Staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty using rough and smooth surface femoral stems with similar design: 10-year survivorship of 48 cases

Background?Various studies have reported good long-term results using femoral stems with either smooth or rough surfaces. In this retrospective cross-sectional survivorship study, we reviewed the 10-year results of 51 bilateral staged cemented total hip arthroplasties using the Harvard or the Charnley femoral stems—which have almost similar geometry but a different surface finish.

Methods?51 patients were reviewed at median interval of 10 (Harvard group) and 11 years (Charnley group) after the primary operation. We evaluated cement mantle thickness, alignment of the components, presence of radiolucent lines, and aseptic loosening. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to calculate the survival rate using various endpoints.

Results?8 hips in the Harvard group were revised for aseptic loosening of thefemoral component at a median interval of 6.3 years after the primary procedure. 3 hips in the Charnley group were revised for aseptic loosening of the femoral and acetabular components between 10 and 11 years after the primary procedure. The 10-year survival rate for the femoral component using revision surgery for aseptic loosening as an endpoint was 80% (95% CI: 31–42) and 95% (95% CI: 44–47) in the Harvard and the Charnley group, respectively. Cox regression analysis did not reveal any statistically significant effect of various radiographical parameters on the survival rate (p < 0.05).

Interpretation?Our results demonstrate that in the group of patients studied, the femoral stem component with the matt surface finish had less satisfactory 10-year survival than the femoral stem of similar design which had a smooth surface finish.

?     

Ten-year survivorship of rough-surfaced femoral stem with geometry similar to Charnley femoral stem

The aim of this study is to review the 10-year results of 269 cemented total hip arthroplasties performed using the Harvard femoral stem with matte surface finish and Charnley stem-like geometry. This is a retrospective cross-sectional survivorship study. We retrospectively reviewed the results of 269 cemented total hip arthroplasties performed using the Harvard femoral stem in 257 patients (men/women 93:164, mean age 71.2 years) between 1990 and 1994. The median duration of follow-up for the surviving implants was 118 (range 60-129) months. Radiographs were reviewed to evaluate the type of osteoarthritis, cement mantle thickness, alignment of the components, presence of aseptic loosening, and radiolucent lines. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed to evaluate 10-year survival and the impact of various radiological parameters on the prosthesis survival respectively. Of the 248 eligible patients (260 hips), 6 patients (7 hips) were lost to follow-up, and 67 patients had died at the time of the study; 36 hips (35 patients) underwent revision surgery for aseptic failure (median duration 60 months, range 12-125 months), and 11 hips were revised for septic failure (median duration 24 months, range 10-53 months from the index procedure). The femoral component was revised in all patients, whereas the acetabular component was revised in 27 patients. Ten-year survival for the femoral and acetabular components using aseptic loosening (with and without revision surgery) as an end point was 77.5% (71.5%-83.5%) and 91.1% (87.2%-95%), respectively. Cox regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant (P > 0.05) effect of various radiological parameters on survival rate. Our results demonstrate that the matte surface finish femoral component (with geometry similar to Charnley femoral component) has less satisfactory long-term survival rate.     

Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that cemented femoral components with a polished surface may provide superior long-term fixation when compared with femoral components with a roughened surface. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component with a polished surface finish and compare them with the results of total hip arthroplasty performed with a similar design of cemented femoral component with a rougher surface finish. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive group of 132 patients (149 hips) in whom primary total hip arthroplasty had been performed by one surgeon using a cemented collared femoral component with a polished (0.1-microm Ra) surface finish and a cementless acetabular component. Ninety-eight patients (115 hips) were followed for a minimum of ten years. We compared the survivorship of this prosthesis with that of a femoral component of similar design but with rougher surfaces (matte or grit-blasted). RESULTS: No polished stems were revised because of aseptic loosening or demonstrated radiographic evidence of loosening; however, eight hips (5.4%) with a polished stem demonstrated osteolysis distal to the greater or lesser tro-chanter. In contrast, six stems (2.0%) with a matte surface finish of 0.8-microm Ra were revised because of aseptic loosening, and an additional five stems were seen to be loose radiographically. Eleven stems (9.2%) with a grit-blasted surface finish of 2.1-microm Ra were revised because of aseptic loosening, and an additional four stems were seen to be loose radiographically. The difference in the prevalence of revision due to aseptic loosening between the group with the 0.1-microm Ra surface and the group with the 2.1-microm Ra surface was significant (p = 0.001), as was the difference between the prevalence of revision due to aseptic loosening between the group with the 0.8-microm Ra surface and the group with the 2.1-microm Ra surface (p = 0.001). No cups were revised because of aseptic loosening, and one hip had radiographic signs of acetabular loosening. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated excellent durability of a prosthesis consisting of a cemented, collared, polished femoral component and a cementless acetabular component. While no hips were revised because of aseptic loosening, distal femoral osteolysis was observed in eight hips (5.4%), a higher prevalence than has been reported by others after similar durations of follow-up of tapered, collarless, polished femoral components.     

Hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of fifty: A five- to ten-year follow-up

In 37 patients, 45 total hip replacements were performed using contemporary cementing techniques, an uncemented Harris-Galante I acetabular component and a cemented precoated Iowa femoral component in patients under the age of 50 at the time of their surgery; 36 patients with 43 hybrid hips were living, 1 patient with 2 hybrid hips was decreased. No patients were lost to follow-up. At 5- to 10-year follow-up, eight hips were revised for aseptic loosening. No acetabular components, and eight femoral components (18%) were revised for aseptic loosening. When looking at radiographic results, including revision as well as those components that were probably or definitely loose on radiographs, 0 acetabular components and 11 femoral components (24%) were radiographically loose. These results demonstrate the excellent durability of the uncemented Harris-Galante acetabular component in the younger patient. However, the Iowa grit-blasted methyl methacrylate precoated femoral component had a magnitude increase in the prevalence of revision for aseptic femoral loosening when compared to the senior author's long-term Charnley results in this age group. The authors attribute the failure to the rough surface finish applied to the femoral component. However, the polymethyl methacrylate proximal precoating and the femoral component design may also contribute to the femoral failures.     

Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report

The purpose of the current study was to update the results of a prospective, single-surgeon series of primary Charnley total hip arthroplasties performed with cement. This investigation is one of the first studies in which hips treated with total hip arthroplasty with cement were followed for a minimum of thirty years. Twenty-seven patients (thirty-four [10.3%] of the hips in the initial study group) were alive at a minimum of thirty years postoperatively. These patients served as the focus of the present study. Revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component was performed in 7.3% (twenty-three) of the hips from the original study group (excluding those revised because of infection or dislocation) and 26% (eight) of the hips in the living cohort. Revision because of aseptic loosening of the femoral component was performed in 3.2% (ten) of the hips from the original study group (excluding those revised because of infection or dislocation) and 10% (three) of the hips in the living patients. Since the twenty-five-year review, three hips were revised (one because of acetabular loosening, one because of femoral loosening, and one because of instability). This end-result study demonstrated the remarkable durability of cemented Charnley total hip replacements over a span of three decades, with 88% of the original prostheses intact at the time of the final follow-up or at the patient's death.     

Long-term results of use of a collared matte-finished femoral component fixed with second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-median follow-up study

