Chronic hepatitis C in Sweden: genotype distribution over time in different epidemiological settings.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) strains are divided into 6 genotypes and several subtypes. Recent studies reported a change in the relative frequency of genotypes within certain regions. We studied the HCV genotype in 312 Swedish patients with chronic hepatitis C, using a core region primer-specific PCR, and grouped the patients according to parenteral risk factors. The date of infection could be estimated in 127 cases. Genotypes 1a (35%) and 3 (31%) were the most common genotypes, followed by genotype 2 (17%), while only 6% had genotype 1b. Genotype 3 was relatively more frequent among subjects infected sexually or by intravenous drug use. The genotype distribution was different from that in studies from other parts of the world, with a lower frequency of genotype 1 (especially 1b) and a higher frequency of genotype 3. The frequency of genotype 1b has decreased and genotype 3 increased over time. The reasons for a different distribution of genotypes in Sweden, compared with other countries, might be a relatively recent introduction of HCV into the population, or a different pattern of transmission.     

Replacement of hepatitis C virus genotype 1b by genotype 2 over a 10-year period in Venezuela

BACKGROUND: Changes in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype distribution with time have been reported in several countries. GOALS: To explore eventual changes in HCV genotype distribution in Venezuela over a 10 years period. STUDY: HCV genotype was determined by direct sequencing of the 5' noncoding region, in 236 isolates circulating in patients treated during years 2005 to 2006. Genotype distribution was compared with the one observed in 43 patients followed during years 1994 to 1996. RESULTS: The prevalence HCV genotype 1 and 2 was 70% and 26%, respectively, in patients followed during years 1994 to 1996. The frequency of genotype 2 was significantly increased to 41% (P=0.04) in patients treated during years 2005 to 2006. A significant reduction in HCV genotype 1b prevalence (48% to 27%, P=0.01) was also observed after this 10 years period, whereas the prevalence of HCV genotype 1a did not change over time (22% vs. 27%, NS). Transfusion was more significantly associated with infection with HCV genotype 1b than with other genotypes (52% vs. 20%, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: HCV subtype 1b seems to have been displaced by HCV genotype 2 in a relatively short period, without increase in the frequency of genotype 3. The low frequency of HCV genotype 3 in Venezuela might be due to the fact that intravenous drug use in Venezuela is less common than in other countries. The implementation of anti-HCV testing in blood banks since 1994 in Venezuela, might have contributed to the reduction in the frequency HCV genotype 1b infection.     

Hepatitis C virus genotypes in north eastern Algeria: A retrospective study

AIM: To determine the frequency of various hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes present in patients from north eastern Algeria. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 435 HCV infected patients from northeast Algeria, detected in the Sadelaoud laboratory and diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2012. The patients were diagnosed with HCV infection in their local hospitals and referred to be assessed for HCV genotype before the antiviral treatment. Demographic information (sex, age and address), genotype, subtype and viral load were retrieved from the patient medical records. The serum samples were tested by the type-specific genotyping assay.RESULTS: The majority of the patients (82.5%) were from the central part of the examined region (P = 0.002). The mean age of the patients studied was 53.6 ± 11.5 years. HCV genotype 1 was the most frequent (88.7%), followed by genotypes 2 (8.5%), 4 (1.1%), 3 (0.9%) and 5 (0.2%). Genotype 6 was not detected in these patients. Mixed infection across the HCV subtypes was detected in twenty patients (4.6%). The genotype distribution was related to age and region. Genotype 1 was significantly less frequent in the ≥ 60 age group than in the younger age group (OR = 0.2; 95%CI: 0.1-0.5, P < 0.001). Furthermore, genotype 1 was more frequent in the central part of the examined region than elsewhere (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The HCV genotype (type 1b was dominant) distribution in Algeria is different from those in other northern countries of Africa.     

Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection in Western Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to determine the recent distribution of various genotypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients with chronic HCV infection in Western Turkey. Additional objectives were to determine whether there are any associations of genotype with gender and age, and to determine the nucleotide similarities and risk factors of non-1 HCV genotypes. METHODS: Serum samples from 345 patients (176 male, 169 female; mean age 53.3+/-12.7 years, range 10-81 years) with chronic HCV infection were analyzed in this study. Viral genotypes were determined by a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-based in-house assay. To confirm genotypes for the samples with band patterns other than genotype 1, the 5' UTR was amplified and sequenced. RESULTS: Genotype 1 was observed in 335 of the 345 patients (97.1%). Of these, 34 patients showed infection with subtype 1a (9.9%) and 301 with subtype 1b (87.2%). Genotypes 2, 3, and 4 were determined in 0.9%, 1.4%, and 0.6% of the patients, respectively. Patients infected with type 1 were significantly older than patients infected with non-1 genotypes; however no significant differences were recorded in gender distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Genotypes other than genotype 1 are quite rare; these are possibly acquired in other countries. Turkish patients with chronic hepatitis C still represent a rather homogenous group with genotypic diversity encountered rarely.     

