Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function

The examination of diastolic filling velocities by Doppler echocardiography has provided increasing insights into the understanding of left ventricular diastolic performance in health and disease. However, several recent studies have emphasized the importance of a wide variety of physiologic variables, including heart rate, respiration, age, and loading conditions that need to be considered as potential confounding factors in the interpretation of these filling patterns. Despite this, Doppler echocardiographic assessment has been useful in the evaluation and prognostication of a variety of restrictive cardiomyopathies. Furthermore, the study of Doppler diastolic filling velocities has improved our understanding of common cardiac diseases, including hypertensive and ischemic myocardial disease. Further enhancement of our understanding of left ventricular diastolic filling in health and disease will depend on more precise elucidation of the mechanisms responsible for diastolic function.     

Doppler echocardiography for assessing left ventricular diastolic function

During the last 2 years, the use of pulsed Doppler echocardiography for assessing left ventricular diastolic function has received increased attention. This method is based on measurements derived from a waveform that reflects the velocity of blood flow through the mitral valve during ventricular filling. The technique is particularly attractive because it is noninvasive and relatively simple. Technically satisfactory recordings can be obtained in most patients. In a relatively short period, numerous studies using the Doppler technique to assess diastolic function in children and adults with cardiac disease have been published. This review appraises the current status of applications of Doppler echocardiography and critically examines the strengths, limitations, and ultimate potentials of this new method.     

组织多普勒对高血压左心室舒张功能的评估

Objective To evaluate Left ventricular(LV) diastolic function in essential hypertension by conventional pulse-wave Doppler echocardiography (cPWD) and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) and compare the two modalities. Methods Two hundred patients with essential hypertension were classified as NLVH subgroup (n = 160) and LVH subgroup (n =40) based on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) with one hundred and sixty health subjects as control group. The mitral valve flow pattern (MVFP) was obtained.Early diastolic (E) and late velocities (A) were measured and E/A was calculated. DTI was used to obtain the left ventricular lateral wall early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (Em) and E/Em was calculated.Results Essential hypertension patients had LV diastolic dysfunction both by cPWD (higher E and lower E/A ratio) and DTI (lower Em and higher E/Em ratio) compared with healthy subjects [E:(0. 88 ±0. 18)cm/s vs (0. 76 ±0. 19) cm/s;E/A ratio:0. 86 ±0. 28 vs 1.02 ±0. 38;Em: (9. 4 ±2. 8)cm/s vs (11. 9 ±3. 8)cm/s;E/Em ratio;7. 9 ± 2. 7 vs 6. 0 ± 1. 8: with all P value ＜0.01]. Em was significantly reduced and E/Em was significantly elevated in LVH subgroup than NLVH subgroup [Em; (7.7 ±2. 6) cm/s vs (9. 9 ± 2. 8) cm/s, E/Em: 9. 6 ± 3. 6 vs 7. 4 ± 2. 4, P ＜ 0. 05]. No significant difference was found in A and E/A between these two subgroups [(0. 90 ± 0. 22) cm/s vs (0. 87 ± 0. 17) cm/s; 0. 80 ± 0. 34 vs 0.88 ±0.28, P ＞ 0.05]. Conclusions cPWD and DTI both had implications to detect diastolic dysfunction in non-hypertrophic stage hypertension. Em、E/Em could be more sensitive and precise to reflect the impairment of diastolic function in the progress of hypertension.     

组织多普勒对高血压左心室舒张功能的评估

Objective To evaluate Left ventricular(LV) diastolic function in essential hypertension by conventional pulse-wave Doppler echocardiography (cPWD) and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) and compare the two modalities. Methods Two hundred patients with essential hypertension were classified as NLVH subgroup (n = 160) and LVH subgroup (n =40) based on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) with one hundred and sixty health subjects as control group. The mitral valve flow pattern (MVFP) was obtained.Early diastolic (E) and late velocities (A) were measured and E/A was calculated. DTI was used to obtain the left ventricular lateral wall early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (Em) and E/Em was calculated.Results Essential hypertension patients had LV diastolic dysfunction both by cPWD (higher E and lower E/A ratio) and DTI (lower Em and higher E/Em ratio) compared with healthy subjects [E:(0. 88 ±0. 18)cm/s vs (0. 76 ±0. 19) cm/s;E/A ratio:0. 86 ±0. 28 vs 1.02 ±0. 38;Em: (9. 4 ±2. 8)cm/s vs (11. 9 ±3. 8)cm/s;E/Em ratio;7. 9 ± 2. 7 vs 6. 0 ± 1. 8: with all P value ＜0.01]. Em was significantly reduced and E/Em was significantly elevated in LVH subgroup than NLVH subgroup [Em; (7.7 ±2. 6) cm/s vs (9. 9 ± 2. 8) cm/s, E/Em: 9. 6 ± 3. 6 vs 7. 4 ± 2. 4, P ＜ 0. 05]. No significant difference was found in A and E/A between these two subgroups [(0. 90 ± 0. 22) cm/s vs (0. 87 ± 0. 17) cm/s; 0. 80 ± 0. 34 vs 0.88 ±0.28, P ＞ 0.05]. Conclusions cPWD and DTI both had implications to detect diastolic dysfunction in non-hypertrophic stage hypertension. Em、E/Em could be more sensitive and precise to reflect the impairment of diastolic function in the progress of hypertension.     

