腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝的疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝的方法及疗效。 方法2017年5月至2019年5月,解放军总医院第四医学中心采用腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝11例。患者均为永久性造瘘,其中8例为低位直肠癌行Miles术式后的乙状结肠末端造瘘,3例为膀胱癌行回肠代膀胱术后的回肠末端造瘘。2例患者既往曾行造口旁疝修补术后复发。末次术后3.5~4.0年,平均3.75年。疝环最长径为4~8 cm,平均5.55 cm。 结果11例均以腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术成功完成腹壁重建手术。手术时间110~190 min,平均141.55 min;术后住院时间6~18 d,平均10 d。术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无肠瘘及腹壁感染发生。2例（18.2%）发生血清肿。随访时间6~23个月,平均随访14.55个月。11例患者术后未见造口旁疝复发或发生其他切口疝。 结论腹腔镜与开放杂交应用Sublay&Onlay-Keyhole术原位修补造口旁疝是腹壁重建的有效方法,具有复发率低、并发症少等优点,但远期疗效仍需进一步观察随访。     

腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术13例报告

目的探讨采用腹腔镜钥匙孔手术行造口旁疝修补术的可行性。方法回顾性分析2007年11月～2011年10月采用钥匙孔技术及Proceed补片完成的13例腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术的临床资料。2例回肠代膀胱造瘘,11例左下腹永久性乙状结肠造瘘,其中1例为造口旁疝修补术后复发。术中游离疝周粘连后,将补片适当修剪,中间留圆孔,置于疝囊下方,用5mm螺旋钉枪固定于腹壁。结果所有患者均顺利完成手术。术中并发症2例：横结肠系膜血管损伤1例,造瘘肠管损伤1例;术后并发症3例：切口感染1例,血清肿2例。术后随访5-52个月,平均26个月,1例复发,1例死于肺部感染。结论采用腹腔镜钥匙孔手术及Proceed补片行腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术是安全可行的,临床疗效较为满意,在降低造口旁疝修补术后补片相关并发症发生率和复发率方面具有一定的意义。     

腹腔镜下回肠袋膀胱造口旁疝补片修补术初步体会

目的 探讨腹腔镜下回肠袋膀胱造口旁疝补片修补术的有效性和安全性.方法 2004年9月至2006年12月,共对18例造口旁疝进行腹腔镜补片修补术,其中回肠袋膀胱造口旁疝3例.结果 3例均修补成功.手术时间45～90 min,平均63.3 min.疝环直径4～5 cm,平均4.5 cm.术后暂时性腹胀1例;1例修补区域腹壁明显疼痛,2周内缓解;1例血清肿,经2次穿刺抽液并加压包扎后治愈,无血肿发生,未发生与手术相关的感染.术后住院时间3～5 d,平均4 d;术后随访17～25个月,平均21.3月,未见复发.结论 腹腔镜下回肠袋膀胱的造口旁疝补片修补术从技术上讲是安全、可行的,早期的临床结果较理想.     

腹腔镜下CK Parastomal补片修补造口旁疝疗效分析

目的总结腹腔镜下应用CK Parastomal补片修补造口旁疝的手术方法及临床疗效。方法回顾分析2006年6月-2010年3月24例于腹腔镜下应用CK Parastomal补片修补造口旁疝患者的临床资料。男15例,女9例;年龄47～80岁,中位年龄55岁。左下腹结肠造口旁疝19例,右下腹回肠造口旁疝5例。发生造口旁疝时间1～4年,平均2.4年。疝环最大径3～7 cm,平均5.2 cm。均无疝修补史。结果 18例成功完成腹腔镜下修补,6例因腹腔内广泛致密粘连转为开放手术。手术时间78～178 min,平均121 min。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。术后3～7 d 8例发生浆液肿,均经穿刺抽吸后消失。术后1个月内11例出现修补区域腹壁疼痛,均自行消失。24例患者术后均获随访,随访时间6～39个月,平均27个月。术后3个月1例复发,其余患者随访期间均无复发。结论 腹腔镜下应用CK Parastomal补片修补造口旁疝是一种安全、可行的方法,可获得较好的近期疗效,但远期效果尚需进一步观察。     

