Nicotine withdrawal disrupts new contextual learning

Interactions between nicotine and learning could contribute to nicotine addiction. Although previous research indicates that nicotine withdrawal disrupts contextual learning, the effects of nicotine withdrawal on contextual memories acquired before withdrawal are unknown. The present study investigated whether nicotine withdrawal disrupted recall of prior contextual memories by examining the effects of nicotine withdrawal on recall of nicotine conditioned place preference (CPP) and contextual fear conditioning. C57BL/6J mice trained in CPP exhibited a significant preference for an initially non-preferred chamber that was paired with 0.35 mg/kg nicotine. Following CPP, mice were implanted with mini-osmotic pumps containing 6.3 mg/kg/d nicotine or saline. Pumps were removed twelve days later and nicotine CPP was retested 24 h later. Mice withdrawn from chronic nicotine exhibited CPP, suggesting that older drug-context associations are not disrupted by nicotine withdrawal. One hour later, the same mice were trained in contextual and cued fear conditioning; nicotine withdrawal disrupted contextual but not cued fear conditioning. A subsequent experiment demonstrated that nicotine withdrawal did not disrupt recall of contextual or cued fear conditioning when acquisition occurred before nicotine withdrawal. These data suggest that nicotine withdrawal disrupts new contextual learning, but does not alter contextual learning that occurred before withdrawal.     

Interactive effects of ethanol and nicotine on learning in C57BL/6J mice depend on both dose and duration of treatment

Objective and rationale Alcohol and nicotine are commonly co-abused; one possible explanation for co-abuse is that each drug ameliorates the aversive effects of the other. Both drugs have dose-dependent effects on learning and memory. Thus, this study examined the interactive effects of acute ethanol and acute, chronic, or withdrawal from chronic nicotine on fear conditioning in C57BL/6J mice. Materials and methods Conditioning consisted of auditory conditioned stimulus-foot-shock unconditioned stimulus pairings. For acute studies, saline or ethanol, then saline or nicotine was administered before training, and saline or nicotine was also administered before testing. For chronic and withdrawal studies, saline or nicotine was administered chronically, and ethanol or saline was administered before training. Results Acute nicotine (0.09 mg/kg) reversed ethanol-induced deficits (1.0 and 1.5 g/kg) in contextual and cued fear conditioning, whereas a low dose of ethanol (0.25 g/kg) reversed nicotine (6.3 mg kg⁻¹ day⁻¹) withdrawal-induced deficits in contextual conditioning. Tolerance developed for the effects of nicotine on ethanol-induced deficits in conditioning and cross-tolerance between chronic nicotine and acute ethanol was seen for the enhancing effects of ethanol on conditioning. Conclusions The complex and sometimes polar actions of ethanol and nicotine on behavior may contribute to co-abuse of these drugs. Specifically, smoking may initially reduce the aversive effects of ethanol, but tolerance develops for this effect. In addition, low doses of alcohol may lessen nicotine withdrawal symptoms.     

The duration of nicotine withdrawal-associated deficits in contextual fear conditioning parallels changes in hippocampal high affinity nicotinic acetylcholine receptor upregulation

A predominant symptom of nicotine withdrawal is cognitive deficits, yet understanding of the neural basis for these deficits is limited. Withdrawal from chronic nicotine disrupts contextual learning in mice and this deficit is mediated by direct effects of nicotine in the hippocampus. Chronic nicotine treatment upregulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR); however, it is unknown whether upregulation is related to the observed withdrawal-induced cognitive deficits. If a relationship between altered learning and nAChR levels exists, changes in nAChR levels after cessation of nicotine treatment should match the duration of learning deficits. To test this hypothesis, mice were chronically administered 6.3mg/kg/day (freebase) nicotine for 12 days and trained in contextual fear conditioning on day 11 or between 1 to 16 days after withdrawal of treatment. Changes in [(125)I]-epibatidine binding at cytisine-sensitive and cytisine-resistant nAChRs and chronic nicotine-related changes in α4, α7, and β2 nAChR subunit mRNA expression were assessed. Chronic nicotine had no behavioral effect but withdrawal produced deficits in contextual fear conditioning that lasted 4 days. Nicotine withdrawal did not disrupt cued fear conditioning. Chronic nicotine upregulated hippocampal cytisine-sensitive nAChR binding; upregulation continued after cessation of nicotine administration and the duration of upregulation during withdrawal paralleled the duration of behavioral changes. Changes in binding in cortex and cerebellum did not match behavioral changes. No changes in α4, α7, and β2 subunit mRNA expression were seen with chronic nicotine. Thus, nicotine withdrawal-related deficits in contextual learning are time-limited changes that are associated with temporal changes in upregulation of high-affinity nAChR binding.     

