A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial mass lesions

We compared the effects of remifentanil versus fentanyl during surgery for intracranial space-occupying lesions. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remifentanil (0.5 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) IV during the induction of anesthesia reduced to 0.25 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) after endotracheal intubation; n = 49) or fentanyl (dose per usual practice of the anesthesiologist; n = 54). Anesthesia maintenance doses of isoflurane, nitrous oxide, and opioid were at the anesthesiologist's discretion for both groups. There were no differences between opioid groups for the frequency of responses (hemodynamic, movement, and tearing) to intubation, pinhead holder placement, skin incision, or closure of the surgical wound. Adverse event frequencies were similar between groups. Times to follow verbal commands (P < 0.001) and tracheal extubation (P = 0. 04) were more rapid for remifentanil. The percentage of patients with a normal recovery score (were alert or arousable to quiet voice, were oriented, were able to follow commands, had motor function unchanged from their preoperative evaluation, were not agitated, and had modified Aldrete Scores of 9-10) at 10 min after surgery was more for remifentanil (45% vs 18%; P = 0.005). By 20 min, no difference between groups existed (P = 0.27). Anesthesiologists used more isoflurane in the fentanyl group (4.22 vs 1.93 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration hours). Neurosurgeons, blinded to treatment group, favored the use of remifentanil. Similar frequencies of light anesthesia responses and other adverse events suggest that intraoperative depths of anesthesia were similar in the two groups. Under these conditions, emergence was more rapid with remifentanil. This is consistent with the necessity for less isoflurane use in the remifentanil group and the intrinsic rapid clearance of this opioid. IMPLICATIONS: Patients given remifentanil-based anesthesia for craniotomy had faster recovery times from anesthesia than did those given fentanyl-based anesthesia.     

Remifentanil with morphine transitional analgesia shortens neurological recovery compared to fentanyl for supratentorial craniotomy

PURPOSE: To compare the recovery profiles, efficacy and safety of remifentanil and morphine for transitional analgesia with fentanyl in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for supratentorial mass lesions. METHODS: Ninety-one patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, multicentre study. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental and remifentanil (1.0 micro g x kg(-1) bolus and a 1 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion) or fentanyl (1 micro g x kg(-1) bolus and a 1.0 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion). The opioid infusion continued until the level of anesthesia was deemed appropriate for intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with N(2)O/O(2), isoflurane 0.5 MAC and remifentanil 0.2 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) or fentanyl 0.04 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1). At bone flap replacement, either morphine 0.08 mg x kg(-1) (remifentanil group) or saline (fentanyl group) was given. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure was greater in those receiving fentanyl during induction (145.6 +/-17.5 mmHg vs 128.8 +/-18.3 mmHg; P = 0.006) and intubation (126.9 +/-17.1 vs 110.9 +/-16.5 mmHg; P < 0.001). Median time to tracheal extubation was similar but less variable in the remifentanil group (remifentanil = 8 min: range = 2-44 min; fentanyl = 8 min: range = 1-732 min). The fentanyl patients required a longer time to achieve the first normal neurological score (fentanyl = 38.0 min; remifentanil = 26.0 min; P = 0.035). Both the anesthesiologists and the recovery room nurses rated remifentanil better with respect to level of consciousness. Analgesics were required earlier in patients receiving remifentanil; median time 0.5 vs 1.08 hr, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil is a suitable alternative to fentanyl in supratentorial craniotomy. Time to preoperative neurological recovery is faster and morphine provides some transitional analgesia without compromising the quality of recovery.     

