Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis

The economic advantages of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomies versus open tracheostomies in the operating room have been thoroughly evaluated. We are now reporting our comparison of the costs and charges of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomies with those of open bedside tracheostomies at our institution. The current literature comparing the two open techniques and the percutaneous method of placing tracheostomies was reviewed and the charges and costs for these procedures at our institution were compared. Patients were placed into one of three groups for analysis: open tracheostomies in the operating room (Group I), open tracheostomies in the intensive care unit (Group II), and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomies in the intensive care unit (Group III). Based on our own experience and a literature review it is evident that all three approaches to tracheostomies are safe. Economic analysis showed a savings of $180 in cost per procedure and a $658 savings in charges per procedure for the open method at the bedside when compared with the percutaneous method at the bedside. The professional fee for bronchoscopy was not included in this calculation; including this would lead to greater savings with the open method over the percutaneous method. Open tracheostomy in the operating room increased costs over the bedside procedure by $2194 and increased charges by $2871. For the 150 to 180 tracheostomies done each year at our institution utilization of the open technique at the bedside results in a cost savings of approximately $31,500 and a charge savings of $109,000 compared with the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Both the open bedside and percutaneous dilatational methods are reasonable and safe options. However, the open bedside tracheostomy is a better utilization of resources and is more cost effective, and it is the procedure of choice at our institution.     

A new technique for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (G-Trach): preliminary experience in pigs

Tracheostomies are currently used for airway management in patients requiring long‐term respiratory assistance. The dilatational percutaneous technique of forming tracheostomies is a valuable alternative to traditional surgical ‘open’ techniques. In this study, we tested a new dilatational percutaneous tracheostomy device using a balloon dilator with a particular innovative shape (G‐Trach). At the Autonomous University of Barcelona Veterinary Institute, eight pigs (weighing 20–40 kg) were anaesthetised and underwent tracheostomy using the novel G‐Trach technique. The mean (SD) procedure time was 2.63 (0.64) min from tracheal puncture to ventilation through the tracheostomy tube, and the mean (SD) time from positioning the dilator balloon to introducing the cannula was 0.71 (0.38) min. Vital functions and oxygen saturation remained constant throughout the procedures. Postmortem examinations did not reveal any tracheal injury. The G‐Trach seems to be a safe and easy new dilatational percutaneous technique for forming tracheostomies. The minimal subcutaneous tissue dissection could potentially decrease complications when compared with standard dilatational percutaneous tracheostomy methods. To confirm this hypothesis a human trial is ongoing.     

Percutaneous tracheostomy: a clinical comparison of dilatational (Ciaglia) and translaryngeal (Fantoni) techniques.

A number of percutaneous procedures for tracheostomy have been established within the last few years, among them a new technique by Fantoni using a translaryngeal approach for cannula placement. To compare the new translaryngeal tracheostomy (TLT) to the common percutaneous dilatational technique (PDT), we prospectively studied 90 patients who required elective tracheostomy. Tracheostomy was performed according to either the Ciaglia or the Fantoni technique in 45 patients at bedside. The overall complication rate was 11.1% (n = 5) in PDT, including aspiration of blood (n = 4) and severe bleeding requiring surgical intervention (n = 1). During TLT, there were technical difficulties involving guidewire placement in 31.1% (n = 14), and one patient required conversion to PDT. No other complications were noted in TLT. Regardless of the technique used, the postoperative PaO2/FIO2 ratio was slightly lower than preoperatively (P was not significant). When PDT and TLT were compared, the postoperative PaO2/FIO2 ratio was significantly lower in PDT than in TLT (P < 0.05), whereas the preoperative levels did not vary significantly between PDT and TLT. During TLT, the PaCO2 increased significantly, whereas it remained stable throughout PDT. No infection of the tracheostoma was noted in either the PDT or the TLT. We therefore consider both the PDT and the TLT equally safe and attractive techniques for establishing long-term airway access in critically ill patients. IMPLICATIONS: Elective tracheostomy is a widely accepted procedure for gaining long-term airway access. Two techniques for percutaneous tracheostomy-the established Ciaglia method and the new translaryngeal Fantoni technique-were prospectively studied for perioperative complications and practicability in 90 critically ill-patients.     

