Breast cancer screening for Korean women must consider traditional risks as well as two genetic risk factors: genetic polymorphisms and inheritable gene mutations

Asian women worldwide have increasing rates of breast cancer due to acculturation which may be altering, gene to gene and/or, genetic and environmental interactions at the cellular level. The purpose of this integrative review is to alert nurses and physicians to rising rates of breast cancer among Korean women and to a need for breast health screening programs in the United States that are more culturally responsive and attentive to the effects of acculturation and genetic risk factors. A comprehensive review of the English and Korean literature pertaining to rising incidence of breast cancer among Korean women in their homeland and in the United States is retraced since 1983. Korean women in Korea and in the United States face similar barriers to cancer screening services. Korean women need knowledge about the effect of acculturation on breast cancer risk and patterns of familial inheritance of breast cancer. Screening is especially important among younger women (younger than age 35), those with a strong family history, and women in community settings where acculturation has its greatest impact. Nurse clinicians and researchers who aim to improve breast cancer screening among minority women must pay closer attention to these risk factors and design culturally competent services and evaluation research. In the United States and Korea, Korean nurses are needed to specialize in breast cancer screening as well as cancer genetic risk assessment and genetic counseling.     

Korean guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection

Now colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in males and the fourth most common cancer in females in Korea. Since most of colorectal cancers occur after the prolonged transformation of adenomas into carcinomas, early detection and removal of colorectal adenomas are one of the most effective methods to prevent colorectal cancer. Considering the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer and polyps in Korea, it is very important to establish Korean guideline for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection. The guideline was developed by the Korean Multi-Society Take Force and we tried to establish the guideline by evidence-based methods. Parts of the statements were draw by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Herein we discussed epidemiology of colorectal cancers and adenomas in Korea and optimal methods for screening of colorectal cancer and detection of adenomas including fecal occult blood tests, radiologic tests, and endoscopic examinations.     

CT colonography: screening in individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer

The use of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as a screening test for colorectal cancer is being advocated with growing enthusiasm by physicians and the public as stronger evidence of its validity and limited invasiveness emerges from the literature. Because the approach to surveillance of colorectal cancer depends on an individual’s degree of risk category, which depends on familial and personal histories, it seems logical that the diagnostic performance and cost efficacy of screening CTC may differ according to the characteristics of the target population. Although CTC seems a valid option in low- to average-risk populations, pending a careful assessment of its cost and estimates of its cost efficacy, there are some important issues that should be addressed when it comes to considering its use in high-risk patients. The expected larger number of induced colonoscopies and higher false-positive rates are likely to have a great influence on CTC costs, but if its implementation causes a dramatic increase in the number of patients willing to undergo screening, thanks to its acceptability, then the cost efficacy ratio may ultimately become competitive with all other screening strategies for colorectal cancer. We strongly feel that large and well-conducted trials are needed to clarify the role of CTC in screening patients at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer.     

Colorectal cancer screening.

Colorectal cancer is a common and devastating disease. Many authorities recommend screening asymptomatic person, although the benefit of such screening is without scientific validation. Each of the screening modalities available has been examined, and their merits and shortcomings have been discussed. Surveys have indicated that primary care physicians generally agree with screening asymptomatic patients, but only a minority actually comply with the recommendations. Patient acceptance also varies. Thus, while specialty boards and panels of experts attempt to arrive at policies for the general population, primary care physicians must interact with the individual patient. Until data from ongoing prospective screening studies are available and cost-benefit issues are resolved, screening for colorectal cancer will remain at the discretion of physicians and their patients. There is insufficient evidence to support either continuing or discontinuing the recommended examinations for asymptomatic patients. The screening examinations can be recommended on the basis of a theoretical benefit, however. They can be performed with a minimum of risk of injury or side effects. Certain patients can be identified as being at above-average risk and deserving of more consideration. If aware of the benefits and limitations of colorectal cancer screening, primary care physicians can decide how to implement colorectal cancer screening in their clinical practice.     

Key safety issues of bowel preparations for colonoscopy and importance of adequate hydration

Although screening colonoscopy is effective for early detection of colorectal cancer, screening rates remain low. Multiple factors are thought to be responsible for the low rates of screening colonoscopy, but bowel preparation appears to be a key deterrent. Tolerability issues with bowel preparations may lead to poor patient compliance, inadequate colon cleansing, and reduced detection of colonic polyps. Successful colon cleansing requires careful selection of the appropriate bowel purgative regimen, as well as patient acceptance of and compliance with the chosen regimen. The two major classes of bowel preparations include polyethylene glycol solutions and sodium phosphate preparations. Patient preference for tablet versus liquid formulations and medical history (e.g., renal impairment) should be considered when choosing the appropriate bowel preparation. Regardless of the bowel preparation administered, adequate hydration is important before, during, and after bowel preparation. Appropriate patient education regarding hydration and individualized patient instructions may increase compliance, reduce adverse events, promote successful bowel preparation for colonoscopy, and enhance the probability of a quality exam.     

