The Short-Term Impact of Adjunctive Tiagabine on Health-Related Quality of Life

Summary: Combinations of tiagabine (TGB), carbamazepine (CBZ), and phenytoin (PHT) were compared for their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and adverse effects related to treatment efficacy for people with frequent complex partial seizures. Two independent, randomized, double-blind clinical trials for efficacy and safety were conducted simultaneously with treatment groups: CBZ+PHT versus CBZ+TGB, and PHT+CBZ versus PHT+TGB. Treatment was initiated at week 0 and continued through week 16. HRQOL was evaluated with the QOLIE-89. Treatment success was defined as ≥50% reduction in complex partial seizures. Among patients who achieved a ≥50% reduction in seizures, addition of TGB to baseline PHT enhanced patient perceptions of attention/concentration (13%; p = 0.002), memory (17%; p = 0.042), and language subscales (22%; p = 0.004). Addition of CBZ to PHT led to positive change in the work/driving/social relations subscale (14%; p = 0.004). These improvements were significantly different only between visits, not between the two treatment groups. Seizure worry subscale scores showed improvement among all treatment groups and was probably related to participation in the clinical trial. These exploratory analyses suggest a possible early positive effect of TGB on patient-perceived cognitive domains using the QOLIE-89. These findings are limited by the small sample size and could be related to reduction in seizures.     

Determinants of tiagabine (TGB) efficacy and safety. A Polish multicenter study of 1307 patients with focal epilepsy

Tiagabine (TGB) is a novel anti-epileptic drug providing new therapeutic possibilities to patients with focal seizures resistant to treatment. Since there is no clear algorithm for the best add-on therapy, the aim of our work was to establish factors that statistically significantly affect tiagabine efficacy and toxicity in patients with focal seizures. Data in the study were obtained from over 200 neurologists all over Poland. A group of 1307 patients aged from 3.5 to 80 years with drug-resistant focal epilepsy participated in the study. They were under observation for 16 weeks when receiving TGB as an add-on therapy. Prior to TGB treatment they had at least 1 seizure per month (mean 7.42 +/- 9.86) during the past 3 months. On the study completion 40.47% of the patients were seizure-free for at least a month. Two factors turned out to be significant for TGB efficacy: the number of drugs used since the onset of epilepsy (p = 0.005) and seizure type (p = 0.047). The best outcome was attained in patients with simple partial seizures. Co-medication with phenytoin was better than TGB + carbamazepine or TGB + valproic acid. The factor determining the presence of side effects was the rate of TGB dose increment during the first six weeks of treatment. Toxicity of TGB was not related to its target dose. Tiagabine is a safe and efficient anti-epileptic drug for children and adults with focal epilepsy. Efficacy of tiagabine treatment depends on the number of drugs administered since the epilepsy onset and on the type of seizures. A slow dose increment is crucial for safety of TGB treatment.     

Tiagabine (Gabitril) Experience in Children

Summary: Tiagabine (TGB) is indicated as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures in adults and children aged 12 years and older. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of TGB treatment are under way in younger children with various forms of epilepsy. The results of pediatric pharmacokinetic trials indicate patterns similar to those seen in adults. An open-label study was conducted in the United States in 31 children with refractory complex partial seizures, with doses escalated every 2 weeks by 0.25 mg/kg up to a maximal daily dose of 1 mg/kg. Twenty-nine patients were treated with TGB for >1 year; 26 completed the study, of whom 18 were receiving monotherapy at study completion. A European dose-escalation study evaluated TGB (0.25–1.5 mg/kg/day) as add-on therapy in 52 children aged 2–15 years. TGB appeared to be more effective in localization-related epilepsy syndromes, with 17 of 23 patients with localization-related epilepsy having a 33% median reduction of seizure rate compared with baseline in the fourth month of treatment, and six patients having ≥50% seizure rate reduction. In this study, myoclonic seizures and spasms showed a poor response as opposed to encouraging findings reported by other groups with these seizure types. The adverse effect profile of TGB in children with epilepsy is similar to that in adults. In the U.S. study, most common adverse events were related to the central nervous system (CNS) and decreased over time. In the European study, mostly mild to moderate adverse events, including asthenia (19%), nervousness (19%), dizziness (17%), and somnolence (17%), were reported by 83% of TGB-treated children (39% of children reported adverse events during the single-blind placebo period). In summary, preliminary pediatric data with TGB suggest particular efficacy against epilepsy characterized by partial seizures or other syndromes, and further investigation is warranted.     

