Role of interventional radiology in the treatment of COVID-19 patients: Early experience from an epicenter

ObjectiveTo highlight the role of interventional radiology (IR) in the treatment of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).MethodsRetrospective review of hospitalized patients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and had one or more IR procedures at a tertiary referral hospital in New York City during a 6-week period in April and May of 2020.ResultsOf the 724 patients admitted with COVID-19, 92 (12.7%) underwent 124 interventional radiology procedures (79.8% in IR suite, 20.2% at bedside). The median age of IR patients was 63 years (range 24–86 years); 39.1% were female; 35.9% in the intensive care unit. The most commonly performed IR procedures were central venous catheter placement (31.5%), inferior vena cava filter placement (9.7%), angiography/embolization (4.8%), gastrostomy tube placement (9.7%), image-guided biopsy (10.5%), abscess drainage (9.7%), and cholecystostomy tube placement (6.5%). Thoracentesis/chest tube placement and nephrostomy tube placement were also performed as well as catheter-directed thrombolysis of massive pulmonary embolism and thrombectomy of deep vein thrombosis. General anesthesia (10.5%), monitored anesthesia care (18.5%), moderate sedation (29.8%), or local anesthetic (41.1%) was utilized. There were 3 (2.4%) minor complications (SIR adverse event class B), 1 (0.8%) major complication (class C), and no procedure-related death. With a median follow-up of 4.3 months, 1.1% of patients remain hospitalized, 16.3% died, and 82.6% were discharged.ConclusionInterventional radiology participated in the care of hospitalized COVID-19 patients by performing a wide variety of necessary procedures.     

Recent trends in central venous catheter placement: a comparison of interventional radiology with other specialties

The authors determined changing trends and growth in tunneled and nontunneled central venous catheter placement procedures. With use of Medicare billing data for tunneled and nontunneled catheter placement, a comparison was made among interventional radiology (IR), surgery, anesthesia, and internal medicine. There has been substantial growth in the placement of central venous catheters. Currently, a minority of these procedures are performed in IR departments. However, there has been significant growth in the radiologic placement of both types of catheters.     

Time-Driven Cost Analysis of Noncuffed Venous Catheter Placement in Infants: Bedside versus IR Suite

PurposeTo compare the direct bundled costs of interventional radiology (IR) suite versus bedside placement of noncuffed central venous catheters in infants.MethodsA single-center retrospective review was performed of all noncuffed upper extremity (peripherally inserted central venous catheter [PICC]) and tunneled femoral (tunneled femoral central venous catheter [TCVC]) catheters placed in infants between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018. Propensity score matching was performed adjusting for age, birth weight, procedure weight, and catheter days. Process maps for each procedure were created based on location and sedation type. Technical success and complications were recorded for each placement. The total direct bundled cost for each catheter placement was calculated by summing the procedure and complication costs.ResultsA total of 142 procedures were performed on 126 matched patients with a technical success of 96% at the bedside and 100% in the IR suite (P = .08). The complication rates did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (P = .51). The total direct bundled costs for catheter placement were $1421.3 ± 2213.2 at the bedside and $2256.8 ± 3264.7 in the IR suite (P = .001).ConclusionsThe bundled cost of bedside femoral catheter placement is significantly less than that of fluoroscopic TCVC and PICC placement performed in the IR suite, mainly related to differences in sedation costs.     

Radiologic placement of central venous catheters: rates of success and immediate complications in 3412 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the success and immediate complication rates associated with 3412 central venous catheter placements performed in an interventional radiology suite. METHODS: Success and immediate complication rates were prospectively recorded for 3412 consecutive patients who had central venous catheters radiologically placed at a tertiary care centre between July 1993 and October 2000. The indication for placement and the insertion site were also recorded. RESULTS: The most common indication for both short- and long-term venous access was hemodialysis, and the right internal jugular vein was the most common site for catheter insertion. Placement was successful for 98.8% of tunnelled lines and 99.3% of temporary catheters. The rate for immediate complications (including pneumothorax, air emboli, bleeding and arterial puncture) for tunnelled catheter placements was 3.8% and for temporary catheter placements was 1.6%; no major complications were documented. CONCLUSION: Our results lend further evidence to the claim that the success and immediate complication rates of radiologically placed central venous catheters compare favourably with blind placement and surgical placement of central venous catheters.     