A randomized double-blinded multicenter comparison of remifentanil versus fentanyl when combined with isoflurane/propofol for early extubation in coronary artery bypass graft surgery

We compared a fentanyl/isoflurane/propofol regimen with a remifentanil/isoflurane/propofol regimen for fast-track cardiac anesthesia in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study on patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesthesia was induced with a 1-min infusion of 0.5 mg/kg propofol followed by 10-mg boluses of propofol every 30 s until loss of consciousness. After 0.2 mg/kg cisatracurium, a blinded continuous infusion of remifentanil at 1 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) or the equivalent volume rate of normal saline was then started. In addition, a blinded bolus syringe of 1 microg/kg remifentanil or 10 microg/kg fentanyl, respectively, was given over 3 min. Blinded remifentanil, 1 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) (or the equivalent volume rate of normal saline), together with 0.5% isoflurane, were used to maintain anesthesia. Significantly more patients (P < 0.01) in the fentanyl regimen experienced hypertension during skin incision and maximum sternal spread compared with patients in the remifentanil regimen. There were no differences between the groups in time until extubation, discharge from the surgical intensive care unit, ST segment and other electrocardiogram changes, catecholamine levels, or cardiac enzymes. The remifentanil-based anesthetic (consisting of a bolus followed by a continuous infusion) resulted in significantly less response to surgical stimulation and less need for anesthetic interventions compared with the fentanyl regimen (consisting of an initial bolus, and followed by subsequent boluses only to treat hemodynamic responses) with both drug regimens allowing early extubation. IMPLICATIONS: Both fentanyl and the newer opioid remifentanil, when each is combined with isoflurane and propofol, allowed for fast-track cardiac anesthesia. The remifentanil regimen used in this study resulted in significantly less hemodynamic response to surgical stimulation.     

Sevoflurane with remifentanil allows rapid tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents

PURPOSE: After inhalational induction with sevoflurane, we compared the effects of adding remifentanil 1 microg x kg(-1) or remifentanil 2 microg x kg(-1) on conditions for tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents. METHODS: Before anesthetic induction, all patients were given 0.2 mg of glycopyrrolate iv to counteract the bradycardic effects of remifentanil. Two minutes after inhalational induction with 8% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide, 56 female patients with normal airways scheduled for gynecologic surgery were randomized to receive remifentanil 1 or 2 microg x kg(-1) in a double-blind fashion. One minute later, laryngoscopy was initiated for tracheal intubation. Conditions for tracheal intubation and hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation were assessed. RESULTS: Tracheal intubation was successful in all patients. The incidence of post-intubation coughing was lower in the remifentanil 2 microg x kg(-1) group compared to remifentanil 1 microg x kg(-1) group (11% vs 39%, P <0.02). Optimal intubation conditions were also higher in the remifentanil 2 microg x kg(-1) group at 89% vs 54% (P <0.01). However, the higher dose of remifentanil also resulted in a greater decrease in mean arterial pressure (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of remifentanil after sevoflurane induction allows for rapid tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents. The higher dose of remifentanil results in improved conditions for tracheal intubation but also caused a greater decrease in mean arterial pressure. Tracheal intubation using sevoflurane and remifentanil may be an alternative to traditional tracheal intubation with neuromuscular blocking agents.     

A comparison of anaesthesia using remifentanil combined with either isoflurane, enflurane or propofol in patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopy, varicose vein or arthroscopic surgery

BACKGROUND: Anaesthesia comprising remifentanil plus isoflurane, enflurane or propofol was randomly evaluated in 285, 285 and 284 patients, respectively, undergoing short-procedure surgery. METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with propofol (0.5 mg x kg(-1) and 10 mg x 10 s(-1)), and a remifentanil bolus (1 microg x kg(-1)) and infusion at 0.5 microg x g(-1) x min(-1). Five minutes after intubation, remifentanil infusion was halved and 0.5 MAC of isoflurane or enflurane, or propofol at 100 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) were started and titrated for maintenance. RESULTS: Patient demography and anaesthesia duration were similar between the groups. Surgery was performed as daycases (52%) or inpatients (48%). The median times (5-7 min) to extubation and postoperative recovery were similar between the groups. Responses to tracheal intubation (15% vs 8%) and skin incision (13% vs 7%) were significantly greater in the total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) group (P<0.05). Fewer patients given remifentanil and isoflurane (21%) or enflurane (19%) experienced > or =1 intraoperative stress response compared to the TIVA group (28%) (P<0.05). Median times to qualification for and actual recovery room discharge were 0.5-0.6 h and 1.1-1.2 h, respectively. The most common remifentanil-related symptoms were muscle rigidity (6-7%) at induction, hypotension (3-5%) and bradycardia (1-4%) intraoperatively and, shivering (6-7%), nausea and vomiting postoperatively. Nausea (7%) and vomiting (3%) were significantly lower with TIVA compared with inhaled anaesthetic groups (14-15% and 6-8%, respectively; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Anaesthesia combining remifentanil with volatile hypnotics or TIVA with propofol was effective and well tolerated. Times of extubation, postanaesthesia recovery and recovery room discharge were rapid, consistent and similar for all three regimens.     

