Reproductive factors and menopausal hormone therapy and bladder cancer risk in the NIH‐AARP Diet and Health Study

The incidence of bladder cancer among women is at least one‐third to one‐fourth that observed among men in many countries. Even after accounting for known risk factors, the reason for this gender disparity remains unexplained. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of reproductive factors and exogenous hormone use with a primary focus on menopausal hormone therapy use and risk of bladder cancer in women in the NIH‐AARP Diet and Health Study. Reproductive and hormonal factors were ascertained on the baseline questionnaire in 1995–1996 among 201,492 females who were followed until December 31, 2006. During follow‐up, 651 cases of bladder cancer were diagnosed. A subset of women provided detailed information on use of MHT in a second questionnaire in 1996–1997. In this analysis, 127,361 females were followed through June 30, 2002 and 198 incident bladder cancer cases were identified. Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for smoking status, cigarettes per day and body mass index using age as the time metric, were used to obtain hazard ratios (HRs). A reduced risk was observed among parous women (HR=0.76; 95% CI 0.62–0.93) and women who reported late age at menarche (≥15 years) (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.39–0.84). Women who reported ever using estrogen and progestin therapy had a decreased risk (HR=0.53; 95% CI: 0.34–0.83) compared with women who did not report MHT use. No association was observed for estrogen only users (HR=0.82; 95% CI: 0.58–1.15). Our results suggest a putative role for sex hormones in the etiology of bladder cancer among women.     

Oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, reproductive history and risk of colorectal cancer in women

Evidence from epidemiologic studies suggests a possible role of exogenous and endogenous hormones in colorectal carcinogenesis in women. However, with respect to exogenous hormones, in contrast to hormone replacement therapy, few cohort studies have examined oral contraceptive use in relation to colorectal cancer risk. We used data from a large cohort study of Canadian women enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer screening to assess the association of oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy and reproductive factors with risk of colorectal cancer, overall and by subsite within the colorectum. Cancer incidence and mortality were ascertained by linkage to national databases. Among 89,835 women aged 40-59 at enrollment and followed for an average of 16.4 years, we identified 1,142 incident colorectal cancer cases. Proportional hazards models were used to estimate the associations between the exposures of interest and risk of colorectal cancer. Ever use of oral contraceptives at baseline was associated with a modest reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.94), with similar effects for different subsites within the colorectum. No trend was seen in the hazard ratios with increasing duration of oral contraceptive use. No associations were seen with use of hormone replacement therapy (ever use or duration of use) or reproductive factors. Our results are suggestive of an inverse association between oral contraceptive use and colorectal carcinogenesis. However, given the lack of a dose-response relationship and the potential for confounding, studies with more complete assessment of exogenous hormone use throughout the life course are needed to clarify this association.     

Reproductive factors and exogenous hormone use and risk of adult glioma in women in the NIH‐AARP Diet and Health Study

Experimental evidence suggests that estrogen and other steroid hormones may protect against glioma. Although epidemiologic studies provide only weak support for a role of exogenous or endogenous hormones in gliogenesis, few cohort studies have addressed this question. The authors, therefore, examined the association between menstrual and reproductive factors, exogenous hormone use, and glioma risk among 225,355 women aged 50–71 years who completed the baseline questionnaire in the NIH‐AARP Diet and Health Study. During 7.5 years of follow‐up, 174 cases of incident, primary glioma were ascertained. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for exposures, taking potential confounders into account. Older age at menarche was positively associated with risk: HR 1.67 (95% CI: 1.03, 2.69). Other reproductive factors, including age at first live birth, parity, age at menopause, type of menopause (natural vs. medical) and exogenous hormone use showed no association with glioma risk. The results were similar when the analysis was restricted to cases with glioblastoma (N = 130). The present study provides only limited support for the hypothesis that menstrual/reproductive factors or exogenous hormone use play a role in gliogenesis.     

