following chemoradiation, tumour regression occurred in 80.6% (six CRs and 23 PRs; 95% CI=64-91.8%) and only one patient still had an inoperable tumour. R0 resection was achieved in 28 patients (82%). When compared with initial clinical staging, the pathological downstaging rate in T and/or N stage was 73.5% and pathological CR was found in one patient. Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy as a prelude to synchronous chemoradiation can be administered with negligible risk of disease progression and produces considerable symptomatic response with associated tumour regression.     

Role of mitomycin C in the development of late bowel toxicity foloowing chemoradiation for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix

: To determine if the inclusion of mitomycin C (MMC) in chemoradiation protocols for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) significantly enhances the development of serius (Grade 3) late bowel toxicity (SLBT).

: The incidence of SLBT in 154 patients with LACC entered in six consecutive chemoradiotherapy protocols between February 1982 and June 1987 was determined. Fifty-four patients who were treated with MMC, 5-flourouracil (5-FU), and radiation were compated to 100 patients who received similar treatment without MMC. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed the effect of the following parameters on the development of SLBT: (a) external beam dose, (b) rectal and rectosignoid dose, (c) paraaortic radiation, (d) intracavitary dose and dose rate, (e) volume of tissue irradiated to a total dose od 60 Gy, (f) International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages, (g) age, (h) number of courses of 5-FU, (i) previous abdominopelvic surgery, (j) split versus continuous radiation, and (k) administration of MMC.

: The overall incidence of SLBT was 15.6%: 14 of 54 (26%) versus 10 of 100 (10%) for patients who did or did not receive MMC, respectively (p = 0.009). Multivariate analysis revealed the administration of MMC as the only factor predictive for the development of SLBT (p = 0.012, odds RATIO = 3.15; 95% confidence interval 1.3–7.7). A significant reduction in SLBT was observed with the elimination of MMC from the chemoradiation protocols despite dose escalation of both radiation and 5-FU. No increase in overall survival was observed in patients receiving MMC, 5-FU, and radiation compared with 5-Fu and radiation alone.

: The inclusion of MMC in these chemoradiation protocols for LACC is associated with significant enhancement in serious late bowel toxicity.     

Chemo-Radiotherapy For Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Increased Dose Intensity and Reduced Acute Toxicity with Concomitant Radiotherapy and Protracted Venous Infusion 5-Fluorouracil

Purpose: Although concomitant radiation therapy (RT) and bolus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) have been shown to improve survival in locally confined pancreatic cancer, most patients will eventually succumb to their disease. Since 1994, we have attempted to improve efficacy by administering 5-FU as a protracted venous infusion (PVI). This study compares treatment intensity and acute toxicity of consecutive protocols of concurrent RT and 5-FU by bolus injection or PVI.Methods and Materials: Since 1986, 74 patients with resected or locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with continuous course RT and concurrent 5-FU by bolus injection (n = 44) or PVI throughout the course of RT (n = 30). Dose intensity was assessed for both 5-FU and radiotherapy. Toxicity endpoints which could be reliably and objectively quantified (e.g., neutropenia, weight loss, treatment interruption) were evaluated.Results: Cumulative 5-FU dose (mean = 7.2 vs. 2.5 gm/m², p < 0.001) and weekly 5-FU dose (mean = 1.3 vs. 0.5 gm/m²/wk, p < 0.001) were significantly higher for patients receiving PVI 5-FU. Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, 95% of PVI patients maintained a RT dose intensity of ≥ 900 cGy/wk, compared with 63% of those receiving bolus 5-FU (p = 0.02). No difference was seen for patients with locally advanced disease (72% vs. 76%, p = n.s.). Grade II-III neutropenia was less common for patients treated with PVI (13% vs. 34%, p = 0.05). Grade II-III thrombocytopenia was uncommon (≤ 3%) in both treatment groups. Mean percent weight loss (3.8% vs. 4.1%, p = n.s.) and weight loss ≥ 5% of pre-treatment weight (21% vs. 31%, p = n.s.) were similar for PVI and bolus treatment groups, respectively. Treatment interruptions for hematologic, gastrointestinal or other acute toxicities were less common for patients receiving PVI 5-FU (10% vs. 25%, p = 0.11).Conclusion: Concurrent RT and 5-FU by PVI was well tolerated and permitted greater chemotherapy and radiotherapy dose intensity with reduced hematologic toxicity and fewer treatment interruptions compared with RT and bolus 5-FU. Longer follow-up will be needed to assess late effects and the impact on overall survival.     