Bupropion enhances brain reward function and reverses the affective and somatic aspects of nicotine withdrawal in the rat

RATIONALE: Bupropion is an atypical antidepressant and the only non-nicotine-based therapy approved for smoking cessation. Its use has raised much debate as to how a non-nicotine-based agent can aid in smoking cessation. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effects of bupropion on brain reward function under baseline conditions and subsequent to withdrawal from chronic nicotine administration in rats. METHODS: A discrete-trial intracranial self-stimulation paradigm procedure was used that provides one with current intensity thresholds, a measure of reward in rats under baseline conditions and subsequent to withdrawal from chronic nicotine (3.16 mg/kg per day for 7 days via osmotic minipump). Somatic signs were recorded based on a checklist of nicotine abstinence signs in animals withdrawn from nicotine. RESULTS: Bupropion (10-60 mg/kg) dose-dependently lowered reward thresholds in non-withdrawing subjects indicating an increase in reward. Interestingly, a sub-effective dose of bupropion (5 mg/kg) blocked completely the threshold lowering effects of acute nicotine (0.25 mg/kg). Animals withdrawn from chronic nicotine exhibited increases in somatic signs of withdrawal and elevated brain reward thresholds, which is indicative of "diminished interest or pleasure" (i.e. anhedonia) in the rewarding stimuli. Bupropion (10-40 mg/kg) reversed both the reward deficit and the somatic signs, with the highest dose (40 mg/kg) inducing a protracted reversal of the threshold elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion acts on multiple levels to alter brain reward circuits influenced by nicotine, in addition to reducing the expression of somatic signs of withdrawal. First, bupropion, unlike other antidepressants, increases brain reward function under baseline conditions in non-withdrawing subjects. Second, at low doses bupropion blocks the rewarding effects of nicotine. Third, bupropion reverses the negative affective aspects of nicotine withdrawal. Such actions are likely to act in concert to mediate the unique anti-smoking properties of bupropion.     

Genetic background influences the effects of withdrawal from chronic nicotine on learning and high-affinity nicotinic acetylcholine receptor binding in the dorsal and ventral hippocampus

Rationale

The effects of nicotine on cognitive processes may play an important role in nicotine addiction. Nicotine withdrawal impairs hippocampus-dependent learning and genetic factors influence this effect. However, the neural changes that contribute to these impairments are unknown. Chronic nicotine upregulates hippocampal nicotinic acetycholine receptors (nAChRs), which may contribute to cognitive deficits when nicotine administration ceases. If nAChR upregulation underlies withdrawal deficits in learning, then strains of mice exhibiting withdrawal deficits in hippocampus-dependent learning should also show upregulation of hippocampal nAChRs.

Objectives

Here, we examined the effects of nicotine withdrawal on fear conditioning and [³H]epibatidine binding in the dorsal and ventral hippocampus in two inbred mouse strains and their F1 hybrids.

Methods

Male C57BL/6NTac, 129S6/SvEvTac, and B6129SF1/Tac mice were administered chronic nicotine (18 mg/kg/day) for 12 days through osmotic pumps and then were trained and tested in fear conditioning 24 h after cessation of nicotine treatment.

Results

Nicotine withdrawal impaired hippocampus-dependent contextual conditioning in C57BL/6NTac mice but not 129S6/SvEvTac or B6129SF1/Tac mice; no changes were observed in hippocampus-independent cued fear conditioning. Upregulated [³H]epibatidine binding was found in the dorsal, but not ventral, hippocampus of C57BL/6NTac mice and in the ventral hippocampus of B6129SF1/Tac mice after chronic nicotine.

Conclusions

Upregulation of high-affinity binding sites in the dorsal hippocampus of C57BL/6NTac mice, the only strain that exhibited nAChR upregulation in this region and withdrawal deficits in contextual conditioning, suggests that upregulation of high-affinity binding sites in the dorsal hippocampus mediates, in part, nicotine withdrawal deficits in contextual conditioning and genetic background modulates these effects.     

