Effectiveness of Madopar HBS plus Madopar standard in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease: two years of follow-up

Clinical response to a new galenic formulation of levodopa plus benserazide, Madopar HBS, was studied in 25 fluctuating parkinsonians. This open study was planned in two phases. In the first phase, the administering of HBS alone resulted in a surprisingly high number of dropouts. In the second phase, Madopar standard in association with Madopar HBS, the follow-up period was 24 months. A stable long-lasting improvement in predictable fluctuations and their severity was maintained for the whole period without any change in drug dose. Nocturnal and early morning akinesia improved too. The study shows that Madopar HBS plus Madopar standard is effective in producing a prolonged and stable response in parkinsonian fluctuating patients.     

A controlled release form of Madopar in Parkinsonian patients with advanced disease and marked fluctuations in motor performance

Flucuations in motor performance is a major problem in long-term levodopa treatment of Parkinsonian patients. A slow release preparation of levodopa with benserazide, Madopar HBS, has been developed in an attempt to decrease this problem. Eleven of 22 Parkinsonian patients with advanced disease and marked fluctuations experienced long-lasting benefit with reduction of their fluctuations in motor performance on treatment with Madopar HBS; 11 dropped out within the first 5 months of the trial. This was probably due to lack of experience with the effect of this new slow-release formulation. Nine patients (82%) required an additional dose of standard Madopar, especially in the morning. Significant improvements were found for akinetic phenomenon and dystonic cramps, and with the global evaluation of motor fluctuations. The occurrence of peak dose dyskinesia remained unchanged. No abnormalities in laboratory values were found.     

Open study of sustained-release formulation of levodopa and benserazide in parkinsonian patients

The efficacy of a novel oral sustained-release preparation of levodopa/benserazide (Madopar HBS) was compared to that of previous conventional levodopa/benserazide treatment in 15 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease and with severe fluctuations in motor response to long-term levodopa therapy. In ten patients who suffered from clear-cut "end-of-dose" deterioration, significant benefit was obtained on HBS form, while 5 patients did not respond well to the new levodopa preparation. Plasma levels of levodopa were more stable with HBS compared to conventional levodopa preparation in our patients, although doses of HBS form required for an optimal response averaged 1.48 times that of previous conventional levodopa.     

Sustained-release Madopar HBS® compared with standard Madopar® in the long-term treatment of de novo parkinsonian patients

In this Danish-Norwegian randomized double-blind parallel-group multicentre study, we compared the therapeutic response of slow-release Madopar HBS® to standard Madopar® in 134 de novo patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease during a 5-year period. The drugs were dosed according to the individual need of the patients. The Webster, NUDS, UPDRS and Hoehn & Yahr scales were used for evaluation of symptoms. Addition of a morning dose of standard Madopar 62.5 mg was allowed after 6 months. Bromocriptine could be administered but not Selegiline. Sixty-five patients got Madopar HBS and 69 standard Madopar. Surprisingly, no differences were found as to the mean daily levodopa dose, the mean number of daily doses or the use of and doses of bromocriptine. Unexpectedly, we found a trend towards a more frequent use of a morning dose of standard Madopar in the group treated with the standard formulation. No differences were observed in the occurrence of motor fluctuations or dyskinesia, the incidence of which was relatively low. Sustained-release Madopar (HBS) thus proved to be as effective as standard Madopar in the long-term treatment of de novo parkinsonian patients, but the drug showed no advantage in postponing or reducing the long-term levodopa treatment problems.     

A double-blind, cross-over trial with madopar HBS in patients with Parkinson's disease

Fourteen patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations were given 125 mg of Madopar HBS or placebo twice a day in addition to their optimal standard Madopar treatment in a double-blind, cross-over study. Clinical response was evaluated by the King's College Hospital Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, the Mobility in Bed Scale and self-scoring diaries. A significant improvement with the drug was found according to the rating scales, whereas evaluation by self-scoring diaries showed no significant changes. In three patients we observed worsening of abnormal involuntary movements. The present trial suggests that a low dose of Madopar HBS can be useful in addition to levodopa therapy in some patients on long-term treatment.     