Percutaneous or surgical trachetomy. Prospective, randomized comparison of the incidence of early and late complications]

BACKGROUND: To compare early and late complications after either conventional surgical or percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: General intensive care unit and neuro-surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: 50 consecutive patients, requiring tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive either surgical (surgical group, n = 25) or percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (percutaneous group, n = 25). Occurrence of perioperative complication were carefully evaluated during ICU stay. Late complications were evaluated with both physical and endoscopic examination at 1, 3 to 6 months after tracheostomy. RESULTS: All surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies were successfully completed and no deaths directly related to the tracheostomy procedures were reported. Completion of the procedure required 41 +/- 14 min in the surgical group and 14 +/- 6 min in the percutaneous one (p < 0.0001). The incidence of early perioperative complications was higher in the surgical group (36%) than in percutaneous one (12%), (p < 0.05). The endoscopic follow-up demonstrated one segmental malacia and one stenosis of the trachea in the percutaneous group only (p = n.s.). Skin repair was better after percutaneous tracheostomy than in the surgical group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is as safe and effective as the conventional surgical tracheostomy. The percutaneous technique is less time-consuming and has a lower rate of early infectious complications with better cosmetic results than the surgical technique.     

Percutaneous (Portex) tracheostomy: an audit of the Newcastle experience

The purpose of this study was to audit the results of percutaneous tracheostomies performed by ENT surgeons in Newcastle. During a 3-year period, 298 tracheostomies: 196 percutaneous and 102 open were studied. A complication rate for percutaneous tracheostomy was found to be 10% compared to 8% for open, this difference was not statistically significant chi 2 = 0.279, P = 0.598 (DF = 1). The indications for percutaneous tracheostomy were mainly limited to respiratory support for intensive care unit patients, whereas the majority of open tracheostomies were performed in the operating theatre. The results of this audit suggest that percutaneous tracheostomy is the method of choice for respiratory support in the intensive care unit and is as safe as the open technique.     

Comparison of open, percutaneous, and translaryngeal tracheostomies.

INTRODUCTION: With 3 tracheostomy techniques currently available, controversy exists regarding which is safest and most economical. Percutaneous (PDT) and the new translaryngeal (TLT) tracheostomies are cited as more cost-effective than the traditional open surgical procedure because they are bedside techniques. Our objective was to compare the perioperative and postoperative complications of the 3 techniques.Study Design: This was a prospective trial involving 100 consecutive patients who underwent tracheostomy between April and December of 1997 at the London Health Sciences Centre and St Joseph's Health Centre in London, Canada. RESULTS: Fifty open tracheostomies were performed. Indications included prolonged ventilation (n = 42), airway protection (n = 5), pulmonary hygiene (n = 2), and sleep apnea (n = 1). A tension pneumothorax was the one significant intraoperative complication. Fifteen postoperative complications occurred, most notable of which was a 2-L hemorrhage at 24 hours. Thirty-seven TLTs were performed, 20 in patients with coagulopathy. Indications were prolonged intubation (n = 27), airway protection (n = 9), and pulmonary hygiene (n = 1). One intraoperative complication of accidental decannulation occurred. One postoperative complication, a pretracheal abscess, occurred in a decannulated transplant patient 2 weeks after the procedure. Thirteen PDTs were performed. Indications were prolonged intubation (n = 6), airway protection (n = 6), and tracheal toilet (n = 1). No significant complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: TLT and PDT have fewer complications than the traditional open technique. TLT appears to have the greatest utility in the coagulopathic patient.     

An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies.

