Unusually favorable outcome of 6 consecutive patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma treated with repeated doses of intraperitoneal paclitaxel. A case series

BackgroundDiffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a disease in transition. Two decades ago this cancer had a median survival of 1 year. Recent reports in selected patients show a 5-year survival of 70% and median survival not reached at 10 years.MethodsConsecutive patients with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of DMPM, epithelial type, were treated by a consistent treatment plan. Cytoreductive surgery using peritonectomy procedures was always the first intervention. In the operating theater after all resections were complete but prior to intestinal reconstruction, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using 2 cytotoxic agents was given. An intraperitoneal port was placed for normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC). Prospective data regarding pharmacokinetics, survival and adverse events were accumulated.ResultsSix consecutive patients were treated. Three to 6 one-week long cycles of normothermic intraperitoneal paclitaxel were administered through an intraperitoneal port. No systemic chemotherapy was given. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on 5 patients. Four patients are free of disease at 8, 13, 18, and 19 years and two patients died of disease 15 years after definitive treatment. Three of 6 patients had a grade III/IV adverse event related to intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration through a port.ConclusionsThe small number of patients treated with repeated doses of intraperitoneal paclitaxel cause these data to be interpreted with caution. However, the long-term benefit and favorable pharmacology of these patients suggests the need for further study. Adverse events from this intraperitoneal port were recorded in half of the patients.     

Postoperative adverse events and long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Background

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is fatal without special combined cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC). This study was designed to identify factors that may increase the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality from combined CRS and IPC interventions for PC. Survival based on primary tumour type and extent of surgery is reported.

Methods

Between May 1991 and November 2004, 123 patients were treated with CRS and IPC for PC. Based on the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for grade 3 and 4, data on 30 days postoperative morbidity and 90 days mortality were analysed.

Results

Grade 3–4 adverse events were observed in 51 patients (41%) and were associated with stoma formation, duration of surgery, peroperative blood loss and peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Excision, or electrocautery evaporation, of tumour from small bowel surface was correlated to bowel morbidity. Five patients had treatment-related mortality (4%) within 90 days. Survival was associated with macroscopic radical surgery, prior surgical score, PCI and primary tumour type.

Conclusions

CRS and IPC for PC are associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, in light of the potential benefit indicated by long-term survival, the adverse event from this treatment is considered acceptable.     

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal mesothelioma

Aims

Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare disease and traditionally has been associated with a gloomy prognosis. The present study aimed to report the outcomes following surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy in selected patients with peritoneal mesothelioma.

Methods

Clinicopathological features, operative procedures, early outcomes and survival were analysed for 17 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peritoneal mesothelioma between 1998 and 2007. Seventeen consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peritoneal mesothelioma between 1998 and 2007 were analysed for clinicopathological features, operative procedures, early outcomes and survival.

Results

Seventeen patients underwent 18 laparotomies. Most presented with abdominal distension (71%) and abdominal pain or discomfort (53%). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 8 patients, major debulking in 8, and 1 patient had an exploratory laparotomy only due to extensive disease. One patient died on day 30 postoperatively due to a chest infection and pulmonary embolism. The median survival for 8 patients who underwent complete cytoreduction was 3.7 years (range, 0.7–6.9), whereas that for 8 patients with palliative debulking was 1.0 years year (range, 0.3–5.7). Among the 12 patients who had significant ascites as a presenting symptom, 10 reported good palliation of ascites.

Conclusions

Cytoreductive surgery combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy appears to be the optimal treatment for selected patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. Increased familiarity with this condition's presentation and natural history, and knowledge of available treatment options, will hopefully facilitate treatment of these patients and expedite speedy referral to appropriate treatment centres.     

Two-stage operative cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: Operative morbidity and mortality in phase I and II trials

Aims

The standard of care for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma involves operative cytoreduction and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Most centers favor aggressive operative cytoreduction, accepting high morbidity and mortality. In our trials, patients underwent less extensive cytoreduction followed by prolonged intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Patients underwent a second cytoreduction with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. We hypothesized this would result in lower operative morbidity and mortality with similar survival.