Menopausal estrogen therapy and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma: A post‐hoc analysis of women's health initiative randomized clinical trial

Estrogens are important immunomodulators, exerting significant effects on cell proliferation, apoptosis, cytokine production and differentiation of hematopoietic cells. Estrogen receptors are expressed on normal B and T lymphocytes, bone marrow and in leukemia and lymphoma cell lines. Epidemiologic evidence for the association of menopausal hormone use with risk of non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has been mixed; however, all of the investigations have been observational. We analyzed the data from Women's Health Initiative hormone therapy trials where conjugated equine estrogens (CEE; 0.625 mg/d) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA; 2.5 mg/d) (n = 16,654) or CEE alone (women with prior hysterectomy) (n = 10,685) were tested against placebos and the intervention lasted a median of 5.6 years in the CEE + MPA trial and 7.2 years in the CEE alone trial. During 13 years of follow‐up through September 20, 2013 383 incident NHL cases were identified. We used the intent‐to‐treat approach to calculate incidence rates of NHL, hazards ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by treatment group. Incidence of NHL was virtually the same in the treatment and placebo groups. The HR was 1.02 (95%CI 0.74–1.39) for CEE alone, 0.98 (95% CI 0.76–1.28) for CEE+MPA, and 1.00 (95% CI 0.82–1.22) for both combined. There were no specific NHL subtypes associated with either type of the treatment, except a marginally decreased risk of plasma cell neoplasms (HR= 0.53 95% CI 0.27–1.03) in the CEE‐alone group. These results do not support a role of estrogen alone or combined with progestin in the development of NHL among postmenopausal women.     

Reproductive factors, hormone use and the risk of lung cancer among middle-aged never-smoking Japanese women: a large-scale population-based cohort study

Although a link between female hormonal factors and the risk of lung cancer has been suggested, few studies have examined this association in detail. We investigated the associations between reproductive factors, hormone use and the risk of lung cancer in a population-based prospective study. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 44,677 lifelong never-smoking women in 1990-1994 to assess menstrual and reproductive factors and hormone use. After 8-12 years of follow-up, 153 lung cancer cases were diagnosed. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Age at menopause, age at menarche, number of children, age at first live birth, breast feeding and use of hormones were not associated with a risk of lung cancer, either overall or among postmenopausal women or women with natural menopause. Compared to women with both late age at menarche (> or =16) and early age at menopause (< or =50), those with either early age at menarche or late age at menopause had a >2-fold, significant increase in the risk of lung cancer. Induced menopausal women with experience of hormone replacement therapy had a significantly elevated risk compared to naturally menopausal women without female hormone use, with an RR of 2.40 (95% CI 1.07-5.40). These findings suggest that both endogenous and extraneous estrogen may be involved in the etiology of lung cancer.     

Oral contraceptives, menopausal hormone therapy use and risk of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the California Teachers Study

We examined oral contraceptive (OC) and menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) use in relation to risk of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Women under age 85 years participating in the California Teachers Study with no history of hematopoietic cancer were followed from 1995 through 2007. A total of 516 of 114,131 women eligible for OC use analysis and 402 of 54,758 postmenopausal women eligible for MHT use analysis developed B-cell NHL. Multivariable adjusted and age stratified Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Ever versus never OC use was marginally associated with lower B-cell NHL risk, particularly among women first using OCs before age 25 years (RR=0.72, 95% CI=0.51-0.99); yet, no duration-response effect was observed. No association was observed for ever versus never MHT use among postmenopausal women (RR=1.05, 95% CI=0.83-1.33) overall or by formulation (estrogen alone, ET, or estrogen plus progestin, EPT). Among women with no MHT use, having bilateral oophorectomy plus hysterectomy was associated with greater B-cell NHL risk than having natural menopause (RR=3.15, 95% CI=1.62-6.13). Bilateral oophorectomy plus hysterectomy was not associated with risk among women who used ET or EPT. These results indicate that exogenous hormone use does not strongly influence B-cell NHL risk.     

Is estrogen plus progestin menopausal hormone therapy safe with respect to endometrial cancer risk?

