Levetiracetam induces a rapid and sustained reduction of generalized spike-wave and clinical absence

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam (LEV) is a new antiepileptic drug with efficacy in partial-onset seizures. We report a case in which generalized-onset absence seizures responded clinically and electrographically to LEV. METHODS: We evaluated with continuous video/electroencephalography an adult with generalized-onset seizures given 3 antiepileptic drugs, 1 of which was LEV. Levetiracetam initiation 2 months before admission decreased patient-reported seizures. Interictal electroencephalography revealed generalized 3.5-Hz spike-wave and polyspike-wave discharges. Spike-wave bursts lasting 2 seconds or longer caused a pause in continuous reading aloud, consistent with clinical absence seizures. Levetiracetam was discontinued on admission, lamotrigine was gradually discontinued across 2 days, and topiramate was not changed. One encephalographer counted from video/electroencephalography recordings the number of spike-wave bursts in 1-hour time samples that included wake and sleep time. RESULTS: Spike-wave bursts increased from 4 to 56 per hour at baseline (4000 mg of LEV per day) to 406 to 914 per hour less than 48 hours after LEV discontinuation. Levetiracetam treatment was restarted, and 3 hours after the first dose of 1000 mg, spike-wave bursts dropped to 135 per hour. Response was sustained during the next 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: This case showed a dramatic, rapid effect of LEV discontinuation and reinstitution on generalized spike-wave burst frequency and clinical absence. The effects were independent of reduction of lamotrigine and without change in topiramate doses and occurred in a time course consistent with LEV pharmacokinetics. Levetiracetam may be effective in generalized-onset epilepsy, and randomized, controlled trials are indicated.     

Influence on ictal seizure semiology of rapid withdrawal of carbamazepine and valproate in monotherapy

PURPOSE: To quantify changes in ictal seizure semiology during rapid withdrawal of carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) from a monoregimen in presurgical evaluation. METHODS: Therapeutic intensive seizure analysis (TISA) with video-EEG monitoring was used in 33 patients with pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy undergoing complete withdrawal of CBZ (20 patients) or VPA (13 patients) from a monoregimen. Monitoring phases included a 3-day baseline phase, a 3-day rapid antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal phase, and another 3-day AED-free phase with AEDs in subtherapeutic levels. Seizure variables as complete processes and their various elements (ictal signs) were analyzed, including duration (seconds), intensity (on a scale of 0 to 3), frequency (number per 3 days), and total duration of seizures and ictal signs in 3 days (seconds). The localization of seizure patterns on ictal EEG recording (EEG seizure onset) and the first appearing clinical ictal phenomena (initial ictal signs) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 188 seizures in the CBZ group and 57 seizures in the VPA group were investigated. Compared with the baseline phase, the CBZ group showed increases in duration, frequency of seizures, various ictal signs, and secondarily generalized tonic and clonic signs during the following two phases. Significantly increased values of the VPA group were observed in seizure duration and frequency of hypermotoric phenomena during the AED-free phase. More patients in the CBZ group had secondarily generalized clonic signs during the AED-free phase. EEG seizure onset and initial ictal signs showed no obvious changes between study phases. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of CBZ is followed more quickly by an increase of seizure frequency and severity than is the case for VPA withdrawal. Both CBZ and VPA withdrawal influences seizure propagation rather than the seizure-onset characteristics, which speaks in favor of its use in presurgical evaluation.     

Discontinuation of Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, and Valproate in Patients with Active Epilepsy

The effects of discontinuing individual antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with active epilepsy who are receiving combination therapy have not been studied systematically. We report a double-blind, prospective study of discontinuation of phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA) in 70 patients with chronic active epilepsy. Each drug discontinuation was randomized to one of two relatively fast rates of reduction, and a control group of 25 patients continued with stable therapy. Patients who had CBZ removed had a significant increase in seizures that was maintained for 4 weeks after the end of drug reduction, and 10 of these 23 patients had to restart therapy with CBZ. There was no significant change in seizure numbers in the other groups. Two patients discontinued from VPA had to restart the drug; none had to restart PHT. The optimal rates of reduction of CBZ remain uncertain. There was no evidence for a clinically or temporally distinct burst of "discontinuation seizures" in any group. Any marked increase in seizures always resolved on reintroduction of the discontinued drug.     

