Exhaled nitric oxide in seasonal allergic rhinitis: influence of pollen season and therapy

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) has been proposed as a potential indirect marker of lower airway inflammation in asthma. To investigate the existence of lower airways inflammation in allergic rhinitis eNO measurements were performed in 32 patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis early in and out of pollen seasons and in 80 healthy volunteers. To further define how exhaled NO is modified by therapy, NO levels were detected following 1-month treatment with either inhaled steroids or non-steroids therapy with nedocromil. Exhaled NO (mean +/- SE) was significantly elevated in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis with and without symptoms (24.2 + 2.5 and 13.9 + 2.9 ppb, respectively) as compared to healthy volunteers (4.5 + 0.3 ppb) both in and out of pollen season (21.2 + 2.1 and 9.0 + 1.4 p.p.b., respectively) with a higher increase during the allergen exposure in season. Higher levels of exhaled NO were detected in patients with symptoms, either from the upper or lower airways, and with bronchial hyperreactivity. The increased exhaled NO in symptomatic patients was reduced only by inhaled steroids and not by nedocromil. These findings possibly suggest the existence of lower airway inflammation in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis in and out of pollen season. Thus, exhaled NO may be used as a non-invasive index for early detection of lower airway inflammation and for monitoring the optional treatment in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Increased nitric oxide production in the respiratory tract in asymptomatic pacific islanders: an association with skin prick reactivity to house dust mite

BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) is increased in asthma and may also be increased in subclinical airway inflammation. The relationship between atopy and subclinical airway inflammation in the pathogenesis of asthma remains unclear. We have evaluated the relationship between exhaled NO levels and skin prick test reactivity to 8 common allergens in 64 asymptomatic adult Pacific Islanders. Pacific Islanders were studied as a racial group with major morbidity from asthma. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether asymptomatic subjects with skin prick test reactivity to common allergens have elevated NO levels. METHODS: All subjects underwent full lung function testing and skin prick testing. Exhaled and nasal NO levels were measured by chemiluminescence (Logan LR2000 analyzer) with use of the single-breath and breath-holding techniques, respectively. RESULTS: House dust mite (HDM) reactivity was seen in 38 of 64 (56%). Exhaled NO levels (median 8.9 ppb, range 2.9-47.3 ppb) and nasal NO levels (527.5 +/- 181.5 ppb) lay above the normal European range in 30% and 25% of subjects, respectively. HDM reactivity was associated with higher exhaled NO levels (P <. 0005) and higher nasal NO levels (P =.01). In HDM-sensitive subjects the wheal size for HDM correlated with exhaled NO levels (r = 0.35, P =.04) and nasal NO levels (r = 0.40, P =.01). On multivariate analysis, exhaled NO levels were independently and positively related to the severity of HDM reactivity (P =.01) and nasal NO levels (P <.02), equation R(2) = 0.27. CONCLUSION: NO levels are elevated in a significant proportion of asymptomatic Pacific Islanders and are associated with HDM sensitivity. This may denote subclinical airway inflammation in this population and suggests that exposure to HDM in atopic individuals might play an important role in the early pathogenesis of asthma.     

The effect of allergic rhinitis on adenosine concentration in exhaled breath condensate

BACKGROUND: Patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) frequently develop asthma. This initiating inflammation in the lower airways may result in increased levels of inflammatory mediators such as adenosine in the exhaled breath. OBJECTIVE: We compared adenosine levels in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and both exhaled and nasal nitric oxide (NO) levels of AR patients and healthy control subjects. We also tested whether inhalation through inflamed nasal cavity during EBC sampling influences adenosine concentrations in exhaled air. METHODS: Exhaled and nasal NO levels were measured and EBC samples (at oral inhalation) were collected from 27 patients and 15 healthy controls. EBC collection was repeated after 15 min with subjects inhaling through their nose. Adenosine was measured by HPLC and NO was determined by chemiluminescence. RESULTS: The concentration of EBC adenosine was higher in patients with AR than in healthy controls (12.4+/-1.3 nM vs. 6.5+/-0.7 nM, P=0.0019) and this was accompanied by an increase in the concentration of exhaled NO (10.2+/-1.3 ppb vs. 5.3+/-0.5 ppb; P=0.0099, respectively). No difference in nasal NO was detected. EBC adenosine concentration showed a significant positive correlation with the level of exhaled NO. In contrast to healthy control subjects, patients with rhinitis had higher levels of exhaled adenosine when inhaling via the nose instead of the mouth (17.7+/-2.8 nM, P=0.007). CONCLUSION: When compared with healthy subjects, patients with AR exhibit an increased concentration of exhaled adenosine and a related increase in exhaled NO concentration. EBC adenosine is further increased when rhinitis patients inhale through their nose than via their mouth. Our data suggest that non-asthmatic patients with rhinitis may have subclinical inflammation in their lower airways.     

