Daily or three times per week interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to previous interferon alone

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon alpha-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.METHODS: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon alpha-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon alpha-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).RESULTS: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.     

Daily interferon induction regimen using different manufactured interferons (alpha-2A or alpha-2B) in combination with ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: [corrected] Studies on hepatitis C virus kinetics showed that serum levels of interferon fall 48 h after drug administration, when viral load is increasing again. Previously to the availability of pegylated interferon, daily induction therapy with standard interferon was under evaluation. AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of interferon alpha daily induction regimen in combination with ribavirin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized trial including 93 patients with chronic hepatitis C was carried out. On satisfying all eligibility criteria, patients were randomly allocated to two different treatment groups: 44 individuals in treatment arm A: IFN 3 MU thrice weekly + ribavirin 1.0-1.2 g daily for 48 weeks (IFN TIW) and 49 individuals in treatment arm B: IFN 3 MU daily + ribavirin 1.0-1.2 g daily for 12 weeks followed by IFN 3 MU thrice weekly + ribavirin 1.0-1.2 g daily, until completion of 48 weeks of therapy (IFN QD). HCV genotyping was obtained in 85 subjects. A negative HCV-RNA 6 months after cessation of therapy was considered a sustained virological response RESULTS: Eighty three patients completed treatment, five dropped out (one from IFN TIW and four from IFN QD) and in five patients therapy was discontinued due to medical request (two from IFN TIW and three from IFN QD). There was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to therapy interruption. The frequency of cirrhosis was 29%, similar in both groups. In the "intention to treat" analysis the overall sustained virological response was 39.8%. There was no significant difference in sustained virological response rate between both treatment strategies (36.4% IFN TIW vs 42.9% IFN QD). In the 83 patients who finished the trial, sustained virological response was 44.6%. Among subjects with HCV genotype-1, the sustained virological response was 42% (40.9% IFN TIW vs 42.9% IFN QD) and among patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3, the sustained virological response was 55.6% (50% IFN TIW vs 63.6% IFN QD) CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy had an overall sustained virological response rate of 39.8% ("intention to treat analysis"). There was no difference with respect to sustained virological response rates between patients who used daily induction schedule compared to standard regimen. Adverse events, even more frequent in the daily induction group, did not interfere with the treatment strategies.     

Daily or three times per week interferon α-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to previous interferon alone

Background/Aims: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon α-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon α-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Methods: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon α-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon α-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).Results: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.Conclusions: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.     

Efficacy of a short‐term ribavirin plus interferon alpha combination therapy followed by interferon alpha alone in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C: a randomized multicenter trial

Abstract: Background: Combination therapy with interferon alpha (IFNα) plus ribavirin has been shown to improve the sustained response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C but there is little information regarding the lengths of time for this therapeutic regimen. In this study we therefore tried to evaluate whether the analysis of different virological parameters could provide new clues with respect to the early determination of the efficacy of this form of combination therapy. Furthermore, we also examined whether short‐term induction combination therapy followed by IFNα alone is more effective than monotherapy in mounting an initial as well as a sustained virological response. Methods: 185 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C (mean age 42 years (range 19–65 years); 110 males, 75 females) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive, over the first 12 weeks, either interferon alpha 2a 6 million units (MU) three times weekly plus ribavirin 14 mg/kg per day (n=93) or the same dose of IFNα alone (n=92). Patients with a virological response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) after 12 weeks were subsequently treated with 3 MU IFNα alone thrice weekly for a further 40 weeks. Otherwise, treatment was discontinued. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up for 24 weeks. Results: Patient characteristics at baseline were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. An initial virological response at week 12 was seen in 61 (66%) patients receiving IFNα plus ribavirin and in 44 (48%) being treated with IFNα alone (p=0.015) and this improvement in the response rate was mainly restricted to HCV genotype 1‐infected patients (58% vs. 38%). In contrast, end‐of‐treatment (week 52) and sustained virological response rates were similar in both groups (37% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 17% [p=0.1], respectively). Interestingly, patients with HCV genotype 3, however, clearly benefited from short‐term combination therapy. Thus, sustained virological response rates in these patients significantly increased from 25% (IFNα monotherapy) to 59% (combination therapy) (p=0.05). Conclusions: Short‐term combined therapy for 12 weeks is more effective than the monotherapy with respect to the induction of an initial virological response but this effect applies only to genotype 1‐infected patients. However, there is no significant difference between both therapeutic schedules with regard to the induction of sustained response. Although HCV genotype 3‐infected patients seem to benefit from this short‐term combined therapy, prolonged combined therapy may be necessary in HCV genotype 1‐infected patients.     