腹腔内放置复合补片原位修补巨大造口旁疝八例

目的总结应用复合补片腹腔内修补巨大造口旁疝的经验。方法回顾性分析复合补片经腹腔内修补巨大造口旁疝8例的临床资料,其中男性6例,女性2例,年龄46～63岁,平均54.7岁。患者均因直肠癌行Miles手术后发生造口旁疝,疝病史3～8年,其中复发性造口旁疝2例。疝环最大径11～15 cm,平均12.6 cm。根据疝环大小选择合适补片,补片边缘均超出疝环缘3 cm以上。在补片中心剪-3 cm直径的孔,并在孔的一侧剪开补片,将补片中心孔套入造口肠管,补片其他部分覆盖住腹壁缺损,补片聚四氟乙烯面朝向腹腔,聚丙烯面朝向腹壁。用2-0的Prolene线连续缝合补片被剪开的一侧裂口,并将补片中心孔的聚四氟乙烯材料缘与造口肠管用3-0的可吸收线间断缝合固定4～5针。然后用1-0的Prolene线经全腹壁穿刺缝合方式,将补片铺平并固定于腹壁,间隔距离5 mm。多余皮肤行适当整形。结果手术时间97～146min,平均109 min。伤口均一期愈合,1例发生浆液肿,2例发生术后近期修补区刺痛。随访3～27个月,平均20个月,无复发。结论复合补片经腹腔内修补巨大造口旁疝是一种安全有效的方法。     

腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝修补的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝修补的临床价值。方法我院2011年5月~2016年3月对12例造瘘口旁疝行腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝修补,腹腔镜下松解和游离肠管周围粘连,松解疝囊及造瘘肠管周围粘连,并将疝内容物回纳至腹腔,腹腔内置入带有刻度的硬膜外麻醉导管,测量疝环的大小和造瘘肠管的粗细。根据测量结果将疝补片裁剪后送入腹腔,环绕造口肠管,覆盖缺损区域腹壁,固定补片。结果 12例手术均取得成功,术中发现疝环直径3.5~8.5 cm,平均5.7 cm。手术时间55~100 min,平均70 min。住院时间3~9 d,平均5.2 d。12例随访3个月~4年,中位随访时间3年2个月,无死亡、复发。结论腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝修补术安全、可行,临床效果满意。     

腹腔镜下造口旁疝补片修补术应用体会

目的探讨腹腔镜下造口旁疝修补术的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2007年9月至2010年4月期间8例行腹腔镜下造瘘口旁疝补片修补术患者的临床资料,分析手术情况、术后并发症及复发情况。结果 8例造口旁疝患者均在腹腔镜下修补成功。手术时间50～180min,平均135min。疝环大小4.5～6.5cm,平均5.0cm。术后1例出现肠梗阻及复发,后行腹腔镜探查及再次修补术。2例术后早期出现腹胀,1周后腹胀缓解。1例术后出现术区疼痛不适,对症治疗后缓解。本组未发生术区感染。住院时间5～14d,平均7.6d。术后随访1年,除1例复发后行再次手术外,均未见复发。结论腹腔镜下造口旁疝修补术如果注意操作要点,可以替代传统修补术。     