Both allergic and nonallergic asthma are associated with increased FENO levels, but only in never-smokers

Background:  Allergic asthma is consistently associated with increased FE_NO levels whereas divergence exists regarding the use of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) as marker of inflammation in nonallergic asthma and in asthmatic smokers. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of having allergic or nonallergic asthma on exhaled nitric oxide levels, with special regard to smoking history.
Methods:  Exhaled NO measurements were performed in 695 subjects from Turin (Italy), Gothenburg and Uppsala (both Sweden). Current asthma was defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma with at least one asthma symptom or attack recorded during the last year. Allergic status was defined by using measurements of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). Smoking history was questionnaire-assessed.
Results:  Allergic asthma was associated with 91 (60, 128) % [mean (95% CI)] increase of FE_NO while no significant association was found for nonallergic asthma [6 (–17, 35) %] in univariate analysis, when compared to nonatopic healthy subjects. In a multivariate analysis for never-smokers, subjects with allergic asthma had 77 (27, 145) % higher FE_NO levels than atopic healthy subjects while subjects with nonallergic asthma had 97 (46, 166) % higher FE_NO levels than nonatopic healthy subjects. No significant asthma-related FE_NO increases were noted for ex- and current smokers in multivariate analysis.
Conclusions:  Both allergic and nonallergic asthma are related to increased FE_NO levels, but only in never-smoking subjects. The limited value of FE_NO to detect subjects with asthma among ex- and current smokers suggests the predominance of a noneosinophilic inflammatory phenotype of asthma among ever-smokers.     

Exhaled air temperature in asthma: methods and relationship with markers of disease

BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath temperature has been proposed as a surrogate marker for the evaluation of airway inflammation in asthmatic patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to extend the investigation of exhaled air temperature as a means for the evaluation of airway inflammation using a professionally developed instrument. METHODS: Fifty-seven children, 41 allergic mild asthmatics and 16 healthy controls have been evaluated. They underwent exhaled air temperature and lung function measurement. The asthmatic children also underwent exhaled nitric oxide measurement, and hypertonic saline sputum induction for the evaluation of eosinophil (EOS) percentage. RESULTS: The level of exhaled temperature was significantly higher in asthmatics than in controls, being 30.18+/-0.14 degrees C vs. 27.47+/-0.24 degrees C (P<0.001). In asthmatic children, a positive relationship was observed between exhaled air temperature and both exhaled nitric oxide (r=0.39; P=0.01) and EOS percentage in samples from induced sputum (rho=0.53; P=0.04). CONCLUSION: The data from the present study support the hypotheses that exhaled breath temperature is related to the degree of airway inflammation in asthma.     

Exhaled nitric oxide levels and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in subjects with nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND:It is widely appreciated that asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways associated with airway hyperresponsiveness, and that nasal polyposis and asthma are related diseases. The objective of this study was to determine differences in exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) between nonasthmatic patients with nasal polyposis and healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty patients without asthma with nasal polyposis and 16 healthy control subjects were enrolled in the study. Participants were challenged with increasing concentrations of AMP and methacholine. ENO was measured with the single-exhalation method. RESULTS: Bronchoconstriction in response to AMP was detected in 7 (35%) subjects with nasal polyposis. The geometric mean (95% CI) of ENO for subjects with nasal polyposis was 33.1 parts per billion (ppb) (24.0-45.7 ppb) compared with 12.3 ppb (8.5-18.2 ppb) for the healthy controls (p = 0.0002). ENO values were significantly higher in atopic than in nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis [51.3 ppb (32.3-83.2 ppb) vs. 24.5 ppb (16.2-37.1 ppb), p = 0.02]. Nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis also had higher concentrations of ENO than healthy control subjects (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled AMP causes airway narrowing in a significantly higher proportion of nonasthmatic subjects with nasal polyposis than in healthy controls. Furthermore, increased concentrations of ENO are detected in atopic and nonatopic subjects with nasal polyposis. These results suggest that bronchial inflammation is present in nonasthmatic subjects with nasal polyposis.     

