Treatment of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancer

Excellent local control rates of interstitial brachytherapy in oral cavity cancer and oropharyngeal carcinoma have been demonstrated in different retrospective studies. Compared to external-beam radiation therapy the high local control rates with a low rate of side effects obtained by interstitial brachytherapy are the result of a steep dose reduction in the implant-surrounding normal tissues. Therefore, interstitial brachytherapy offers rather the possibility to give high doses without inevitably leading to high complication rates. Low-dose-rate (LDR) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) interstitial brachytherapy with 0.4-0.55 Gy/h/24 h for tumors of the oral cavity and oropharynx in selected patients is a proven, effective and safe treatment method with excellent long-term data both as a sole treatment modality and a postoperative method, as well as a unique treatment method of head and neck tumors in previously irradiated areas. This paper deals with the technical aspects of interstitial brachytherapy, that seem to be relevant to high-quality outcome, and gives an overview of indications as well as past and recent results of interstitial brachytherapy in head and neck cancer.     

Interstitial Brachytherapy with Ir-192 Low-Dose-Rate in the Treatment of Primary and Recurrent Cancer the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx

AIM: To evaluate the impact of postoperative interstitial brachytherapy with and without external radiotherapy in the treatment of primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1997, a total of 318 patients were treated by interstitial Ir-192 low-dose-rate brachytherapy as part of their primary (n = 236) or recurrent treatment (n = 82). There were 263 male (83%) and 55 (17%) female patients. The distribution of UICC (1997) stages was as follows: I (61 patients, 19%), II (71 patients, 22%), III (58 patients, 18%), IV (128 patients, 40%). The primary tumor site was located in the oral cavity in 201 patients (63%), in the oropharynx in 86 patients (27%), lower lip in 19 patients (6%) and other regions in twelve cases (4%). Treatment concepts did not vary over the time and were dictated by the initial tumor extension: a total of 175 patients (55%) received a combination of surgery, interstitial brachytherapy (23-25 Gy) and external radiotherapy (50-60 Gy), 60 patients (19%) surgery and interstitial brachytherapy (45-55 Gy) alone. Advanced disease not amenable to primary surgery was either treated by radiochemotherapy and interstitial brachytherapy in 39 patients (12%) or a combination of interstitial brachytherapy, external radiotherapy and interstitial hyperthermia in 44 patients (14%). RESULTS: Overall survival rates following primary and recurrent treatment were 50 +/- 4% and 29 +/- 5%, respectively, at 5 years (p < 0.0001). A significant impact on overall survival rate was noted for UICC stage: patients in stage I/II had survival rates of 64 +/- 5% and 57 +/- 10%, respectively, while patients in stage III/IV had survival rates of 39 +/- 5% and 15 +/- 5%, respectively, at 5 years (p < 0.0001). In addition, grading (p = 0.01) and hemoglobin levels (p = 0.05) had a significant influence on overall survival. Local tumor control rates for all patients were 74 +/- 3% and 57 +/- 7% at 5 years following primary and recurrent treatment (p = 0.01), respectively. The 145 patients treated for primary disease by a uniform concept of surgery, interstitial brachytherapy and external radiotherapy achieved excellent local control rates with 92 +/- 4% (stage I/II) and 65 +/- 6% (stage III/IV) at 5 years. Late treatment-related toxicity with soft tissue necrosis and/or osteonecrosis requiring mandibular resection was 7.5%. CONCLUSION: Local tumor excision followed by postoperative interstitial brachytherapy with and without external radiotherapy is associated with excellent locoregional control, a low risk of chronic sequelae and may therefore considered as a new approach avoiding mutilating radical surgery.     

The Role of Interstitial Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Vaginal and Vulvar Malignancies

BACKGROUND: Irradiation has established itself as a treatment for vulvar and vaginal malignancies. Due to the sensitive nature of the vulvar and vaginal tissues, interstitial brachytherapy (iBT) provides an effective, gentle and individualized therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with vulvar (nine of 22) and vaginal (13 of 22) malignancies were treated using interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-iBT). Twelve out of 22 patients were additionally treated using external-beam therapy to the pelvis and regional lymph nodes. The median total dose of PDR-iBT administered to patients with vulvar carcinoma was 55.0 Gy. The median total PDR dose administered to patients with vaginal malignancies amounted to 20.25 Gy. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for patients with vulvar cancer was 19 months and for patients with vaginal malignancies 27 months. Acute mucositis or skin reactions during iBT were observed in 15 of 22 patients. Two of 22 patients showed delayed side effects. After 6 months, 77.8% of the patients with vulvar cancer (seven out of nine) and 100% of the patients with vaginal malignancies (13 out of 13) achieved complete local remission. One patient out of nine with vulvar carcinoma developed local recurrence, four out of nine regional recurrence, and two out of nine developed regional recurrence and had local tumor following therapy. In patients with malignancies of the vagina, no cases of local recurrence were observed, but distant metastases were found in five out of 13 patients. At the time of analysis, eleven out of 22 patients with vulvar or vaginal carcinoma were still alive. CONCLUSION: IBT achieved good local control without serious delayed side effects in both localizations. However, survival is limited by regional or distant metastases.     