新型Dual Lap修补手术治疗成人复杂造口旁疝的临床研究

目的 探讨新型腹腔镜联合开腹杂交手术修补方法(Dual Lap)治疗成人复杂造口旁疝的可行性和临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2021年1月期间，采用开腹经腹壁修补和腹腔镜修补相结合的杂交手术修补方式(即Dual Lap术式)治疗的21例成人复杂造口旁疝临床资料。其中男性16例，女性5例；年龄(63.6±5.2)岁(51～78岁);其中膀胱癌术后回肠代膀胱造口病人3例，结直肠癌术后结肠造口病人15例，溃疡性结肠炎全结肠切除术后永久性回肠造口病人2例，家族性结肠息肉病全结肠切除术后永久性回肠造口病人1例；嵌顿性造口旁疝6例，复发造口旁疝4例，合并腹壁切口疝11例。结果 21例病人Dual Lap杂交修补手术均顺利完成，术中探查造口旁疝疝环直径为(6.8±1.7) cm(3～15 cm),切口疝疝环直径为(4.8±1.3) cm(3～7 cm),手术修补时间为(100.7±21.5) min(90～140 min);术中无肾脏、输尿管及肠管损伤；术后72 h内疼痛需使用镇痛剂辅助治疗的病人8例，使用时间3 d;术后住院时间为(8.1±2.7) d(7～13 d);术后7 d时所有...     

腹壁疝补片修补术后感染的外科处理

目的总结腹壁疝补片修补术后感染的外科处理方法及经验。方法回顾性分析我科2007年6月至2010年5月期间16例腹壁疝补片修补术后感染并接受外科处理的患者的临床资料,其中男10例,女6例;年龄24～73岁,平均45.2岁。其中腹壁切口疝补片修补术后感染11例,腹壁肿瘤切除术后腹壁缺损补片修补术后感染4例,回肠代膀胱造口旁疝补片修补术后感染并尿瘘1例。患者表现有补片暴露、慢性流脓、腹壁慢性窦道及肠皮瘘,均就诊于初次手术的医生,经局部换药处理后3～24个月未愈。患者在我科接受了根治性感染网片切除及腹壁重建术。结果所有患者均将感染补片取出,5例采用成分分离技术自体组织游离修补,4例同时应用聚丙烯平片加强修补,5例同时行脱细胞基质生物补片修补,1例未行修补给予切口创面负压吸引加局部换药,1例去除补片后未行加强修补直接缝合关闭切口。术后住院时间9～25d,平均14d。术后切口一期愈合13例,其余3例切口经局部换药二期愈合。随访6～34个月,平均22个月,无疝复发。结论腹壁疝或缺损补片修补术后感染的外科处理非常棘手,需根据患者个体具体情况处理方可取得满意效果。     

腹腔镜下造口旁疝补片修补术

目的探讨腹腔镜下造口旁疝补片修补术的效果。方法2004年9月-2005年12月，对7例造口旁疝进行腹腔镜补片修补术。结果6例修补成功，1例因腹腔内广泛致密粘连而中转为剖腹缝合修补。手术时间45-180min，平均109min。疝环直径4-6cm，平均5．6cm。术后暂时性腹胀2例；5例修补区域腹壁疼痛，3周内明显缓解；4例血清肿，经2-4次穿刺抽液并加压包扎后治愈。无血肿发生，未发生与手术相关的感染。术后住院时间3-8d，平均5．1d；术后随访2-15个月，平均8．3月，未见复发。结论腹腔镜造口旁疝补片修补术技术上安全、可行，早期的临床疗效较理想。     

腹腔镜造口旁疝补片修补术的临床体会

目的:探讨腹腔镜造口旁疝补片修补术的手术方法和临床效果.方法:回顾分析2008年6月至2010年10月为38例患者施行腹腔镜造口旁疝补片修补术的临床资料.结果:35例顺利完成腹腔镜手术,3例中转开腹,其中2例腹腔内广泛致密粘连,1例肠管损伤.手术时间60～125 min,平均90 min;疝环直径4～9 cm,平均6 ...     

A modified sublay–keyhole technique for in situ parastomal hernia repair

Objective

The surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia is always challenging due to the high incidence of recurrence following primary repair, or stoma relocation and severe morbidities in prosthetic repair with polypropylene materials. We therefore developed a modified sublay–keyhole technique employing a polypropylene material to minimize the associated high risk of the procedure. We herein describe our initial clinical experience with this modified procedure.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed to obtain the clinical data for 11 patients with parastomal hernias who underwent the modified in situ Sublay–keyhole repair from November 2008 to August 2010.