Effect of inhalation aspirin challenge on exhaled nitric oxide in patients with aspirin-inducible asthma

BACKGROUND: A complex relationship between arachidonic acid metabolites and nitric oxide (NO) synthesis has been reported in asthma. The effects of inhaled aspirin on fractional exhaled NO (FENO) in patients with aspirin-tolerant (ATA) and aspirin-inducible (AIA) asthma compared with normal controls have been investigated. METHODS: The FENO was measured baseline, after saline and lysine-aspirin (L-ASA) bronchial challenge in 10 patients with ATA and in 10 patients with AIA [mean (PD(20)FEV(1) L-ASA): 14.7 +/- 12.7 mg], who had comparable age and baseline FEV(1). Ten healthy subjects served as controls. Sputum eosinophils were counted after saline and after L-ASA challenge in the two groups of asthmatics. RESULTS: Asthmatic patients had baseline FENO significantly higher than controls (29.7 +/- 6.8 vs 9.8 +/- 2.05 p.p.b. respectively, P < 0.0001). No difference was observed in methacholine PD(20)FEV(1) and baseline FENO between ATA and AIA patients. After L-ASA inhalation, FENO increased significantly only in patients with AIA, reaching the peak value 4 h after bronchoconstriction (from 31.1 +/- 6 to 43 +/- 4.8 p.p.b., P < 0.001), while no change was observed in patients with ATA and in controls. Sputum eosinophils increased significantly after L-ASA inhalation only in patients with AIA (from 8.1 +/- 2.7 to 11.1 +/- 2.8%, P < 0.005) and there was a significant relationship between the increase in sputum eosinophils and the increase in FENO after ASA challenge. CONCLUSION: Exhaled NO may indicate eosinophilic airway inflammation during ASA exposure in patients with ASA inducible asthma.     

Determinants of increased exhaled nitric oxide in patients with suspected asthma

Exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) has been proposed as a marker of asthmatic inflammation, but it is unclear whether FENO in clinical use selects patients primarily according to their atopic or asthmatic status. The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of increased FENO in patients with suspected asthma, by means of multinomial logistic regression analysis. The FENO of 132 patients referred because of symptoms suggestive of asthma were studied, and the explanatory factors tested included atopy according to prick skin tests, clinical asthma according to lung function tests, sputum eosinophilia and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Slightly elevated FE(NO) levels were significantly explained only by sputum eosinophilia (OR: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.1-13.1; P=0.04), but for high levels of FE(NO) (> or =3 SD of predicted), clinical asthma (OR: 16.3; 95% CI: 5.4-49.7; P <0.0001) and sputum eosinophilia (OR: 12.0; 95% CI: 4.1-35.0; P >0.0001) were the characteristics with the highest prediction, followed by atopy and BHR. A significant interaction between asthma and atopy was observed relating to the effect on high FENO, but further analyses stratified by atopy showed significant associations between asthma and high FENO both in atopic and nonatopic patients. We conclude that in patients with symptoms suggesting asthma, slightly elevated and high levels of FENO are associated with sputum eosinophilia, whereas asthma is significantly associated only with high levels of FENO, irrespective of atopy. The results suggest that FENO is primarily a marker of airway eosinophilia, and that only high values of FENO may be useful to identify patients with atopic or nonatopic asthma.     