Absence Seizures and Carbamazepine in Adults

Summary: Carbamazepine (CBZ) therapy was associated with development of absence seizures in 4 adults with generalized epilepsy. Two patients had new appearance of absence seizures and 2 patients had recrudesence of remote absence seizures. The seizures abated after discontinuation of CBZ therapy or addition of ethosuximide (ESM) in 1 patient intolerant of valproate (VPA).     

New statistical method for analyzing time to first seizure: example using data comparing carbamazepine and valproate monotherapy

INTRODUCTION: Time to first seizure is a common outcome in antiepileptic drug (AED) studies. Previous studies have typically failed to find statistically significant differences between carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPS). We re-analyzed a meta-analysis comparing CBZ and VPS monotherapy with new powerful statistical methods that incorporate baseline seizure rate information. Methods: Individual patient data were available on 1,265 patients from a meta-analysis of five trials. The outcome measure was time to first seizure after randomization, adjusted for background variables and baseline seizure rate. RESULTS: We found strong evidence of an interaction between treatment and epilepsy type, and between treatment and age. For generalized onset seizures, VPS was statistically significantly better than CBZ: VPS delayed the first seizure after treatment 58%, 52%, 44%, and 36% longer than CBZ for individuals aged 10, 20, 30, or 40, respectively. For partial onset seizures in individuals older than 30, CBZ was significantly better then VPS; CBZ delayed the time to first seizure by 9%, 25%, 44%, and 66% longer than VPS for individuals aged 20, 30, 40, or 50, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results show clear age-varying differences between the effectiveness of CBZ and VPS for generalized onset and partial onset seizures, which have not been identified in previous studies using standard statistical methods. In future trials of AED monotherapy or add-on where time to first or Nth seizure is an outcome, methodology that can incorporate baseline seizure rate information would allow more powerful comparisons between treatments or between treatment and placebo.     

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs*

Summary: Antiepileptic drug (AED) selection is based primarily on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. However, efficacy is often similar for the different AEDs, and other properties such as adverse effects, pharmacokinetic properties, and cost may also be of importance. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the AED of choice is valproate (VPA). Secondarily generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single AED or combination of AEds. The AEDs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide (ESM) and VPA. For control of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major AEDs can be effective. If VPA cannot be prescribed, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), or primidone (PRM) may be effective, but ESM or a benzodiazepine (BZD) must be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The AEDs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures are CBZ and PHT. Increasing evidence suggests that VPA is a good alternative when CBZ and PHT fail. PB and PRM are second-choice selections because of adverse effects. A combination of two of the five standard AEDs may be necessary to treat intractable seizures, but no studies have been done to indicate an optimal combination. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, alcoholic epilepsy, and status epilepticus require specific AED treatment. Ultimately, AED selection must be individualized. No “drug of choice” can be named for all patients. The expected efficacy for the seizure type, the importance of the expected adverse effects, the pharmacokinetics, and the cost of the AEDs all must be weighed and discussed with the patient before a choice is made. A number of new AEDs with unique mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and fewer adverse effects hold important promise of improved epilepsy treatment.     

A Comment on the Efficacy of Valproate in the Treatment of Partial Seizures

Summary: Discrepancies in the findings of studies sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in the United States and the Medical Research Council (MRC) in the United Kingdom concerning the efficacy of valproate (VPA) in controlling simple or complex partial seizures, particularly those without secondarily generalized seizures, were reviewed. It was noted that the two studies differed with respect to their subjects' pretreatment seizure frequency. The frequency of complex partial seizures before treatment was obviously greater in the VA study, where carbamazepine (CBZ) provided better seizure control than VPA. Based on other comparative and non-comparative studies as well as the author's over 20 years of experience in the use of VPA in a tertiary epilepsy clinic, it is suggested that although VPA may be effective in controlling both the secondarily generalized seizures of symptomatic localization-related epilepsies and the generalized tonic-clonic seizures of idiopathic and. if not always, symptomatic generalized epilepsies, the efficacy of VPA in controlling simple or complex partial seizures is likely limited to patients with infrequent seizures.     