Review of Controlled Trials of Gabitril (Tiagabine): A Clinician's Viewpoint

Summary: A recent problem for doctors has been the choice of which new antiepileptic drug (AED) to select for treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. This article summarizes the clinical experience to date regarding the efficacy and safety of tiagabine (TGB; Gabitril) as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial-onset seizures. In its early Phase II development, TGB was evaluated in two multicenter pilot studies. Each had an open-label enrichment phase followed by a treatment phase with randomized, double-blind, two-period, cross-over phases. Between 24 and 50% of patients experienced reductions in seizure rates of ≥50%, depending on the type of partial seizure. In Phase III, three double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled adjunctive studies determined the efficacy of TGB in patients with refractory partial seizures. The first was a dose-response study employing doses of TGB-HCl of 16, 32 or 56 mg/day. Significant reductions in seizure rates were found with 32 and 56 mg/day. The second and third studies evaluated the efficacy of dosing TGB twice, three times, and four times daily, all of which showed similar efficacy. TGB efficacy in partial seizures was supported in several open trials, and no tolerance to efficacy was noted in long-term continuation studies. Tolerability was documented in all trials. Most adverse events were mild or moderate and transient, occurring during dose titration. They were clearly dose-related. No relevant changes in hematologic and biochemical tests, vital signs, or body weight were attributable to TGB. TGB appears to be an effective new drug for partial seizures with an acceptable safety profile.     

Tiagabine as add-on therapy may be more effective with valproic acid – open label, multicentre study of patients with focal epilepsy

The aim of the current study was to review the efficacy of tiagabine (TGB) as add-on therapy in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy under normal daily clinical practice, and try to identify those who had improvement. This was an open multicentre study conducted in Poland. A group of 330 patients were analysed. Patients received TGB up to 30-50 mg/day with adjustment within the therapeutic range and titration period. For statistical evaluation chi-square test and logistic analysis were used. At the 16-week follow-up visit, 71.4% patients were reported as responders, i.e. had a 50% or greater decrease in seizure frequency compared with baseline (P<0.001). One-third of patients were seizure-free at 16-week evaluation (P<0.001). The beneficial effect of TGB on seizure reduction was most marked in patients with partial seizures (P<0.001). Patients who used valproic acid (mean dose 1307 mg/day) had 61-85% higher chances for disappearance of seizures or reduction of their number by 50% or more. Patients who used carbamazepine (mean dose 800 mg/day) at a dose 1000 mg or higher mg/day had twice lower chance for reduction of seizures by 50% or more (OR=0.45; 95 CI 0.25-0.82). There was no statistical impact of sex, age and aetiology on probability of therapeutic effect.     

Tiagabine Monotherapy in the Treatment of Partial Epilepsy

Summary: Three studies were conducted to assess tiagabine (TGB) hydrochloride monotherapy in patients with partial seizures. The first was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 11 patients (seven TGB, four placebo) undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Baseline antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy was discontinued abruptly before monotherapy. Although 24-h seizure rates increased during monotherapy in both groups, patients receiving TGB experienced fewer seizures than placebo patients. Subsequent studies (an open-label, dose-ranging study; n = 31 and a double-blind, randomized comparison of 6 and 36 mg/day TGB; n = 102 and 96, respectively) involved discontinuation of baseline AEDs. In the dose-ranging study, 19 of 31 patients (61%) converted to TGB monotherapy, with a mean final dose of 38.4 mg/day (range 24–54 mg/day) in those who completed the study ( n = 12). In the low- vs. high-dosage study, median 4-week complex partial seizure rates decreased significantly in patients from both dose groups who completed the monotherapy period ( p <0.05 compared with baseline). In the intent-to-treat analysis, significantly more patients in the high-dose group experienced a reduction in seizures of at least 50% compared with the low-dose group ( p = 0.038). Overall, the types of adverse events with TGB monotherapy were similar to those observed in add-on trials. These initial trials in difficult-to-treat epilepsy patients indicate that TGB monotherapy may provide a new approach to the treatment of patients with partial seizures refractory to other AEDs.     