Genotype distribution amongst hepatitis C patients in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of the genotypes of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) differs according to geographical location. In the United States and in European countries, the majority of patients are infected with genotype 1, 2 or 3. There is a lack of data on the distribution of HCV genotypes in The Netherlands. METHODS: The current survey determined the distribution of HCV genotypes amongst recently genotyped patients seen by physicians treating hepatitis C in The Netherlands. RESULTS: Almost half of the 351 patients (49.3%) were infected with genotype 1. Genotype 3 was the second most dominant genotype with a prevalence of 29.3%. Genotypes 2 and 4 were found in 9.7 and 10.5% of the patients, respectively. For 61.5% of the patients (n=216), the subtype was available. For genotype 1 the prevalence of subtype 1a and 1b was very similar, while for genotype 3 a large majority of patients were infected with subtype 3a. CONCLUSION: This survey gives the first estimation of the distribution of HCV genotypes amongst unselected HCV patients in The Netherlands.     

Geographical distribution of HCV genotypes in Mexico

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is the second cause of endstage liver disease in our country and one of the main indications of liver transplantation. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype is the principal prognostic factor and the determinant of the therapeutic scheme. In our country few data exist regarding the prevalence of HCV infection and genotype distribution in the Mexican Republic has not been determined. The aim of this study was to characterize the prevalence of the different HCV genotypes and to explore their geographical distribution. Methods: Mexican patients with hepatitis C infection, detected throughout the country between 2003 and 2006, were included. All samples were analyzed by a central laboratory and Hepatitis C genotype was identified by Line Immuno Probe Assay in PCR positive samples (Versant® Line Probe Assay Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano CA). Data were analyzed according to the four geographical areas in Mexico. Results: One thousand three hundred and ninety CHC patients were included. The most frequent genotype detected was genotype 1 (69%) followed by genotype 2 (21.4%) and genotype 3 (9.2%). Genotype 4 and 5 were infrequent. There was no subject infected with genotype 6. Genotype 1 and 2 exhibit very similar distribution in all geographical areas. Genotype 3 infected patients were more frequent in the North region (52%) compared with other areas: center-western (30%), center (17%), South-South east (1%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The most prevalent HCV genotype in Mexico is genotype 1. Geographical distribution of HCV genotypes in the four geographical areas in Mexico is not homogenous with a greater frequency of genotype 3 in the north region. This difference could be related to the global changes of risk factors for HCV infection.     

Distribution of HCV genotypes and HCV RNA viral load in different regions of Mexico

Background and aim. To identify the geographic distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and HCV RNA viral load in a large number of HCV-infected carriers in Mexico.Methods. Patients with chronic hepatitis C (n = 8,802) were studied to identify HCV genotype using an immune line probe assay in samples shown previously to be positive for viral RNA by an RT-PCR test. Baseline HCV RNA was also evaluated.Results. Genotype 1 accounted for 70.3%, genotype 2 for 21.8%, genotype 3 for 7.2%, genotype 4 for 0.3%, and genotype 5 for 0.1% of all cases; coinfection was present in 0.3%. Overall, Genotype 1 was the most prevalent Genotype. Regionally, genotype 1 occurred more frequently in the North-East, North, and Center-East regions of Mexico; genotype 2 was more prevalent in the South, East, and Peninsula regions; and genotype 3 was more prevalent in the North and North-West regions. Only 22.4% of patients with genotype 1 were classified in the low HCV RNA viral load category, and the distribution of this genotype did not differ significantly between regions.Conclusion. The prevalence of HCV genotypes and viral load in Mexico was 70.3% for genotype 1, but only 22.4% of these patients had a low HCV viral load. Distribution was not uniform in Mexico, with greater frequency of genotype 2 in South, East and Peninsula Regions and Genotype 3 in North and North-West Regions.     

Distribution of Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes Among Azerbaijani Patients in Capital City of Iran-Tehran

Background

Determination of the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype distributed in a particular area has an important role on public health throughout the world.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of HCV genotypes in Azerbaijani patients.

