Lower esophageal sphincter pressure in Chagas' disease

It is known that lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in patients with idiopathic achalasia is higher than in normal subjects, but in patients with Chagas' disease, who have esophageal disease with similar clinical, manometric, and radiologic results, studies of LES pressure show contradictory findings. We measured the LES pressure in 118 patients with chronic Chagas' disease, 14 patients with idiopathic achalasia, and 50 control subjects using a perfused catheter and the stationary pull-through (SPT) technique. The patients with Chagas' disease had normal esophageal radiologic examination (group A, N=50), delay in esophageal clearance without dilatation (group B, N=41), or delay in esophageal clearance with dilatation (group C, N=27). The LES pressure of Chagas' disease patients of group A (18.6 ±9.1 mm Hg, mean ±SD), group B (17.8 ±9.7mm Hg), and group C (21.6 ±10.1 mm Hg) was lower (P<0.001) than the LES pressure of the controls (24.9 ±10.2 mm Hg). In patients with idiopathic achalasia, the LES pressure (40.7 ±17.8 mm Hg) was higher than in control subjects (P<0.01) and Chagas' disease patients (P<0.001). We conclude that the LES pressure of patients with Chagas' disease tended to be lower than that of control subjects and achalasia patients.Presented in part at the 8th World Congress of Gastroenterology, September 1986, São Paulo, Brazil, and published in abstract form inDig Dis Sci 31:273, 1986.     

Characterization of Esophageal Striated Muscle in Patients with Achalasia

Many studies have been conducted analyzing the manometric properties of patients with achalasia, but the striated portion of the esophagus has never been analyzed and is often overlooked. We retrospectively reviewed 120 manometric tracings (20 achalasia, 100 controls) performed between 1994 and 1997 and excluded tracings from patients with chronic cough and nutcracker esophagus. The data were assessed for age, sex, symptoms, duration of symptoms, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, gastroesophageal gradient, upper esophageal sphincter pressure, smooth muscle contraction amplitude and duration, striated muscle contraction amplitude and duration, length from upper esophageal sphincter to maximal striated muscle contraction, and esophageal length. The maximum striated muscle contraction amplitude was significantly decreased in achalasia patients with a median amplitude of 45 mm Hg (range 12–95) vs 76 mm Hg (range 30–210) in the control group (P = 0.002). Although the wave forms were similar, the maximum striated muscle contraction duration and the distance from the upper esophageal sphincter in achalasia patients was not significantly different from controls. The length of the esophagus was significantly longer in achalasia patients with a median value of 25 cm (range 21–30) vs 21 cm (range 17–26) in the control group (P < 0.001). Patients with achalasia have significantly lower maximum striated muscle contraction amplitudes and longer esophagi, but the duration of the contractions and the configuration of the wave forms are not different.     

Lower esophageal sphincter pressure as an index of gastroesophageal acid reflux

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and the volume of acid placed into the stomach required to induce gastroesophageal reflux in man. LES pressure was recorded continuously and by station pull-through by three radially oriented catheters in both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects during the graded infusions of 0.1 N HCl acid into the stomach. Sumptomatic subjects had a mean LES pressure of 7.5±0.7 mm Hg and refluxed at a volume of 140.0±21.0 ml. Fifty-five percent of asymptomatic subjects refluxed at a mean volume of 380.0±24.7 ml, and had a mean LES pressure of 13.8±0.4 mm Hg. Asymptomatic nonrefluxers at a volume of 500 ml of 0.1 HCL acid had a mean LES pressure of 18.9±1.1 mm Hg. The mean LES pressure and acid volumes showed statistical significance between the three groups (P<0.01). There was an excellent overall correlation between LES pressure and acid volume required to produce reflux in all subjects (r=0.91,P<0.001). Following reflux, asymptomatic but not symptomatic subjects showed a significant increase in LES pressure. These studies suggest that: (1) LES pressure does provide an accurate index of the gastroesophageal antireflux mechanism, provided that acid volume is considered; and (2) asymptomatic subjects showing acid reflux have higher LES pressures, reflux at higher volumes, and develop an LES contractile response after the reflux episode.This work was supported by a grant from the Smith Kline & French Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.     

