Full length parathyroid hormone,PTH(1-84), for the treatment of severe osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

ABSTRACT

Objective: To review and analyse the evidence supporting the use of full length parathyroid hormone, PTH(1-84), in the treatment of osteoporosis based on a search of several literature sources; articles selected for review were published between 1990 and 2008.

Background: PTH(1-84) is approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture in Europe. It was well tolerated in clinical trials and demonstrated bone building properties and fracture prevention particularly for the lumbar spine in the treatment of postmenopausal women.

Results: The TOP clinical trial showed that PTH(1-84) treatment for 18 months resulted in a 61% reduction (p = 0.001) in new vertebral fracture incidence when compared with placebo and reduced the risk of a first vertebral fracture by 68% (p = 0.006) in women without a prevalent fracture at baseline. PTH(1-84) increased bone mineral density (BMD) at vertebral and non-vertebral sites the lumbar spine BMD increasing regardless of T-score, age, prior osteoporosis therapy or number of years post-menopause. The PaTH study showed that treatment with PTH(1-84) for 12 months increased BMD at the trabecular spine and hip. Lumbar spine BMD gains were largest with sequential administration of PTH(1-84) followed by alendronate but were smaller with concurrent administration involving anabolic and antiresorptive agents. Lumbar spine BMD increases were also seen in trials involving PTH with raloxifene and PTH in combination with hormone replacement therapy.

Conclusions: PTH(1-84) has demonstrated effective bone building qualities and extends the therapeutic options available to osteoporotic women. The use of PTH(1-84) followed by sequential administration of an antiresorptive has proved effective at increasing trabecular BMD and points towards new treatment regimens offering improvements in BMD and fracture prevention.     

ZT-031, a cyclized analog of parathyroid hormone(1-31) for the potential treatment of osteoporosis

ZT-031 is a cyclic 31-amino acid analog of parathyroid hormone (PTH) that is in development by Zelos Therapeutics Inc for the treatment of osteoporosis and other bone-related disorders. ZT-031 activates the PTH type 1 receptor - the molecular target of the currently marketed osteogenic peptides PTH and PTH(1-34). Daily subcutaneous injections of ZT-031 prevented bone loss and replaced bone that had already been lost in an ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis. Daily subcutaneous injections of ZT-031 in gonad-intact monkeys increased bone mineral density (BMD) at cortical and cancellous bone sites and increased serum levels of bone formation markers. The daily subcutaneous administration of ZT-031 to postmenopausal women with osteoporosis elicited a dose-dependent increase in BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur and total hip area. Plasma levels of bone formation markers were significantly increased above baseline after 1 month of dosing, and prior to increases in bone resorption markers. ZT-031 was demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated; episodes of hypercalcemia were infrequent and observed with a frequency greater than with placebo only at the highest doses tested for the drug. Although available data are limited, the results obtained following treatment with ZT-031 have generally been at least as favorable as those obtained with other osteogenic PTH peptides. A novel dosing paradigm has been planned for the drug.     

激素替代疗法联合阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后骨质疏松的临床研究

目的观察激素替代疗法(HRT)联合阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后骨质疏松患者的疗效。方法采用随机、对照研究。69例绝经后骨质疏松症患者,随机分为联合用药组(联合组)、雌激素替代治疗组(雌激素组)和阿仑膦酸钠治疗组(阿仑膦酸钠组),每组23例。联合组每2周服尼尔雌醇片1mg,每3个月末10d加服安宫黄体酮6mg/d,同时给予阿仑膦酸钠70mg,每周1次口服。雌激素组为安慰剂+尼尔雌醇片和安宫黄体酮,阿仑膦酸钠组为安慰剂+阿仑膦酸钠。所有受试者均加服钙尔奇D600mg/d(每片含元素钙600mg和VitD125IU)。观察各组治疗后患者腰椎骨密度、血钙、血磷等骨代谢指标的变化及疼痛症状改善情况。结果通过1年治疗,3组患者的L1～4骨密度均有显著上升,其中联合组骨密度的上升更为明显(P<0.01),骨痛症状明显缓解,总有效率为100%,联合组的显效率高于其他两组。结论HRT联合阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后骨质疏松症,较单独用药更能有效地改善骨痛,提高骨密度值。     