OBJECTIVE: We examined staff utilization and procedure length for percutaneous and open bedside tracheostomies in an intensive care setting. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical outcomes study. METHODS: Intensive care unit (ICU) tracheostomy consults meeting criteria for bedside procedures were randomized to open or percutaneous procedures. The Cook percutaneous kit and a prepackaged tracheostomy tray were used. ICU nursing and respiratory therapy staff was present for all procedures. The total resident time, staff time, and procedure length were recorded. Twelve patients underwent percutaneous tracheostomy, and 12 received an open tracheostomy. RESULTS: An operating room nurse was present for 7 of the open procedures. Ancillary medical staff was present for 3 open tracheostomies: anesthesia for 2 and critical care for 1. Ancillary medical staff was present for 4 percutaneous tracheostomies: anesthesia staff for 1 and critical care for 3. The average resident presence, staff presence, and procedure length for open tracheostomies were 47, 30, and 12 minutes, respectively. For percutaneous tracheostomies, the times were 39, 29, and 12 minutes, respectively. One intraoperative complication occurred during a percutaneous procedure and 2 perioperative complications occurred: 1 in the open group and 1 in the percutaneous group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in procedure length, resident time, or staff time between the 2 procedures. Ancillary staff was occasionally used but was not thought to be necessary for the majority of procedures. Both procedures can be safely and expediently performed in the ICU.     

Die Tracheotomie in der Intensivmedizin

Tracheostomy is one of the oldest surgical procedures and in the past decades has become the method of choice in the management of patients requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. At present, several alternatives exist to conventional surgical tracheostomy, such as the percutaneous dilatational techniques according to Ciaglia (PDT), Griggs (GWDF), and Schachner (Rapitrach). In particular, PDT according to Ciaglia which was introduced in 1985, has been recognized as an equally safe, but less expensive procedure than conventional tracheostomy. Fantoni's translaryngeal percutaneous technique is another new and safe procedure, which was first performed in 1996. Nonetheless, we believe that percutaneous procedures should only be performed by experienced physicians who are well-trained in both endotracheal intubation and mask ventilation. Furthermore, the capacity to perform surgical tracheostomy immediately in case of complications should be given. Only if the contraindications are carefully observed, will these new procedures retain their value and benefit in airway management of long-term ventilated patients.     

Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy

Tracheostomy continues to be a standard procedure for the management of long-term ventilator-dependent patients. Traditionally the procedure has been performed by surgeons in the operating theater using an open technique. This routine practice has recently been challenged by the introduction of bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT), which has been reported to be a cost-effective alternative. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the safety, procedure time, cost, and utilization of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies at a university hospital. A retrospective medical chart review was performed on all ventilator-dependent intensive care unit patients at the University of Virginia Medical Center undergoing tracheostomy during a 23-month period beginning December 26, 1996. Of the 213 patients identified for review, 74 and 139 patients received percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies, respectively. Of 74 percutaneous tracheostomies, 73 reviewed were performed by general surgeons, pulmonary physicians, or anesthesiologists in the intensive care unit; all open tracheostomies were performed by surgeons in the operating room, and one percutaneous procedure was performed in the operating room. Perioperative complications occurred in five of 74 patients (6.76%) during PDT; of these, three patients (4.1%) experienced major complications requiring emergent operative exploration of the neck. Three patients (2.2%) experienced perioperative complications during surgical tracheostomy. The mean procedure time was significantly shorter for the percutaneous procedure. Average charges per patient in an uncomplicated case including professional fees, inventory, bronchoscopy (if performed), and operating room charges were $1753.01 and $2604.00 for percutaneous and standard tracheostomies, respectively. These charges do not include the charges associated with surgical intervention after PDT complications. In contrast to previously published reports showing complications clustered during a physician's first 30 percutaneous cases, our study demonstrated no relationship between complication occurrence and physician experience. That is, no learning curve associated with performing PDT was evident. In addition there was no association seen between physician specialty and complication rate. PDT in the intensive care unit costs less than surgical tracheostomy performed in the operating room and can be performed in less time. Several other studies have recommended that bronchoscopy during PDT provides additional safety; however, in our series all three major complications took place during bronchoscopy-assisted percutaneous procedures. Our series suggests that PDT carries an appreciable risk of major complications. Careful patient selection and additional experience with the procedure may decrease complication rates to an acceptable level.     