Tiagabine: Efficacy and Safety in Adjunctive Treatment of Partial Seizures

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of tiagabine (TGB), a new antiepileptic drug (AED), as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: This response-dependent study used an open-label screening phase (in which patients were titrated to their optimal TGB dose, < or =64 mg/day) followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase. Initial eligibility criteria included (a) seizures inadequately controlled by existing AEDs, and (b) six or more partial seizures during an 8-week baseline period. Patients showing benefit from TGB (> or =25% reduction in total seizure rate relative to baseline) were eligible for randomization into the double-blind phase, which comprised two 7-week assessment periods separated by a 3-week crossover period. RESULTS: Forty-four (50%) of the 88 enrolled patients entered the double-blind phase of the study during which there were significant reductions compared with placebo in all partial (p < 0.01), complex partial (p < 0.001), and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizure rates (p < 0.05). Thirty-three percent of patients experienced a reduction of > or =50% in the all partial seizure rate. Eight (22%) patients receiving TGB during the double-blind phase reported adverse events, of which dizziness and incoordination were the most frequent. Three patients withdrew from treatment during the double-blind phase because of adverse events; two during treatment with TGB and one during treatment with placebo. TGB did not affect plasma concentrations of other coadministered AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: TGB was significantly better than placebo in terms of seizure rate reduction and was generally well-tolerated in patients with difficult to control seizures.     

The New Antiepileptic Drugs: A Systematic Review of Their Efficacy and Tolerability

: Purpose: Gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS) are all in use as “add-on” treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. There have been no comparative randomized controlled trials allowing an evidence-based choice between these drugs. We report a series of meta-analyses of randomized placebo-controlled add-on trials in which these drugs have been tested in patients with partial epilepsy. This work provides an estimate of each drug's efficacy and tolerability compared with placebo. These estimates are compared across drugs to give broad estimates of comparative efficacy and tolerability. Methods: Trial reports were found by searching Medline, by searching through journals by hand, and by contacting the pharmaceutical industry. The outcomes chosen were the proportion of patients who (a) have a 350% reduction in seizure frequency (50% responders); (b) withdrew from the study (any reason); or (c) reported the following side effects: ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, or somnolence. Overall odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIS; 50% responders) or 99% CIS; side effects) were calculated. Results: Twenty-nine trials were included, representing 4,091 randomized patients. The ORs for 50% response (95% CI) were GBP, 2.29 (1.53–3.43); LTG, 2.32 (1.47–3.68); TGB, 3.03 (2.01–4.58); TPM, 4.07 (2.87–5.78); VGB, 3.67 (2.44–5.51); and ZNS, 2.7 (1.36–4.47). ORs for discontinuation were GBP, 1.36 (0.75–2.49); LTG, 1.19 (0.79–1.79); TGB, 1.81 (1.21–2.70); TPM, 2.56 (1.64–4.00); VGB, 2.58 (126–5.27); and ZNS, 4.23 (1.71–10.49). Conclusions: We have clear evidence that each of these drugs is better than placebo at preventing seizures. When results are compared across drugs, the confidence intervals overlap, and we have no conclusive evidence of differences in efficacy or tolerability. Despite this, the agent that appears most effective may be twice as effective as the agent that appears least effective, and the agent that appears most likely to cause discontinuation may be 4 times more likely to do so than the treatment that appears least likely to do so. Comparative randomized studies are needed further to evaluate these drugs.     

