Effects of antiepileptic drugs on delivery and early childhood--comparison among mono-therapies of valproic acid, phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital

The effects of antiepileptic drugs (AED) on infants during pregnancy and delivery were studied in a total of 82 epileptic mothers on various monotherapies; 29 cases receiving valproic acid (VPA), 20 receiving phenytoin (PHT), 18 on carbamazepine (CBZ) and 15 on phenobarbital (PB). While AED serum concentrations were low in most cases of VPA, PHT and PB except for one case of VPA which exceeded therapeutic limits, concentrations were within therapeutic levels in many cases of CBZ. Conclusion: When compared with normal controls, abnormal deliveries such as caesarian section were seen more frequently in epileptic mothers under AED treatment. In addition, infants in PB cases were shown to have significantly lower mean birth length, weight and head circumference, suggesting that PB may retard fetal growth. The incidence of malformation in cases of VPA, PHT, CBZ and PB, was 10.3%, 5.0%, 0% and 6.7%, respectively. There were five types of malformation: in VPA cases, spina bifida, Siamese twins and ventricular septal defect tended to be severe, while in PHT and PB cases, cor biloculare and hypospadias respectively were observed. In cases of VPA, serum levels in the umbilical cord were found to be 150% higher than those in the mother.     

Interactions Between Anticonvulsants and Other Commonly Prescribed Drugs

Summary: Many drug interactions can be demonstrated, but only a few are so clinically significant that they necessitate adjusting drug dosages. The same drug combination may produce changes of variable extent or direction in different individuals. The reasons for this variability include genetic control of the rate and inducibility of drug metabolism, and environmental factors such as contact with chemicals. Among antimicrobial agents, chloramphenicol may cause accumulation of phenytoin (PHT) and phenobarbital (PB), and isoniazid may cause PHT, carbamazepine (CBZ), and primidone (PRM) to accumulate. Erythromycin may cause accumulation of CBZ. Among antiulcer agents, antacids may reduce PHT concentration while cimetidine may cause accumulation of PHT, CBZ, and diazepam (DZP). Salicylates displace strongly binding drugs such as PHT, DZP, or valproate (VPA) from the binding sites in plasma proteins, which may lead to some decline of the total plasma level with an increase in the unbound drug percentage. Conversely, anticonvulsants may influence the dosage requirements of oral anticoagulants by inducing their metabolism. Failures of oral contraceptives have been attributed to anticonvulsants in some patients. Probably the most predictable interaction that necessitates dosage adjustment is accumulation of PB caused by VPA. Intentional inhibition of PRM metabolism by nicotinamide serves as an example of attempts to utilize an interaction for improved therapeutic effect.     

Effectiveness and toxicity of phenobarbital, primidone, and sodium valproate in the prevention of febrile convulsions, controlled by plasma levels

The effectiveness and toxicity of phenobarbital (PB), primidone (PRM), and sodium valproate (VPA), used exclusively in monotherapy, were compared in 95 children affected with febrile convulsions. Treatment was restricted to either complicated or simple febrile convulsions with risk factors. The effectiveness and toxicity of each drug were related to the daily dose and the steady-state plasma levels. PB (4.8 +/- 0.7 mg/kg/day) achieved plasma levels of 16.4 +/- 2.8 micrograms/ml and prevented febrile convulsions in 80% of the patients. Side effects were observed in 76.7% of the patients, a change in dose being required only in 13.3%. PRM (17.8 mg/kg/day) yielded PB plasma levels of 14.1 +/- 3.7 micrograms/ml and was effective in 88.2% of the patients. The incidence of side effects was 53%, but no change in treatment was required. VPA (35.2 +/- 5.9 mg/kg/day) achieved plasma levels of 57.2 +/- 15.3 micrograms/ml (measured before the first dose in the morning) and was effective in 91.7% of the patients. Side effects were detected in 45% (significantly lower than after PB, p less than 0.01), and required a change in treatment in 14.3%. No differences in doses and plasma levels were found between patients with or without recurrence of febrile convulsions and with or without side effects; an exception was the higher doses of VPA administered to patients who showed side effects. It is concluded that PRM and VPA were at least as effective and well tolerated as PB. Because the plasma levels of the three drugs were near the lower limit of the therapeutic range, it remains to be elucidated whether higher doses may increase the benefit without adding unacceptable toxicity.     