MK-801 disrupts acquisition of contextual fear conditioning but enhances memory consolidation of cued fear conditioning

The effects of pre-training or post-training subcutaneous injections of multiple doses of the non-competitive NMDA-receptor antagonist (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801) on cued and contextual fear conditioning were examined in F344 rats. Pre-training injections of MK-801 (0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg) disrupted contextual fear conditioning but not cued fear conditioning. Post-training injections of MK-801 did not disrupt cued or contextual fear conditioning. In fact, the 0.3 mg/kg dose of MK-801 enhanced cued fear conditioning. Finally, rats were tested for MK-801-induced alterations in sensitivity to pain using the formalin test for nociception. MK-801 did not reduce sensitivity to pain. These results suggest that NMDA receptors are involved in acquisition of contextual fear conditioning but not in memory consolidation of the learned response.     

The effects of DHBE and MLA on nicotine-induced enhancement of contextual fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice

Rationale Previous research indicates that nicotine administration enhances hippocampus-dependent forms of learning, including contextual fear conditioning. This effect is blocked by mecamylamine, a noncompetitive, broad-spectrum nicotinic receptor antagonist. Objectives The present study extends previous research by further characterizing the nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptor (nAChR) subtypes through which nicotine acts to enhance contextual fear conditioning. Methods C57BL/6J mice were trained with two conditioned stimulus (CS; 30 s, 85-dB white noise)–unconditioned stimulus (US; 2 s, 0.57-mA foot shock) pairings and tested 24 h later for contextual and cued fear conditioning. The effects of the α7 nAChR antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA; 1.00, 10.00, and 20.00 mg/kg) and the effects of the α4β2 nAChR antagonist dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHBE; 1.00, 3.00, and 6.00 mg/kg) on cued and contextual fear conditioning and on the enhancement of contextual fear conditioning by nicotine (0.25 mg/kg) were examined. Results We demonstrate that DHBE (all doses) administration attenuates the enhancing effect of nicotine on contextual fear conditioning, and MLA administration has no significant effect on the enhancement of contextual fear conditioning by nicotine. Conclusions The data suggest that non-α7 nAChRs (most likely α4β2 nAChRs) underlie the enhancement of contextual fear conditioning by nicotine.     

Low dose quetiapine reverses deficits in contextual and cued fear conditioning in rats with excitotoxin-induced hippocampal neuropathy

Previous studies have demonstrated that adult rats with excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus display deficits in memory-related behaviors similar to the memory deficits associated with schizophrenia. In this study, we assessed the sub-chronic effects of quetiapine, risperidone and haloperidol on performance deficits after intracerebroventricular administration of the excitotoxin, kainic acid, using paradigms for contextual and cued fear conditioning and spatial reversal learning in rats. The effects of three doses of quetiapine (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg) and single doses of risperidone (0.5 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.15 mg/kg) were compared. Quetiapine administration at the lowest dose (5 mg/kg) reversed deficits in contextual and cued fear conditioning, but not deficits in spatial reversal learning, in kainic acid-treated animals. However, the two higher doses of quetiapine, and the single doses of risperidone and haloperidol, did not reverse any of the kainic acid-induced behavioral deficits. These results may be relevant to the effects of quetiapine and other antipsychotic drugs on memory deficits in patients with schizophrenia.     

The interactive effects of nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptor inhibition on fear conditioning in young and aged C57BL/6 mice

Both normal aging and age-related disease, such as Alzheimer's disease, have diverse effects on forebrain-dependent cognitive tasks as well as the underlying neurobiological substrates. The purpose of the current study was to investigate if age-related alterations in the function of the cholinergic system are associated with memory impairments in auditory-cued and contextual fear conditioning. Young (2-3 months) and aged (19-20 months) C57BL/6 mice were administered scopolamine (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg), a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg), a nicotinic cholinergic receptor antagonist, both scopolamine and mecamylamine (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg, respectively), or saline prior to training. Training consisted of two white-noise CS (85 dB, 30 s)-footshock US (0.57 mA, 2 s) presentations. Testing occurred 48 h post-training. Scopolamine administration impaired contextual and cued fear conditioning in young and aged mice, although the aged mice were less sensitive to disruption by scopolamine. Mecamylamine did not disrupt conditioned fear in the young or aged mice. Scopolamine and mecamylamine co-administration, at doses sub-threshold for disrupting fear conditioning with separate administration, disrupted contextual and auditory-cued fear conditioning in the young mice, indicating that in the young mice the muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic processes interact in the formation and maintenance of long-term memories for conditioned fear. Co-administration of both antagonists did not disrupt fear conditioning in the aged mice, indicating that age-related alterations in the cholinergic receptor subtypes may occur.     

