Clonal and parallel evolution of primary lung cancers and their metastases revealed by molecular dissection of cancer cells.

PURPOSE: Several models of cancer progression, including clonal evolution, parallel evolution, and same-gene models, have been proposed to date. The purpose of this study is to investigate the authenticity of these models by comparison of accumulated genetic alterations between primary and corresponding metastatic lung cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A whole-genome allelic imbalance scanning using a high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism array and mutational analysis of the p53, EGFR, and KRAS genes were done on eight sets of primary and metastatic lung cancers. Based on the genotype data, the natural history of each case was deduced, and candidate metastasis suppressor loci were determined. RESULTS: Five to 20 chromosomal regions showed allelic imbalance in each tumor. Accumulated genetic alterations were similar between primary and corresponding metastatic tumors, and the majority(>67%) of genetic alterations detected in metastatic tumors was also detected in the corresponding primary tumors. On the other hand, in seven of the eight cases, there were genetic alterations accumulated only in metastatic tumors. Among these alterations, allelic imbalances at chromosome 11p15 and 11p11-p13 regions were the most frequent ones (4 of 8, 50%). Likewise, four cases showed genetic alterations detected only in primary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The natural history of each case indicated that the process of metastasis varies among cases, and that all three models are applicable to lung cancer progression. According to the clonal and parallel evolution models, it is possible that a metastasis suppressor gene(s) for lung cancer is present on chromosome 11p.     

Clonal expansion and linear genome evolution through breast cancer progression from pre-invasive stages to asynchronous metastasis

Evolution of the breast cancer genome from pre-invasive stages to asynchronous metastasis is complex and mostly unexplored, but highly demanded as it may provide novel markers for and mechanistic insights in cancer progression. The increasing use of personalized therapy of breast cancer necessitates knowledge of the degree of genomic concordance between different steps of malignant progression as primary tumors often are used as surrogates of systemic disease. Based on exome sequencing we performed copy number profiling and point mutation detection on successive steps of breast cancer progression from one breast cancer patient, including two different regions of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS), primary tumor and an asynchronous metastasis. We identify a remarkable landscape of somatic mutations, retained throughout breast cancer progression and with new mutational events emerging at each step. Our data, contrary to the proposed model of early dissemination of metastatic cells and parallel progression of primary tumors and metastases, provide evidence of linear progression of breast cancer with relatively late dissemination from the primary tumor. The genomic discordance between the different stages of tumor evolution in this patient emphasizes the importance of molecular profiling of metastatic tissue directing molecularly targeted therapy at recurrence.     

Clonal heterogeneity in sporadic melanomas as revealed by loss-of-heterozygosity analysis

The major obstacle preventing effective treatment of melanoma is the biological heterogeneity of tumor cells. This study was performed to determine clonal genetic heterogeneity within primary melanoma and the evolution of these heterogeneous sub-clones during disease progression. DNA samples were obtained from 44 morphologically distinct areas identified within 10 primary tumors and from 15 metastases in the same patients. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses were performed using 17 microsatellite markers that mapped to chromosomes 6q, 9p, 10q and 18q, the most frequently deleted in melanoma. Of 10 primary tumors, 8 were revealed to have intratumoral genetic heterogeneity in terms of LOH of the 4 chromosome arms examined, 7 containing at least 2 different sub-clones harboring LOH of different chromosome areas, while the remaining one tumor showed prominent intratumoral genetic heterogeneity consisting of at least 6 genetically distinct sub-clones. LOH of 6q was detected only in a sub-set of multiple microdissected samples in most of the primary tumors, but was most frequently detected in metastases, suggesting that loss of this chromosome arm occurred late and played an important part in metastatic progression. Comparison of LOH between sub-clones within primary tumors and within metastases showed the divergence of metastatic clones from dominant populations within the primary tumor in 5 patients, whereas in the remaining three patients parent sub-clones were not identified, or constituted only a minor sub-population within the primary tumors. These results, showing considerable genetic heterogeneity in sporadic melanoma, have profound implications for the choice of future therapeutic strategies.     