Given the strong link between use of unopposed estrogens and development of endometrial cancers, estrogens are usually prescribed with a progestin, particularly for women with intact uteri. Some studies suggest that sequential use of progestins may increase risk; however, the moderating effects of usage patterns or patient characteristics, including body mass index (BMI), are unknown. We evaluated menopausal hormone use and incident endometrial cancer (n = 885) in 68,419 postmenopausal women with intact uteri enrolled in the National Institutes of Health‐American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health study. Participants completed a risk factor questionnaire in 1996–1997 and were followed up through 2006. Hazard rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox regression. Among 19,131 women reporting exclusive estrogen plus progestin use, 176 developed endometrial cancer (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.74–1.06). Long‐duration (≥10 years) sequential (<15 days progestin per month) estrogen plus progestin use was positively associated with risk (RR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.36–2.60], whereas continuous (>25 days progestin per month) estrogen plus progestin use was associated with a decreased risk (RR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.49–0.83). Increased risk for sequential estrogen plus progestin was seen only among thin‐to‐normal weight women (BMI < 25 kg/m²; RR = 2.53). Our findings support that specific categories of estrogen plus progestin use increases endometrial cancer risk, specifically long durations of sequential progestins, whereas decreased endometrial cancer risk was observed for users of short‐duration continuous progestins. Risks were highest among thin‐to‐normal weight women, presumably reflecting their lower endogenous estrogen levels, suggesting that menopausal hormones and obesity increase endometrial cancer through common etiologic pathways.     

Female reproductive factors and risk of lymphoid neoplasm: The Japan Public Health Center‐based Prospective Study

Although a possible role of reproductive factors in lymphomagenesis has been hypothesized, results of epidemiological studies have been inconsistent. Here, we investigated the association between reproductive factors and the risk of lymphoid neoplasm and its subgroups. We used data from a large‐scale, population‐based prospective study in a Japanese cohort with 42 691 eligible women aged 40‐69 years from 1990 to 1994. During a mean follow up of 18.7 years, we identified 176 cases of lymphoid neoplasm and 90 of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A multivariable‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the risk of lymphoid neoplasms and its subgroups according to self‐reported reproductive factors. Parous women had an increased risk of lymphoid neoplasm compared with nulliparous women (HR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.03‐6.13). An increased risk of lymphoid neoplasms was found in women with later onset of menarche (≤13 years old; reference: 14‐15; HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.10‐2.79: ≥16; HR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.17‐3.19: P‐trend: 0.01) and a shorter menstrual cycle (28‐29 days; reference: ≤27; HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.05‐2.43, P‐trend = 0.81). No association was observed between lymphoid neoplasms and other reproductive factors, including age at first birth, breastfeeding, type of menopause, or exogenous hormone use. Our study suggests that ever parity, late age at menarche and a short menstrual cycle length may be associated with the development of lymphoid neoplasms. The inconsistency seen in epidemiological research to date warrants further investigation.     

Endometrial carcinoma risks among menopausal estrogen plus progestin and unopposed estrogen users in a cohort of postmenopausal women.

BACKGROUND: Because unopposed estrogen substantially increases endometrial carcinoma risk, estrogen plus progestin is one menopausal hormone therapy formulation for women who have not had a hysterectomy. However, endometrial carcinoma risks among estrogen plus progestin users and among former unopposed estrogen users are not firmly established. METHODS: We evaluated endometrial carcinoma risks associated with estrogen plus progestin and unopposed estrogen therapies in 30,379 postmenopausal Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project follow-up study participants. We ascertained hormone therapy use and other risk factors during telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires between 1979 and 1998. We identified 541 endometrial carcinomas via self-report, medical records, the National Death Index, and state cancer registries. Poisson regression generated time-dependent rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Endometrial carcinoma was significantly associated with estrogen plus progestin only use (n = 68 cancers; RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9-3.5), including both sequential (progestin <15 days per cycle; n = 32 cancers; RR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.0-4.6) and continuous (progestin at least 15 days per cycle; n = 15 cancers; RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.0) regimens. The RR increased by 0.38 (95% CI, 0.20-0.64) per year of estrogen plus progestin use, and RRs increased with increasing duration of use for both regimens. The strong association with unopposed estrogen use declined after cessation but remained significantly elevated > or =10 years after last use (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Both estrogen plus progestin regimens significantly increased endometrial carcinoma risk in this study. Risks among unopposed estrogen users remained elevated long after last use. The prospect that all estrogen plus progestin regimens increase endometrial carcinoma risk deserves continued research.     