Results

The mean hernia size was 58.7?cm² (range 30–96?cm²), with an average polypropylene mesh size of 376.3?cm² (range 270–464?cm²). The mean length of the operation was 147.9?min (range 120–195.0?min), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 11?days (range 9–14?days). All patients had an uneventful incisional recovery, with no infections. Two seromas and one hematoma were found and treated with conservative management, such as with aspiration, physical therapy and compression. All patients had been followed up, with a mean length of follow-up of 23.5?months (range 11–39?months). One parastomal hernia recurrence was seen 11?months postoperatively. Breakdown of the sutures and an over-sized aperture cut in the mesh were detected as the causes of the recurrence during the secondary repair procedure. Only re-sutures in both the mesh aperture and myofascial dehiscence were executed for this patient, and no re-recurrence was observed during an additional follow-up of 15?months. No recurrence of the parastomal hernia or presentation of an incisional hernia was detected during the follow-up.

Conclusions

The modified Sublay–keyhole repair appears to be an effective procedure for parastomal hernias, with a low incidence of recurrence and risk of morbidities. Collection of more cases and further follow-up examinations will be needed to confirm our findings.     

腹壁造瘘口旁疝44例防治体会

目的探讨腹壁造瘘口旁疝的防治方法.方法回顾性分析44例腹壁造瘘口旁疝的临床特点及修补方法.结果采用局部缝合23例,网片修补16例,重新造瘘加补片5例.39例均恢复良好,5例发生切口感染.41例获得随访,随访时间6～108个月,平均49个月.复发3例,复发率为6.8%.结论造瘘口旁疝的发生与多重因素有关,应当改善围手术期患者营养状况,治疗伴发的疾病,改进操作技术以预防造瘘口旁疝的发生;手术是惟一的治愈方法,对于巨大造瘘口旁疝需用网片修补,必要时应重新移位造瘘.     

Modified technique for parastomal hernia repair in patients with intractable stoma-care problems

OBJECTIVE: Although stoma relocation is generally the first choice of treatment for parastomal hernia, a repair using polypropylene prosthetic mesh is sometimes employed in cases of parastomal hernia recurrence. Use of this mesh, however, has been associated with a high risk of bowel erosion, adhesions formation, and fistulization. We therefore began to use expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh to perform an onlay parastomal hernia repair. Our initial clinical experience with this procedure is described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients aged 39-70 years with intractable stoma problems underwent a modified intra-abdominal onlay technique with implantation of a large (26 x 36 cm) sheet of ePTFE mesh. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 29 months (range, 5-52 months), no mesh-related bowel erosion, fistulization, or adhesion formation were observed. Two patients had a recurrence of the hernia due to technical failure. Re-operation in one of these resulted in wound dehiscence and removal of the contaminated mesh. Another patient developed intestinal obstruction postoperatively. The mesh was removed, and a gastrointestinal stromal tumour was found. Finally, a nonmesh related small bowel erosion required removal of the mesh in one patient. All other patients had full relief of symptoms. CONCLUSION: The modified onlay technique using a large sheet of ePTFE prosthetic mesh is a feasible option for treatment of parastomal hernia recurrence. Possible advantages of the procedure include stoma preservation, strengthening of the abdominal wall, and a reduced risk of recurrence, contamination, fistulization, and bowel adhesions and erosion.     

腹腔镜下行造口旁疝补片修补术

目的:探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行造口旁疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果.方法:2004年11月～2006年8月,对10例造口旁疝进行腹腔镜下补片修补术.结果:10例均在腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成造口旁疝修补手术.手术时间65～135 min,平均92 min.术后住院6～9 d,平均7 d.术后持续疼痛达3个月以上者3例,术后浆液肿2例,经穿刺抽液和加压包扎后治愈.无手术死亡、无造口感染和肠瘘发生.随访7～26个月(平均13个月),未见造口旁疝复发.结论:腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用腔内缝合器固定补片来修补造口旁疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,值得推广应用.     