Molecular evidence for a clonal relationship between multiple lesions in patients with unknown primary adenocarcinoma

Unknown primary adenocarcinoma (UPA) comprises a group of heterogeneous cancers of great clinical and biological interest. UPA presents as metastatic disease without a detectable primary site after medical workup. Here we investigated whether or not a clonal relationship exists between multiple tumors within individual UPA patients. A molecular resemblance would argue for an early clonal outgrowth of tumor cells from the primary lesion, a mutual feature observed within this group of neoplasms. In 14 patients with UPA multiple tumors, obtained at autopsy, were analyzed by molecular allelotyping and immunohistochemistry. In addition, tumors of 4 patients could be analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Similar genetic and phenotypic profiles were used as indicator for a clonal relationship, whereas different profiles implicate independent tumors. The molecular data indicated that the multiple lesions in the 14 UPA patients, including the primary tumors, are clonally related. In agreement with the theory of tumor progression, some metastatic lesions showed additional genetic alterations besides the characteristics that were shared with the primary tumor. Furthermore, 8 UPA patients had tumors with a high frequency of allelic loss and/or imbalance (FALI; 43-71%), while 6 patients demonstrated a lower FALI (14-29%), suggesting the occurrence of chromosomal instability in the former group. Our data provide molecular evidence for a clonal relationship between multiple metastases and the primary tumor within individual UPA patients, independent of the anatomical origin of the cancer. This finding is in agreement with the suggestion that tumor progression is rapid in UPA patients, limiting the chance of clonal divergence. The identification of 2 groups of UPAs with either a high or low FALI indicates that chromosomal instability is not the only driving force behind early tumor cell dissemination. Thus, other molecular mechanisms must underlie the common biology of these tumors.     

Snail is critical for tumor growth and metastasis of ovarian carcinoma

Snail, a key inducer of epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT), plays an important role in cancer metastasis. To better understand the role of Snail in the metastasis of ovarian carcinoma, expression of Snail was knocked down by antisense‐Snail in the highly metastatic ovarian cancer cell line HO8910PM. Gene array analysis revealed that blocking Snail expression suppressed the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and upregulated TIMP3, an MMP inhibitor. These findings suggest that Snail interacts with MMP during tumor invasion and metastasis. In addition, we examined the role of Snail in an ovarian cancer orthotopic model by using the antisense‐Snail HO8910PM cell line. We found that the size of primary ovarian cancer tumor and the number of metastatic lesions were significantly reduced when Snail was knocked down. Confirming our initial findings, the activity of MMP2 was greatly inhibited in tumors from antisense‐Snail cells. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis on ovarian cancer progression tissue array demonstrated that the expression of Snail was significantly higher in metastatic lesions, and Snail expression correlated with the stage of ovarian cancer. Interestingly, in early‐stage tumors, Snail was localized in both the cytoplasm and nucleus. In late stage and metastatic lesions, the level of Snail was elevated, and Snail was localized to the nucleus. The expression level and nuclear localization of Snail were also inversely correlated with E‐cadherin expression. Overall, our study indicates that Snail plays a critical role in tumor growth and metastasis of ovarian carcinoma through regulation of MMP activity.     

Tumor Evolution and Intratumor Heterogeneity of an Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Revealed by Whole-Genome Sequencing

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is characterized by significant genomic instability that could lead to clonal diversity. Intratumor clonal heterogeneity has been proposed as a major attribute underlying tumor evolution, progression, and resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. Understanding genetic heterogeneity could lead to treatments specific to resistant and metastatic tumor cells. To characterize the degree of intratumor genetic heterogeneity within a single tumor, we performed whole-genome sequencing on three separate regions of an human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and two separate regions from one corresponding cervical lymph node metastasis. This approach achieved coverage of approximately 97.9% of the genome across all samples. In total, 5701 somatic point mutations (SPMs) and 4347 small somatic insertions and deletions (indels)were detected in at least one sample. Ninety-two percent of SPMs and 77% of indels were validated in a second set of samples adjacent to the discovery set. All five tumor samples shared 41% of SPMs, 57% of the 1805 genes with SPMs, and 34 of 55 cancer genes. The distribution of SPMs allowed phylogenetic reconstruction of this tumor''s evolutionary pathway and showed that the metastatic samples arose as a late event. The degree of intratumor heterogeneity showed that a single biopsy may not represent the entire mutational landscape of HNSCC tumors. This approach may be used to further characterize intratumor heterogeneity in more patients, and their sample-to-sample variations could reveal the evolutionary process of cancer cells, facilitate our understanding of tumorigenesis, and enable the development of novel targeted therapies.     