Madopar HBS in fluctuating parkinsonian patients: two-year treatment

In an open-label study, we substituted conventional levodopa plus benserazide: 100/25 (Madopar) with a controlled-release form (HBS) in 18 fluctuating parkinsonian patients for 24 months. Significantly positive results were obtained in both peak-dose and diphasic dyskinesias up to 12 months of treatment; morning akinesias were also improved up to 6 months. A general trend of deterioration, compared to the first 3-6 months of HBS treatment, was observed in "off" fluctuations after 1 year: akinesias due to a delayed response worsened after 1 year of treatment also when compared with the conventional treatment. Positive results were obtained with new HBS on standard Madopar-related psychiatric disorders.     

Comparative single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa following a new dual-release and a conventional slow-release formulation of levodopa and benserazide in healthy volunteers

The objective was to assess the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa following administration of a new dual-release and conventional slow-release formulation of levodopa/benserazide in the dose ratio of 4:1. In an open-label, two-way cross-over study, 20 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive first either Madopar DR or Madopar HBS for 8 days. Then they crossed over to the other formulation. A first dose of 200 mg levodopa and 50 mg benserazide ('250' mg) was given on day 1, '125' mg t.i.d. on the subsequent 6 days (days 2-7), followed by '250' mg on day 8. The two treatment periods of 8 days were separated by a wash-out period of at least 7 days. Blood samples were taken at specific times over a 12-hour period (day 1) or a 36-hour period (day 8). Plasma concentrations of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography for pharmacokinetic evaluation. The pharmacokinetics of levodopa after a single-dose administration (day 1) of Madopar DR and Madopar HBS were significantly different as reflected by the respective mean values of maximum plasma concentration (C(max) 1.99 vs. 0.82 mg x l-1), time to reach maximum concentration (t(max) 0.7 vs. 2.6 h) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0- infinity ) 4.52 vs. 3.18 mg x h x l-1). The respective values after multiple doses (day 8) were: C(max) 1.98 vs. 0.93 mg x l-1, t(max) 0.7 vs. 2.3 h and AUC(0-infinity ) 4.84 vs. 3.96 mg x h x l-1. The relative bioavailability (Madopar DR vs. Madopar HBS) was 1.73 on day 1 and 1.32 on day 8. Bioequivalence could not be demonstrated for log-transformed data of AUC and C(max) within a predefined range of 80-125 and 70-143%, respectively. In conclusion, the observed differences in C(max), t(max) and AUC are consistent with a faster rate and higher extent of levodopa absorption after administration of Madopar DR. Statistical evaluation of these kinetic data showed that Madopar DR is not bioequivalent to Madopar HBS.     

Controlled-release levodopa/benserazide (Madopar HBS): clinical observations and levodopa and dopamine plasma concentrations in fluctuating parkinsonian patients

Summary In five levodopa (l-dopa)-treated patients with Parkinson's disease with severe fluctuations of motor performance, plasma l-dopa as well as dopamine levels were measured during 2 days, first under optimal standard l-dopa with peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor (PDI) and then after a dose adjustment period using slow-release l-dopa/benserazide (Madopar HBS) in an open inpatient trial. Three patients benefited from the slow-release preparation; two patients deteriorated with a tendency to have an unpredictable response, a delay to turn on with the first dose in the morning, as well as an increase in dyskinesia corresponding to l-dopa cumulation during the day. These problems were subsequently also seen during the follow-up period of 1 year in those patients who benefited from Madopar HBS as inpatients. This might indicate that patient compliance is more difficult with the new formulation. After 1 year all patients had returned to their previous standard l-dopa/PDI treatment. l-Dopa levels continued to fluctuate, but to a lesser degree with Madopar HBS. The equivalent l-dopa dosage had to be increased by 56% (29–100%) with Madopar HBS while mean dopamine levels increased in four patients (by 47–257%) without the occurrence of peripheral side-effects. This implies that with the new formulation more l-dopa is metabolized to dopamine and explains the necessity to increase the equivalent l-dopa dosage.     

A comparison of the effects of controlled-release levodopa (Madopar CR) with conventional levodopa in late Parkinson''s disease.

