Ascending-to-descending aortic bypass via posterior pericardium for complex coarctation of aorta

Abstract   We introduce our surgical experience in treating recurrent aortic coarctation or coarctation associated with intracardiac abnormalities, which is difficult to manage. Four patients underwent the operation with hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. During the surgery, the posterior pericardium was opened and the thoracic aorta was dissected and sidebiting clamped, and an end-to-side anastomosis of the artificial graft to the descending aorta was performed. The graft was passed in between the inferior vena cava and the inferior right pulmonary vein and posterior to the pericardium. After that, the aorta was clamped and intracardiac repair was finished. Then the proximal artificial graft was anastomosed to the right side of the ascending aorta with heart beating. All patients recovered smoothly. There was no early or late death, without bleeding or other complications after operation. Conclusion : "Complex coarctation" can be treated with ascending-to-descending aortic bypass via posterior pericardium and satisfied result can be achieved.     

Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis

ObjectiveSutureless aortic valves are a novel option for aortic valve replacement. We sought to demonstrate noninferiority of sutureless versus standard bioprostheses in severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.MethodsThe Perceval Sutureless Implant Versus Standard-Aortic Valve Replacement is a prospective, randomized, adaptive, open-label trial. Patients were randomized (March 2016 to September 2018) to aortic valve replacement with a sutureless or stented valve using conventional or minimally invasive approach. Primary outcome was freedom from major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or valve reintervention) at 1 year.ResultsAt 47 centers (12 countries), 910 patients were randomized to sutureless (n = 453) or conventional stented (n = 457) valves; mean ages were 75.4 ± 5.6 and 75.0 ± 6.1 years, and 50.1% and 44.9% were female, respectively. Mean ± standard deviation Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores were 2.4 ± 1.7 and 2.1 ± 1.3, and a ministernotomy approach was used in 50.4% and 47.3%, respectively. Concomitant procedures were performed with similar rates in both groups. Noninferiority was demonstrated for major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events at 1 year, whereas aortic valve hemodynamics improved equally in both groups. Use of sutureless valves significantly reduced surgical times (mean extracorporeal circulation times: 71.0 ± 34.1 minutes vs 87.8 ± 33.9 minutes; mean crossclamp times: 48.5 ± 24.7 vs 65.2 ± 23.6; both P < .0001), but resulted in a higher rate of pacemaker implantation (11.1% vs 3.6% at 1 year). Incidences of perivalvular and central leak were similar.ConclusionsSutureless valves were noninferior to stented valves with respect to major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events at 1 year in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (alone or with coronary artery bypass grafting). This suggests that sutureless valves should be considered as part of a comprehensive valve program.     

Impact of concomitant aortic regurgitation on long-term outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Background  

Prognostic value of concomitant aprtic regurgitation (AR) in patients operated for severe aortic stenosis (AS) is not clarified. The aim of this study was to prospectively examine the impact of presence and severity of concomitant AR in patients operated for severe AS on long-term functional capacity, left ventricular (LV) function and mortality.     

Ascending-to-descending aortic bypass via right thoracotomy for complex (re-) coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch.

OBJECTIVE: Operation for aortic recoarctation and/or residual hypoplastic arch represents a surgical challenge because of surrounding scar tissue in the coarctation area, hazard of spinal cord ischemia due to aortic cross-clamping, laceration of the recurrent nerve, and the choice of the best approach. We demonstrate the results of 52 operations of an extra anatomically bypass technique via right thoracotomy approach without establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Since 1987, 52 patients underwent extra anatomically positioned ascending-descending bypass grafting. Indication was aortic recoarctation with concomitant hypoplastic aortic arch (45 patients), atypical coarctation of aortic arch (2 patients), congenital anomalies of aortic arch (2 patients) and concomitant aortic coarctation and associated cardiac problems that required surgical repair (2 patient), infected stent-graft of descending aorta (1 patient). Mean age was 19.3 years. Systolic pressure gradients at rest ranged from 35 to 90mmHg; upper extremity hypertension was present in all patients. Operative technique consisted of performing aorta ascending-descending bypass graft size 16 or 18mm in diameter, via right thoracotomy (in 51 patient) or sternotomy (in 1 patient). RESULTS: The mortality rate was 1.9% (1/52). Five patients returned to the operating room (in 3-5 days after operation) for a lymphorrhea complication. An arterial pressure gradient in the limbs was totally corrected. During a follow-up period of actually 79+/-54 months, no adverse event was noticed and antihypertensive medication was stopped in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ascending-to-descending aortic bypass via right thoracotomy is a safe and effective method for management complex (re-) coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch.     