腔镜修复术治疗结肠造口旁疝

目的总结腔镜下补片修补造口旁疝的手术技术要点。方法回顾性分析2004年9月至2006年11月复旦大学附属华山医院外科收治的16例行腔镜修补术治疗结肠造口旁疝病人的临床资料。结果16例造口旁疝病人中,14例修补成功,2例中转为开放缝合修补（1例因腹腔内广泛致密粘连,1例因小肠损伤）。手术时间平均116min（45～180min）。疝环直径平均5.4cm（4～6cm）。术后出现暂时性腹胀4例,修补区域腹壁疼痛12例（最长持续3周后明显缓解）,1例出现呼吸功能减退（经使用无创呼吸机辅助治疗后缓解）,7例出现浆液肿（经2～4次穿刺抽液并加压包扎后治愈,无血肿发生,未发生与手术相关的感染）。术后住院时间平均5.4d（3～8d）。术后随访平均7个月（1～17个月）,未见早期复发,疝囊较小和发病初期就行修补术者外观优于疝囊较大和发病时间较长者。结论腹腔镜造口旁疝补片修补术从技术上讲是安全、可行的,从早期的临床结果来看,效果亦较理想。     

Laparoscopic repair of incisional and parastomal hernias after major genitourinary or abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abdominal wall or parastomal hernias following major genitourinary or abdominal surgery are a significant surgical problem. Open surgical repair is difficult because of adhesion formation and poor definition of the hernia fascial edges. Laparoscopic intervention has allowed effective correction of these abdominal wall hernias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1997 to June 2000, 14 male and 3 female patients underwent laparoscopic abdominal wall herniorrhaphy at our institution. Of these, 13 patients received incisional and 4 parastomal hernia repair. All hernia defects were repaired using a measured piece of Gore-Tex DualMesh. A retrospective review of each patient's history and operative characteristics was undertaken. RESULTS: All repairs were successful. No patient required conversion to an open procedure, and there were no intraoperative complications. The average operative time was 4 (range 2.5-6.5) and 4.3 (range 3.75-5.5) hours in the incisional and parastomal group, respectively. The average hospital stay was 4.9 days (range 2-12) for the incisional group and 3.8 (range 3-4) days for the parastomal group. To date, two patients experienced a recurrence of incisional hernias, at 5 and 8 months postoperatively. No recurrences have developed in the parastomal hernia repairs at 2 to 33 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall incisional or parastomal hernias provides an excellent anatomic correction of such defects. Adhesions are lysed under magnified laparoscopic vision, and the true limits of the fascial defects are clearly identified. The DualMesh is easy to work with and has yielded excellent results. A comparison with open repair with respect to perioperative factors and long-term success is currently under way.     

Lateral repair of parastomal hernia.

INTRODUCTION: Parastomal hernia is a common complication of stoma construction. Although the majority of patients are asymptomatic, about 10% require surgical correction. AIMS: We describe a new surgical approach for the repair of parastomal hernias, which avoids both the need for laparotomy and stoma mobilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients (4 female) with parastomal hernia underwent surgical repair. Median age was 55 years (range 38-73 years). There were 8 para-ileostomy herniae and one paracolostomy hernia. A lateral incision was made approximately 10 cm from the stoma, and carried down to the rectus sheath. The dissection was carried medially towards the stoma, and around the defect in the abdominal musculature. The hernia sac was excised when possible and the fascial defect closed with non-absorbable, monofilament suture. A polyprolene mesh was placed round the stoma by making a slit in the mesh. The skin was closed with subcuticular monofilament absorbable suture. RESULTS: All patients returned to normal diet on the first postoperative day, and were discharged from hospital within 72 h. There were no wound infections, and no recurrences after a median follow up of 6 months (range 3-12 months). DISCUSSION: The technique we describe is simple and avoids the need of laparotomy. The mucocutaneous junction of the stoma is not disturbed, reducing the risk of contamination of the mesh, stenosis or retraction of the stoma. Grooving of the stoma and difficulty in fitting appliances is avoided because the wound is not placed near the mucocutaneous junction. This approach may be superior to other mesh repairs for parastomal hernia.