In this multicentre study a controlled-release formulation of levodopa and the decarboxylase inhibitor benserazide (Madopar CR) was evaluated in patients with Parkinson's disease exhibiting dose-related fluctuations in motor performance in response to conventional levodopa preparations. The effect of Madopar CR, with or without conventional levodopa/benserazide, on the proportion of time spent "on", "off" or "intermediate" was compared with that of previous conventional levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor therapy. Evaluation of the two periods of optimum therapy was based on both patient diary data and investigator opinion. Forty seven patients completed the study but full patient diaries were available for only 37. The mean optimum total daily dosage of conventional Madopar was 820 mg taken in a mean of 6.4 doses, compared with a mean optimum daily dosage of combined Madopar CR and conventional Madopar of 1088 mg, taken in a mean of 5.2 doses. Conventional Madopar was taken in addition to Madopar CR in all but eight patients. Madopar CR was felt to be advantageous in 83% and disadvantageous in 11% of patients completing the study. Considering the 37 patients for whom diary data were available, Madopar CR therapy resulted in an increase in the mean time spent "on" (p = 0.016) and a decrease in the mean time spent "off" (p = 0.029) compared with conventional Madopar alone. Individually 25 out of 37 had an increase in "on" time and 19 out of 37 experienced a decrease in "off" time. Thus Madopar CR was found to be beneficial in a significant proportion of patients experiencing fluctuations in response to conventional levodopa.     

Antiparkinsonian activity of CY 208-243, a partial D-1 dopamine receptor agonist, in MPTP-treated marmosets and patients with Parkinson's disease

The effect of stimulation of cerebral dopamine D-1 receptors by CY 208-243 on motor disability was tested in MPTP-treated parkinsonian marmosets and patients with Parkinson's disease. CY 208-243 (0.5-1.25 mg/kg s.c.) produced a dose-related reversal of akinesia and rigidity in the marmosets, lasting some 2 h. Single morning doses of CY 208-243 (5-40 mg) were compared with the usual morning dose of levodopa in eight patients with Parkinson's disease on long-term levodopa therapy who had developed motor fluctuations from immobility with akinesia and rigidity (off) to mobility often with dyskinesias (on). CY 208-243 alone was capable of switching such patients from off to on; five of the eight patients responded to the highest dose (40 mg), sometimes with dyskinesias. The response to CY 208-243 was comparable to that produced by levodopa in these cases. Drugs designed to stimulate both dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the brain may improve the therapy of Parkinson's disease.     

Madopar HBS and the decompensated phase of Parkinson disease

The most important current problem in the treatment of Parkinson disease in the so-called L-dopa long-term-treatment syndrome. We present here the results of our experience with Madopar HBS in the treatment of two groups of patients suffering from L-dopa long-term treatment syndrome. In the first study we replaced the standard Madopar with Madopar HBS. In the second study, after identifying the most disabling “off” periods, we added Madopar HBS to the previous treatment in such a way as to control these “off” phases. Our study suggests that Madopar HBS is useful in reducing typical fluctuation phenomena in the majority of patients.

---

Sommario Attualmente il problema più importante nel trattamento del morbo di Parkinson è costituito dalla cosiddetta “sindrome da trattamento cronico con L-dopa”. Presentiamo qui di seguito i risultati della nostra esperienza con Madopar HBS nel trattamento di 2 gruppi di pazienti affetti da tale sindrome. Nella prima parte dello studio abbiamo sostituito del tutto il Madopar standard con Madopar HBS, nella seconda parte, dopo aver identificato il periodo “off” maggiormente invalidante, abbiamo aggiunto Madopar HBS al trattamento precedente in modo che fosse efficace sulla fase off così identificata. Il nostro lavoro suggerisce che il Madopar HBS è utile nel ridurre le fluttuazioni motorie nella maggioranza dei pazienti parkinsoniani.

     