Clinical usefulness of remifentanil

Anesthesia with remifentanil can be induced either with slow bolus administration (1 microg x kg(-1) for over 60 sec) or with starting the continuous infusion (0.5-1 microg x kg(-1) x hr(-1)) combined with a standard hypnotic agent (i.e. propofol, thiamylal, sevoflurane or isoflurane). According to the patient's requirement observing hemodynamics, the infusion rate of remifentanil should be titrated after tracheal intubation. Because of the rapid onset and short duration of its action, the infusion rate can be increased or decreased safely. Remifentanil is an effective agent in obtunding the stress response to tracheal intubation and surgery. Due to its synergistic effect with hypnotic agents, sevoflurane, isoflurane or propofol, it should be reduced carefully to prevent excessive depth of anesthesia. BIS values should be monitored closely. Remifentanil seems to be as potent as fentanyl. Prior to emergence from general anesthesia using remifentanil, postoperative pain management should be considered. NSAIDs or a long acting opioid could be administered.     

Comparison of Remifentanil and Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Supratentorial Space-occupying Lesions

Background: Remifentanil hydrochloride is an ultra-short-acting, esterase-metabolized micro-opioid receptor agonist. This study compared the use of remifentanil or fentanyl during elective supratentorial craniotomy for space-occupying lesions.

Methods: Sixty-three adults gave written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double-blind, multiple-center trial. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental, pancuronium, nitrous oxide/oxygen, and fentanyl (n = 32; 2 micro gram [center dot] kg [center dot] sup -1 min sup -1) or remifentanil (n = 31; 1 micro [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1). After tracheal intubation, infusion rates were reduced to 0.03 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (fentanyl) or 0.2 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil) and then adjusted to maintain anesthesia and stable hemodynamics. Isoflurane was given only after specified infusion rate increases had occurred. At the time of the first burr hole, intracranial pressure was measured in a subset of patients. At bone flap replacement either saline (fentanyl group) or remifentanil ([nearly equal] 0.2 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1) were infused until dressing completion. Hemodynamics and time to recovery were monitored for 60 min. Analgesic requirements and nausea and vomiting were observed for 24 h. Neurological examinations were performed before operation and on postoperative days 1 and 7.

Results: Induction hemodynamics were similar. Systolic blood pressure was greater in the patients receiving fentanyl after tracheal intubation (fentanyl = 127 +/- 18 mmHg; remifentanil = 113 +/- 18 mmHg; P = 0.004). Intracranial pressure (fentanyl = 14 +/- 13 mmHg; remifentanil = 13 +/- 10 mmHg) and cerebral perfusion pressure (fentanyl = 76 +/- 19 mmHg; remifentanil = 78 +/- 14 mmHg) were similar. Isoflurane use was greater in the patients who received fentanyl. Median time to tracheal extubation was similar (fentanyl = 4 min: range = -1 to 40 min; remifentanil = 5 min: range = 1 to 15 min). Seven patients receiving fentanyl and none receiving remifentanil required naloxone. Postoperative systolic blood pressure was greater (fentanyl = 134 +/- 16 mmHg; remifentanil = 147 +/- 15 mmHg; P = 0.001) and analgesics were required earlier in patients receiving remifentanil. Incidences of nausea and vomiting were similar.     