Effects of Discontinuation of Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, and Valproate on Concomitant Antiepileptic Medication

We report a prospective, controlled study of the effects of the reduction and discontinuation of phenytoin (PHT) (22 patients), carbamazepine (CBZ) (23 patients), and valproate (VPA) (25 patients) with concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The principal changes in the serum concentrations of concomitant AEDs were (a) phenobarbital (PB) concentrations decreased by a mean of 30% on discontinuation of PHT; (b) total CBZ concentrations increased by a mean of 48% and free CBZ concentrations increased by a mean of 30% on discontinuation of PHT, with no change in CBZ-10, 11-epoxide (CBZ-E) concentrations; (c) VPA concentrations increased by a mean of 19% on discontinuation of PHT; (d) VPA concentrations increased by a mean of 42% on discontinuation of CBZ; (e) ethosuximide (ESM) concentrations increased by a mean of 48% on discontinuation of CBZ; (f) PHT concentrations decreased by a mean of 26% on discontinuation of CBZ; (g) PHT free fraction decreased from a mean of 0.11 to 0.07 on discontinuation of VPA; and (h) the mean concentrations of total and free CBZ increased by a mean of 10 and 16%, respectively, on VPA discontinuation, with a concomitant mean 24% decrease in total CBZ-E and a 22% decrease in free CBZ-E. Apart from the decrease in PB concentrations on PHT discontinuation, all significant changes had occurred by 1 week after the end of AED discontinuation. The implication for clinical practice is that a serum AED concentration at this time reflects the new steady state. Free concentrations did not add any clinically useful information to that gained from analysis of total serum concentrations.     

Congenital malformations due to antiepileptic drugs

To identify the major risk factors for the increased incidence of congenital malformations in offspring of mothers being treated for epilepsy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy and, to determine the relative teratogenic risk of AEDs, we prospectively analyzed 983 offspring born in Japan, Italy, and Canada. The incidence of congenital malformations in offspring without drug exposure was 3.1%, versus an incidence with drug exposure of 9.0%. The highest incidence in offspring exposed to a single AED occurred with primidone (PRM; 14.3%), which was followed by valproate (VPA; 11.1%), phenytoin (PHT; 9.1%), carbamazepine (CBZ; 5.7%), and phenobarbital (PB; 5.1%). The VPA dose and level positively correlated with the incidence of malformations. This study first determined a cut-off value of VPA dose and level at 1000 mg/day and 70 microg/ml, respectively, to avoid the occurrence of malformations. The incidence of malformations increases as the number of drugs increases, and as the total daily dose increases. Specific combinations of AEDs such as VPA + CBZ and PHT + PRM + PB produced a higher incidence of congenital malformations. The incidence of malformations was not associated with any background factors studied except for the presence of malformations in siblings. These results indicate that the increased incidence of congenital malformations was caused primarily by AEDs, suggesting that malformations can be prevented by improvements in drug regimen, and by avoiding polypharmacy and high levels of VPA (more than 70 microg/ml) in the treatment of epileptic women of childbearimg age.     

Pharmacology of Cortical Epileptic Afterdischarges in Rats

Summary: Afterdischarges (ADS) elicited by electrical stimulation of the sensorimotor cortical area are characterized by rhythmic spikes and spike-wave complexes in the EEG and by clonic face and forelimb seizures. We studied the sensitivity of such ADS to phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), primidone (PRM), and valproate (VPA) in 78 adult male Wistar rats with implanted electrodes. Neither PHT (30 and 60 mg/kg intraperitoneally, i.p.) nor CBZ (25 and 50 mg/kg i.p.) suppressed cortical ADS. Indeed, ADS were prolonged by higher doses of both drugs. PRM had a similar effect: A dose of 40 mg/kg transiently shortened ADS, but a dose of 80 mg/kg prolonged ADS. PB (20 and 40 mg/kg) and VPA (200 and 400 mg/kg) were effective in suppressing ADS. Higher doses of VPA and PB reduced the intensity of motor phenomena related to the stimuli but had no effect on the motor correlates of ADS. These findings suggest that cortically induced ADS are not a good model of secondarily generalized seizures. The response to VPA and PB suggests that cortical ADS may represent a model of myoclonic seizures.     

