Knee braces

The preceding discussion has profiled the three different types of knee braces which are available on today's market. It also has attempted to discuss the controversies surrounding these braces and to analyze the scientific data presented to date. Prophylactic braces have been shown to be ineffective in preventing knee injuries in its present day design. Evidence also has shown that their use may even lead to increased knee injuries. Rehabilitative braces, on the other hand, do serve a useful purpose in regard to the operative and non-operative treatment of ligamentous knee injuries. With their ease of application and control of joint motion, they are an important addition to the surgeon's armamentarium. One must keep in mind, however, that these braces provide little static anterior/posterior control and the hinge settings may not actually affect true joint motion. Functional knee braces may play a role in the treatment of patients with pathological laxity due to an injury of the anterior cruciate ligament. Combined with an adequate rehabilitation program and activity modification, these braces do limit excessive anterior tibial translation under low loading conditions. However, under conditions of high loading these braces provide little or no resistance to anterior translation. Therefore, in most sporting activities, their efficacy is questionable. Knee bracing continues to be a complex and controversial topic in the field of orthopedic surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evaluation of the use of braces to prevent injury to the knee in collegiate football players

Data were collected in 1984 from seventy-one schools that were members of Division I of the National College Athletic Association and in 1985 from sixty-one of these schools to assess whether the use of so-called preventive braces for the knee was associated with a decrease in either the severity or the incidence (or both) of injuries to the knee in collegiate football players. Over-all, players who wore braces on the knees had significantly more injuries to the knee than players who did not. The severity of the injuries was no different in the two groups. Based on these findings, we cannot recommend the use of these braces in an attempt to prevent injury to collegiate football players.     

To brace or not to brace? How effective are knee braces in rehabilitation?

Since the clinical benefit of knee braces has yet to be defined, discussion about braces after reconstructive surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament remains controversial. The use of prophylactic braces in sport did not prove to be effective. In ACL insufficient knee joints, the operative treatment is preferred over the use of functional knee braces. Therefore, the postoperative rehabilitation presents the main application of braces. Modern operative techniques with an initial strong fixation of the ACL graft make a functional postoperative treatment without external fixation possible. In the presented meta-analysis of the literature about knee braces, results from clinical and experimental studies are compared. No published clinical data have shown that braces have any effect on postoperative outcome after ACL-reconstruction. Also, no evidence of a significant bracing effect could be demonstrated in the experimental in vivo or in vitro studies, except a limited stabilizing function for lower shear stress below the physiological loads. Consequently, the systematic use of braces in the rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction cannot be recommended.     

Principles of Bracing in the Early Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Bracing is considered a gold standard in treating Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) in infants under 6 months of age with reducible hips. A variety of braces are available that work on similar principles of limiting hip adduction and extension. This paper summarises the current evidence regarding bracing in DDH. Most of the literature pertains to the Pavlik harness (PH) and there are few studies for other brace types. Bracing eliminates dislocating forces from the hamstrings, the block to reduction of the psoas and improves the muscle line of pull to stabilise the hip joint. Recent studies have shown no benefit in bracing for stable dysplasia. The rates of PH treatment failure in Ortolani-positive hips have been reported to be high. Barlow positive hips have lower Graf grades and are more amenable to PH treatment. There is consensus that the earlier the diagnosis of DDH and initiation of PH treatment, the better the outcome. Failure rates due to unsuccessful reduction and AVN are higher with treatment initiated after age 4–6 months. Studies have shown no benefits of staged weaning of braces. While there is no maximum time in brace, current consensus suggests a minimum of 6 weeks. The key to successful bracing lies in education and communication with the family.     

Sinn oder Unsinn der „unloader braces“

Background

Unloader knee braces are a viable and cost-effective alternative in for treatment of medial osteoarthritis of the knee in selected patients. They provide the potential to predict which patients could benefit from a high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and which patients should better be treated which a unicondylar or bicondylar knee replacement.

Discussion

A direct clinical benefit in pain reduction as well as improved knee function has been shown in several clinical studies; however, the underlying mechanism remains uncertain. A potential reduction of the load in the medial compartment of the knee joint by reducing the varus or valgus deformity as well as a reduction of enhanced muscle contraction is discussed.

Conclusion

Despite the promising short-term results, possible long-term benefits of unloader braces are controversial. As possible reasons, natural progression of the underlying osteoarthritis as well as compliance of the patients to wear the braces diminishes significantly with time.     