Effects of Alendronate and Calcitonin on Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women. An Observational Study

Objective: Alendronate and calcitonin are antiresorptive drugs that were used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and were shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD). However, the effect of both drugs in daily clinical practice may differ from that observed in clinical trials.Method: About 50 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were observed during their first year of treatment. Among them, 32 patients used alendronate and 18 used calcitonin. Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and after 1 year of therapy. Biochemical markers (B-ALP – bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, OTC – osteocalcin and DPD/UCr – deoxypyridinoline/creatinine ratio) of bone metabolism were measured at baseline and 6 months later. Patient compliance was assumed by tablet counting and verified at interview. Each patient was further questioned about her attitude towards the treatment, as well as her dairy product intake, physical activity, use of other medications, smoking and social status.Main outcome measure: (1) Annual percent change in BMD in lumbar spine and femoral neck after the one-year treatment with either alendronate or calcitonin. (2) The change in biochemical markers of bone turnover.Results: The lumbar spine BMD significantly increased by 7.0% (P < 0.001), the femoral neck BMD by 4.3% (P < 0.01). OTC, B-ALP and DPD/UCr decreased significantly during the therapy with alendronate. Compliance with therapy was 79% (95% CI 68–90%). In the calcitonin-treated group, the lumbar spine BMD significantly increased by 3.1 % (P < 0.05), while the femoral neck BMD remained unchanged. OTC, B-ALP and DPD/UCr did not change significantly during the treatment with calcitonin. Compliance with calcitonin therapy was 87% (95% CI 63–110%). The annual change of BMD in both treatment groups was independent on all questioned factors.Conclusion: In daily practice, alendronate enhanced significantly BMD both in lumbar spine and femoral neck. Calcitonin showed increase only in the lumbar spine BMD.     

Denosumab: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Denosumab (Prolia?) is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody that is approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women at high or increased risk of fracture in the US, the EU and several other countries. Denosumab has a novel mechanism of action; it binds to receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand and inhibits bone resorption by inhibiting osteoclast formation, function and survival. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, denosumab reduced the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral and hip fractures compared with placebo over 3 years in the large, phase III FREEDOM study. In postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) or osteoporosis, treatment with denosumab increased BMD and decreased markers of bone turnover more than alendronate in those who were essentially treatment-naive in the 1-year DECIDE study and also in the 1-year STAND study, in which women were switched from alendronate to denosumab or continued alendronate treatment. Denosumab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, although long-term effects of very low bone turnover remain to be established. Denosumab is administered once every 6 months via subcutaneous injection, which may be a preferred method of administration and may improve adherence to treatment compared with other osteoporosis treatments. Denosumab is a valuable new option for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women at increased or high risk of fractures, and may be useful as a first-line treatment in women at increased risk of fractures who are unable to take other osteoporosis treatments.     

Does the combination of alendronate and parathyroid hormone give a greater benefit than either agent alone in osteoporosis?

In osteoporosis, both the bisphosphonate alendronate and parathyroid hormone (1-34) (PTH (1-34) ) have been shown to reduce the incidence of fractures. As bisphosphonates and PTH have different mechanisms, it has been proposed that their effects in osteoporosis may be additive. However, a major clinical trial of PTH (1-84) and alendronate in postmenopausal women demonstrated that their effects were not additive. A further trial in men with osteoporosis showed that alendronate impaired the ability of PTH (1-34) to increase bone mineral density. The combination of alendronate and PTH does not have greater benefit than either agent alone, and may even be detrimental, thus should not be used.     

阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后妇女骨质疏松症1年临床疗效观察

目的观察阿仑膦酸钠对绝经后妇女骨质疏松症的治疗作用。方法口服阿仑膦酸钠,70 mg每周1次,连用1年,分别在6个月和12个月观察骨密度、U-Ca、U-Cr和U-Ca/U-Cr。结果治疗后6个月和12个月,腰椎L2-4、股骨颈、大转子和全髋骨密度较治疗前都有显著提高（P〈0.05）,治疗12个月后与治疗6个月后比较差异也有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;治疗6个月后和治疗12个月后U-Ca和U-Ca/U-Cr较治疗前都有显著降低（P〈0.05）,且治疗12个月后U-Ca和U-Ca/U-Cr与治疗6个月后比较差异也有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;而U-Cr治疗前后差异则无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论阿仑膦酸钠对绝经后妇女骨质疏松症有很好的治疗作用。     

Alendronate: an update of its use in osteoporosis.

Alendronate (alendronic acid) is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate which binds to bone surfaces and inhibits bone resorption by osteoclasts. Oral alendronate 5 or 10 mg/day produces sustained increases in bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with or without osteoporosis, in men with primary osteoporosis and in both men and women with or without osteoporosis receiving systemic corticosteroid therapy. Histomorphometric analyses have found that alendronate does not appear to impair bone quality. Alendronate reduced the risk of radiographic vertebral fracture, clinical vertebral fracture or hip fracture by 47 to 56% in postmenopausal women who had > or = 1 existing vertebral fracture and in those with no existing vertebral fractures but who had osteoporosis. In a number of comparative trials in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, alendronate 10 mg/day was found to be more effective at inducing sustained increases in BMD than intranasal calcitonin, and at least as effective as conjugated estrogens and raloxifene. Alendronate 70 mg administered once weekly and 35 mg twice weekly are as effective at increasing BMD as 10 mg/day in this patient group. In clinical trials, alendronate was generally well tolerated when taken as recommended. Adverse events tended to be transient and associated with the upper GI tract, most commonly including abdominal pain, nausea, dyspepsia, acid regurgitation and musculoskeletal pain. No statistically significant differences between alendronate 10 mg/day and placebo have been found in the incidence of upper GI adverse events in large clinical trials. However, postmarketing surveillance reported a low incidence of adverse events related to the oesophagus. Specific instructions aimed at reducing the risk of upper GI adverse events have been provided by the manufacturer. CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate is effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of women or men with primary (including postmenopausal) or corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and in the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. The drug has been associated with upper GI tract adverse events, although the extent to which alendronate is responsible for these events has not been clearly established. Alendronate should be considered a treatment of choice in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Alendronate is also a suitable treatment option for primary osteoporosis in men and for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis in both men and women.     

Two-year changes in bone mineral density and T scores in patients treated at a pharmacist-run teriparatide clinic

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and T scores of patients after 2 years of teriparatide therapy, and to determine the number of fractures that occurred during therapy. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Pharmacist-run teriparatide clinic in a private-practice endocrinology group. PATIENTS: Sixty patients with osteoporosis who experienced fractures or adverse events while receiving antiresorptive therapy and were referred by the endocrinologists to the clinic between January 1, 2002, and January 1, 2004. INTERVENTION: After a 1-hour counseling and training session with a clinical pharmacist, patients self-administered subcutaneous teriparatide 20 microg/day for the next 2 years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome measures were dual x-ray absorptiometry-determined BMDs and T scores for the total hip, spine, and wrist at baseline and at 1 and 2 years. Patients' BMDs for the hip significantly increased by 3.5% at 1 year and by 3.9% at 2 years. In addition, BMD for the spine significantly increased by 7.2% at 1 year and 10.9% at 2 years. In 56 (93%) patients, BMD for the spine increased after 2 years of treatment. For the wrist, BMD decreased by 0.75% at 1 year and by 2.4% at 2 years, but the change was only significant at 2 years (p=0.011). At both 1 and 2 years, T scores for the total hip and spine significantly improved from baseline (p< or =0.019), whereas T scores for the wrist significantly declined after 2 years of therapy (p<0.003). No new fractures were documented in any of the patients. CONCLUSION. In patients with osteoporosis, the use of teriparatide in a pharmacist-run clinic significantly increased BMD at the total hip and spinal sites and significantly decreased BMD in the wrist.     