Phase I/II study of neoadjuvant bevacizumab,erlotinib and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent external beam radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

BackgroundTo determine the maximal tolerated dose of erlotinib when added to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemoradiation and bevacizumab and safety and efficacy of this combination in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.Patients and methodsPatients with Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound defined T3 or T4 adenocarcinoma of the rectum and without evidence of metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients received infusional 5-FU 225 mg/M2/day continuously, along with bevacizumab 5 mg/kg days 14, 1, 15 and 29. Standard radiotherapy was administered to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. Erlotinib started at a dose of 50 mg orally daily and advanced by 50 mg increments in the subsequent cohort. Open total mesorectal excision was carried out 6–9 weeks following the completion of chemoradiation.ResultsThirty-two patients received one of three dose levels of erlotinib. Erlotinib dose level of 100 mg was determined to be the maximally tolerated dose. Thirty-one patients underwent resection of the primary tumor, one refused resection. Twenty-seven patients completed study therapy, all of whom underwent resection. At least one grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 46.9% of patients. Grade 3–4 diarrhea occurred in 18.8%. The pathologic complete response (pCR) for all patients completing study therapy was 33%. With a median follow-up of 2.9 years, there are no documented local recurrences. Disease-free survival at 3 years is 75.5% (confidence interval: 55.1–87.6%).ConclusionsErlotinib added to infusional 5-FU, bevacizumab and radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is relatively well tolerated and associated with an encouraging pCR.Clinicaltrials.govNCT00307736.     

Is dose/time fractionation important in treating rectal cancer?

In a study to evaluate the effect of increasing dose per fraction on radiation response in rectal cancer, two groups of 29 patients each, matched for extent and size of disease, were evaluated. Group A was treated with conventional dose/fraction (180-200 cGy) X 5 days/week and Group B was treated with 250 cGy/fraction X 4 days/week. Total dose was reduced by 10% in Group B patients to allow comparison of biologically equivalent doses. Two categories of patients were analyzed in each group: patients receiving planned high dose preoperative radiation (4000-4500 cGy); and patients receiving high dose radiation for post-surgical recurrent tumors or locally advanced inoperable tumors (5500-6000 cGy). Tumor regression was markedly better in patients treated with the 250 cGy/fraction. Overall response (greater than 50% regression) was 35% (10/29) in Group A and 62% (18/29) in Group B. Nine of 10 patients in Group B, treated preoperatively, had greater than 50% regression in tumor size, with two patients having no evidence of disease on surgico-pathological evaluation. Six of 10 similar patients in Group A had greater than 50% tumor regression.     

Improved incidence of pT0 downstaged surgical specimens in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with induction oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and preoperative chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy in terms of pathologic response in LARC patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation, with or without a short-intense course of induction oxaliplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 05/98 to 10/02, 114 patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation (4500-5040 cGy + oral Tegafur 1200 mg/day) for cT(3)-(4)N(+/x)M(0) rectal cancer. Starting 05/01, 52 consecutive patients additionally received induction FOLFOX-4, oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) iv d1), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2) iv bolus d1) and 600 mg/m(2) iv continuous infusion in 22 h with leucovorin (200 mg iv) d1 and d2, every 15 days (2 cycles), followed by the previously described Tegafur chemoradiation regime. Surgery was performed in 5-6 weeks. Pathological assessment investigated post-treatment T and N status in the rectal wall and peri-rectal tissues. RESULTS: Patients, tumor and treatment characteristics were comparable between groups. Incidence of pT(0) specimens was significantly increased by induction FOLFOX-4 (P = 0.006). Total T and N downstaging were 58% versus 75% and 42% versus 40%, respectively (P = ns). T downstaging of > or =2 categories was significantly superior in FOLFOX-4 group (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Short-intense induction FOLFOX-4 significantly improves pathologic complete response in LARC patients treated with tegafur-sensitized preoperative chemoradiation. The 44% rate of pT(0)-(1) specimens observed in the oxaliplatin group should impulse innovative surgical approaches to promote ano-rectal sphincter conserving protocols.     