Fentanyl is more effective than remifentanil at preventing increases in cerebral blood flow velocity during intubation in children

PURPOSE: Controlling the cerebral and systemic hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation may play a role in determining clinical outcome in pediatric neurosurgical patients. This study compared the effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and hemodynamic profile during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in children under sevoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty healthy children aged two to six years undergoing dental surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. Each child was randomly assigned to receive a remifentanil or fentanyl infusion, at a rate of 0.75, 1.0, or 1.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) after induction of anesthesia with 2% sevoflurane. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity was measured by transcranial Doppler (TCD) sonography. Once a baseline set of hemodynamic variables and TCD measurements were recorded, the opioid infusion was started. Measurements were taken at two-minute intervals, starting four minutes prior to laryngoscopy until four minutes following naso-tracheal intubation. RESULTS: Remifentanil caused a more significant decrease in mean arterial pressure and CBFV prior to tracheal intubation than did fentanyl (P < 0.001). During laryngoscopy and for two minutes following tracheal intubation, CBFV increased in all remifentanil groups (P < 0.05), whereas it remained stable in all fentanyl groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that fentanyl was more effective than remifentanil at preventing increases in CBFV during and immediately following laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in children undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia. Fentanyl also seemed to provide a more stable hemodynamic profile prior to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation when compared to remifentanil.     

A comparison of the remifentanil and fentanyl adverse effect profile in a multicenter phase IV study

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of adverse effects of remifentanil and fentanyl in a large and diverse patient population. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label study. SETTING: Multicenter study including academic and community hospitals. PATIENTS: 2,438 adult patients (1,496 outpatients and 942 inpatients) scheduled for elective surgical procedures under general endotracheal anesthesia of at least 30-minute duration. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous (IV) remifentanil (n = 1,229) 0.5 microg/kg/min for induction and tracheal intubation followed by an infusion rate of 0.25 microg/kg/min or fentanyl (n = 1,209) administered according to the anesthesiologist's usual practice. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol and/or isoflurane (with or without nitrous oxide) titrated according to protocol. Transition analgesia with either morphine or fentanyl was administered in the remifentanil and, at the anesthesiologist's discretion, in the fentanyl group. MEASUREMENTS: The overall nonspecific and specific (i.e., opioid-related) adverse effects were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Remifentanil was associated with more intraoperative hypotension than fentanyl (p < 0.05). All four cases (0.3%) of muscle rigidity occurred in the remifentanil-treated outpatients. There were no significant differences between the two drugs with respect to other adverse events (i.e., episodes of hypertension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, and apnea). CONCLUSIONS: In the doses used, both remifentanil and fentanyl have a similar frequency of adverse effects except for the higher frequency of hypotension associated with the use of remifentanil.     

Nitrous oxide induces paradoxical electroencephalographic changes after tracheal intubation during isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia

In this randomized, double-blind, controlled study, we tested the hypothesis that nitrous oxide (N2O) affects bispectral index (BIS) and 95% spectral edge frequency (SEF95) in response to tracheal intubation during anesthesia with isoflurane and sevoflurane. In protocol 1, we randomly allocated 90 ASA physical status I patients to 6 groups (n = 15 each). Anesthesia was induced with isoflurane or sevoflurane with 0%, 33%, or 66% N2O. The concentration of isoflurane and sevoflurane was gradually increased and end-tidal concentrations were maintained at 1.1% and 1.7%, respectively. Tracheal intubation was performed 12 min after induction of anesthesia. BIS was significantly increased 1 min after tracheal intubation compared before laryngoscopy in patients receiving only isoflurane or sevoflurane (P = 0.001 and 0.007, respectively). In patients receiving 66% N2O-isoflurane or 66% N2O-sevoflurane, both BIS and SEF95 were significantly decreased after tracheal intubation and significantly lower than in those patients receiving only isoflurane or sevoflurane, respectively (P < 0.01 for both). In protocol 2, 3 microg/kg of IV fentanyl completely abolished the decrease of BIS and SEF95 after tracheal intubation during anesthesia with 66% N2O-isoflurane and 66% N2O-sevoflurane (n = 10). We conclude that 66% N2O induced a paradoxical decrease of BIS in response to tracheal intubation during anesthesia with isoflurane and sevoflurane.     