Comparison of the cognitive effects of tiagabine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in newly diagnosed adult patients with partial epilepsy: pooled analysis of two long-term, randomized, follow-up studies

PURPOSE: Patients with epilepsy are at greater risk for cognitive impairment than are age- and education-matched controls. Cognitive decline is a significant adverse event associated with many first-generation anticonvulsant drugs (AEDs); however, the past decade has seen the introduction of several new AEDs with more-favorable cognitive profiles. Tiagabine (TGB) is indicated as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures. The cognitive effects of TGB and carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy were evaluated in adult epilepsy patients with partial seizures. METHODS: This analysis pooled data from two randomized studies with similar populations, dosing, and cognitive assessments. TGB was titrated to 20-30 mg/day and CBZ to 400-800 mg/day over a 6-week period. A control or no-drug group of untreated patients with a single epileptic seizure was included for comparison. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 105 epilepsy patients enrolled, 79 completed the 52 weeks of monotherapy (TGB, 74%; CBZ, 77%). Altogether, 19 untreated patients composed the no-drug group. During the 52-week follow-up, only one statistically significant difference was found between the treatment groups and the no-drug group [verbal fluency task: F(2, 92) = 3.16; p = 0.047]. On further analysis, it was determined that this statistical difference was solely based on the patients receiving CBZ performing worse than the control group (p = 0.048). Statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) were found on six (26%) of 23 variables with TGB and CBZ, as well as the no-drug group, although the variables differed between the groups. Significant worsening in the test scores was not seen in any of the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this 52-week, follow-up study show that successful TGB monotherapy with 20-30 mg/day has a cognitive profile similar to that of successful long-term CBZ monotherapy with 400-800 mg/day in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy and to that of untreated patients with a single seizure. We observed no significant decline in cognitive scores associated with TGB monotherapy.     

Tiagabine in Clinical Practice

Summary: Among the newly introduced antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), tiagabine (TGB) stands out as a compound with a well-understood and documented mechanism of action. It is a lipophilic derivative of nipecotic acid that blocks γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) reuptake by inhibition of the GAT-1 transportation system, and that has no other significant pharmacodynamic effect. The relationship between intake and blood levels is linear. Usual daily maintenance doses range from 20 to 50 mg. It is completely absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, and its half-life is ∼7–9 h. TGB is sensitive to enzyme induction: when coprescribed with enzyme-inducing AEDs, its half-life is shortened to 2–3 h, whereas the daily dosage has to be increased into the upper range. It should be given 3 times per day. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, add-on studies conducted in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsies have demonstrated its efficacy and overall safety. The clinical benefits appear to persist over time. Data on its use in monotherapy are scanty. The efficacy and tolerability of TGB in the pediatric age still remain to be investigated adequately. In daily practice, TGB appears to be a safe drug, but mild to moderate side effects are frequently seen, especially during titration: these include dizziness and fatigue, and are clearly abated when the drug is absorbed during meals. Titration should be especially slow, no faster than 5 mg weekly. Clinicians also should beware of the possible occurrence of confusion, which may be misdiagnosed as absence status, a short-lasting, quickly reversible central nervous system–related side effect that appears to be correlated with the peak plasma concentrations of TGB. Particularly beneficial indications for TGB and/or AED associations including TGB have not been pointed out, but there is a hint that it works best in temporal lobe epilepsies.     

Review of treatment options for refractory epilepsy: new medications and vagal nerve stimulation.

PURPOSE: the choices available for patients whose partial seizures are poorly controlled include seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) or vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) as add-on therapy. Comparisons are needed to help physicians and patients select among the options for treatment. METHODS: we compared efficacy and adverse events of new treatments from controlled clinical trials of patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. Response rates (> or =50% decrease in partial seizures) at doses recommended in product labeling for adjunct therapy were tabulated for overall success (placebo response rate subtracted from AED response rate). Adverse events listed in product labeling were tabulated as complaint rates (placebo events subtracted from AED events). VNS trials used low dose stimulation as a pseudo-placebo. RESULTS: overall success rates fell into two general groups with ranges of 12-20% for gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), zonisamide and 27-29% for levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate (TPM). Summary Complaint Scores also fell into two general groups with ranges of -27 to -82 for GBP, levetiracetam, TGB, zonisamide and -113 to -205 for LTG, oxcarbazepine and TPM. VNS scores were in the lower or higher success and summary complaint categories depending on whether scores from the pseudo-placebo group were subtracted from the high dose group. CONCLUSIONS: these data allow comparisons among AEDs and VNS using similar data from standard types of clinical trials.     