Patients and Methods

From March 2010 until March 2012, 235 Azerbaijani patients with established chronic hepatitis C, referred to Hospitals related to Iran University of Medical Sciences and Tehran Hepatitis Center, Clinical department of Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroeneterology and Liver Disease, were enrolled in this cross sectional study. About 5 mL of peripheral blood was collected from patients and after separation of plasma, viral RNA extracted. HCV-RNA were amplified by RT-nested PCR using primers from the 5´-UTR and genotyped by RFLP assay, and then HCV genotypes were confirmed using sequencing of cloned PCR products into pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector.

Results

HCV genotyping of positive plasma samples demonstrated that predominant HCV subtype was noted for 1b (71.1%) followed by subtype 3a (17.0%), genotype 2 (6.8%), 1a (1.7%), and mixed infection (3.4%). The mean ± SD age of patients was 37.3 ± 11.8 (range: 2-63) years. Out of 235 patients, 139 (59.1%) were male. The frequency of HCV subtype 3a was higher in patients under 40 years old (3a: 18.1% vs. 15.0%), and subtype 3a was higher in male patients (3a: 18.7% vs. 14.6%).

Conclusions

The current study shows that the predominant HCV genotype among Azerbaijani patients with established chronic hepatitis C is subtype 1b (71.1%) followed by subtype 3a (17.0%).     

慢性丙型肝炎患者病毒基因分型与血清HCV RNA水平的关系探讨

目的研究HCV基因型的分布,以探讨不同基因型感染者血清HCV RNA载量的差异。方法采用PCR法检测218例慢性丙型肝炎患者血清HCV RNA;采用ELISA法检测抗-HCV抗体;使用全自动生化分析仪测定丙氨酸氨基转移酶;采用化学发光免疫分析法测定血清肝纤维化指标;采用基因芯片法进行HCV基因分型。结果在218例HCV RNA阳性血清中共检出9种基因型,分别是lb、2a、3a、3b、6型单基因型共208例和lb+2a、lb+3b、lb+6型、2a+3a共10例四种混合基因型,其中以lb型168例(77.1%)、2a型19例(8.7%)为主;在208例HCV单基因型感染患者中发现不同基因型感染者血清HCV RNA载量无统计学差异(F=0.932,P>0.05);在168例1b基因型和40例非lb基因型感染者,性别差异无统计学意义(x2=0.857,P>0.05),两型感染者之间肝纤维化指标差别比较也无统计学意义。结论我国HCV基因型以lb型为主,基因型与HCV RNA载量及ALT水平之间无相关性。     

Distribution of Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes in Bahrain

Background:

Approximately 170 million people are infected with Hepatitis C virus (HCV) worldwide, making it one of the world’s major infectious diseases. There are no published population based studies about the prevalence of HCV genotypes in Bahrain.

Objectives:

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence and distribution of HCV genotypes and subtypes among a large sample of patients with chronic HCV infection in Bahrain.

Patients and Methods:

Serum samples were collected from 202 HCV positive patients; of them 128 had a viral load (> 500 IU/mL) suitable for the type-specific genotyping assay. Gender-wise and age-wise differences in the distribution of HCV genotypes were determined by Chi Square and Fisher’s Exact tests.

Results:

The predominant genotype among Bahraini patients was type 1 (36.71%), followed by genotypes 3 and 4 (15.6% each) and the lowest frequency was found for genotype 2 (3.9%). Among genotype 1, subtype 1b had the highest frequency (21.09%), followed by subtype 1a (14.06%). Among genotype 3, subtype 3a had the highest frequency (11.72%), while among genotype 4, most of subtypes were undetermined. The frequency of all different HCV genotypes was higher in male patients compared to female patients. Genotype 1 was most common in the age group of 51 - 60 years (38.3%), genotype 2 in 21 - 30 years (60%) and genotype 3 in 51 - 60 years (30%), while genotype 4 was most frequent among the age group > 61 (40%).

Conclusions:

The most common HCV genotype in Bahrain was subtype 1b followed by 1a and 3a. Further studies involving sources of transmission in Bahrain are required to enhance control measures for HCV infection.     