Daily induction combination treatment with alpha 2b interferon and ribavirin or standard combination treatment in naive chronic hepatitis C patients. A multicentre randomized controlled trial

The standard treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C is a 6-12-month combination therapy with interferon alpha and ribavirin. Induction treatment could result in a faster early decline of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) load and a better response rate. Naive chronically infected HCV patients (n = 454) were randomized into two arms to receive either induction treatment with interferon alpha 2b 5 million units (MU) subcutaneously (s.c.) daily during a period of 8 weeks (arm A); or treatment with interferon alpha 2b 5 MU s.c. three times a week (TIW) for a period of 8 weeks (arm B). After week 8, interferon treatment in both arms was 3 MU s.c. TIW for a total period of 12 months. In both arms, ribavirin (1000-1200 mg orally per day) was added at week 4. Induction treatment resulted in a higher virological response at week 8 of treatment (66%vs 47%; P < 0.01). However, response at the end of treatment and at 6 months follow-up was not different (53%vs 50%, 41%vs 33%). The occurrence of adverse events and the drop-out rate were similar in both arms. Although an early virological response is observed more frequently in the induction treatment, end of treatment response and sustained responses did not differ.     

High-dose interferon alpha-2b induction therapy in combination with ribavirin for Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b with a high baseline viral load

Background Although pegylated interferon (IFN) is now used in many countries as a standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C, the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of high-dose interferon alpha-2b induction with ribavirin are not fully evaluated, especially in Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b with a high viral load.Methods Patients (n = 83) received daily, high-dose induction therapy of interferon alpha-2b (6 million units [MU] once daily for 2 weeks), followed by 6MU three times weekly for 22 weeks. Oral ribavirin (800 or 600mg/day) was given daily for 24 weeks, and then the patients were followed up for 24 weeks.Results Of the 83 patients, 67 (81%) had a biochemical response (BR), and 37 (45%) achieved a sustained BR (SBR). Virologic response (VR; undetectable serum HCV RNA level by polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) was noted in 55 (66%) patients, and sustained VR (SVR) in 16 (19%) patients. Baseline viral load did not influence treatment outcome. There was no significant difference in treatment outcome among treatment-naÏve patients, relapsers, and nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy. Multivariate analyses identified serum ribavirin concentrations at week 8 of therapy (odds ratio [OR], 23.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84–61.1; P = 0.015) and negativity for serum HCV RNA at week 8 (OR, 22.5; CI, 1.76–57.5; P = 0.017, respectively) as two significant and independent predictors of SVR.Conclusions The efficacy of 24-week combination therapy of high-dose IFN alpha-2b induction and ribavirin deserves attention in HCV genotype 1b patients with a high viral load, especially in nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy and patients with a very high viral load.     

Twenty-four weeks of interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin for Japanese hepatitis C patients: sufficient treatment period for patients with genotype 2 but not for patients with genotype 1.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA titer and HCV genotype are two major determinants of the outcome of interferon (IFN) monotherapy. To clarify the usefulness of combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin in Japanese hepatitis C patients, we treated patients with a relatively high dose of IFN in combination with ribavirin for 24 weeks and examined the effects in relation to the viral parameters. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-five patients were enrolled in the study. The patients received either 6 or 10 million units (MU) of interferon alpha-2b every day for 2 weeks and then three times a week for 22 weeks with a daily dose of either 600 or 800 mg of ribavirin. The treatment response and safety of this treatment were examined. RESULTS: The sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 26.8% in genotype 1 and 76.5% in genotype 2 (P < 0.001), and 36.1% with the 6 MU group and 45.8% with the 10 MU group (P = 0.09). Multivariate analysis indicated that SVR was associated with genotype 2, HCV RNA <500 kilointernational unit/ml (kIU/ml), and HCV RNA undetectability at week 8 of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our current study showed that a 24-week course of IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy was effective with respect to virologic response in Japanese hepatitis C patients, particularly in patients with HCV genotype 2.     