Computed tomographic colonography for colorectal screening

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a specialized computed tomographic examination that has been optimized for the detection of colorectal polyps. The technology has undergone major advances in recent years and there is emerging consensus that state-of-the-art CTC results in performance characteristics comparable to those of optical colonoscopy for polyps > or = 8 mm in size. Effective polyp detection rests on the quality of several components of the examination, which must all be optimized in order to maintain appropriate sensitivity and specificity, including adequate bowel preparation, good colonic distension, sufficient scanning parameters, and appropriate interpretation. The emergence of CTC provides another method of colonic evaluation for colorectal cancer screening and prevention. In contrast to a mutually exclusive approach to screening, the availability of both optical colonoscopy and CTC should hopefully improve overall compliance rates for colorectal screening. The ultimate role of this technique in the screening program continues to evolve. There is currently considerable variability in the materials and methods used in CTC. This article describes the approach used at the University of Wisconsin, which has been validated in a large multicenter screening trial and which is currently used for an active CTC-based colorectal cancer screening program.     

Breast cancer screening barriers and disability

There is evidence that early detection from breast cancer screening is an effective means to reduce overall mortality from breast cancer. Findings from multiple research studies suggest that women with chronic disabling conditions are less likely to participate in breast cancer screening due to the multiple barriers they face. Barriers include those related to finances, environment, physical limitations, health carers' attitudes and lack of knowledge, and psychosocial issues. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the existing evidence of the barriers to breast cancer screening experienced by women with physical disabilities. Rehabilitation nurses that work with women who have chronic disabling conditions can be instrumental in eliminating these barriers to breast cancer screening through their efforts to promote health which is consistent with the philosophy of maximizing the health potential and quality of life of these women whose needs are often overlooked.     

Screening of patients at average risk for colon cancer

Both the incidence and the mortality from colorectal cancer can be substantially reduced by primary and secondary prevention. There are many screening tests for colorectal cancer, and any test should result in a reduction in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. If the age-eligible population undergoes these screening tests, the burden of colorectal cancer should be substantially reduced. The scientific evidence related to secondary prevention, specifically screening of individuals at average risk for colorectal cancer, is presently reviewed.     

Tests and investigations for colorectal cancer screening

Worldwide, colorectal (CRC) is the third most common form of cancer, after lung and breast cancer, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death, although in developed countries CRC incidence is higher and it accounts for an even higher proportion of cancer deaths. Successful treatment of early-stage CRC confers substantial survival advantage, and there is now overwhelming evidence that screening average-risk individuals for CRC reduces the incidence and disease-specific mortality. In spite of considerable research for new biomarkers for CRC, the detection of blood in faeces remains the most effective screening tool. The best evidence to date for population-based CRC screening comes from randomised-controlled trials that used a guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBt) as the first-line screening modality, whereby test-positive individuals are referred for follow-up investigations, usually colonoscopy. A major innovation in the last ten years or so has been the development of other more analytically sensitive and specific screening techniques for blood in faeces. The faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT) confers substantial benefits over gFOBt in terms of analytical sensitivity, specificity and practicality and FIT are now recommended for CRC screening by the European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. The challenge internationally is to develop high quality CRC screening programmes for which uptake is high. This is especially important for developing countries witnessing an increase in the incidence of CRC as populations adopt more westernised lifestyles.This review describes the tests available for CRC screening and how they are being used worldwide. The reader will gain an understanding of developments in CRC screening and issues that arise in choosing the most appropriate screening test (or tests) for organised population-based screening internationally and optimising the performance of the chosen test (or tests). Whilst a wide range of literature has been cited, this is not a systematic review. The authors provide FOBT CRC screening for a population of 14.6 million in the south of England and the senior author (SPH) was the lead author of the European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis and leads the World Endoscopy Organization Colorectal Cancer Committee’s Expert Working Group on ‘FIT for Screening’.     

Secondary prevention of cancer

OBJECTIVES: To review criteria for mass cancer screening among asymptomatic populations and barriers to secondary prevention of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. To describe challenges to implementing theoretically based interventions to increase appropriate cancer screening, follow-up, and surveillance. DATA SOURCES: Published journal articles, text books, and epidemiologic reports. CONCLUSION: Interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening participation must be approached from a systems perspective that includes patient, health care provider, and health care system variables. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Understanding the array of factors that impede progress in the secondary prevention of cancer is necessary to improve care. Nurses have an important role in decreasing morbidity and mortality from breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers.     