PercuTwist: a new alternative to Griggs and Ciaglia's techniques

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Tracheostomy is one of the most common procedures in intensive care units worldwide. In this study we aimed to compare three different tracheostomy techniques with respect to duration of procedure and complications. METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients requiring endotracheal intubation for more than 10 days due to acute respiratory distress syndrome, infections or cerebrovascular events were consecutively selected to undergo the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy technique (PDT n = 44), the guide-wire dilating forceps technique group (GWDF n = 41) or the PercuTwist technique (n = 45). The time taken to perform the procedure (skin incision to successful placement of tracheostomy tube) and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The operating times were found to be 9.9 +/- 1.1, 6.2 +/-1.4 and 5.4 +/- 1.2 min in PDT, GWDF and PercuTwist groups, respectively. The duration of the procedure was significantly shorter in the PercuTwist group as compared to the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (P < 0.01) and guide-wire dilating forceps (P < 0.05) groups. During postoperative bronchoscopy, eight cases of longitudinal tracheal abrasion (four in the PDT group, two in the GWDF group and two in the PercuTwist group), two cases of posterior tracheal wall injury (one in PDT and one in GWDF) and one case of tracheal ring rupture in the PDT group were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tracheostomy techniques have their own advantages and complications. PercuTwist, a new controlled rotating dilatation method, was associated with minimal complications, appears to be easy to perform and a practical alternative to percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and guide-wire dilating forceps techniques.     

Neurophysiological consequences of three tracheostomy techniques: a randomized study in neurosurgical patients

We describe the effects of different tracheostomy techniques on intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and cerebral extraction of oxygen. We attempted to identify the main mechanisms affecting intracranial pressure during tracheostomy. To do so we conducted a prospective, block-randomized, clinical study which took place in a neurosurgical intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. The patients studied consisted of thirty comatose patients admitted to the intensive care unit because of head injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or brain tumor. Ten patients per group were submitted to standard surgical tracheostomy, percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy or translaryngeal tracheostomy. In every technique a significant increase of ICP (P < .05) was observed at the time of cannula placement. Intracranial hypertension (ICP > 20 mm Hg) was more frequent in the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy group (P < .05). Cerebral perfusion pressure dropped below 60 mm Hg in eleven cases, more frequently during surgical tracheostomy. Arterial tension of CO2 significantly increased in all three groups during cannula placement. No other major complications were recorded during the procedures. At follow-up no severe anatomic or functional damage was detected. We conclude that the three tracheostomy techniques, performed in selected patients where the risk of intracranial hypertension was reduced to the minimum, were reasonably tolerated but caused an intracranial pressure rise and cerebral perfusion pressure reduction in some cases.     

Percutaneous tracheostomy

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the different techniques of percutaneous tracheostomies, their advantages, drawbacks, complications and to compare them to standard surgical tracheostomies. This study will consider only elective (non emergency) bedside procedures in intensive care units. DATA SOURCES: Extraction from Medline database of english and french articles on percutaneous tracheostomies and searching along with major review articles. STUDY SELECTION: The collected articles were selected according to their qualities regarding to their evidence level. In addition to several important or historic references, the literature of the five past years was studied. DATA EXTRACTION: The articles were reviewed according to their contribution for techniques, perioperative and postoperative complications, recent advances, advantages and drawbacks of all procedures. Publications addressing recent comparisons between surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies were specially studied. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four techniques of bedside percutaneous tracheostomies are available and marketed, in France: Ciaglia's dilation technique (with multiple or unique dilator), Griggs's technique (using a special designed forceps), and Fantoni's technique (Trans Laryngeal Tracheostomy). The most spred but also first described technique is the Ciaglia's (1985). The most recent articles comparing surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies techniques are not able to demonstrate a superiority of one of them in terms of feasibility or safety. In other words, there should be a slight advantage for the percutaneous tracheostomy regarding to the late post-operative complications, as there should be a slight advantage for the surgical techniques regarding to the perioperative complications. The literature analysis point out firstly the learning curve for percutaneous dilational tracheostomy, with a significant decrease of complication incidence with the operator's experience and secondly the continuous endoscopic guidance seems to increase the safety of the percutaneous procedure. CONCLUSION: Since there has been a great deal of percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care units, the incidence of tracheostomy have increased in those services. There is a trend to replace the surgical procedure by the percutaneous one. However, according to the potentially jeopardizing complications, percutaneous tracheostomy should be done by an experienced operator with the help of a continuous endoscopic guidance.     