Intensive interferon therapy does not increase virological response rates in African Americans with chronic hepatitis C

To determine if an intensive regimen of daily, high-dose interferon would improve the initial response rates to therapy for hepatitis C genotype 1 among African American and Caucasian patients, we conducted a retrospective analysis of a treatment trial conducted between October 1995 and June 1997. Patients were randomized to 24 weeks of therapy with interferon –-_2b at either 5 MU daily or 3 MU three times a week. On the standard interferon regimen (3 MU three times a week) African Americans and Caucasians had similar initial response rates. However, unlike Caucasians, African Americans did not have an increased initial virological response when treated with an intensive, daily dose regimen. Levels of HCV RNA decreased more slowly during the first 12 weeks of therapy among African Americans. Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard estimates for the different race and dose combinations revealed that Caucasians who received daily interferon were most likely to have an initial response (logrank, P < 0.001).     

Interferon alfa2a induction therapy in combination with ribavirin and amantadine for the treatment of naive patients with chronic HCV infection

Summary.  Pilot studies have suggested that the addition of amantadine to interferon (IFN) is effective against hepatitis C virus (HCV). Furthermore, IFN induction therapy seems to improve virological response rates. In this open, randomized, multicentre trial we compared safety and efficacy of a triple therapy comprising IFN α 2a, ribavirin and amantadine using high induction doses (6 MU IFN α daily for the first 6 weeks) against a therapy with standard IFN α dosages over the entire treatment period plus amantadine and ribavirin. A total of 158 naive patients with chronic HCV infection were randomized 1:1. Group A ( n  = 81): induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily for 6 weeks, followed by 6 MU three times a week (tiw) for 18 weeks and then 3 MU tiw until week 48. Group B ( n  = 77): standard therapy with 6 MU IFN α tiw for 24 weeks, followed by 3 MU until week 48. All patients received oral ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day) and amantadine (200 mg/day). The triple therapy was safe and well tolerated. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to biochemical response rates. Groups A and B did not differ in virological response rates at the end of treatment (33% vs 35%) or at the end of the 6 month follow up period (37% vs 39%). We could not detect favourable effects on sustained virological response rates using induction therapy, in either genotype 1 or non-1 infected patients. In summary, induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily did not result in increased overall response rates compared with standard IFN α dosages of 6 MU tiw.     

Viral Kinetics and Treatment Response in Patients with Hepatitis C During Induction and Standard Interferon Therapy in Combination with Ribavirin

Background: The early decline of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels during therapy may predict the outcome and can be utilized to improve treatment regimens. We studied the HCV RNA levels during induction and standard interferon (IFN) and ribavirin treatment. Methods: Patients received IFN 3 MU daily for 14 days followed by 3 MU three times a week (induction group; n = 10), or IFN 3 MU three times a week from start (standard group; n = 21), in combination with ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day. HCV RNA was quantified day 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 during treatment, and tested qualitatively at the end of treatment and at follow-up. Results: The initial viral load decline was more pronounced in the induction group, and in patients infected with genotype non-1. The sustained response rate was not significantly different between the study groups. At day 1, the mean viral load decline from baseline was significantly greater in patients who became sustained responders than in those who became non-responders; 1.4 log (96%) versus 0.3 log (55%) ( P < 0.05). All sustained responders had a viral load decline of at least 0.7 log (79%) after the first IFN dose. Conclusions: Our short-term induction treatment did not improve the long-term treatment outcome significantly, although a trend was seen. An absent or low initial viral load decline can be used to predict non-response in the individual patient.     

High sustained virological response in chronic hepatitis C by combining induction and prolonged maintenance therapy

Summary.  Chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1 infection, liver cirrhosis, high viral load, or those who have not responded to anti-viral treatment in the past have limited chances of clearing the virus, even with pegylated interferon–ribavirin therapy. In this study we treated such patients with a treatment schedule that combines high dose induction Interferon (IFN), prolonged daily IFN and ribavirin treatment. Twenty-four consecutive patients were included in this study with either genotype 1 infection, cirrhosis, previous non-response to IFN or a combination of these poor-response characteristics. Patients were treated with 10 million units (MU) of IFN daily for 4 weeks followed by 5 MU/day until week 24, 3 MU/day until week 52 and 3 MU thrice weekly until week 76 in combination with 1–1.2 g ribavirin daily. HCV RNA levels were assessed weekly until week 4 and at least once every 3 months thereafter, by a validated assay with a detection limit below 500 copies/mL. Both intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis showed a high sustained virological response (ITT 67%, PP 80%). A virological response occurred rapidly (before 8 weeks of treatment) in all patients with a sustained response. Relapse after stopping therapy was observed in only 5%. Side-effects were observed frequently, and six patients had to be hospitalized. With this new treatment regimen that combines induction- and prolonged daily interferon treatment with ribavirin it seems possible to eliminate hepatitis C virus in the majority of patients that have an a priori limited chance of sustained response. Further clinical evaluation of intensive interferon and ribavirin combination therapy (now also including PEG-interferon) is recommended in centres that can provide close patient monitoring and experienced hepatological support.     