Methods

Hospital records, discharge summaries, microbiology, radiography, and office records were retrospectively reviewed to supplement a prospective database. 30-day morbidity and mortality were categorized, and classified according to the Clavien methodology.

Results

47 first and 39 second operations were performed with 13% and 26% morbidity, respectively. Mortality was 2%. Infections comprised 59% of the morbidity. Inclusive of both operations, formal peritonectomy was performed in 16% of patients, resection of isolated lesions in less than half, and only 19% had a visceral organs other than the spleen resected. At the completion of the protocol, only 3% of patients had visible intraperitoneal disease. The mean total length of stay for both operations combined was 16 ± 23 days. Overall median survival was 54.9 months, and median survival for the epithelioid subtype was 70.2 months.

Conclusions

A two-stage cytoreduction with intraperitoneal chemotherapy offers median survival comparable to one-stage protocols, with relatively low morbidity, mortality, visceral resections and length of stay despite two operations. This series supports that our protocol is a feasible and safe approach.     

Quality of life in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Background

An increasing number of patients are presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis and more centers are performing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). While morbidity and mortality are shown to be acceptable, quality of life after surgery should be assessed.

Methods

63 patients who had CRS and HIPEC from 2001 to 2012 and who were still alive and on follow up were included. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 was administered to the patients.

Results

Median age was 53 years (14–71). 44% had ovarian primaries, 21% had appendicael primaries and 19% had colorectal primaries. Median follow-up was 1.08 years (0.06–9.8). The median time from surgery to the questionnaire was 1.3 years (0.24–10.18). There was no statistical difference in scores when comparing by age, gender, recurrence, gender, PCI score, presence of a complication and type of primary cancer. Scores were highest less than 6 months after surgery, dropped subsequently but rose again after 2 years. Our patients had better scores compared to a control group of outpatient cancer patients at our institution as well as the reference EORTC group.

Conclusions

In keeping with previous quality of life studies done for CRS and HIPEC patients, we have shown that our patients can achieve a good quality of life after CRS and HIPEC even with recurrent disease.     

先期化疗联合肿瘤细胞减灭术后腹腔热灌注化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的临床疗效分析

目的 探讨先期化疗联合肿瘤细胞减灭术后腹腔热灌注化疗治疗晚期卵巢癌的临床疗效.方法 将58例卵巢癌患者随机分为对照组和实验组.对照组采用常规肿瘤细胞减灭术联合术后腹腔热灌注化疗(TC/TP方案),实验组在对照组基础上于术前行新型辅助化疗,对比分析2组患者临床治疗效果.结果 实验组手术时间、术中出血量、腹水量以及术后感染率明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),但2组患者在住院时间上差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).实验组患者治疗疗程结束后外周血免疫相关指标因子CD3+ CD4+、CD3+ CD56+以及CD3+ CD4 +/CD3+ CD8+与对照组相比,上升趋势更明显,差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05).实验组治疗疗程结束后总有效率为72.4％,显著高于对照组(41.4％),具有统计学意义(P＜0.05);实验组与对照组在癌肿的复发率、死亡率以及1年生存率上差异不具统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 先期化疗联合肿瘤细胞减灭术后腹腔热灌注化疗对晚期卵巢癌的近期疗效显著,可有效改善患者免疫抑制现象.     