Therapeutic antiepileptic drug monitoring: thirteen years of experience in the Laboratory of Clinical Neuropharmacology in the Chair and Department of Developmental neurology

Determining antiepileptic drug (AED) concentration in biological fluids and calculating its dosage on this basis is a long-term method in the treatment of epilepsy. This facilitates the treatment and increases the safety of patients in the aspect of suitable seizure control and reduced risk of side effects. This report presented the range and the number of antiepileptic drug concentration determined during thirteen years activity of Laboratory of Clinical Neuropharmacology in the Department of Developmental Neurology. There was also a number of drug concentrations particularly often determined presented, compared and discussed. Moreover, there were also analyses of subtherapeutic, therapeutic and potentially toxic concentration decomposition presented for subsequent AEDs. The frequency of conventional drug and of slow released forms for VPA and CBZ was compared. VPA appeared to be the most frequently monitored drug and CBZ occurred to be the next one. The concentrations of PHT, PB, PRM and ETH were more rarely determined. In the observed period of time the number of LPP concentration determined in the therapeutic range amounted to 69%, the least frequently the potentially toxic levels were determined--11%. Normal concentrations i.e. therapeutic ones were most often determined for CBZ (77%) and subtherapeutic levels were determined mostly for PHT.     

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs*

Summary: Antiepileptic drug (AED) selection is based primarily on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. However, efficacy is often similar for the different AEDs, and other properties such as adverse effects, pharmacokinetic properties, and cost may also be of importance. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the AED of choice is valproate (VPA). Secondarily generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single AED or combination of AEds. The AEDs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide (ESM) and VPA. For control of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major AEDs can be effective. If VPA cannot be prescribed, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), or primidone (PRM) may be effective, but ESM or a benzodiazepine (BZD) must be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The AEDs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures are CBZ and PHT. Increasing evidence suggests that VPA is a good alternative when CBZ and PHT fail. PB and PRM are second-choice selections because of adverse effects. A combination of two of the five standard AEDs may be necessary to treat intractable seizures, but no studies have been done to indicate an optimal combination. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, alcoholic epilepsy, and status epilepticus require specific AED treatment. Ultimately, AED selection must be individualized. No “drug of choice” can be named for all patients. The expected efficacy for the seizure type, the importance of the expected adverse effects, the pharmacokinetics, and the cost of the AEDs all must be weighed and discussed with the patient before a choice is made. A number of new AEDs with unique mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and fewer adverse effects hold important promise of improved epilepsy treatment.     

Pregabalin drug interaction studies: lack of effect on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, and valproate in patients with partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: Pregabalin (PGB) is an alpha2-delta ligand with demonstrated efficacy in epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. PGB is highly efficacious as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: Given its efficacy as adjunctive therapy, the potential for interaction of PGB with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was assessed in patients with partial epilepsy in open-label, multiple-dose studies. Patients received PGB, 600 mg/day (200 mg q8h) for 7 days, in combination with their individualized maintenance monotherapy with valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), lamotrigine (LTG), or carbamazepine (CBZ). RESULTS: Trough steady-state concentrations of CBZ (and its epoxide metabolite), PHT, LTG, and VPA were unaffected by concomitant PGB administration. Likewise, PGB steady-state pharmacokinetic parameter values were similar among patients receiving CBZ, PHT, LTG, or VPA and, in general, were similar to those observed historically in healthy subjects receiving PGB alone. The PGB-AED combinations were generally well tolerated. PGB may be added to VPA, LTG, PHT, or CBZ therapy without concern for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.     

Risk factors for hyperammonemia associated with valproic acid therapy in adult epilepsy patients

Hyperammonemia is one of the side effects of treatment with valproic acid (VPA), but the risk factors and mechanisms involved remain obscure. This study analyzed the risk factors for hyperammonemia associated with VPA therapy in adult epilepsy patients. A retrospective analysis of 2724 Japanese patients (1217 males and 1507 females aged from 16 to 76years) treated with VPA between January 2006 and December 2010 were analyzed. The ammonia level increased markedly in a VPA dose-dependent manner, and was significantly elevated in patients who also used hepatic enzyme inducers such as phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), carbamazepine (CBZ), and combinations of these drugs. When a blood ammonia level exceeding 200μg/dl was defined as hyperammonemia, the risk factors for hyperammonemia according to multiple regression analysis were a VPA dose >20mg/kg/day (odds ratio (OR): 4.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-10.8) and concomitant use of PHT (OR: 11.0; 95% CI: 3.1-38.7), concomitant PB (OR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.0-17.9), concomitant CBZ (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 0.6-11.9), and concomitant topiramate (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2-6.5). Regimens containing multiple inducers were associated with an increased risk of hyperammonemia. Identification of risk factors for hyperammonemia associated with VPA therapy can help to minimize side effects during its clinical use.     