Atomoxetine reverses nicotine withdrawal-associated deficits in contextual fear conditioning.

Recent evidence suggests that the cognitive symptoms of nicotine withdrawal and the cognitive symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may share neural correlates. Thus, therapeutics that ameliorate ADHD symptoms may also ameliorate nicotine-withdrawal symptoms. The present research tested this hypothesis in an animal model of nicotine withdrawal-associated cognitive deficits using atomoxetine, a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that is approved by the FDA to treat the symptoms of ADHD. C57BL/6 mice were prepared with osmotic minipumps that administered 6.3 mg/kg/day of nicotine or saline, and the minipumps were removed after 12 days of continuous treatment. Twenty-four hours later, mice were trained in delay fear conditioning using two paired presentations of an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) with a footshock unconditioned stimulus. Testing for freezing in response to the training context and for freezing in response to the CS occurred the next day. Nicotine-withdrawn mice and their saline-treated counterparts received either saline or atomoxetine before training and the context test. Consistent with previous research, the results indicate that mice withdrawn from chronic nicotine demonstrated lower levels of contextual fear conditioning than mice that were not withdrawn from chronic nicotine. Atomoxetine dose-dependently reversed the deficit, suggesting that nicotine withdrawal may be associated with changes in noradrenergic function, acetylcholinergic function, and/or with changes in cell signaling cascades that are activated by both nicotine and norepinephrine. These data suggest that atomoxetine may be efficacious for treating nicotine withdrawal-associated cognitive deficits that promote relapse in abstinent smokers.     

Effect of bupropion on nicotine self-administration in rats

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of bupropion as a smoking cessation agent are unknown. Bupropion inhibits monoamine uptake as well as neuronal nicotinic receptor (nAChR) function. The present study compared effects of bupropion on nicotine self-administration to those of other stimulant drugs (methamphetamine and apomorphine) that lack nAChR activity in order to determine its mechanism of action. To determine the specificity of bupropion-induced changes in nicotine self-administration, the ability of bupropion to alter sucrose-maintained responding or amphetamine self-administration was determined. METHODS: In nicotine and amphetamine self-administration and sucrose-maintained responding experiments, rats responded for nicotine (0.01 or 0.02 mg/kg per infusion, IV), amphetamine (0.2 mg/kg per infusion, IV) and sucrose pellets (45 mg), respectively, on a fixed ratio 5 schedule. Once responding stabilized, rats were pretreated 15 min before the session with bupropion (1-78 mg/kg) or vehicle. The ability of methamphetamine (0.3-3 mg/kg) or apomorphine (0.01-0.2 mg/kg) to alter responding for nicotine (0.02 mg/kg per infusion, IV) was determined. RESULTS: Bupropion produced a biphasic dose-response pattern at both nicotine infusion doses, increasing infusions at low bupropion doses and decreasing infusions at high bupropion doses. Methamphetamine produced a similar biphasic pattern, whereas apomorphine only decreased nicotine infusions at high doses. Bupropion dose-dependently decreased responding for sucrose and amphetamine. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that high bupropion doses decrease responding nonspecifically; whereas low bupropion doses selectively increase responding for nicotine. The increase in nicotine self-administration is likely due to inhibition of dopamine and norepinephrine transporters, combined with inhibition of nAChRs.     

Hippocampal nAChRs mediate nicotine withdrawal-related learning deficits

Nicotine modulation of learning may contribute to its abuse liability. The role of hippocampal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the effects of acute, chronic and withdrawal from chronic nicotine on learning was assessed via intrahippocampal drug infusion in mice. Acute dorsal hippocampal nicotine infusion enhanced contextual fear conditioning. Conversely, chronic intrahippocampal infusion of a matched dose had no effect, and withdrawal from chronic infusion impaired learning. Thus, hippocampal functional adaptation, evidenced by learning deficits during abstinence, occurs with the transition from acute to chronic nicotine exposure. To investigate which hippocampal nAChRs mediate these adaptations, C57BL/6, β2 nAChR subunit knockout (KO), and wildtype (WT) mice treated chronically with systemic nicotine received intrahippocampal dihydro-β-erythroidine (a high affinity nAChR antagonist). Intrahippocampal dihydro-β-erythroidine precipitated learning deficits in all but the KO mice. Therefore, the action of nicotine at hippocampal β2⁎ nAChRs mediates adaptations in hippocampal function that underlie withdrawal deficits in contextual fear conditioning.     