Hepatitis C virus genotypes in France: relationship with epidemiology, pathogenicity and response to interferon therapy. The GEMHEP

The aim of this study was to investigate the following in a large population of French patients with chronic hepatitis C: the geographical distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes; the relationship between HCV genotypes and epidemiological characteristics; severity of the disease; and response to interferon (IFN) therapy. Data from 14 tertiary referral centres, corresponding to 1872 patients with chronic hepatitis C, were prospectively collected from 1989 to 1997. HCV genotyping was performed using the line probe assay (LiPA). HCV genotypes 1b, 3, 1a, 2, 4 and a mixed infection were found in 41%, 22%, 16%, 11%, 4% and 4% of our population, respectively. HCV genotype distribution was homogeneous, except for genotype 2 that was found more frequently in the southwest than in the other regions (21% vs 9.2%) ( P =0.001). HCV distribution was associated with gender, age, and source and duration of infection. In multivariate analysis, these correlations were related to the source of infection, which was the only independent factor significantly associated with genotype ( P =0.001). Genotype 1b was significantly more common in patients with cirrhosis, but in multivariate analysis cirrhosis was independently related to older age at exposure and longer duration of infection ( P =0.001). A sustained response to IFN therapy was observed in 11% of patients infected with genotypes 1a or 1b vs 32% of those infected with genotypes 2 or 3 ( P =0.001). This study shows that HCV genotype is mainly related to the source infection, but not to the intrinsic pathogenicity of HCV, and is a strong predictor of sustained response to therapy.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma in Sweden: its association with viral hepatitis, especially with hepatitis C viral genotypes

Viral markers of chronic hepatitis were tested for in 95 frozen serum samples from 299 patients from Malm?, Sweden, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), diagnosed between 1977 and 1994. Hepatitis B analysis included anti-HBc, HBsAg and, if anti-HBc positive, HBV DNA. Hepatitis C infection analysis included anti-HCV screening, RIBA, HCV RNA and HCV genotyping. HCV genotyping was also carried out in 9 HCV-viraemic HCC-patients from Gothenburg. HCV genotype distribution in HCC cases was compared with Swedish HCV-infected blood donors. Among the 95 patients from Malm?, 28 (29%) had anti-HBc, but only 5 (5%) were chronic HBV carriers, compared with 16 (17%) with chronic hepatitis C (p = 0.021). HCV-related HCC was more common among immigrants (8/16 vs. 8/79; p < 0.001). Genotyping of 25 HCV-infected cases showed genotype 1a in 6 (24%), genotype 1b in 13 (52%), genotype 2b in 4 (16%), and genotype 3a in 2 (8.0%) patients. Genotype 1b was more common among HCC patients than among blood donors (p < 0.001), but 8 of 13 genotype 1b-infected patients were from countries where genotype 1b is predominant. Among native Swedes there was no difference between the HCV genotypes infecting blood donors and those found in HCC patients.     

Hepatitis C virus genotype 3a infection and hepatocellular carcinoma： Pakistan experience

AIM: To assess the association between chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Pakistan, and the genotype distribution among these HCC patients.METHODS: One hundred and sixty-one subjects with HCC were included in this study. Liver biopsy was performed on 145 of the patients; sixteen were excluded because they failed to fulfill the inclusion criteria. Qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for hepatitis B virus and HCV. Samples positive for HCV RNA were genotyped using genotypespecific PCR and confirmed by HCV 5' noncoding region sequencing analysis.RESULTS: Chronic HCV infection was identified a major risk factor (63.44% of tested HCC patients) for the development of HCC. The time from HCV infection to appearance of cancer was 10-50 years. In the HCC patient population, broader distributions of genotypes were present with genotype 3a as the predominant genotype. Using the type-specific genotyping method,we found HCV genotype 3a in 40.96%, 3b in 15.66%, 1a in 9.63%, and 1b in 2.40% of HCC tissue samples. About 28% of cases were found with mixed genotypes. Two cases were unable to be genotyped because of low viral load. Sixty-six percent of treated patients with cirrhosis had an end of treatment response, but unfortunately they relapsed quickly when the treatment was discontinued,and HCC developed during a median 3.8 years.CONCLUSION: There was a strong association between chronic HCV infection and HCC in Pakistan,and between HCV genotype 3a and HCC.     