Adverse effects of carbamazepine,phenytoin, valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in epileptic adult Chinese patients

Objective

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been widely used in patients with epilepsy but the adverse effects in adult Chinese patients have not been investigated. This study evaluated the adverse effects of four commonly prescribed AED monotherapies with carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), and lamotrigine (LTG) in adult Chinese patients with epilepsy.

Methods

The prospective open-label clinical trial was conducted at the Chongqing Epilepsy Center. The study enrolled 505 adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, including generalized tonic–clonic (n = 110), partial and partial secondarily generalized (n = 395) seizures. Patients were evaluated by two clinicians at the Center and were prescribed one type of AED monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA or LTG for a 24-month period. An adverse effect profile, as well as efficacy of monotherapy, was obtained through a face-to-face interview with the patient at each visit. A physical examination and routine laboratory tests were performed during a clinical screening.

Results

A total of 62.6% (316/505) patients successfully completed the AED monotherapy study: 64.3% of those receiving CBZ, 55.9%—PHT, 61.5%—VPA, and 66.2%—LTG. However, 34.7% of the patients discontinued the AED monotherapy because of unsatisfactory seizure control. Overall, 18% of patients experienced adverse effects: for CBZ (25/168; 14.9%), PHT (18/59; 30.5%), VPA (32/192; 16.7%) and LTG (16/86; 18.6%). The most common drug-related adverse events included gastrointestinal disturbances, loss of appetite and nausea, weight gain and fatigue/tiredness. Tremor and nystagmus occurred in some patients receiving PHT and VPA. Two CBZ, one PHT and four LTG patients (n = 7) discontinued the study due to rash.

Conclusion

Adult Chinese patients with epilepsy accepted and tolerated monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA, and LTG. No fatal adverse events occurred. Unsatisfactory seizure control was a primary reason for withdrawal from the AED monotherapy study.     

Effects of chronic use of carbamazepine and valproate on cognitive processes

We investigated effects on cognitive processes of chronic use of carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) in a group of young patients with epilepsy. Scores on various neuropsychological tests were obtained from patients treated with two monotherapy regimens, one involving CBZ and one involving VPA. In general, the cognitive profile of the two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was the same, except for some attention and memory aspects on which the VPA subjects scored better and for some motor tests which the CBZ group performed faster. The latter finding is in accord with results of studies reporting an increase in motor speed induced by CBZ. Furthermore, the observed impairments caused by both CBZ and VPA were relatively mild as compared with those caused by traditional AEDs such as phenytoin (PHT) and phenobarbital (PB).     

Comparison of add-on valproate and primidone in carbamazepine-unresponsive patients with partial epilepsy

PurposeEvaluation of the efficacy of add-on valproate (VPA) or primidone (PRM) in patients with partial epilepsy unresponsive to carbamazepine (CBZ).MethodsThe trial was prospective and open. Patients, aged 8–58 years, with partial epilepsy who did not become seizure free on CBZ were randomized to either VPA add-on or PRM add-on. The baseline period and the evaluation period were both 3 months. Proportions of patients with different degrees of reduction in seizure frequency were determined.ResultsSignificantly more patients on VPA (51% of 68 patients) achieved a greater than 50% seizure reduction than on PRM (34% of 68 patients). There was no significant difference in percentage seizure free (26% and 16%, respectively) or in percentage treatment withdrawals due to adverse effects.ConclusionOur results indicated that the efficacy of the CBZ/VPA combination tends to be greater than the efficacy of the CBZ/PRM combination.     