Cholinergic effects on fear conditioning II: nicotinic and muscarinic modulations of atropine-induced disruption of the degraded contingency effect

Rationale In a companion study (Carnicella et al., 2005), we showed that the muscarinic antagonist atropine, when administered after extensive training during both conditioning and testing, affected neither cued nor contextual fear memories when both of them did not compete for the control of the overt behaviour. In contrast, atropine altered the degraded contingency effect (DCE), that is, the processes by which contextual fear memory competes with the cued one for the control of the conditioned response. Atropine-induced disruption of the DCE was fully reversed by the administration of the anticholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine, which suggests a direct cholinergic implication.Objective The present series of experiments was conducted in order to define more precisely the involvement of the cholinergic system in such an effect.Methods Oxotremorine (0.0, 0.0075, 0.015, or 0.03 mg/kg), pilocarpine (0.0, 0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg), xanomeline (0.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0 or 20.0 mg/kg) and nicotine (0.0, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg/kg) were tested for reversal of the atropine-induced alteration of the DCE.Results Oxotremorine and pilocarpine did not reverse the atropine-induced alteration of the DCE. In contrast, xanomeline and nicotine reversed the effect of atropine on the DCE.Conclusion The present series of experiments reveals complex pharmacological interactions within the cholinergic system when cued and contextual fear memories interact. Results are discussed in this connection and with regard to the relation between the properties of cholinergic agonists and their therapeutic values.     

Cholinesterase inhibitors ameliorate behavioral deficits induced by MK-801 in mice.

Enhancing cholinergic function has been suggested as a possible strategy for ameliorating the cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors in mice treated with the noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, MK-801, which has been suggested as an animal model of the cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. Three separate experiments were conducted to test the effects of physostigmine, donepezil, or galantamine on deficits in learning and memory induced by MK-801. In each experiment, MK-801 (0.05 or 0.10 mg/kg) or saline was administered i.p. 20 min prior to behavioral testing over a total of 12 days. At 30 min prior to administration of MK-801 or saline, one of three doses of the AChE inhibitor (ie physostigmine-0.03, 0.10, or 0.30 mg/kg; donepezil-0.10, 0.30, or 1.00 mg/kg; or galantamine-0.25, 0.50, or 1.00 mg/kg) or saline was administered s.c. Behavioral testing was performed in all experimental animals using the following sequence: (1) spatial reversal learning, (2) locomotion, (3) fear conditioning, and (4) shock sensitivity. Both doses of MK-801 produced impairments in spatial reversal learning and in contextual and cued memory, as well as hyperlocomotion. Physostigmine and donepezil, but not galantamine, ameliorated MK-801-induced deficits in spatial reversal learning and in contextual and cued memory in a dose-dependent manner. Also, physostigmine, but not donepezil or galantamine, reversed MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion. Galantamine, but not physostigmine or donepezil, altered shock sensitivity. These results suggest that AChE inhibitors may differ in their capacity to ameliorate learning and memory deficits produced by MK-801 in mice, which may have relevance for the cognitive effects of cholinomimetic drugs in patients with schizophrenia.     

Examining the clinical efficacy of bupropion and nortriptyline as smoking cessation agents in a rodent model of nicotine withdrawal