The effect of intravenous diazepam on esophageal motility in normal subjects

Controversy exists over whether diazepam can be used for sedation during esophageal manometry studies without affecting the results. To evaluate the effect of diazepam, 20 healthy asymptomatic volunteers were studied using a standard manometry protocol employing an Arndorfer capillary infusion system. Following a baseline manometry, each subject received 0.1 mg/kg diazepam intravenously over 1 min and underwent repeat manometry 5 min after completion of the injection. All manometry recordings were coded and read blindly. The amplitude of the lower esophageal sphincter was significantly reduced by diazepam from 26.2±10.9 and 30.0±10.9 mm Hg to 18.8±7.6 and 24.5±9.7 mm Hg by rapid and station pull-through methods, respectively (P<0.01 all both methods). Esophageal contraction wave duration was significantly increased following diazepam at 3, 8, and 13 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (P<0.01 all levels). There was a trend toward increased contraction wave amplitude following diazepam administration in the lower three fourths of the esophagus. On the basis of these results, we conclude that diazepam sedation may produce misleading results when used during esophageal manometric testing. It is recommended that diazepam not be used in manometric studies of normal subjects or patients with reflux esophagitis and that manometric findings in patients with hypertensive or spastic disorders be interpreted with caution if diazepam is given as a premedication.     

Effect of Pneumatic Dilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux in Achalasia

The aims of this study were to assess the effectof pneumatic dilation on gastroesophageal reflux inachalasia, differentiate esophageal acid due to lactatefrom acid due to gastroesophageal reflux, and determine if chest pain and heartburn arereliable indicators of gastroesophageal reflux. Eightuntreated achalasia patients underwent pre- andpostdilation esophageal fluid/food residue lactate andpH analysis, esophageal manometry, 24-hr pHmonitoring, and symptom assessment. All patients had asuccessful clinical outcome and a decrease in loweresophageal sphincter pressure from 29.1 ± 12.7 to14.7 ± 3.8 mm Hg (mean ± SD; P = 0.04). Abnormalacid exposure was present in two patients before and twopatients after dilation. Postdilation acid exposure wasmild. Lactate was detected before dilation in allpatients. A lactate concentration 2 mmol/liter wasassociated with acidic residue and one abnormal 24-hr pHprofile. There was no correlation between an abnormal24-hr pH test and age, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, or duration of symptoms prior totreatment. Chest pain and heartburn were unrelated todrops in pH. Gastroesophageal reflux is rare inuntreated achalasia and esophageal acidity may resultfrom ingestion of acidic foods or production oflactate. Mild gastroesophageal reflux occurs afterdilation but is of no clinical significance. Chest painand heartburn are not indicators of acid reflux inachalasia.     

Effect of an oral beta2-adrenergic agonist on lower esophageal sphincter pressure in normals and in patients with achalasia

The effect of the beta₂-adrenergic agonist, carbuterol, was studied on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in normals and in patients with achalasia. In normals, the mean LES pressure decreased from 23.1±6.2 mm Hg (mean±sem) to 16.0±5.0 mm Hg at a 4.0-mg dose of carbuterol (P<0.05). In patients with achalasia, the mean LES pressure decreased from 50.1±5.1 mm Hg to 22.7±2.4 mm Hg after a 4.0-mg dose of carbuterol (P<0.01). The duration of action following oral administration exceeded 90 min. These studies indicate that the LES in man has beta₂-adrenergic receptors that mediate a reduction in pressure. The magnitude of LES pressure reduction in patients with achalasia suggests that this drug may be of therapeutic benefit.     

Achalasia in the elderly

Clinical and manometric data from 13 elderly subjects with idiopathic achalasia (mean age 79±2 years) were compared with findings from younger subjects with the same disease (n=79) to see if aging altered the presentation and outcome of this motor disorder. Fewer elderly subjects complained of chest pain (27% vs 53%), and the pain was significantly less severe (P<0.01). Other presenting features (including sex, duration of symptoms, and presence and severity of dysphagia) did not differ between the groups. Across all patients, age weakly and inversely correlated with residual postdeglutitive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (R=–0.34), and residual pressure was significantly lower in the older subjects (8.0±1.3 mm Hg vs 11.9±0.8 mm Hg;P=0.02). No differences in basal LES pressure or esophageal-body contraction amplitudes were present between the groups. Initial success with pneumatic dilation was similar in the two subject groups, but the number of older subjects available for analysis was too small to draw strong conclusions. These results indicate that aging decreases the elevation of LES residual pressure that occurs with achalasia. As elderly achalasia patients also present with less chest pain, the findings may be interrelated.Supported in part by grant AMO7130 from the United States Public Health Service. Dr. Todorczuk is supported by an educational grant from Smith, Kline, and French.     