Comparison of the effects of remifentanil or fentanyl on anaesthetic induction characteristics of propofol,thiopental or etomidate

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was designed to compare the effects of remifentanil or fentanyl on anaesthetic induction characteristics of propofol, thiopental or etomidate. METHODS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in six groups of 12 individuals each. In three groups, fentanyl was given as a bolus dose of 1.5 microg kg(-1), whereas the others received a remifentanil infusion at 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1). Five minutes later, propofol, thiopental or etomidate were titrated to a state of unresponsiveness. Assessment included the amounts of drug necessary for induction, haemodynamics and the times to apnoea, loss of eyelash reflex, and the release of a water-filled syringe held in the patient's hand. RESULTS: Induction times to loss of the eyelash reflex were significantly shorter in the remifentanil than in the fentanyl groups: with propofol 50.7 +/- 13.6s (mean +/- SD) versus 74.9 +/- 27.0s (P < 0.01), with thiopental 42.9 +/- 16.8s versus 77.2 +/- 27.8s (P < 0.01) and with etomidate 54.7 +/- 17.6s versus 72.3 +/- 24.0s (P < 0.05). The times to respiratory arrest or for the syringe to fall were significantly shorter with remifentanil than with fentanyl for propofol and for thiopental, but not for etomidate. In terms of dosages per kg body weight necessary to achieve unresponsiveness, less propofol (-29%, P < 0.05), thiopental (-25%, P < 0.05) or etomidate (-32%, P < 0.01) was necessary with remifentanil than with fentanyl. Haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation were controlled more effectively with remifentanil. However, within the remifentanil groups, mean arterial pressure significantly decreased during induction: -26% with propofol, -181% with thiopental and -14% with etomidate (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During anaesthetic induction, a remifentanil infusion of 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1) over 5 min is a suitable alternative to a 1.5 microg kg(-1) bolus dose of fentanyl: induction times are shorter with reduced amounts of propofol, thiopental or etomidate.     

Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In some situations, the use of muscle relaxants (neuromuscular blocking drugs) are undesirable or contraindicated. We compared intubating conditions without muscle relaxants in premedicated patients receiving either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1). METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 80 healthy patients were assigned to one of four groups (n = 20). After intravenous atropine, alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) were injected over 90 s followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1). Ninety seconds after administration of the propofol, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were attempted. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor on the basis of ease of lung ventilation, jaw relaxation, laryngoscopy, position of the vocal cords, and patient response to intubation and slow inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff. RESULTS: Seven patients who received remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) and one patient who received remifentanil 3 microg kg(-1) could not be intubated at the first attempts. Excellent intubating conditions (jaw relaxed, vocal cords open and no movement in response to tracheal intubation and cuff inflation) were observed in those who received either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) (45% of patients) or remifentanil in doses of 2 microg kg(-1) (20%), 3 microg kg(-1) (75%) or 4 microg kg(-1) (95%). Overall, intubating conditions were significantly better (P < 0.05), and the number of patients showing excellent conditions were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in patients who received remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) compared with those who received alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1). No patient needed treatment for hypotension or bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) and propofol 2 mg kg(-1) administered in sequence intravenously provided good or excellent conditions for tracheal intubation in all patients without the use of muscle relaxants.     