Consensus Interferon Plus Ribavirin for Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Patients Previously Treated With Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin

Background

Not enough data are available about the effectiveness of consensus interferon (CIFN) among HCV genotype 3 patients who failed to respond to pegylated interferon and ribavirin.

Objectives

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CIFN and ribavirin in non-responders and relapsers to pegylated interferon with ribavirin therapy.

Patients and Methods

This open-label investigator-initiated study included 44 patients who received CIFN 15 µg /day plus ribavirin 800-1200 mg daily. In patients with an early virological response (EVR), the dose of CIFN was reduced to 15 µg thrice a week for further 36 weeks. Patients with delayed virological response continued to receive daily CIFN plus ribavirin to complete 48 weeks. The patients were considered “non-responders” if there were less than 2 log reduction in HCV RNA at 12 weeks and detectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks.

Results

Twenty-four patients (55%) were non-responders and 20 patients were relapsers to the previous treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (mean age 43.6 ± 9.4 years, males 25 (57%)). Nine patients were clinically cirrhotic (Child A). End of treatment virological response was achieved in 19 (43.1%) patients and sustained virological response (SVR) occurred in 12 (27.3%). Out of these 12 patients, eight were non-responders and four were relapsers to the previous treatment. Advanced fibrosis or clinical cirrhosis was associated with low SVR. Adverse events were fever, myalgia, anorexia, depression, and weight loss. Two patients received granulocyte colony stimulating factor for transient neutropenia. Seven patients were given erythropoietin to improve hemoglobin, and six were treated for mild depression. Two patients developed portosystemic encephalopathy.

Conclusions

More than one-quarter of treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 3 achieved SVR after re-treatment with consensus interferon plus ribavirin.     

Efficacy of a short-term ribavirin plus interferon alpha combination therapy followed by interferon alpha alone in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C: a randomized multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with interferon alpha (IFNalpha) plus ribavirin has been shown to improve the sustained response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C but there is little information regarding the lengths of time for this therapeutic regimen. In this study we therefore tried to evaluate whether the analysis of different virological parameters could provide new clues with respect to the early determination of the efficacy of this form of combination therapy. Furthermore, we also examined whether short-term induction combination therapy followed by IFNalpha alone is more effective than monotherapy in mounting an initial as well as a sustained virological response. METHODS: 185 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C (mean age 42 years (range 19-65 years); 110 males, 75 females) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive, over the first 12 weeks, either interferon alpha 2a 6 million units (MU) three times weekly plus ribavirin 14 mg/kg per day (n=93) or the same dose of IFNalpha alone (n=92). Patients with a virological response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) after 12 weeks were subsequently treated with 3 MU IFNalpha alone thrice weekly for a further 40 weeks. Otherwise, treatment was discontinued. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Patient characteristics at baseline were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. An initial virological response at week 12 was seen in 61 (66%) patients receiving IFNalpha plus ribavirin and in 44 (48%) being treated with IFNalpha alone (p=0.015) and this improvement in the response rate was mainly restricted to HCV genotype 1-infected patients (58% vs. 38%). In contrast, end-of-treatment (week 52) and sustained virological response rates were similar in both groups (37% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 17% [p=0.1], respectively). Interestingly, patients with HCV genotype 3, however, clearly benefited from short-term combination therapy. Thus, sustained virological response rates in these patients significantly increased from 25% (IFNalpha monotherapy) to 59% (combination therapy) (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term combined therapy for 12 weeks is more effective than the monotherapy with respect to the induction of an initial virological response but this effect applies only to genotype 1-infected patients. However, there is no significant difference between both therapeutic schedules with regard to the induction of sustained response. Although HCV genotype 3-infected patients seem to benefit from this short-term combined therapy, prolonged combined therapy may be necessary in HCV genotype 1-infected patients.     