Strategies for the prevention and treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal cancer

Background. Peritoneal surface malignancy can result from full thickness invasion of gastrointestinal cancer through the bowel wall or from dissemination of cancer cells from the trauma of cancer surgery. In the past, this clinical situation was treated only with palliative intent. Methods. An aggressive approach to peritoneal surface malignancy involves peritonectomy procedures, perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy and knowledgeable patient selection. The clinical assessments necessary for valid clinical judgements include the cancer histopathology (invasive vs. expansive progression), the preoperative abdominal and pelvic CT, the peritoneal cancer index and the completeness of cytoreduction score. Proper patient selection is mandatory for optimizing the results of treatment. Results. In a series of phase II studies, appendiceal tumors with peritoneal seeding became the paradigm for success with an 85% long-term survival in selected patients. Carcinomatosis from colon cancer had an overall 5-year survival of 50% with selected patients. In all malignancies, early aggressive treatment of minimal peritoneal surface dissemination showed the greatest benefit. Conclusions. Oncologists must accept responsibility for knowledgeable management of peritoneal surface dissemination of cancer because a curative approach has been demonstrated in both phase II studies and phase III studies. All historical controls show 0% long-term survival. Surgical interventions combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in diseases where peritoneal surface spread occurs must be considered a treatment option.     

Pharmacokinetic changes induced by the volume of chemotherapy solution in patients treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal mitomycin C

Background: The rationale supporting the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy relates to a large local–regional effect and low systemic toxicity. While optimizing the use of this treatment strategy, little information regarding the effect of volume of chemotherapy solution is available. Objective: The goal of this study was to provide data regarding the effect of volume of chemotherapy solution on the pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Data by which to optimally adjust this parameter during intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatments were sought. Methods: Forty-eight patients with peritoneal surface malignancy were treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal mitomycin C chemotherapy after a complete cytoreduction to remove all visible evidence of mucinous tumor. The dose of mitomycin C was always 12.5 mg/m² in males and 10 mg/m² in females. The first 12 patients were treated with 6 l of 1.5% dextrose peritoneal dialysis solution. The next 14 patients were treated with 4 l of fluid and then ten patients were treated with 2 l. In the last 12 patients the volume of fluid was 1.5 l/m² . Blood, peritoneal fluid, and urine samples were obtained every 15 min for 90 min; additional blood and urine samples were obtained at 120 min. Mitomycin C concentrations, urine volumes, and final intraperitoneal fluid volume were obtained. Results: The intraperitoneal and the plasma concentrations were highest in the 2-l group, less in the 4-l group, and least in the 6-l group. All differences were statistically significant. Also, the percent of mitomycin C absorbed decreased significantly from 2, to 4, to 6 l of fluid. The area under the curve (AUC) ratio of intraperitoneal concentration times time to intravenous concentration times time was 27.01±4.92 for 2 l, 22.22±7.95 for 4 l, and 24.01±8.46 for 6 l. These differences were not statistically significant. If both the volume of chemotherapy solution and the total dose of mitomycin C were determined from the body surface area, the pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal mitomycin C were more consistent. Conclusions: In order to prescribe a uniform treatment for patients receiving hyperthermic intraperitoneal mitomycin C, the total dose of the drug and the total volume of chemotherapy solution should be determined from the body surface area. If the volume of chemotherapy solution is not based on patient body surface area, predictions regarding toxicity are less precise.     

Outcome differences between debulking surgery and cytoreductive surgery in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei

Background

The aim of this study was to compare debulking surgery and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) regarding efficacy and safety.

Patients and methods

Data were extracted from medical records and treatment outcomes were analyzed for all 152 patients with PMP who were scheduled for debulking surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) or CRS and IPC at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, between September 1993 and December 2008.

Results

One hundred and ten patients (73%) were treated with CRS and IPC and 40 (27%) with debulking surgery and IPC. In two patients (1%), surgery was defined as open and close. Patients with CRS and IPC had a 74% 5-year overall survival (OS) rate compared with 40% for those treated with debulking surgery (P < 0.001). Patients with no residual macroscopic tumour (R1 resection) had a better 5-year OS rate of 94% compared with 28% for patients with macroscopic residual tumour (R2) (P < 0.001). Grades II–IV adverse events were seen in 29% of debulked patients and in 47% of CRS/IPC patients (P = 0.053).

Conclusions

CRS and IPC seems more efficient than debulking surgery and IPC but with numerically higher morbidity. Therefore, if surgically possible, CRS should be the treatment of choice for PMP patients. However, debulking surgery may still be of benefit to selected patients for palliative purposes.     