组织多普勒对高血压左心室舒张功能的评估

目的 探讨组织多普勒评价高血压患者左心室舒张功能方面的优越性.方法 将高血压患者分为无左室肥厚亚组(160例)和左室肥厚亚组(40例),选160例健康体检者为对照组,测定舒张早、晚期二尖瓣血流速度(E、A)峰值及左室侧壁二尖瓣环舒张早期运动速度(Em).结果 左室肥厚亚组Em、E/Em变化较无左室肥厚亚组差异有统计学意义[(7.7±2.6)cm/s比(9.9 ±2.8)cm/s;9.6 ±3.6比7.4±2.4,P＜0.05],而A、E/A则差异无统计学意义[(0.90 ±0.22)cm/s比(0.87 ±0.17)cm/s;0.80 ±0.34比0.88 ±0.28,P＞0.05].结论 组织多普勒指标Em、E/Em反映左室舒张功能的变化更敏感.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate Left ventricular(LV) diastolic function in essential hypertension by conventional pulse-wave Doppler echocardiography (cPWD) and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) and compare the two modalities. Methods Two hundred patients with essential hypertension were classified as NLVH subgroup (n = 160) and LVH subgroup (n =40) based on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) with one hundred and sixty health subjects as control group. The mitral valve flow pattern (MVFP) was obtained.Early diastolic (E) and late velocities (A) were measured and E/A was calculated. DTI was used to obtain the left ventricular lateral wall early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (Em) and E/Em was calculated.Results Essential hypertension patients had LV diastolic dysfunction both by cPWD (higher E and lower E/A ratio) and DTI (lower Em and higher E/Em ratio) compared with healthy subjects [E:(0. 88 ±0. 18)cm/s vs (0. 76 ±0. 19) cm/s;E/A ratio:0. 86 ±0. 28 vs 1.02 ±0. 38;Em: (9. 4 ±2. 8)cm/s vs (11. 9 ±3. 8)cm/s;E/Em ratio;7. 9 ± 2. 7 vs 6. 0 ± 1. 8: with all P value ＜0.01]. Em was significantly reduced and E/Em was significantly elevated in LVH subgroup than NLVH subgroup [Em; (7.7 ±2. 6) cm/s vs (9. 9 ± 2. 8) cm/s, E/Em: 9. 6 ± 3. 6 vs 7. 4 ± 2. 4, P ＜ 0. 05]. No significant difference was found in A and E/A between these two subgroups [(0. 90 ± 0. 22) cm/s vs (0. 87 ± 0. 17) cm/s; 0. 80 ± 0. 34 vs 0.88 ±0.28, P ＞ 0.05]. Conclusions cPWD and DTI both had implications to detect diastolic dysfunction in non-hypertrophic stage hypertension. Em、E/Em could be more sensitive and precise to reflect the impairment of diastolic function in the progress of hypertension.     