Palliative Interstitial HDR Brachytherapy for Recurrent Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE: To report the methods and clinical results of CT-based interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy procedures for the palliative treatment of recurrent rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 44 brachytherapy implants were performed in 38 patients. CT-guided catheter implants were performed in 34 patients under local anesthesia and sedation, and four patients were implanted intraoperatively. Of 40 CT-guided implants, 20 were done using metallic needles introduced via the sacrum and 20 were transperineal implants of plastic tubes in the presacral region. Postimplant CT scans were used for three-dimensional (3-D) conformal brachytherapy planning. Patients implanted with metallic needles were given a single fraction of 10-15 Gy using HDR (192)Ir, and those who received transperineal implants of plastic catheters were given fractionated brachytherapy, 5 Gy twice daily to a total dose of 30-40 Gy. The median tumor volume was 225 cm(3) with a range of 41-2,103 cm(3). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 23.4 months, a total of 13/38 patients were alive. The median postbrachytherapy survival was 15 months with 18 of the 25 deaths due to distant metastases. Tumor response was as follows: 6/38 partial remission, 28/38 stable disease, and 4/38 local progression. A planning target volume (PTV) coverage > 85% was achieved in 42/44 implants. The treatment was well tolerated, and no acute complications were observed. One patient developed a fistula after 8 months. Pain relief was recorded in 34 patients (89.5%), and the median duration of this palliative effect was 5 months with a range of 1-13 months. CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial HDR brachytherapy is a valuable tool for the delivery of high doses and achieves effective palliation in recurrent rectal carcinoma.     

High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Penile Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Interstitial low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy allows conservative treatment of T1-T2 penile carcinoma. High dose-rate (HDR) is often considered to be dangerous for interstitial implants because of a higher risk of complications, but numerous reports suggest that results may be comparable to LDR. Nevertheless, there are no data in the literature available regarding HDR interstitial brachytherapy for carcinoma of the penis. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old man with T1 N0 M0 epidermoid carcinoma of the glans is reported. Interstitial HDR brachytherapy was performed using the stainless hollow needle technique and a breast template for fixation and good geometry. The dose delivered was 18 x 3 Gy twice daily. RESULTS: After 232 days from brachytherapy, the patient was without any evidence of the tumor, experienced no serious radiation-induced complications, and had a fully functional organ. CONCLUSION: HDR interstitial brachytherapy is feasible in selected case of penis carcinoma, when careful planning and small single fractions are used.     

Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Base of Tongue Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:. To date none of the studies examined the feasibility and efficacy of interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the tongue base. Therefore the aim of this study was to contribute to this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS:. Between 1992 and 2000 37 patients (mean age 55 years) with T1-4 and N0-3 carcinoma of the base of tongue were presented. Neck dissection was carried out in twelve cases (32%). 30 patients with advanced stage received brachytherapy boost after 50-66.5 Gy (mean, 60 Gy) locoregional external beam irradiation (EBI) and 7 patients with early stage (T1-2, N0) were managed locally with wide tumor excision and sole brachytherapy. 4 of them underwent neck dissection and the others were subjected to 50 Gy regional EBI. The mean dose of boost and sole brachytherapy was 18 Gy and 28 Gy, respectively. RESULTS:. The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 51 months. The 7 sole brachytherapy patients are living with no evidence of disease. For patients treated with EBI and brachytherapy boost, the 5-year actuarial rate of local, locoregional recurrence-free and overall survival was 60%, 52% and 46%, respectively. For all patients in univariate analysis larger tumor size (T4 vs. T1-3) was significant negative predictor of local (RR: 7.23) and locoregional control (RR: 3.87), but nodal involvement was not. Delayed soft tissue ulceration and osteoradionecrosis occurred in 4 (13%) EBI and brachytherapy treated patients. None of the sole brachytherapy patients experienced severe late radiation toxicity. CONCLUSION:. EBI combined with interstitial HDR brachytherapy boost result in acceptable local tumor control with low incidence of late side effects in patients with advanced disease. Fractionated sole HDR brachytherapy following tumor excision is a feasible treatment option for patients with early stage cancer and gives excellent local results.     