First line application of a modified dilatational tracheostomy in the intensive care

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing clinical use of the percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy data concerning their first line application are still lacking. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the intra- and postinterventional morbidity of a modified dilatational tracheostomy in a surgical intensive care unit of a German university hospital over a 2-year period. RESULTS: A total of 107 elective dilatational tracheostomies were performed in 105 patients. There were no intraoperative complications. 2 accidental decannulations occurred in the postoperative period. One conventional tracheostomy had to be performed secondary. Stoma side bleeding or clinical relevant infection had not been observed. After definite decannulation wound closure was spontaneous in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The first line application of the dilatational tracheostomy has a low morbidity.     

Weaning from ventilator after cardiac operation using the Ciaglia percutaneous tracheostomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictors of weaning from mechanical ventilation after cardiac operation with the Ciaglia percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in our preliminary experience in the use of this technique. METHODS: We prospectively analysed 33 consecutive patients (mean age 70.9+/-12.7 years) who underwent PDT in our intensive care unit after cardiac operation. The investigation involved preoperative and postoperative clinical status, operative procedure, indication and timing for PDT. RESULTS: PDT was performed after a mean time of 7.7+/-5.0 consecutive days of translaryngeal intubation. Twenty-four (73%) patients were weaned from ventilator after a mean time of mechanical ventilation of 15.8+/-9.1 days. Time point of PDT was the only predictor of ventilator weaning (P=0.0029): there was significant association between PDT performed before the seventh consecutive day of translaryngeal intubation (early PDT) and successful weaning from ventilator (P=0.01; odds ratio=11.2, 95% confidence interval=1.2-104.3). Among the patients weaned from ventilator, those who underwent early PDT had significantly shorter times of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit and hospital stays than patients with later PDT (P=0.035, 0.011 and 0.0073, respectively). Nine (27%) patients died of their underlying disease while still being mechanically ventilated; another six (18%) spontaneously breathing but still incannulated patients died afterward. No major PDT-related complications were observed. Two minor peristomal bleedings and one self-resolving subcutaneous emphysema were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Early PDT was a safe and effective method to wean from mechanical ventilation the cardiosurgical patients of this series.     

Elective bedside surgery in critically injured patients is safe and cost-effective.

OBJECTIVE: The success of elective minimally invasive surgery suggested that this concept could be adapted to the intensive care unit. We hypothesized that minimally invasive surgery could be done safely and cost-effectively at the bedside in critically injured patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: This case series, conducted between October 1991 and June 1997 at a Level I trauma center, examined bedside dilatational tracheostomy (BDT), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement. All procedures had been performed in the operating room (OR) before initiation of this study. METHODS: All BDTs and PEGs were performed with intravenous general anesthesia (fentanyl, diazepam, and pancuronium) administered by the surgical team. IVC filters were placed using local anesthesia and conscious sedation. BDTs were done using a Ciaglia set, PEGs were done using a 20 Fr Flexiflow Inverta-PEG kit, and IVC filters were placed percutaneously under ultrasound guidance. Cost difference (delta cost) was defined as the difference in hospital cost and physician charges incurred in the OR as compared to the bedside. RESULTS: Of 16,417 trauma admissions, 379 patients (2%) underwent 472 minimally invasive procedures (272 BDTs, 129 PEGs, 71 IVC filters). There were four major complications (0.8%). Two patients had loss of airway requiring reintubation. Two patients had an intraperitoneal leak from the gastrostomy requiring operative repair. No patient had a major complication after IVC filter placement. Total delta cost was $611,994. When examined independently, the cost was $324,224 for BDT, $164,088 for PEG, and $123,682 for IVC filter. OR use was reduced by 506 hours. CONCLUSIONS: These bedside procedures have minimal complications, eliminate the risk associated with patient transport, reduce cost, improve OR utilization, and should be considered for routine use in the general surgery population.     