Response of canine ileocolonic sphincter to intraluminal acetic acid and colonic distension

The aim was to determine the effect of intraluminal acetic acid and proximal colonic distension on canine ileocolonic sphincter pressure, ileal motility, and coloileal reflux. In six conscious dogs with an isolated ileocolonic loop, basal pressure of the ileocolonic sphincter was similar during ileal perfusion with 100 mM acetic acid at 1 ml/min (mean±sem=18±0.4 mm Hg) and with saline (18±0.5 mm Hg;P=0.81). Discrete clustered ileal contractions were more frequent with acetic acid, however, and when they propagated across the sphincter, sphincter pressure increased from 18±0.4 mm Hg to 36±1.3 mm Hg (P=0.002). Sphincter pressure was also greater during colonic perfusion with acetic acid (32±0.7 mm Hg) than during ileal perfusion with acetic acid or saline (P<0.017). Moreover, sphincter pressure gradually increased as the colon was distended with saline (slope=0.8 mm Hg/cm H₂O,P<0.017) or acetic acid (slope=0.5 mm Hg/cm H₂O,P<0.017), but the increase did not prevent coloileal reflux. In conclusion, ileal clustered contractions, colonic perfusion of acetic acid, and colonic distension all increased canine ileocolonic sphincter pressure.     

Elevated Intraesophageal Pressure in Patients with Achalasia: A Common and Important Manometric Finding

There is a subgroup of patients with achalasia in which manometry shows elevated intraesophageal pressure, expressed by elevation of esophageal baseline relative to gastric pressure. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of elevated intraesophageal pressure in patients with achalasia and its relationship to clinical, radiographic, endoscopic, and other manometric findings. Manometric studies of 62 patients with achalasia were analyzed and elevated intraesophageal pressure was considered any positive elevation of esophageal baseline relative to gastric pressure. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors associated with elevated intraesophageal pressure. Elevated intraesophageal pressure was found in 32 patients (51.6%). Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was the only independent variable associated with elevated intraesophageal pressure (P = 0.0167). Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly higher in patients with elevated compared to those with normal intraesophageal pressure (34 +/- 1.96 vs 26.5 +/- 1.73 mm Hg; P = 0.006). In addition, lower esophageal sphincter pressure had a positive correlation with intraesophageal pressure (r = 0.49, P < 0.001). Conversely, no correlation was found between elevated intraesophageal pressure and various symptoms, disease duration, radiologic dilation, a finding of retained fluid during endoscopy, and esophageal length. We conclude that elevated intraesophageal pressure is a common manometric finding in patients with achalasia, with a prevalence of 51.6%, and is associated with significantly higher lower esophageal sphincter pressure.     

End expiration is more accurate than mid respiration in measuring lower esophageal sphincter pressure

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Two ways popularly used to measure lower esophageal sphincter pressure are the mid-respiratory and end-expiratory methods. The aim of this study was to compare the suitability of these methods in the manometric assessment of patients with endoscopically documented esophagitis. METHODS: Manometry was performed on 22 consecutive patients to determine whether medical therapy or surgery was the more appropriate treatment strategy. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was measured during a slow station pull-through. End-expiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure was assessed by measuring the highest trough which coincided with end expiration. Mid-respiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure was assessed by bracketing the highest pressure over >/=3 respiratory cycles and measuring the mid point. RESULTS: Mid-respiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure (25.6 mm Hg) was higher (p < 0.0001) than end-expiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure (15.7 mm Hg). Nine (41%) end-expiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressures were abnormally low (i.e., <10 mm Hg), whereas three (14%) mid-respiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressures were abnormally low (i.e., <14 mm Hg; p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS Mid-respiratory lower esophageal sphincter pressure measurement includes respiratory artifact and does not accurately measure lower esophageal sphincter pressure. End-expiratory sphincter pressure better identifies potential surgical candidates.     