Reproductive factors and the risk of renal cell cancer among women

In etiologic studies of renal cell carcinoma the role of reproductive variables and the use of exogenous hormones have not been well examined. In a population-based case-control study including 165 female cases and 227 controls, we assessed the risk of renal cell cancer associated with reproductive factors and use of oral contraceptives and menopausal hormones. Odds ratios were computed using logistic regression analyses. Risk was positively associated with number of births and inversely associated with age at first birth, with the largest increases in risk (more than 2-fold) among women with 5 or more births after age 25. After adjustment for age, smoking status, body mass index and age at first birth, women with 5 or more births had a 2-fold risk (OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.2-4.0) relative to those with 1 or 2 births. Age at first birth, however, was no longer a risk factor when the number of births was adjusted for. The association with parity was considerably stronger among women with a history of hypertension or above-median body mass index than among those without these conditions. In addition, risk was reduced among long-term oral contraceptive users but elevated among women who had had a hysterectomy or used menopausal hormones. Our findings suggest that reproductive factors, particularly the number of births, may play an etiologic role in renal cell cancer among women and deserve further study. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Role and impact of menstrual and reproductive factors on breast cancer risk in Japan.

The aim of this study was to clarify the role and impact of menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to breast cancer and its hormone receptor-defined subtype, overall and separately among premenopausal and postmenopausal women in a low-risk population, using data from the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective study. A total of 55 537 women aged 40-69 years completed a self-administered questionnaire, which included items about menstrual and reproductive history. During 1990-2002, 441 newly diagnosed cases of breast cancer were identified. Early age at menarche for premenopausal women, late age at natural menopause, nulliparity and low parity for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and late age at first birth for postmenopausal women were significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. No overall significant associations were seen between the use of exogenous female hormones or breast feeding and breast cancer risk. Age at menarche and age at natural menopause were somewhat more closely associated with the risk of progesterone receptor-negative than positive breast cancer although no difference was observed for estrogen receptor status. Risks associated with parity, number of births and age at first birth did not significantly differ by hormone receptor-defined breast cancer. Our findings suggest that menstrual and reproductive factors may play an important role in the development of breast cancer among low-risk populations, similarly as they do in Western populations, and that risk factors might differ by hormone receptor status.     

Hysterectomy,oophorectomy and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Hysterectomy is associated with an increased risk for adverse health outcomes. However, its connection to the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) remains unclear. The aims of our study were to investigate the associations between hysterectomy, oophorectomy and risk of NHL and its major subtypes (eg, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]), and whether these associations were modified by exogenous hormone use. Postmenopausal women (n = 141,621) aged 50–79 years at enrollment (1993–1998) from the Women's Health Initiative were followed for an average of 17.2 years. Hysterectomy and oophorectomy were self-reported at baseline. Incident NHL cases were confirmed by central review of medical records and pathology reports. During the follow-up period, a total of 1719 women were diagnosed with NHL. Hysterectomy, regardless of oophorectomy status, was associated with an increased risk of NHL (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05–1.44). Oophorectomy was not independently associated with NHL risk after adjusting for hysterectomy. When stratified by hormone use, the association between hysterectomy and NHL risk was confined to women who had never used hormone therapy (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.06–1.71), especially for DLBCL subtype (P for interaction = .01), and to those who had undergone hysterectomy before the age of 55. Our large prospective study showed that hysterectomy was a risk factor of NHL. Findings varied by hormone use. Future studies incorporating detailed information on the types and indications of hysterectomy may deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying DLBCL development and its potential interactions with hormone use.     

A prospective study of reproductive factors and exogenous hormone use in relation to ovarian cancer risk among Black women

Purpose

Extensive data in White women have linked oral contraceptive use, tubal ligation, and parity to reduced risk of ovarian cancer; results on postmenopausal female hormone use are mixed. Few studies, all of which are case–control studies, have been undertaken among Black women. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess associations of reproductive factors and exogenous hormones with ovarian cancer among Black women.