Combination therapy with interferon-alpha(2b), ribavirin,and amantadine in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders to interferon and ribavirin

Standard therapies for the treatment of hepatitis C are ineffective in almost 50% of patients. Amantadine is an antiviral agent that may have activity against hepatitis C virus. In this pilot study, we evaluated the efficacy of a combination of interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had previously failed 6–12 months of treatment with interferon and ribavirin. In this prospective open-label study, 23 patients were treated with a combination of interferon-_2b 3 million units subcutaneously three times per week, ribavirin 1000–1200 mg daily, and amantadine 100 mg twice daily for 6–12 months. Treatment was discontinued at 6 months if the patients had detectable HCV RNA by PCR. All patients were followed for 6 months after the completion of treatment. At the end of treatment, the biochemical response was 47% and the virological response was 30%. However, the rate of sustained virological response was only 13% (3/23). There were no unexpected side effects with triple therapy. In conclusion, triple therapy with interferon, ribavirin and amantadine resulted in a low sustained viral clearance in chronic hepatitis C patients who had previously failed interferon and ribavirin combination therapy.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients who failed interferon monotherapy: effects of higher doses of interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. The Virginia Cooperative Hepatitis Treatment Group

OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of interferon-ribavirin combination therapy for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients who failed previous treatment with interferon monotherapy. METHODS: A total of 140 patients with well-documented chronic HCV who failed to achieve a virological (if HCV-RNA was assessed) or biochemical response (if HCV-RNA was not assessed) to interferon monotherapy, 3 mU three times weekly (TIW) for 3-18 months, were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. Group A patients were treated with 5 mU interferon TIW for 6 months. Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) was added in those patients HCV-RNA positive at month 3. Group B patients were treated with 3 mU interferon TIW plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 months. The dose of interferon was increased to 5 mU TIW in those patients HCV-RNA positive at month 3. Group C patients were treated with 5 mU interferon TIW plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 months. Serum ALT and HCV-RNA were monitored during and after treatment for a total of 15 months. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of patients in group A became HCV-RNA negative by treatment month 3. Adding ribavirin resulted in one additional patient becoming HCV-RNA negative. However, none of the patients in this group achieved sustained virological response. Twenty-six percent of patients in group B became HCV-RNA negative by treatment month 3. Increasing the dose of interferon from 3 to 5 mU TIW increased virological response to 30%. However, sustained virological response was observed in only 14%. Thirty percent of patients in group C became HCV-RNA negative, but sustained virological response was observed in only 12%. Sustained virological response was found to be significantly greater in patients with a nontype I HCV genotype (p < 0.002) and in patients who had a decline in HCV-RNA titer to a value < 100,000 copies/ml during their previous course of interferon monotherapy (p < 0.0001). None of the 12 sustained responders were African Americans (p < 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Retreatment of nonresponders with interferon-ribavirin combination therapy results in limited benefit; only 13% of patients achieved sustained virological response. Response was extremely poor in African Americans and those with HCV genotype 1.     

Combination treatment of IFNalpha2b and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C and persistently normal ALTs

Combination therapy of interferon-_2b and ribavirin was prospectively evaluated in 20 patients with chronic replicative hepatitis and persistently normal ALTs. Patients with normal ALTs on three or more occasions within 6 months received interferon-_2b 3 MU three times a week with ribavirin 1000–1200 mg everyday for 12 months and had a follow-up of 6 months. HCV genotype 1 was found in 16, and HCV genotype 2 or 3 in 4 patients. No patient experienced an ALT elevation during therapy. Ten of 20 patients (50%) cleared virus at the end of treatment. In an intent-to-treat analysis, a sustained virological response (SR) was achieved in 8 of 20 patients (40%). Nonresponse occurred in 5 patients. Relapse and breakthrough were seen in 2 patients each. Treatment was discontinued in 3 patients due to side effects. Interferon (IFN) ribavirin combination therapy is effective in patients with normal ALTs and appears superior to IFN monotherapy.     