Evaluation of esophageal motility in laryngectomized patients

Laryngectomy for treatment of laryngeal-pharyngeal carcinomas may impair the sensation in the larynx and epiglottis, with consequent impairment of esophageal motility. Our aim in the present study was to investigate the esophageal motility of laryngectomized patients. Esophageal manometry was performed on 17 patients submitted to laryngectomy 2 to 71 months (median 29 months) before the examination. Eleven were rehabilitated with esophageal voice and six could not speak. Ten swallows of a 5 ml bolus of water were recorded at the lower esophageal sphincter and at 5, 10 and 15 cm above it. The lower esophageal sphincter pressure was measured by the rapid pull-through method and the upper esophageal sphincter pressure by the station pull-through method. The results were compared with those obtained for a control group of 40 healthy volunteers. The amplitude of contractions was lower and the number of nonperistaltic contractions was higher in laryngectomized patients than in volunteers (P < 0.05). The duration of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (7.4 +/- 1.5 s) was shorter in laryngectomized patients than in volunteers (8.8 +/- 1.6 s, P < 0.05). The upper esophageal sphincter pressure was lower (34.9 +/- 29.1 mm Hg) in laryngectomized patients than in volunteers (61.2 +/- 20.8 mm Hg, P < 0.05). There was no difference between groups in contraction duration or velocity, in the numbers of multipeaked or failed contractions, lower esophageal sphincter pressure or in the number of swallows followed by complete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. In conclusion, laryngectomy causes esophageal motility impairment characterized by low contraction amplitude, nonperistaltic contraction and shorter lower esophageal sphincter relaxation duration.     

Reproducibility of the Rapid Pull-Through Technique for Categorizing Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure

Duplicate measurements of basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure using a triple-lumen catheter and the rapid pull-through technique (RPT) were performed in 250 consecutive patients to determine their reproducibility for categorizing LES pressures as normal, hypertensive, or hypotensive. For all subjects, mean LES pressure did not differ for the two measurements (25.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 26.2 +/- 1.0 mm Hg, p greater than 0.5), but the correlation coefficient was only modest (r = 0.73). Reproducibility of categorization was 92% (230 of 250 subjects), and was best for subjects with normal (170/179, 95%) or hypotensive (24/26, 92%) values (for hypertensives: 36/45, 80%). Interstudy variability was least for the hypotensive group (1.8 +/- 0.2 mm Hg) and greatest for the hypertensive group (16.4 +/- 1.9 mm Hg). Likewise, the range of individual values from the triple-lumen catheter was least for the hypotensive subjects (4.7 +/- 0.7 mm Hg) and greatest for those with hypertensive LES pressure (32.5 +/- 2.6 mm Hg). These data show that, despite its interstudy variability, the RPT reproducibly categorizes basal LES pressure in greater than 90% of cases. The technique appears least reliable in determining hypertensive LES pressure, where diaphragmatic contraction may most significantly contribute to measurement variability.     

Esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter function in healthy premature infants

Gastroesophageal reflux is a common problem in premature infants. The aim of this study was to use a novel manometric technique to measure esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter pressures in premature infants. Micromanometric feeding assemblies (OD, ≤2 mm) incorporating 4–9 manometric channels were used in 49 studies of 27 premature neonates. Esophageal body motility was recorded at three sites for 20 minutes after feeding. Twenty attempts (one per minute) were made to stimulate swallowing via facial stimulation (Santmyer reflex). In 32 studies, lower esophageal sphincter pressures were recorded (sleeve) for 15 minutes before and after feeding. Peristaltic motor patterns were less common than nonperistaltic motor patterns (26.6% vs. 73.4%; P < 0.0001) that comprised 31.1% synchronous, 34.6% incomplete, and 6.3% retrograde pressure waves. Reflex swallowing was elicited more frequently in neonates older than 34 weeks postconceptional age than in younger infants (33.4% vs. 20.4%; P < 0.05). Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 20.5 ± 1.7 mm Hg before and 13.7 ± 1.3 mm Hg after feeding (P < 0.0005). Premature infants show nonperistaltic esophageal motility that may contribute to poor clearance of refluxed material. In contrast, the lower esophageal sphincter mechanisms seem well developed.     