骨吸收抑制剂治疗绝经后骨质疏松的临床评价

目的　评价不同类型骨吸收抑制剂在临床原发性骨质疏松症治疗中的疗效。方法　30 0例原发性骨质疏松症患者分成三组 ,每组 10 0例 ,所有患者均排除继发性骨质疏松。性激素类组 :服用利维爱 2 5mg ,隔日 1次 ;降钙素组 :密钙息 5 0IU ,肌注 ,第 1周每天 1次 ,第 2周隔日 1次 ,以后每周 2次 ;二膦酸盐组 :阿仑膦酸钠 10mg ,每天 1次。治疗 2年后随访 :腰椎骨密度 (BMD)、胫骨骨超声 (QUS)、尿羟脯氨酸 (HOP)、骨钙素和新骨折。结果　临床骨痛降钙素缓解速度最快 ,性激素类药物可迅速有效地缓解妇女更年期症状。治疗 2年后 ,腰椎骨密度明显上升 (P <0 0 5 ) ,二膦酸盐组上升 5 1% ,性激素类组上升 4 2 % ,降钙素上升 0 97% ;胫骨骨超声显著提高 (P <0 0 5 ) ,性激素组上升 2 1% ,降钙素组 1 8% ,二膦酸盐组 1 7% ;新骨折共 4例 :二膦酸盐组 2例 ,降钙素组和性激素组各 1例 ;尿羟脯氨酸仅二膦酸盐组明显下降 ;骨钙素各组无明显变化。结论　骨吸收抑制剂是骨质疏松治疗的重要手段 ,性激素类药物是治疗伴有绝经后综合症骨质疏松患者的首选药物 ,二膦酸盐对骨量较低且伴有骨痛的患者有良好的疗效 ,降钙素治疗骨质疏松疼痛临床疗效显著。     

A comparison of teriparatide and calcitonin therapy in postmenopausal Asian women with osteoporosis: a 6-month study

OBJECTIVE: The number of hip fractures is expected to double in the next 20 years, with current estimates that Asia will account for 37% of these cases. As bone mineral density (BMD) may be used as a measure of fracture risk, we sought to compare the effects of teriparatide with salmon calcitonin treatment on changes in BMD, biochemical bone markers, and safety in postmenopausal Asian women with osteoporosis. METHODOLOGY: A total of 104 patients (n = 47 teriparatide [20 g/day subcutaneously] and n = 57 calcitonin [100 IU/day subcutaneously]) were enrolled in Hong Kong, Singapore, Philippines, Malaysia, and Thailand. Calcium (> or = 500 mg/day) and vitamin D (200-400 IU/day) supplements were taken throughout the 6-month controlled, randomized study. RESULTS: Teriparatide was associated with a 5.03 +/- 4.77% increase in lumbar spine BMD (p < 0.0001, mean +/- SD change from baseline), whereas changes in lumbar spine BMD for patients on calcitonin were not statistically significant (mean change of 0.36 +/- 4.12%, p = 0.16). Comparison of the two groups indicated that teriparatide treatment improved lumbar spine BMD statistically significantly more than calcitonin (p < 0.0001). No statistically significant changes were observed for total hip or femoral neck BMD. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) increased by 55.9% (median change from baseline, p < 0.0001) in the teriparatide group, and remained stable with calcitonin (5.0% change, p = 0.24); osteocalcin increased by 156.15% (median change from baseline, p < 0.0001) with teriparatide, and decreased with calcitonin (-15.25%, p = 0.03). Similar rates of adverse events were observed, with nausea and dizziness the most commonly reported for both groups (teriparatide versus calcitonin, 13.0% versus 23.2% p = 0.21, 10.9% versus 21.4% p = 0.19, respectively). There were no clinically relevant changes observed in laboratory parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were similarly tolerated, however teriparatide was associated with greater increases in lumbar spine BMD and bone formation markers, demonstrating the unique mechanism of action and safety of this treatment for osteoporosis in these Asian women.     

Efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION: This paper discusses the efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: The literature was searched with the PubMed from 1996 to the present, with respect to strictly conducted systematic reviews with homogeneity, meta-analyses with homogeneity, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with narrow Confidence Interval. RESULTS: According to the results of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs), bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate), raloxifene, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and strontium ranelate effectively prevent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Because raloxifene has been shown to be effective in preventing the initial vertebral fracture in postmenopausal osteoporotic women without prevalent vertebral fractures, it is considered in the treatment of postmenopausal women with mild osteoporosis or osteopenia with some risk factors for fractures. RCTs have also demonstrated that alendronate, risedronate, PTH, and strontium are useful to prevent non-vertebral fractures and that alendronate and risedronate prevent hip fractures, thus alendronate or risedronate are primarily considered as the first-line drugs in the treatment of elderly women with osteoporosis having some risk factors for falls. While it has been suggested that PTH may be considered in patients with severe osteoporosis, the use of PTH in the treatment for osteoporosis is limited to 2 years or less, and it may be appropriate to use other anti-resorptive drugs after the completion of PTH treatment to maintain the skeletal effects gained during the treatment. RCTs have demonstrated that the incidence of gastrointestinal tract adverse events in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with bisphosphonates and placebo are similar, and also the long-term efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate. CONCLUSION: The evidence derived from the literature, based on strict evidence-based medicine guidelines, suggests that there is long-term efficacy and safety with alendronate and risedronate in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.     

Risedronate: a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical use in resorptive bone disease

Risedronate is a novel orally administered pyridinyl bisphosphonate indicated for the prevention or treatment of postmenopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and Paget's disease. The drug reduces bone turnover and decreases resorption chiefly through osteoclastic effects, with no undesirable effects on cortical porosity or thickness or on cancellous bone volume. Four randomised, double-blind trials have been carried out in 4873 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. In 2 of these studies, the primary end-point of vertebral fracture incidence was reduced by risedronate 5mg once daily by up to 65 and 49% relative to placebo after 1 and 3 years, respectively. Across all 4 trials, risedronate improved lumbar spine, femoral neck and femoral trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) statistically significantly relative to placebo. The drug also prevented bone loss in a study in 383 women with recent menopause, and reduced the risk of hip fracture in elderly women with confirmed osteoporosis in a trial involving a total of 9331 patients. Risedronate 5 mg/day plus estrogen has been shown to be superior to estrogen alone in a 12-month double-blind study in 524 women with at least 1-year's history of menopause. Two randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled 12-month studies in a total of 518 patients have shown risedronate 5 mg/day to prevent or reverse bone loss in patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy. Risedronate 30 mg/day was associated with statistically significant reductions in mean serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in noncomparative studies in patients with Paget's disease. ALP normalisation rates ranged from 53.8 to 65% across two 84-day treatment cycles in 2 of these trials in 180 patients. In a randomised, double-blind study in 123 patients, risedronate 30 mg/day for 2 months evoked significantly greater serum ALP responses than etidronate 400 mg/day for 6 months. The overall tolerability profile of risedronate was similar to that of placebo in clinical studies, with no evidence of acute-phase reactions or mineralisation defects, or excess incidence of upper GI lesions, in patients receiving the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate is an effective and well tolerated novel bisphosphonate that is suitable for first-line therapy in Paget's disease. The rapid and sustained reductions in vertebral fracture incidence and BMD changes seen in patients with postmenopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis indicate the drug to be a valuable treatment option with first-line potential, particularly in patients for whom hormonal therapy is inappropriate. The effects of the drug on hip fracture incidence in elderly women with confirmed osteoporosis point to a particular role in older patients, or those with more advanced disease.     