Metastatic potential: a generic characteristic of the primary tumor

How do metastases arise from the primary tumor? To address this important question at both cognitive and clinical levels, the somatic genetic of cancers has proposed two models based on our knowledge of genes underlying tumor progression through the use of both patients' tumors and experimental models. The first model proposes the emergence of a subpopulation of rare and variant highly metastatic cells. The second model suggests the occurrence of a pre-malignant state of all the tumor cells which further metastasize without additional transitions in gene expression. Today, the science of functional genomic allows revisiting this debatted concern.     

Establishing the origin of metastatic deposits in the setting of multiple primary malignancies: The role of massively parallel sequencing

In this proof‐of‐principle study, we sought to define whether targeted capture massively parallel sequencing can be employed to determine the origin of metastatic deposits in cases of synchronous primary malignancies and metastases in distinct anatomical sites. DNA samples extracted from synchronous tumor masses in the breast, adnexal, and pelvic‐peritoneal regions from a 62‐year‐old BRCA1 germline mutation carrier were subjected to targeted massively parallel sequencing using a platform comprising 300 cancer genes known to harbor actionable mutations. In addition to BRCA1 germline mutations, all lesions harbored somatic loss of the BRCA1 wild‐type allele and TP53 somatic mutations. The primary breast cancer displayed a TP53 frameshift (p.Q317fs) mutation, whereas and the adnexal lesion harbored a TP53 nonsense (p.R213*) mutation, consistent with a diagnosis of two independent primary tumors (i.e. breast and ovarian cancer). The adnexal tumor and all pelvic‐peritoneal implants harbored identical TP53 (p.R213*) and NCOA2 (p.G952R) somatic mutations. Evidence of genetic heterogeneity within and between lesions was observed, both in terms of somatic mutations and copy number aberrations. The repertoires of somatic genetic aberrations found in the breast, ovarian, and pelvic‐peritoneal lesions provided direct evidence in support of the distinct origin of the breast and ovarian cancers, and established that the pelvic‐peritoneal implants were clonally related to the ovarian lesion. These observations were consistent with those obtained with immunohistochemical analyses employing markers to differentiate between carcinomas of the breast and ovary, including WT1 and PAX8. Our results on this case of a patient with BRCA1‐mutant breast and ovarian cancer demonstrate that massively parallel sequencing may constitute a useful tool to define the relationship, clonality and intra‐tumor genetic heterogeneity between primary tumor masses and their metastatic deposits in patients with multiple primary malignancies and synchronous metastases.     

A study of tumor heterogeneity in a case with breast cancer

Tumor heterogeneity has been suggested based on clinical and pathological findings. Several clinical findings can be explained by tumor evolution during progression and metastasis. We herein report a case of metastatic breast cancer indicated tumor heterogeneity by clinical findings and a genomic analysis. A 64-year-old woman with advanced breast cancer was treated with primary chemotherapy, to which primary tumor responded. After a 6 month treatment pause, lung, liver, and skin metastases developed and her serum tumor markers were elevated. None of those serum markers had been elevated before the treatment, despite the large tumor burden. Notably, there was discordance in the expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) between the primary tumor and metastatic skin lesions, with the former being negative and the latter positive. A genomic analysis was performed by in-house Breast Cancer Panel, which consisted of 53 pre-selected genes. Twenty-three somatic mutations were found in primary breast tumor and 7 in the skin metastasis. None of these 30 genes matched. However, the cell-free (cf) DNA in the plasma taken at the time of skin metastasis contained 10 mutations, 7 from the primary lesion and 3 from the metastasis. These data indicate that the clonal changes or tumor heterogeneity was shown in two solid tumors by clinical and the result of a genomic analysis. Of particular interest was that cell-free DNA could be a powerful tool to look into these dynamic changes.     