Rationale At present, there is a lack of an established animal model to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of smoking cessation agents in the laboratory. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the antidepressants bupropion and nortriptyline, clinically proven smoking cessation aids, within a rodent model of a nicotine withdrawal based on somatic measures. Materials and methods Male hooded Lister rats were chronically exposed to nicotine (3.16 mg kg¹ day¹) for 7 days via SC implanted ALZET osmotic minipumps. Animals were acutely pre-treated with bupropion (10, 30 or 60 mg/kg, IP) or nortriptyline (1.5, 4.7 and 15 mg/kg, IP), and nicotine withdrawal was precipitated by mecamylamine (1 mg/kg). Results Precipitation of nicotine withdrawal led to an increase in somatic signs including body shakes, chews, eye blinks, foot licks, head shakes and ptosis. Bupropion dose-dependently decreased the total abstinence scores and reduced the occurrence of some individual somatic signs. Pre-treatment with 60 mg/kg bupropion did not result in a significant increase in total abstinence scores or individual somatic signs scores after mecamylamine challenge, compared to the mecamylamine control group, suggesting nicotine withdrawal is fully attenuated at this dose. Similarly, the highest dose of nortriptyline reduced total abstinence scores and some individual somatic signs to the level of the mecamylamine control group. However, nortriptyline was only effective at alleviating somatic measures of withdrawal at doses which also suppressed locomotor activity. Conclusion In concurrence with clinical findings proposing alleviation of withdrawal states as a possible mechanism of bupropion and nortriptyline’s smoking cessation action, both drugs were found to ameliorate somatic signs of nicotine withdrawal in rodents.     

Cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking behavior in rats: effect of bupropion, persistence over repeated tests, and its dependence on training dose

Rationale The motivational effects of nicotine-associated cues have been demonstrated in animal studies. However, it is unknown whether the effectiveness of nicotine cues in reinstating nicotine-seeking varies with the extent of prior nicotine self-administration. In addition, the issue of whether bupropion (an FDA-approved smoking cessation medication) interferes with the conditioned incentive of nicotine cues remains to be addressed. Objective This study determined the relationship of cue-reinstated nicotine-seeking and the levels of prior self-administration and examined the effect of bupropion on cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking in comparison with that on self-administration. Materials and methods Male Sprague–Dawley rats were trained in daily 1-h sessions to intravenously self-administer nicotine at different doses (0, 0.015, 0.03, 0.06 mg/kg/infusion) and to associate an auditory/visual cue with each nicotine delivery. After extinction, three reinstatement tests at 15 day intervals were conducted with re-presentation of the cue without nicotine delivery. In separate groups of rats trained with 0.03 mg/kg/infusion nicotine, bupropion (0, 10, 20, 40 mg/kg) was intraperitoneally administered to different groups before the reinstatement and in a within-subject design before the self-administration tests. Results Cue-induced reinstatement of active lever responses was observed at all nicotine doses in the first reinstatement test, but at only the two highest doses during the second and third tests. The magnitude of reinstatement was positively correlated with level of prior responding for nicotine. Bupropion pretreatment decreased nicotine self-administration but enhanced cue-reinstated nicotine-seeking. Conclusions These results demonstrate the positive correlation of cue-reinstated nicotine-seeking with prior responding for nicotine self-administration and the persistence of the cue effect after taking higher doses of nicotine. The results of pharmacological tests suggest that although it is able to help achieve smoking cessation, bupropion may have little clinical benefit for the prevention of relapse associated with exposure to environmental smoking cues.     

Scopolamine and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats: dose-effect analysis.

Muscarinic-cholinergic antagonism produces learning and memory deficits in a wide variety of hippocampal-dependent tasks. Hippocampal lesions produce both acquisition deficits and retrograde amnesia of contextual fear (fear of the place of conditioning), but do not impact fear conditioning to discrete cues (such as a tone). In order to examine the effects of muscarinic antagonism in this paradigm, rats were given 0.01 to 100 mg/kg of scopolamine (or methylscopolamine) either before or after a fear conditioning session in which tones were paired with aversive footshocks. Fear to the context and the tone were assessed by measuring freezing in separate tests. It was found that pretraining, but not post-training, scopolamine severely impaired fear conditioning; methylscopolamine was ineffective in disrupting conditioning. Although contextual fear conditioning was more sensitive to cholinergic disruption, high doses of scopolamine also disrupted tone conditioning. Scopolamine did not affect footshock reactivity, but did produce high levels of activity. However, hyperactivity was not directly responsible for deficits in conditioning. It was concluded that scopolamine disrupts CS-US association formation or CS processing, perhaps through an attenuation of hippocampal theta rhythm.     