Augmentation of lower esophageal sphincter pressure and gastric yield pressure after radiofrequency energy delivery to the gastroesophageal junction: a porcine model

BACKGROUND: An endoscopic technique that eliminates gastroesophageal reflux disease would be of benefit to patients. The endoscopic delivery of radiofrequency energy to the porcine gastroesophageal junction was investigated and its effect on lower esophageal sphincter pressure, gastric yield pressure, and histology was assessed. METHODS: Twenty pigs underwent esophageal manometry and endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (100 units) into the lower esophageal sphincter. After 1 week, animals were randomized to radiofrequency energy treatment of the gastroesophageal junction with a 4- needle catheter and thermocouple-controlled generator (n = 13) or no further intervention (control, n = 7). At 9 weeks, animals underwent esophagoscopy, manometry, gastric yield pressure determination, and sacrifice for histopathologic evaluation. RESULTS: Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure declined by 3.7 +/- 2.6 mm Hg (control, p = 0.03) vs. 0.97 +/- 5.8 mm Hg (radiofrequency, p = 0.29) after 9 weeks. Mean gastric yield pressure was 24.9 +/- 8.2 mm Hg (control), compared with 43.4 +/- 10. 7 mm Hg (radiofrequency) (p = 0.0007). Histopathologic assessment demonstrated normal mucosa, mild fibrosis, and no inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency energy delivery reversed much of the lower esophageal sphincter pressure reduction achieved with botulinum toxin injection and augmented gastric yield pressure by 75% compared with controls. Given the safety of radiofrequency energy delivery in this study and in other areas of medicine, human studies to assess the effect of radiofrequency energy on gastroesophageal reflux disease are warranted.     

Esophageal manometry: a comparison of findings in younger and older patients

Objective: We sought to determine the utility of esophageal manometry in an older patient population.
Methods: Consecutively performed manometry studies (470) were reviewed and two groups were chosen for the study, those ≥ 75 yr of age (66 patients) and those ≤ 50 years (122 patients). Symptoms, manometric findings (lower esophageal sphincter [LES], esophageal body, upper esophageal sphincter [UES]) and diagnoses were compared between the groups.
Results: Dysphagia was more common (60.6% vs 25.4%), and chest pain was less common (17.9 vs 26.2%) in older patients. In the entire group, there were no differences in LES parameters. Older patients with achalasia had lower LES residual pressures after deglutition (2.7 vs 12.0 mm Hg), but had similar resting pressures (31.4 vs 35.2 mm Hg) compared with younger achalasia patients. Duration and amplitude of peristalsis were similar in both groups, whereas peristaltic sequences were more likely to be simultaneous in the older group (15% vs 4%). The UES had a lower resting pressure in the older patients (49.6 vs 77.6 mm Hg) and a higher residual pressure (2.0 vs −2.7 mm Hg). The older patients were less likely to have normal motility (30.3% vs 44.3%) and were more likely to have achalasia (15.2% vs 4.1%) or diffuse esophageal spasm (16.6% vs 5.0%). When only patients with dysphagia were analyzed, achalasia was still more likely in the older group (20.0% vs 12.9%).
Conclusions: When older patients present with dysphagia, esophageal manometry frequently yields a diagnosis to help explain their symptoms.     

A test of gastroesophageal sphincter competence

Gastroesophageal manometrics, using continuously perfused polyvinyl tubes, and acid reflux (pH test) were studied prospectively in 13 patients with, and 14, without symptoms and/or signs of gastroesophageal reflux. Pressures were recorded simultaneously from stomach, gastroesophageal sphincter and distal esophagus at rest and during gradual abdominal compression to 80 mm Hg. Neither the mean resting pressures nor the mean increase in gastric or sphincter pressures, during abdominal compression, were significantly different (P>0.10). Sphincteric yield pressures did not separate the 2 groups. However, the mean esophageal pressure rise was significantly greater (P<0.001) in the symptomatic patients (34±4.5 vs 9.9±3.2 mm Hg). The mean pressure in the stomach, sphincter and esophagus became almost identical in the symptomatic patients—a common cavity occurred between stomach and esophagus. Two symptomatic patients had negative pH but positive common cavity tests. No asymptomatic patient had evidence of either reflux or a positive common cavity test.Supported by the Denver Veterans Administration Hospital Training Grant in Gastroenterology, TR 110, and by the National Institute of Health Training Grant in Gastroenterology, AM 5122.     