Central venous catheter placement by an interventional radiology unit: an Australian experience

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the outcomes of central venous catheter (CVC) placement carried out by an interventional radiology unit. A review of our hospital records identified 331 consecutive patients who underwent insertion of a tunnelled or non-tunnelled CVC between January 2000 and December 2004. Key outcome measures included the technical success rate of CVC insertion and the percentage of immediate (<24 h), early (24 h-30 days) and late (>30 days) complications. A total of 462 CVCs were placed under radiological guidance, with an overall success rate of 98.9%. Immediate complications included one pneumothorax, which was diagnosed 7 days after subclavian CVC insertion, and eight episodes of significant haematoma or bleeding within 24 h of CVC insertion. No cases were complicated by arterial puncture or air embolus. Catheter-related sepsis occurred in 2% of non-tunnelled CVC and 8.9% of tunnelled CVC. The overall incidence of catheter-related sepsis was 0.17 per 100 catheter days. As the demand for chemotherapy and haemodialysis grows with our ageing population, interventional radiology suites are well placed to provide a safe and reliable service for the placement of central venous access devices.     

Peripherally inserted central catheter placement in patients with unsuspected central venous obstruction

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical usefulness of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in patients with unsuspected central venous obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 3,272 PICC procedures performed from January 1999 to July 2006, 57 patients had central venous stenosis or obstruction during placement of the PICC. Sixty PICC placements were performed in 57 patients (30 male and 27 female patients; mean age, 59 years). The PICC placements in 57 patients were evaluated with regard to the location and severity of venous disease, underlying causes of venous stenosis or obstruction, catheter placement technique, technical success rate, catheter dwelling time, and complication rate. RESULTS: There were 48 complete obstructions and 12 stenoses. Ipsilateral lesion passage was attempted in 31 patients and was successful in 26 (84%) and unsuccessful in five (16%). Over-the-wire PICC placement was performed in 16 patients, and PICC placement after angioplasty was performed in 10. Contralateral PICC placement without a trial of traversing the lesion was done in 26 patients. The PICC dwell time ranged from 2 to 150 days (median, 25.5 days). Complications occurred in four of the 57 patients (7%) and included tube tip migration (n = 1), catheter occlusion (n = 1), and catheter infection (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: PICCs can be safely placed across central venous lesions in patients with asymptomatic central venous stenosis or obstruction. Contralateral placement is favorable in cases of ipsilateral passage failure.     

US-guided placement of central vein catheters in patients with disorders of hemostasis

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the technical success and immediate complication rates of temporary central catheter placement in a homogenous patient population with disorders of hemostasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty three temporary central vein catheters inserted under ultrasound guidance in 119 patients with bleeding disorders were analyzed over a 4-year period. Patients were males (n=51; 43%) and females (n=68; 57%) with a mean age of 56.6 years (age range 18-95 years). A catheter was inserted in IJV in 129 (97%) procedures, subclavian vein in 2 (1.5%) procedures and femoral vein in 2 (1,5%) procedures. Thirty-three (24.8%) procedures were performed on bedside. Of 119 patients, 106 (89%) had only one catheter placement and the rest had had more than one catheter placement (range 1-3). RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). Average number of puncture was 1.01 (range 1-2). One hundred and nineteen insertions (89.5%) were single-wall punctures, whereas 14 insertions were double-wall punctures. Eight (6%) minor complications occurred including oozing of blood around the catheter in five (3.8%) procedures, small hematoma in two (1.5%) procedure and both in one patient. There was no inadvertent arterial puncture or major complications like hemothorax or pneumothorax in any patients. CONCLUSION: US-guided placement of central vein catheters in patients with disorder of hemostasis is safe with high technical success and low complication rates. US guidance for central venous catheterization should be the preferred method in this group of patients, if available in the hospital setting.     