Valproate Monotherapy in 30 Patients with Partial Seizures

This retrospective pilot study describes 30 patients diagnosed and treated for complex partial seizures (CPS) and simple partial seizures (SPS) with and without generalization who received valproate (VPA) monotherapy after lack of response or allergic reaction for carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), or phenobarbital (PB). Seizures were tabulated daily on seizure calendars by the patients. Three time periods were examined for seizure frequency, 90 days before VPA treatment and 90 and 180 days after VPA treatment. Twenty-two were "controlled" or "improved" (reduction of seizure activity by greater than or equal to 51%) 6 months following the initiation of VPA. VPA was particularly effective in 17 patients who had secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) as a subtype of partial seizures. Failure of response to VPA in eight patients appears to be related to their type of partial seizure (SPS or CPS alone, without GTCS) and duration of uncontrolled recurrent seizures. Etiology and compliance were not related to treatment failure. This study supports the need for a double-blind controlled trial with VPA in patients with partial seizures.     

Effectiveness and tolerance of adjunctive treatment of lamotrigine and conversion to monotherapy in pediatric patients with epilepsy. Preliminary studies

The examination concerned patients with intractable epilepsy aged 9-19 years with partial seizures simple or complex, developing into generalized ones years, treated with VPA (valproate) or CBZ (carbamazepine). They received VPA or CBZ for at least 4 weeks and even with the therapeutic concentration of these drugs in blood serum in the month preceding the examination they demonstrated seizures at least twice. For a period of 8 weeks lamotrigine (LTG) was progressively added to the therapy. Both drugs were administered for at least 8 weeks in a full dose. In case of achieving a good therapeutic effect assessed on the basis of at least 50% seizure reduction the use of VPA or CBZ was gradually discontinued. In the period of 12-week observation an application of LTG monotherapy 2/3 of patients achieved 50-100% reduction of seizures. These patients improved reasoning dynamics and memorizing ability. After LTG administration EEG showed normalization of background activity and reduction of number and time of epileptic discharges.     

Modulation of sodium currents in rat CA1 neurons by carbamazepine and valproate after kindling epileptogenesis

PURPOSE: To determine the modulation of sodium currents in hippocampal CA1 neurons by carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA), before and after kindling epileptogenesis. METHODS: Voltage-dependent sodium current was measured in isolated hippocampal CA1 neurons, by using the whole-cell voltage-clamp technique. CBZ (15-100 microM) or VPA (0.5-5 mM) was applied by bath perfusion. Cells from fully kindled rats were compared with controls, 1 day and 5 weeks after the tenth generalized seizure. RESULTS: CBZ did not affect sodium current activation but selectively shifted the voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation to more hyperpolarized potentials. One day after the last kindled generalized seizure, the shift induced by 15 microM CBZ was 2.1+/-0.5 mV (mean +/- SEM; n = 20) compared with 4.3+/-0.3 mV (n = 16; p<0.001) in matched controls. The EC50 of the concentration-effect relation was 57+/-6 microM compared with 34+/-2 microM (p<0.01) in controls. Five weeks after kindling, these values had recovered to a level not different from control. VPA induces at a relatively high concentration a similar but smaller shift in voltage dependence of inactivation than does CBZ. After kindling, the shift induced by 2 mM VPA (2.8+/-0.6 mV; n = 19) was not different from controls (3.0+/-0.5 mV; n = 22). The EC50 for VPA was 2.6+/-0.3 mM compared with 2.5+/-0.4 mM in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Both CBZ and VPA selectively modulate the voltage dependence of sodium current steady-state inactivation and as a consequence reduce cellular excitability. The effect of CBZ was reduced immediately after kindling epileptogenesis, apparently by a reduced affinity of its receptor. In contrast, the shift induced by VPA was not different at any stage after kindling epileptogenesis. The change in CBZ sensitivity after kindling is related to epileptic activity rather than to the epileptic state, because it almost completely recovers in a period without seizures.     