Predictive Factors for Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

Background: An accurate assessment of potential pathologic complete response(pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(NCRT) is important for the appropriate treatment of rectal cancer. However, the factors that predict the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have not been well defined. Therefore, this study analyzed the predictive factors on the development of pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Methods: From January 2008 to January 2018, a total of 432 consecutive patients from a single institution patients who underwent a long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were reviewed in this study. The clinicopathological features were analyzed to identify predictive factors for pathologic complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Results: The rate of pathologic complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation was 20.8%, patients were divided into the pCR and non-pCR groups. The two groups were well balanced in terms of age, gender, body mass index, ASA score, tumor stage, tumor differentiation, tumor location, surgical procedure, chemotherapy regimen and radiation dose. The multivariate analysis revealed that a pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of ≤5 ng/mL and an interval of ≥8 weeks between the completion of chemoradiation and surgical resection were independent risk factors of an increased rate of pCR. Conclusions: Pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of ≤5 ng/mL and an interval of ≥8 weeks between the completion of chemoradiation and surgical resection are predictive factors for pathologic complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Using these predictive factors, we can predict the prognosis of patients and develop adaptive treatment strategies. A wait-and-see policy might be possible in highly selective cases.     

Comparison of three treatment strategies for esophageal cancer within a single institution

Fifty-seven patients with esophageal cancer were treated with curative intent between January 1979 and June 1985. Seventeen were treated with radical radiation therapy alone (TD 4000-6500 cGy in 200-250 cGy fractions). Twenty-five were treated using radiation therapy (3000 cGy in 200 cGy fractions, day 1-19, and 2600-3000 cGy in 200 cGy fractions, day 50-68) and concomitant chemotherapy (5-FU and Cis-platinum). Fifteen were treated preoperatively by radiation therapy (3000 cGy at 200 cGy fractions) and concomitant chemotherapy (5-FU and Cis-platinum) followed by esophagectomy in 2-3 weeks. Chi square tests showed no significant baseline differences between the patients in the three different treatment groups with respect to A.J.C. stage, T status, location of tumor or histology. Median survival and 2-year survival for the three treatment groups were RT alone: 5 months and 0%, RT and chemotherapy: 12 months and 37%, RT, chemotherapy and surgery 13 months and 38%. A Cox multivariate analysis revealed significant predictor variables for increased survival were treatment strategy, RT dose delivered and T status. Increased local control was seen with either multimodality approach compared to radiation therapy alone. Our data suggests that a multimodality approach is superior as a curative treatment strategy, compared to RT alone, in esophageal cancer. In our series no significant differences were seen with respect to treatment outcome between the two multimodality approaches used.     

Improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation regardless of pathologic response