Factors influencing selection of an interventional radiology training program

PurposeTo understand factors influencing the choice and ranking of Interventional Radiology (IR) training programs among a cohort of medical students and diagnostic radiology residents pursuing careers in IR.Materials and methodsAn IRB approved, 34 question online survey (surveymonkey.com) evaluated the impact of twenty-two different factors and demographics on IR training program selection for medical students and residents. The factors analyzed included programmatic features, location characteristics, academic reputation, program size, benefits/financial incentives, emphasis on clinical care, and future job opportunities. Comparison of Likert scale responses between medical students and residents were performed by using unpaired two-sample t-tests.Results181 (145 male, 35 female) individuals responded to the survey, 74 medical students (40.9%) and 107 residents (59.1%). Medical students and residents both selected variety of IR cases as the most important and highest rated factor when choosing an IR program. Medical students ranked availability of a mentor (p = .03), inpatient consultation service (p = .003), outpatient clinic experience (p = .003), and ICU rotation experience (p < .001) significantly higher. Residents rated job placement/accomplishments of prior fellows (p = .03) and opinion of spouse/significant others (p = .002) significantly higher than medical students.ConclusionsThe top rated factors are similar among medical students and residents however medical students value the clinical aspects of the program (ICU experience, inpatient consultation service, outpatient clinic) more than residents. Residents placed more value on job placement opportunities in selecting an IR program.     

Effect of Health Care Financing Administration regulation on radiology fellowship training

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) regulations on radiology fellowship training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys were sent to 157 fellowship program directors in body imaging and vascular/ interventional radiology. Questions addressed program accreditation status, faculty supervision of fellows, and any change in faculty supervision of fellows in response to HCFA's revised plan for Medicare Part B reimbursement. RESULTS: Eighty of 157 (51%) surveys were returned. Thirty (37%) respondents indicated supervision of fellows had changed after institution of the new HCFA rules in July 1996. Vascular/interventional program directors (n = 25, 49%) were more likely to have changed their practice than body imaging program directors (n = 5, 17%). Nearly all respondents (29 of 30, 97%) indicating a change stated supervision had increased. Twenty-seven (33%) respondents also indicated faculty supervision was beyond that necessary for patient care and house staff education; most of these respondents (21 of 27, 78%) stated the new HCFA regulations were responsible. Many program directors also expressed concern the HCFA regulations might prevent fellows from obtaining sufficient experience to effectively learn independent clinical decision-making. CONCLUSION: HCFA regulations intended to address attending physician billing practices at teaching institutions may have had the unintended effect of substantively altering the training of radiology fellows.     

Radiologic placement of implantable chest ports in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the technical success and complications associated with radiologic placement of implantable chest ports in children for long-term central venous access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 1, 1996 and January 11, 2000, 29 chest ports were placed in 28 children (15 girls, 13 boys; age range, 2-17 years; mean, 11.7 years). The patient's right internal jugular vein was used for access in 93% (27/29) of the procedures, and a collateral neck vein was used as a conduit to recanalize the central veins in two procedures because of bilateral jugular and subclavian vein occlusion. All procedures were performed in interventional radiology suites. Both real-time sonography and fluoroscopy were used to guide venipuncture and port insertion. Follow-up data were obtained through the clinical examination and electronic review of charts. RESULTS: Technical success was 100%. Fourteen percent of the catheters were removed prematurely, including one catheter removed 17 days after placement because the patient's blood cultures were positive for Candida albicans. No patients experienced hematoma, symptomatic air embolism, symptomatic central venous thrombosis, catheter malposition, or pneumothorax. The median number of days for catheter use by patients was 280 days (total, 9043 days; range, 17-869 days). The rate of confirmed catheter-related infection was 14% or 0.04 per 100 venous access days. One catheter occluded after 132 days. CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients, radiologists can insert implantable chest ports using real-time sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance with high rates of technical success and low rates of complication.     