乳腺磁共振背景实质强化的研究进展

乳腺癌作为女性最常见的恶性肿瘤,其发病率及死亡率都较高,且不同分子亚型乳腺癌生物学表现及临床治疗、预后各不相同,寻找乳腺癌针对性和个性化诊断及治疗的影像学标记物是目前研究的热点。乳腺背景实质强化(background parenchymal enhancement,BPE)是正常纤维腺体组织的生理性强化,受多种因素的影响,并在乳腺疾病的诊断及治疗预后方面有着重要的诊断价值,BPE水平升高与乳腺癌发病风险相关,并可能评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗的疗效。作者就BPE的影响因素及在乳腺癌筛查、诊断及治疗评估中的作用加以综述。     

Stool screening for colorectal cancer: evolution from occult blood to molecular markers.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of malignant death, and better preventive strategies are needed. Participation rates for colorectal cancer screening remain low due, in part, to perceived discomfort, potential harm, and high costs with available tools. METHODS: Stool testing, unlike other conventional screening approaches, is noninvasive and requires no cathartic preparation. However, widely used fecal blood tests yield frequent false-negative and false-positive results that lower screening effectiveness and raise program costs. There is a compelling biological rationale to target DNA alterations exfoliated from neoplasms into stool, and multiple DNA markers would need to be assayed because of the genetic heterogeneity of colorectal neoplasia. Early clinical studies with this multi-target DNA-based stool assay approach suggest high sensitivity for both colorectal cancer and premalignant adenomatous polyps while maintaining high specificity. CONCLUSIONS: This apparently accurate and user-friendly new approach holds promise to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and appeal of colorectal cancer screening. Large-scale clinical studies are clearly warranted to corroborate the early results.     

Cancer screening guidelines

Numerous medical organizations have developed cancer screening guidelines. Faced with the broad, and sometimes conflicting, range of recommendations for cancer screening, family physicians must determine the most reasonable and up-to-date method of screening. Major medical organizations have generally achieved consensus on screening guidelines for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer. For breast cancer screening in women ages 50 to 70, clinical breast examination and mammography are generally recommended every one or two years, depending on the medical organization. For cervical cancer screening, most organizations recommend a Papanicolaou test and pelvic examination at least every three years in patients between 20 and 65 years of age. Annual fecal occult blood testing along with flexible sigmoidoscopy at five-year to 10-year intervals is the standard recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in patients older than 50 years. Screening for prostate cancer remains a matter of debate. Some organizations recommend digital rectal examination and a serum prostate-specific antigen test for men older than 50 years, while others do not. In the absence of compelling evidence to indicate a high risk of endometrial cancer, lung cancer, oral cancer and ovarian cancer, almost no medical organizations have developed cancer screening guidelines for these types of cancer.     

Breast cancer risk factors in Korean women: a literature review

Aim:  To compile a complete list of risk factors from the Korean breast cancer studies to obtain relevant predictor information essential in developing a predictive model for breast cancer.
Background:  Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed female cancer in Korea. However, the breast cancer-screening rate in Korea is relatively low compared with that in other countries. In order to promote early health screening, there is a need to identify those individuals who are most likely to develop breast cancer by using an accurate predictive model.
Methods:  Thirty-four breast cancer studies were selected from MEDLINE and two Korean literature databases. Two researchers summarized the risk factors and their effects in each article using a checklist.
Findings:  Most of the studies were case–control studies conducted after 2000. In 34 articles, a total of 84 risk factors for breast cancer in Korean women were identified; of these, 58 factors were determined as statistically significant factors. The factors identified most often were body mass index, menarche, menopause, family history, pregnancy and delivery, breastfeeding, alcohol use, smoking habits, diet, education and use of oral contraceptives. None of 34 studies looked at stress as a risk factor of which influence on cancer has been reported in other populations.
Conclusion:  The next steps will be to construct a questionnaire consisting of relevant variables based on these study results and to develop a predictive model. This would be used to encourage those Koreans who are more likely to develop breast cancer to have early check-ups.     

Breast cancer incidence: what do the figures mean?

ABSTRACT RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Against the background of a general rise in the incidence of breast cancer temporal variations appear in different age groups, including changes attributable to the introduction of breast screening. This paper attempts to distinguish the influence of breast screening and to examine any underlying patterns. METHODS: The incidence data published by the Office of National Statistics for England and Wales have been examined using the method of least squares regression. These data have been subjected to major revision: a new system was introduced in 1971. That year, therefore, has been taken as the starting point for the analyses. Regression lines were fitted from 1971, 1984 and 1988 (when breast screening was started). Results Between 1971 and 1984 breast cancer incidence was unchanged in women under 50 years. In all other age groups and time periods the incidence has risen throughout 1971-1999. The rate of increase remained constant for women over 64 but changed in 1984 for all women under 65 years. The rate of increase is rising exponentially with age since 1984 in the women under 65. The superimposed increases due to screening have been separated from the underlying rates. CONCLUSIONS: In the period surveyed there appears to have been a change in the rates of increase in incidence of breast cancer in women under 65 that dates from 1984. This change can be separated from the spurious increase due to breast screening. The rates in women over 64 have remained constant.     