Allelic imbalance in the clonal evolution of prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: To understand better the genetic basis of the clonal evolution of prostate carcinoma, the authors analyzed the pattern of allelic loss in 25 matched primary and metastatic prostate tumors. METHODS: Twenty-five cases were selected from the surgical pathology files of the Mayo Clinic from patients who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy between 1987-1991. All patients had regional lymph node metastases at the time of surgery. DNA samples for the analysis of allelic loss pattern were prepared from primary tumors and matched synchronous lymph node metastases by tissue microdissection. The oligonucleotide primer pairs for the microsatellite DNA markers were D8S133, D8S136, D8S137, ANK1 on chromosome 8p12-21, LPLTET on chromosome 8p22, and D17S855 (intragenic to the BRCA1 gene) on chromosome 17q21. One case was not informative at any of the loci tested and was excluded from further analysis. RESULTS: The overall frequency of allelic imbalance was 79% in primary tumors and 88% in paired metastases. Of 24 informative cases, 14 patients (58%) showed the same pattern of allelic loss or retention in matched primary and metastatic tumors at all marker locus; discordant allelic loss was observed in the remaining 10 patients (42%). Four patients showed loss of the same allele at one or more marker loci in both primary and metastatic tumors, but discordant allelic loss was observed at other marker loci. Five patients showed allelic loss in at least one genetic marker in the metastatic tumor but not in its matched primary tumor. Five patients displayed loss of one allele at one or more marker loci in a primary tumor but not in the matched metastases. There was no significant difference in the frequency of allelic imbalance between primary and metastatic tumors at any marker analyzed (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that different patterns of allelic deletion may be acquired during cancer progression to metastases. The differences in genetic composition between primary prostate carcinoma and its metastases may be related to intrinsic cancer heterogeneity, overall genetic instability, and clonal divergence.     

Clonal origin of lymph node metastases in bladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Evidence of genetic heterogeneity within urothelial carcinomas of the bladder has raised questions about the clonal origin of urothelial carcinoma and its metastases. High-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder frequently metastasizes to multiple regional lymph nodes in the pelvis. Whether or not these multiple lymph node metastases originate from the same tumor clone is uncertain. Molecular analysis of microsatellite alterations and X-chromosome inactivation status of distinct tumor cell populations from the same patient may further our understanding of the genetic basis of carcinoma progression and metastasis. METHODS: The authors examined 24 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma. All patients had multiple (from two to four) lymph node metastases. Genomic DNA samples were prepared from formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue sections using laser-assisted microdissection. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) assays for 3 microsatellite polymorphic markers on chromosome 9p21 (D9S171, region of putative tumor suppressor gene p16), 9q32 (D9S177, putative tumor suppressor gene involved in urothelial carcinoma tumorigenesis), and 17p13 (TP53, the p53 locus) were performed. In addition, X-chromosome inactivation analysis was performed in primary tumors and metastases from 10 female patients. RESULTS: In total, 79 tumors were analyzed. The overall frequency of allelic loss was 67% (16 of 24 tumors) in the primary urothelial carcinomas and 79% (19 of 24 tumors) in the metastatic carcinomas. The primary urothelial carcinoma showed LOH at the D9S171, D9S177, and TP53 loci in 39% (9 of 23 tumors), 30% (6 of 20 tumors), and 30% (7 of 23 tumors) of informative samples, respectively. LOH in > or = 1 lymph node metastases was seen at the D9S171, D9S177, and TP53 loci in 35% (8 of 23 tumors), 45% (9 of 20 tumors), and 48% (11 of 23 tumors) of informative samples, respectively. Eleven tumors demonstrated identical allelic loss patterns at all DNA loci both in the primary carcinoma and in all corresponding lymph node metastases. Three tumors showed allelic loss in the metastatic carcinoma but not in its matched primary carcinoma. Six tumors demonstrated a different LOH pattern in each of its lymph node metastases. Clonality analysis showed the same pattern of nonrandom X-chromosome inactivation both in the primary urothelial carcinoma and in all of the lymph node metastases in five of nine informative tumors studied. Four tumors showed a random pattern of X-chromosome inactivation in both the primary carcinoma and in the metastases. CONCLUSIONS: LOH and X-chromosome inactivation assays showed that multiple lymph node metastases and matched primary urothelial carcinomas of the bladder had the same clonal origin, suggesting that the capability for metastasis often arises in only a single clonal population in the primary tumor. The variable LOH patterns observed in some of the tumors likely reflect genetic divergence during the clonal evolution of urothelial carcinoma.     