Advances in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

Malignant mesothelioma is a highly aggressive neoplasm. The incidence of malignant mesothelioma is increasing worldwide. Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) represents one-fourth of all mesotheliomas. Association of asbestos exposure with DMPM has been observed, especially in males. A great majority of patients present with abdominal pain and distension, caused by accumulation of tumors and ascitic fluid. In the past, DMPM was considered a pre-terminal condition; therefore attracted little attention. Patients invariably died from their disease within a year. Recently, several prospective trials have demonstrated median survival of 40 to 90 months and 5-year survival of 30% to 60% after the combined treatment using cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This improvement in survival has prompted new searches into the medical science related to DMPM, a disease previously ignored as uninteresting. This review article focuses on the key advances in the epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, treatments and prognosis of DMPM that have occurred in the past decade.     

Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: state of the art and future developments

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) had long been regarded as a terminal disease, characterized by a very poor survival and worth treating with palliative therapy. A new strategy combining maximal surgery (cytoreductive surgery, CRS), with maximal regional chemotherapy (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC), has been proposed to treat PC, resulting in long-term survival rates in selected patients. The emerging trend is to view localised peritoneal carcinomatosis, in the absence of other metastases, as a regional metastatic disease that is amenable to locoregional therapy. In spite of the need for more high quality studies, many international experts now agree that the use of this new strategy is a gold standard for treating selected patients with PC with the intent of curing. The best results are achieved in patients with limited disease who have completed macroscopic tumor removal. To offer a comprehensive review, we summarized the present status and possible future progress of this treatment modality, in particular outlining its rationale, current practice and general outcome.     

Early recurrence in peritoneal metastasis of appendiceal neoplasm: Survival and prognostic factors

IntroductionEarly recurrence (ER) is defined as development of loco-regional peritoneal disease within 12-month of the initial CRS/PIC. Our aims were to identify overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and independent prognostic factors associated with ER in PM of appendiceal neoplasm.Materials and methodsA prospectively-maintained database for patients with appendiceal neoplasm undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) from year 1996–2018 was retrospectively analysed.Results208 female and 185 male patients were identified. With a median follow-up of 40-month, 40.2% of the patients developed ER. The median OS for ER was 24 months compared to late (LR) at 64 months. Median OS was not reached in non-recurrence (NR). 5-year survival for ER was less favourable compared to LR and NR (19.3%vs54.6%vs94%). No patients in ER group survived beyond 10-year. Independent negative predictors associated with ER on multivariate analysis were male patient (p = 0.013), blood transfusion of >8 units (p = 0.013), elevated preoperative CEA levels (>5 ng/ml; p = 0.002) and hard intraoperative tumour consistency (p < 0.001). Protective factor was a combination of CC1, hard tumour consistency and use of EPIC (p = 0.039). Independent prognostic factors that predicted recurrence of appendiceal PM were PCI >20 (p = 0.049), non-use of EPIC (p = 0.012), hard tumour consistency (p = 0.004) and use of previous chemotherapy (p = 0.023).ConclusionER following CRS and PIC of appendiceal PM is associated with reduced survival outcomes. Our data alludes to the importance of optimising the risk factors in order to delay loco-regional recurrence and improve long-term survival of these patients.     

Multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma: outcomes and patho-biological features in a multi-institutional series treated by cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)

Aim

This retrospective multi-institutional study addresses the role of surgical cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (MCPM). MCPM is an uncommon tumour with uncertain malignant potential and no current standard therapy. Additionally, poorly defined pathological and biological features of this disease were investigated.

Methods

Twelve patients with MCPM underwent 14 procedures of cytoreduction and HIPEC in two Italian referral centres. Nine patients had recurrent disease after previous debulking (one operation in six patients, two in two, four in one). Biological markers related to mesothelioma origin and clinical features were assessed by immunohistochemical studies.