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to examine the effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival in patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and surgical resection.MethodsA retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2006 to 2013 was performed. Cases were analyzed based on pathologic complete response (pCR) status and use of adjuvant therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival probabilities.Results23,045 cases were identified, of which 5832 (25.31%) achieved pCR. In the pCR group, 1513 (25.9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, and in the non-pCR group, 5966 (34.7%) received adjuvant therapy. In the pCR group, five-year survival probability was 87% (95% CI 84%–89%) with adjuvant therapy and 81% (95% CI 79%–82%) without adjuvant therapy. In the non-pCR group, five-year survival probability was 78% (95% CI 76%–79%) with adjuvant therapy and 70% (95% CI 69%–71%) without adjuvant therapy. In the non-pCR and node-negative subgroup (ypN-), five-year survival probability was 86% (95% CI 84%–88%) with adjuvant therapy and 76% (95% CI 74%–77%) without adjuvant therapy. In the non-pCR and node-positive subgroup (ypN+), five-year survival probability was 67% (95% CI 65%–70%) with adjuvant therapy and 60% (95% CI 58%–63%) without adjuvant therapy.ConclusionsAdjuvant chemotherapy in stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma is associated with increased five-year survival probability regardless of pCR status. We observed similar survival outcomes among non-pCR ypN- treated with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with patients achieving pCR treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Definitive irradiation and chemotherapy for radiosensitization in management of anal carcinoma: interim report on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study no. 8314

Following documented evidence of the synergism of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiation therapy and an additive effect with mitomycin and irradiation, pilot studies have demonstrated the potential for definitive radiation therapy in the management of squamous cell and basaloid carcinomas of the anal canal, allowing sphincter preservation. Our study explored the long-term effectiveness of combined therapy at this disease site and examined the feasibility of a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study involving concomitant radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Between 1983 and 1987, 79 assessable patients with any primary tumor stage of anal canal carcinoma were treated by external-beam irradiation combined with mitomycin given by bolus iv injection and 5-FU given by continuous infusion. Radiation was delivered to the perineum and pelvis to a total dose of 4,080 cGy in 4.5-5 weeks. The inguinal nodal areas received 4,080 cGy, calculated at a 3-cm depth in the center of the nodal area. A 96-hour infusion of 5-FU was started on days 2 and 28 of the irradiation at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 over 24 hours, and a bolus injection of mitomycin was administered on day 2 at a dose of 10 mg/m2. The overall survival rates are 97% at 1 year and 73% at 3 years. Patients with lesions less than 3 cm in diameter and those treated strictly according to the protocol did significantly better than those with larger lesions and those whose treatment did not comply with the protocol. The interim outcome of the study demonstrates that this combined therapy is effective for patients with anal cancer and allows preservation of the sphincter and of sexual function.     

Phase I trial of postoperative 5-FU, radiation therapy, and high dose leucovorin for resectable rectal cancer.

Following surgery for Stages T3-4N0-2M0 primary and recurrent resectable rectal cancer limited to the pelvis, 25 patients have been entered on a Phase I trial of pelvic radiation therapy (RT) [5040 cGy] and 12 cycles of postoperative 5-FU and high dose Leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy. 5-FU was escalated 50 mg/m2 while the LV remained constant at 200 mg/m2. The initial doses of 5-FU were: combined-RT/chemotherapy = 200 mg/m2 and post-RT chemotherapy = 325 mg/m2. The median F/U was 25 months (range: 13-36). Two maximum tolerated doses (MTD's) have been determined, one for combined-RT/chemotherapy and one for post-RT chemotherapy. The MTD for combined-RT/chemotherapy was 250 mg/m2; therefore, the recommended dose of 5-FU is 200 mg/m2. The MTD for post-RT chemotherapy was 375 mg/m2; therefore, the recommended dose of 5-FU is 325 mg/m2. The dose limiting toxicities were diarrhea, tenesmus, frequent bowel movements, dysuria, and myelosuppression. For the nine patients who received 5-FU at the recommended dose level the median low counts were WBC 3.5 (2.2-4.0), HGB 10.3 (9.0-12.3), and PLT (x 1000) 167 (133-280), and the incidence of any grade greater than or equal to 3 toxicity was 22% diarrhea, 17% tenesmus, and 22% frequent bowel movements. The recommended dose of combined-RT/chemotherapy as used in this protocol was relatively well tolerated. However, optimal doses of 5-FU cannot be delivered until the fourth postoperative month. Therefore, despite the encouraging results reported with high dose LV in patients with advanced disease, we do not recommend that high dose LV be used with combined RT and 5-FU in the treatment regimen as presently designed.