Comparison of an automatic versus a semiautomatic mode for gray-scale adaptation for digital chest radiography

PURPOSE: To compare image quality of digital chest radiographs using 2 modes of gradation adjustment. METHODS: We compared image quality and visualization of anatomic landmarks of 50 chest radiographs after digital processing using a semiautomatic mode with a fixed gamma of 2.6 and an automatic mode with individual gamma adaptation. RESULTS: The mean gamma was significantly higher (P < 0.001) with the automatic mode (3.0 vs. 2.6, respectively). Patient constitution had no impact on the automatically adapted gamma for PA but showed a significant correlation (P < 0.001) for lateral images. For PA, there was a preference (P < 0.016) of the semiautomatic mode in heavier patients whereas no difference was seen in slim patients. For the lateral projection, there was a general preference (P = 0.001) of the automatic mode. CONCLUSION: For PA radiographs, the semiautomatic mode provides superior results for heavier patients without compromising the quality in slim patients. For lateral radiographs, the automatic mode provides generally superior results.     

Newly developed monitor for IVR: liquid crystal display (LCD) replaced with cathode ray tube (CRT)

For physicians who monitor images during interventional radiology (VR), we have built and been using a system that employs a liquid crystal display (LCD) instead of the conventional cathode ray tube (CRT). The system incorporates a ceiling-suspension-type monitor (three-display monitor) with an LCD on each of the three displays for the head and abdominal regions and another ceiling-suspension-type monitor (5-display monitor) with an LCD on each display for the cardiac region. As these monitors are made to be thin and light in weight, they can be placed in a high position in the room, thereby saving space and allowing for more effective use of space in the X-ray room. The system has also improved the efficiency of operators in the IVR room. The three-display folding mechanism allows the displays to be viewed from multiple directions, thereby improving the environment so that the performance of IVR can be observed.     

The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs

Purpose To access the influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on the detectability of nodular lesions depicted on chest radiographs by comparing them with a high-resolution cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor. Material and methods Ten radiologists interpreted 247 soft-copy images on LCD monitors with pixel arrays of 1,024×1,280, 1,200×1,600, 1,536×2,048 and 2,048×2,560, and a CRT monitor with a pixel array of 2,048×2,560, and were asked to indicate their individual confidence levels regarding the presence of a nodule. These images were chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule from the “Standard Digital Image Database” created by the Japanese Society of Radiological Technology. The luminance distributions of all monitors were adjusted to the same, and the ambient illumination was 200 lux. Observer performance was analyzed in terms of the receiver-operating characteristics. Results No significant statistical differences in nodule detection performance were found among the four LCD monitors and the CRT monitor. Conclusion The nodule detection performance on the LCD monitors with a spatial resolution higher than a matrix size of 1,024×1,280 was found to be equivalent to that on the high-resolution CRT monitor.     

Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance

PURPOSE: To compare observer performance in the detection of abnormalities on 1,760 x 2,140 matrix (2K) and 3,520 x 4,280 matrix (4K) digital storage phosphor chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty patients who underwent dedicated computed tomography (CT) of the thorax were prospectively recruited into the study. Posteroanterior and lateral computed radiographs of the chest were acquired in each patient and printed in 2K and 4K formats. Six radiologists independently analyzed the hard-copy images and scored the presence of parenchymal (opacities 2 cm, and subtle interstitial), mediastinal, and pleural abnormalities on a five-point confidence scale. With CT as the reference standard, observer performance tests were carried out by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of averaged observer performance showed 2K and 4K images were equally effective in detection of all three groups of abnormalities. In the detection of the three subtypes of parenchymal abnormalities, there were no significant differences in averaged performance between the 2K and 4K formats (area below ROC curve [A(z)] values: opacities 2 cm, 0.86 +/-.025 and 0.85 +/- 0.030; subtle interstitial abnormalities, 0.73 +/- 0.041 and 0.72 +/- 0.041). Averaged performance in detection of mediastinal and pleural abnormalities was equivalent (A(z) values: mediastinal, 0.70 +/- 0.046 and 0.73 +/- 0.033; pleural, 0.85 +/- 0.032 and 0.86 +/- 0.033). CONCLUSION: Observer performance in detection of parenchymal, mediastinal, and pleural abnormalities was not significantly different on 2K and 4K storage phosphor chest radiographs.     

双角度和单角度体层摄影与全数字化乳腺摄影的比较:高分辨率X线成像的观察研究

目的对于二维全数字化乳腺摄影与双角度(侧位和头尾位)和单角度(侧斜位)体层摄影进行诊断精确性的比较,该观察研究涉及两个研究所。材料与方法本研究获得伦理委员会批准,所有受试的女性均签订知情同意书。2008年     

Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: an observer performance study

Interpretations of 122 musculoskeletal radiographs were compared with interpretations of their digital counterparts at a resolution of 1,024 X 840 X 12 bits. Images were evaluated by four readers and included subtle and nonsubtle abnormalities and normal findings. Joint receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis results were averaged over all readers and demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the two imaging methods. High interobserver variability limited identifiable differences. Review of cases with subtle findings on the digital system at a resolution of 2,048 X 1,680 X 12 bits (2.5 line pairs per millimeter) revealed adequate visualization of the abnormality in every case. It is concluded that a resolution of 1,024 X 840 X 12 bits is adequate for the interpretation of many musculoskeletal abnormalities but that a resolution of 2,048 X 1,680 X 12 bits is needed for visualization of some subtle abnormalities.     

Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study

The purpose of the study was to compare observer performance in the detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer among hard-copy reading and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. For the microcalcification detection test, we prepared 100 mammograms: 40 surgically verified cancer cases and 60 normal cases. For the mass detection test, we prepared 100 mammograms: 50 cancer cases and 50 normal cases. After six readers assessed both microcalcifications and masses set for each modality, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. The average A_zs for mass detection using a hard copy and 3M and 5M LCD monitors were 0.923, 0.927 and 0.920, respectively; there were no significant differences. The average A_z for microcalcification detection using hard copy, 3M and 5M LCD monitors was 0.977, 0.954 and 0.972, respectively. There were no significant differences, but the P-values between the hard copy and 3M LCD monitor and that between the 3M and 5M LCD monitor were 0.08 and 0.09, respectively. In conclusion, the observer performances for detecting masses of breast cancers were comparable among the hard copy and two LCD monitors; however, soft-copy reading with a 3M LCD monitor showed slightly lower observer performance for detecting microcalcifications of breast cancers than hard-copy or 5M LCD monitor reading.     

Digital selenium radiography: anti-scatter grid for chest radiography in a clinical study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an additional stationary anti-scatter grid in digital selenium radiography (DSR) compared with images acquired with only an air gap. Chest radiographs were obtained with DSR in 100 patients with and without an anti-scatter grid. Four observers scored 12 anatomical landmarks, catheters and wire cerclages for their visualization in both subsets of images. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test. Anatomical landmarks, catheters and wire cerclages were statistically better visualized in regions of high attenuation when the images were performed with an anti-scatter grid. No statistically significant difference was noted for peripheral regions, nor for sex and weight of the patient between the two modalities. Therefore, an anti-scatter grid is not recommended for chest radiography as it increases the radiation exposure of patients without having a significant impact on visualization for all regions of the chest.     

Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom

The purpose of the study was to compare the image quality for one conventional and four digital chest radiography techniques. Three storage phosphor systems, one selenium drum system, and one film-screen system were compared using a modified receiver-operating-characteristics method. Simulated pathology was randomly positioned over the parenchymal regions and the mediastinum of an anthropomorphic phantom. Eight observers (four chest radiologists, one specialist in general radiology, one hospital physicist, and two radiographers) evaluated 60 images for each technique. The selenium drum system (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) rated best for the detection of parenchymal nodules. Together with the storage phosphor system of generation IIIN (Philips/Fuji), the selenium drum system also rated best for detection of thin linear structures. The storage phosphor system of generation V (Fuji) rated best for the detection of mediastinal nodules. The first generation of the storage phosphor system from Agfa (Mortsel, Belgium) rated worst for the detection of parenchymal nodules and thin linear structures. These differences were significant (p < 0.0001). Averaging the results for all test objects, the selenium drum system and the storage phosphor system of generation V were significantly better than the other systems tested. The film/screen system performed significantly better than the first-generation storage phosphor system from Agfa, equal to the generation IIIN storage phosphor system (Philips/Fuji) and significantly worse than the selenium drum system (Philips) and the generation-V storage phosphor system (Fuji). The conclusion is therefore that the image quality of selenium-based digital technique and of the more recent generations of storage phosphor systems is superior to both conventional technique and storage phosphor systems using image plates of older types. Received: 11 September 1997; Revised: 25 June 1998; Accepted: 18 February 1999     

Modified Chrispin-Norman chest radiography score for cystic fibrosis: observer agreement and correlation with lung function

Objective  

To test observer agreement and two strategies for possible improvement (consensus meeting and reference images) for the modified Chrispin-Norman score for children with cystic fibrosis (CF).     

改良的克里斯宾-诺曼胸片评分用于囊性纤维化:观察者之间的一致性及与肺功能相关性

目的检测在儿童囊性纤维化(CF)中应用改良的克里斯宾-诺曼评分法在观察者间的一致性和两种可能提高此方法的评分策略(共识会议和参考影像)。方法在共识会     

Pulmonary nodule detection of chest phantom with CRT images--comparison with conventional radiography (film-screen system) and FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography) hardcopy

Conventional Radiography, Fuji Computed Radiography (FCR) hardcopy and CRT images were evaluated about the detectability of pulmonary nodule using the chest phantom. Conventional and digitized chest radiographs (FCR) were used, including 45 normal cases and 45 abnormal cases with a variety pulmonary nodule. Observer performance tests were conducted to compare the effects on diagnostic accuracy of Conventional Radiography, FCR hardcopy and CRT images, and diagnostic accuracy was determined with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. ROC study was performed in which six radiologists were asked to locate nodule on three modalities. Two CRT monitors were used to observed CRT images. The left side CRT monitor was divided into two parts and displayed two images which were done as same image processing as FCR hardcopy. The right side CRT monitor was divided into four parts and displayed four images as a subsidiary diagnosis. The upper two images were displayed to diagnose the nodule of cardiac and diaphragmatic area, and lower two images were displayed to diagnose the nodule of the lung field. The results were summarized as follows: 1) CRT images were superior in sensitivity (78.5%) to the others, and FCR hardcopys were superior in specificity (95.9%). 2) About the accuracy of 5 and 8 mm in diameter nodule detection, there was no significant difference among three modalities. 3) Diagnostic accuracy of 3 mm in diameter nodule detection was significantly greater with digitized radiographs (FCR 44.4%, CRT images 54.4%) than with conventional radiograph (17.7%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors

The purpose of this study is to compare observer performance for detection of abnormalities on chest radiographs with 5-megapixel resolution liquid-crystal displays (LCD) and 5-megapixel resolution cathode-ray tube (CRT) monitors under bright and subdued ambient light conditions. Six radiologists reviewed a total of 254 digital chest radiographs under four different conditions with a combination of two types of monitors (a 5-megapixel resolution LCD and a 5-megapixel resolution CRT monitor) and with two types of ambient light (460 and 50 lux). The abnormalities analyzed were nodules, pneumothorax and interstitial lung disease. For each reader, the detection performance using 5-megapixel LCD and 5-megapixel CRT monitors under bright and subdued ambient light conditions were compared using multi-case and multi-modality ROC analysis. For each type of ambient light, the average detection performance with the two types of monitors was also compared. For each reader, the observer performance of 5-megapixel LCD and 5-megapixel CRT monitors, under both bright and subdued ambient light conditions, showed no significant statistical differences for detecting nodules, pneumothorax and interstitial lung disease. In addition, there was no significant statistical difference in the average performance when the two monitor displays, under both bright and subdued ambient light conditions, were compared.     

The influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for the detection of interstitial lung markings on both storage phosphor and flat-panel-detector chest radiography

Purpose

To compare observer performance with a flat-panel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor and with a high-resolution gray-scale cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor in the detection of interstitial lung markings using a silicon flat-panel-detector direct radiography (DR) and storage phosphor computed radiography (CR) in a clinical setting.

Materials and methods

We displayed 39 sets of posteroanterior chest radiographs from the patients who were suspected of interstitial lung disease. Each sets consisted of DR, CR and thin-section CT as the reference standard. Image identities were masked, randomly sorted, and displayed on both five mega pixel (2048 × 2560 × 8 bits) LCD and CRT monitors. Ten radiologists independently rated their confidence in detection for the presence of linear opacities in the four fields of the lungs; right upper, left upper, right lower, and left lower quadrant. Performance of a total 6240 (39 sets × 2 detector systems × 2 monitor system × 4 fields × 10 observers) observations was analyzed by multi-reader multi-case receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Differences between monitor systems in combinations of detector systems were compared using ANOVA and paired-samples t-test.

Results

Area under curves (AUC) for the presence of linear opacities measured by ROC analysis was higher on the LCDs than CRTs without statistical significance (p = 0.082). AUC was significantly higher on the DR systems than CR systems (p = 0.006). AUC was significantly higher on the LCDs than CRTs for DR systems (p = 0.039) but not different for CR systems (p = 0.301).

Conclusion

In clinical conditions, performance of the LCD monitor appears to be better for detecting interstitial lung markings when interfaced with DR systems.     

Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases

Thirty-eight selected clinical radiographs were digitized and displayed on a 1,024-line monitor at pixel sizes of 1.6, 0.8, 0.4, and 0.2 mm. Eighteen experienced radiologists assessed the radiographs and digital images, which included 12 examples of abnormal solitary nodular density, ten examples of septal lines, and 16 controls, six of which showed diffuse lung abnormalities. For each level of spatial resolution and for film reading, observers gave their decision confidence on a sliding scale of probability. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated from these data. It was found that while spatial resolution requirements for solitary nodules were not critical for pixel sizes at or below 0.8 mm, the requirement for septal lines was likely to be 0.4 mm (1.25 line pairs/mm).     

Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a digital large-area silicon flat-panel detector with that of a conventional screen-film system in clinical chest imaging using abnormal findings documented by CT as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients (46 men and 34 women; age range,18-91 years; mean age, 63 years) who underwent CT of the chest were examined with the new digital radiography system, which is based on a 43 x 43 cm silicon flat-panel detector, and with a conventional screen-film system, which is used routinely in clinical practice. Posteroanterior and lateral radiographs were obtained. Four radiologists analyzed the digital and conventional images separately for chest abnormalities and rated the images using a five-level scale of confidence; CT was used as the reference standard. Diagnostic value was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves for each abnormality. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the digital and that of the conventional radiography method for almost all investigated criteria. The only exception was mediastinal abnormalities, for which the digital method provided better results than the conventional method (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION. The diagnostic performance of the new large-area silicon flat-panel detector is equivalent or superior to that of the conventional screen-film system for clinical chest imaging and can replace conventional radiography systems. This new technology offers transmission and storage possibilities inherent to digital radiology that would facilitate daily practice and reduce the initial high costs in the long-term.