Growth hormone and prolactin stimulation by Madopar in Parkinson's disease

Madopar, a combination of levodopa with benserazide, induced an inconsistent rise in plasma growth hormone in unmedicated patients with Parkinson's disease and in controls, and a greater growth hormone rise in Parkinsonian subjects on chronic Madopar therapy. In subjects on chronic therapy with levodopa and carbidopa (Sinemet), the growth hormone releasing effect of Madopar was blunted. Madopar increased plasma prolactin (PRL) in controls, unmedicated patients and patients on Madopar therapy while in patients on Sinemet therapy the PRL-releasing effect of Madopar was strikingly reduced. Since these data were interpreted as due to a defective dopamine tone in the hypothalamus of Parkinsonian subjects on Madopar but not Sinemet therapy, a direct dopamine receptor agonist, lisuride was administered. Lisuride, however, elicited a blunted growth hormone response both in patients on Madopar and Sinemet therapy, without revealing a state of supersensitivity of dopamine receptors for growth hormone control in Parkinsonian subjects on Madopar therapy. No difference was present in the PRL-lowering effect of lisuride in the different experimental groups. These findings suggest that: (1) hypothalamic dopamine function is impaired in Parkinsonian subjects on Madopar therapy, preserved in unmedicated patients and enhanced in patients on Sinemet therapy; (2) the endocrine effects observed in Parkinsonian subjects on chronic Madopar therapy may be due to some penetration of benserazide across the blood brain barrier in the region of the hypothalamus; (3) since Madopar and Sinemet are in essence equally effective antiparkinsonian remedies, penetration of benserazide does not occur across the blood brain barrier surrounding the nigrostriatal system.     

Deprenyl (selegiline) in combination treatment of Parkinson's disease

ABSTRACT — Long-term treatment of parkinsonian patients with levodopa (plus decarboxylase inhibitor) leads to decreasing levodopa efficacy and increasing side-effects. Then main therapeutic problems are on-off phenomena, end-of-dose akinesia and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Deprenyl, a selective MAO-B inhibitor, has produced good therapeutic effects in combination either with levodopa alone or with levodopa plus decarboxylase inhibitor in the treatment of end-of-dose akinesia and on-off phenomena.
In an open trial with 48 parkinsonian patients deprenyl was added to previous levodopa plus decarboxylase-inhibitor therapy. Good effects were achieved in respect of mild on-off phenomena and end-of-dose akinesia, minor success in the alleviation of dyskinesia and depression. In four further patients with a post-traumatic parkinsonian syndrome, no improvement of rigidospasticity and vigilance was demonstrable.     

The occurrence of motor fluctuations in parkinsonian patients treated long term with levodopa: role of early treatment and disease progression

The aim of this study is to evaluate what factors influence the risk of occurrence of motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with particular reference to the role of early or delayed introduction of levodopa therapy during the course of the disease. One hundred twenty-five consecutive newly diagnosed patients with PD started levodopa treatment at the time diagnosis and were followed for 2 to 10 years. During follow-up, 60 patients had wearing-off or early morning akinesia. We estimated the cumulative time-dependent risk of motor fluctuation occurrence through a multivariable analysis. The risk was lower for patients with tremor-predominant PD, for those with shorter disease duration prior to levodopa, and for those who were relatively older at levodopa initiation. Our results suggest that, as far as motor fluctuations are concerned, disease prognosis is not influenced by early levodopa treatment. These observation support the introduction of levodopa as soon as there is a subjective need for the patients to maintain their level of social and work performance.     

Bromocriptine alone or associated with L-dopa plus benserazide in Parkinson''s disease.

Twenty-six patients affected by Parkinson's disease were treated with a 2-Br-alpha-ergocriptine (CB 154): 14 cases were given CB 154 alone, and 12 were given CB 154 along with L-dopa plus benserazide (Madopar). Both CB 154 and combined therapy (CB 154+Madopar) induced a significant improvement in total disability score, tremor, rigidity, akinesia, self-sufficiency, and some motor performance tests (dynamic tests). No significant difference was found between results obtained with CB 154 therapy and with Madopar treatment, while the improvement induced by combined therapy (CB 154+Madopar) was significantly higher than that obtained by Madopar alone. The averse reactions caused by CB 154 alone or associated with Madopar are similar to those observed during other dopaminergic treatment. CB 154 alone or combined with Madopar appears to be a useful advance in the management of Parkinson's disease.     

Comparative efficacy of two oral sustained-release preparations of L-dopa in fluctuating Parkinson's disease. Preliminary findings in 20 patients

Summary 20 patients with Parkinson's disease and a fluctuating response to chronic treatment with conventional L-dopa preparations participated in an open randomized trial comparing two sustained-release L-dopa preparations (Madopar HBS, Sinemet CR4). While a majority (15 patients, 7 on Madopar HBS and 8 on Sinemet CR4) showed a favourable response after 2 months of slow-release L-dopa treatment the clinical benefit remained stable in only 2 patients on Madopar HBS and 3 patients on Sinemet CR4 over the entire follow-up period of 12 months. Reasons for treatment failure were increased peak-dose or biphasic dyskinesias or prolonged off-periods. This preliminary study failed to demonstrate clinically significant advantages of one slow-release principle over the other.     