Incidence of Central Vein Stenosis and Occlusion Following Upper Extremity PICC and Port Placement

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) and venous ports. One hundred fifty-four patients who underwent venography of the ipsilateral central veins prior to initial and subsequent venous access device insertion were retrospectively identified. All follow-up venograms were interpreted at the time of catheter placement by one interventional radiologist over a 5-year period and compared to the findings on initial venography. For patients with central vein abnormalities, hospital and home infusion service records and radiology reports were reviewed to determine catheter dwell time and potential alternative etiologies of central vein stenosis or occlusion. The effect of catheter caliber and dwell time on development of central vein abnormalities was evaluated. Venography performed prior to initial catheter placement showed that 150 patients had normal central veins. Three patients had central vein stenosis, and one had central vein occlusion. Subsequent venograms (n = 154) at the time of additional venous access device placement demonstrated 8 patients with occlusions and 10 with stenoses. Three of the 18 patients with abnormal follow-up venograms were found to have potential alternative causes of central vein abnormalities. Excluding these 3 patients and the 4 patients with abnormal initial venograms, a 7% incidence of central vein stenosis or occlusion was found in patients with prior indwelling catheters and normal initial venograms. Catheter caliber showed no effect on the subsequent development of central vein abnormalities. Patients who developed new or worsened central vein stenosis or occlusion had significantly (p = 0.03) longer catheter dwell times than patients without central vein abnormalities. New central vein stenosis or occlusion occurred in 7% of patients following upper arm placement of venous access devices. Patients with longer catheter dwell time were more likely to develop central vein abnormalities. In order to preserve vascular access for dialysis fistulae and grafts and adhere to Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines, alternative venous access sites should be considered for patients with chronic renal insufficiency and end-stage renal disease.     

Radiologic placement of tunneled central catheters: rates of success and of immediate complications in a large series.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine the success and immediate complication rates in a large series of radiologically placed tunneled central venous catheters. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively recorded the success and immediate complication rates in 880 consecutive radiologically placed tunneled central venous catheters. We also recorded the indication for placement, the success of placement, the number of passes required, and whether a double- or single-wall puncture occurred. RESULTS: Hemodialysis was the most common indication for long-term venous access. Venous access was successful in all patients, and catheter placement was successful in 99.4% of patients, with only five failed placements. All patients in whom placement was initially unsuccessful underwent successful placement the same day. All catheters were placed using real-time sonographic guidance. Most were placed in an internal jugular vein, with 87.4% requiring only a single needle pass. The immediate complication rate was only 4.0%, and no major complications occurred. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this series is the largest for which the immediate complication and success rates for radiologically placed central venous catheters have been reported. Our results suggest that radiologic placement of tunneled central venous catheters is a safe and effective alternative to surgery.     

Institution of a Hospital-Based Central Venous Access Policy for Peripheral Vein Preservation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A 12-Year Experience

PurposeTo describe the implementation of nursing-based venous access team (VAT) and standardized interventional radiology (IR) protocols in accordance with Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines to provide central venous access while preserving peripheral veins in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).Materials and MethodsReview of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and small-bore central catheter (SBCC) referral and placement data from VAT and IR databases was conducted over a 12-year period. SBCC referral was automatic for patients with creatinine levels ≥ 3 mg/dL or a renal transplant regardless of creatinine level unless dialysis was not planned. All SBCC insertions, regardless of referral source, were identified and reviewed, and SBCC placements prompted by K/DOQI PICC contraindication were identified. Catheter types, indications, access sites, technical success, and complications were ascertained.ResultsA total of 35,781 requests for PICC placement were made to the VAT; 1,889 (5%) were referred to IR for SBCC placement per institutional policy, and 2,200 SBCCs were attempted or newly placed during this period, 1,879 (85%) based on K/DOQI contraindications. Primary indication for SBCC placement was antibiotic therapy (59%). Access sites included right internal jugular vein (IJV) (70%), left IJV (24%), right external jugular vein (EJV) (3%), left EJV (2%), right common femoral vein (CFV) (0.3%), and left CFV (0.2%). Technical success rate of SBCC insertion was 99%. Six minor (0.3%) and three major (0.1%) complications occurred.ConclusionsAutomatic referral for SBCC placement in patients with CKD via VAT and IR protocols may eliminate PICC placement and thereby protect peripheral veins needed for hemodialysis. SBCC placement has high technical success and low complication rates.     

