改良Kidner术治疗足副舟骨综合征

目的 探讨改良Kidner术治疗足副舟骨综合征(ANS)的临床疗效.方法 采用改良Kidner术治疗25例ANS患者.采用AOFAS中足评分、疼痛VAS评分、跟骨倾斜角、距骨第1跖骨角和距舟关节覆盖角进行疗效评估.结果 患者均获得随访,时间16～48个月.1例术后自觉患足提踵无力,经3个月提踵和功能锻炼后症状得以改善....     

足副舟骨疼痛综合征继发ⅡA期胫后肌肌腱功能不全的手术治疗

[目的]探讨足副舟骨疼痛综合征继发ⅡA期胫后肌肌腱功能不全的手术治疗.[方法] 2005年10月～2010年2月,对16例足副舟骨疼痛综合征继发ⅡA期胫后肌肌腱功能不全的患者施行副舟骨切除+趾((躅))长屈肌腱转移术.男5例,女11例;年龄15 ～27岁,平均23.5岁.右足7例,左足9例.Ⅰ型副舟骨4例,Ⅱ型副舟骨9例,Ⅲ型副舟骨3例,发病至手术时间为6～24个月,平均8.5个月.所有患者均根据美国足踝外科协会(american orthopodics foot and ankle society,AOFAS)的足与踝关节评分法进行术前、术后相关评估.[结果]术后16例获随访12 ～66个月,平均28.6个月.手术前后负重位X线片测量相关特异性指标,手术前后比较差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.01).其中侧位距跟角平均减少9.6°,前后位距跟角平均减少8.8°,侧位第1跖距角平均减少11.9°,跟骨倾斜角平均增加7.4°,距舟覆盖角平均减少5.4°.AOFAS(ankle - hindfoot scale)评分:总评术前为(48.26±2.08)分,术后为(84.56±1.86)分.其中疼痛指数:术前为12.57 ±2.06,术后为37.50±2.48;足踝关节功能指数:术前为23.32±2.81,术后为38.60±1.69;踝-后足对线指数:术前为4.60±0.6,术后为7.40±1.06.手术前后比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).特别是在缓解足和踝部疲劳感、疼痛及正常穿鞋方面改善明显.[结论]足副舟骨疼痛综合征继发ⅡA期胫后肌肌腱功能不全的患者施行副舟骨切除+趾((躅))长屈肌腱转移术,短期效果良好,但远期疗效有待于临床进一步观察.     

副舟骨切除结合胫后肌腱止点前置重建治疗副舟骨源性平足症

目的探讨副舟骨切除结合胫后肌腱止点前置重建治疗副舟骨源性平足症的方法及临床疗效。方法 2006年5月-2011年6月,收治33例(40足)经6个月以上保守治疗无效的副舟骨源性平足症患者。男14例(17足),女19例(23足);年龄16～56岁,平均30.1岁。均有双侧副舟骨,其中单侧发病26例,双侧7例。出现平足症状至入院时间为7个月～9年,中位时间24个月。中足功能采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分标准评定为(47.9±7.3)分。X线片检查示,均有足部Ⅱ型副舟骨,足弓高度不同程度丢失,均伴后足轻度畸形。术中切除副舟骨,行胫后肌腱止点前置带线锚钉重建术治疗。结果术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无相关并发症发生。术后30例(36足)患者获随访,随访时间6～54个月,平均23个月。患者术后6个月足部疼痛均消失,足部外观明显改善。末次随访时中足功能AOFAS评分为(90.4±2.0)分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(t=29.73,P=0.00)。X线片检查,均无内固定锚钉松动、断裂等发生;足弓高度、跟骨倾斜角、跟距角及距骨-第1跖骨角与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论采用副舟骨切除结合胫后肌腱止点前置重建治疗副舟骨源性平足症可有效纠正平足畸形,足功能恢复好,并发症少。     

足副舟骨痛及其手术治疗

足副舟骨痛及其手术治疗王东来，黄士中，合润基足副舟骨是常见的足部解剖变异，常可引起足底疲劳感和疼痛，临床上往往不被重视。本文报告副舟骨切除术治疗足副舟骨痛２１例，结合足弓解剖学和生物力学特点，探讨了足副舟骨痛的机制和手术要点１临床资料一般资料：１９８...     