Exhaled leukotrienes and prostaglandins in asthma

BACKGROUND: Most of the studies investigating the role of leukotrienes (LTs) and prostaglandins (PGs) in asthma have used invasive (eg, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) or semi-invasive (eg, sputum induction) techniques. Others have measured eicosanoids in plasma or urine, probably reflecting systemic rather than lung inflammation. Collection of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a noninvasive method to collect airway secretions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate whether eicosanoids are measurable in EBC, to show possible differences in their concentrations in asthmatic patients and healthy subjects, and to investigate whether exhaled eicosanoids correlate with exhaled nitric oxide (NO), a marker of airway inflammation. METHODS: Twelve healthy nonsmokers and 15 steroid-naive patients with mild asthma were studied. Subjects attended on one occasion for pulmonary function tests, collection of EBC, and exhaled NO measurements. Exhaled LTB(4)-like immunoreactivity, LTE(4)-like immunoreactivity, PGE(2)-like immunoreactivity, PGD(2)-methoxime, PGF(2)(alpha)-like immunoreactivity, and thromboxane B(2)-like immunoreactivity were measured by means of enzyme immunoassays. RESULTS: LTE(4)-like immunoreactivity and LTB(4)-like immunoreactivity were detectable in EBC in healthy subjects, and their levels in asthmatic patients were increased about 3-fold (P <.0001) and 2-fold (P <.0005), respectively. Exhaled NO was increased in asthmatic patients compared with healthy subjects (P <.0001). There was a correlation between exhaled LTB(4) and exhaled NO (r = 0.56, P <.04) in patients with asthma. When measurable, prostanoid levels were similar in asthmatic patients and control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Exhaled LTE(4) and LTB(4) are increased in steroid-naive patients with mild asthma. EBC may be proved to be a novel method to monitor airway inflammation in asthma.     

Exhaled nitric oxide: relation to sensitization and respiratory symptoms

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data have been presented as to whether nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air is merely reflecting atopy rather than airway inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between exhaled NO (eNO) and nasal NO (nNO), respiratory symptoms, and atopy, in the context of a cross-sectional study of the respiratory health of bleachery workers. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-six non-smoking bleachery and paper-mill workers answered a questionnaire and were examined by measurements of eNO and nNO and spirometry, outside the pollen season. Blood samples were collected and analysed for specific IgE against common aeroallergens (birch, timothy, cat and house dust mite). Atopy was defined as a positive Phadiatop trade mark test. RESULTS: The atopic and the non-atopic subjects without asthma or rhinitis had similar levels of eNO. Subjects reporting asthma or rhinitis who were also sensitized to perennial allergens had higher levels of eNO, whereas those sensitized to only seasonal allergens had similar eNO levels as non-atopic subjects with asthma or rhinitis. In multiple linear regression models adjusted for nNO, eNO was associated with asthma and sensitization to perennial allergens. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that only atopic subjects who have recently been exposed to the relevant allergen have elevated levels of eNO. Atopic subjects who are not being exposed to a relevant allergen or have never experienced symptoms of asthma or rhinitis show normal eNO. These data indicate that eNO relates to airway inflammation in atopic subjects.     

Exhaled nitric oxide and biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate indicate the presence, severity and control of childhood asthma

BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide and inflammatory biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate may be useful to diagnose and monitor childhood asthma. Their ability to indicate an asthma diagnosis, and to assess asthma severity and control, is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To study (1) the ability of exhaled nitric oxide and inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (nitrite, nitrate, hydrogen peroxide, 8-isoprostane, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2, -4, -5, -10 and acidity) to discriminate between childhood asthma and controls. (2) The ability of these biomarkers to indicate asthma severity and control. METHODS: One-hundred and fourteen children were included: 64 asthmatics (10.7+/-3.0 years, 67.2% atopic) and 50 controls (10.0+/-0.4 years). Condensate was collected using a glass condenser. RESULTS: Exhaled nitric oxide, IFN-gamma and IL-4 in exhaled breath condensate differed significantly between asthma and controls. Multivariate backward logistic regression models demonstrated that IL-4 (odds ratio 7.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2-51.0) was the only significant indicator of an asthma diagnosis. Asthma control was best assessed by exhaled nitric oxide, 8-isoprostane, IFN-gamma and IL-4 (sensitivity 82%, specificity 80%, P<0.05), whereas exhaled nitric oxide, 8-isoprostane, nitrate and nitrite in condensate were the best indicators of asthma severity (sensitivity 89%, specificity 72%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Different markers in condensate are of an additional value to exhaled nitric oxide, and are needed in non-invasive inflammometry. They could be useful to diagnose asthma and to indicate asthma control and severity in childhood.     