Comparison of remifentanil in combination with isoflurane or propofol for short-stay surgical procedures

There are few data in the literature that describe the use of remifentanil when administered as a component of an inhalation or total i.v. anaesthetic (TIVA) technique. We studied 251 male and female patients, aged 18-75 years, ASA I-II, undergoing inguinal hernia repair, arthroscopic knee surgery or varicose vein surgery of at least 30 min duration without premedication. Patients were randomized to receive a remifentanil loading dose of 1.0 microgram kg-1 followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 microgram kg-1 min-1 in combination with isoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.6%), (Group I, n = 115) or propofol (initial infusion rate 9 mg kg-1 h-1 reduced to 6 mg kg-1 h-1 after 10 min), (Group P, n = 118). The remifentanil infusion rate was reduced by 50%, 5 min after tracheal intubation. Intraoperative stresses were treated with a remifentanil bolus (1 microgram kg-1) followed by an increase in the remifentanil infusion rate. At the insertion of the last suture, the remifentanil infusion and concomitant anaesthetic were switched off simultaneously. Times to spontaneous respiration, adequate respiration and tracheal extubation were significantly shorter in group I compared with group P (6.4 min vs 7.6 min, P < 0.01; 7.6 min vs 9.3, P < 0.003; 7.8 min vs 9.5 min, P < 0.015). Overall mean systolic blood pressures during surgery were greater in group P compared with group I (P < 0.05) but the absolute differences were clinically insignificant (4-5 mm Hg).      

Less postoperative nausea and vomiting after propofol + remifentanil versus propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia during plastic surgery

BACKGROUND: The effect of different opioids on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) has not been conclusively determined yet, thus the aim of this study was to compare the incidence of PONV in propofol-anaesthetized patients receiving either fentanyl or remifentanil as opioid supplement. METHODS: Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for plastic surgery gave their written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and fentanyl (n = 30; 2 microg kg(-1)) or remifentanil (n = 30; 1 microg kg(-1)). After tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, oxygen in air and an infusion of the opioid studied, which was modified according to clinical criteria. Baseline postoperative analgesia was achieved with intravenous propacetamol + metamizol. Intravenous morphine was given if visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain was > or = 4 (scale 0-10) and metoclopramide was administered if a patient presented > or = 2 PONV episodes (nausea or vomiting) in less than 30 min. Postoperatively (2, 12 and 24 h), we registered VAS, rescue morphine consumption, number of patients with episodes of PONV and number of patients requiring metoclopramide. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic parameters, ASA physical status, propofol dose, VAS, and rescue morphine requirements. Fourteen patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented PONV episodes 2-12 h postoperative hours' interval; (P < 0.05). Ten patients in the fentanyl group and four in the remifentanil group presented vomiting episodes in the same period (P < 0.05); and eight patients in the fentanyl group and one in the remifentanil group required metoclopramide; (P < 0.05). The number of postoperative PONV episodes were low, both in the 0-2-h period (n = 2 vs. n = 1, fentanyl and remifentanil, respectively) and in the 12-24-h period (n = 3 vs. n = 1). CONCLUSION: Propofol + fentanyl anaesthesia resulted in a higher incidence of PONV and requirements of antiemetic drugs in the period between 2 and 12 postoperative hours compared with propofol + remifentanil, in patients undergoing plastic surgery.     

Lightwand tracheal intubation with and without muscle relaxation

BACKGROUND: Lightwand tracheal intubation is a suitable technique for patients who are difficult to intubate but who are receiving effective ventilation. The effect of muscle relaxants on the efficacy of lightwand intubation has not yet been evaluated. The authors conducted a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the effectiveness and incidence of complications of lightwand tracheal intubation performed during general anesthesia with and without the use of a muscle relaxant in patients with apparently normal airway anatomy. METHODS: One hundred seventy-six patients who required orotracheal intubation were prospectively included. Anesthesia was administered using propofol (2 mg/kg, then 3 mg . kg (-1). h(-1)) and remifentanil (1 microg/kg, then 0.3 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1)). Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups (n = 88 for each) to receive rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg or saline intravenously. Lightwand orotracheal intubation (Trachlight; Laerdal Medical Inc., Armonk, NY) was attempted after 3 min. The authors recorded the number of successful intubations, the number of attempts and their duration, and events during the procedure. RESULTS: The failure rate of lightwand intubation was 12% in the placebo group and 2% in the rocuronium group (P = 0.021). Patients in the placebo group received more multiple intubation attempts (P < 0.001), required a greater intubation time (77 +/- 65 vs. 52 +/- 31 s; P = 0.002) and experienced a greater incidence of events during intubation (61 vs. 0%; P < 0.001) than patients in the rocuronium group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of muscle relaxants in patients with apparently normal airways is associated with a lower failure rate, decreased intubation time, and fewer attempts when performing lightwand orotracheal intubation.     