Genetic and clonal dissection of osteosarcoma progression and lung metastasis

Osteosarcoma is a primary malignant bone tumor that has a high potential to metastasize to lungs. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying the dissemination of OS cancer cells to lungs. We performed whole exome sequencing of 13 OS primary tumors, with matched lung metastases and normal tissues. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that lung metastatic tumors often harbor clones that are nonexistent or rare in the matched primary OS tumors. Spatially and temporally separated lung metastases were from parallel seeding events with a polyphyletic pattern. Loss of TP53 or RB1 is among the early events during OS tumorigenesis, while loss of PTEN is involved at the later stages associated with lung metastases. Finally, KEAP1 was identified as a novel biomarker for increased metastatic risk. Patients whose primary tumors harbored KEAP1 amplification have significantly poorer lung‐metastasis free survival. This finding was validated in two independent datasets. Further, in vitro experiments exhibited that KEAP1 depletion suppressed the invasion of OS cells. Our findings uncover the patterns of clonal evolution during OS progression and highlight KEAP1 as a novel candidate associated with the risk of lung metastasis in OS patients.     

Notch signaling in CD66+ cells drives the progression of human cervical cancers

Human epithelial tumor progression and metastasis involve cellular invasion, dissemination in the vasculature, and regrowth at metastatic sites. Notch signaling has been implicated in metastatic progression but its roles have yet to be fully understood. Here we report the important role of Notch signaling in maintaining cells expressing the carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule CEACAM (CD66), a known mediator of metastasis. CD66 and Notch1 were studied in clinical specimens and explants of human cervical cancer, including specimens grown in a pathophysiologically relevant murine model. Gene expression profiling of CD66(+) cells from primary tumors showed enhanced features of Notch signaling, metastasis, and stemness. Significant differences were also seen in invasion, colony formation, and tumor forming efficiency between CD66(+) and CD66(-) cancer cells. Notably, CD66(+) cells showed a marked sensitivity to a Notch small molecule inhibitor. In support of studies in established cell lines, we documented the emergence of a tumorigenic CD66(+) cell subset within a metastatic lesion-derived cervical-cancer cell line. Similar to primary cancers, CD66 expression in the cell line was blocked by chemical and genetic inhibitors of ligand-dependent nuclear Notch signaling. Collectively, our work on the oncogenic properties of CD66(+) cells in epithelial cancers provides insights into the nature of tumor progression and offers a mechanistic rationale to inhibit the Notch signaling pathway as a generalized therapeutic strategy to treat metastatic cancers.     