Influence of meal ingestion time on pharmacokinetics of orally administered levodopa in parkinsonian patients

The influence of meal ingestion time on rate and extent of oral levodopa absorption was evaluated in a group of 17 patients, after administration of their usual second daily dose of levodopa plus carbidopa (Sinemet 10:1) or benserazide (Madopar 4:1). Standard meals were consumed by the patients after they had fasted 15-17 h, on one occasion 30 min before ingestion of the levodopa "study dose" and, at another time, 2 h after ingestion of the same dose. This study dose, ranging from 50 to 250 mg levodopa, was given to the patients at 11 a.m., 4 h after their first morning dose. Time to peak plasma levodopa concentration increased threefold (from 45 +/- 23 to 134 +/- 76 min, p less than 0.001), when levodopa was administered after meals. Area under the 6-h plasma concentration-time curve for levodopa was decreased in 10 subjects, unchanged in three and higher in four after ingestion of meals, the latter finding probably resulting from an erratic absorption even at fasting. On the whole, levodopa absorption proved significantly lower (p less than 0.01), on the average 15%. Similarly, peak plasma levodopa concentrations were lower in 12 patients, unchanged in two, and higher in three, with an overall significant decrease (p less than 0.001) of 30% on the average. The data confirm the importance of meal ingestion time in relation to levodopa dose as a determinant of drug absorption.     

Controlled release levodopa-carbidopa (CR-5) in the management of parkinsonian motor fluctuations

Parkinsonian patients receiving long-term levodopa-carbidopa (Sinemet) therapy often develop fluctuations in motor performance. Although maintenance of stable levels of plasma levodopa by means of its continuous intravenous infusion diminishes these fluctuations, practical limitations attending this therapeutic approach have prompted continuing attempts to develop oral controlled release levodopa-carbidopa formulations. In a double-blind, crossover clinical trial, one such preparation, CR-5 (Merck, Sharp & Dohme), produced significantly less plasma levodopa variations and substantially improved motor performance over Sinemet in 15 patients with mild to moderate fluctuations, all but one of whom chose to continue on CR-5 therapy after the study. Eight patients with severe motor fluctuations could not adjust to this preparation during the open phase and consequently withdrew from the study. Subjectively, most patients noted the convenience of less frequent dosing, improved sleep, and the amelioration of early morning akinesia and dystonia.     

Levodopa dose-related fluctuations in presumed olivopontocerebellar atrophy

The parkinsonism that occurs in some patients with olivopontocerebellar atrophy (OPCA) can cause diagnostic confusion with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD). The response to levodopa is usually a distinguishing feature, the OPCAs either failing to benefit or losing efficacy relatively quickly. A fluctuating response to levodopa in those OPCA patients who do benefit has not been emphasized in the literature previously. Reported here are three patients with presumed OPCA, dominated by parkinsonian features, who eventually developed typical fluctuations with morning akinesia, wearing off, and periodic lack of response related to meals. These fluctuations were a major source of disability and an important reason for diagnostic confusion with IPD. The possible mechanisms of these fluctuations are discussed.     

Selegiline in the treatment of daily fluctuations in disability of parkinsonian patients with long-term levodopa treatment

Abstract– In order to evaluate in a double-blind manner the therapeutic efficacy of selegiline in the treatment of late-phase Parkinson's disease, 19 patients with end-of-dose type fluctuations were randomized for a double-blind cross-over trial receiving either selegiline 10 mg or placebo. Each period lasted 12 weeks. During a two week prestudy period the dose of levodopa was titrated to optimal levels. The disability was evaluated using the Columbia University Disability Scale (CUDS). The patients kept a daily diary to monitor closely the frequency and severity of their fluctuations and the side-effects of treatment. Their parkinsonian disability and all main symptoms improved significantly during selegiline treatment. The mean duration of action of a levodopa dose was significantly longer and there was significantly less daily end-of-dose and early morning akinesia during selegiline treatment. The side-effects were similar in both treatments. This double-blind study confirms the findings of earlier open studies that selegiline potentiates and prolongs the therapeutic effects of levodopa and thus its use is particularly beneficial in patients with end-of-dose type fluctuations in disability.