BACKGROUND: So-called second-generation cementing techniques in total hip arthroplasty have been shown to provide better survival of the femoral component than first-generation methods do; however, surface finish and other features of the component design also influence the durability of the reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine the results of primary total hip replacement with use of a collared femoral component with a matte-finished surface fixed with second-generation cementing techniques and followed for ten to twenty years. METHODS: The study group consisted of 256 consecutive hips in 236 patients who had had a primary total hip arthroplasty with fixation of a Harris Design-2 femoral component with second-generation cementing techniques (use of an intramedullary plug and a cement gun). The mean age of the patients at the time of the operation was sixty-six years. One hundred and twelve patients were male, and 124 were female. Seven patients were lost to follow-up less than ten years after the operation. The median duration of follow-up of the living patients who had not had a revision was 15.4 years. RESULTS: At the time of the most recent follow-up, nineteen femoral components (7%) had been revised because of aseptic loosening, five (2%) had been removed because of deep infection, and one (0.4%) had been revised because of recurrent dislocation. The mean Harris hip score for the surviving patients who had not had a revision improved from 51 points preoperatively to 91 points at the most recent evaluation. At fifteen years, the estimated survival rate of the femoral components was 92.2% with revision due to aseptic loosening as the end point and 90.1% with mechanical failure (radiographic loosening or revision due to aseptic loosening) as the end point. Patients who were younger than fifty years old at the time of the operation had a lower fifteen-year rate of survival of the femoral implant, in terms of both revision due to aseptic loosening (72.3% compared with 95.7%, p = 0.0001) and mechanical failure (72.3% compared with 93.1%, p = 0.005), than did patients who were fifty years or older. CONCLUSIONS: Fixation of this collared matte-finished femoral component with use of second-generation cementing techniques for primary total hip replacement provided satisfactory results at ten to twenty years in older patients but less satisfactory results in younger patients.     

20-year experience with cemented primary and conversion total hip arthroplasty using so-called second-generation cementing techniques in patients aged 50 years or younger

We present the 20-year experience of 47 hips in 40 patients aged 50 years or younger with cemented primary total hip arthroplasty using second-generation femoral cementing techniques. Average follow-up duration in the 23 patients living at least 17 years was 18.2 years. Overall, 18 hips (38%) had components revised or removed for any reason, at an average duration of 12.6 years. Every revision or reoperation involved removing the acetabular component. Of these 18 acetabular components, 15 (32%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Eleven additional acetabular components were loose by radiographic criteria at final follow-up, yielding prevalence of aseptic acetabular loosening (55%). Four femoral components (8%) were revised for osteolysis without loosening, and 3 (6%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Femoral osteolysis, with or without component loosening, led to revision in 5 ( 11%) hips compared with 6% for aseptic loosening alone. Osteolysis was the primary problem leading to acetabular and femoral component revision in this series of people < or = 50 years old over the first 20 years after the index operation.     

Weber rotation total hip replacement: a prospective 5- to 20-year followup study

Between 1974 and 1989, 315 primary total hip replacements (274 patients) were done using the cemented Weber Rotation prosthesis and standardized operative technique, which was modified for the stem in 1978. After the first postoperative year, all patients had routine clinical and radiologic examinations at 2-year intervals. Twenty-one patients (22 hips) were lost to followup. At the most recent followup, 30 of 293 hips (253 patients) had been revised: 24 hips for aseptic loosening, five hips for infection, and one hip for a femoral fracture. Survivorship analyses with revision for aseptic loosening as an end point for the 315 hips showed 93% and 78% survival after 10 and 15 years, respectively. Separate survival analyses for the socket showed 99% and 89% survival after 10 and 15 years, respectively. The stem had a survival of 94% and 81%, respectively, during the same time. Survival at 15 years with radiologic evidence of loosening as an end point was 85% for the socket and 72% for the stem. The cementing technique and the design of the acetabular component significantly influenced the rate of loosening. Survivorship analyses with revision for aseptic loosening of the socket, using a modified second generation cementing technique and a hemispheric socket, showed 100% survival after 10 years and 98% after 13 years.     

Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved cementing techniques: a minimum twenty-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: In total hip arthroplasty, techniques for cementing the femoral component have changed over time. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a cementing technique that includes use of a distal cement plug and retrograde filling of the femoral canal affects the fixation of the femoral component at a minimum of twenty years after the operation. METHODS: Between 1976 and 1978, the senior one of us (R.C.J.) performed 357 total hip arthroplasties with use of a Charnley flatback polished femoral stem and a contemporary cementing technique (insertion of a distal cement plug and retrograde filling of the femoral canal with cement) in 320 patients. The results after a minimum follow-up of twenty years were compared with those after 330 total hip arthroplasties performed, between 1970 and 1972, with the same femoral stem by the same surgeon with use of a hand-packing technique of cementing in 262 patients. The clinical and radiographic evaluation as well as the duration of follow-up were identical in the two groups. RESULTS: In the group managed with the contemporary cementing technique, six (1.8%) of the 336 hips that had not been lost to follow-up or revised because of infection or dislocation were revised because of aseptic loosening of the femoral component. Of the ninety-one hips in the eighty-two patients who were alive at a minimum of twenty years, five (5%) had a revision because of aseptic loosening of the femoral component. Only one hip was revised during the fifteen-to-twenty-year follow-up interval. (The revision was performed because of a fracture of the femoral component.) The rate of failure when radiographic signs of loosening were included was 4.8% (sixteen of 336 femoral components that had not been revised because of infection or dislocation) for the group managed with the contemporary cementing technique compared with 6.3% (twenty of 319 hips) in the group managed with the hand-packing technique; the difference was not significant (p = 0.40). Adequate filling of the femoral canal with cement was found to be associated with improved survival of the femoral component (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: While no significant difference between the two cementing techniques could be identified, the ability to deliver adequate cement around the femoral component was more predictable with the contemporary cementing technique. In addition, the prevalence of loosening of the femoral component was low with use of either technique, a tribute to the Charnley flatback polished femoral component design.     

The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the results associated with two different surface finishes (bead-blasted and grit-blasted) for Iowa femoral components used in total hip arthroplasties performed between January 1979 and June 1991 in patients who were less than fifty years old. METHODS: Between January 1979 and December 1985, thirty-six primary total hip replacements were performed in twenty-five patients with insertion of a bead-blasted Iowa femoral component (average surface roughness, 0.8 micrometer) with cement and insertion of a titanium-backed acetabular component (thirty-five hips) or non-metal-backed acetabular component (one hip) with cement. Between January 1986 and June 1991, forty-five primary total hip replacements were performed in thirty-seven patients with use of a precoated grit-blasted Iowa femoral component (average surface roughness, 2.1 micrometers) and a Harris-Galante-I porous ingrowth acetabular component (forty-one hips) or an Osteonics component (four hips). The only change in the design of the femoral component (other than the surface finish) between the two consecutive series was the addition of polymethylmethacrylate precoating to the proximal third of all forty-five grit-blasted stems and modularity of the femoral head of the last eight grit-blasted stems. RESULTS: No hip was lost to follow-up. The duration of radiographic follow-up of the hips treated with the bead-blasted component averaged 11.3 years (range, ten to sixteen years) postoperatively, whereas that of the hips treated with the precoated grit-blasted component averaged 8.2 years (range, five to eleven years). Two (6 percent) of the bead-blasted femoral components were revised because of aseptic loosening compared with eight (18 percent) of the precoated grit-blasted components. Four bead-blasted components (11 percent) were either radiographically loose or were revised because of loosening compared with eleven precoated grit-blasted components (24 percent). Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves evaluated with log-rank analysis revealed that the bead-blasted Iowa femoral components were revised because of aseptic loosening (p = 0.0184) and were radiographically loose (p = 0.0068) less often than the precoated grit-blasted Iowa femoral components. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study have led the senior ones of us to resume using femoral components with a polished surface and fixed with cement.     

High survival rate of hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses: 100 consecutive hips followed for 10 years

We followed 100 consecutive primary total hip replacements with a proximal hydroxyapatite coating for 10 years. No patient was lost to follow-up. 29 patients (32 hips) died before the 10-year follow-up was done; none of their hips had been revised. Thigh pain on activity occurred in 3 hips. We found no radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral components. In course of time the location of dense bone around the femoral stem, which would suggest implant/bone stress transfer, moved distally in 51 of 67 stems after 10 years. No linear or distal osteolysis occurred around the stem. Revision of 1 stem was performed because of thigh pain, but it was found fixed to bone proximally, while 3 cups were revised because of acetabular osteolysis. The 10-year survival of the stem and cup, using revision or pending revision as endpoint, was 100% (95% CI: 99-100) and 97% (95% CI: 94-99), respectively.     