Breast cancer screening

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the United States; however, recent data demonstrates a decline in the mortality rate, which may be attributed to early detection from screening programs combined with effective therapies for early stage disease. As a result of the prevalence of breast cancer and its association with highly emotional issues, screening recommendations have aroused debate in the scientific, public, and legislative domains. A general consensus supports breast cancer screening among women between the ages of 50 and 70; however, much controversy exists regarding screening for women age 40 to 49 or above age 70. This article explores the issues involved in determining breast cancer screening recommendations among asymptomatic women with average risk in the United States.     

Relative Survival With Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Screened and Unscreened Populations

Relative survival and disease-specific survival are two statistics that measure net survival from a cancer diagnosis, excluding other causes of death. In most cases, these two rates are comparable. However, in some cancer types for which cancer screening is performed, relative survival is often greater than disease-specific survival. This divergence has been attributed to mechanisms such as the “healthy user effect” and overdiagnosis of indolent tumors detected by screening. Using relative survival rate as a marker of these mechanisms, we examined the association of breast cancer screening with relative survival rates for women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. In population-based data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry, we examined relative survival rates in women diagnosed with stage I breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ who were in highly screened vs less-highly screened groups, based on time period, age group, and insurance status. In this analysis, relative survival rates for early-stage breast cancer were higher than disease-specific survival, even exceeding 100% in populations experiencing higher rates of screening (ie, women diagnosed during the era of widespread uptake of mammography, age older than 40 years, and women with health insurance coverage). The favorable outcomes observed in screen-detected breast cancers are at least in part attributable to the healthy user effect and overdiagnosis of indolent tumors. Therefore, survival rates may not accurately reflect the effectiveness of cancer screening. These findings have implications for counseling of patients and future clinical studies of active monitoring approaches in breast cancer.     

Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy and polypectomy are the most effective tools available to prevent colorectal cancer. The technical performance of colonoscopy can be improved by methods that make polyp detection easier and more reliable, facilitate cecal intubation, and reduce recurrence and complication rates after polypectomy. The state-of-the-art and possible future trends in patient preparation, indications, screening and surveillance intervals, sedation issues, and virtual colonoscopy are reviewed in this article.     

Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study

Setting Participants with a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) have a high risk for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. They are therefore recommended follow-up by colonoscopy. However, more than ten percent of positively screened persons do not adhere to this advice.Objective To investigate FIT-positive individuals’ motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice in the Dutch CRC screening program.Subjects Non-adherent FIT-positive participants of the Dutch CRC screening program.Design We conducted semi structured in-depth interviews with 17 persons who did not undergo colonoscopy within 6 months after a positive FIT. Interviews were undertaken face-to-face and data were analysed thematically with open coding and constant comparison.Results All participants had multifactorial motives for non-adherence. A preference for more personalised care was described with the following themes: aversion against the design of the screening program, expectations of personalised care, emotions associated with experiences of impersonal care and a desire for counselling where options other than colonoscopy could be discussed. Furthermore, intrinsic motives were: having a perception of low risk for CRC (described by all participants), aversion and fear of colonoscopy, distrust, reluctant attitude to the treatment of cancer and cancer fatalism. Extrinsic motives were: having other health issues or priorities, practical barriers, advice from a general practitioner (GP) and financial reasons.Conclusion Personalised screening counselling might have helped to improve the interviewees’ experiences with the screening program as well as their knowledge on CRC and CRC screening. Future studies should explore whether personalised screening counselling also has potential to increase adherence rates.

Key points

• Participants with a positive FIT in two-step colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs are at high risk for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. Non-adherence after an unfavourable screening result happens in all CRC programs worldwide with the consequence that many of the participants do not undergo colonoscopy for the definitive assessment of the presence of colorectal cancer. Little qualitative research has been done to study the reasons why individuals participate in the first step of the screening but not in the second step. We found a preference for more personalised care, which was not reported in previous literature on this subject. Furthermore, intrinsic factors, such as a low risk perception and distrust, and extrinsic factors, such as the presence of other health issues and GP advice, may also play a role in non-adherence. A person-centred approach in the form of a screening counselling session may be beneficial for this group of CRC screening participants.