Anesthesia for total and descending aorta replacement and aortic valve replacement for post-repair aneurysm of coarctation of aorta and aortic stenosis

We experienced anesthesia for total arch and descending aorta replacement and aortic valve replacement for post-repair aneurysm of coarctation of aorta and aortic stenosis. Because there was possibility that post coarctectomy syndrome would occur after repair of coarctation of aorta, administration of depressor that acts on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and careful observation were needed postoperatively. In consideration of the development of collateral vessels, preoperative imaging evaluation was added and operative method in cardiopulmonary bypass was adjusted. Careful preoperative evaluation is very important in cardiac anesthesia.     

Ascending-descending aortic bypass for the treatment of concomitant severe co-arctation, aortic valve disease and hypoplastic aortic arch

This report describes a one-stage treatment of a 30-year-old patient suffering from severe aortic valve insufficiency, aortic co-arctation, dilatation of the ascending aorta and arcus hypoplasia. The patient underwent aortic valve, ascending aorta and arch replacement through median sternotomy. The aorta was ligated at the level of the co-arctation, which was located in the proximal part of the descending aorta, and an ascending-descending bypass was created using a transhiatic approach. The postoperative course was complicated by a cerebrovascular accident.     

Two cases of preceded aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis before the cancer operations

We report two cases of aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) before the cancer operations. Severe AS poses a great risk for noncardiac surgery. In the ACC/AHA 2007 Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery, if the AS is symptomatic, elective noncardiac surgery should generally be postponed or canceled. Such patients require AVR before elective noncardiac surgery. On the other hand, in patients with severe AS who refuse cardiac surgery, noncardiac surgery can be performed with a mortality risk of approximately 10%. In our cases, severe AS was found in the preoperative examination. We informed them about necessary AVR before noncardiac surgery, and patients consented to our suggestion. AVR was performed around 7 days after this consent, and cancer operation was performed around 30 days after the AVR. However, there are no clear guidelines for this interval between AVR and cancer operation. In our cases the patients underwent the cardiac surgery and noncardiac surgery in a short period without serious complication in the perioperative management. It is very important to discuss among surgeon, cardiovascular surgeon, cardiologist and anesthesiologist. Especially anesthesiologist should take an important role in organizing these departments for such patients.     

Single-stage repair of aortic coarctation with concomitant bicuspid aortic valve and ascending aortic aneurysm

The optimal surgical management of patients presenting with an aortic coarctation together with other cardiovascular disorders is unclear. In this study, we report the case of an adult male with an aortic coarctation associated with a bicuspid aortic valve and an ascending aortic aneurysm. The patient underwent single-stage repair involving the Bentall technique and total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation, which was performed through median sternotomy. We consider this procedure to be a suitable alternative for treating these complex cases.     

经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄

目的 观察经导管主动脉瓣植入术（TAVI）治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄（AS）的效果。方法 回顾性收集18例接受TAVI的重度AS患者,记录TAVI即刻成功率,观察治疗过程中及治疗后相关并发症;随访记录治疗后1、3个月瓣膜功能及心血管事件。结果 18例实施TAVI成功。对3例AS合并冠心病患者行一站式TAVI+经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,对2例冠状动脉阻塞高风险患者通过“烟囱”或“开窗”技术加以预保护。1例顽固性心力衰竭患者接受体外膜氧合器辅助下TAVI;1例尿毒症患者于TAVI前、后接受血液透析。TAVI即刻成功率100%（18/18）。TAVI过程中1例发生心脏压塞而转外科治疗;1例因中度瓣周漏而植入另1枚瓣膜。治疗后3例存在轻度瓣周漏,1例因三度房室传导阻滞而植入永久性心脏起搏器。未见严重并发症。治疗后即刻及1、3个月,超声心动图显示主动脉瓣口流速［（203.47±70.65）、（219.64±67.49）、278.00（188.50,289.00）cm/s］和跨瓣压差［（17.16±14.05）、0（0,20.50）、12.00（0,32.50）mmHg］均较治疗前［470.50（428.75,553.25）cm/s、79.50（53.25,112.50）mmHg］降低（P均＜0.05）。治疗后3个月内无死亡、卒中、急性冠脉综合征及新发房颤等严重心血管事件发生。结论 TAVI治疗重度AS安全,且短期疗效好。     