Seizure freedom with different therapeutic regimens in intellectually disabled epileptic patients.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a frequent condition in persons with intellectual disability and is more often difficult to treat than in the average population. Seizure freedom is the primary therapeutic goal which has important implications for the patient's quality of life. The aim of this study was to find out which antiepileptic therapy regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) are effective in achieving this goal in intellectually disabled epilepsy patients. We were especially interested in the impact of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) which were introduced during the past decade. METHOD: We investigated retrospectively the antiepileptic regimens on which the resident patients of a large epilepsy centre (as a rule with additional intellectual disabilities of different degrees) were seizure free in 2002. Information on antiepileptic medication and seizure frequency was taken out of the individual case documentation. It was also determined whether seizure free patients had already been seizure free in 1992. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty out of 675 patients (35,6%) with epilepsy were seizure free. The proportion of seizure freedom was 43,7% in patients with borderline intelligence, 39,2% in mild, 33,2% in moderate, 31,9% in severe, and 21,9% in profound intellectual disability. One hundred and twenty-two (50,8%) seizure free patients were on monotherapy; 53 of them were on CBZ (PB: 34, VPA: 25, PHT: 7, LTG: 3). Ninety-three patients (38,7%) were on duotherapies, CBZ/PB (27 patients), PB/PHT (17), and LTG/VPA (14) being the commonest. Of 18 (7,5%) triple therapies, LTG/PB/VPA (4 patients) was the commonest. Taken together, the five most frequent therapeutic regimens were CBZ monotherapy, PB monotherapy, CBZ/PB, VPA monotherapy and PB/PHT (a clear preponderance of classic AEDs). A distinction was made between "old seizure free" (seizure free already in 1992) and "new seizure free" (in 1992 still seizures) patients. In the 132 old seizure free patients the classic AEDs prevailed again, monotherapies with CBZ, PB and VPA being the most frequent regimens. In comparison, in the 78 new seizure free patients the novel combination LTG/VPA was the third most frequent, after the classic regimens CBZ/PB and CBZ; PB monotherapies were rare. CONCLUSION:In a majority of intellectually disabled patients with epilepsy (including those who became seizure free since 1992), complete seizure control has been achieved by monotherapy or duotherapy with classic AEDs. Of the new AEDs LTG in combination with VPA appears to be an important innovation.     

A multicenter randomized controlled trial on the clinical impact of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The Italian TDM Study Group in Epilepsy

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical impact of monitoring serum concentrations of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: One-hundred eighty patients with partial or idiopathic generalized nonabsence epilepsy, aged 6 to 65 years, requiring initiation of treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), or primidone (PRM) were randomly allocated to two groups according to an open, prospective parallel-group design. In one group, dosage was adjusted to achieve serum AED concentration within a target range (10-20 microg/ml for PHT, 15-40 microg/ml for PB, 4-11 microg/ml for CBZ, and 40-100 microg/ml for VPA), whereas in the other group, dosage was adjusted on clinical grounds. Patients were followed up for 24 months or until a change in therapeutic strategy was clinically indicated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients with partial epilepsy were treated with CBZ, whereas generalized epilepsies were most commonly managed with PB or VPA. PHT was used only in a small minority of patients. A total of 116 patients completed 2-year follow-up, and there were no differences in exit rate from any cause between the monitored group and the control group. The proportion of assessable patients with mean serum drug levels outside the target range (mostly below range) during the first 6 months of the study was 8% in the monitored group compared with 25% in the control group (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the monitored group and the control group with respect to patients achieving 12-month remission (60% vs. 61%), patients remaining seizure free since initiation of treatment (38% vs. 41%), and time to first seizure or 12-month remission. Frequency of adverse effects was almost identical in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small minority of patients were treated with PHT, the drug for which serum concentration measurements are most likely to be useful. With the AEDs most commonly used in this study, early implementation of serum AED level monitoring did not improve overall therapeutic outcome. and the majority of patients could be satisfactorily treated by adjusting dose on clinical grounds. Monitoring the serum levels of these drugs in selected patients and in special situations is likely to be more rewarding than routine measurements in a large clinic population.     

Impact of mood stabilizers and antiepileptic drugs on cytokine production in-vitro