Principles of non-tunneled central venous access

Non-tunneled central venous access has become an important tool in the management of the sick patient, particularly in the intensive care unit. Image guidance allows more precise placement of lines with overall lower complication rates compared with guidance by physical landmarks. The use of image guidance has brought a procedure traditionally performed by surgeons into the realm of the interventional radiologist. Techniques for placement of non-tunneled central venous catheters, hemodialysis catheters, and peripherally inserted central catheter lines will be discussed.     

The current status of interventional radiology in Canada: results of a survey by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current status of interventional radiology in Canada. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 28 Canadian interventional radiologists (defined as a physician who performs any type of interventional procedure, including biopsies, but excluding interventional neuroradiology) practising in both tertiary and community hospitals in the major centres in all provinces except Prince Edward Island. RESULTS: Twenty-two (79%) of 28 surveys were completed and returned, providing data about 86 interventional radiologists (IRs). IRs were performing almost all of the following procedures at their institutions: inferior vena cava filter placement, venous angioplasty, dialysis fistula angioplasty, diagnostic and therapeutic pulmonary and bronchial artery procedures, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of the lower extremity and renal arteries, percutaneous abscess and biliary drainage procedures, percutaneous nephrostomy, and fibroid embolization. A second group of procedures, performed by both IRs and non-radiologists in most institutions, included: all types of central venous catheter placements, pleural drainage, and gastrostomy tube placement. Procedures not being performed by anyone in a number of institutions included: dialysis graft thrombolysis, varicocele embolization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, palliative stenting of the gastrointestinal tract, fallopian tube recannalization, and liver and prostate tumour treatments. The factors most often limiting the respondents' ability to provide a comprehensive interventional service were the interventional radiology inventory budget and the availability of interventional radiology rooms; 50% of respondents indicated the number of available nurses, technologists and IRs was also an important limiting factor. CONCLUSION: IRs in Canada still play a major role in many of the most commonly performed procedures. However, limited availability of resources and personnel in many institutions may be hampering the ability of IRs to develop new procedures.     

The association of departmental leadership gender with that of faculty and residents in radiology

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Although the number of women graduating from medical school continues to increase, their representation in radiology residency programs has not increased over the past 10 years. We examined whether the gender of radiology faculty and residents differed according to the gender of the departmental leadership. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We issued an anonymous Web-based survey via e-mail to all 188 radiology residency program directors listed in the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA Online). Data regarding the gender of the department chairperson, residency program director, faculty, and residents were collected. The institutional review board granted a waiver for this study, and all subjects provided informed consent. RESULTS: Of the 84 program directors who responded, 9 (10.7%) were chaired by females and 75 (89.3%) by males; residency program director positions were held by 36 (42.9%) females and 48 (57.1%) males. More programs were located in the northeastern United States (n = 31, 36.9%) than in any other region, and more were self-described as academic (n = 36, 42.9%) than any other practice type. Programs that were led by a male chairperson had a similar proportion of female faculty (25.2% versus 27.3%; P = .322) and residents (26.2% versus 27.4%; P = .065) compared with those led by a female. Similarly, radiology departments with a male residency program director had a similar proportion of female residents (24.8% versus 28.7%; P = .055) compared with programs with a female residency program director. CONCLUSION: The gender composition of radiology faculty and residents does not differ significantly according to the gender of the departmental chairperson or residency program director. Nevertheless, there continues to be a disparity in the representation of women among radiology faculty and residents.     