Methods

During follow-up from 1995 to 2013 in the Black Women’s Health Study, a prospective cohort study, 115 incident cases of ovarian cancer were identified. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relation of the factors of interest to risk of ovarian cancer, with control for covariates.

Result

Oral contraceptive use was inversely associated with ovarian cancer risk: The HR for ≥10 years of use relative to <1 year was 0.50 (95% CI 0.30–0.98). For postmenopausal female hormone use, the HRs for ever use of estrogen with progestin and of estrogen alone were 1.37 (0.73–2.55) and 1.66 (0.90–3.07), respectively. The HRs for parity and tubal ligation were below 1.0, but were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Overall, the findings indicate that the relation of reproductive factors and exogenous hormone use to risk of ovarian cancer is similar among Black and White women. The results on estrogen-only supplements and estrogen with progestin supplements add to evidence from Whites, indicating that use of hormone supplements may be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer.

     

Reproductive factors,exogenous hormone use and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among US women: results from the Liver Cancer Pooling Project

Background:

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs less commonly among women than men in almost all regions of the world. The disparity in risk is particularly notable prior to menopause suggesting that hormonal exposures during reproductive life may be protective. Exogenous oestrogenic exposures such as oral contraceptives (OCs), however, have been reported to increase risk, suggesting that estrogens may be hepatocarcinogenic. To examine the effects of reproductive factors and exogenous hormones on risk, we conducted a prospective analysis among a large group of US women.

Methods:

In the Liver Cancer Pooling Project, a consortium of US-based cohort studies, data from 799 500 women in 11 cohorts were pooled and harmonised. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of reproductive factors and exogenous hormones with HCC (n=248).

Results:

Bilateral oophorectomy was associated with a significantly increased risk of HCC (HR=2.67, 95% CI=1.22–5.85), which did not appear to be related to a shorter duration of exposure to endogenous hormones or to menopausal hormone therapy use. There was no association between OC use and HCC (HR=1.12, 95% CI=0.82–1.55). Nor were there associations with parity, age at first birth, age at natural menopause, or duration of fertility.

Conclusions:

The current study suggests that bilateral oophorectomy increases the risk of HCC but the explanation for the association is unclear. There was no association between OC use and HCC risk. Examination of endogenous hormone levels in relation to HCC may help to clarify the findings of the current study.     

Reproductive factors,exogenous female hormone use and breast cancer risk in Japanese: the Miyagi Cohort Study

The incidence of breast cancer among Japanese women is substantially increasing. This population-based prospective cohort study in Japan evaluated the associations of reproductive factors and exogenous female hormone use with breast cancer risk, both overall and separately among premenopausal and postmenopausal women. A total of 24,064 women aged 40–64 were followed from 1990 to 2003. During 309,424 person-years of follow-up, 285 breast cancer cases were documented. In overall evaluation, nulliparity was significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. There was a significant decrease in risk with increasing parity number among parous women (trend P = 0.008). No association was observed between age at menarche or age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Neither oral contraceptive (OC) use nor the use of exogenous female hormones other than OC was associated with breast cancer risk. The evaluation according to menopausal status revealed that nulliparity and parity number were significantly related to breast cancer risk only among postmenopausal women. Later age at natural menopause was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women (trend P = 0.02). Our findings suggest that parity number and age at menopause have great effects on breast cancer risk among Japanese women.     

Reproductive factors and postmenopausal hormone use in relation to endometrial cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study cohort 1976–2004

Endometrial cancer is a disease primarily driven by cumulative exposure to estrogen unopposed by progesterone. Reproductive factors associated with changes in endogenous hormone levels and use of exogenous hormones such as postmenopausal hormones influence the risk of disease. The authors used the Nurses' Health Study, comprised of 121,700 nurses, to assess the above associations. Over 28 years of follow‐up, 778 adenocarcinoma cases were diagnosed and 1,850,078 person‐years were accumulated. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A late age at menarche decreased the risk independent of body mass index (BMI) (P‐trend = 0.02). A late age at menopause increased cancer risk (P‐trend = 0.0003). An advanced age at last birth reduced the risk (P‐trend < 0.0001), however, an inverse association with age at first birth and parity diminished after adjustment for age at last birth. Compared with never users, an increased risk was observed among long‐term (≥5 years) users of both estrogen (E) (RR = 7.67, 95% CI: 5.57, 10.57) and combined estrogen plus progesterone (E+P) (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.03, 2.23). Normal‐weight (BMI < 25) women had the highest risk following E or E+P use (P‐interaction‐E = 0.0008, P‐interaction‐E+P = 0.02). The findings from this study underscore the importance of hormonal mechanisms in endometrial carcinogenesis.     