Health-Related Quality of Life after Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: To determine dosimetric risk factors for increased toxicity after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quality of life questionnaires (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) of 60 and 56 patients were analyzed after a median posttreatment time of 6 weeks (A-acute) and 16 months (L-late). The corresponding CT scans were performed 30 days after the implant. The prostate, rectal wall, and base of seminal vesicles were contoured. Prostate volume, number of seeds and needles as well as dosimetric parameters were correlated with the morbidity scores. RESULTS: For a prostate volume of 38 +/- 12 cm(3) (mean +/- standard deviation), 54 +/- 7 (125)I sources (Rapid Strands), activity of 22.6 +/- 3.0 MBq [0.61 +/- 0.08 mCi]) were implanted using 20 +/- 6 needles. Improved late urinary function scores resulted from a higher number of sources per cm(3) (> or = 1.35). A prostate D(90) < 170 Gy (A)/< 185 Gy (L) and base of seminal vesicle D(10) < 190 Gy (A and L) were associated with higher urinary function scores. Late rectal function scores were significantly higher for patients with a prostate V(200) < 50% and V(150) < 75%. Patients with a prostate volume < 40 cm(3) reached better sexual function scores (A and L). A higher number of needles per cm(3) (> or = 0.5) resulted in improved late urinary, bowel and sexual function scores. CONCLUSION: Quality of life after a permanent implant can be improved by using an adequate amount of sources and needles. With an increasing number of seeds per cm(3), dose homogeneity is improving. A prostate D(90) < 170 Gy and a base of seminal vesicle D(10) < 190 Gy (as an indicator of the dose to the bladder neck and urethral sphincter) can be recommended to maintain a satisfactory urinary function.     

Feasibility and Early Results of Interstitial Intensity-Modulated HDR/PDR Brachytherapy (IMBT) with/without Complementary External-Beam Radiotherapy and Extended Surgery in Recurrent Pelvic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND: A new multimodality treatment concept consisting of extended resection and postoperative fractionated intensity-modulated interstitial brachytherapy (IMBT) was introduced for pelvic recurrence of colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 46 patients received extended resection and single plastic tubes were sutured directly onto the tumor bed. IMBT was started within 2 weeks postoperatively with a median dose of 24.5 Gy (5-35 Gy). Patients were treated either with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR; n = 23) or with pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR; n = 23). 25 patients received complementary 45-Gy external-beam irradiation (EBRT) to the pelvic region after explanting the plastic tubes. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 20.6 months (7-107 months) and mean patient survival 25.7 +/- 25.8 months (median 17, range 1-107 months). After 5 years overall survival, disease-free survival and local control rate were 23%, 20% and 33%, significantly influenced by the resectional state. There was a trend in favor of PDR compared to HDR, which reached statistical significance in patients who had not received additional EBRT. CONCLUSION: The combination of extended surgery and postoperative interstitial IMBT is feasible and offers effective interdisciplinary treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer. In this small and inhomogeneous cohort of patients PDR seems to be more effective than HDR, particularly when application of complementary EBRT is not possible. None of the patients who required resection of distant metastasis survived > 2 years in this study.     

Ultrasound-Guided Interstitial Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Vaginal Recurrences from Cervical and Endometrial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: In advanced vaginal recurrences of cervical and endometrial carcinomas therapeutic options are rare because of preceding therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 23 patients developing advanced vaginal recurrences of cervical and endometrial carcinomas were included. 15 patients started with external-beam therapy to the pelvis and eight patients after preceding radiotherapy underwent brachytherapy alone. All patients had ultrasound-guided implantation of transvaginal or transperineal interstitial needles for brachytherapy. Median prescribed total dose was 64 Gy. RESULTS: 18 patients (78%) achieved complete remission. Six patients are alive without tumor and one with tumor after a median follow-up of 64 months. 14 patients died of tumor and two of intercurrent disease. 5-year disease-specific survival and local control rate were 43% and 47%, respectively, in patients with complete remission. Univariate analysis found time to relapse > 2 years, initial diameter < or = 4 cm, initial volume < 15 cm(3), no extension to the pelvic side wall, volume before brachytherapy < 7.5 cm(3), brachytherapy coverage index > 0.8, and prescribed total dose > 64 Gy being positive predictors for local control and survival. CONCLUSION: The use of ultrasound guidance for placement of interstitial needles in template-based brachytherapy of advanced recurrent gynecologic malignancies is a feasible, safe, and cheap method with encouraging results. Today, ultrasound imaging can be also used to some extent for treatment planning which requires further development. Patient- and treatment-related prognostic factors can be defined.