Hepatitis C virus genotype 3a infection and hepatocellular carcinoma: Pakistan experience

AIM: To assess the association between chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Pakistan, and the genotype distribution among these HCC patients.METHODS: One hundred and sixty-one subjects with HCC were included in this study. Liver biopsy was performed on 145 of the patients; sixteen were excluded because they failed to fulfill the inclusion criteria. Qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for hepatitis B virus and HCV. Samples positive for HCV RNA were genotyped using genotypespecific PCR and confirmed by HCV 5' noncoding region sequencing analysis.RESULTS: Chronic HCV infection was identified a major risk factor (63.44% of tested HCC patients) for the development of HCC. The time from HCV infection to appearance of cancer was 10-50 years. In the HCC patient population, broader distributions of genotypes were present with genotype 3a as the predominant genotype. Using the type-specific genotyping method,we found HCV genotype 3a in 40.96%, 3b in 15.66%, 1a in 9.63%, and 1b in 2.40% of HCC tissue samples. About 28% of cases were found with mixed genotypes. Two cases were unable to be genotyped because of low viral load. Sixty-six percent of treated patients with cirrhosis had an end of treatment response, but unfortunately they relapsed quickly when the treatment was discontinued,and HCC developed during a median 3.8 years.CONCLUSION: There was a strong association between chronic HCV infection and HCC in Pakistan,and between HCV genotype 3a and HCC.     

Epidemiological changes in hepatitis C virus genotypes in France: evidence in intravenous drug users

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes are distributed differently depending on geography and route of infection. We characterized the distribution of genotypes in a large cohort of patients with chronic hepatitis C in the South-east of France and evaluated the relative prevalence according to time of acquisition. One thousand, one hundred-and-eighty-three patients who were anti-HCV-positive were studied. HCV genotype distribution has changed significantly from the 1960s to 2000. The prevalence of genotype 1b decreased from 47% before 1978 to 18.8% in the 1990s while the prevalence of genotype 1a and 3a increased during the same period from 18% and 15.3% to 28.8% and 26.3%, respectively. The logistic regression model showed that genotype 1a was significantly more common in patients infected through intravenous drug injection odds ratio ((OR): 2.08, P  < 0.01) and after 1990 (OR: 1.98, P  < 0.05). Genotype 1b was significantly less frequent in patients infected through intravenous drug injection (OR: 0.17, P  < 0.001) and has decreased since 1978 (OR: 0.27, P  < 0.001). Genotype 3a was independently associated with intravenous drug injection (OR: 6.1, P  < 0.001) and tattooing (OR: 8.01, P  < 0.001) and was more frequent in the 1979–90 period (OR: 2.05 and 1.74, P  < 0.001 and P  < 0.05). Our results show a modification of HCV genotypes distribution over the last four decades due to an increase of intravenous drug use (IVDU) contamination and an evolution of HCV genotypes distribution only in IVDU population characterized by a decrease of genotype 1b, an increase of genotype 3a from 1970 to 1990 and a higher increase of genotype 1a which is currently the predominant genotype in our population.     

贵州地区HCV感染者基因型分布特征

目的 探讨贵州地区丙型肝炎患者HCV基因型分布特征,为HCV感染的防控和个体化治疗提供临床依据。方法 选取2011年9月-2018年10月贵阳市公共卫生救治中心1211例HCV RNA阳性的丙型肝炎患者,采用PCR直接测序法,与GenBank中已知的HCV序列进行对比,获得HCV基因型及亚型,并分析其分布与性别、年龄、民族、地区、感染途径等因素的关系。计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。结果 1211例HCV感染者共检出4种基因型和11种基因亚型,其中以1b型(26.84%)、3b型(27.17%)和6a型(24.28%)为主。不同HCV基因型在男女感染者中分布差异有统计学意义(χ2=15.428,P=0.009),其中男性以3b型为主(29.34%),女性以1b型为主(32.21%)。不同HCV基因型分布在各年龄组中差异有统计学意义(χ2=67.439,P<0.001),≤18岁组与≥60岁组以1b型为主(分别为66.67%、58.93%),而19~39岁组以3b型(28.93%)、6型(29.29%)为主,40~59岁组以1b型(29.54%)、3b型(27.33%)和6型(24.28%)为主。各种感染途径的HCV基因型分布差异有统计学意义(χ2=153.916,P<0.001),感染方式以静脉药瘾为主(57.97%),其次是性接触和有创美容(均为8.42%);经静脉药瘾、有创美容感染HCV者均以3b型为主(分别为31.48%、32.35%),性接触感染者多为HCV 6型(36.27%)。不同民族、贵州地区间HCV基因型分布差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。结论 贵州地区HCV基因型分布呈多样性,3b、1b、6a型为主要流行株,存在HCV 6型中的多种少见基因亚型,且在不同的年龄、性别、感染途径方面HCV基因型分布存在差异。