Primary uncemented Harris-Galante acetabular components in patients 50 years old or younger: results at 10 to 12 years

Seventy-three patients (84 hips) 50 years or younger were treated with primary total hip arthroplasty using the Harris-Galante uncemented acetabular component. At a median followup of 10 years, there were seven acetabular metal shell revisions: five for osteolysis and one each for aseptic loosening and dislocation. There were 10 polyethylene exchanges without metal acetabular shell removal. None of the unrevised acetabular components was radiographically loose, but eight had pelvic osteolysis. The rate of 10-year survival without revision of the acetabular metal shell was 87.9% (95% confidence interval, 80.1%-95.7%). The same rate of survival without revision for aseptic acetabular component loosening was 97.3% (95% confidence interval, 92.9%-100%). Revision for aseptic acetabular loosening or polyethylene liner exchange or both was 84.5% (95% confidence interval, 75.8%-93.4%).     

The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: clinical evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants.

Prospective, randomized studies must be performed when new surgical techniques or implants are evaluated. In this study, a new implant system was compared with the Charnley prosthesis, which over the years has been the most used hip implant in Sweden. Between 1985 and 1989, 410 hips were randomized to treatment with a Charnley or a Spectron total hip arthroplasty: 206 Charnley and 204 Spectron prostheses were implanted. The patients were operated on by a standardized procedure using a contemporary cementing technique. The patients were followed prospectively by an independent observer after 1, 3, 5 to 6, and 10 years. Harris Hip Score and patient satisfaction were recorded in the outcome evaluation. A total of 144 patients with 164 hips were deceased, and 15 patients (8 Charnley and 7 Spectron) have required a revision. Nine hips were revised because of aseptic loosening (5 Charnley stems and 4 Spectron metal-backed cups). The Charnley stem as well as the metal-backed Spectron cup had a higher risk for revision because of aseptic loosening. The Charnley ogee cup and the Spectron stem have performed remarkably well with no revision of these components. Seven Charnley prostheses dislocated, but no dislocation was recorded in the Spectron group. Survivorship calculations with a mean follow-up of 10 years revealed an overall 11-year survivorship of 94.5% +/- 3.4% (Charnley, 93.2% +/- 5.8%; Spectron, 95.9% +/- 3.0%). The clinical outcome did not differ between the 2 systems. The overall results in this old population, using a contemporary surgical technique, illustrate that cemented hip arthroplasty is an excellent treatment alternative for elderly patients.     

A second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty mean 9-year results

Two hundred fifty-eight primary total hip arthroplasties in 231 patients were implanted using a circumferentially, proximally porous-coated, collared femoral component and a cementless, hemispherical, porous-coated acetabular component and followed up for a mean of 9 years (5-14 years). Four femoral components were revised (2 stems for infection and 2 stems for aseptic loosening). One additional femoral component was radiographically loose at last follow-up. Nine hips underwent acetabular revision (4 for instability, 2 for infection, 2 for loosening, and 1 for osteolysis). Ten-year survivorship with revision or loosening of any component as the end point was 92%; with femoral component aseptic loosening as end point, survivorship was 98%; with acetabular aseptic loosening as the end point, survivorship was 99%. Osteolysis was identified in 26 hips (13%).     

Cementless CUT femoral neck prosthesis: increased rate of aseptic loosening after 5 years

BACKGROUND: Bone-saving hip arthroplasty techniques, which facilitate revision, are gaining importance as the number of hip replacements in younger patients increases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 123 CUT femoral neck prostheses (ESKA Implants, Lübeck, Germany) were implanted in 113 patients (average age 53 years) between 1999 and 2002. After a mean follow-up of 5 (3-7) years, we determined the state of 120 prostheses; 3 patients could not be located. 97 patients with 107 prostheses, none of which had been revised, were evaluated clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: The median Harris hip score improved from 51 points to 92 points in the unrevised hips. 13 CUT prostheses (11%) had been revised, 7 because of aseptic loosening, 3 because of persisting thigh pain, 1 because of immediate vertical migration, and 2 because of septic loosening. The 5-year survival rate of the CUT prosthesis was 89%. INTERPRETATION: The medium-term survival with this type of femoral component is unsatisfactory, with a high rate of aseptic loosening. The surviving prostheses had a good clinical outcome.     