Tiagabine: efficacy and safety in partial seizures – current status

Tiagabine hydrochloride (TGB) is a selective gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) reuptake inhibitor. TGB is effective as an add-on medication in adults and children 12 years and older in the treatment of partial seizures. Results of nonrandomized add-on trials with TGB show treatment success with seizure reduction of at least 50% in 33% to 46% of patients. In newly diagnosed patients with partial epilepsy, TGB monotherapy was as effective as carbamazepine. Comedication with TGB elevates the risk of nonconvulsive status (7.8% vs 2.7% without TGB). The most common side effects include dizziness/lightheadedness, asthenia/lack of energy and somnolence. TGB has no negative effects on cognition; it does not increase the risk of fractures or rash. TGB may interfere with color perception. TGB presents an intermediate risk for depression in patients with epilepsy (approximately 4%). Regarding the risk of overdose, 96–680 mg TGB (mean 224 mg) caused seizures or coma. TGB is an antiepileptic drug exhibiting a specific anticonvulsive mechanism of action, the efficacy of which is relatively low when used in comedication. Critical side effects, such as the induction of nonconvulsive status epilepticus, further limit its use.     

Utility of the Lethargic (lh/lh) Mouse Model of Absence Seizures in Predicting the Effects of Lamotrigine,Vigabatrin, Tiagabine,Gabapentin, and Topiramate Against Human Absence Seizures

Summary: Purpose: Traditional methods of preclinical screening have predicted the effects of a putative antiepi-leptic drug (AED) against human absence seizures by testing its efficacy against clonic seizures in the high-dose pen-tylenetetrazole (PTZ) model. This high-dose PTZ model correctly predicted the efficacy of ethosuximide (ESM), benzodiazepines, and valproate (VPA) and the lack of efficacy of phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ). However, the high-dose PTZ model erred in predictions for (a) phenobarbital (PB) (PTZ: efficacy; human: noneffi-cacy); (b) lamotrigine (LTG) (PTZ nonefficacy; human: efficacy); (c) vigabatrin (VGB) (PTZ: nonefficacy; human: proabsence effect); and (d) tiagabine (TGB) (PTZ efficacy; human: possibleproabsence). It also appears to have erred in predictions for gabapentin (GBP) (PTZ efficacy) and topiramate (TPM) (PTZ: efficacy). Because the lh/lh genetic model of absence seizures correctly predicted effects of ESM, clonazepam, VPA, PHT, CBZ, and PB against human absence seizures, we performed this study to test the predictive utility of the lWZh model for LTG, VGB, TGB, GBP, and TPM. Methods: Bipolar recording electrodes were implanted bilaterally into frontal neocortex of 8–week-old male lWZh mice. With the exception of VGB, vehicle or drugs were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) on alternating days, and an EEG was used to record effects on seizure frequency. With VGB, vehicle was administered i.p. on day 1, and gradually increasing doses of VGB were administered on successive days. Drug and vehicle effects were compared in corresponding lfi-min epochs of the 150–min period after administration. Results: LTG (4.8–144 μmol/kg) significantly (p < 0.04) reduced seizure frequency (by 6.5%) compared with vehicle. In contrast, VGB (0.35–11 mmol/kg) and TGB (0.27–27 μmol/kg) significantly increased seizure frequency (300– 700%) and seizure duration (1,700–1,800%; p ≤ 0.001). GBP (18μmol/kg to 1.8 mmol/kg) and TPM (8.9–29.5 pmol/kg) had no significant effect on seizure frequency. Conclusions: In contrast to the high-dose PTZ model, the lh/lh model correctly predicted the antiabsence effect of LTG, the possible proabsence effects of VGB and TGB, and the lack of effect of GBP and TPM. The lWlh model appears to be superior to the high-dose PTZ model in predicting efficacy of putative AEDs against human absence seizures.     