High-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in patients previously treated with interferon: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Kinetic studies have demonstrated a more rapid reduction in hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels among patients taking high daily doses of interferon compared with those taking standard-dose interferon. GOALS: To compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin with standard-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients previously treated with interferon. STUDY: One hundred seven patients (30 interferon relapsers and 77 interferon nonresponders) were randomized to take either high-dose interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin (group A) (consisting of 5 MU/d for 4 weeks, 5 MU three times weekly for 8 weeks, and then 3 MU three times weekly for 36 weeks) or standard-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin (group B) for 48 weeks. Serum alanine transaminase (ALT), HCV RNA levels, and safety data were prospectively collected and compared during treatment and at week 24 of follow-up. RESULTS: The mean serum ALT and HCV RNA levels, as well as the proportion of patients with genotype 1 and cirrhosis and who were African American, were similar in the two treatment groups at study entry. The rates of suppression of HCV RNA to undetectable levels at weeks 4, 12, and 48 were similar. In addition, the sustained virologic response rates at week 24 of follow-up were similar in groups A and B (29% vs. 39%, respectively, p = 0.277). Clinical variables that correlated with a sustained virologic response included a history of relapse to previous interferon therapy and non-1 HCV genotype ( p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term, high-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin failed to demonstrate a tangible benefit compared with standard-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. However, our study results and others suggest that standard-dose interferon and ribavirin for 48 weeks should be considered for selected patients who did not respond to previous interferon therapy.     

Iron reduction and sustained response to interferon-alpha therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: results of an Italian multicenter randomized study

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that iron depletion improves the response to interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C. We aimed to evaluate whether iron reduction by phlebotomy before interferon improves the rate of virological sustained response in previously untreated noncirrhotic patients. METHODS: One hundred fourteen hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA positive patients with hepatic iron concentrations of > or =700 microg/g dry wt (men) and > or =500 microg/g dry wt (women), stratified according to HCV genotype and gamma-glutamyltransferase values, were randomly allocated to interferon alone (6 MU three times a week) (group A) or to phlebotomy until iron depletion followed by interferon (6 MU three times a week) (group B). After 4 months dosage was reduced to 3 MU three times a week for another 8 months. RESULTS: Virological sustained response was observed in 25 patients (22%), nine (15.8%, 95% CI = 7.5-27.9) of group A and 16 (28.1%, 95% CI = 17.0-41.6) of group B. At univariate analysis the variables associated with the response were HCV genotypes 2-3, normal gamma-glutamyltransferase, higher levels of baseline ALT, normal ALT values, and negativity for HCV-RNA at the 3rd month of therapy. At multivariate analysis, genotype and ALT levels at enrollment maintained their association with the response. A trend toward a better response to interferon was observed in patients who received phlebotomy (odds ratio = 2.32, 95% CI = 0.96-6.24, p = 0.082). Patients with hepatic iron concentration of < or = 1100 microg/g dry wt had a trend toward a higher rate of virological sustained response (p = 0.059) when submitted to treatment B. CONCLUSION: Iron removal by phlebotomy is able to improve the rate of response to interferon, especially in patients with lower hepatic iron deposits; it could be useful as adjuvant therapy to new therapeutic modalities.     

Hepatitis C viral dynamics

It is apparent that the sooner the virus is cleared from the serum following IFN monotherapy, the better the sustained virologic response rates. It is also clear that in patients infected with HCV genotype 1a and 1b, standard dosages of IFN-alpha 2b (3 MU) administered three times a week are inadequate for a substantial and sustained lowering of HCV RNA serum levels. Understanding the kinetics and dynamics of HIV and HBV has greatly improved the understanding of the life cycle of these viruses and their response to therapy. Studies of the kinetics of HCV following initiation of IFN monotherapy have revealed that IFN-alpha 2b causes a rapid dose-dependent (3 < 5 < 10 = 15 MU) reduction in HCV RNA levels within 24 to 48 hours. This rapid exponential decline in RNA levels is best explained by an effect of IFN on viral production or release. The dose of other IFN products that maximally suppresses viral levels needs to be determined. Mathematical calculations reveal that HCV has a serum half-life of 3 hours and a viral production rate of 1.0 x 10(12) virions/d. After this rapid decline, there is a slower phase of viral decline that varies widely among patients and is attributed to the death rate of infected liver cells. The rate of decline of the second phase, which is probably mediated by immune clearance of infected liver cells, is the best viral kinetic predictor of early viral clearance. This kinetic information indicates that in patients infected with HCV genotype 1a or 1b, initial therapy with IFN should be daily and initial doses should be sufficient to reduce viral levels by more than 95% within 48 hours. Whether higher doses of IFN will alter or enhance the second phase of viral decline needs to be investigated. Also, the effect of ribavirin on IFN-mediated changes in HCV RNA levels needs to be investigated in carefully performed kinetics studies to better determine its mechanism of action. Defining the viral kinetics in patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 and in patients who do not respond to IFN therapy will also improve the approach to therapy.