Double-blind substitution of vigabatrin and valproate in carbamazepine-resistant partial epilepsy. 012 Study group

Patients from 12 countries reporting two or more partial seizures per month despite treatment with optimal doses of CBZ were randomised to additional vigabatrin (VGB, 2-4 g daily) or sodium valproate (VPA, 1-2 g daily) using a double-blind, double-dummy design. The study included a 6 month retrospective baseline on unchanged CBZ dosage, a month's prospective baseline, a short titration phase, and an assessment period lasting 3 months on duotherapy. CBZ was withdrawn over a further 2 months in responders ( > or = 50% monthly seizure reduction compared with baseline), who continued on alternative monotherapy for 3 or more months. If seizure control deteriorated, CBZ was reinstated and these patients were also followed up for 3 months. A total of 215 patients (108 VGB, 107 VPA) reporting a mean of seven partial seizures per month fulfilled the criteria for the intention-to-treat analysis. 53 and 51% of patients in the VGB and VPA group respectively achieved a monthly reduction in seizure numbers > or = 50%, respectively. 27 and 31% maintained alternative monotherapy. Overall, 17% (7% monotherapy, 10% duotherapy) of the VGB treated patients and 19% (8% monotherapy, 11% duotherapy) of the VPA group remained seizure-free during the final 3 month treatment period. VGB and VPA, which increase neuronal inhibition mediated by gamma aminobutyric acid, can be added to or substituted for CBZ when this Na+ channel blocker fails to control partial seizures. This lends credence to the hypothesis in support of a mechanistic approach to the management of epilepsy.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions of perampanel and other antiepileptic drugs in a rat amygdala kindling model

PurposeThis study explored the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of combining perampanel (PER) with commonly co-administered AEDs.MethodA strong stimulus intensity (three-fold higher than after-discharge threshold) was used to elicit drug-resistant seizures in a rat amygdala kindling model. Vehicle, low-dose PER (0.75 mg/kg), or high-dose PER (1.5 mg/kg), in combination with vehicle, levetiracetam (LEV) 50 mg/kg, lamotrigine (LAM) 20 mg/kg, carbamazepine (CBZ) 20 mg/kg, or valproic acid (VPA) 200 mg/kg, were administered intraperitoneally to groups of 6–13 rats. Seizure score, electroencephalography (EEG) seizure duration, and motor seizure duration were evaluated, with pharmacodynamic interactions determined by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Motor impairment was evaluated by rotarod test and two-way ANOVA.ResultsHigh-dose PER, but not low-dose PER, LEV, LAM, CBZ, or VPA, reduced EEG seizure duration, motor seizure duration, and seizure score compared with vehicle alone. However, when low-dose PER was administered in combination with LEV, LAM, CBZ, or VPA, seizure severity parameters were reduced compared with the concomitant AEDs alone. These pharmacodynamic interactions were statistically significant in some cases, but the same AED combinations were not associated with statistically significant neurotoxic interactions. Efficacy may have been slightly affected by changes in PER plasma concentrations in the presence of other AEDs:PER plasma concentrations increased with LEV or LAM co-administration, and decreased with CBZ or VPA co-administration.ConclusionOverall, these data support published Phase III data demonstrating the efficacy of PER as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures in patients aged ≥12 years.     

Treatment guidelines for adult epilepsy]

We reviewed the treatment strategies and choices of drugs for adult patients with epilepsy. As evidence from controlled studies for the older drugs is scarcely available from the literature, we added a clinical study performed in our hospital and an expert consensus study. Published randomized clinical studies revealed carbamazepine (CBZ) to be the treatment of choice, but provided little evidence for the differences in efficacy between phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), phenobarbital (PB) and zonisamide (ZNS). The clinical study in our patients with intractable localization-related epilepsy indicated the superior efficacy of CBZ and PHT over VPA or ZNS. Sixty-nine experts converged on the opinion that monotherapy should be started with VPA for seizures of both idiopathic and symptomatic generalized epilepsy, and with CBZ for seizures of localization-related epilepsy. When the trials with 2-3 monotherapy failed, surgery should be considered for localization-related epilepsy. We proposed practical guidelines for treatment of patients with adult epilepsy, including rehabilitation and care for improvement of quality of life.     