Effects of the beta-blocker propranolol on cued and contextual fear conditioning in humans

Rationale Beta-adrenergic receptors are involved in the consolidation of emotional memories. Yet, a number of studies using Pavlovian cued fear conditioning have been unable to demonstrate an effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on acquisition or retention of fear conditioning. Evidence for the involvement of beta-adrenergic receptors in emotional memories comes mostly from studies using fear inhibitory avoidance in rodents. It is possible that fear inhibitory avoidance is more akin to contextual conditioning than to cued fear conditioning, suggesting that context conditioning may be disrupted by beta-adrenergic blockade.Objective This study investigated the effects of the beta-adrenergic blocker propranolol on cued and contextual fear conditioning in humans.Methods Subjects were given either placebo (n=15) or 40 mg propranolol (n=15) prior to differential cued conditioning. A week later, they were tested for retention of context and cued fear conditioning using physiological (startle reflex and electrodermal activity) and subjective measures of emotional arousal.Results The results were consistent with the hypothesis. The skin conductance level (SCL) and the subjective measure of arousal suggested reduced emotional arousal upon returning to the conditioning context in the propranolol group, compared to the placebo group. The acquisition and retention of cued fear conditioning were not affected by propranolol.Conclusions These results suggest that beta-adrenergic receptors are involved in contextual fear conditioning.     

Nicotine and bupropion share a similar discriminative stimulus effect

Bupropion is a weakly potent central nervous system (CNS) stimulant that is marketed both as an antidepressant and as an anti-smoking aid. The mechanism(s) by which it produces its effects is not well understood. In the present study, the effect of bupropion was examined in rats trained to discriminate the stimulus effect of 0.60 mg/kg of (-)-nicotine from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination task. In tests of stimulus generalization (substitution), the nicotine (ED(50)=0.17 mg/kg) stimulus completely generalized to bupropion (ED(50)=5.50 mg/kg). In addition, interaction studies were conducted that evaluated the effect of 3.0 mg/kg of bupropion, a dose that when given alone produced saline-appropriate responding, in combination with various doses of nicotine. This application resulted in an enhancement of the potency of nicotine (ED(50)=0.05 mg/kg), as indicated by a leftward shift of the nicotine dose-effect function. In tests of stimulus antagonism, various doses of bupropion were administered prior to the training dose of nicotine and were found to be ineffective as antagonists of the nicotine stimulus. In contrast, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nicotine receptor) antagonist mecamylamine (AD(50)=0.40 mg/kg) completely blocked the stimulus effect of nicotine. Mecamylamine did not attenuate the stimulus generalization of bupropion. The results demonstrated that bupropion can produce a nicotine-like response in nicotine-trained animals, but it does so via a mechanism of action that is unlike that of nicotine. It is speculated that bupropion may be somewhat effective as an anti-smoking treatment in people who are motivated to quit smoking because low doses of bupropion produce a nicotine-like effect(s) that serve as a suitable substitute for nicotine.     

β2 subunit-containing nicotinic receptors mediate the enhancing effect of nicotine on trace cued fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice

Rationale Previous research indicates that acute nicotine administration enhances the acquisition of contextual fear conditioning and trace cued fear conditioning. Pharmacological inhibition of α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), but not α7 nAChRs, blocked the enhancing effect of nicotine on contextual fear conditioning. Similarly, genetic deletion of the β2 nAChR subunit but not the α7 nAChR subunit blocked the enhancing effect of nicotine on contextual fear conditioning. Objectives In the present study, nAChR subunit knockout mice were used to compare the involvement of β2 subunit-containing nAChRs and α7 subunit-containing nAChRs in the effects of nicotine on hippocampus-dependent trace cued fear conditioning and contextual fear conditioning. Methods β2 nAChR subunit knockout mice, α7 nAChR subunit knockout mice, and their wild-type littermates received either nicotine or saline 5 minutes before training and testing. Mice were trained using five conditioned stimulus (CS; 30 s, 85 dB white noise)—trace (30 s)—unconditioned stimulus (US; 2 s footshock) pairings. Freezing to the context and freezing to the CS were assessed 24 h later. Results Both contextual and trace cued fear conditioning were enhanced by nicotine administration in wild-type littermates and in α7 nAChR subunit knockout mice. In contrast, neither contextual fear conditioning nor trace cued fear conditioning was enhanced by nicotine administration in β2 nAChR subunit knockout mice. Conclusions These results suggest that β2 subunit-containing nAChRs but not α7 nAChR subunit-containing nAChRs are critically involved in the enhancing effect of nicotine on contextual and trace cued fear conditioning.