组织多普勒对高血压左心室舒张功能的评估

Objective To evaluate Left ventricular(LV) diastolic function in essential hypertension by conventional pulse-wave Doppler echocardiography (cPWD) and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) and compare the two modalities. Methods Two hundred patients with essential hypertension were classified as NLVH subgroup (n = 160) and LVH subgroup (n =40) based on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) with one hundred and sixty health subjects as control group. The mitral valve flow pattern (MVFP) was obtained.Early diastolic (E) and late velocities (A) were measured and E/A was calculated. DTI was used to obtain the left ventricular lateral wall early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (Em) and E/Em was calculated.Results Essential hypertension patients had LV diastolic dysfunction both by cPWD (higher E and lower E/A ratio) and DTI (lower Em and higher E/Em ratio) compared with healthy subjects [E:(0. 88 ±0. 18)cm/s vs (0. 76 ±0. 19) cm/s;E/A ratio:0. 86 ±0. 28 vs 1.02 ±0. 38;Em: (9. 4 ±2. 8)cm/s vs (11. 9 ±3. 8)cm/s;E/Em ratio;7. 9 ± 2. 7 vs 6. 0 ± 1. 8: with all P value ＜0.01]. Em was significantly reduced and E/Em was significantly elevated in LVH subgroup than NLVH subgroup [Em; (7.7 ±2. 6) cm/s vs (9. 9 ± 2. 8) cm/s, E/Em: 9. 6 ± 3. 6 vs 7. 4 ± 2. 4, P ＜ 0. 05]. No significant difference was found in A and E/A between these two subgroups [(0. 90 ± 0. 22) cm/s vs (0. 87 ± 0. 17) cm/s; 0. 80 ± 0. 34 vs 0.88 ±0.28, P ＞ 0.05]. Conclusions cPWD and DTI both had implications to detect diastolic dysfunction in non-hypertrophic stage hypertension. Em、E/Em could be more sensitive and precise to reflect the impairment of diastolic function in the progress of hypertension.     

Evaluation of the left ventricular diastolic function using three-dimensional echocardiography

The aim of this study was to evaluate the left ventricular (LV) diastolic function parameter calculated using three‐dimensional (3D) echocardiography. Method: Using 3D echocardiography and an analysis software program, the left ventricular volume through the cardiac cycle was measured automatically. We therefore calculated 25%, 50%, and 75% of the subtraction end‐systolic volume (ESV) from the end‐diastolic volume (EDV). The period that the left ventricular volume reached those volumes was calculated from the ESV. Those periods divided all diastolic periods and those calculated values were named D1/4, D1/2, and D3/4, respectively. The peak‐filling rate and 1/3 filling fraction (FF) were calculated. E/A, mitral annulus velocities (E′), E/E′, ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were also measured. Results: E/A significantly correlated with D3/4. E/E′significantly correlated with the D1/4, D1/2, and 1/3 filling fraction. E′had a significantly negative correlation with the D1/4, D1/2, D3/4, and 1/3 FF. DT significantly correlated with D1/4, D1/2, D3/4, 1/3 FF, and the mean filling rate and it had a significant negative correlation with the 1/3 filling fraction. EF showed a significant positive correlation with the peak filling ratio. LVEDP demonstrated a significant correlation with D1/4 and D1/2. Conclusion: This study suggests that the LV diastolic indexes as determined by 3D echocardiography provide useful information in the clinical assessment of the diastolic LV function.     

Factors affecting parameters of left ventricular diastolic function derived from Doppler echocardiography

According to the data from left ventricular catheterization as well as M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography in 36 patients, the influence of left ventricular diameter, systolic function, systolic and diastolic filling pressures on the parameters of left ventricular diastolic function derived from Doppler echocardiography was analysed. The results indicate: (1) the left ventricular end diastolic pressure, rapid filling wave pressure and the ratio of the both significantly affect the Doppler diastolic function parameters; (2) the decrease of the ratio of early-to-late diastolic mitral flow velocities (E/A) is only a manifestation of early stage of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and the E/A ratio returns to normal (false improving) at advanced stage of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.     

多普勒超声对左室舒张压升高的评估作用

目的探讨二尖瓣口血流频谱和瓣环的组织多普勒频谱与左室平均舒张压的关系。方法将79例患者分为正常组、早期舒张功能不全组和假性正常化组,测量其二尖瓣口的血流频谱（E、A、E/A比值和E峰减速时间DT）、二尖瓣环的组织多普勒频谱（s、e、a和e/a比值）、肺静脉血流频谱（PVs、PVd）及E/e。结果与假性正常化组的E/e比值比较,显著高于其它两组（P<0.01）;与假性正常化组的左室平均舒张压（mLVDP）为（12.6±2.8）mmHg比较,显著高于早期舒张功能不全组的左室平均舒张压（6.8±1.7）mmHg（P<0.01）,E/e比值与左室平均舒张压（mLVDP）呈较好的相关性（r=0.83,P<0.01）。结论E/e比值增高对评估mLVDP升高意义较大。     

Determination of left ventricular diastolic function with pulsed Doppler echocardiography: comparison with M-mode echocardiography

Posters

Determination of left ventricular diastolic function with pulsed Doppler echocardiography: comparison with M-mode echocardiography     