Sense and nonsense of knee orthosis

The trend for early mobility after surgical treatment of knee joint ligament injuries has led to the production of a large number of different braces in recent years. To allow an approximation of the very complex motion of the human knee, the use of braces with so-called physiological hinges has been recommended in the last few years. The authors report on a group of 50 patients who had sustained injuries to the cruciate ligament and had received IOWA knee braces following surgical treatment, the fit being subsequently checked by X-ray. These checks clearly demonstrated that the hinge of the brace hardly coincides with the knee axes and that there were deviations ranging from 1 to 4 cm. The authors therefore come to the conclusion that brace-fit must be checked by X-ray in all cases and that incorrectly fitted braces should be corrected before use. There is so far no evidence that so-called physiological hinges are really superior to braces with single axes. The current trends and developments cannot really be justified as long as there is no guarantee that the axes of brace and human knee coincide both in motion and during weight-bearing.     

Knee bracing for unicompartmental osteoarthritis

Unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee affects millions of individuals. Most nonsurgical management of this progressive disease is primarily directed at reducing inflammation and pain with medication. Evidence supports the clinical efficacy of bracing for managing osteoarthritis of the knee. In some patients, bracing significantly reduces pain, increases function, and reduces excessive loading to the damaged compartment. A variety of health and functional status instruments, as well as radiologic techniques and biomechanical investigations, has been used to evaluate the unloading capabilities of these braces. Although changes in angulation are relatively minimal, the braces have been shown to load share and thus reduce the stresses in the degenerated medial compartment of the knee.     

Biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint and knee braces

We investigated whether the kinematics of modern knee braces reflect the natural movement of the knee, especially with regard to the roll-glide ratio. Seven commercially available modern knee braces were analyzed in a new measuring unit with a 6-D positional registration system, which had been developed for this study. The results were compared to the theoretically postulated joint movements.All knee braces produced a roll-glide ratio different from the natural movement of the knee. Only the Townsend brace protected the anterior cruciate ligament at the beginning of the movement.Biomechanically, none of the knee braces tested provided efficient protection for the knee movement. We propose a new functional external joint, which allows restoration of the natural roll-glide mechanism of the articulating surfaces.     

Prophylactic knee braces and injury to the lower extremity

Five hundred and eighty high-school football players were studied over a period of two seasons to determine the effect of so-called prophylactic knee braces on the lower extremity. Two hundred and forty-seven athletes who wore single-hinged braces and eighty-three who wore double-hinged braces were paired for the same season of play with 250 athletes who were similar in height, weight, and playing position but who did not wear braces. The fifty-three injuries of the knee that occurred were significantly more frequent (p less than 0.001) in the group that wore single-hinged braces than in the matched, non-braced group. While there were more injuries of the knee in the participants who were double-hinged braces than in the matched controls, who did not wear braces, the increase in the number of injuries was not significant. There was also a dramatic increase (p less than 0.01) in the number of injuries of the ankle and foot in the athletes who wore braces. Our results question the efficacy of the braces that were studied and call attention to the potentially adverse effect of the braces on adjacent joints in the ipsilateral limb.     

Identification of good candidates for valgus bracing as a treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis

Valgus unloader braces are a conservative treatment option for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis that aim to unload the damaged medial compartment through application of an external abduction moment. Patient response to bracing is highly variable, however. While some experience improvements in pain, function, and joint loading, others receive little to no benefit. The objective of this work was to analyze clinical measures and biomechanical characteristics of unbraced walking to identify variables that are associated with the mechanical effectiveness of valgus unloader bracing. Seventeen patients with medial knee osteoarthritis walked overground with and without a valgus unloader brace. A musculoskeletal model was used to estimate the contact forces in the medial compartment of the tibiofemoral joint and brace effectiveness was defined as the decrease in peak medial contact force between unbraced and braced conditions. Stepwise linear regression was used to identify clinical and biomechanical measures that predicted brace effectiveness. The final regression model explained 77% of the variance in brace effectiveness using two variables. Bracing was more effective for those with greater peak external hip adduction moments and for those with higher Kellgren–Lawrence grades, indicating more severe radiographic osteoarthritis. The hip adduction moment was the best predictor of brace effectiveness and was well correlated with several other measures indicating that it may be functioning as a “biomarker” for good bracing candidates. Clinical Significance: The ability to predict good candidates for valgus bracing may improve issues of patient compliance and could enable the ability to train patients to respond better to bracing. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:351–356, 2018.     