Long-term outcome of cemented total hip arthroplasty with the Charnley-type femoral stem made of titanium alloy

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty is a successful treatment for hip diseases including osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and rheumatoid arthritis. Various designs of cemented femoral stems made of stainless steel and titanium alloy have been used. Among them, Charnley-type femoral stems made of stainless steel have often been reported to have good long-term outcome. However, the long-term outcome of the Charnley-type femoral stem made of Ti alloy is yet to be reported. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the long-term outcome of cemented primary total hip arthroplasty with the Charnley-type femoral stem made of Ti alloy.MethodsBetween October 1988 and February 1997, 341 cemented primary total hip arthroplasties with the Charnley-type femoral stem made of Ti alloy were consecutively performed in our hospital. Among these, 164 patients (211 hips) who underwent this procedure were followed up for more than 12 years, and the surgical hips were analysed clinically and radiologically. The mean follow-up period was 20.6 years. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed to assess femoral component survival. Factors affecting stem revision for aseptic loosening were also investigated using log-rank tests.ResultsIn the functional assessment, the preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score significantly improved from 47.2 points preoperatively to 79.0 points at the final follow-up. Eventually, 33 femoral stems were revised, of which 12 were revised for aseptic loosening. In the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, the 20-year survival rates with stem revision for aseptic loosening and radiological stem loosening at the end points were 95.9% and 97.1%, respectively. Original diagnosis (non-osteoarthritis) was the only significant factor for aseptic loosening of the femoral stem.ConclusionsCemented primary total hip arthroplasty with the Charnley-type femoral stem made of Ti alloy showed excellent outcomes for more than 20 years.     

Charnley total hip arthroplasty in Chinese patients less than 40 years old

Forty-seven total hip arthroplasties were reviewed in 33 Chinese patients who were <40 years old at the time of operation. The preoperative diagnosis was avascular necrosis in 40% of the hips. A Charnley prosthesis was inserted using early cementing techniques in every hip. The average follow-up was 14.9 years (range, 6.9-21.1 years). The mean preoperative Harris hip score was 43.8 (range, 26-74), and the mean score at latest follow-up was 87.7 (range, 74-99) for the surviving hips. Thirty hips (63%) were revised, and 1 hip was removed because of late deep infection. The main cause of failure was aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. Using revision and radiologic loosening as endpoints, the cumulative survival rate for the acetabular component was 86.3% at 10 years and 27.0% at 15 years. The survival of the femoral components was 81.3% at 15 years. Patients with avascular necrosis had a higher failure rate than patients with other diagnoses (P =.001). An area of cement mantle that was <2 mm thick affected adversely the survival rate of the acetabular components (P =.04).     

Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss

Of 275 femoral revisions done at our institution from 1982 to 1986, we identified 34 patients (35 hips) who represented the senior author's (C.A.E., Sr.) most difficult revision cases as a result of extensive femoral bone loss at least 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. The patients were revised with fully porous-coated femoral components ≥190 mm. We evaluated 25 of the patients (26 hips) who had a minimum 10-year follow-up (mean, 13.3 years). Survivorship was 89% at 10 years with femoral revision as the endpoint (Kaplan-Meier). The femoral aseptic loosening rate was 15% (4 of 26). Three stems were loose but did not warrant reoperation. One stem was revised for aseptic loosening, 1 was revised for septic loosening, and 1 was revised for a fractured femoral component. Bypassing weak or absent femoral bone with an extensively porous-coated stem is an effective reconstructive technique for patients with extensive femoral bone loss.