The role of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function

The role of Doppler echocardiography of transmitral filling velocities in the assessment of diastolic function in man has not been adequately defined. It is now appreciated that multiple interacting factors such as loading conditions influence the transmitral velocity profile independent of intrinsic left ventricular diastolic function. Extrapolating the status of diastolic function from the transmitral velocity profile is complicated by these factors. The load dependence of ventricular filling has tempered the initial enthusiasm for the clinical application of the Doppler technique. In the present review, studies examining invasive parameters of diastolic function and Doppler indices of diastolic filling are discussed to gain greater insight and understanding of the role of Doppler echocardiography in the noninvasive assessment of diastolic function. These studies have demonstrated a relatively consistent influence of left ventricular relaxation, chamber stiffness, and left atrial pressure on the transmitral velocity filling profile. Impairment of relaxation impedes early filling and may result in a compensatory increase in atrial contribution to filling. An independent decrease in left atrial pressure from altered loading conditions may also reduce filling in early diastole. Increased left ventricular chamber stiffness (i.e., noncompliant left ventricle) impairs atrial contribution to filling and may enhance early filling. Theoretically, reduced left atrial contractility may decrease atrial contribution to filling. Pulmonic vein flow demonstrating increased retrograde flow during atrial systole helps to exclude impaired left atrial contractility. An increased left atrial pressure from altered loading conditions may also augment early filling. Therefore, an invasive or clinical assessment of left atrial pressure as being increased, decreased, or normal greatly aids in the interpretation of the transmitral filling velocity profile when inferences on the status of diastolic function are being made. Diastolic dysfunction is likely when a given pattern of filling cannot be explained on the basis of left atrial pressure. In situations where reasonable estimates on the status of left atrial pressure cannot be done, striking alterations in the transmitral velocity filling profile may be useful.     

Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in acute hypothyroidism

OBJECTIVE Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction Is an important cause of symptomatic heart failure. Previous studies suggest that thyroid dysfunction affects left ventricular diastolic function but the underlying mechanisms remain controversial. The study was undertaken to assess the influence of acute hypothyroidism on left ventricular diastolic function and to elucidate possible underlying mechanisms by means of Doppler echocardiography in a group of athyreotic patients, whose thyroid state depended only on external thyroid hormone supply and could therefore easily be controlled. PATIENTS Eleven patients (5 men, 6 women, aged 20-55 years), who had had total thyroidectomy, were investigated during mild hyperthyroidism and during acute hypothyroidism. Additionally, 11 healthy control subjects aged 25-51 years were included in the study. DESIGN M-mode echocardiography of the left ventricle and pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography of the trans-mitral flow velocity pattern were carried out. RESULTS Acute hypothyroidism produced a decrease of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter from 48 ± 5 to 46 ± 5 mm (mean ± SD P < 0.05), of peak velocity of early diastolic filling from 0.52 ± 0.10 to 0.42 ± 0.05 m/s (P < 0.05), of peak velocity of late diastolic filling from 0.42 ± 0.10 to 0.36 ± 0.09 m/s (P < 0.05), and a decreased time-velocity integral of early diastolic filling (6 2 ± 1 8 vs 5.1 ± 0.7 cm, P < 0.05). The other M-mode and Doppler echocardiographic parameters did not differ between the hyperthyroid and the hypothyroid states. CONCLUSIONS The observed changes of the transmitral flow velocity pattern during acute hypothyroidism can be attributed to a reduction of pre-load. There is no direct evidence that acute hypothyroidism affects the intrinsic diastolic properties of the left ventricle.     

Tissue Doppler imaging in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Describe the rationale behind, and clinical use of, tissue Doppler (TD) imaging in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function, with a focus on recent developments. RECENT FINDINGS: Tissue Doppler imaging is a novel echocardiographic technique that directly measures myocardial velocities. Systolic TD measurements assess left and right ventricular myocardial contractile function. Diastolic TD values reflect myocardial relaxation, and in combination with conventional Doppler measurements, ratios (E/Ea) have been developed to estimate LV filling pressures. TD values and derived ratios have been demonstrated to be valuable in the diagnosis of elevated LV filling pressures, clinical congestive heart failure (CHF), and the prognosis of patients with cardiac disease and CHF. New TD indices have now been developed to assess myocardial relaxation and LV filling pressures, and the impact of LV systolic function on the use of TD imaging has recently been described. TD echocardiography is being used in an ever-widening group of patients for the assessment of LV diastolic function, and its correlation to, and comparison with, B-type natriuretic peptide is an active area of current investigation. SUMMARY: This review focuses on new developments in the clinical use of TD echocardiography in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function.     