Three-month efficacy of three knee braces in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis in a randomized crossover trial

Immediate biomechanical and functional effects of knee braces are often reported, however, the duration and type of knee brace treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remain unclear. The objective was to evaluate usage, comfort, pain, and knee adduction moment (KAM) of three knee braces each worn 3 months by patients. Twenty-four patients with KOA were assigned in a randomized crossover trial a valgus three-point bending system brace (V3P-brace), an unloader brace with valgus and external rotation functions (VER-brace) and a stabilizing brace used after ligament injuries (ACL-brace). Functional questionnaires and gait assessment were carried out before and after each brace wear period of 3 months. A Friedman test was applied between brace wear diary recordings. Repeated measures analyses of variance contrasted the factors brace type (ACL, V3P, and VER), time (pre and post) and wear (without and with) on comfort, pain, function, and KAM. Brace usage was similar, but the V3P-brace was slightly less worn. Discomfort was significantly lowered with the VER-brace. All knee braces relieved pain and symptoms from 10% to 40%. KAM angular impulse was reduced with the three braces, but the VER-brace obtained the lowest relative reduction of 9%. The interaction between time and wear indicated that part of the KAM reduction with brace wear was maintained post treatment. All three knee braces have great benefits for pain and function among the medial KOA population. The VER-brace offers additional advantages on daily use, comfort and KAM, which could improve compliance to brace treatment.     

The effect of functional knee-braces on strain on the anterior cruciate ligament in vivo.

Functional knee-braces are widely used to protect injured or reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments, despite the fact that few scientific data support their efficacy. We studied seven functional braces, representative of both the typical custom-fit and off-the-shelf designs. The braces were tested on subjects who had a normal anterior cruciate ligament and were scheduled for arthroscopic meniscectomy or exploration of the knee under local anesthesia. After the operative procedure, a Hall-effect strain-transducer was applied to the anterior cruciate ligament. Under low anterior shear loads, two braces provided some protective strain-shielding effect compared with no brace, but this strain-shielding effect did not occur at the higher anterior shear loads expected during the high-stress activities common to athletic events. The DonJoy, Townsend, C.Ti., and Lenox Hill braces demonstrated a strain-shielding effect on the anterior cruciate ligament with an internal torque of five newton-meters applied to the tibia. None of the braces had any effect on strain on the anterior cruciate ligament during active range of motion of the knee from 10 to 120 degrees or during isometric contraction of the quadriceps. Wearing of a brace did not produce an increase in the value for strain on the anterior cruciate ligament. For the activities that were evaluated in this study, none of the braces produced adverse effects on the anterior cruciate ligament, and there were no significant differences in the strain on the anterior cruciate ligament between the use of a custom-fit or an off-the-shelf brace design. There were no apparent advantages of the more expensive custom-made braces compared with the off-the-shelf designs.     

Clinical practice guidelines for rest orthosis,knee sleeves,and unloading knee braces in knee osteoarthritis

ObjectiveTo develop clinical practice guidelines concerning the use of bracing – rest orthosis, knee sleeves and unloading knee braces – for knee osteoarthritis.MethodsThe French Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Society (SOFMER) methodology, associating a systematic literature review, collection of everyday clinical practice, and external review by multidisciplinary expert panel, was used.ResultsFew high-level studies of bracing for knee osteoarthritis were found. No evidence exists for the effectiveness of rest orthosis. Evidence for knee sleeves suggests that they decrease pain in knee osteoarthritis, and their use is associated with subjective improvement. These actions do not appear to depend on a local thermal effect. The effectiveness of knee sleeves for disability is not demonstrated for knee osteoarthritis. Short- and mid-term follow-up indicates that valgus knee bracing decreases pain and disability in medial knee osteoarthritis, appears to be more effective than knee sleeves, and improves quality of life, knee proprioception, quadriceps strength, and gait symmetry, and decreases compressive loads in the medial femoro-tibial compartment. However, results of response to valgus knee bracing remain inconsistent; discomfort and side effects can result. Thrombophlebitis of the lower limbs has been reported with the braces. Braces, whatever kind, are infrequently prescribed in clinical practice for osteoarthritis of the lower limbs.ConclusionModest evidence exists for the effectiveness of bracing – rest orthosis, knee sleeves and unloading knee braces – for knee osteoarthritis, with only low level recommendations for its use. Braces are prescribed infrequently in French clinical practice for osteoarthritis of the knee. Randomized clinical trials concerning bracing in knee osteoarthritis are still necessary.     

The effect of derotation braces on knee motion

Four different types of derotation braces and an elastic knee support were tested on ice-hockey players. The elastic support did not noticeably affect rotation and abduction-adduction of the knee. All four braces reduced rotation and abduction-adduction in test actions simulating sports situations. Flexion-extension was slightly affected by two of the individually made braces in one action. Running a figure eight was slower with two of the individually made braces. The best braces, one individually made and one ready-made, limited rotation and abduction-adduction effectively, but did not affect performance. Minor differences in design may account for differences in effect and may alter the protection afforded by a brace.     