Raloxifene: a review of its use in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that partially mimics the effects of estrogens in bone and the cardiovascular system, while functioning as an antiestrogen in endometrial and breast tissue. In randomised placebo-controlled studies involving postmenopausal women or patients with osteoporosis, raloxifene 60 to 150 mg/day was effective in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) over 12- to 36-month periods. At the 60 mg/day recommended dosage, increases of 1.6 to 3.4%, 0.9 to 2.3% and 1.0 to 1.6% were reported in lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip, respectively, versus < or =0.5% with placebo. Raloxifene 60 or 120 mg/day decreased the risk of vertebral fractures over a 36-month period in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis. Significant reductions in radiographic fracture risk versus placebo (30 and 50%) occurred regardless of whether patients had existing fractures at baseline. Although raloxifene did not affect the overall incidence of nonvertebral fractures, a reduction in the incidence of ankle fracture was reported in comparison with placebo. In postmenopausal women, raloxifene 60 mg/day significantly reduced serum levels of total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline, compared with placebo. High density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels were unaffected. Raloxifene 60 or 120 mg/day reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer by 76% during a median of 40 months' follow-up in postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis and no history of breast cancer. A relative risk reduction of 90% was reported for estrogen-receptor positive invasive breast cancers; estrogen-receptor negative cancer risk was unaffected by raloxifene. Raloxifene was generally well tolerated in clinical trials at dosages up to 150 mg/day. Adverse events thought to be related to raloxifene treatment were hot flushes and leg cramps. Venous thromboembolism was the only serious adverse event thought to be related to raloxifene treatment and a relative risk of 3.1 compared with placebo treatment was reported in patients with osteoporosis. Vaginal bleeding occurred in < or =6.4% of raloxifene-treated women but was reported by 50 to 88% of those receiving estrogens or hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Raloxifene treatment was not associated with stimulatory effects on the endometrium. CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene significantly increases BMD in postmenopausal women and reduces vertebral fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. In clinical trials, raloxifene was generally well tolerated compared with placebo and HRT, although its propensity to cause hot flushes precludes use in women with vasomotor symptoms. In particular, the lack of stimulatory effects on the endometrium and the reduction in invasive breast cancer incidence indicate raloxifene as an attractive alternative to HRT for the management of postmenopausal osteonorosis.     

盐酸雷洛昔芬防治绝经后骨质疏松症随机双盲对照研究

目的:评价雷洛昔芬(RLX)对绝经后妇女骨密度及骨代谢生化标志、脂代谢的影响及使用12个月的安全性观察.方法:采用随机、双盲安慰剂对照研究,68例绝经后妇女分为试验(n=34)及安慰剂组(n=34),每日分别服用RLX 60mg 或安慰剂,疗程12个月.结果:RLX组用药后腰椎及髋部骨密度均显著增加,腰椎骨密度升高2.30%,髋部骨密度升高2.07%,与安慰剂组比较骨密度变化的百分数差异有显著性(P<0.01).2组血清骨钙素、C端交联肽、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平均下降,其变化百分率2组比较差异均有显著性(P<0.01).结论:RLX能增加绝经后妇女骨密度,降低骨转换率及血清总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平.     

Comparison of change in bone resorption and bone mineral density with once-weekly alendronate and daily risedronate: a randomised,placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of alendronate (ALN) 70 mg once weekly (OW) and risedronate (RIS) 5 mg daily between-meal dosing on biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Research design and methods: This was a 3-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a double-blind extension to 12 months. The study enrolled 549 postmenopausal women (ALN 219, RIS 222 and placebo (PBO) 108) who were > or =60 years of age at outpatient centres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was reduction in urine N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen (NTx) corrected for creatinine level at 3 months. Secondary parameters included change in BMD at the spine and hip at 6 and 12 months, NTx at 1, 6 and 12 months, and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Adverse experiences (AEs) were recorded throughout the study for an assessment of treatment safety profiles and tolerability. RESULTS: Over 3 months, ALN produced a significantly greater mean reduction in urine NTx than did RIS (-52% vs -32%, p < 0.001), which was maintained at 12 months. ALN produced a significantly greater mean BMD increase than did RIS at 6 months, and it was maintained at 12 months at the lumbar spine (4.8% vs 2.8%, p < 0.001) and total hip (2.7% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001), as well as at the trochanter and femoral neck. Significant reductions in BSAP with ALN compared to RIS were maintained over the 12 months of treatment. Study size did not allow for meaningful assessment of differences in fracture rates. Tolerability was generally similar between ALN, RIS and PBO, and the incidence of upper GI AEs causing discontinuation and oesophageal AEs was similar in the ALN and RIS groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, ALN 70 mg OW produced a 50% greater reduction in bone resorption as measured by urine NTx and significantly greater increases in lumbar spine and hip BMD than did RIS 5 mg daily. The treatments had similar safety profiles and were generally well-tolerated. Additional studies are needed comparing OW ALN with OW RIS, which became available after the commencement of the present study.     