超声心动图评价左心室舒张功能

左心室舒张功能（left ventricular diastolic funclion,LVDF）指左心室收缩后恢复到前一次舒张末期容量和压力的能力.近年来,左心室舒张功能不全受到越来越多的关注,舒张功能不全可单独存在,亦可与收缩功能障碍并存,且在多种疾病过程中常先于收缩功能障碍出现.据统计,在充血性心力衰竭（congestive heart failure,CHF）患者当中,约1/3主要为舒张性心衰,且研究发现舒张性心衰患者的预后要比收缩性心衰患者更差[1],因此,正确识别和评价左心室舒张功能不全具有重要的临床意义.     

Doppler echocardiography evaluation of left ventricular function in intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation

Doppler-echocardiographic measurement of transaortic and mitral flow allows an assessment of systolic and diastolic left ventricular performance. To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) 10 patients were examined during IABP after myocardial infarction or cardiothoracic surgery. Doppler echocardiographic transaortic (VAo), early (VE) and late (VA) transmitral flow velocities, transaortic velocity time integral (VTIAo), acceleration and deceleration intervals and rates were obtained. The IABP augmentation was changed from 1:1, 1:2 to 1:4 causing no notable change in invasively measured arterial pressures (p greater than 0.05). With constant heart rate the VE/VA ratio was similar in 1:2 and 1:1 mode (1.44 +/- 0.42 vs 1.47 +/- 0.27; p greater than 0.2), whereas VAo and VTIAo were increased (p less than 0.01). A beat-to-beat analysis during 1:2 mode confirmed an increase in VAo (84.1 +/- 13.5 vs 98.3 +/- 16.5 cm/s; p less than 0.01) and VTIAo after the augmenting balloon inflation, but did not confirm any concomitant effect on diastolic transmitral parameters; acceleration and deceleration intervals were not changed. Thus, Doppler-echocardiography was able to detect an increase in transaortic flow during IABP augmentation by beat-to-beat analysis. The increase in VTIAo indicates an elevated cardiac output. A similar instantaneous effect on the diastolic transmitral flow could not be identified.     

A new Doppler echocardiography parameter of diastolic ventricular function

The evaluation of flow velocities in left ventricular inflow tract (LVIT) by Doppler echocardiography gives information about the diastolic ventricular function. In late diastole, shortly after the flow velocity of atrial contraction V(A), we notice in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) a laminar flow velocity directed to the aortic valve. The purpose of this study was to compare this flow velocity V(A*) in the LVOT with the flow velocity of the atrial contraction V(A), and the flow velocity of early diastole V(E) in LVIT, to determine whether such comparison would provide information concerning diastolic function. We studied three groups: 39 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (HY) (mean age 56 +/- 12 y, 77% male), 41 patients with coronary heart disease (KHK) (mean age 53 +/- 10 y, 85% male) and 41 healthy subjects (N) (mean age 50 +/- 16 y, 51% male); all three groups were studied by pulsed Doppler from apical 4 chamber view in LVOT for maximal velocity (Vmax-A*) and time velocity integral of A* (TVI-A*), and in LVIT for maximal velocity of early diastole (Vmax-E), maximal velocity of atrial contraction (Vmax-A), ratio Vmax-E/Vmax-A, and the time velocity integrals (TVI-E, TVI-A). A slight correlation between Vmax-A* and Vmax-A was found (r = .60), being nearly the same as for TVI-A* and TVI-A (r = .64).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in young alcoholics

M-mode echo recordings of the left ventricle and left ventricular inflow Doppler velocimetry were performed in 34 male alcoholics below age 45 and in 25 nonalcoholic male controls. Groups were well matched for age, body surface area and heart rate. Systolic arterial pressure was slightly higher in alcoholics and none of the subjects studied had cardiorespiratory symptoms. Data from imaging echocardiography (M-mode echo) were comparable in both groups, and fractional shortening, reflecting left ventricular systolic performance, was identical. Left ventricular inflow Doppler velocimetry showed quite different results in alcoholics and control subjects for the early diastolic flow velocity peak (0.52 +/- 0.12 versus 0.61 +/- 0.11 m/s; p less than 0.01) and in peak flow velocities in the atrial contraction phase (0.32 +/- 0.11 versus 0.27 +/- 0.06 m/s; p less than 0.05). The lower ratio of both velocities in patients (1.88 +/- 0.95 versus 2.34 +/- 0.60 m/s; p less than 0.05) suggests that left ventricular distensibility is altered in alcoholics. In addition, isovolumetric relaxation period, reflecting an early diastolic event, was slightly but significantly prolonged in alcoholic subjects (68 +/- 14 versus 56 +/- 10 ms; p less than 0.001). It is concluded that diastolic performance is altered in young alcoholics without cardiorespiratory symptoms showing normal systolic performance, and that these alterations may be an early marker of alcoholic cardiomyopathy.