The effect of derotation braces on knee motion

Four different types of derotation braces and an elastic knee support were tested on ice-hockey players. The elastic support did not noticeably affect rotation and abduction-adduction of the knee. All four braces reduced rotation and abduction-adduction in test actions simulating sports situations. Flexion-extension was slightly affected by two of the individually made braces in one action. Running a figure eight was slower with two of the individually made braces. The best braces, one individually made and one ready-made, limited rotation and abduction-adduction effectively, but did not affect performance. Minor differences in design may account for differences in effect and may alter the protection afforded by a brace.     

"Custom-fit" versus "off-the-shelf" ACL functional braces

Many sports medicine practitioners believe "custom-fit" functional braces are superior in performance to "off-the-shelf" braces for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. However, this is not well substantiated. This study compares a Donjoy custom-fit ACL brace (CE 2000), Donjoy off-the-shelf brace (Goldpoint), and an athletic taping technique to determine their role in our clinical practice. Five patients (3 men and 2 women) with isolated, unilateral, chronic ACL tears with an average age of 27 years (range: 19-35 years) were used to evaluate these three restraint systems. Anterior tibial laxity, quadriceps and hamstrings strength, endurance, standing long jump, brace migration with exercise, and pattern of muscle response to forced anterior tibial displacement were studied. Each patient was tested without a brace and then in each of the three test conditions (custom brace, off-the-shelf brace, and tape), with the order of testing randomized. The Donjoy custom-fit ACL functional brace did not reduce anterior laxity or improve standing long jump, muscle strength, endurance, or muscle response times significantly more than the off-the-shelf ACL brace. Both braces improved anterior stability over knee taping when the knee muscles were contracted under the low forces used in this study. After 1 hour of exercise, brace migration was significantly greater (P=.03) for the CE-2000 custom brace (18.6 mm) than for the Goldpoint off-the-shelf brace (4.5 mm). There appears to be no advantage to the more expensive custom-fit knee brace over the off-the-shelf brace.     

Knee Bracing

The authors present an overview of the design and functional features of knee braces and their relationship to knee biomechanics. Four types of knee braces-prophylactic, rehabilitative, functional, and patellofemoral-have been developed to cover the wide variety of indications in patients who have suffered knee injuries or hope to prevent them. Important considerations when choosing specific brace types are discussed, and summaries of relevant research are presented. Clinical criteria for brace selection are offered to help physicians and sports medicine professionals in choosing the right brace for each patient.     

Using real‐time MRI to quantify altered joint kinematics in subjects with patellofemoral pain and to evaluate the effects of a patellar brace or sleeve on joint motion

Abnormal patellofemoral joint motion is a possible cause of patellofemoral pain, and patellar braces are thought to alleviate pain by restoring normal joint kinematics. We evaluated whether females with patellofemoral pain exhibit abnormal patellofemoral joint kinematics during dynamic, weight‐bearing knee extension and assessed the effects of knee braces on patellofemoral motion. Real‐time magnetic resonance (MR) images of the patellofemoral joints of 36 female volunteers (13 pain‐free controls, 23 patellofemoral pain) were acquired during weight‐bearing knee extension. Pain subjects were also imaged while wearing a patellar‐stabilizing brace and a patellar sleeve. We measured axial‐plane kinematics from the images. Females with patellofemoral pain exhibited increased lateral translation of the patella for knee flexion angles between 0°and 50° (p = 0.03), and increased lateral tilt for knee flexion angles between 0° and 20° (p = 0.04). The brace and sleeve reduced the lateral translation of the patella; however, the brace reduced lateral displacement more than the sleeve (p = 0.006). The brace reduced patellar tilt near full extension (p = 0.001), while the sleeve had no effect on patellar tilt. Our results indicate that some subjects with patellofemoral pain exhibit abnormal weight‐bearing joint kinematics and that braces may be effective in reducing patellar maltracking in these subjects. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27: 571–577, 2009     

The Lenox Hill derotation brace in chronic post-traumatic instability of the knee

Nine Lenox Hill derotation knee braces have been fitted for post-traumatic ligamentous instability of the knee. Eight of the patients found it an effective appliance for preventing their knees giving way, and wear it regularly. We would recommend this brace for cases of post-traumatic instability of the knee when the ligaments are at fault and provided that internal derangements such as meniscal tears or loose bodies have already been treated.