Results

Median follow-up was 64 months (range 5–148). Optimal cytoreduction (residual tumour nodules ≤2.5 mm) was performed in all the procedures. One grade IV postoperative complication (NCI/CTCAE v.3.0) and no operative death occurred. All the patients are presently alive with no evidence of disease, including two patients who underwent the procedure twice, due to locoregional disease recurrence. Five- and ten-year progression-free survival was 90% and 72%, accounting for a. statistically significant difference (P = 0.0001) with progression-free survival following previous debulking surgery (median 11 months; range 2–31). All cases showed low proliferative activity assessed by mitotic rate and Ki-67 expression.

Conclusions

MCPM is a borderline tumour with a high propensity to local–regional recurrence. Definitive tumour eradication by means of cytoreduction and HIPEC seems more effective than debulking surgery in preventing disease relapse. Low mitotic rate and poor Ki-67 expression might be related to the peculiar behaviour of MCMP.     

Prognostic factors and oncologic outcome in 146 patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Italian multicenter study S.I.T.I.L.O.

Aim

The present study was specifically designed to assess the major clinical and pathological variables of patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis in order to investigate whether currently used criteria appropriately select candidates for peritonectomy procedures (cytoreductive surgery) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Patients and methods

Preoperative, operative and follow-up data on 146 consecutive patients presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin and treated by surgical cytoreduction combined with HIPEC in 5 Italian Hospital and University Centers were prospectively entered in a common database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the prognostic value of clinical and pathologic factors.

Results

Over a minimum 24-month follow-up, the overall morbidity rate was 27.4% (mortality rate: 2.7%) and was directly related to the extent of surgery. Peritoneal cancer index (PCI), unfavorable peritoneal sites, synchronous or previously resected liver metastasis and the completeness of cytoreduction, all emerged as independent prognostic factors correlated with survival.

Conclusions

Until research provides more effective criteria for selecting patients based upon the biomolecular features of carcinomatosis, patients should be selected according to the existing independent prognostic variables.     

CA 19-9 to peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) ratio is prognostic in patients with epithelial appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and peritoneal dissemination undergoing cytoreduction surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Serum tumour levels have been shown to be prognostic in patients with epithelial appendiceal mucinous neoplasms with peritoneal dissemination (pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP)). A singular index which incorporates both tumour activity (as depicted by serum tumour marker levels) and tumour volume (as depicted by peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI)), may give a more precise surrogate of tumour biological behaviour. The prognostic implication of this index has not yet been reported.

Advanced cytoreduction as surgical standard of care and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as promising treatment in epithelial ovarian cancer

Favorable oncological outcomes have been reported in several trials with the introduction of Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC). However most of the studies testing the combined approach are observational and have been conducted in inhomogeneous series so that the evidence supporting the performance of this combined treatment is still poor. Median Overall and Disease Free Survivals of up to 64 months and 57 months, respectively have been reported. Although a rate of morbidity of up to 40% has been observed in some series the CRS + HIPEC continues to gain an increased popularity. Several prospective randomized trials are ongoing using the procedure in various time points of the disease.In this review several issues such as the impact of cytoreduction and residual disease (RD) on outcomes as well as the role of HIPEC will be updated from the literature evidence. Some controversial points HIPEC related will also be discussed.Recent experiences regarding the introduction of a more aggressive surgical approach to upper abdomen to resect peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) allowed increased rates of optimal cytoreduction and has demonstrated an apparent better outcome. This evidence associated with the positive results phase III trial testing normothermic intraperitoneal as first-line chemotherapy is guiding some investigators to propose the CRS + HIPEC in the primary setting. Several prospective phase II and III trials have recently been launched to validate the role of the combined treatment in various time points of disease natural evolution.     