Antiepileptic Effects of Tiagabine, a Selective GABA Uptake Inhibitor, in the Rat Kindling Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: We determined the antiepileptic profile of tiagabine (TGB), a selective γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) uptake inhibitor, in the rat kindling model of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).
Methods : The anticonvulsant and adverse effects of TGB were examined in amygdala- or hippocampal-kindled rats and compared with those of other GABA uptake inhibitors (SKF89976A and NNC-7 1 1) and conventional antiepileptic drugs [AEDs: valproate (VPA) and carbamazepine (CBZ)]. In addition, the antiepileptogenic effects of TGB on amygdala kindling development were examined.
Results : TGB (2.5–40 mgkg intraperitoneally, i.p.) had potent and dose-dependent anticonvulsant effects on both amygdala-and hippocampal-kindled seizures. The order of anticonvulsant potency of the three GABA uptake inhibitors tested was: NNC-711 > TGB > SKF-89976A and paralleled the in vitro GABA uptake efficacy. In addition, daily treatment with TGB 10 mgkg for 10 days significantly retarded kindling development. Although adverse effects of TGB on motor systems were significantly less than those of VPA and CBZ, high toxic doses of TGB often caused EEG paroxysm and myoclonus.
Conclusions : Our results indicate the clinical usefulness of TGB for treatment of drug-resistant TLE.     

Tiagabine versus phenytoin and carbamazepine as add-on therapies: effects on abilities, adjustment, and mood

The effects of tiagabine (TGB) on abilities and on adjustment and mood are as yet incompletely understood. These effects were compared with those of phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ) in an add-on study. Patients included in the analysis were adults with uncontrolled partial seizures who at study entry were on CBZ alone (n=153) or on PHT alone (n=124). Of the patients receiving CBZ, 82 were randomized to add-on TGB and 71 were randomized to add-on PHT during the double-blind period. Of the patients receiving PHT, 58 were randomized to add-on TGB and 66 were randomized to add-on CBZ. Eight tests of mental abilities and three of mood and adjustment were given prior to assignment of add-on treatment and after up to 16 weeks of add-on treatment. For the baseline CBZ group, analyses were done to search for differential changes from baseline in the test scores of the add-on TGB and add-on PHT groups, and for the baseline PHT group in the add-on TGB and add-on CBZ groups. In the baseline CBZ group, no differences in test scores were found between PHT and TGB. In the baseline PHT group for the area of abilities, patients treated with TGB had improved verbal fluency, as well as quicker responses on a test of perceptual/motor speed compared with patients treated with CBZ. For the baseline PHT group in the area of adjustment and mood, patients treated with TGB reported less positive mood and more financial concerns compared to patients treated with CBZ. Overall, add-on TGB showed few or no differences in comparison with add-on CBZ and add-on PHT.     

Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Tiagabine

Summary: Purpose: We wished to determine the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drug tiagabine (TGB).
Methods: We assessed TGB pharmacokinetics and tolerability in 25 subjects with various degrees of renal function (based on creatinine clearance, n = 4–6 per group) from healthy (group I) to requiring hemodialysis (group V) in a single and multiple dose (every 12h), one-period (groups I-IV) or a single dose, two-period (group V) study (4-mg oral doses of TGB · HCl). Blood samples were collected after the first dose (both periods for group V) and after the last dose on day 5 (groups I-IV). TGB plasma concentrations and plasma protein binding were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultrafiltration, respectively.
Results: TGB was well tolerated by all study subjects. The pharmacokinetics of TGB were similar in all subjects; no pharmacokinetic parameter (based on either total or unbound concentrations) was statistically correlated with creatinine clearance. For total TGB in plasma, single-dose mean values of the maximum plasma concentration, clearance, and half-life (t1/2) ranged from 52 to 108 ng/ml, from 7.14 to 11.02 I/h, and from 6.4 to 8.4 h, respectively.
Conclusions: TGB pharmacokinetics and tolerability were independent of renal function; therefore, dosage adjustment is unnecessary for epilepsy patients with renal impairment.     