A comparison of exhaled nitric oxide and induced sputum as markers of airway inflammation

BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) has been proposed as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation in asthma. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relationships among ENO, eosinophilic airway inflammation as measured by induced sputum, and physiologic parameters of disease severity (spirometry and methacholine PC(20)). We also examined the effect of corticosteroid treatment and atopy on ENO levels and eosinophil counts in induced sputum. METHODS: Measurements were taken on one day in 22 healthy nonatopic subjects, 28 healthy atopic subjects, 38 asthmatic subjects not taking inhaled steroids, 35 asthmatic subjects taking inhaled steroids, and 8 subjects with eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma. RESULTS: ENO levels showed significant but weak correlations with eosinophil differential counts in the steroid-naive asthmatic and healthy atopic groups (r (s) < 0.05). ENO levels were significantly lower in the asthmatic subjects taking steroids compared with the asthmatic subjects not taking steroids, despite there being no difference in the sputum cell counts, and a tendency to increased airflow limitation. ENO levels and sputum eosinophil counts were equally good at differentiating from steroid-naive asthmatic subjects. ENO levels were consistently raised in subjects with eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma. Atopy had no effect on ENO levels in the healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ENO is likely to have limited utility as a surrogate clinical measurement for either the presence or severity of eosinophilic airway inflammation, except in steroid-naive subjects.     

Regulation of pulmonary nitric oxide by carbon dioxide is intrinsic to the lung

Nitric oxide (NO) is present in exhaled air and is a regulator of airways and pulmonary vasculature. Exhaled NO can be depressed by inhaled carbon dioxide (CO2). To further characterize this, single-breath exhaled NO of rabbits was measured in vivo as well as in buffer-perfused lungs. Effects of bilateral carotid occlusion or reduction of extracellular pH were also studied. During control conditions NO single-breath peaks in exhaled air in vivo were 25 +/- 1 parts per billion (p.p.b.) as compared with 79 +/- 13 p.p.b. in the buffer-perfused lungs. Inhaled carbon dioxide (FI co2=10%) within 10-20 s caused a depression of exhaled NO in vivo (to 21 +/- 1 p.p.b., P < 0.05) and in perfused lungs (to 64 +/- 8 p.p.b., P < 0. 05). In vivo, the CO2-induced change in exhaled NO was unaffected by bilateral vagotomy, or by additional guanethidine treatment. Bilateral carotid occlusion did not affect exhaled NO. In perfused lungs, changes in pH (6.5-7.4) did not alter exhaled NO. Endogenous pulmonary nitric oxide production is thus measurable in single breaths in a small animal and is depressed by high airway concentration of carbon dioxide both in vivo and in the perfused rabbit lung. The effect by CO2 is independent of sympathetic outflow and the central nervous system and is not caused by changes in extracellular pH. Carbon dioxide thus exerts a local regulatory effect on lung nitric oxide.     

Buffering airway acid decreases exhaled nitric oxide in asthma

BACKGROUND: The human airway is believed to be acidified in asthma. In an acidic environment nitrite is converted to nitric oxide (NO). OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that buffering airway lining fluid acid would decrease the fraction of exhaled NO (F(ENO)). METHODS: We treated 28 adult nonsmoking subjects (9 healthy control subjects, 11 subjects with mild intermittent asthma, and 8 subjects with persistent asthma) with 3 mL of 10 mmol/L phosphate buffered saline (PBS) through a nebulizer and then serially measured F(ENO) levels. Six subjects also received PBS mouthwash alone. RESULTS: F(ENO) levels decreased after buffer inhalation. The maximal decrease occurred between 15 and 30 minutes after treatment; F(ENO) levels returned to pretreatment levels by 60 minutes. The decrease was greatest in subjects with persistent asthma (-7.1 +/- 1.0 ppb); this was more than in those with either mild asthma (-2.9 +/- 0.3 ppb) or healthy control subjects (-1.7 +/- 0.3 ppb, P < .001). Levels did not decrease in subjects who used PBS mouthwash. CONCLUSION: Neutralizing airway acid decreases F(ENO) levels. The magnitude of this change is greatest in persistent asthma. These data suggest that airway pH is a determinant of F(ENO) levels downstream from NO synthase activation. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Airway biochemistry modulates F(ENO) levels. For example, nitrite is converted to NO in the airway, particularly the inflamed airway, by means of acid-based chemistry. Thus airway pH should be considered in interpreting clinical F(ENO) values. In fact, PBS challenge testing integrates airway pH and F(ENO) analysis, potentially improving the utility of F(ENO) as a noninvasive test for the type and severity of asthmatic airway inflammation.     