Results of prosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

Background: Aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves is associated with a small but constant risk of valve thrombosis and thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. The surgical outcome of patients with Aortic Stenosis who had aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves is reported here. Methods: Between January 1990 and October 1999, 275 patients underwent prosthetic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis. The age ranged between 13 years and 75 years and 230 were males. The cause of aortic stenosis was rheumatic in 185 patients (67.3%), followed by bicuspid aortic valve in 75 patients (27.3%) and degenerative in 15 patients (5.4%). Results: The early mortality was 1.5%. The follow up was 96% complete and ranged from 1 to 104 months (mean 54±24.5months). Six patients (2.2%) developed prosthetic valve endocarditis. Paravalvular leak occurred in 3 (0.9%) patients. Valve thrombosis occurred in 10 patients (1.0% per patient year). The actuarial survival was 81±7% at 5 years and 64±13% at 8 years. Event free survival was 40±14% at 8 years. Conclusion: With current operative techniques and myocardial preservation aortic stenosis patients are at low risk for surgery. However, long term survival is limited due to prosthesis related complications.     

Early results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting

Early results of aortic valve replacement were reviewed in 962 unselected patients, 659 without concomitant coronary bypass surgery (AVR group) and 303 with combined valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR + CABG). The early (less than 30-day) mortality was 4.6% in the AVR, and 5.9% in the AVR + CABG group. Multivariate analysis showed coronary artery stenoses and NYHA functional class to be independent predictors of early mortality in the AVR group, and the number of distal anastomoses as the strongest predictor in AVR + CABG. The incidence of peroperative technical complications in the cases with fatal outcome was 27% in the AVR and 6% in the AVR + CABG group. The incidence of myocardial injury (new Q wave or evidence of increased enzyme leakage) was 11% in AVR and 21% in AVR + CABG. Independent predictors of postoperative myocardial injury were aortic cross-clamp time, year of surgery, coronary artery stenoses and NYHA class in AVR and aortic cross-clamp time and year of surgery in AVR + CABG. The study suggests that coronary artery disease increases risk in aortic valve replacement with or without CABG. Replacement should be undertaken before endstage of the disease (NYHA IV), with CABG if significant coronary disease is present, and in multivessel disease the number of distal anastomoses should be restricted in order to shorten aortic cross-clamp time.     

The optimal timing of aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis

Purpose

The elderly population with severe aortic stenosis (AS) requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR) is increasing. The optimal timing of AVR in these patients has been under discussion.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data from severe AS patients (n = 84) who underwent AVR with/without concomitant procedures from 2005 to 2010. The symptom status, preoperative data, operative outcome, late survival and freedom from cardiac events were compared between elderly patients (age ≥80 years [n = 31]) and younger patients (age <80 years [n = 53]).

Results

The operative mortality in elderly patients (3.2 %) and younger patients (3.8 %) was comparable. The symptoms in elderly patients were more severe and hospitalized heart failure (HF) was more frequently noted as the primary symptom (p = 0.017). Patients with and without hospitalized HF differed significantly in late survival and freedom from cardiac events (p = 0.001), but advanced age had no significant effect. The results of a Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that hospitalized HF was a significant predictor for cardiac events after AVR, irrespective of age (hazard ratio 6.93, 95 % confidence interval 1.83–26.26, p < 0.004).

Conclusions

In elderly patients with severe AS, surgery should be recommended even in the presence of minimal symptoms and should be performed before the onset of life-threatening HF.     

Sutureless aortic valve replacement with concomitant valvular surgery

Objectives

Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) is an alternative technique to standard aortic valve replacement. We evaluated our experience with the Perceval SU-AVR with concomitant mitral valve surgery, with or without tricuspid valve surgery, and aimed to discuss the technical considerations.

Robotic-assisted aortic valve bypass (apicoaortic conduit) for aortic stenosis

Aortic valve bypass (AVB [apicoaortic conduit]) surgery consists of the construction of a valved conduit between the left ventricular apex and the descending thoracic aorta. In our institution, AVB is routinely performed without cardiopulmonary bypass or manipulation of the ascending aorta or native aortic valve. We report the case of an 83-year-old man with severe symptomatic bioprosthetic aortic stenosis, chronic thrombocytopenia, and a patent bypass graft who underwent robotically assisted beating-heart AVB through an anterior minithoracotomy. The distal anastomosis was constructed entirely using robotic telemanipulation. Robotic assistance enables the performance of beating-heart AVB through a small incision.     

Combined emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and valve replacement in a patient with severe aortic stenosis

Simultaneous open surgery has been advocated in the elective management of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients with significant ischemic heart disease, as staged procedures risk worsening myocardial ischemia or aortic rupture, depending on which is the first intervention. The argument for combined aneurysm and valve repair is less established. We describe the case of a 70-year-old female who while awaiting aortic valve replacement suffered rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The patient was successfully managed with emergency combined open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and open aortic valve replacement. We would advocate that such a strategy be considered as a salvage technique in similarly difficult management dilemmas.