Reevaluation of manometric criteria for vigorous achalasia

Clinical and manometric data from 97 consecutive patients with idiopathic achalasia were analyzed to see if a distinct subset with vigorous achalasia could be identified. Statistical analyses failed to detect a unique group of subjects based on the distribution of contraction wave amplitudes alone. Because of this, patients falling above the 95th percentile (N=4, mean wave amplitude>100 mm Hg for each) were compared with those having mean amplitudes above the conventional threshold for the diagnosis of vigorous achalasia (mean amplitude 60–100 mm Hg,N=4), and with the remainder (N=89, mean amplitude <60 mm Hg). Subjects with mean amplitudes <60 mm Hg and with mean amplitudes 60–100 mm Hg closely resembled each other in all measured clinical features, whereas subjects with mean amplitudes >100 mm Hg were all male, were older (67±4 years vs 47±2 years; P<0.01), and appeared to have somewhat longer duration of symptoms when compared with the remainder (82±41 vs 44±10 months;P=0.4). Chest pain and other esophageal symptoms, basal and residual lower sphincter pressures, and response to first treatment did not differ among the three groups. These data indicate that high-fidelity manometry techniques identify a rare subset of achalasia patients with mean contraction amplitudes exceeding 100 mm Hg that, although older and possibly with greater duration of symptoms, presents similarly to others with idiopathic achalasia. Outcome from conventional treatment is also similar for the vigorous and nonvigorous patients, making the distinction of questionable value.Supported in part by a grant (AM07130) from the United States Public Health Service. Dr. Todorczuk is supported by a grant from Smith Kline and French.     

Clinical and manometric findings in benign peptic strictures of the esophagus

To determine the possible factors that may contribute to the development of peptic stricture of the esophagus, clinical and manometric features were compared in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux and those with peptic strictures of the esophagus. Patients with stricture were older and had a longer duration of heartburn than patients without a stricture. Most importantly, patients with stricture had a more marked decrease in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, 4.9±0.5 mm Hg, than patients without a stricture, 7.5±0.6 mm Hg, P<0.01. The LES pressure in all patients with stricture was below 8 mm Hg, and did not overlap with normal values. Patients with stricture had either a nonspecific motor abnormality or aperistalsis (64%), compared to patients with symptomatic reflux (32%), P<0.05. Thus, peptic stricture of the esophagus is commonly associated with a long duration of reflux symptoms in patients with a very low LES pressure and esophageal motor disorder.     

Lower esophageal sphincter analysis using computerized manometry in patients with chagasic megaesophagus

Due to the introduction of computer technology into manometry laboratories, three-dimensional manometric images of the lower esophageal sphincter can be constructed based on radially oriented pressures, a method termed 'computerized axial manometry.' Calculation of the sphincter pressure vector volume using this method is superior to standard manometric techniques in assessing lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and idiopathic achalasia. Despite similarities between idiopathic achalasia and chagasic esophagopathy found using clinical, radiological, and manometric studies, controversy around lower esophageal sphincter pressure persists. The goal of this study was to analyze esophageal motor disorders in Chagas' megaesophagus using computerized axial manometry. Twenty patients with chagasic megaesophagus (5 men, 15 women, and average age 50.1 years, range 17-64) were prospectively studied. For three-dimensional imaging construction of the lower esophageal sphincter, a low-complacency perfusion system and an eight-channel manometry probe with four radial channels placed in the same level were used. For probe traction, the continuous pull-through technique was used. Results showed that the lower esophageal sphincter of patients with chagasic megaesophagus have significantly elevated pressure, length, asymmetry, and vector volumes compared to those of normal volunteers (P < 0.05). Aperistalsis of the esophageal body waves was observed in all patients and contraction amplitude was lower than that in normal patients. We conclude that patients with chagasic megaesophagus have hypertonic lower esophageal sphincter and aperistalsis of the esophageal body.     

Abnormal Esophageal Pressures in Reflux Esophagitis: Cause or Effect?

Thirteen patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent esophageal manometric evaluation during acute exacerbations and disease remission to evaluate lower esophageal sphincter and peristaltic pressure in response to treatment. No change was noted in lower esophageal sphincter pressure (15.2 +/- 2.6 mg versus 14.3 +/- 1.8 mm Hg) or peristaltic pressure (64.1 +/- 6.9 versus 62.1 +/- 7/8 mm Hg) with remission while both lower esophageal sphincter pressure and distal amplitude were lower in reflux patients than controls (p less than 0.05). Short-term treatment resulting in endoscopic and symptom improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease does not appear to improve lower esophageal sphincter and peristaltic pressure.