联用补肾壮骨汤、阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后妇女骨质疏松症的疗效分析

分析联合应用补肾壮骨汤、阿仑膦酸钠治疗绝经后骨质疏松症患者的临床价值.本文选取2018年4月至2019年12月在该院收治的62例绝经后骨质疏松症患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为研究组及对照组.研究组(n=31)予以补肾壮骨汤、阿仑膦酸钠联合治疗,对照组(n=31)应用阿仑膦酸钠治疗,记录两组治疗前后中医证候积...     

Potential role of FRAX analysis in postmenopausal women with osteopenia

Early diagnosis of osteoporosis and estimation of subjects that are at high risk for fracture, is neccesary for osteoporosis treatment. Dual-energy X-ray absorptometry (DXA) is a modern method for bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation. However, along BMD, clinical risk factors may significantly influence fracture development. Therefore, FRAX algorithm was designed for the assessment of a ten-year risk for serious osteoporotic fractures (SOF), as well as hip fractures. In the current study, we tried to evaluate the possible lumbal spine and hip BMD influence on ten year risk for SOF and hip fractures and potential role of FRAX in predicting the therapy in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. We performed the study on 385 postmenopausal women. According to the DXA measurements, at the lumbal (L) spine (L1–L4) and hip (femor neck), patients were then classified as normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic. BMD evaluation included the L spine and the hip (subgroup 1), and only on the L spine (subgroup 2). By filling up the FRAX questionnaire, a ten-year risk for SOF fracture and hip fracture was calculated. BMD evaluation, in complete patient’s group and in subgroup 1, resulted in the highest number of osteoporosis (61.04%, 48.08%, retrospectively), while ospeopenia was a main finding in subgroup 2. In the subgroup 1, a high risk for SOF and hip fracture was detected in 16.45% and with high risk for hip fracture in 11.38% subjects. In subgroup 2, only high risk for hip fracture was observed in 3.16% subjects, indicating the active medicament treatment. Simultaneously, correlation of BMD results with FRAX values for SOF and hip fracture, showed significant negative correlation (p<0.001). Obtained results showed significant role of femur neck BMD evaluation in predicting the future factors, which may, together with FRAX analysis, improve the therapy approach in postmenopausal women with ospeopenia.     

Efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis

ABSTRACT

Introduction: This paper discusses the efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Methods: The literature was searched with the PubMed from 1996 to the present, with respect to strictly conducted systematic reviews with homogeneity, meta-analyses with homogeneity, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with narrow Confidence Interval.

Results: According to the results of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs), bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate), raloxifene, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and strontium ranelate effectively prevent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Because raloxifene has been shown to be effective in preventing the initial vertebral fracture in postmenopausal osteoporotic women without prevalent vertebral fractures, it is considered in the treatment of postmenopausal women with mild osteoporosis or osteopenia with some risk factors for fractures. RCTs have also demonstrated that alendronate, risedronate, PTH, and strontium are useful to prevent non-vertebral fractures and that alendronate and risedronate prevent hip fractures, thus alendronate or risedronate are primarily considered as the first-line drugs in the treatment of elderly women with osteoporosis having some risk factors for falls. While it has been suggested that PTH may be considered in patients with severe osteoporosis, the use of PTH in the treatment for osteoporosis is limited to 2 years or less, and it may be appropriate to use other anti-resorptive drugs after the completion of PTH treatment to maintain the skeletal effects gained during the treatment. RCTs have demonstrated that the incidence of gastrointestinal tract adverse events in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with bisphosphonates and placebo are similar, and also the long-term efficacy and safety of alendronate and risedronate.

Conclusion: The evidence derived from the literature, based on strict evidence-based medicine guidelines, suggests that there is long-term efficacy and safety with alendronate and risedronate in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.