A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We investigated the haemodynamic stability and emergence characteristics of isoflurane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia supplemented with remifentanil or fentanyl in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with propofol (1-2 mg kg-1) and either remifentanil (0.5 microgram kg-1) or fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1), followed by an infusion of remifentanil (0.2 microgram kg-1 min-1) or fentanyl (2 micrograms kg-1 h-1). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in haemodynamic variables, postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting. After induction there was a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure for both groups (P < 0.001) and a decrease in heart rate (P = 0.001) in the remifentanil group. In both groups these haemodynamic changes continued during maintenance of anaesthesia (P < 0.05). The time to eye opening after surgery was significantly shorter with remifentanil compared with fentanyl (6.62 +/- 3.89 vs. 18.0 +/- 15.18 min, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Remifentanil appears to be a comparable opioid to fentanyl when supplementing isoflurane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.     

Dose-response of remifentanil for tracheal intubation in infants

To compare the dose-response of remifentanil for tracheal intubation in infants and children, 32 healthy full-term infants and 32 children were anesthetized with 10 mug/kg glycopyrrolate and 4.0 mg/kg propofol and administered 1 of 4 doses of remifentanil (1.25, 1.50, 1.75, or 2.00 microg/kg) to facilitate tracheal intubation. We determined the effective doses of remifentanil in 50% (ED50) and 98% (ED98) of patients by using logistic regression analysis. We found that logistic regression curves were similar for infants and children (P = 0.38). ED50 and ED98 values for remifentanil were 1.70 +/- 0.1 microg/kg and 2.88 +/- 0.5 microg/kg, respectively. In a second double-blind study, 24 infants were anesthetized with propofol and randomized to receive either 3.0 microg/kg remifentanil or 2.0 mg/kg succinylcholine to facilitate tracheal intubation. The duration of apnea, tracheal intubating conditions and hemodynamic changes were determined. We found that the duration of apnea and intubating conditions after propofol/remifentanil were similar to those after propofol/succinylcholine. Bradycardia, hypotension, and chest wall rigidity did not occur. We conclude that the dose-response of remifentanil for tracheal intubation is similar in infants and children. Propofol/remifentanil provides clinically acceptable intubating conditions, stable hemodynamics, and a duration of apnea comparable to that with propofol/succinylcholine in infants.     

Comparison of effects of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl on cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effects of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl were compared on cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients. METHODS: Eighty morbidly obese ASA I-II patients were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into four groups to receive either 1 microgkg(-1) fentanyl (Group F), 10 microgkg(-1) alfentanil (A), 1 microgkg(-1) followed by an infusion of 0.5 pg kg min(-1) remifentanil (R) or saline (P). The patients corrected weight was used to calculate the drug doses. Body mass indices (range) were: 54.3 +/- 7.37 (49-78.4), 55.67 +/- 7.44 (48.5-78.4), 53.17 +/- 5.36 (48.1-63.2), and 56.3 +/- 6.09 (46.6-67.7) kg m(-2), in Groups F, R, A and P respectively. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures and heart rate were measured non-invasively at three time points, which were 2 min before induction, 2 min after induction and 2 min after endotracheal intubation. RESULTS: After induction of anaesthesia, arterial pressures decreased significantly in all groups, but the decrease was more pronounced in Groups A and R. After induction, heart rate decreased significantly in all groups except in Group P. After intubation, haemodynamic responses were similar in the remifentanil, fentanyl and alfentanil groups and were within normal limits. In Group P, arterial pressures and heart rates were significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Alfentanil, fentanyl and remifentanil in the doses described had similar effects in controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation in ASA I-II morbidly obese patients.     