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A randomised trial

BackgroundFirst-line treatment of isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases remains unclear. This study (the Swedish peritoneal study) compares cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (surgery arm) with systemic chemotherapy (chemotherapy arm).MethodsPatients deemed resectable preoperatively were randomised to surgery and intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil 550 mg/m²/d for 6 d with repeated courses every month or to systemic oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil regimen every second week. Both treatments continued for 6 months. Primary end-point was overall survival (OS) and secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), and morbidity.ResultsThe study terminated prematurely when 48 eligible patients (24/arm) were included due to recruitment difficulties. Two-year OS was 54% in the surgery arm and 38% in the chemotherapy arm (p = 0.04). After 5 years, 8 versus 1 patient were alive, respectively (p = 0.02). Median OS was 25 months versus 18 months, respectively, hazard ratio 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.27–0.96, p = 0.04). PFS in the surgery arm was 12 months versus 11 months in the chemotherapy arm (p = 0.16) with 17% versus 0% 5-year PFS. Grade III–IV morbidity was seen in 42% and 50% of the patients, respectively. No mortalities.ConclusionsCytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be superior to systemic oxaliplatin-based treatment of colorectal cancer with resectable isolated peritoneal metastases.(ClinicalTrials.gov nr:NCT01524094).     

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: Prognosis and treatment of recurrences in a cohort study

Background

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is gaining acceptance, but controversy remains. The primary aims were to analyse the outcome and prognostic variables of colorectal PC patients treated with CRS and IPC, and to report on the outcome of additional surgical treatments of subsequent recurrences.

Methods

Patients referred for treatment of colorectal PC between 1996 and 2010 were included in a cohort. The following data was collected: clinicopathological parameters, survival, recurrences, perioperative chemotherapy and type of IPC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC; or sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, SPIC). Multivariable analyses were conducted on potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

Results

In the 151-patient cohort, the median OS was 34 months (range: 2–77) for CRS and HIPEC with five-year survival predicted at 40% (five-year disease-free survival 32%). For CRS and SPIC, the OS was 25 months (range: 2–188) with five-year survival at 18%. Open-and-close patients survived 6 months (range: 0–14) with no five-year survival (HIPEC vs. SPIC p = 0.047, SPIC vs. open-and-close p < 0.001). Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was a noteworthy independent prognostic factor in the multivariable analysis. OS for patients undergoing additional surgical treatment of recurrences was 25 months vs. 10 months with best supportive care or palliative chemotherapy (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Substantial long-term survival is possible in patients with colorectal PC. HIPEC was associated with better OS than SPIC and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy may improve the outcome in patients. Good OS is achievable in selected patients undergoing additional surgical treatment of isolated liver or peritoneal recurrences after prior complete CRS.     

Cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal carcinoma: non-mucinous tumour associated with an improved survival

AIMS: Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been reported as a treatment option for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Thirty patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis underwent cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. All appendiceal cancers were excluded. All patients were followed until January 2006 or death. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate significant prognostic factors for overall survival, defined from the time of surgery. RESULTS: There were 13 male patients. The mean age at the time of surgery was 54years. There was no hospital mortality. The mean duration of hospital stay was 27days. The overall median survival was 29months, with 1- and 2-year survival of 72% and 64%, respectively. Twenty-one patients had complete cytoreduction and their 1- and 2-year survival rates were 85% and 71%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with non-mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) < or =13, and complete cytoreduction were associated with an improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study reported on 30 patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Patients with mucinous tumour had relatively more extensive intraperitoneal disease. Non-mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma, PCI < or =13, and complete cytoreduction were associated with an improved survival.     

The Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Ovarian Cancer

Overall outcomes for women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain relatively poor, and superior methods of treatment are needed. EOC is a peritoneal surface malignancy that is relatively sensitive to chemotherapy agents, making it a good target for i.p. chemotherapy. Because there is strong laboratory data demonstrating the ability of hyperthermia to increase the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents, the addition of hyperthermia to i.p. chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), makes theoretical sense. This article reviews the current literature and discusses the possible role for HIPEC in EOC at significant natural history time points: front line, at the time of interval debulking, in consolidation, and for recurrent disease. The conclusion is that much further research is needed but that HIPEC could sensibly be researched at all the natural history time points in EOC.