Relation between exhaled carbon monoxide levels and clinical severity of asthma

Carbon monoxide (CO) can be detected in exhaled air and is increased in asthmatic patients not treated with corticosteroids. However, it is uncertain whether exhaled CO is related to severity of asthma. To study whether exhaled CO is related to severity of asthma in clinical courses, exhaled CO concentrations were measured on a CO monitor by vital capacity manoeuvre in 20 mild asthmatics treated with inhaled beta2-agonists alone, 20 moderate asthmatics treated with inhaled corticosteroids, and 15 stable asthmatics treated with high dose inhaled corticosteroids and oral corticosteroids once a month over 1 years. Exhaled CO concentrations were also measured in 16 unstable severe asthmatics who visited the hospital every 7 or 14 days for treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids and oral corticosteroids. The mean values of exhaled CO in severe asthma over 1 year were 6.7 +/- 9.5 p.p.m. (n = 31, mean +/- SD) and significantly higher than those of non-smoking control subjects (1.2 +/- 0.9 p.p.m., n = 20, P < 0.01). Exhaled CO concentrations in unstable severe asthmatics were significantly higher than those in stable severe asthmatics. However, exhaled CO concentrations in mild and moderate asthmatics did not differ significantly from those in non-smoking control subjects (P > 0.20). There was a significant relationship between the exhaled CO concentrations and forced expiratory volume in one second in all asthmatic patients. These findings suggest that exhaled CO concentrations may relate to the severity of asthma and measurements of exhaled CO concentrations may be a useful means of monitoring airway inflammation in asthma.     

Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on exhaled leukotrienes and prostanoids in asthmatic children

BACKGROUND: Lipid mediators play an important pathophysiologic role in atopic asthmatic children, but their role in the airways of atopic nonasthmatic children is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought (1) to measure leukotriene (LT) E 4 , LTB 4 , 8-isoprostane, prostaglandin E 2 , and thromboxane B 2 concentrations in exhaled breath condensate in atopic asthmatic and atopic nonasthmatic children; (2) to measure exhaled nitric oxide (NO) as an independent marker of airway inflammation; and (3) to study the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on exhaled eicosanoids. METHODS: Twenty healthy children, 20 atopic nonasthmatic children, 30 steroid-naive atopic asthmatic children, and 25 atopic asthmatic children receiving inhaled corticosteroids were included in a cross-sectional study. An open-label study with inhaled fluticasone (100 microg twice a day for 4 weeks) was undertaken in 14 steroid-naive atopic asthmatic children. RESULTS: Compared with control subjects, exhaled LTE 4 ( P <.001), LTB 4 ( P <.001), and 8-isoprostane ( P <.001) levels were increased in both steroid-naive and steroid-treated atopic asthmatic children but not in atopic nonasthmatic children (LTE 4 , P=.14; LTB 4 , P=.23; and 8-isoprostane, P=.52). Exhaled NO levels were increased in steroid-naive atopic asthmatic children ( P <.001) and, to a lesser extent, in atopic nonasthmatic children ( P <.01). Inhaled fluticasone reduced exhaled NO (53%, P <.0001) and, to a lesser extent, LTE 4 (18%, P <.01) levels but not LTB 4 , prostaglandin E 2 , or 8-isoprostane levels in steroid-naive asthmatic children. Conclusions Exhaled LTE 4 , LTB 4 , and 8-isoprostane levels are increased in atopic asthmatic children but not in atopic nonasthmatic children. In contrast to exhaled NO, these markers seem to be relatively resistant to inhaled corticosteroids.     