Absence seizures aggravated by valproic acid

PURPOSE: To report on pediatric patients with absence epilepsy who experienced absence seizure aggravation while receiving valproic acid (VPA). METHODS: The charts of all children from four pediatric epilepsy clinics receiving VPA for absence epilepsy were reviewed. Patients were evaluated and followed up between 1994 and 2000. RESULTS: Eight cases (six boys) of absence seizure aggravation were detected. Mean age at seizure onset was 5.8 years (range, 3-12 years). Six patients had simple absence seizures, one had myoclonic absences, and one had absences with automatisms. The electroencephalogram in all cases depicted generalized 3-Hz spike-and-wave activities. All eight patients experienced an increase in the frequency of absence seizures within days of VPA introduction. Dose increments resulted in further seizure aggravation. Serum levels of VPA were within therapeutic range in all patients. No case was attributed to VPA-induced encephalopathy. All patients improved on VPA discontinuation. In five children, VPA was reintroduced, resulting in further seizure aggravation. CONCLUSIONS: VPA can occasionally provoke absence seizure aggravation in patients with absence epilepsy.     

The coexistence of idiopathic generalized epilepsy and partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical, EEG, and imaging data of a series of patients with features of both idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) and partial epilepsy. METHODS: A computerized database of all patients attending the regional epilepsy clinic was used to identify all patients with IGE. Case notes were reviewed, and cases with clinical evidence of co-existing partial epilepsy identified. RESULTS: Nine cases with clinical features of a partial and generalized-onset epilepsy and with electrophysiological evidence of IGE are presented. This represented <1% of the overall IGE population in the clinic. Five (55.6%) patients are currently in remission, with successful epilepsy surgery in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: The coexistence of IGE and partial epilepsy is uncommon, and if appropriate treatment with a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug is given, then the prognosis can be good. Surgery should be considered for those cases with medically intractable partial-onset seizures as part of this syndrome.     

Exacerbation of Partial Seizures and Onset of Nonepileptic Myoclonus with Carbamazepine

A child had two to three generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures per week unresponsive to phenobarbital (PB) and valproate (VPA). Interictal EEG demonstrated left occipital spikes. When carbamazepine (CBZ) therapy was started, he developed very frequent (4-6/day) complex partial seizures (CPS) characterized on ictal EEG by focal right temporal lobe discharges. The seizure exacerbation, which was associated with development of nonepileptic, multifocal myoclonus, resolved 24 h after CBZ was discontinued. The exacerbation occurred with therapeutic CBZ serum levels, but may have been related to the toxic levels of carbamazepine-10, 11-epoxide (CBZE).     

Outpatient sleep recording during antiepileptic drug monotherapy

The effects of sleep and sleep deprivation on epilepsy are well known, but the effects of seizures and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on sleep have been less well studied. We recorded nocturnal sleep in 17 patients receiving antiepileptic monotherapy with ambulatory cassette EEG devices. Twelve patients had complex partial seizures and five had tonic-clonic convulsions. Two patients' seizures were largely nocturnal, and no seizures occurred during sleep recording. Five patients each were taking phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA), and two were taking clonazepam (CZP), all with therapeutic serum levels and no toxic symptoms. Total sleep time was reduced, wakefulness increased, and sleep latency prolonged in partial seizures as compared with generalized epilepsy. REM sleep was reduced and its latency decreased in partial seizure patients. Both groups had decreased slow wave sleep; that of partial seizure patients was decreased more markedly. PHT increased sleep latency and decreased sleep time, and CBZ increased awakening and diminished slow wave and REM sleep. Patients taking VPA had slight reduction in slow wave sleep; those taking CPZ had decreased sleep and REM latencies. Epilepsy may affect nocturnal sleep, and the effects of partial and generalized seizure disorders may be different. AEDs may also have differential effects on nighttime sleep. These may prove important in the long-term management of epileptic patients.     