Hormone Replacement Therapy: The Debate over the Risks and Benefits To Women,from Breast Cancer To Quality of Life

The use of hormone replacement therapy, unopposed estrogen or combined estrogen plus progestin, for postmenopausal women has been debated for many years. It has been used for relief from menopausal symptoms and for protective measures from chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. There have been observational studies and randomized clinical trials undertaken to determine the benefits and risks of these therapies. There are no definite answers among the trials and there are some discrepancies. The major findings, however, have been an increase in breast and endometrial or ovarian cancer, an increase in coronary heart disease, stroke and thromboembolism, a decrease in colorectal cancer, a decrease in bone fractures and an improvement in menopausal symptoms. The current, overall recommendation to women is not to use hormone replacement therapy as a long-term protective measure, but after individual consideration, it may be appropriate on a short-term basis for relief of menopausal symptoms.     

Associations of reproductive time events and intervals with breast cancer risk: A report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study

While there is clear evidence for an association between later age at first live birth and increased breast cancer risk, associations with the timing of other reproductive events are less clear. As breast tissues undergo major structural and cellular changes during pregnancy, we examined associations between reproductive time events and intervals with breast cancer risk among parous women from the population‐based Shanghai Breast Cancer Study (SBCS). Unconditional logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with breast cancer risk for 3,269 cases and 3,341 controls. In addition to later age at first live birth, later ages at first pregnancy and last pregnancy were significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk (p‐trend = 0.002, 0.015, 0.008, respectively); longer intervals from menarche to first or last live birth were also associated with increased risk (p‐trend < 0.001, =0.018, respectively). Analyses stratified by menopausal status and estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status revealed that associations for later age at first pregnancy or live birth and longer intervals from menarche to first or last live birth occurred among premenopausal women and ER+/PR+ breast cancers, whereas the association for later age at last pregnancy occurred among postmenopausal women and women with ER+/PR? or ER?/PR+ breast cancers. Because of the high correlation with other reproductive variables, models did not include adjustment for age at first live birth; when included, the significance of all associations was attenuated. These findings suggest that while reproductive time events and intervals play an important role in breast cancer etiology, contributions may differ by menopausal status and hormone receptor status of breast cancers.     

Risk of endometrial cancer following cessation of menopausal hormone use (Washington, United States)

While there are a number of benefits to the health of postmenopausal women from use of unopposed estrogens, the increased risk of endometrial cancer related to these hormones has led many women to use combined estrogen-progestogen therapy instead, or not to use hormones at all. Most women who take hormones do so only in the early portion of their postmenopausal years, so the risk of endometrial cancer following cessation of use might bear heavily on the overal risk/benefit evaluation. We analyzed data from a case-control study of women in western Washington (United States) to assess the magnitude of excess risk of endometrial cancer following discontinuation of estrogen use. Cases (n=661) consisted of women aged 45 to 74 diagnosed between 1985 and 1991 who resided in one of three counties in Washington State. Controls (n=865) were identified by random-digit dialing. Subjects were interviewed in-person to ascertain current and prior hormone use. The analysis was restricted to women who had not received combined estrogen-progestin therapy. Among women who had used unopposed estrogens at some time, risk of endometrial cancer declined as time since last use increased. Nonetheless, even among women who used these hormones for just a few years, the risk remained elevated by 30 to 70 percent almost a decade after cessation. These results, combined with those of most (but not all) other studies of this issue, suggest that a woman who has discontinued unopposed estrogen therapy may retain a small increased risk of endometrial cancer for a long period of time.Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, the Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington Department of Biostatistics University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. This research was supported by US National Cancer Institute contracts R01 CA47749 and R35 CA39779.