Interventional radiology placement of twin Tesio catheters for dialysis access: review of 75 patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of modern interventional radiology techniques and imaging guidance for placement of jugular vein twin Tesio hemodialysis catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two sets (75 patients) of twin Tesio catheters were percutaneously placed in the right (n = 70) and left (n = 12) internal jugular veins with use of ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopic guidance. Immediate procedural and late complications were recorded. The efficacy of the Tesio system was also evaluated. RESULTS: With US and fluoroscopic guidance, the technical success for access and catheter placement was 100%. Measured dialysis blood flow rate of greater than 375 mL/min was obtained in 95% of the patients and recirculation averaged 4.6% +/- 5%. An inadvertent common carotid artery puncture occurred in one (0.6%) patient and prolonged exit site bleeding occurred in another five patients (3%). Each of these was successfully controlled with compression. More chronically, catheter thrombosis and exit site infection occurred each at the rate of 0.16 episodes per 100 catheter days. All thrombosis and exit site infections responded to local thrombolysis and antibiotic therapy, respectively. Bacteremia occurred in 20 patients and required catheter removal in five patients. There was no clinical evidence of upper extremity or superior central vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Placement of internal jugular, twin Tesio catheters with use of imaging and interventional techniques provides a safe and efficacious means of either short or long-term hemodialysis.     

Direct Translumbar Inferior Vena Cava Ports for Long-Term Central Venous Access in Patients with Cancer

PurposeTo evaluate the indications, complications, and long-term results of translumbar port placements to the inferior vena cava for long-term central venous access in a single tertiary center.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included all patients with cancer who underwent translumbar port placement from January 2000 to July 2012; 31 patients (all women) with an average age of 53.1 years ± 11.1 (range, 30–77 y) were included in the study. Of these patients, 26 (81%) had breast cancer, 3 had lung cancer, 1 had ovarian cancer, and 1 had rectal cancer. Indications included central venous occlusion in 9 patients (29%) and bilateral mastectomy and lymph node dissection in 22 patients (71%).ResultsAll procedures were technically successful. The overall 30-day complication rate was 9.7% (n = 3). Average catheter use was 14.1 months ± 21 (range, 0.75–108 mo). Thirteen (41.9%) ports were removed because they were no longer needed; 4 (12.9%) ports required removal for port malfunction; 12 (38.7%) patients died with their ports still in place; 2 (6.5%) ports remain in use. Three (9.7%) ports required delayed secondary intervention to remain functional. One patient had a systemic infection attributed to the port, resulting in an overall infection rate of 0.08 per 1,000 catheter days.ConclusionsTranslumbar inferior vena cava port placement is a technically feasible and safe alternative method for long-term central venous access.     

Mock radiology oral examination

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To organize and implement a mock oral examination for radiology residents in an attempt to prepare them for the American Board of Radiology Oral Examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mock oral examination was administered to junior and senior radiology residents by radiology faculty. All participants completed postexamination surveys. RESULTS: The mock oral examination process not only provided practice for preboard residents, but also determined areas of deficiency in their fund of knowledge and presenting skills. Additionally, it provided faculty members with areas of curricular weakness. CONCLUSION: Administration of a mock oral examination reaps multiple benefits, which far exceed the task of its implementation.     

Assessing radiology resident reporting skills

PURPOSE: To develop an Objective Structured Clinical Examination for assessing the reporting skills of radiology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The approach used in this study derives from performance-based assessment, that is, tests in which actual performance of a skill is observed and measured. For this task, 29 radiology residents and five faculty members (n = 34) independently dictated reports regarding a set of 20 cases with radiographs in 1 hour. The task was performed in a controlled environment. Data were analyzed by using analysis of variance and tests for linear trends, with the expectation of increasing performance with increasing experience. RESULTS: Significant relationships were observed between subjects' experience and the mean number of cases completed (F = 4.46, P =.006), the mean number of well-specified impressions (F = 5.84, P =.001), and the mean number of urgent or discrepant findings noted (F = 3.67, P =.015). Results also demonstrated a clear linear trend of increasing performance with increasing experience with each variable (P =.002, <.001, and.002, respectively, for t tests with polynomial contrasts). CONCLUSION: The significant linear trends indicate that reporting skills increase with increasing experience in the program. This finding supports the validity of the measurement. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination provides a means of assessing radiology resident reporting skills.