单纯副舟骨切除术治疗足副舟骨疼痛综合征疗效观察

目的观察及评价单纯副舟骨切除术治疗足副舟骨疼痛综合征的临床疗效。方法对27例足副舟骨疼痛综合征患者33足采用单纯副舟骨切除术治疗,术后佩戴内翻位支具2周扶双拐不负重活动。随访评估患者症状缓解程度及活动恢复情况。结果患者住院时间2～5 d,无切口感染。27例均获随访,时间3～19个月。症状完全消失27足,症状大部分缓解6足。结论单纯副舟骨切除术治疗足副舟骨疼痛综合征,对胫后肌腱损伤小,不干扰足底内侧纵弓,住院时间短,术后无须长期制动,临床效果好。     

副舟骨融合术治疗成人Ⅱ型痛性足副舟骨临床疗效分析

目的：探讨副舟骨融合术治疗成年人Ⅱ型痛性足副舟骨的临床疗效.方法：2006年6月至2012年6月,采用副舟骨融合手术治疗35例（38足）成人Ⅱ型痛性足副舟骨患者,其中男26例,女9例;年龄18～44岁,平均（32.4±7.3）岁;病程3～10个月.记录患者围手术期并发症,测量影像学数据,并采用美国足踝外科协会AOFAS（American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS）评分对足功能进行评价,采用疼痛视觉模拟评分（visual analogue score,VAS）对疼痛缓解程度进行评价.结果：术后除2例发生切口浅表感染外,无明显围手术期并发症发生.35例患者全部获随访,时间12～84个月,平均（53.5±14.7）个月.32例（35足）患者达到影像学愈合,术后愈合时间9～18周,平均（13.7±2.3）周.VAS疼痛评分较术前明显改善（x2=12.14,P＜0.01）.手术前后距骨第1跖骨角[（9.4±3.5）°vs （8.3±2.7）°,t=0.736,P＞0.05],跟骨倾斜角[（17.7±2.2）°vs（18.9±3.4）°,t=0.794,P＞0.05],距舟覆盖角[（14.3±3.4）°vs （12.5±4.6）°,t=0.947,P＞0.05]及第1跖楔关节高度[（14.8±3.1）mmvs （15.9±2.8） mm,t=0.814,P＞0.05]比较差异无统计学意义.术后AOFAS评分较术前明显提高（45.6±5.3 vs 82.5±7.4,t=3.214,P＜0.01）.结论：对于保守治疗失败的成人Ⅱ型痛性足副舟骨,当副舟骨骨块较大,不伴有僵硬性扁平足时,副舟骨融合术可以有效缓解疼痛症状,提高患足功能,术后患者满意度高,手术疗效确实.     

疼痛性副舟骨的手术治疗16例分析

[目的] 探讨疼痛性副舟骨的手术治疗方式并评价其疗效.[方法] 对经手术治疗的16例疼痛性副舟骨患者进行回顾性分析,男13例,女3例;年龄13～37岁,平均22岁.其中10例采用传统的Kindner手术方式,6例采用副舟骨融合内固定术,并根据症状和体征进行临床疗效评价.[结果] 15例获得随访,随访时间为8个月～2.8年,平均1.5年.根据Maryland足部评定标准,优13例,良1例,可1例.[结论] 术前掌握疼痛性副舟骨的分型方法,选择合适的手术方式,术中精细操作才能取得良好疗效.     

副舟骨切除加胫后肌腱转位术在合并扁平足的副舟骨疼痛综合征中的临床应用

目的 探讨副舟骨切除加胫后肌腱转位术在治疗合并扁平足的副舟骨疼痛综合征中的临床疗效.方法 对21例经半年以上保守治疗无效的合并扁平足的副舟骨疼痛综合征患者行副舟骨切除加胫后肌腱转位术.结果 术后随访19例,时间6～30个月.患者疼痛症状明显好转,足部外观改善.应用Maryland足部评分标准,由术前平均(57.6±6.8)分提高至术后平均(84.2±5.1)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 副舟骨切除加胫后肌腱转位术治疗合并扁平足的副舟骨疼痛综合征近期疗效明显.     

痛性足副舟骨诊断和治疗进展

足副舟骨是一种先天性畸形,其与扁平足的关系仍存在争议.痛性足副舟骨患者最常见主诉为中足内侧疼痛和触痛,查体可见足舟骨内侧肿胀、压痛等.足正侧位X线片及足外侧45°斜位片为首选影像学检查方法,锝骨扫描技术敏感性高而特异性差,MRI诊断具有最高的敏感性和特异性.对痛性足副舟骨患者一般先采取保守治疗(穿宽松舒适鞋子、理疗等)...     