Genetic evidence for progressive selection and overgrowth of primary tumors by metastatic cell subpopulations

We have exploited random insertions of transfected DNA as unique clonotypic markers to follow cell lineages during primary and metastatic tumor growth of a mouse mammary adenocarcinoma, SP1. Southern analysis was undertaken of primary solid tumors and metastases obtained after injection of a pooled population of individual SP1 transfectants, or reconstituted mixtures of genetically marked metastatic and unmarked nonmetastatic cells. Here we provide evidence for the reproducible selection and eventual overgrowth of primary tumors by genotypically distinct metastatic clones, thereby illustrating that late-state, advanced primary tumors can evolve to become biologically similar, or even identical, to distant metastases. The selective growth advantage of metastatic cells within primary tumors was shown to occur despite the fact that tumors generated by both metastatic and nonmetastatic SP1 cell populations grew at comparable growth rates when injected and analyzed separately. The extent of the local growth advantage manifested by individual metastatic clones varied considerably, from 5- to 50-fold. Clonal overgrowth was also observed whether the tumor cells were injected ectopically, or orthotopically (i.e., into the mammary fat). This type of experimental approach should provide new insights into the dynamics of tumor progression and metastasis, the lineage relationship of primary tumors to metastases, the influence of clonal interactions on tumor behavior, and the physiological changes which are causative of malignant disease.     

Genetic progression of malignant melanoma

Malignant melanoma of the skin is the most aggressive human cancer given that a primary tumor a few millimeters in diameter frequently has full metastatic competence. In view of that, revealing the genetic background of this potential may also help to better understand tumor dissemination in general. Genomic analyses have established the molecular classification of melanoma based on the most frequent driver oncogenic mutations (BRAF, NRAS, KIT) and have also revealed a long list of rare events, including mutations and amplifications as well as genetic microheterogeneity. At the moment, it is unclear whether any of these rare events have role in the metastasis initiation process since the major drivers do not have such a role. During lymphatic and hematogenous dissemination, the clonal selection process is evidently reflected by differences in oncogenic drivers in the metastases versus the primary tumor. Clonal selection is also evident during lymphatic progression, though the genetic background of this immunoselection is less clear. Genomic analyses of metastases identified further genetic alterations, some of which may correspond to metastasis maintenance genes. The natural genetic progression of melanoma can be modified by targeted (BRAF or MEK inhibitor) or immunotherapies. Some of the rare events in primary tumors may result in primary resistance, while further new genetic lesions develop during the acquired resistance to both targeted and immunotherapies. Only a few genetic lesions of the primary tumor are constant during natural or therapy-modulated progression. EGFR4 and NMDAR2 mutations, MITF and MET amplifications and PTEN loss can be considered as metastasis drivers. Furthermore, BRAF and MITF amplifications as well as PTEN loss are also responsible for resistance to targeted therapies, whereas NRAS mutation is the only founder genetic lesion showing any association with sensitivity to immunotherapies. Unfortunately, there are hardly any data on the possible organ-specific metastatic drivers in melanoma. These observations suggest that clinical management of melanoma patients must rely on the genetic analysis of the metastatic lesions to be able to monitor progression-associated changes and to personalize therapies.     

Genetic and nongenetic mechanisms for colorectal cancer evolution

The stepwise accumulation of key driver mutations is responsible for the development and malignant progression of colorectal cancer in primary sites. Genetic mouse model studies have revealed combinations of driver gene mutations that induce phenotypic changes in tumors toward malignancy. However, cancer evolution is regulated by not only genetic alterations but also nongenetic mechanisms. For example, certain populations of metastatic cancer cells show a loss of malignant characteristics even after the accumulation of driver mutations, and such cells are eliminated in a negative selection manner. Furthermore, a polyclonal metastasis model has recently been proposed, in which cell clusters consisting of genetically heterogeneous cells break off from the primary site, disseminate to distant organs, and develop into heterogenous metastatic tumors. Such nongenetic mechanisms for malignant progression have been elucidated using genetically engineered mouse models as well as organoid transplantation experiments. In this review article, we discuss the role of genetic alterations in the malignant progression of primary intestinal tumors and nongenetic mechanisms for negative selection and polyclonal metastasis, which we learned from model studies.     