Changes within the immune system have been reported to contribute to the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder and epilepsy. Interestingly, overlapping results regarding the cytokine system have been found for both diseases, namely alterations of interleukins IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). However, the effect of mood stabilizers and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on these cytokines has not been systematically evaluated, and their effect on IL-17 and IL-22, other immunologically important cytokines, has not been reported. Therefore, we systematically measured levels of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-17, IL-22 and TNF-α in stimulated blood of 14 healthy female subjects in a whole blood assay using the toxic shock syndrome toxin TSST-1 as stimulant. Blood was supplemented with the mood stabilizers or antiepileptic drugs primidone (PRM), carbamazepine (CBZ), levetiracetam (LEV), lamotrigine (LTG), valproic acid (VPA), oxcarbazepine (OXC), topiramate (TPM), phenobarbital (PB), lithium, or no drug. IL-1β production was significantly decreased by PRM, CBZ, LEV, LTG, OXC, PB and lithium. IL-2 significantly decreased by PRM, CBZ, LEV, LTG, VPA, OXC, TPM and PB. IL-22 significantly increased by PRM, CBZ, LEV, OXC, TPM and lithium and decreased by VPA. TNF-α production significantly decreased under all applied drugs. The mechanism of action and side effects of mood stabilizers and AEDs may involve modulation of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-22 and TNF-α signaling pathways. IL-22 may be a research target for specific therapeutic effects of mood stabilizers and AEDs. These drugs might influence cytokine production by modulating ion channels and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors of immune cells.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between common antiepileptic drugs and acetone, the chief anticonvulsant ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet in mice

Purpose:   Acetone is the principal ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet (KD), with demonstrated robust anticonvulsant properties across a variety of seizure tests and models of epilepsy. Because the majority of patients continue to receive antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during KD treatment, interactions between acetone and AEDs may have important clinical implications. Therefore, we investigated whether acetone could affect the anticonvulsant activity and pharmacokinetic properties of several AEDs against maximal electroshock (MES)–induced seizures in mice.
Methods:   Effects of acetone given in subthreshold doses were tested on the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), topiramate (TPM) and valproate (VPA) against MES-induced seizures in mice. In addition, acute adverse effects of acetone–AEDs combinations were assessed in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Pharmacokinetic interactions between acetone and AEDs were also studied in the mouse brain tissue.
Results:   Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.]) enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ, LTG, PB, and VPA against MES-induced seizures; effects of OXC, PHT, and TPM were not changed. Acetone (7.5 mmol/kg) did not enhance the acute adverse-effect profiles of the studied AEDs. Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, i.p.) did not affect total brain concentrations of the studied AEDs. In contrast, VPA, CBZ, LTG, OXC, and TPM significantly decreased the concentration of free acetone in the brain; PB and PHT had no effect.
Conclusions:   Acetone enhances the anticonvulsant effects of several AEDs such as VPA, CBZ, LTG, and PB without affecting their pharmacokinetic and side-effect profiles.     

Aging Variabilities of Level-Dose Relationship in Antiepileptic Monopharmacy—with Reference to Drug Interaction between Mono- and Bipharmacy

Abstract: The influences of age, dose and comedication on the dose-level relationship were investigated using the ratio of plasma level to dose per body weight (/μg/ml/mg/ kg/day) as an index in patients who had received the therapeutic doses of antiepileptic drug(s) for a long term. Samples of the blood concentrations were taken from 1,922 patients ranging in age from one to 40: 1,567 measured values were obtained under medication with pheno-barbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproate (VPA) alone, and 2,201 under medication with any two of the above-mentioned antiepileptic drugs.

• 1) With regard to PB, PHT, CBZ and VPA, when used alone, the L/D ratio was the lowest in the youngest age group, increased toward the latter half of teens, reached a peak at about age 20 and slightly decreased in the rest between the 20s and 30s. The age when the L/D ratio changes with aging is consistent with the age when the body weight of children obviously increases. As a result, during such a term, the fairly constant blood concentration can be maintained without overtly changing the daily dose.
• 2) In the same age group given a single antiepileptic drug, the L/D ratio for PHT steeply increased at the dose of 4 in adults or 5 mg/kg/day in children, while the ratio rather decreased for CBZ and VPA. Clinical considerations should be paid to the fact that there was a non-linear relationship between the dose and the plasma concentration not only of PHT but of CBZ and VPA, and that the turning points were all within the range of therapeutic doses. Namely, that the plasma concentration of PHT is liable to reach a toxic level if the dose is slightly over the critical dose is well known. On the contrary, the innocent increase in the CBZ or VPA dosage only with the aim of obtaining the so-called therapeutic concentration is not always a rational plan of medication because of the nature of the reversed non-linear relationship between these two drugs.
• 3) As regards the interaction of the two antiepileptic drugs, PHT showed no definite tendency with any partner drug; PB showed an increase in the L/D ratio when used in combination with PHT, CBZ or VPA; and CBZ and VPA showed decreases in the L/D ratio when used in combination, regardless of a partner drug. These findings should be borne in mind when we have to deal with polytherapy.