Osteonecrosis of the accessory navicular bone

A case of osteonecrosis of the accessory navicular bone is reported. This entity should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of painful accessory navicular. Received: 20 October 2000     

副舟骨源性平足症的手术治疗策略

副舟骨源性平足症是临床常见的足部畸形之一,目前其治疗方法存在较多争议,不同手术方法临床疗效差异较大,针对副舟骨源性平足症的外科治疗尚无统一标准,围绕副舟骨切除后如何重塑足弓产生了一系列手术方法,不同术式产生的临床疗效亦不尽相同,如何制定手术策略,选择手术方式,以及副舟骨切除后是否需要重建胫后肌腱,如何重建,采用何种方式重建等问题是目前研究的热点和难点,期待更进一步的研究。     

副舟骨切除胫后肌腱止点重建跟骨内移截骨术治疗与副舟骨相关的平足症

 目的 探讨副舟骨切除胫后肌腱止点重建跟骨内移截骨术治疗与副舟骨相关的平足症的临床疗效。方法 2009年3月至2011年10月,采用副舟骨切除胫后肌腱止点重建跟骨内移截骨术治疗与副舟骨相关的平足症13例(16足),男4例,女9例;年龄18～64 岁,平均41.3岁。单足10例,双足3例;均有明显的跟骨外翻。术后以美国足踝外科协会(American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS)踝与后足评分评估后足功能,于X线片上测量足弓高度、跟骨倾斜角(CI)、距跟角(TC)、距骨-第一跖骨角(TMT)。结果 13例均获得随访,随访时间12~31个月,平均16.8个月。术后6个月时11例(13足)无任何疼痛,2例(3足)有长距离行走后足部疼痛。术后随访时AOFAS评分从术前(52.4±6.4)分提高至(88.1±2.8)分;负重侧位X线片上足弓高度从(3.8±0.3) mm提高至(12.0±1.1) mm,CI从9.5°±1.1°提高至20.1°±1.5°,TC从47.3°±2.5°改善至32.3°±2.5°,TMT从17.6°±1.6°改善至6.8°±1.0°;负重正位X线片上TC从39.5°±2.3°改善至26.2°±2.0°,TMT从15.2°±1.7°改善至6.3°±1.0°;轴位X线片上跟骨外翻角从11.3°±1.4°改善至4.2°±2.0°。结论 对与副舟骨相关的平足症的治疗,当存在后足外翻畸形时,副舟骨切除胫后肌腱止点重建跟骨内移截骨术可以明显缓解疼痛,有效矫正畸形,近期疗效良好。     

Evaluation of simple excision in the treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular associated with flat feet

The results of 17 patients who had been treated by simple excision, for symptomatic accessory navicular were reviewed 2 to 5 years postoperatively. Although all patients had good or excellent results by subjective criteria, careful examination revealed difficulty in performing the "single-heel rise test" in 8 patients who also had preexisting flat feet. These results suggest the necessity for an objective evaluation system, as well as a different treatment approach, for the association of accessory navicular and flat foot. Received: September 3, 1999 / Accepted: December 7, 1999     

Comparison of outcomes of arthrodesis and reconstruction (advancement), posterior tibial tendon with excision of accessory tarsal navicular bone (Kidner procedure) in type 2 accessory navicula

BackgroundThe therapeutic outcome of the local arthrodesis surgery for type 2 accessory navicula (AN) is rarely reported. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between Kidner and arthrodesis procedures for type 2 AN.MethodsSixteen patients (20 feet) with symptomatic type 2 AN receiving surgical treatment in our hospital between November 2013 and December 2015 were retrospectively included. Ten patients (13 feet) underwent the Kidner surgery (Kidner group) and 6 patients received local arthrodesis procedure (arthrodesis group). Radiographic indices before/after surgery were compared between the two groups. Patient’s satisfaction with surgery outcome was evaluated by patient self-assessment questionnaire.ResultsThe calcaneal pitch angle was significantly increased after surgery in both groups (bothp < 0.01), while the talocalcaneal coverage angle and lateral talo-first metatarsal angle were not significantly changed after surgery. There was no significant difference regarding the postoperative changes in the three radiographic indices between the two groups. In the arthrodesis group, 3 patients (4 feet) had an excellent outcome, 2 patients (2 feet) a good outcome, and 1 patient (1 foot) had a fair outcome. In the Kidner group, 6 patients (8 feet), 2 patients (3 feet), 1 patient (1 foot) and 1 patient (1 foot) had excellent, good, fair, and poor treatment outcomes, respectively. The rate of good-to-excellent outcomes was comparable between the arthrodesis group and Kidner group (83% vs. 80%, p = 0.696).ConclusionOur results suggested that both the Kidner surgery and arthrodesis surgery were an effective treatment for symptomatic type 2 AN.     

Fusion of the primary and accessory navicular bones: a modification of the kidner procedure

Accessory navicular is a congenital anomaly. Present in about 9% of the population, it is symptomatic in only a small percentage. The pertinent anatomy, clinical presentation, classification system, and conservative treatment are discussed. Surgical options are reviewed. The surgical technique for a modified Kidner procedure in which the primary and accessory naviculars are fused is described in detail.