Tracheostomie versus perkutane Dilatationstracheotomie

There are currently many indications and established surgical techniques for tracheotomy with a variety of approaches. The interdisciplinary diagnostic evaluation, selection of the procedure, care of tracheotomized patients and in particular the treatment of typical problems and complications should be under the control of an ear nose and throat specialist. In emergency management a wide range of non-surgical procedures, such as bag-valve mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation and extraglottic airway devices (e.g. laryngeal mask) are initially available. If these are unsuccessful, translaryngeal transtracheal airway management is the last resort. In this case various techniques, such as coniotomy, translaryngeal transtracheal oxygenation and ventilation, as well as occasionally surgical tracheotomy can be applied. Taking the contraindications of percutaneous dilatation tracheotomy into consideration this method is a viable alternative to surgical tracheotomy. Due to various contraindications, such as the need for a permanent tracheostomy, anatomical difficulties and the impossibility of intubation or tracheobronchoscopy, surgical tracheotomy remains of fundamental importance in the surgical repertoire.     

Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy: Clinical Comparison of Griggs and Fantoni Techniques

Elective tracheostomy is widely considered the preferred airway management of patients on long-term ventilation. In addition to open tracheostomy, a number of percutaneous procedures have been introduced during the last two decades, among them techniques according to Griggs (guidewire dilating forceps, or GWDF) and to Fantoni (translaryngeal tracheostomy, or TLT). The aim of the study was to evaluate these two techniques in terms of perioperative complications, risks, and benefits in critically ill patients. A series of 100 critically ill adult patients on long-term ventilation underwent elective percutaneous tracheostomy, either according to the Griggs (n= 50) or Fantoni (n= 50) technique. Tracheostomy was performed under general anesthesia at the patient's bedside. The mean (±SD) operating times were short, 9.2 ± 3.9 minutes (TLT) and 4.8 ± 3.7 minutes (GWDF) on average. Perioperative complications were noted in 4% of patients during either TLT or GWDF and included massive bleeding, mediastinal emphysema, posterior tracheal wall injury, and pretracheal placement of the tracheostomy tube. With regard to oxygenation, pre- and postoperative arterial oxygen tension divided by the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) ratios did not vary significantly, and no perioperative hypoxia was noted regardless of the technique used. We conclude that both TLT and GWDF represent attractive, safe alternatives to conventional tracheostomy or other percutaneous procedures if carefully performed by experienced physicians and under bronchoscopic control.     

Translaryngeal tracheostomy in highly unstable patients

Percutaneous tracheostomy is a widely accepted and commonly performed technique for attaining long-term airway access in critically ill patients. However, severe respiratory failure and coagulopathy are relative contraindications for these procedures. We describe two patients with severe respiratory failure and inhibitor-complicated haemophilia A who underwent elective percutaneous tracheostomy performed translaryngeally, using the new Fantoni technique. Apart from two minor bleeding episodes in the haemophilic patient which were controlled promptly, no other complications occurred. If certain precautions are observed carefully, we believe that translaryngeal tracheostomy is a procedure which is superior to other percutaneous techniques and safe even in patients with severe respiratory failure and coagulopathy.     

Peri-operative complications during percutaneous tracheostomy in obese patients

The safety of percutaneous tracheostomy in 73 obese patients (body mass index > or = 27.5 kg.m(-2)) in a cohort of 474 adults was studied. Four percutaneous techniques were employed (percutaneous dilational tracheostomy, n = 48; Ciaglia Blue Rhino, n = 157; guide wire dilating forceps, n = 62, translaryngeal tracheostomy, n = 207). The overall complication rate was 43.8% (n = 32) in the obese group compared to 18.2% (n = 73) in the control group (p < 0.001). Seven (9.6%) obese patients suffered life-threatening complications compared to three non-obese patients (0.7%, p < 0.001). Obese patients had a 2.7-fold increased risk for peri-operative complications, and a 4.9-fold increased risk for serious complications. The data suggest that percutaneous tracheostomy in obese patients is associated with a considerably increased risk for peri-operative complications, especially for serious adverse events.