Intraarticular fentanyl compared with morphine for pain relief following arthroscopic knee surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the analgesia produced by comparable doses of intra-articular (IA) morphine and fentanyl. METHODS: Sixty-nine healthy patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery received a standardized general anesthetic of 4 mg x kg(-1) thiopental and 2 microg x kg(-1) fentanyl followed by 2 mg x kg(-1) succinylcholine prior to tracheal intubation and controlled ventilation. Maintenance of anesthesia was achieved with N2O/O2 and isoflurane. At the conclusion of surgery intra-articular injection was: Group I (n=23) 50 microg fentanyl in 20 ml saline; Group II (n=24) 3 mg morphine in 20 ml saline; Group III (n=22) 20 ml saline. Pain scores at rest using a visual analogue scale were recorded by a separate blinded observer at one, two, four, and eight hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Pain scores at one, two, four, and eight hours were 36, 26.3, 20.9, and 12.8 vs 35.8, 33.8, 28.8, and 21.9 vs 70.5, 57.7, 58.4, and 53.6 for the IA-fentanyl, IA-morphine, and control groups respectively. Pain scores were greater at all times for Group III. Pain scores for Groups I and II were similar at one hour, but thereafter were less (P < 0.001) for the IA-fentanyl group. CONCLUSION: Better postoperative analgesia was achieved with 50 microg intraarticular fentanyl than with 3 mg intraarticular morphine.     

The effect of different isoflurane-fentanyl dose combinations on early recovery from anesthesia and postoperative adverse effects

We evaluated the effect of different combinations of fentanyl-isoflurane on early recovery from anesthesia in 80 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 microg/kg and thiopental 5 mg/kg. Nitrous oxide was not used and patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups: Group 1 (n = 20) received 0.6% end-tidal isoflurane plus fentanyl, Group 2 (n = 20) received 1.2% end-tidal isoflurane plus fentanyl, Group 3 (n = 20) received 1.8% end-tidal isoflurane plus fentanyl, and Group 4 (n = 20) received only isoflurane. In Groups 1, 2 and 3 isoflurane concentration was kept constant and fentanyl was given as necessary to maintain the mean arterial blood pressure within +/- 10% of the minimum mean arterial blood pressure measured in the ward. In Group 4, isoflurane concentration was adjusted to maintain mean arterial blood pressure as above. At the end of skin closure isoflurane was discontinued and the time to spontaneous breathing (TSB), time to extubation (TE) and time to eye opening (TEO) were recorded. In the postanesthesia care unit, the degree of sedation, respiratory rate, Spo(2), emesis, pain, and morphine consumption were evaluated every 15 min for 1 h, and thereafter every 30 min until discharge. Fentanyl requirements were 8.3 +/- 4.5 microg/kg (mean +/- sd) in Group 1, 3.8 +/- 1.3 microg/kg in Group 2, and 3.0 +/- 0.7 microg/kg in Group 3 (P < 0.001), whereas in Group 4 the mean end-tidal concentration of isoflurane was 2.0% +/- 0.4%. Although the mean TSB was <5.5 min in all groups, TE increased from 7.3 +/- 5.1 min in Group 1 to 20.6 +/- 10.7 min in Group 4 (P < 0.001), and TEO increased from 7.4 +/- 5.1 min in Group 1 to 25.8 +/- 9.4 min in Group 4 (P < 0.001). There were no differences among the groups in any of the variables measured in the postanesthesia care unit. This study shows that the combination of a small concentration of isoflurane and a relatively larger dose of fentanyl results in a faster recovery from anesthesia than the inverse combination of doses. IMPLICATIONS: A fast recovery from anesthesia increases patient safety. This study shows that the combination of a small concentration of isoflurane and a relatively larger dose of fentanyl results in a faster recovery from anesthesia than the inverse combination of doses.