Genetic alterations related to lymph node metastasis and peritoneal dissemination in epithelial ovarian cancers

Genetic alterations are assumed to be necessary for the development and progression of ovarian cancer. However, the genetic alterations that occur during lymph node metastasis and peritoneal dissemination are poorly understood. In the present study, we used comparative genomic hybridization to detect genetic alterations in 30 tumors from patients with primary ovarian cancers and analyzed the associations of these genetic alterations with clinical stage and surgical pathological factors, such as histological grade, lymph node metastasis, and peritoneal dissemination. The total number of genetic alterations per tumor ranged from 0 to 39, with an average of 17.7 alterations per tumor. Among the genetic alterations in ovarian cancers, gains on chromosomes 8q and 3q and losses on chromosomes 17p, 18q, and 4q were observed frequently. Although the difference in total numbers of genetic alterations between early-stage tumors and advanced-stage tumors was not significant, the difference was significant when high-grade cancers were compared with low-grade cancers. Eight regions on seven chromosomes showed genetic alterations related to lymph node metastasis or peritoneal dissemination. Gain at 11q13-q14 and loss at 17q11.2-q21 were related not only to lymph node metastasis and peritoneal dissemination but also to clinical stage and histological grade.     

Expression of KAI1/CD82 in distant metastases from estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer

The tetraspanin protein superfamily member KAI1 suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in animal models and is downregulated in various human malignancies. In breast cancer, KAI1 is preferentially lost in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors. Interestingly, most ER-negative primary breast cancers retain KAI1 expression. This study aimed to evaluate whether or not KAI1 is downregulated during progression to metastasis of these carcinomas. Expression of KAI1, ER, progesterone receptor, c-ErbB2, and Ki67 was analyzed in tissue microarrays comprising a large collection of distant organ metastases from human breast cancers ( n  = 92) by immunohistochemistry. Results were compared with a previously characterized set of primary breast tumors ( n  = 209). Immunoreactivity for KAI1 was observed in one-third of the metastases and was associated with lack of ER expression ( P  = 0.005). The high frequency of KAI1-positive cases in ER-negative primary tumors was maintained in ER-negative metastases. Expression of KAI1 was also observed in MDA-MB-468 and SK-BR-3, two ER-negative breast cancer cell lines of metastatic origin. Moreover, a reanalysis of independent microarray gene expression data indicated maintenance of KAI1 mRNA expression in metastases from ER-negative breast cancers. Furthermore, in a series of matched pairs of mammary carcinomas and metachronous distant metastases, all metastases from KAI1-positive/ER-negative primary tumors were KAI1-positive as well. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the expression of KAI1 is maintained during progression to metastasis in a large proportion of ER-negative mammary carcinomas. This has significant implications for the use of KAI1 as a clinical marker and the understanding of the metastatic process in human breast cancer. ( Cancer Sci 2009; 100: 1767–1771)     

Genetic alterations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization: correlation with clinical and histological data

In order to optimize the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) it is important to define the genetic risk for metastatic disease. In this study we performed comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on metastatic tumors aiming at the identification of genetic alterations associated with metastatic disease. We analyzed 46 renal tumors along with their metastases, and 15 non-metastatic renal tumors. Tumors were classified pathologically according to the Heidelberg classification of RCC, and staged according to the TNM-system. Standard CGH was performed using microdissected archival tissues and DOP-PCR. The average numbers of chromosomal aberrations per tumor were 3.0, 2.1 and 3.9 in patients without metastasis, in patients who developed metastases after a two-year latency period (late onset of metastatic disease) and in patients who developed metastases within two years after therapy of the primary tumor (early onset of metastatic disease). CGH revealed chromosomal aberrations in 91% of primary metastatic tumors. Deletions or losses of chromosomes 9 (26% vs 6%), 10 (21% vs 6%) and 18 (23% vs 0) and 17 (28% vs 7%) occurred more often in metastatic tumors than in non-metastatic tumors. Furthermore, these aberrations were more common in patients with early metastases. CGH analysis of 40 pairs of primary RCCs and their corresponding metastasis revealed similar aberrations in 70% of cases. In 30%, however, metastases showed additional chromosomal aberrations not detected in the corresponding primary tumors. In conclusion, we identified genetic alterations associated with metastatic disease in RCC which could be useful for predicting prognosis. Genetic changes leading to metastases occurred early in tumorigenesis of metastatic tumors.