The relationship between exhaled nitric oxide and allergic sensitization in a random sample of school children

BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) has been proposed as novel a non-invasive marker of airway inflammation. OBJECTIVE: The level of exhaled NO was determined in a random sample of school children (7-12 years old) with the aim of investigating the relationship between exhaled NO and sensitization to common allergens. RESULTS: In the 450 children tested by skin prick tests (SPT), the prevalence of sensitization was 29.5% (overall), 21.9% (sensitization to indoor allergens), and 15.0% (sensitization to outdoor allergens). Regression analysis showed that levels of exhaled nitric oxide were closely associated with various measures of sensitization to aeroallergens. Sensitization to indoor allergens was associated with higher levels of exhaled NO (eNO) than sensitization to outdoor allergens when assessed by IgE but not when assessed by SPT. Children with reported wheeze in the past 12 months had much stronger associations between sensitization and eNO than children without wheeze. CONCLUSION: We conclude that allergic sensitization is strongly associated with increased levels of exhaled NO, especially in children with wheeze.     

Interrelationships among asthma, atopy, rhinitis and exhaled nitric oxide in a population-based sample of children

BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) has attracted increasing interest as a non-invasive marker of airway inflammation in asthma. However, little evidence exists on the influences exerted on eNO by the interrelations among atopic status, asthma and rhinitis. METHODS: Among the 1156 children who participated in a large-scale epidemiological survey on asthma and allergies (ISAAC II: International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood Phase II) in the city of Clermont-Ferrand, 53 asthmatics without corticosteroid treatment and 96 non-asthmatics were invited to perform eNO and skin prick tests (SPTs) to 12 common allergens. RESULTS: Atopic asthmatic children had higher eNO than non-atopic asthmatic children (28.9+/-9.1 vs. 17.1+/-13.1 p.p.b.; P=0.0004) with a significant increase when one SPT or more are positive (26.5+/-7.8 vs. 17.1+/-13.1 p.p.b.; P=0.03). Similarly, non-asthmatic, atopic subjects had higher eNO than non-atopic subjects with a significant increase when two SPTs or more are positive (19.4+/-9.8 vs. 11.7 +/-6.7 p.p.b.; P=0.003). In the case of equal levels of positive SPTs (0, 1, >/=2), asthmatic children always had higher eNO than non-asthmatic ones. Furthermore, among non-asthmatic children, the eNO level increased only in atopics who had rhinitis (20.7+/-13 vs. 12.5+/-6.4 p.p.b. in atopic controls (subjects without rhinitis and asthma) and 12.3+/-6.6 p.p.b. in non-atopic controls; P=0.001), whereas among asthmatic children, eNO level increased in atopics independently of rhinitis (28.2+/-9.5 p.p.b. in those with rhinitis and 30.9+/-8.1 p.p.b. in those without) as well as in non-atopics with rhinitis (22.5+/-17.2 p.p.b.). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that besides atopy and asthma, allergic rhinitis should also be taken into account in the assessment of eNO.     

Increased carbon monoxide levels in the nasal airways of subjects with a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis and in patients with upper respiratory tract infection

BACKGROUND: Carbon monoxide (CO) has emerged as an endogenously produced gaseous mediator known to be involved in bronchial smooth muscle regulation. Increased amounts of CO have been found in exhaled air during asthma and lower airway inflammation. Recently CO has been shown to be produced in the nasal airways, but there are no reports of altered CO levels in nasal airways during inflammation. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate if CO levels increase in the human nasal airways during inflammatory conditions, such as allergy and upper airway respiratory tract infection (URTI). METHODS: CO was sampled separately from the upper and lower airways of 13 healthy control subjects, six patients with a history of allergic rhinitis and six patients with URTI. RESULTS: Nasal CO levels were increased in subjects with allergic rhinitis, compared to healthy controls (2.07 +/- 0.15 ppm, n = 6 and 1.62 +/- 0.08 ppm, n = 13, respectively, P < 0.01). CO levels were also increased in patients with URTI, compared to the same controls (1.92 +/- 0.09 ppm, n = 6, P < 0.05). Normal levels of CO were found in air from the lower airways among subjects with allergic rhinitis, whereas corresponding levels in the URTI patients were increased. CONCLUSION: The present data demonstrates that upper airway CO levels increase in parallel with different inflammatory stimuli, such as allergy and infection, suggesting a role for CO as marker or mediator of nasal inflammation.