Carbamazepine-exacerbated epilepsy in children and adolescents

Forty-nine children and adolescents whose seizures reportedly worsened while receiving carbamazepine (CBZ) were studied retrospectively. Twenty-six patients met criteria for excellent documentation of carbamazepine-exacerbated seizures. Four epileptic syndromes were particularly affected: childhood absence epilepsy; focal symptomatic, frontal lobe epilepsy; Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; and severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy. Eight of the 26 patients developed new-onset absence seizures and three patients with established absence epilepsy experienced absence status. Other seizure types, including atonic, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic, developed in eight patients treated with CBZ, and new generalized spike-and-wave discharges were observed in electroencephalograms of nine patients. CBZ is a widely used, effective antiepileptic drug, particularly for partial or partial complex seizures; however, if uncontrolled, generalized seizures occur after CBZ is prescribed for children or adolescents with absence or mixed seizures, a trial of CBZ discontinuation is warranted. The data reported here do not permit calculation of the incidence of this phenomenon.     

ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes

PURPOSE: To assess which antiepileptic medications (AEDs) have the best evidence for long-term efficacy or effectiveness as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy. METHODS: A 10-member subcommission of the Commission on Therapeutic Strategies of The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), including adult and pediatric epileptologists, clinical pharmacologists, clinical trialists, and a statistician evaluated available evidence found through a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents and the Cochrane Library for all applicable articles from 1940 until July 2005. Articles dealing with different seizure types (for different age groups) and two epilepsy syndromes were assessed for quality of evidence (four classes) based on predefined criteria. Criteria for class I classification were a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, >or=48-week treatment duration without forced exit criteria, information on >or=24-week seizure freedom data (efficacy) or >or=48-week retention data (effectiveness), demonstration of superiority or 80% power to detect a 相似文献   

Randomized dose-controlled study of topiramate as first-line therapy in epilepsy

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate as monotherapy, using a dose-controlled study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multinational, randomized, double-blind trial in adults and children (> or =6 years old) with epilepsy that was not being treated when randomized to 400 or 50 mg/day topiramate as target maintenance dosages. In addition to > or =2 lifetime unprovoked seizures, patients had to have one or two partial-onset seizures or generalized-onset tonic-clonic seizures in the 3-month retrospective baseline. The primary efficacy end point was time to first seizure; a secondary efficacy measure was the seizure-free rate at 6 months and 1 year. Double-blind treatment continued until 6 months after the last patient was randomized. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for time to first seizure (intent-to-treat, n = 470) favored 400 mg/day over 50 mg/day (P = 0.0002) as a target maintenance dosage. The first evaluation point with a significant difference (P = 0.046) favoring the higher dose was at day 14 when patients were receiving 100 or 25 mg/day. The probability of being seizure-free at 6 months was 83% in patients randomized to 400 mg/day and 71% in those randomized to 50 mg/day (P = 0.005). Seizure-free rates at 12 months were 76% and 59%, respectively (P = 0.001). Differences favoring the higher dose were significant in patients with partial-onset seizures (P = 0.009) and in those with generalized-onset tonic-clonic seizures (P = 0.005). The most common dose-related adverse events were paresthesia, weight loss, and decreased appetite. Discontinuations due to cognitive-related adverse events were 2% in the 50-mg group and 7% in the 400-mg group. Overall, 7% and 19%, respectively, discontinued with adverse events during the median treatment duration of 9 months. CONCLUSION: Topiramate is effective as monotherapy in adults and children. Because a therapeutic effect emerges during titration, clinicians should adjust dosages in step-wise fashion with intermediate stopping points, e.g., 100 mg/day, to evaluate patient response and achieve the optimal maintenance dosage.