Aggravation of partial seizures by antiepileptic drugs: is there evidence from clinical trials?

OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical trials for evidence that antiepileptic drugs (AED) aggravate partial seizures. To determine if the methodology used to examine drug efficacy can also be used to examine seizure aggravation. BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that AED aggravate epilepsy in some patients. However, there is little published objective or quantitative evidence. Most reports concern generalized epilepsies. METHODS: Pharmaceutical companies responsible for the development of five of the new AED were asked to provide data concerning seizure increases during randomized placebo-controlled, add-on clinical trials in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. Seizure frequency in individual patients taking drug or placebo was compared with the baseline pretreatment seizure frequency. The counterpart of the 50% reduction used in efficacy analyses is a 100% increase, because both represent a twofold change. A dose-response relationship was also explored. RESULTS: More than 40% of subjects in clinical trials of tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), and levetiracetam (LEV) experienced an increase in seizures while taking a placebo. Seizure increases were no more likely to occur when taking any of the three drugs than taking placebo. A doubling or more of seizure frequency was less likely to occur with TPM or LEV than with placebo but more likely with TGB. However, for TGB, this did not reach significance. There was some evidence for a dose-response effect with TGB but a negative effect with TPM (aggravation less likely with increasing dose). Data on gabapentin and lamotrigine were not provided. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with partial seizures experience an increase in seizures when a new AED is added to their therapy. However, it occurs no more frequently when taking drug than placebo. It probably represents the spontaneous fluctuation of seizure frequency. When a patient who has started a new AED deteriorates, this is not necessarily a drug effect.     

Elderly Patients with Epilepsy: Specific Requirements

Summary: Epilepsy is the third most common neurologic disorder in the elderly and, combined with the progressive aging of the population, this high incidence will lead to an increasing number of elderly patients who require epilepsy care. Treatment of epilepsy in elderly patients is often complicated by the physiologic changes that occur in old age, e.g., reduced absorption, slower metabolism, and deterioration of liver and renal function. Another consideration is that elderly patients are most likely to be suffering from other diseases, necessitating multiple therapies. The potential for drug interactions is therefore high. Because of these factors, traditional antiepileptic drug (AED) therapies are associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects in elderly patients than in younger patients. Tiagabine (TGB) is one of a family of new AEDs recently developed. The newer AEDs tend to have a comparable antiepileptic efficacy and a lower potential for toxicity compared with the traditional AEDs. Clinical studies have shown that age appears to have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of TGB and that there is little difference in the incidence of adverse events between elderly and young patients. Although clinical experience with TGB in the elderly is still limited, TGB shows promise for treatment of epilepsy in the elderly population.     

Effects of Tiagabine Monotherapy on Abilities, Adjustment, and Mood

Summary: Purpose: We evaluated the dose-related impacts of tiagabine (TGB) on cognition and mood in a monotherapy study.
Methods: Patients were 123 adults with uncontrolled partial seizures, each treated with a single currently available antiepileptic drug (AED) for management of clinical epilepsy. They completed a battery of neuropsychological tests during an 8 week prospective baseline period and once again at the end of the 12-week fixed-dose period (or earlier if they dropped out of the study). Sixty-six patients were randomized to 6 mg/day TGB and 57 were randomized to 36 mg/day TGB.
Results: Few changes in either abilities or adjustment and mood were noted when all patients were considered as a single group. However, analysis of both dose and attainment of TGB monotherapy showed that patients receiving TGB monotherapy did best, improving particularly in the areas of adjustment and mood with low-dose TGB and in the area of abilities with high-dose TGB. Patients who did not attain monotherapy showed no change except that the high-dose group did not perform as well on measures of mood and adjustment. Baseline AED and changes in seizure control did not affect the results.
Conclusions: Patients attainment of TGB monotherapy was associated with their achievement of positive changes of varying degree on psychological tests. Failure to attain TGB monotherapy was associated with no changes on the tests except in patients receiving high-dose TGB where it appeared that some alterations in mood might have been avoided if a slower titration schedule had been used.